Chromosome Karyotyping of Senna Covesii and S. Floribunda Based on Triple‑Color FISH Mapping of Rdnas and Telomeric Repeats

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chromosome Karyotyping of Senna Covesii and S. Floribunda Based on Triple‑Color FISH Mapping of Rdnas and Telomeric Repeats Plant Breed. Biotech. 2018 (March) 6(1):51~56 Online ISSN: 2287-9366 https://doi.org/10.9787/PBB.2018.6.1.51 Print ISSN: 2287-9358 RESEARCH ARTICLE Chromosome Karyotyping of Senna covesii and S. floribunda based on Triple‑color FISH Mapping of rDNAs and Telomeric Repeats Sung Min Youn, Hyun Hee Kim* Department of Life Sciences, Chromosome Research Institute, Sahmyook University, Seoul 01795, Korea ABSTRACT The genus Senna in the family Fabaceae is distributed and cultivated around the world and has been used as sources of medicine and commercial goods. Molecular cytogenetic study based on FISH technique is useful for breeding and genomic research of the species. Triple-color FISH karyotype analyses were carried out to understand the genome structure of two Senna species, S. covesii (A. Gray) H. S. Irwin & Barneby and S. floribunda (Cav.) H. S. Irwin & Barneby using 5S rDNA, 45S rDNA, and telomeric repeat probes. Three and one pairs of 45S and 5S rDNA signals were detected, respectively, in S. covesii, whereas one pair each of 45S and 5S rDNA signals, were detected in S. floribunda. Telomeric signals appeared at all chromosome termini in both species. This result provides basic cytogenetic information which will be useful for future breeding and genomic research of Senna species. Keywords 5S and 45S rDNAs, Telomeric repeat, Senna covesii, Senna floribunda, FISH INTRODUCTION species (Kim et al. 2005). The information can be useful in identifying species, tracing phylogenetic relationship The genus Senna in the family Fabaceae (Monkheang et among the related species, and breeding and development al. 2011) has various uses such as food, flower decoration of plant species (Koo et al. 2003b; Kim et al. 2005). and improvement of barren land (Elaine et al. 2005; Despite the economic and health benefits of Senna, Resende et al. 2014). It is especially well known as a cytogenetic studies are still limited in this genus (Kim et al. medicinal plant not only as ophthalmic medication but also 2005). in relieving skin diseases, alleviating poor digestion, Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique is healing of colds and even heart disease. In addition, it has an efficient and powerful tool in molecular cytogenetics to expanded its usefulness as a living food such as coffee and visualize specific DNA sequences on chromosomes and gum (Singh et al. 2013). Because of these advantages, allows to construct chromosome map of the sequences. Senna is widely cultivated around the world including Highly repetitive DNA sequences such as rDNA, Brazil, America, Asia and Africa (Marazzi et al. 2006; centromeric-, and telomeric-DNA have been used as FISH Singh et al. 2013). probes owing to their different number and distinct Cytogenetic studies provide information on chromo- distribution on chromosomes according to the species somal number, length, type, ploidy, and chromosomal (Hwang et al. 2009). Especially 5S rDNA, 45S rDNA, and distribution of specific sequences that are essential to telomeric repeat DNA are highly repetitive DNAs and elucidate genome structure and constitution in plant usually used as primary probes for FISH experiment in Received February 12, 2018; Revised February 14, 2018; Accepted February 14, 2018; Published March 1, 2018 *Corresponding author Hyun Hee Kim, [email protected], Tel: +82-2-3399-1715, Fax: +82-2-3399-1729 Copyright ⓒ 2018 by the Korean Society of Breeding Science This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 52 ∙ Plant Breed. Biotech. 2018 (March) 6(1):51~56 plants (Koo et al. 2003a; Han et al. 2013). et al. (2018). Mitotic metaphase chromosome spreads were Here, triple-color FISH karyotype was established using obtained following the procedure of Waminal et al. (2012). 5S rDNA, 45S rDNA, and Arabidopsis-type telomeric Thirty-two μL of a FISH hybridization master mix (50% repeat DNA probes to elucidate the chromosomal formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, and 2× SSC) were mixed constitutions of the genome of S. covesii and S. floribunda. with 25 ng of each of PLOP probes. Distilled water was This is the first report on FISH karyotype of the two species added to a total volume of 40 µL. Chromosomes with and this basic information will be useful to construct added PLOP probes on a glass slide were denatured at phylogenetic relationships among Senna species and 80°C for 5 minutes. Slides were incubated at RT, 30 breeding program of the medicinal species. minutes. The slides were washed with 2× SSC at room temperature for 5 minutes, 0.1× SSC at 42°C for 20 minutes and 2× SSC for 5 minutes at room temperature. MATERIALS AND METHODS Slides were dehydrated in ethanol series of 70%, 90%, and 100%, air-dried and counterstained with a premixed Plant samples 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) solution (1 μg/mL; Seeds of S. covesii and S. floribunda were obtained from DAPI in Vectashield, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, Agricultural Research Service, USDA (PI 675048 and PI CA, USA). Images were captured with a model BX53 601948). Seeds were germinated in the greenhouse. About fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped 2 cm roots were harvested, pretreated with 2 mM with a DFC365 FS CCD camera (Leica Microsystems, 8-hydroxyquinoline for five hours at room temperature, Wetzlar, Germany) and adjusted by using Cytovision ver. fixed in aceto-ethanol (acetic acid : ethanol = 1 : 3, v/v) for 7.2 (Leica Microsystems). Final images were edited using more than two hours and transferred to 70% ethanol. The Adobe Photoshop CC (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, stock materials were kept in the refrigerator until use. USA). Chromosome types were determined according to the description of Levan et al. (1964). Length of Chromosome spread preparation chromosomes were measured using ImageJ (NIH, USA). Mitotic metaphase chromosome spreads were prepared using the technique described by Kato et al. (2004), with some modifications. Root tips (∼2 cm) were digested in RESULTS 1% pectolyase (Sigma, Japan) and 2% cellulase (MB Cell, Korea) solution at 37°C for 75 minutes. Meristematic Conventional karyotype tissue (∼2 mm) of the roots were dissected using a needle, Both S. covesii and S. floribunda had chromosome transferred into a 1.5 mL tube with 40 μL chilled number of 2n = 28. The chromosome length of S. covesii aceto-ethanol fixative solution (acetic acid : ethanol = 1:3, ranged from 3.58 to 5.67 μm (Table 1) and those of S. v/v) and vortexed for 30 seconds at room temperature. floribunda ranged from 2.37 to 3.52 μm (Table 2). Both After centrifugation, pellets were resuspended with species had 10 metacentrics and four submetacentric aceto-ethanol (acetic acid : ethanol = 9 : 1, v/v) solution and chromosomes, but S. floribunda chromosomes were drop on a slide glass in the humid chamber and then shorter than those of S. covesii. One pair of satellite air-dried. chromosomes were observed in chromosome 13 of both species (Figs. 1 and 2). Fluorescence in situ hybridization The 5S and 45S rDNAs and Arabidopsis-type telomeric Chromosomal distribution of rDNA and telomeric repeat sequences repeat sequences (TTTAGGG)n were used as probes for FISH karyotype analysis. The pre-labelled oligoprobes As a result of triple-color FISH karyotype analysis using (PLOP) were designed and prepared according to Waminal 5S rDNA, 45S rDNA, and telomeric repeat probes, three Triple-color FISH in Senna Species ∙ 53 Table 1. Karyotypic analysis of mitotic metaphase chromo- Table 2. Karyotypic analysis of mitotic metaphase chromo- some of S. covesii. some of S. floribunda. Arm length (μm) Arm length (μm) Chromosome Chromosome Arm Arm number Short Long Total Type number Short Long Total Type ratio ratio (2n = 28) (S) (L) (S + L) (2n = 28) (S) (L) (S + L) (L/S) (L/S) 1 2.60 3.07 5.67 1.18 mz) 1 1.31 2.21 3.52 1.68 mz) 2 2.09 2.54 4.63 1.21 m 2 1.19 2.11 3.30 1.77 smy) 3 2.11 2.42 4.53 1.14 m 3 1.07 2.07 3.14 1.93 sm 4 1.97 2.43 4.40 1.23 m 4 1.05 2.01 3.06 1.91 sm 5 1.96 2.44 4.40 1.24 m 5 1.27 1.62 2.89 1.27 m 6 2.10 2.12 4.22 1.01 m 6 1.22 1.64 2.86 1.34 m 7 1.14 3.01 4.15 2.64 smy) 7 1.58 1.27 2.85 0.80 m 8 1.84 2.28 4.12 1.23 m 8 1.21 1.61 2.82 1.33 m 9 1.70 2.30 4.00 1.35 m 9 1.41 1.31 2.72 0.92 m 10 1.79 2.17 3.96 1.21 m 10 1.11 1.61 2.72 1.45 m 11 2.02 1.90 3.92 0.94 m 11 1.07 1.64 2.71 1.53 m 12 1.35 2.49 3.84 1.84 sm 12 1.09 1.45 2.54 1.33 m 13x) 1.10 2.53 3.63 2.30 sm 13x) 0.85 1.67 2.52 1.96 sm 14 1.12 2.46 3.58 2.19 sm 14 0.99 1.38 2.37 1.39 m Total 24.89 34.16 59.07 10 m + Total 16.42 23.6 40.02 10 m + 4 sm 4 sm z)metacentric, y)submetacentric, x)satellite chromosome with z)metacentric, y)submetacentric, x)satellite chromosome with secondary constriction.
Recommended publications
  • Arcadia at Silverleaf
    Section Six - Landscape Design Mature Size ADWR Common Name Botanical Name (H x W) Size Zone Natural and Transitional Zones Streetscape Enhanced Zone Private Zone TREES X Acacia abyssinica Abyssinian Acacia 20’-25’ 20-25’ M x x X Acacia aneura Mulga 20’ 12’ M x x X Acacia berlandieri Berlandier Acacia 15’ 15’ S x x X Acacia constricta Whitethorn Acacia 10’ 15’ S x x x X Acacia craspedocarpa Leatherleaf Acacia 18’ 10’ M x x X Acacia crassifolia Butterfly-leaf Acacia 10’-15’ 10’-15’ S x x X Acacia gerrardii Gray-thorn Acacia 25’ 25’ M x x X Acacia greggii Catclaw Acacia 10’ 15’ S x x x x X Acacia rigidula Black-brush acacia 10’-15’ 7’-9’ S x April24,2015 October21,2005,revised Design,LLC.,andDCRanchLLC.Allrightsreserved. ©2005 DaleGardon X Acacia roemeriana Roemer Acacia 20’ 25’ M x X Acacia saligna Willow Acacia 15’-25’ 10’-20’ M x X Acacia schaffneri Twisted Acacia 15’-25’ 15’-25’ M x X Acacia smallii (farnesiana) Sweet Acacia 15’-20’ 15’-20’ M x x x X Acacia tortillia Umbrella Thorn 20’-30’ 30’ L x X Acacia willardiana Palo Blanco 20’ 10’ M x x Albizia julibrissin Mimosa 20’-40’ 40’ L x Apple ‘Anna’ Anna Apple Tree 15’ 15’ S x X Bauhinia congesta Anacacho Orchid Tree 6’-12’ 6’-12’ S x X Bauhinia congesta ‘Lunarioides’ Pink Orchid Tree 6’-12’ 6’-12’ S x X Caesalpinia cacalaco Cascalote 15’-20’ 15’ M x x X Caesalpinia mexicana Mexican Bird of Paradise 10’-15’ 6’-12’ S x x X Canotia holacantha Crucifixion Thorn 15’ 10’ S x x x X Cercidium ‘Desert Museum’ Hybrid Palo Verde 25’ 15’ M x x x X Cercidium floridum Blue Palo Verde 30’ 30’-40’ L x x x x Cercidium microphyllum Foothills Palo Verde 20’ 25’ M x x x x X Cercidium praecox Palo Brea 20’ 25’ M x x x X Cercis canadensis v.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0263516 A1 CYR (43) Pub
    US 20090263516A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0263516 A1 CYR (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 22, 2009 (54) PLANT EXTRACT COMPOSITION AND Publication Classification THEIR USE TO MODULATE CELLULAR (51) Int. Cl. ACTIVITY A636/8962 (2006.01) A636/00 (2006.01) (75) Inventor: Benoit CYR, St. Augustin de A6IP35/00 (2006.01) Desmaures (CA) CI2N 5/06 (2006.01) Correspondence Address: A6IR 36/3 (2006.01) SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON A 6LX 36/899 (2006.01) LLP (52) U.S. Cl. ......... 424/754; 424/725; 435/375; 424/774; 990 Marsh Road 424/779; 424/755; 424/750; 424/777 Menlo Park, CA 94025 (US) (57) ABSTRACT (73) Assignee: Biopharmacopae Design Extracts from plant material, or semi-purified/purified mol International Inc., Saint-Foy (CA) ecules or compounds prepared from the extracts that demon strate the ability to modulate one or more cellular activities (21) Appl. No.: 12/263,114 are provided. The extracts are capable of slowing down, inhibiting or preventing cell migration, for example, the (22) Filed: Oct. 31, 2008 migration of endothelial cells or neoplastic cells and thus, the use of the extracts to slow down, inhibit or prevent abnormal Related U.S. Application Data cell migration in an animal is also provided. Methods of selecting and preparing the plant extracts and methods of (63) Continuation of application No. 10/526,387, filed on screening the extracts to determine their ability to modulate Oct. 6, 2005, now abandoned, filed as application No. one or more cellular activity are described. The purification or PCT/CA03/01284 on Sep.
    [Show full text]
  • Seedimages Species Database List
    Seedimages.com Scientific List (possibly A. cylindrica) Agropyron trachycaulum Ambrosia artemisifolia (R) not Abelmoschus esculentus Agrostemma githago a synonym of A. trifida Abies concolor Agrostis alba Ambrosia confertiflora Abronia villosa Agrostis canina Ambrosia dumosa Abronia villosum Agrostis capillaris Ambrosia grayi Abutilon theophrasti Agrostis exarata Ambrosia psilostachya Acacia mearnsii Agrostis gigantea Ambrosia tomentosa Acaena anserinifolia Agrostis palustris Ambrosia trifida (L) Acaena novae-zelandiae Agrostis stolonifera Ammi majus Acaena sanguisorbae Agrostis tenuis Ammobium alatum Acalypha virginica Aira caryophyllea Amorpha canescens Acamptopappus sphaerocephalus Alcea ficifolia Amsinckia intermedia Acanthospermum hispidum Alcea nigra Amsinckia tessellata Acer rubrum Alcea rosea Anagallis arvensis Achillea millifolium Alchemilla mollis Anagallis monellii Achnatherum brachychaetum Alectra arvensis Anaphalis margaritacea Achnatherum hymenoides Alectra aspera Andropogon bicornis Acmella oleracea Alectra fluminensis Andropogon flexuosus Acroptilon repens Alectra melampyroides Andropogon gerardii Actaea racemosa Alhagi camelorum Andropogon gerardii var. Adenostoma fasciculatum Alhagi maurorum paucipilus Aegilops cylindrica Alhagi pseudalhagi Andropogon hallii Aegilops geniculata subsp. Allium canadense Andropogon ternarius geniculata Allium canadense (bulb) Andropogon virginicus Aegilops ovata Allium cepa Anemone canadensis Aegilops triuncialis Allium cernuum Anemone cylindrica Aeginetia indica Allium fistulosum Anemone
    [Show full text]
  • List of Approved Plants
    APPENDIX "X" – PLANT LISTS Appendix "X" Contains Three (3) Plant Lists: X.1. List of Approved Indigenous Plants Allowed in any Landscape Zone. X.2. List of Approved Non-Indigenous Plants Allowed ONLY in the Private Zone or Semi-Private Zone. X.3. List of Prohibited Plants Prohibited for any location on a residential Lot. X.1. LIST OF APPROVED INDIGENOUS PLANTS. Approved Indigenous Plants may be used in any of the Landscape Zones on a residential lot. ONLY approved indigenous plants may be used in the Native Zone and the Revegetation Zone for those landscape areas located beyond the perimeter footprint of the home and site walls. The density, ratios, and mix of any added indigenous plant material should approximate those found in the general area of the native undisturbed desert. Refer to Section 8.4 and 8.5 of the Design Guidelines for an explanation and illustration of the Native Zone and the Revegetation Zone. For clarity, Approved Indigenous Plants are considered those plant species that are specifically indigenous and native to Desert Mountain. While there may be several other plants that are native to the upper Sonoran Desert, this list is specific to indigenous and native plants within Desert Mountain. X.1.1. Indigenous Trees: COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME Blue Palo Verde Parkinsonia florida Crucifixion Thorn Canotia holacantha Desert Hackberry Celtis pallida Desert Willow / Desert Catalpa Chilopsis linearis Foothills Palo Verde Parkinsonia microphylla Net Leaf Hackberry Celtis reticulata One-Seed Juniper Juniperus monosperma Velvet Mesquite / Native Mesquite Prosopis velutina (juliflora) X.1.2. Indigenous Shrubs: COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME Anderson Thornbush Lycium andersonii Barberry Berberis haematocarpa Bear Grass Nolina microcarpa Brittle Bush Encelia farinosa Page X - 1 Approved - February 24, 2020 Appendix X Landscape Guidelines Bursage + Ambrosia deltoidea + Canyon Ragweed Ambrosia ambrosioides Catclaw Acacia / Wait-a-Minute Bush Acacia greggii / Senegalia greggii Catclaw Mimosa Mimosa aculeaticarpa var.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List
    Arizona Department of Water Resources Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Official Regulatory List for the Phoenix Active Management Area Fourth Management Plan Arizona Department of Water Resources 1110 West Washington St. Ste. 310 Phoenix, AZ 85007 www.azwater.gov 602-771-8585 Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Acknowledgements The Phoenix AMA list was prepared in 2004 by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) in cooperation with the Landscape Technical Advisory Committee of the Arizona Municipal Water Users Association, comprised of experts from the Desert Botanical Garden, the Arizona Department of Transporation and various municipal, nursery and landscape specialists. ADWR extends its gratitude to the following members of the Plant List Advisory Committee for their generous contribution of time and expertise: Rita Jo Anthony, Wild Seed Judy Mielke, Logan Simpson Design John Augustine, Desert Tree Farm Terry Mikel, U of A Cooperative Extension Robyn Baker, City of Scottsdale Jo Miller, City of Glendale Louisa Ballard, ASU Arboritum Ron Moody, Dixileta Gardens Mike Barry, City of Chandler Ed Mulrean, Arid Zone Trees Richard Bond, City of Tempe Kent Newland, City of Phoenix Donna Difrancesco, City of Mesa Steve Priebe, City of Phornix Joe Ewan, Arizona State University Janet Rademacher, Mountain States Nursery Judy Gausman, AZ Landscape Contractors Assn. Rick Templeton, City of Phoenix Glenn Fahringer, Earth Care Cathy Rymer, Town of Gilbert Cheryl Goar, Arizona Nurssery Assn. Jeff Sargent, City of Peoria Mary Irish, Garden writer Mark Schalliol, ADOT Matt Johnson, U of A Desert Legum Christy Ten Eyck, Ten Eyck Landscape Architects Jeff Lee, City of Mesa Gordon Wahl, ADWR Kirti Mathura, Desert Botanical Garden Karen Young, Town of Gilbert Cover Photo: Blooming Teddy bear cholla (Cylindropuntia bigelovii) at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monutment.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Biodiversity Report
    FINAL Baseline Biodiversity Survey for Potrero Mason Property Prepared for: County of San Diego Department of Parks and Recreation 5500 Overland Avenue Drive, Suite 410 San Diego, California 92123 Contact: Jennifer Price Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 Contact: Brock Ortega DECEMBER 2012 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Final Baseline Biodiversity Survey Potrero Mason Property TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................ V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................VII 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose of the Report.............................................................................................. 1 1.2 MSCP Context ........................................................................................................ 1 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ...........................................................................................9 2.1 Project Location ...................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Geographical Setting ............................................................................................... 9 2.3 Geology and Soils ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Whipple Mountains
    $5.00 (Free to Members) VOL. 35, NO. 1 • WINTER 2007 FREMONTIA JOURNAL OF THE CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY FLORA OF THE WHIPPLE MOUNTAINS— THE “NOSE” OF CALIFORNIA INVASIVEINVASIVE PLANTSPLANTS IMPACTIMPACT TRADITIONALTRADITIONAL BASKETRY PLANTS NATIVE GRASSES IN THE GARDEN REMEMBERING GRADY WEBSTER BUCKEYEVOLUME 35:1, AS WINTERBONSAI 2007 AN ORCHID IN SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY FREMONTIA CNPS, 2707 K Street, Suite 1; Sacramento, CA 95816-5113 Phone: (916) 447-CNPS (2677) Fax: (916) 447-2727 VOL. 35, NO. 1, WINTER 2007 Web site: www.cnps.org Email: [email protected] Copyright © 2007 MEMBERSHIP California Native Plant Society Membership form located on inside back cover; dues include subscriptions to Fremontia and the Bulletin Bart O’Brien, Editor Bob Hass, Copy Editor Mariposa Lily . $1,500 Family or Group . $75 Benefactor . $600 International . $75 Beth Hansen-Winter, Designer Patron . $300 Individual or Library . $45 Brad Jenkins, Jake Sigg, and Carol Plant Lover . $100 Student/Retired/Limited Income . $25 Witham, Proofreaders STAFF CHAPTER COUNCIL CALIFORNIA NATIVE Sacramento Office: Alta Peak (Tulare) . Joan Stewart PLANT SOCIETY Executive Director . Amanda Jorgenson Bristlecone (Inyo-Mono) . Sherryl Taylor Development Director/Finance Channel Islands . Lynne Kada Dedicated to the Preservation of Manager . Cari Porter the California Native Flora Dorothy King Young (Mendocino/ Membership Assistant . Christina Sonoma Coast) . Lori Hubbart The California Native Plant Society Neifer East Bay . Elaine P. Jackson (CNPS) is a statewide nonprofit organi- El Dorado . Amy Hoffman zation dedicated to increasing the un- At Large: Kern County . Lucy Clark derstanding and appreciation of Califor- Fremontia Editor . Bart O’Brien Los Angeles/Santa Monica Mtns .
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Clickbook Booklet
    139 Oroba Orobanche cooperi Cooper's broomrape 2 Flora of Southeast Santa Rosa Mountains 140 Papav Eschscholzia minutiflora ssp. minutiflora small-flowered poppy 1 99 141 Papav Eschscholzia parishii Parish's poppy 3 99 # Famil Scientific Name (*)Common Name #V#Pls 142 Plant Mohavea confertiflora ghost flower 1 53 1 Pteri Cheilanthes parryi woolly lipfern 99 143 Plant Plantago ovata desert plantain 1 99 2 Pteri Notholaena californica ssp. californica California cloak fern 4 144 Polem Aliciella latifolia ssp. latifolia broad-leaf gilia 1 97 3 Ephed Ephedra aspera Mormon tea 99 145 Polem Eriastrum eremicum ssp. eremicum desert woolly-star 99 Eudicots 146 Polem Gilia stellata star gilia 2 43 4 Amara Tidestromia suffruticosa var. oblongifolia Arizona honeysweet 1 147 Polem Langloisia setosissima ssp. setosissima bristly langloisia 9 5 Apiac Tauschia arguta southern tauschia 2 148 Polem Linanthus jonesii Jones' linanthus 8 6 Apocy Asclepias albicans white-stemmed milkweed 1 3 149 Polem Loeseliastrum matthewsii desert calico 1 20 7 Apocy Asclepias subulata rush milkweed 3 18 150 Polem Loeseliastrum schottii Schott's calico 15 8 Apocy Funastrum hirtellum rambling milkweed 99 151 Polyg Chorizanthe brevicornu var. brevicornu brittle spineflower 1 99 Acamptopappus sphaerocephalus var. 9 Aster goldenhead 2 152 Polyg Chorizanthe rigida devil's spineflower 46 sphaerocephalus 153 Polyg Eriogonum deflexum var. deflexum flat-topped buckwheat 20 10 Aster Adenophyllum porophylloides San Felipe dogweed 11 154 Polyg Eriogonum fasciculatum var. polifolium California buckwheat 9 11 Aster Ambrosia dumosa burroweed 99 155 Polyg Eriogonum inflatum desert trumpet 2 99 12 Aster Ambrosia salsola var. salsola cheesebush 2 99 156 Polyg Eriogonum thomasii Thomas' buckwheat 99 13 Aster Bahiopsis parishii Parish's goldeneye 4 157 Polyg Eriogonum wrightii var.
    [Show full text]
  • US Air Force Pollinator Conservation Reference Guide – Appendix B
    Dr U.S. Air Force Pollinator Conservation Reference Guide – Appendix B: Restoration and landscaping information Photo: Jim Hudgins/USFWS CC BY 2.0 2017 U.S. Air Force Pollinator Conservation Reference Guide Appendix B: Restoration and landscaping information Prepared for U.S. Air Force Civil Engineer Center Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Recommended citation: USFWS. 2017. U.S. Air Force Pollinator Conservation Reference Guide, Appendix B: Restoration and landscaping information, Air Force Civil Engineer Center, San Antonio, TX, 209 pp. Page i ABBREVIATIONS Light preference S=full sun (6 or more hours per day direct sunlight during growing season) PS=part shade (3 to 6 hours per day direct sunlight during growing season) Sh=Shade (less than 3 hours per day direct sunlight during growing season or filtered light) Soil moisture D=dry (areas that do not remain wet after rain) M=moist (areas with damp and occasionally saturated soils) W=wet (areas saturated during most of the growing season) Bloom time Jan = January Feb = February Mar = March Apr = April May = May Jun = June Jul = July Aug = August Sep = September Oct = October Nov = November Dec = December Bloom color B=blue Br=brown G=Green O=orange Pi=Pink Pu=purple R=red Y=yellow W=white Height " = inches ' = feet Page ii Suitable for landscaping Y=yes (based on appearance; note: some plants, even those common in home gardens, are toxic) N=no ND = not determined Other AFB = Air Force Base FS = Forest Service P2 = Pollinator Partnership NAPPC = North American Pollinator Protection Campaign NRCS = Natural Resource Conservation Service USDA = U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle Mountain Report Covers.Indd
    Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Pre-Application Document Volume 1, Public Information FERC Project No. 12509 January 2008 Submitted by: Eagle Crest Energy, P.O. Box 2155, Palm Desert, CA 92261 ©2008 Eagle Crest Energy Submitted by: Eagle Crest Energy, P.O. Box 2155, Palm Desert, CA 92261 ©2008 Eagle Crest Energy Prepared by: GEI Consultants, Inc. 10860 Gold Center Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Pre-Application Document FERC Project No. 12509 Submitted by: Eagle Crest Energy, P.O. Box 2155, Palm Desert, CA 92261 ©2008 Eagle Crest Energy Prepared by: GEI Consultants, Inc 10860 Gold Center Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Date: January 2008 EAGLE MOUNTAIN PUMPED STORAGE PRE-APPLICATION DOCUMENT Table of Contents Table of Contents i 1 Introduction 1-1 2 Process Plan and Schedule 2-1 3 Project Location, Facilities, and Operations 3-1 3.1 Existing and Proposed Project Facilities 3-1 3.2 Current and Proposed Operations 3-13 3.3 Existing License 3-15 3.4 Plans for Future Development or Changes 3-15 4 Existing Environment and Resource Impacts 4-1 4.1 General Basin Description 4-1 4.2 Geology and Soils 4-3 4.2.1 Data or Studies Summaries 4-3 4.2.2 Description of Environment 4-4 4.2.2.1 General Geologic Setting 4-4 4.2.2.2 Project Area Geology 4-5 4.2.2.3 Formational Rock Stratigraphy 4-5 4.2.2.4 Surficial Deposits 4-7 4.2.2.5 Geologic Structures 4-9 4.2.2.6 Mineral Resources 4-9 4.2.2.7 Iron Ore Resources 4-10 4.2.2.8 Soil Resources 4-10 4.2.2.9 Earthquakes and Faults 4-13 4.2.2.10 Regional Faults 4-13 4.2.2.11
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenix AMA LWUPL
    Arizona Department of Water Resources Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Official Regulatory List for the Phoenix Active Management Area Fourth Management Plan Arizona Department of Water Resources 1110 West Washington St. Ste. 310 Phoenix, AZ 85007 www.azwater.gov 602-771-8585 Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Acknowledgements The Phoenix AMA list was prepared in 2004 by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) in cooperation with the Landscape Technical Advisory Committee of the Arizona Municipal Water Users Association, comprised of experts from the Desert Botanical Garden, the Arizona Department of Transporation and various municipal, nursery and landscape specialists. ADWR extends its gratitude to the following members of the Plant List Advisory Committee for their generous contribution of time and expertise: Rita Jo Anthony, Wild Seed Judy Mielke, Logan Simpson Design John Augustine, Desert Tree Farm Terry Mikel, U of A Cooperative Extension Robyn Baker, City of Scottsdale Jo Miller, City of Glendale Louisa Ballard, ASU Arboritum Ron Moody, Dixileta Gardens Mike Barry, City of Chandler Ed Mulrean, Arid Zone Trees Richard Bond, City of Tempe Kent Newland, City of Phoenix Donna Difrancesco, City of Mesa Steve Priebe, City of Phornix Joe Ewan, Arizona State University Janet Rademacher, Mountain States Nursery Judy Gausman, AZ Landscape Contractors Assn. Rick Templeton, City of Phoenix Glenn Fahringer, Earth Care Cathy Rymer, Town of Gilbert Cheryl Goar, Arizona Nurssery Assn. Jeff Sargent, City of Peoria Mary Irish, Garden writer Mark Schalliol, ADOT Matt Johnson, U of A Desert Legum Christy Ten Eyck, Ten Eyck Landscape Architects Jeff Lee, City of Mesa Gordon Wahl, ADWR Kirti Mathura, Desert Botanical Garden Karen Young, Town of Gilbert Cover Photo: Blooming Teddy bear cholla (Cylindropuntia bigelovii) at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monutment.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Phase II Report
    Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Phase II Report By Dr. Terri Hildebrand Southern Utah University, Cedar City, UT and Dr. Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting, Kanab, UT Colorado Plateau Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Agreement # H1200-09-0005 1 May 2012 Prepared for Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Southern Utah University National Park Service Mojave Network TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Introduction . 4 Study Area . 6 History and Setting . 6 Geology and Associated Ecoregions . 6 Soils and Climate . 7 Vegetation . 10 Previous Botanical Studies . 11 Methods . 17 Results . 21 Discussion . 28 Conclusions . 32 Acknowledgments . 33 Literature Cited . 34 Figures Figure 1. Location of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 5 Figure 2. Ecoregions and 2010-2011 collection sites in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 8 Figure 3. Soil types and 2010-2011 collection sites in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 9 Figure 4. Increase in the number of plant taxa confirmed as present in Grand Canyon- Parashant National Monument by decade, 1900-2011 . 13 Figure 5. Southern Utah University students enrolled in the 2010 Plant Anatomy and Diversity course that collected during the 30 August 2010 experiential learning event . 18 Figure 6. 2010-2011 collection sites and transportation routes in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 22 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Tables Table 1. Chronology of plant-collecting efforts at Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument . 14 Table 2. Data fields in the annotated checklist of the flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument (Appendices A, B, C, and D) .
    [Show full text]