Genetic Structure of Fragmented Populations of a Threatened Endemic Percid of the Rhoˆne River: Zingel Asper

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Genetic Structure of Fragmented Populations of a Threatened Endemic Percid of the Rhoˆne River: Zingel Asper Heredity (2004) 92, 329–334 & 2004 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0018-067X/04 $25.00 www.nature.com/hdy Genetic structure of fragmented populations of a threatened endemic percid of the Rhoˆne river: Zingel asper J Laroche1,2 and JD Durand1,3 1Laboratoire d’Ecologie des Hydrosyste`mes Fluviaux, UMR CNRS 5023, Universite´ Claude Bernard, 43 bd du 11 Novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne cedex, France; 2Laboratoire Ressources Halieutiques – Poissons Marins, Institut Universitaire Europe´en de la Mer, Place Nicolas Copernic, 29280, Plouzane´, France; 3IRD/Laboratoire Ge´nome, Populations, Interactions, UMR CNRS 5000, Universite´ Montpellier II, Station Me´diterrane´enne de l’Environnement Littoral 1, quai de la Daurade F-34200 Se`te, France Zingel asper is an endemic percid of the Rhoˆne basin equilibrium between mutation and drift. Thus, this population considered to be critically endangered. This species was shows an apparently better evolutionary potential for long- continuously distributed throughout the Rhoˆne in 1900, but term survival. Since 1930, a marked fragmentation of the today only occupies 17% of its initial area. In the present whole Rhoˆne system has appeared, related to the develop- study, five microsatellite loci were used to assess the level of ment of dams, and we assume that the significant genetic genetic variability within and among populations localized in differentiation detected between the populations could different sub-basins. Contrasting results were obtained for mainly reflect the impact of this fragmentation. The high the three main populations from the Rhoˆne. A reduced allelic turnover of the Z. asper populations, and the major role of diversity was observed for the two populations displaying the dispersal in population persistence (highlighted in a recent lowest patch sizes (length of the river system occupied); of population dynamics study), indeed suggest that the differ- these, a recent genetic bottleneck was detected for the entiation observed could mainly have arisen from habitat population showing a particularly low density. However, the fragmentation in recent history. third population was characterized by a relatively large Heredity (2004) 92, 329–334, advance online publication, 25 spatial extent, high local fish concentrations and an allelic February 2004; doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800424 diversity that was twice as high and associated with an Keywords: percid; genetic structure; microsatellites; Zingel Introduction have maintained a high level of genetic diversity (Withler et al, 2000). The same trend was observed for remnant During the last century in Europe, most river systems populations of bull trout in a tributary to lake Pend have shown extensive channel fragmentation, induced Oreille (Idaho), which displayed a high level of allelic by dams and flow regulation. This leads to the diversity and heterozygosity; in this environmental disappearance of habitats and to the reduction of the context, the expected genetic erosion could lag behind possibility of dispersal, and it thus limits the possibilities the demographic data for several generations (Spruell for numerous species to realize their biological cycle. et al, 1999). The time lag could be substantial particularly These alterations to the physical habitat could threaten for relatively long-lived species such as bull trout. In the many plant and animal populations through a possible same river system, another investigation was conducted erosion of their genetic variability by bottlenecks, genetic on the impact of a dam on bull trout (Neraas and Spruell, drift or inbreeding. 2001) which showed: (1) a demographic decline of the However, studies of temporal variability in genetic populations in upstream tributaries following the con- diversity over the last 50 years in Atlantic salmon struction of the dam, and (2) a reduction in the gene flow populations stress that the observed reduced level of through the prevention of migratory fish returning to variability was probably not an effect of human- their natal estuaries to spawn. Thus, the river fragmenta- mediated changes in population size, but instead could tion could lead in the future to the erosion of the genetic be associated with a founder effect during the recoloni- diversity in populations above the dam. zation of Northern Europe after the last glaciation More generally, population genetic theory predicts (Nielsen et al, 1997, 1999). Furthermore, despite succes- that, unless the reduction in effective population size has sive demographic bottlenecks and high exploitation, been very severe, no major changes in genetic variability some populations of sockeye salmon in British Columbia should be detectable (Frankel and Soule´, 1981). As expected, therefore, experimentally bottlenecked popula- tions of mosquitofish reared in mesocosms showed a Correspondence: J Laroche, Current address: Laboratoire Ressources Halieutiques – Poissons Marins, Institut Universitaire Europe´en de la significant erosion of their genetic diversity only with Mer, Place Nicolas Copernic, 29280, Plouzane´, France. very reduced effective sizes (Spencer et al, 2000). In a E-mail: [email protected] river system, the fragmentation of habitats cannot reduce Genetic structure of a threatened percid J Laroche and JD Durand 330 significantly the overall genetic diversity in populations maintain all populations of this species, and key of ubiquitous fish species, particularly if their effective populations need to be identified for priority action sizes remain large in the main channel of the river (Ferguson et al, 1995). (Laroche et al, 1999), thus counterbalancing the possible The aim of this investigation was to explore the genetic effects of genetic drift. On the other hand, fish species variability of Z. asper populations over different spatial displaying strong habitat requirements and small popu- scales in the Rhoˆne basin, using selectively neutral lation sizes in first-order rivers, such as Cottus gobio markers (microsatellites). Our main objectives were: (Hanfling and Brandl, 1998), may be suitable models in which to study the impact of fragmentation on genetic diversity. 1. to analyse the genetic diversity within populations Numerous studies in conservation genetics have and consequently to highlight possible genetic erosion focused on ways to preserve the genetic diversity of of the most endangered populations; endangered species (Avise, 1994; Vrijenhoek, 1998) and 2. to investigate genetic differentiation between the maintain local genetic resources. As natural areas different river watersheds, which could be the result remaining become smaller and increasingly fragmented, of a long-term geological history creating founder it is a matter of urgency to understand the evolutionary effects and/or of a more recent evolutionary history dynamics of small populations, in order to preserve them linked to habitat fragmentation (bottlenecks, genetic (Lande, 1988). drift, etc.); The genus Zingel is a percid whose distribution is 3. to set up the first basis of a conservation strategy. restricted to rivers zoogeographically connected with the Danube. Zingel asper, an endemic fish in the Rhoˆne basin, Material and methods is the result of a connection with the Danube system in the Pliocene (Changeux and Pont, 1995). In 1900, Z. asper The Rhoˆne river is the 42nd largest river in the world was distributed continuously throughout the Rhoˆne and (mean annual discharge) and some sectors are heavily main tributaries but today only occupies 17% of this area; perturbed by anthropogenic pressure from 19 hydro- this species is sensitive to overall habitat degradation electric plants (the first of which was erected in 1925), and particularly to the silting up of the bottoms five nuclear plants and from industrial pollution (Bra- (Changeux and Pont, 1995). The fishing pressure on vard et al, 1992). Over the whole Rhoˆne basin, the Z. asper remains very low and this species has not been remnant populations of Z. asper are mainly localized in artificially managed in the Rhoˆne basin. This species is three river watersheds (Labonne, 2002). The different considered to be critically endangered, but is only sampling stations were Droˆme (D1), Beaume (from B1 to marginally protected by a localized Biotope Protection B3), and Durance (DU1, DU2) (Figure 1). A similar Order (Keith, 2000). It will clearly be impossible to fishing effort (from 5 to 7 days, between 1997 and 1999) Beaume B1 (37 p)5 p) B2 (2 Saône Chass B3 (29 p) ezac Ardèche LYON e (15 p) Drôm Durance Rhône Buech Durance ) DU1 (34 p) DU2 (24 p 100 Km Figure 1 Approximate sample sites of Z. asper from the Rhoˆne basin. Numbers between brackets correspond to the number of sampled fish. Heredity Genetic structure of a threatened percid J Laroche and JD Durand 331 was conducted at each watershed; the very low Results density of fish in some rivers sometimes allowed us to catch only a small number of individuals. Allelic diversity, heterozygosity and linkage disequilibrium Fish were caught by scoop nets; a limited fragment The allelic diversity and the observed and expected of caudal fin was sectioned and placed in a tube heterozygosities were estimated for sampled locations with ethanol (90%), then the fish was reintroduced into (Table 1). The mean allelic richness was rather similar for the river. the Droˆme (6) and the Beaume (E8.4) and was DNA was extracted from the fins using the DNAeasy significantly higher for the Durance (E16); this trend Tissue kit (QIAGEN). The final elution
Recommended publications
  • Guidance Document on the Strict Protection of Animal Species of Community Interest Under the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC
    Guidance document on the strict protection of animal species of Community interest under the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC Final version, February 2007 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 4 I. CONTEXT 6 I.1 Species conservation within a wider legal and political context 6 I.1.1 Political context 6 I.1.2 Legal context 7 I.2 Species conservation within the overall scheme of Directive 92/43/EEC 8 I.2.1 Primary aim of the Directive: the role of Article 2 8 I.2.2 Favourable conservation status 9 I.2.3 Species conservation instruments 11 I.2.3.a) The Annexes 13 I.2.3.b) The protection of animal species listed under both Annexes II and IV in Natura 2000 sites 15 I.2.4 Basic principles of species conservation 17 I.2.4.a) Good knowledge and surveillance of conservation status 17 I.2.4.b) Appropriate and effective character of measures taken 19 II. ARTICLE 12 23 II.1 General legal considerations 23 II.2 Requisite measures for a system of strict protection 26 II.2.1 Measures to establish and effectively implement a system of strict protection 26 II.2.2 Measures to ensure favourable conservation status 27 II.2.3 Measures regarding the situations described in Article 12 28 II.2.4 Provisions of Article 12(1)(a)-(d) in relation to ongoing activities 30 II.3 The specific protection provisions under Article 12 35 II.3.1 Deliberate capture or killing of specimens of Annex IV(a) species 35 II.3.2 Deliberate disturbance of Annex IV(a) species, particularly during periods of breeding, rearing, hibernation and migration 37 II.3.2.a) Disturbance 37 II.3.2.b) Periods
    [Show full text]
  • Publis14-Mistea-007 {5E1DA239
    Bayesian hierarchical model used to analyze regression between fish body size and scale size: application torare fish species Zingel asper Bénédicte Fontez Nguyen The, Laurent Cavalli To cite this version: Bénédicte Fontez Nguyen The, Laurent Cavalli. Bayesian hierarchical model used to analyze regression between fish body size and scale size: application to rare fish species Zingel asper. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, EDP sciences/ONEMA, 2014, pp.10P1-10P8. 10.1051/kmae/2014008. hal-01499072 HAL Id: hal-01499072 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01499072 Submitted on 30 Mar 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems (2014) 413, 10 http://www.kmae-journal.org c ONEMA, 2014 DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2014008 Bayesian hierarchical model used to analyze regression between fish body size and scale size: application to rare fish species Zingel asper B. Fontez(1),(2), L. Cavalli(3), Received May 24, 2013 Revised February 20, 2014 Accepted February 21, 2014 ABSTRACT Key-words: Back-calculation allows to increase available data on fish growth. The ac- hierarchical curacy of back-calculation models is of paramount importance for growth Bayes model, analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Actualisation Des Connaissances Sur La Population D'aprons Du Rhône (Zingel Asper) Dans Le Doubs Franco-Suisse
    Master Sciences de la Terre, de l'Eau et de l'Environnement Ingénierie des Hydrosystèmes et des Bassins Versants Parcours IMACOF Rapport de stage pour l'obtention de la 2ème année de Master Actualisation des connaissances sur la population d’aprons du Rhône (Zingel Asper) dans le Doubs franco-suisse - linéaire du futur Parc Naturel Régional transfrontalier - Propositions d’actions en faveur de l’espèce et de son milieu Florian BONNAIRE Septembre, 2012 Maître de stage : François BOINAY Organisme : Centre Nature Les Cerlatez Photo, 1ère de couverture : deux aprons vus le 13 août 2012 sur les gravières de Saint- Ursanne, dont le seul jeune individu observé au cours de cette campagne 2012. Photo prise par : Florian Bonnaire REMERCIEMENTS Nombreux sont ceux qui m’ont soutenu jusqu’à l’aboutissement de cette étude. Mes prochains remerciements iront donc à ces gens passionnants qui m’ont ouvert leurs portes et enrichi à leur manière cette belle aventure. Tout d’abord, mes remerciements vont à François Boinay, mon maître de stage mais aussi directeur du Centre Nature les Cerlatez. Merci pour m’avoir offert l’opportunité de faire ce stage passionnant au cœur des paysages grandioses de la vallée du Doubs franco-suisse. Merci pour ton aide précieuse mais aussi ton humour formidable que je n’oublierai pas. À Mickael Béjean, cet homme entièrement dévoué à l’apron sans qui cette étude n’aurait pas pris tout son sens. Merci pour tous ces conseils et partages d’expériences plus que bénéfiques, ainsi que pour ces quelques prospections nocturnes et subaquatiques. À Marianne Georget, animatrice du Plan National d’Action en faveur de l’apron du Rhône, pour m’avoir ouvert les portes des spécialistes, sans quoi le déroulement de ce stage n’aurait certainement pas pris cette dimension transfrontalière.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 1: Field Protocol
    Annex 1: Field protocol Annex 1-Table 1: Fish data Fish data Date (dd/mm/yyyy) Site code Sampling method Site name Sampling location Name of watercourse Main river region XY co-ordinates GPS co-ordinates Longitude Transect length [m] Latitude Fished area [m2] Altitude[m] Wetted width [m] Fish data Fish species number of specimen number of specimen length ≤150 mm length >150 mm 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Annex 1-Table 2: Abiotic and method data Reference fields Site code Date dd/mm/yyyy Site name Name of watercourse or River name River region XY co-ordinates or longitude, latitude GPS co-ordinates Altitude m Sampling location Main channel/Backwaters/Mixed Sampling method Boat/Wading Fished area m2 Wetted width m Abiotic variables Altitude m Lakes upstream affecting Yes / No the site Distance from source km Flow regime Permanent / Summer dry/Winter dry/Intermittent Geomophology Naturally constrained no modification/ Braided/Sinuous/Meand regular/Meand tortuous Former floodplain No/Small/Medium/Large/Some waterbodies remaining/ Water source type Glacial/Nival/Pluvial/Groundwater Former sediment size Organic/Silt/Sand/ Gravel-Pebble-Cobble/Boulder-Rock Upstream drainage area km2 Distance from source km River slope m/km (‰) Mean air temperature Celsius (°C) Annex 1-Table 3: Human impact data (optional) Site code hChemical data Name watercourse Oxygen (mg/l or % saturation) XYZ co-ordinates or X:……………………(N) Conductivity (mS/cm) longitude latitude altitude Y:……………………(E) Z :…………………….m
    [Show full text]
  • Deliverable D5.D: Report on the Position of Exotic Species in the Context of Estuaries, Rivers and Lakes Multi-Stressors and Regarding Ecosystem Services
    Deliverable D5.D – Exotic species in multi-stressor context Funded by the European Union within the 7th Framework Programme, Grant Agreement 603378. Duration: February 1st, 2014 – January 31th, 2018 Deliverable D5.D: Report on the position of exotic species in the context of estuaries, rivers and lakes multi-stressors and regarding ecosystem services Lead contractor: Irstea Contributors: Maxime Logez, Benjamin Agaciak, Christine Argillier, Mario Lepage, Nils Teichert (Irstea), Rafaela Schinegger, Stefan Schmutz (BOKU), Pedro Segurado, Maria Teresa Ferreira (ULisboa), Guillem Chust, Ainhize Uriarte, Angel Borja (AZTI) Due date of deliverable: Month 33 Actual submission date: Month 37 Dissemination Level PU Public X PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) Page 1/51 Deliverable D5.D – Exotic species in multi-stressor context Content Non-technical summary ............................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 5 Methods ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Available data ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats Convention Relative À La Conservation De La Vie Sauvage Et Du Milieu Naturel De L'europe
    European Treaty Series - No. 104 Série des traités européens – n° 104 Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats Convention relative à la conservation de la vie sauvage et du milieu naturel de l'Europe Bern/Berne, 19.IX.1979 Appendix II – STRICTLY PROTECTED FAUNA SPECIES Annexe II – ESPÈCES DE FAUNE STRICTEMENT PROTÉGÉES (*) (Med.) = in the Mediterranean/en Méditerranée VERTEBRATES/VERTÉBRÉS Mammals/Mammifères Birds/Oiseaux Reptiles Amphibians/Amphibiens Fish/Poissons INVERTEBRATES/INVERTÉBRÉS Arthropods/Arthropodes Molluscs/Mollusques Echinoderms/Échinodermes Cnidarians/Cnidaires Sponges/Éponges Notes to Appendix II / Notes à l'annexe II _____ (*) Status in force since 1 March 2002. Appendices are regularly revised by the Standing Committee. Etat en vigueur depuis le 1er mars 2002. Les annexes sont régulièrement révisées par le Comité permanent. ETS/STE 104 – Bern Convention / Convention de Berne (Appendix/Annexe II), 19.IX.1979 __________________________________________________________________________________ VERTEBRATES/VERTÉBRÉS Mammals/Mammifères INSECTIVORA Erinaceidae * Atelerix algirus (Erinaceus algirus) Soricidae * Crocidura suaveolens ariadne (Crodidura ariadne) * Crocidura russula cypria (Crocidura cypria) Crocidura canariensis Talpidae Desmana moschata Galemys pyrenaicus (Desmana pyrenaica) MICROCHIROPTERA all species except Pipistrellus pipistrellus toutes les espèces à l'exception de Pipistrellus pipistrellus RODENTIA Sciuridae Pteromys volans (Sciuropterus russicus) Sciurus anomalus
    [Show full text]
  • One-Locus-Several-Primers
    Received: 29 August 2018 | Revised: 19 February 2019 | Accepted: 25 February 2019 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5063 ORIGINAL RESEARCH One‐locus‐several‐primers: A strategy to improve the taxonomic and haplotypic coverage in diet metabarcoding studies Emmanuel Corse1,2 | Christelle Tougard3 | Gaït Archambaud‐Suard4 | Jean‐François Agnèse3 | Françoise D. Messu Mandeng5 | Charles F. Bilong Bilong5 | David Duneau6 | Lucie Zinger7 | Rémi Chappaz4 | Charles C.Y. Xu8 | Emese Meglécz1 | Vincent Dubut1 1Aix Marseille Univ, Avignon Univ, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Marseille, France 2Agence de Recherche pour la Biodiversité à la Réunion (ARBRE), Saint‐Leu, La Réunion, France 3ISEM, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France 4Irstea, Aix Marseille Univ, RECOVER, Aix‐en‐Provence, France 5Laboratory of Parasitology and Ecology, Departement of Animal Biology and Physiology, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon 6Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier, CNRS, ENSFEA, EDB (Laboratoire Évolution & Diversité Biologique), Toulouse, France 7Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure (IBENS), Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, PSL Research University, Paris, France 8Redpath Museum and Department of Biology, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada Correspondence Emmanuel Corse and Vincent Dubut, Abstract Avignon Univ, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Aix In diet metabarcoding analyses, insufficient taxonomic coverage of PCR primer sets Marseille Univ, Marseille, France. Emails: [email protected] (EC); generates false negatives that may dramatically distort biodiversity estimates. In this [email protected] (VD) paper, we investigated the taxonomic coverage and complementarity of three cy‐ Funding information tochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COI) primer sets based on in silico analyses and Electricité de France (EDF); Agence we conducted an in vivo evaluation using fecal and spider web samples from differ‐ Française pour la Biodiversité (AFB); Syndicat Mixte d'Aménagement du Val ent invertivores, environments, and geographic locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Zingel Streber): Implications for Conservation
    Erschienen in: Aquatic Conservation : Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems ; 28 (2018), 3. - S. 587-599 https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2878 River damming drives population fragmentation and habitat loss of the threatened Danube streber (Zingel streber): Implications for conservation Alexander Brinker1,2 | Christoph Chucholl3 | Jasminca Behrmann‐Godel2 | Michaela Matzinger4 | Timo Basen1 | Jan Baer1 1 Fisheries Research Station of Baden‐Württemberg, Langenargen, Germany Abstract ‐ 2 University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany 1. The Danube streber, Zingel streber, is a threatened and data deficient percid fish endemic to 3 EcoSurv, Schnaitsee, Germany the Danube catchment. The study provides the first data on distribution, life history, and ‐ 4 Office of the State Government of Upper genetic structure of the species at the upstream limit of its historic distribution (south western Austria, Linz, Austria Germany). Correspondence 2. A 3‐year survey effort with 143 fishing events identified several small, fragmentary popula- Alexander Brinker, Fisheries Research Station tions covering only 7% of the historical range of the species. Census population sizes (N )of of Baden‐Württemberg, Argenweg 50/1, c 88085 Langenargen, Germany. these subpopulations were estimated from mark–recapture data at <200 individuals. Effective Email: [email protected] population sizes (Ne), calculated from genetic data (microsatellite genotyping), were much Funding information smaller still, at <15 individuals, resulting in an Nc/Ne ratio of <0.25, strongly indicating that Fischereiabgabe Baden‐Württemberg populations are seriously affected by genetic drift and inbreeding, and are thus facing a severe extinction risk. 3. Life‐history parameters recorded during the study indicate a rapid life cycle, with both sexes probably attaining sexual maturity at the age of 1 year or older.
    [Show full text]
  • Faisabilité De L'élevage De L'apron Du Rhône (Zingel Asper, L.) À Des Fins
    Faisabilité de l’élevage de l’apron du Rhône (Zingel asper, L.) à des fins de rempoissonnement de soutien de la population du Doubs Suisse Etude préliminaire mars 2012 Environnement et sciences aquatiques BP 1767, CH‐2001 Neuchâtel Tél.:032 724 72 62 / Fax.: 032 835 30 78 www.netaquarius.ch Auteur(s) du rapport : Mandant : Dernière modification : AQUARIUS : Blaise Zaugg & République et Neuchâtel, le 13 mars 2012 Jérôme Plomb canton du Jura : ENV Office de l’environnement (ENV) Faisabilité de l’élevage de l’apron du Rhône (Zingel asper) à des fins de rempoissonnement de soutien de la population du Doubs Suisse – Etude préliminaire Table des matières 1. INTRODUCTION ‐ CADRE ................................................................................................................... 2 2. SUIVI DE L’APRON DU RHONE SUR LA BOUCLE JURASSIENNE DU DOUBS ....................................................... 3 3. GENETIQUE DE L’APRON DU RHONE .................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Différenciations à l’échelle des bassins du Rhône .................................................................................. 4 3.2 Evaluation de la fragmentation et de l’érosion génétique ..................................................................... 6 3.3 Echantillonnage nécessaire pour une étude génétique .......................................................................... 7 4. ELEVAGE DE L’APRON DU RHONE .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • D2.1 Classification Map of Running Waters Considering Fish Community
    AMBER Project - H2020 - Grant Agreement #689682 Topic: Adaptive Management of Barriers in European Rivers D5.6: Plan on Exploitation and Dissemination of Results July, 2016 Author: World Fish Migration Foundation D2.1 Classification map of running waters considering fish community structure and barrier impacts This is version 2.0 D2.1 `Classification map of running waters considering fish community structure and barrier impacts .This document is a deliverable of the AMBER project, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Programme for under Grant Agreement (GA) #689682. D2.1: Classification map of running waters considering fish community structure and barrier impacts. April, 2018. EU Horizon 2020 Project: AMBER #689682 History of changes Version Date Changes Pages 1.0 03 Jan 2018 2.0 18 April 2018 DISCLAIMER The opinion stated in this report reflects the opinion of the authors and not the opinion of the European Commission. All intellectual property rights are owned by the AMBER consortium members and are protected by the applicable laws. Except where otherwise specified, all document contents are: “©AMBER Project - All rights reserved”. Reproduction is not authorized without prior written agreement. The commercial use of any information contained in this document may require a license from the owner of that information. All AMBER consortium members are also committed to publish accurate and up to date information and take the greatest care to do so. However, the AMBER consortium members cannot accept liability for any inaccuracies or omissions nor do they accept liability for any direct, indirect, special, consequential or other losses or damages of any kind arising out of the use of this information.
    [Show full text]
  • Wkcofibyc 2021
    WORKSHOP ON FISH OF CONSERVATION AND BYCATCH RELEVANCE (WKCOFIBYC; outputs from 2020 meeting) VOLUME 3 | ISSUE 57 ICES SCIENTIFIC REPORTS RAPPORTS SCIENTIFIQUES DU CIEM ICES INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE EXPLORATION OF THE SEA CIEM CONSEIL INTERNATIONAL POUR L’EXPLORATION DE LA MER International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H.C. Andersens Boulevard 44-46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] ISSN number: 2618-1371 This document has been produced under the auspices of an ICES Expert Group or Committee. The contents therein do not necessarily represent the view of the Council. © 2021 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). For citation of datasets or conditions for use of data to be included in other databases, please refer to ICES data policy. ICES Scientific Reports Volume 3 | Issue 57 WORKSHOP ON FISH OF CONSERVATION AND BYCATCH RELEVANCE (WKCOFIBYC) Recommended format for purpose of citation: ICES. 2021. Workshop on Fish of Conservation and Bycatch Relevance (WKCOFIBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 3:57. 125 pp. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.8194 Editors Maurice Clarke Authors Sara Bonanomi • Archontia Chatzispyrou • Maurice Clarke • Bram Couperus • Jim Ellis • Ruth Fernández • Ailbhe Kavanagh • Allen Kingston • Vasiliki Kousteni • Evgenia Lefkaditou • Henn Ojaveer Wolfgang Nikolaus Probst •
    [Show full text]
  • Zingel Asper (L., 1758) 1158 L’Apron Du Rhône Poissons, Perciformes, Percidés
    Poissons Zingel asper (L., 1758) 1158 L’Apron du Rhône Poissons, Perciformes, Percidés Le genre Zingel appartient à la sous-famille des Luciopercinae qui diffère des Percinae (Grémille, Gymnocephalus cernua, Perche, Perca fluviatilis) par un os interhémal antérieur pas plus large que les os postérieurs, des épines anales faibles, la ligne latérale prolongée sur la caudale, les deux dorsales séparées. La tribu des Romanichthyini (Aprons) regroupe deux genres et quatre petites espèces nettement benthiques, sans vessie gazeuse ni os prédorsal, bien distincts des Luciopercini (Sandre, Stizostedion lucioperca). Description de l’espèce Les géniteurs, âgés de 3 à 5 ans et mesurant 11 à 20 cm, se ren- dent avant février vers les frayères et sont de retour vers mai, On identifie sans peine Zingel asper par son aspect singulier : après la ponte qui se déroule en mars, dans des biotopes mal - corps fusiforme, la moitié antérieure ramassée et aplatie ven- connus (seule citation : la Durance à Monetier Allemont) sur des tralement, puis cylindrique après l’anus ; - grosse tête, bouche en croissant sous un museau arrondi ; pierres ou de la végétation des eaux fraîches et peu profondes. - deux narines frangées contiguës ; La fécondité est estimée à 5 000-6 000 ovules par femelle. Les - des petites dents mousses existent sur les mâchoires, le vomer œufs de 2,2 mm de diamètre sont blanc gris, translucides, avec et l’os palatin ; un globule lipidique. Ils adhèrent fortement. En captivité, on - opercule en pointe, préopercule dentelé ; observe plutôt des pontes non enfouies sur blocs et sable chez - deux épines operculaires inégales, des tubercules sur les arcs trois espèces de cette tribu.
    [Show full text]