The State of Business in Mount Dennis: Disinvestment and Gentrification in Toronto’S Inner-Suburbs Katharine N

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The State of Business in Mount Dennis: Disinvestment and Gentrification in Toronto’S Inner-Suburbs Katharine N The State of Business in Mount Dennis: Disinvestment and Gentrification in Toronto’s Inner-Suburbs Katharine N. Rankin, Kuni Kamizaki, and Heather McLean Research Paper 226 Cities Centre, University of Toronto November, 2013 ISSN 0316-0068; ISBN-13 978-0-7727-1485-5 Cities Centre • University of Toronto ii The State of Business in Mount Dennis: Disinvestment and Gentrification in Toronto’s Inner- Suburbs The State of Business in Mount Dennis Disinvestment and Gentrification in Toronto’s Inner-Suburbs Katharine N. Rankin, Kuni Kamizaki, Heather McLean Research Paper 226 November 2013, vii, 70 pp. ISSN 0316-0068 ISBN-13 978-0-7727-1485-5 Cities Centre West End Local Economic Development University of Toronto c/o Action for Neighbourhood Change 455 Spadina Avenue, 4th floor - Mount Dennis Toronto M5S 2G8 Canada 1366B Weston Road Telephone: 416-978-2072 Toronto M4M 4R8 Canada Fax 416-978-7162 Telephone: 416-242-7031 E-mail: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.citiescentre.utoronto.ca Website: http://www.weled.ca The opinions expressed in this or any paper published by Cities Centre (formerly the Centre for Urban and Community Studies) do not necessarily reflect the views of the Centre, or those of the University of Toronto. Cities Centre • University of Toronto The State of Business in Mount Dennis: iii Disinvestment and Gentrification in Toronto’s Inner- Suburbs Acknowledgement This research was carried out as part of a research project on “Commercial gentrification, diverse economies and the politics of social mix in Toronto,” funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (grant no. 107754). It was conducted by a team of researchers in the Department of Geography and Program in Planning at the University of Toronto in collaboration with community-based researchers affiliated with the Action for Neighbourhood Change (ANC) office in Mount Dennis. The research forms a partnership with the SSHRC-funded Anti-Poverty Community Organizing and Learning (APCOL) research project at the Ontario Institute of Studies in Education (OISE), University of Toronto. We are grateful to the following partners for their participation: Action for Neighbourhood Change Ayana Francis Cutty Duncan Michael Miller Sara Abdo Fatma Yasin Natalia Khabarova York Youth Coalition University of Toronto, Geography/Planning Shadya Yasin Research Assistants Omar Francis Nehal El-Hadi Melissa Fong Social Planning Toronto David Seitz Winston Tinglin Prasad Khanolkar APCOL, University of Toronto Community Researchers Peter Sawchuk Kurt Strachan Erin Oldynski Sojica John Julie Chamberlain Dr. Gail Matthews Thomas Saczkowski Shane McLeod Youssef Sawan Our thanks also go to Professor Robert Lewis and Nick Lombardo, Department of Geography at the University of Toronto, for advice on the collection and analysis of quantitative data from archival sources; Dr. Greg Spencer from the Munk School of Global Affairs at the University of Toronto, with whom we consulted on statistical analysis and who furnished access to data on small businesses; staff at Toronto City Archives who provided guidance on identifying archival documents related to commercial structure and property ownership; and Matt Armstrong who assisted in land use policy analysis. We also value the contributions of business owners and key informants in Mount Dennis, who kindly participated in interviews and surveys. The original version of this report is available at the West End Local Economic Development (WELED) website (http://www.weled.ca/). Thanks go to Professor Alan Walks and anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the report; to Michael Miller, Prasad Khanolkar and Tamam A. Jama for photography; and to Fatma Yasin for graphic design. Cities Centre • University of Toronto iv The State of Business in Mount Dennis: Disinvestment and Gentrification in Toronto’s Inner- Suburbs Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Objectives .......................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Organization of the Report ................................................................................................................. 8 2 RESEARCH DESIGN ............................................................................................... 10 2.1 Site Selection ................................................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Research Methods ........................................................................................................................... 11 3 MOUNT DENNIS IN RELATION TO THE CITY AND THE WORLD ......................... 15 3.1 Contemporary Neighbourhood Characteristics ................................................................................ 15 3.1.1 Prevalence of Poverty ................................................................................................................... 16 3.1.2 Prevalence of New Immigrants and Racialized Minorities ............................................................ 17 3.1.3 Dual Presence of Crime and Police .............................................................................................. 18 3.2 Manufacturing History ...................................................................................................................... 19 3.3 Structural Changes in Retail ............................................................................................................ 20 3.4 State Presence ................................................................................................................................ 21 4 SUBURBAN VISIONS AND REDEVELOPMENT PLANNING ................................ 22 4.1 Real Estate Development Vision ..................................................................................................... 24 4.2 Green/Cultural Economy Vision ....................................................................................................... 26 4.3 Some Common Ground ................................................................................................................... 27 5 MOUNT DENNIS COMMERCIAL STRIP: STRUCTURAL CHALLENGES, ASSETS AND VULNERABILITIES .............................................................................................. 31 5.1 Structural Challenges ...................................................................................................................... 32 5.2 Assets and Vitalities ......................................................................................................................... 38 5.3 Vulnerabilities to Displacement ........................................................................................................ 42 6 CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................... 47 7 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 53 8 APPENDIX 1: INTERVIEW SCHEDULE ................................................................. 57 9 APPENDIX 2: SMALL BUSINESS SURVEY ........................................................... 60 10 APPENDIX 3: BUSINESS CODES ........................................................................ 62 11 APPENDIX 4: SITE AND AREA SPECIFIC POLICIES APPLICABLE TO THE AREA SOUTH OF EGLINTON ...................................................................................... 64 12 APPENDIX 5: ABOUT WEST-END LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (WE- LED) ............................................................................................................................... 66 Cities Centre • University of Toronto The State of Business in Mount Dennis: v Disinvestment and Gentrification in Toronto’s Inner- Suburbs List of Figures FIGURE 1: A MAP OF THREE CITIES IN TORONTO (HULCHANSKI 2010) ........................................... 11 FIGURE 2: BUSINESS INTERVIEW SAMPLE BY SECTOR ................................................................... 12 FIGURE 3: MOUNT DENNIS NEIGHBOURHOOD BOUNDARY FOR STUDY ............................................ 13 FIGURE 4: AVERAGE INDIVIDUAL INCOME ....................................................................................... 16 FIGURE 5: MOUNT DENNIS RESIDENTS IN MANUFACTURING JOBS .................................................. 16 FIGURE 6: VISIBLE MINORITIES IN MOUNT DENNIS ......................................................................... 18 FIGURE 7: THE TWO MOST CARDED AREAS IN 2010 (TORONTO STAR 2012) .................................. 19 FIGURE 8: WESTON-MOUNT DENNIS REVITALIZATION INITIATIVES (CITY OF TORONTO 2011A) ........ 23 FIGURE 9: CITY OF TORONTO OFFICIAL PLAN ZONING DESIGNATIONS FOR THE MOUNT DENNIS AREA .................................................................................................................................................... 24 FIGURE 10: MOUNT DENNIS COMMERCIAL STRIP AND THE STUDY AREA ........................................ 31 FIGURE 11: OWNERSHIP CHARACTERISTICS .................................................................................. 33 FIGURE 12: OWNERS' ETHNO-RACIAL BACKGROUND ..................................................................... 33 FIGURE 13: YEARS IN OPERATION ................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average Price by Percentage Increase: January to June 2016
    City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average price by percentage increase: January to June 2016 C06 – $1,282,135 C14 – $2,018,060 1,624,017 C15 698,807 $1,649,510 972,204 869,656 754,043 630,542 672,659 1,968,769 1,821,777 781,811 816,344 3,412,579 763,874 $691,205 668,229 1,758,205 $1,698,897 812,608 *C02 $2,122,558 1,229,047 $890,879 1,149,451 1,408,198 *C01 1,085,243 1,262,133 1,116,339 $1,423,843 E06 788,941 803,251 Less than 10% 10% - 19.9% 20% & Above * 1,716,792 * 2,869,584 * 1,775,091 *W01 13.0% *C01 17.9% E01 12.9% W02 13.1% *C02 15.2% E02 20.0% W03 18.7% C03 13.6% E03 15.2% W04 19.9% C04 13.8% E04 13.5% W05 18.3% C06 26.9% E05 18.7% W06 11.1% C07 29.2% E06 8.9% W07 18.0% *C08 29.2% E07 10.4% W08 10.9% *C09 11.4% E08 7.7% W09 6.1% *C10 25.9% E09 16.2% W10 18.2% *C11 7.9% E10 20.1% C12 18.2% E11 12.4% C13 36.4% C14 26.4% C15 31.8% Compared to January to June 2015 Source: RE/MAX Hallmark, Toronto Real Estate Board Market Watch *Districts that recorded less than 100 sales were discounted to prevent the reporting of statistical anomalies R City of Toronto — Neighbourhoods by TREB District WEST W01 High Park, South Parkdale, Swansea, Roncesvalles Village W02 Bloor West Village, Baby Point, The Junction, High Park North W05 W03 Keelesdale, Eglinton West, Rockcliffe-Smythe, Weston-Pellam Park, Corso Italia W10 W04 York, Glen Park, Amesbury (Brookhaven), Pelmo Park – Humberlea, Weston, Fairbank (Briar Hill-Belgravia), Maple Leaf, Mount Dennis W05 Downsview, Humber Summit, Humbermede (Emery), Jane and Finch W09 W04 (Black Creek/Glenfield-Jane
    [Show full text]
  • CROSSTOWN LRT 2 3 4 5 6 Construction of the Eglinton Crosstown LRT Line
    CROSSTOWN LRT 2 3 4 5 6 Construction of the Eglinton Crosstown LRT Line Background • In September 2008, Metrolinx launched a regional transportation plan – a 25-year, $50 billion plan -- to coordinate and integrate transportation and transit in the Greater Toronto Area • In 2010, City of Toronto approved the project to build the Eglinton Crosstown from Weston Road in the west to Kennedy Station in the east. • Following a competitive process, Crosslinx Transit Solutions (CTS) was awarded a contract in July 2015 to design, build, finance, and maintain the Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit (LRT). Project Players and Roles What Are We Building – a New Modern LRT • 15 underground stations and 10 surface stops – 9 km below ground and 10 km above ground • A maintenance and storage facility • A 19-kilometre route separated from regular traffic • Transit communications system • Links to 54 bus routes, three subway stations, GO Transit, and a new UP Express station Awaiting Safety First – Our #1 Priority feedback from Safety We train and direct staff to: • Always have a site specific safety plan and site specific emergency plan. • Ensure pre-work hazard assessments are complete and understood. • Ensure job hazards analyses are complete and understood. • Do everything possible to protect themselves, co-workers, and members of the public. • Stop work if the safety of themselves, co-workers and members of the public cannot be assured. • Identify and report unsafe behaviour and coach each other to make improvements. • Be prepared and equipped to work safely. Crosstown Design Approach Street Level – Contextual and An International Signature for Entrance – Bright & Secure Inviting Toronto Concourse – Simple & Pristine Concourse – Transparent & Open Platform – Spacious & Animated CTSD Ask designers what key features are Accessibility Ask for existing examples of other projects Station and Stops are designed to be universally accessible, including satisfaction of the Need better visuals AODA, applicable City of Toronto Guidelines, the OBC, and CSA Standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Benefits Quarterly
    EGLINTON CROSSTOWN Community Benefits and Liaison Plan Summary & Progress To-Date 6 201 DECEMBER Photo: Crosslinx Transit Solutions, 2016. Transit Crosslinx Photo: Photo: Crosslinx Transit Solutions, 2016. I. INTRODUCTION Metrolinx and Infrastructure Ontario selected Crosslinx Transit Solutions to design, build, finance and maintain the Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit (ECLRT) project, the first major transit expansion in 50 years. The provincial government’s $5.3 billion Crosstown investment is the single largest GTA transit investment ever. When it’s up and running, the Crosstown will deliver service that is reliable, comfortable and 60 percent faster than what is now available. What’s more, building the line is creating thousands of jobs, 2,500 at peak construction, and other significant economic benefits. The Crosstown is also unique because it is Ontario’s first large- scale public infrastructure project to contractually require the developer, CTS, to ensure that local communities and historically disadvantaged and equity seeking groups directly benefit from the province’s investment. Historically disadvantaged and equity seeking groups (H&E) refer to groups that have been historically excluded or marginalized from the processes and decisions that affect them. To meet this requirement, CTS is providing a range of employment, training and apprenticeship opportunities to these groups, as well as purchasing goods and services from local suppliers and social enterprises, whenever possible. 1 Photo: Crosslinx Transit Solutions, 2016. II. PROJECT AGREEMENT REQUIREMENTS Eglinton Crosstown Project Agreement Requirements The objective of the Community Benefits and Liaison Plan Community Benefits is to maximize training, employment and procurement The Project Agreement mandates a plan that includes: opportunities for Eglinton-area residents and businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Systems & Track: What to Expect
    IT’S HAPPENING, TODAY Forum Eglinton Crosstown LRT Metrolinx’s Core Business – Providing Better, Faster, Easier Service We have a strong connection with our Adding More Service Today Making It Easier for Our customers, and a Customers to Access Our great understanding Service of who they are and Building More to Improve Service where they are going. Planning for New Connections Investing in Our Future MISSION: VISION: WE CONNECT GETTING YOU THERE COMMUNITIES BETTER, FASTER, EASIER 3 WELCOME Our Central East Open House will feature the following stations and stops: • Eglinton • Mt Pleasant • Leaside • Laird • Sunnybrook Park • Science Centre Read more about how Eglinton Crosstown will change Toronto’s cityscape here. Train Testing Video: Click Here Eglinton Crosstown PROJECT UPDATE • The Eglinton Crosstown project is now 70% complete • By the end of 2020, three stations – Mount Dennis, Keelesdale and Science Centre – will be largely complete • 69% of track has been installed • Vehicle testing is now underway Eglinton Crosstown What to Expect: Systems & Track 2020 Progress to-date Remaining Work in 2020 Remaining Work for 2021 • Track installed between Mount Dennis Station • Track installation between Wynford Stop to • Track installation between Fairbank Station to and Fairbank Station Sloane Stop track split and from Birchmount Laird Station, and Kennedy Station tail tracks • Track installed between East Portal Stop to Kennedy Station (excluding tail tracks) • Traction power cables installation from (Brentcliffe Rd) and Wynford Stop and
    [Show full text]
  • Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Initial Business Case February 2020
    Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Initial Business Case February 2020 Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Initial Business Case February 2020 Contents Executive Summary 1 Scope 1 Method of Analysis 1 Findings 3 Strategic Case 3 Economic Case 3 Financial Case 4 Deliverability and Operations Case 4 Summary 4 Introduction 7 Background 8 Business Case Overview 10 Problem Statement 13 Case for Change 14 Problem Statement 14 Opportunity for Change 15 Key Drivers 16 Strategic Value 18 iv Investment Options 24 Introduction 25 Study Area 25 Options Development 25 Options for Analysis 27 Assumptions for Analysis and Travel Demand Modelling 33 Strategic Case 34 Introduction 35 Strategic Objective 1 – Connect More Places with Better Frequent Rapid Transit 38 Criterion 1: To provide high quality transit to more people in more places 38 Criterion 2: To address the connectivity gap between Eglinton Crosstown LRT and Transitway BRT 40 Strategic Objective 2 – Improve Transit’s Convenience and Attractiveness 42 Criterion 2: To provide more reliable, safe and enjoyable travel experience 42 Criterion 2: To boost transit use and attractiveness among local residents and workers 45 Strategic Objective 3 – Promote Healthier and More Sustainable Travel Behaviours 52 Criterion 1: To improve liveability through reduction in traffic delays, auto dependency and air pollution 52 Criterion 2: To encourage use of active modes to access stations 53 v Strategic Objective 4 – Encourage Transit-Supportive Development 57 Criterion 1: Compatibility with Existing Neighbourhood
    [Show full text]
  • 8Brentcliffe Road
    BRENTCLIFFE ROAD 8 TORONTO (LEASIDE), ON PRIME LEASIDE LOCATION FOR SALE PRICE REDUCED ~3,000 SQ. FT. FREESTANDING OFFICE BUILDING CONTACT CBRE LIMITED 2005 Sheppard Avenue East Suite 800, Toronto CAROL TRATTNER** ON M2J 5B4 Senior Vice President T +1 416 495 6253 www.cbre.ca [email protected] **Broker BRENTCLIFFE ROAD 8 TORONTO (LEASIDE), ON • FOR SALE ~3,000 SQ. FT. BUILDING DETAILS FREESTANDING OFFICE BUILDING • Immaculate condition - well appointed office LOCATION Laird Drive & Eglinton Avenue East ZONING E 1.0 (new) / M2 (old) BUILDING 2,944 sq. ft. on two floors REALTY TAXES $27,499.33 (2019) LAND SIZE 0.11 ac. (40 ft. FR. X 123.77 ft. D.) SALE PRICE $2,500,000 $2,150,000 Immaculate condition! Prime Leaside Ample parking Abundant Amenities Excellent access to Well appointed offices location Beside future SmartCentres public transit - short walk Shopping Centre to future Crosstown LRT RioCan Development 1650 Residential Units 5 Towers EGLINTON AVE E Diamond Corp to Build 985 Residential Units in 3 towers LAIRD DR SmartCentre Future Development BRENTCLIFFE RD WICKSTEED AVE MINUTES TO DOWNTOWN / DVP Future Development All outlines contained in this doument are approximate. www.cbre.ca BRENTCLIFFE ROAD 8 TORONTO (LEASIDE), ON • FOR SALE ~3,000 SQ. FT. BUILDING DETAILS FREESTANDING OFFICE BUILDING 1st Floor 2nd2nd Floor Floor Transit & Amenities Map TRANSIT LEGEND 8 Brentcliffe Road 88 - South Leaside West to St. Clair Station East to Beth Nealson Dr./Thorncliffe Park Dr. 56 - Leaside West to Eglinton Station South to Donlands Station Eglinton Crosstown LRT West to Mount Dennis East to Kennedy 8 Proposed Crosstown Stations 5 7 5 9 12 4 10 11 10 12 14 13 9 11 AREA AMENITIES 4 8 Cafe/Restaurant 7 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kodak Lands Today the Kodak Lands Are a Large Parcel of Land East of the Rail Corridor Between Eglinton Avenue, Industry Street 4 and Black Creek Drive
    Industry Street The Kodak Coronation 3.1 Lands Ray Avenue Park The Kodak Lands Today The Kodak Lands are a large parcel of land east of the rail corridor between Eglinton Avenue, Industry Street 4 and Black Creek Drive. It is the former site of a large Keelesdale Drive Kodak plant which occupied the area from 1913 to 3 2005. The site has since been cleared and all that remains is Kodak Building No.9, the former employee building for the plant. Kodak Building No.9 sits on an elevated piece of land overlooking the city and will be Black Creek Drive preserved by Metrolinx. Kodak Building While the site is substantial in scale, it is currently No 9 1 isolated from the residential and retail community 2 by the rail corridor to its west and a significant grade Eglinton Avenue change to the south along Eglinton Avenue. The eastern side of the site, alongside Black Creek Drive and either side of Keelesdale Drive, is lower then the Photography Drive rest of the property and located within the Black Creek valley lands. Weston Road 22 Mount Dennis Mobility Hub Study 1 2 The large retaining wall along the north side of Eglinton Avenue illustrates the difference in grade between the site and its surroundings The Kodak Building No. 9 is the sole remaining structure on the site and in a state of disrepair 3 4 The lands along Keelesdale Valley Drive are wooded and located within the valley View overlooking the site from the Kodak Building Chapter 3 Key Directions 23 The Kodak Lands Tomorrow Major Themes From Public Consultation What Changes Will Occur? What Do We Want to Achieve? Over the course of the Mobility Hub Study there were a Given the large scale of the Kodak Lands and its existing Mount Dennis Station and the Kodak Lands will be an range of ideas shared with the team regarding the future employment lands designation, the site was selected to important multi-modal transit hub supporting seamless of the Kodak Lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Dennis Sub-Region Who Are We?
    West Toronto Mount Dennis Sub-Region Who Are We? 12.0% Population Profile 10.0% Lone Parent Seniors Living Total Population: 13,150 Families Alone 8.0% Male: 47.2% Female: 52.7% 47.1% 26.0% 6.0% Mount Dennis % of Population 4.0% Lowest 17.5% 22.9% 2.0% Neighbourhood 0.0% Highest 47.1% 48.9% 85+ Neighbourhood 0 to 4 0 to 9 5 to 10 to 10 14 to 15 19 to 20 24 to 25 29 to 30 34 to 35 39 to 40 44 to 45 49 to 50 54 to 55 59 to 60 64 to 65 69 to 70 74 to 75 79 to 80 84 Mount Dennis West Sub-region Mount Dennis is bounded by Edmund Ave. to the North, CNR/CPR to the East, Lambton Income and Education Ave. and Eglinton Ave. W to the South and Humber River to the Low Income % West. LEGEND 20% 28% Toronto Central LHIN 5.8% 34.1% Mount Dennis Higher Education % Lowest Highest Neighbourhood Neighbourhood Prevalence Neighbourhood Toronto Central 50.1% 74.1% Health Status Rate (%) Ranges (%) LHIN Rate (%) 48.3% 88.8% Diabetes (Ages 20+) 13.1 5.4 – 13.1 8.4 Culture and Diversity Asthma (Ages 20+) 14.9 11.0 – 16.9 12.7 No Knowledge of English/French % Top Three Languages High Blood Pressure 23.6 16.4 – 23.6 18.3 Spoken at Home Other (Ages 20+) 4.2% 4.6% than English: Mental Health & 0.4% 7.0% Spanish Substance Use Visits 9.7 8.7 – 10.9 9.4 (Ages 20+) Recent Immigrants % Portuguese COPD (Ages 35+) 10.1 6.2 – 13.7 8.6 Vietnamese 16.2% 17.6% 6.5% 32.1% For more information about the neighbourhoods and sub-regions, including data sources, please visit www.torontocentrallhin.on.ca/forhsps/subregions West Toronto Mount Dennis Sub-Region How Do We Use Our Health System? High Urgency ED Visit Rates (All Ages): One out of every 4 people Mount Dennis residents have Mount Dennis 260.7 388.1 slightly higher percentage of (Age 19+) in Mount Dennis residents have the 188.5 388.1 Alternative Level of Care (ALC) have low continuity of highest rates of high Primary Care days for all ages and seniors High Urgency ED Visit Rates (Ages 20-44): compared to Toronto Central LHIN.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Health Assessment Report Identifying Assets, Needs and Service Priorities for Accesspoint on Jane
    Community Health Assessment Report Identifying Assets, Needs and Service Priorities for AccessPoint on Jane October 2013 Jane Community Health Assessment Report 2 Published by Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services, 2013 To be cited as: Access Alliance (2013). Jane Community Health Assessment Report. Toronto: Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services. Requests for permission and copies of this report should be addressed to: Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services 500-340 College Street Toronto, ON M5S 3G3 Telephone: (416) 324-8677 Fax: (416) 324-9074 www.accessalliance.ca © 2013 Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services Jane Community Health Assessment Report 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary ................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 2. Environmental Scan Findings ......................................................................................................................... 11 3. Community Survey Results ............................................................................................................................. 14 4. Community and Service Provider Focus Groups ............................................................................................ 19 5.
    [Show full text]
  • ASCENDING: MOUNT DENNIS Actions for the Evolution of a Connected Community PREPARED AS PART of the URBAN LAND INSTITUTE CURTNER LEADERSHIP PROGRAM, 2018-2019
    ASCENDING: MOUNT DENNIS Actions for the Evolution of a Connected Community PREPARED AS PART OF THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE CURTNER LEADERSHIP PROGRAM, 2018-2019 REPORT PREPARED BY: Amanda Mock, WSP Cynthia Shahani, DREAM Daniele Vezzoli, Zeidler Harim Labuschagne, Quadrangle Michelle German, Evergreen Stephanie Rosales, QuadReal Tony De Franco, Urban Strategies May 2019 Table of Contents 1. MOUNT DENNIS AT A CROSSROADS 2. ABOUT THE NEIGHBOURHOOD 3. TOWARDS AN ACTION PLAN 4. LOOKING FORWARD 5. HOW TO GET THERE APPENDIX FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS 1. Mount Dennis at a Crossroads Mount Dennis is at an important crossroads. A number of key questions were considered as part A significant investment in transit of the preparation of this Action Plan, including the infrastructure offers a unique opportunity for following: the neighbourhood to undergo an economic development renaissance. ■ How can we ensure that Mount Dennis is a welcoming, safe and affordable place for its residents at a time of great change? The completion of the Eglinton Crosstown LRT in 2021 and the establishment of the Mount Dennis Mobility ■ What might the Mount Dennis neighbourhood look Hub station on the former Kodak property offers an and feel like as it changes in response to the transit opportunity to rethink how the neighbourhood will evolve investments that are underway? in the coming years. Mount Dennis has the potential ■ How can we ensure that redevelopment leverages to transform into a highly connected and sustainable and builds upon existing community resources and community, one which becomes an even more attractive assets? and welcoming place for residents, workers, businesses ■ What are the priority initiatives and key strategic and visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Meadoway Multi-Use Trail Municipal Class Environmental Assessment – Schedule C Environmental Study Report
    The Meadoway Multi-Use Trail Municipal Class Environmental Assessment – Schedule C Environmental Study Report Prepared by: Toronto and Region Conservation Authority in partnership with the City of Toronto December 12, 2019 This page is intentionally left blank THE MEADOWAY MULTI-USE TRAIL MUNICIPAL CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT – SCHEDULE C Environmental Study Report Prepared by: Toronto and Region Conservation Authority in partnership with the City of Toronto (co-proponent) December 12, 2019 101 Exchange Avenue Vaughan ON L4K 5R6 Disclaimer: The data used to create maps in this report were compiled from a variety sources and dates. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) takes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the data and retains the right to make changes and corrections at any time without notice. For further information about the data on maps in this report, please contact the TRCA Information GIS Department 416.661.6600. Data provided by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry is copyright, Queen’s Printer for Ontario. Other data provided or used is copyright by their respective owners. This page is intentionally left blank Acknowledgements Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and City of Toronto gratefully acknowledge the efforts and contributions of the following people participating in the planning and design phases of The Meadoway Multi-use Trail Class Environmental Assessment: Celene Mariano Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Corey Wells Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
    [Show full text]
  • Every Tree Counts. a Portrait of Toronto's Urban Forest
    Every Tree Counts A Portrait of Toronto’s Urban Forest Parks, Forestry & Recreation Urban Forestry Parks, Forestry & Recreation Urban Forestry Every Tree Counts A Portrait of Toronto’s Urban Forest Foreword For decades, people flying into Toronto have observed that it is a very green city. Indeed, the sight of Toronto’s tree canopy from the air is impressive. More than 20 years ago, an urban forestry colleague noted that the trees in our parks should, and in many cases do, spill over into the streets like extensions of the City’s parks. Across Toronto and the entire Greater Toronto Area, the urban forest plays a significant role in converting subdivisions into neighbourhoods. Most people have an emotional connection to trees. In cities, they represent one of our remaining links to the natural world. Properly managed urban forests provide multiple services to city residents. Cleaner air and water, cooler temperatures, energy savings and higher property values are among the many benefits. With regular man- agement, these benefits increase every year as trees continue to grow. In 2007,Toronto City Council adopted a plan to significantly expand the City’s forest cover to between 30-40%. Parks, Forestry and Recreation responded with a Forestry Service Plan aimed at managing our existing growing stock, protecting the forest and planting more trees. Strategic management requires a detailed understanding of the state of the City’s forest resource. The need for better information was a main reason to undertake this study and report on the state of Toronto’s tree canopy. Emerging technologies like the i-Tree Eco model and remote sensing techniques used in this forestry study provide managers with new tools and better information to plan and execute the expansion, protection and maintenance of Toronto’s urban forest.
    [Show full text]