BLUMEA VOL. 23, No. 1, 1976 18 Coryphopteris Gymnopoda (Baker

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BLUMEA VOL. 23, No. 1, 1976 18 Coryphopteris Gymnopoda (Baker BLUMEA VOL. No. 1976 18 23, 1, of Mt. Kinabalu Coryphopteris gymnopoda (Baker) Holttum. Plant growing on the Kamborangah ridge at this R. E. 2200m, showing the arborescent habit characteristic of genus (phot. Holttum, 1972). BLUMEA 23 (1976) 18—47 Studies in the family Thelypteridaceae X. Thegenus Coryphopteris R.E. Holttum Summary known of this with for and for identification. All species genus are described, synonymy each a key Seventeen new species are described: C. andersonii, C. andreae, C. arthrotricha, C. atjehensis, C. athyrioides, C. borealis, C. brevipilosa, C. hubrechtensis, C. iwatsukii, C. kolombangarae, C. meiobasis, C. microlepigera, C. seemannii, C. C. tahanensis, C. C. vitiensis. Allother C. subbipinnata, tanggamensis, species, except hirsutipes, and C. C. viscosa are transferred from other to Coryphopteris. The following names are pectiniformis , , genera A. D. indochinensis D. A. reduced to synonymy: Dryopteris megalocarpa v. v. R., Chr., subviscosa v. v. R., C. kinabaluensis linearis D. supravillosa Chr., D. Copel., D. Copel.,D. villosipes Gepp, D. rigidifolia v. A. v. R.; Lastrea ridleyi Bedd., L. robinsonii Ridl.; Nephrodium macgregorii Bak.; Thelypteris angulariloba Ching, T. simozawae Tagawa, T. herbacea Holttum, T. subglanduligera Ching. New varieties are described in C. viscosa, C. gymnopoda, C. pectiniformis, and C. pubirachis. Coryphopteris Coryphopteris Holttum, Blumea 19 (1971) 33. — Parathelypteris sect. Melanostipes Ching, Acta Phytotax. Sinica 8 (1963) 301, p.p. Caudex erect, commonly 15—30 cm tall, bearing roots throughout as in Cyathea, hairs stipes dark throughout or paler distally, in a few species bearing spreading septate with rather broad which near the base, always scales in most species lack acicular hairs. Lamina commonly 20—40 cm long, rarely to 80 cm, apex never pinna-like; lowest pinnae not or little reduced (several pairs gradually much reduced in C. fasciculata and narrowed towards their and wider C. squamipes), bases often at their middle than other basal lobeoften and pinnae, acroscopic enlarged dentatewith some forked veins, sometimes free; aerophores at bases of pinnae somewhat swollen; pinnae always deeply lobed, one basal both basal or more lobes sometimes free; veins in lobes simple or rarely once forked, veins to edge above base of sinus; lower surface of rachis, costae, costules, and veins reduced scales acicular hairs always bearing (smallest filiform); spreading usually present on lower surface of axes of frond (sometimes replaced by short capitate hairs), in some hairs which be sessile resinous cases longer may septate; glands (which may collapse on abundant lower drying) in many species ± on surfaces; costa always grooved on upper surface; hairs on upper surface of rachis and costae always acicular, normally unicellular, few sessile acicular hairs in a species septate; glands or capitate or sometimes present on veins. upper surface between Sori usually with rather large indusia (absent in C. engleriana) which be distal may glandular or hairy, sori (rarely all) sometimes ± asymmetric as in hairs Athyrium; sporangia short-stalked, never with glands or near annulus, sometimes IX in —68. *) Kalikasan 4, 1 (1975) 47 ") 50 Gloucester Court, Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3EA, England. BLUMEA VOL. No. 20 23, 1, 1976 this with a sessile gland on the stalk (in C. badia non-glandular hairs of several cells in continuous and a few position); spores usually pale, translucent, with a ± wing cross- wings (in C. klossii many small wings). I.e. Type species: Coryphopteris viscosa (Baker) Holttum, 1971. Distribution: mountains of the Malayan region (except Java and the Lesser Sunda Islands) and some island-groups of the Pacific including New Caledonia; N. E. India to southern China and Japan. Fl. Cytology: 11=32 (1(C. pectiniformis; Manton in Holttum, Rev. Malaya 2, 1955: 624, fig. 8.). I with In 1971 (I.e. pp. 18, 19) compared Thelypteridaceae Cyathea (sensu lato), pointing in out similarities. Assuming the relationship to be a real one, the following characters in of Coryphopteris maybe regarded as primitive: erect caudex; presence some species almost sessile without septateacicular hairs on upper surface of rachis and costae; sporangia annulus. Plants of all small appendages near species are in stature, with simply pinnate all fronds (partly bipinnate in C. habbemensisand C. stereophylla in New Guinea) and, as in than that of But of all the Old Thelypteridaceae, a much simpler vascular system Cyathea. World members of look like — a Thelypteridaceae they to me most a primitive group has the buthas uniform group which doubtless changed in course of evolution preserved a arborescent habit. In the New World and Africa the comparable genus is Amauropelta of which similar in habit Kunze, most species are very to Coryphopteris though they and mostly have gradually reduced lower pinnae a few have developed a prostrate rhizome. distinct shown for Amauropelta certainly represents a quite evolutionary line, as the other Old World of the example by its peculiar spores. Among genera family as few have is such habit recognized by me in 1971, species ofarborescent habit, and in none in of The which alone in present a majority species. genus Trigonospora, Thelypteridaceae has caudex has trilete spores, uniformly a short erect which never attains any considerable rocks in height. This is doubtless dueto the peculiar habitat ofall species, which grow on stream-beds liable with and beside where plants are to periodic flooding swiftly-flowing water. The African Menisorus is related and has a similar habitat. The habitat of Coryphopteris is also distinctivebut quite different, being confined to the of — rather low (sometimes mossy) forest of the crests ridges of higher mountains (1000 mineral- 3000 m altitude) where the soil is much leached and plants needto be adapted to a that deficient water-supply and probably also to high acidity. It is notable no species ash occur in Java, where all high mountains are volcanoes and where volcanic replenishes all the mineral nutrients in almost soils. It may be that Coryphopteris owes its survival to this adaptation, which allows its species to flourish under conditions where few other of where mountains of plants can compete. In the Pacific, species Coryphopteris only occur sufficient height and age provide the right soil conditions (Solomons, Fiji, Samoa, New Caledonia, Marquesas, Tahiti, Austral Islands). The with their 47 species here recognized are nearly all Malesian, greatest diversity where there the of in New Guinea, is greatest development high mountains. It is quite been col- possible that further new species exist in all the islands; these plants have rarely lected with sufficient attention to detail. In mainland Asia there is only one variable species (C. hirsutipes) which is widely distributed, and C. petelotii which appears to be a distinct local ally in Tonkin. But in mainland Asia also there other species included in and Parathelypteris by Ching; these have slender creeping rhizomes, but sporangia spores similar of lamina the to those Coryphopteris. The sessile glands on the of two genera have rather different them a aspect, but to distinguish clearly would need more recondite techniques than are available to the herbarium botanist. I do not doubt that Parathelypteris R. E. Holttum: Coryphopteris 21 and related (as typified by P. glanduligera Ching) Coryphopteris are genera. The American species Thelypteris simulata (Davenp.) Nieuwl., certainly close to P. glanduligera, has & A. Amer. Fern agreeing with the n=32 (R. M. Tryon, Journ. 63, 1973: 68), only of and observation on a species Coryphopteris. But Parathelypteris beddomei (Baker) Ching P. nipponica (Fr. & Sav.) Ching have a different frond-form and the former has a different chromosomenumber n=3i. Coryphopteris plants mostly grow in places which are only accessible by much physical and of exist in visited effort, probably most those that are places never yet by botanical collectors. Anyone who wished to make a general study of them would need to be very also have for his energetic and considerable resources travel at disposal. But some localities be where they exist (notably in Malaya) are easily accessible and it is to hoped that their be peculiar habitat-conditions, and their response to such conditions, may studied. Owing to their peculiar needs, which are not yet understood, no plants have ever made new growth when transplanted to Kew. Attempts to establish them in cultivation would have to be made near a natural habitat, and perhaps would only be successful when some of of the habitat the the more important characteristics are understood, especially acidity and mineral content of the soil water. C. in sometimes the At least one species, badia, grows (always?) moss-cushions, on branches of small trees in the dwarf moss-forest of high ridges, and plants of several The of badia covered species have been found as epiphytes. bases stipes of C. are with from and the slender hairs which seem indistinguishable root-hairs, probably have same function; they are slender, shrivelled but glossy golden brown when dry, with usually C. in few irregular septa (the sporangia of badia are also peculiar having non-glandular hairs of several cells on their stalks). It is possible that 'root-hairs' occur on the bases of when the I noted this stipes of other species plants grow in moss, though have not in The much almost white and herbarium specimens. stouter multiseptate hairs, opaque, few other do which occur at the bases of stipes in a species (see key) perhaps not have function of C. similar but hairs the same as the hairs badia; shorter occur on the upper of fronds of some of these parts plants. Plants of this have much in genus the same general aspect all species, whetherliving or as dried specimens, and it is not easy to see how to distinguish clearly between species, distinct exist. Basal though undoubtedly many species pinnae are always deflexed (this is characters not an artefact due to drying for the herbarium).
Recommended publications
  • THELYPTERIS SUBG. AMAUROPELTA (THELYPTERIDACEAE) DA ESTAÇÃO ECOLÓGICA DO PANGA, UBERLÂNDIA, MINAS GERAIS, BRASIL Adriana A
    THELYPTERIS SUBG. AMAUROPELTA (THELYPTERIDACEAE) DA ESTAÇÃO ECOLÓGICA DO PANGA, UBERLÂNDIA, MINAS GERAIS, BRASIL Adriana A. Arantes1, Jefferson Prado2 & Marli A. Ranal1 RESUMO (Thelypteris subg. Amauropelta (Thelypteridaceae) da Estação Ecológica do Panga, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brasil) O presente trabalho apresenta o tratamento taxonômico para as espécies de Thelypteris subgênero Amauropelta que ocorrem na Estação Ecológica do Panga. Thelypteridaceae mostrou-se uma das mais representativas da pteridoflora local, com 14 espécies de Thelypteris segregadas em quatro subgêneros (Amauropelta, Cyclosorus, Goniopteris e Meniscium). Na área de estudo, o subgênero Amauropelta está representado por quatro espécies, Thelypteris heineri, T. mosenii, T. opposita e T. rivularioides. São apresentadas descrições, chave para identificação das espécies, comentários, distribuição geográfica e ilustrações dos caracteres diagnósticos. Palavras-chave: samambaias, Pteridophyta, cerrado, flora, taxonomia. ABSTRACT (Thelypteris subg. Amauropelta (Thelypteridaceae) of the Ecological Station of Panga, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais State, Brazil) This paper provides the taxonomic treatment for the species of Thelypteris subgenus Amauropelta in the Ecological Station of Panga. Thelypteridaceae is one of the richest families in the area, with 14 species of Thelypteris segregated in four subgenera (Amauropelta, Cyclosorus, Goniopteris, and Meniscium). In the area the subgenus Amauropelta is represented by four species, Thelypteris heineri, T. mosenii, T. opposita, and
    [Show full text]
  • Thelypteroid Comprising Species Chiefly Regions. These Family, Its
    BLUMEA 27(1981) 239-254 Comparative morphologyof the gametophyteof some Thelypteroidferns Tuhinsri Sen Department of Botany, Kalyani University, Kalyani 741235, West Bengal, India. Abstract A study of the developmentofthe gametophytes of sixteen thelypteroidferns reveals similarities and differences them. Combinations of the diversified features of the significant among prothalli appear to identification delimitation of the taxa, and the views of have a tremendous impact on and major support those authors who the taxonomic of these ferns. propose segregation Introduction The thelypteroid ferns comprising about one thousand species are chiefly inhabitants the and few of them in These of tropics only a occur temperate regions. plants are exceptionally varied in structure, yet they constitute a natural family, its members being easily distinguishable by their foliar acicular hairs, cauline scales with marginal and superficial appendages, and two hippocampus type of petiolar fern this bundles. It is certainly significant that no other has assemblage of vegetative characters. A critical survey through the literaturereveals that probably in no other group of ferns the generic concept of the taxonomists is so highly in the and Reed assembled all contrasting as thelypteroids. Morton (1963) (1968) the thelypteroids in a single genus, Thelypteris. Iwatsuki (1964) on the other hand, subdivided them into three genera. Copeland (1947) recognised eight genera (including with them the unrelated Currania) while Christensen (1938) tentatively suggested about twelve. Pichi Sermolli (1970) stated that no less than eighteen have to be and increased this numberto in 1977 genera kept distinct, thirtytwo (Pichi Sermolli, 1977); Ching (1963) maintainednineteen genera in Asia. Holttum (1971), Old in his new system of genera in the World Thelypteridaceae circumscribed twentythree genera.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora Del Valle De Lerma Thelypteridaceae Ching Ex Pic.Serm
    APORTES BOTÁNICOS DE SALTA - Ser. Flora HERBARIO MCNS FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS NATURALES UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE SALTA Buenos Aires 177 - 4400 Salta - República Argentina ISSN 0327 – 506X Vol. 8 Diciembre 2008 Nº 14 Edición Internet Mayo 2012 FLORA DEL VALLE DE LERMA T H E L Y P T E R I D A C E A E Ching ex Pic.Serm. Mónica Ponce1 2 Olga Gladys Martínez Rizomas erectos o rastreros, con escamas en general pubescentes, con abundantes raíces fibrosas o raramente raíces gruesas, dictiostélicos. Frondes de 0,5- 2,5 m long., monomórficas a subdimórficas, vernación circinada; pecíolos no articulados al rizoma, con 2 haces vasculares lunulados en la base, unidos distalmente en uno en forma de U; láminas comúnmente pinnadas o pinnado- pinnatífidas, rara vez simples o 2 (3)-pinnadas, raquis y costas adaxialmente surcados, surcos no continuos entre sí, venación libre a totalmente anastomosada, las aréolas sin venas incluidas o con una única venilla excurrente, indumento de pelos aciculares, furcados a ramificados, capitado-glandulares, 1-pluricelulares, menos frecuentemente escamas pequeñas sobre los ejes, nunca sobre la lámina; soros circulares o elípticos sobre venas laterales, o arqueados sobre venillas transversales, indusios comúnmente orbicular-reniformes a espatulares, en ocasiones reducidos o ausentes; esporangios con 3 hileras de células en el pie, a veces con pelos en la cápsula o en el pie; esporas monoletes, perisporio reticulado, crestado, alado, o menos frecuentemente equinado. x= 27, 29-36. 1 Instituto de Botánica Darwinion. Labardén 200. Casilla de Correo 22. B1642HYD San Isidro, Buenos Aires, Argentina. [email protected] 2 Herbario MCNS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ferns and Their Relatives (Lycophytes)
    N M D R maidenhair fern Adiantum pedatum sensitive fern Onoclea sensibilis N D N N D D Christmas fern Polystichum acrostichoides bracken fern Pteridium aquilinum N D P P rattlesnake fern (top) Botrychium virginianum ebony spleenwort Asplenium platyneuron walking fern Asplenium rhizophyllum bronze grapefern (bottom) B. dissectum v. obliquum N N D D N N N R D D broad beech fern Phegopteris hexagonoptera royal fern Osmunda regalis N D N D common woodsia Woodsia obtusa scouring rush Equisetum hyemale adder’s tongue fern Ophioglossum vulgatum P P P P N D M R spinulose wood fern (left & inset) Dryopteris carthusiana marginal shield fern (right & inset) Dryopteris marginalis narrow-leaved glade fern Diplazium pycnocarpon M R N N D D purple cliff brake Pellaea atropurpurea shining fir moss Huperzia lucidula cinnamon fern Osmunda cinnamomea M R N M D R Appalachian filmy fern Trichomanes boschianum rock polypody Polypodium virginianum T N J D eastern marsh fern Thelypteris palustris silvery glade fern Deparia acrostichoides southern running pine Diphasiastrum digitatum T N J D T T black-footed quillwort Isoëtes melanopoda J Mexican mosquito fern Azolla mexicana J M R N N P P D D northern lady fern Athyrium felix-femina slender lip fern Cheilanthes feei net-veined chain fern Woodwardia areolata meadow spike moss Selaginella apoda water clover Marsilea quadrifolia Polypodiaceae Polypodium virginanum Dryopteris carthusiana he ferns and their relatives (lycophytes) living today give us a is tree shows a current concept of the Dryopteridaceae Dryopteris marginalis is poster made possible by: { Polystichum acrostichoides T evolutionary relationships among Onocleaceae Onoclea sensibilis glimpse of what the earth’s vegetation looked like hundreds of Blechnaceae Woodwardia areolata Illinois fern ( green ) and lycophyte Thelypteridaceae Phegopteris hexagonoptera millions of years ago when they were the dominant plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Plant Species
    1 02 NCAC 48F is amended with changes as published in 35:07 NCR 736-754 as follows: 2 3 SECTION .0300 - ENDANGERED PLANT SPECIES LIST: THREATENED PLANT SPECIES LIST: LIST 4 OF SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN 5 6 02 NCAC 48F .0301 PROTECTED PLANT SPECIES LIST 7 The North Carolina Plant Conservation Board hereby establishes the following list of protected plant species (** 8 indicates federally listed): 9 10 Species Status 11 (1) Acmispon helleri Threatened 12 Carolina Prairie-trefoil; 13 (1)(2) Acrobolbus ciliatus Special Concern, Vulnerable 14 A liverwort; 15 (2)(3) Adiantum capillus-veneris Threatened 16 Venus Hair Fern; 17 (3)(4) Adlumia fungosa Special Concern, Vulnerable 18 Climbing Fumitory; 19 (4)(5) Aeschynomene virginica** Threatened 20 Sensitive Jointvetch; 21 (5)(6) Agalinis virgata Threatened 22 Branched Gerardia; 23 (6)(7) Agrostis mertensii Endangered 24 Artic Arctic Bentgrass; 25 (8) Aletris lutea Threatened 26 Yellow Colic-root; 27 (9) Allium allegheniense Special Concern, Vulnerable 28 Allegheny Onion; 29 (7)(10) Allium cuthbertii keeverae Threatened Special Concern, Vulnerable 30 Striped Garlic; Keever’s Onion; 31 (8)(11) Alnus viridis ssp. crispa Special Concern, Vulnerable 32 Green Alder; 33 (9)(12) Amaranthus pumilus** Threatened 34 Seabeach Amaranth; 35 (10)(13) Amorpha confusa Threatened 36 Savanna Indigo-bush; 37 (11)(14) Amorpha georgiana Endangered 1 1 1 Georgia Indigo-bush; 2 (12)(15) Amphicarpum muhlenbergianum Endangered 3 Florida Goober Grass, Blue Maidencane; 4 (13) Andropogon mohrii Threatened 5 Bog Bluestem; 6 (14)(16) Anemone berlandieri Endangered 7 Southern Anemone; 8 (15)(17) Anemone caroliniana Endangered 9 Prairie Anemone; 10 (16)(18) Arabis pycnocarpa var.
    [Show full text]
  • Fern Classification
    16 Fern classification ALAN R. SMITH, KATHLEEN M. PRYER, ERIC SCHUETTPELZ, PETRA KORALL, HARALD SCHNEIDER, AND PAUL G. WOLF 16.1 Introduction and historical summary / Over the past 70 years, many fern classifications, nearly all based on morphology, most explicitly or implicitly phylogenetic, have been proposed. The most complete and commonly used classifications, some intended primar• ily as herbarium (filing) schemes, are summarized in Table 16.1, and include: Christensen (1938), Copeland (1947), Holttum (1947, 1949), Nayar (1970), Bierhorst (1971), Crabbe et al. (1975), Pichi Sermolli (1977), Ching (1978), Tryon and Tryon (1982), Kramer (in Kubitzki, 1990), Hennipman (1996), and Stevenson and Loconte (1996). Other classifications or trees implying relationships, some with a regional focus, include Bower (1926), Ching (1940), Dickason (1946), Wagner (1969), Tagawa and Iwatsuki (1972), Holttum (1973), and Mickel (1974). Tryon (1952) and Pichi Sermolli (1973) reviewed and reproduced many of these and still earlier classifica• tions, and Pichi Sermolli (1970, 1981, 1982, 1986) also summarized information on family names of ferns. Smith (1996) provided a summary and discussion of recent classifications. With the advent of cladistic methods and molecular sequencing techniques, there has been an increased interest in classifications reflecting evolutionary relationships. Phylogenetic studies robustly support a basal dichotomy within vascular plants, separating the lycophytes (less than 1 % of extant vascular plants) from the euphyllophytes (Figure 16.l; Raubeson and Jansen, 1992, Kenrick and Crane, 1997; Pryer et al., 2001a, 2004a, 2004b; Qiu et al., 2006). Living euphyl• lophytes, in turn, comprise two major clades: spermatophytes (seed plants), which are in excess of 260 000 species (Thorne, 2002; Scotland and Wortley, Biology and Evolution of Ferns and Lycopliytes, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Register
    NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER VOLUME 35 ● ISSUE 07 ● Pages 702 – 821 October 1, 2020 I. EXECUTIVE ORDERS Executive Order No. 160-163 ......................................................................... 702 – 734 II. IN ADDITION Health and Human Services, Department of – Notice of Application ............ 735 III. PROPOSED RULES Agriculture and Consumer Services, Department of Plant Conservation Board ............................................................................... 736 – 754 Public Safety, Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission ...................................................... 754 – 755 Environmental Quality, Department of Environmental Management Commission ...................................................... 755 – 758 Marine Fisheries Commission ........................................................................ 758 – 779 Wildlife Resources Commission ..................................................................... 779 – 782 Public Instruction, Department of Education, State Board of ............................................................................... 782 – 783 Secretary of State, Department of Department...................................................................................................... 783 – 784 Occupational Licensing Boards and Commissions Landscape Contractors' Licensing Board ........................................................ 784 – 785 IV. APPROVED RULES........................................................................................ 786 – 813
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Fern, Thelypteris Kunthii: Perennial for Full- to Part-Shade and Moist Soil
    NICE-Natives Improve and Conserve Environments Spring 2020 Plant of the Season Wood Fern, Thelypteris kunthii: Perennial for full- to part-shade and moist soil Description: Wood Fern, Thelypteris kunthii, also called Southern Shield Fern and Kunth’s Maiden Fern, is a deciduous fern that grows 1-3 feet tall and 1-3 feet wide. Very occasionally, specimens may reach 5 ft in height and diameter. In nature, Wood Fern is found in woodlands, wetlands, stream banks and near seeps in Texas and the southeastern US. T. kunthii is named in honor of Carl Sigismund Kunth, a German botanist who studied American plants in the early 1800s. Wood Fern’s fronds are light- to medium-green and will take on bronze Photos courtesy of Alan Cressler (left) and Sonnia color in the late fall and go brown as they Hill (right) die back in winter. Flowers and Seeds: Not applicable. Ferns reproduce using spores that form under their leaves. They do not flower or set seed. Planting sites: Wood Fern thrives in part shade to full shade in moist sandy, loam, clay or limestone- containing soils. It will tolerate poor drainage, as long as the soil is not compacted. Wood Fern requires moist soil and is not appropriate for soils that will completely dry out, although it can survive brief dry spells. Wood Fern flourishes in average to rich soil and will appreciate organic soil amendments. Watering Instructions: Wood Fern’s water requirements vary with the amount of sun it receives: the more sun it receives, the more water it will need.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Flora Checklist a Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium
    Washington Flora Checklist A checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium The Washington Flora Checklist aims to be a complete list of the native and naturalized vascular plants of Washington State, with current classifications, nomenclature and synonymy. The checklist currently contains 3,929 terminal taxa (species, subspecies, and varieties). Taxa included in the checklist: * Native taxa whether extant, extirpated, or extinct. * Exotic taxa that are naturalized, escaped from cultivation, or persisting wild. * Waifs (e.g., ballast plants, escaped crop plants) and other scarcely collected exotics. * Interspecific hybrids that are frequent or self-maintaining. * Some unnamed taxa in the process of being described. Family classifications follow APG IV for angiosperms, PPG I (J. Syst. Evol. 54:563?603. 2016.) for pteridophytes, and Christenhusz et al. (Phytotaxa 19:55?70. 2011.) for gymnosperms, with a few exceptions. Nomenclature and synonymy at the rank of genus and below follows the 2nd Edition of the Flora of the Pacific Northwest except where superceded by new information. Accepted names are indicated with blue font; synonyms with black font. Native species and infraspecies are marked with boldface font. Please note: This is a working checklist, continuously updated. Use it at your discretion. Created from the Washington Flora Checklist Database on September 17th, 2018 at 9:47pm PST. Available online at http://biology.burke.washington.edu/waflora/checklist.php Comments and questions should be addressed to the checklist administrators: David Giblin ([email protected]) Peter Zika ([email protected]) Suggested citation: Weinmann, F., P.F. Zika, D.E. Giblin, B.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised Family-Level Classification for Eupolypod II Ferns (Polypodiidae: Polypodiales)
    TAXON 61 (3) • June 2012: 515–533 Rothfels & al. • Eupolypod II classification A revised family-level classification for eupolypod II ferns (Polypodiidae: Polypodiales) Carl J. Rothfels,1 Michael A. Sundue,2 Li-Yaung Kuo,3 Anders Larsson,4 Masahiro Kato,5 Eric Schuettpelz6 & Kathleen M. Pryer1 1 Department of Biology, Duke University, Box 90338, Durham, North Carolina 27708, U.S.A. 2 The Pringle Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology, University of Vermont, 27 Colchester Ave., Burlington, Vermont 05405, U.S.A. 3 Institute of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan 4 Systematic Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyv. 18D, 752 36, Uppsala, Sweden 5 Department of Botany, National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba 305-0005, Japan 6 Department of Biology and Marine Biology, University of North Carolina Wilmington, 601 South College Road, Wilmington, North Carolina 28403, U.S.A. Carl J. Rothfels and Michael A. Sundue contributed equally to this work. Author for correspondence: Carl J. Rothfels, [email protected] Abstract We present a family-level classification for the eupolypod II clade of leptosporangiate ferns, one of the two major lineages within the Eupolypods, and one of the few parts of the fern tree of life where family-level relationships were not well understood at the time of publication of the 2006 fern classification by Smith & al. Comprising over 2500 species, the composition and particularly the relationships among the major clades of this group have historically been contentious and defied phylogenetic resolution until very recently. Our classification reflects the most current available data, largely derived from published molecular phylogenetic studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of New Zealand Ferns and Lycophytes
    FLORA OF NEW ZEALAND FERNS AND LYCOPHYTES THELYPTERIDACEAE P.J. BROWNSEY & L.R. PERRIE Fascicle 16 – AUGUST 2016 © Landcare Research New Zealand Limited 2016. Unless indicated otherwise for specific items, this copyright work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license Attribution if redistributing to the public without adaptation: “Source: Landcare Research” Attribution if making an adaptation or derivative work: “Sourced from Landcare Research” See Image Information for copyright and licence details for images. CATALOGUING IN PUBLICATION Brownsey, P.J. (Patrick John), 1948- Flora of New Zealand [electronic resource] : ferns and lycophytes. Fascicle 16, Thelypteridaceae / P.J. Brownsey and L.R. Perrie. -- Lincoln, N.Z. : Manaaki Whenua Press, 2016. 1 online resource ISBN 978-0-478-34786-9 (pdf) ISBN 978-0-478-34761-6 (set) 1.Ferns -- New Zealand - Identification. I. Perrie, L.R. (Leon Richard). II. Title. III. Manaaki Whenua- Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd. UDC 582.394.742(931) DC 587.30993 DOI: 10.7931/B1G59H This work should be cited as: Brownsey, P.J. & Perrie, L.R. 2016: Thelypteridaceae. In: Breitwieser, I.; Wilton, A.D. Flora of New Zealand - Ferns and Lycophytes. Fascicle 16. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln. http://dx.doi.org/10.7931/B1G59H Cover image: Pneumatopteris pennigera. Frond of mature plant. Contents Introduction..............................................................................................................................................1 Taxa Thelypteridaceae Pic.Serm.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Washington Baltimore Area
    Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plants of the Washington - Baltimore Area Part I Ferns, Fern Allies, Gymnosperms, and Dicotyledons by Stanwyn G. Shetler and Sylvia Stone Orli Department of Botany National Museum of Natural History 2000 Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560-0166 ii iii PREFACE The better part of a century has elapsed since A. S. Hitchcock and Paul C. Standley published their succinct manual in 1919 for the identification of the vascular flora in the Washington, DC, area. A comparable new manual has long been needed. As with their work, such a manual should be produced through a collaborative effort of the region’s botanists and other experts. The Annotated Checklist is offered as a first step, in the hope that it will spark and facilitate that effort. In preparing this checklist, Shetler has been responsible for the taxonomy and nomenclature and Orli for the database. We have chosen to distribute the first part in preliminary form, so that it can be used, criticized, and revised while it is current and the second part (Monocotyledons) is still in progress. Additions, corrections, and comments are welcome. We hope that our checklist will stimulate a new wave of fieldwork to check on the current status of the local flora relative to what is reported here. When Part II is finished, the two parts will be combined into a single publication. We also maintain a Web site for the Flora of the Washington-Baltimore Area, and the database can be searched there (http://www.nmnh.si.edu/botany/projects/dcflora).
    [Show full text]