Thumbnail Sketch Good Advantage
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
EDITORIAL BOARD Editor and Chair of the Editorial Board . ftNNrrnR YouNGER EditorialAssistant. .... DevrnH. THoMAS Assistant Editors: Bens.{ne A. W.rNrnns . for Acquisitions Section ErrzesrrH E. CRAMER . for Cataloging and Classification Section JeNn Tnnaownlr- for Collection Management and Development Section JEANNEM. Dnnwns...... .. forPreservationand Reformatting Section SYLvIAOMARTIN....... ...forserialsSection PnuopNcr W. Dalnyuprn Special Editor MARGARETARosoy..... BookReviewEditor Ex-Officio Members: ELatNp Yorlrz, Delegate of the Chair, Council of Regional Groups KensN Mult,rn, Executive Director, ALCTS Dern SwnusaN, Editor, ALCTS Newsletter Online Library Resources 6 Technical Seraices (ISSN 0024-2527) is published quarterly by the American LibraryAssociation,50 E. Huron St., Chicago, IL 60611. It is the official publication of the Association for Library Collections & Technical Sewices, a division of the American Library Association Subscription Price: to members of the Associationfor Library Collections & Techni- cal Jervrces,Services,uz$27 / DU50 per year, included in the membership dues; to nonmembers, $55 per year in U.S,Canada,andMexico,and$55peryearinotherforeigncountries.Singlecopies,$l5.Period- ical postagepaid at Chicago, IL, and at additional mailing offices POSTMASTER: Send address changestoLibraryResourcesd:TechnicalSeraices,50E.HuronSt.,Chicago,IL 6061l.Bzsi- ness Manager: Karen Muller, Executive Director, Association for Library Collections & Techni cal Services,a division ofthe American Library Association. Send manuscripts to the Editorial Office: lennifer Younger, Edltor, Library Resources 6 Technical Seroices,22I Theodore M. Hesburgh Library University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556-5629;(219) 631-7790; fax: (2IS) 63I-6772; e-mail: younger [email protected]. Adt:eftising: Bill Coffee, c/o Benson, Coffee & Asso- ciates, l4l1 Peterson Ave., Park Ridge, IL 60068; (847) 692-4695; fax: (847) 692-3877 ALA Production Sercices:Troy D. Linker, Christine S. Taylor; Tina V Bryson, Angela Hanshaw, Kevin Heubusch, and Tracy Malecki. Members: Address changes and inquiries should be sent to Mem- bership Department-Library Resources 6 Technical Sen;ices,50 E. Huron St., Chicago, IL 60611. Nonmember subscribers:Subscriptions, orders, changesof address,and inquiries should be senlloLibrary Resources6 Technical Sen:ices, S & S Computer Serwices,Inc.,434W. Downer, Aurora, IL 60506. Library Resources b Technical Seraices is indexed in Library Literature , Library 6 lnfonnation Science Abstracts, Current lndex to lournals in Education, Science Citati.on lndex, and lnforma- tion Science Abstracts Contents are listed in CALL (Current American-Library Literature). Its reviews are included in Book Reai.eu;Digest, Book Reaiew lndex. and Reuiew 6f Reaieus Instructions for authors appear on p. 62-63 ofthe fanuary 1999 issue and on the LRTS Web page at www.ala.org/alctVlrts. Copies ofbooks for review should be addressed to Margaret Rohdy, Book Review Edttor, Library Resources d.rTechnical Sercices,Yan Pelt-Dietrich Library Center, University of Penn- sylvaniaLibraries, 3420 Walnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104-6206 (e-mail: [email protected]). @ American Library Association 1999 All materials in this journal subject to copyright by the American Library Association may be photocopied for the noncommercial purpose ofscientific or educational advancement granted by Sections 107 and 108 ofthe Copyright Revision Act of 1976. For other reprinting, photocopying, or translating, address requests to the ALA Office of Rights and Permissions, 50 E. Huron St., Chicago,IL 606If. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Stan- dard for Information Sciences-Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39 48-1992. q Publication in Librarg Resources d: Technical Sentices does not imply official endorsement by the Association for Library Collections & Technical Services nor by ALA, and the assumption of editorial responsibility is not to be construed as endorsement of the opinions expressed by the editor or individual contriburors. /r91 BibliogrophicFomilies in the LibroryCotolog: A Quolitotive Anolysisond GroundedTheory GregoryH. Leozer ond RichordP. Smiroglio suggest which ahematioe maps are preferable. T ln his landmarkstudy. Lubetzky (1953) tion of works. Lubetzlgz wrote (1953, 54, outlined the primaryobjectives of the cat- emphasis added): alog. Although Lubetzky's first objective The second objective is designed to en- (like that of Panizzi, Cutter, and many hance the utility and effectiveness of the others before and since) remained that of catalog by requiring the cataloger also to facilitating the identification of specific relate the given work to the other works of bibliographic entities, the second objec- the author and the other editions of the tive was to facilitate the explicit recogni- work Thus the catalog will tell the inquirer Gneconv H. LEAZER([email protected]) is Assistant Professor, Department of Information Studies, University ofCalifornia, Los Angeles. Rrcneno P. SMIRAGLIAis Professor,Palmer School of Library and Information Science, Long Island University, Brookville, N.Y. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant no. IRT-9734191 and by the OCLC Online Computer Library Center's Library and Information Science Research Grant Program. Manuscript received March l, 1999; accepted for publication May 28, 1999. I92/ LRTS o 43(4) o Leazer and Smi,raslia not only whether or not a given work is in works. In prior studies, Smiraglia (1992) the library but also uhat other editi,ons or and Smiraglia and Leazer (1999) have translations of the toork the library has, demonstrated the utility of this definition and what other works of the attho\ so that and have explored the size and extent of he could select the edition mnst useful or families of related works. suitable for his purposes, or another edi- In the present paper we seek to exam- tion if the one wanted is not in the library. ine qualitatively some interesting exam- Forty-five years have passed since ples of families of related works (we will Lubetzlcywrote thosewords, yet still our de{ine these as bibliographic families be- catalogsare better designedto identify low). Our purpose in this analysis is to specific bibliographic entities than they steo back from the constrictions of the are to guide usersamong the network of empirical paradigm so as to see more potential relatededitions and translations clearly the complexity of the relationships of works. amonq works derived from a common set of ideitional and linguistic strings. BIBLIOGRAPHIc ENTITIES, ITEMS,AND WoRKs BIBLIoGRAPHIC RELATIoNSHIPS AND FAMILIES A bibliographic entity is a unique instance of recorded knowledge, e.g., a sculpture, A principle objective of the catalog has a textbook, etc. Each bibliographic entity been to associateworks on the basis of has both physical and intellectual proper- shared textual identity: in this paper we ties. The physical property-the item-is are interested primarily in expressing represented in the catalog by a tran- how one work misht be derived from an- scribed record of its inherent biblio- other. In this instance two works can be graphic characteristics(the item's dimen- modeled like a family tree, i.e., astwo ob- sions,its details of publication, etc.). The jects that share a relationship. Any work, intellectual properiy-the usork-.is the either a wholly new work or a work de- actual knowledge recorded. Although an rived from some other work, can serve as important objective of the catalog is to fa- a progenitor for additional works. Fur- cilitate the location of a soecific item in a thermore, multiple works can exist within librarv collection. authois from Panizzi multiple items. The set of such interre- (f848) to Wilson (1989a and 1989b) have lated works and items is called a biblio- asserted that the more crucial obiective graphic family, where the relationships for any bibliographic retrieval tool is to fa- among entities express shared semantic cilitate the location of a soeciffc' work. or or linguistic activity, or the material ex- group ofworkr. pression of such identity in an item. If ex- As in our previous research (Smiraglia plicitly included in the library catalog, andLeazer 1999), we define awork as the bibliographic relationships would assist intellectual content ofa bibliographic en- users in selecting the most suitable work tity. Any work has two properties: a) the for their own purposes. propositions expressed, which form Derivative relationships are the pri- ideational content; and b) the expression mary relationships that exist among the ofthose propositions (usually a particular members of a bibliographic family. More set of linguistic [musical, etc.] strings), precisely, derivative bibliographic rela- which forms linguistic content. This defi- tionships exist between any new concep- nition is derived from Wilson (1968. tion of a work and its original source (the 1989a and f989b) and Calpenter (f981). progenitor), or its successor,or both. For Every work is unique. Any change in instance, a work and its abridgment, vari- ideational or linguisiic content r"rrr'it, irt ous translations of the worl and their the creation of i new work. A maior ad- abridgments, separately issued excerpts, vantage to this definition is its veriatility a motion picture film version of the work, in operationalizing empirical research and a programmatic musical work based into