DOCSLIB.ORG

Power Line Trail

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Power Line Trail PROTECTING SIGNIFICA NT VIEWS ALONG THE CIRCUIT: A VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES FOR VIEWSHEDS ALONG THE CIRCUIT TRAILS POWER LINE TRAIL March 2019 PREPARED BY: APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN CLUB Catherine Poppenwimer Patricia McCloskey, AICP Dave Publicover PROTECTING SIGNIFICANT VIEWS ALONG THE CIRCUIT Contents Acknowledgments............................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 The Circuit ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Protecting Views Along The Circuit ................................................................................................................................ 2 Power Line Trail ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Study Area Landscape ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Results for the Power Line Trail ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Power Line Trail Viewshed........................................................................................................................................... 4 Study Area Key Observation Points ....................................................................................................................... 5 Parcel Value Assessment ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Power Line Trail Viewshed Resources ................................................................................................................... 6 Visual Resources ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Scenic Character ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Key Observation Points ........................................................................................................................................... 9 Ownership Fragmentation ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Combined Parcel Value .......................................................................................................................................... 10 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Appendix A: Key Assumptions and Known Data Limitations ................................................................................. 13 Appendix B: Methodology .............................................................................................................................................. 15 Study Area ..................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Approach ....................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Analysis Components .................................................................................................................................................. 16 Combined Parcel Value Score .................................................................................................................................... 21 Additional Information ............................................................................................................................................... 21 List of Tables Table 1: Study Area Municipalities ................................................................................................................................... 3 Table 2: Visual Assessment Summary ........................................................................................................................... 11 Appalachian Mountain Club, March 2019 2 PROTECTING SIGNIFICANT VIEWS ALONG THE CIRCUIT List of Maps Map 1: Study Area............................................................................................................................................................... 3 Map 2: Viewshed Area ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Map 3: KOP Location and Viewshed ............................................................................................................................ 5 Map 4: Visibility Resources ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Map 5: Scenic Resources .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Map 6: KOP Resources ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 Map 7: Combined Parcel Value ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Map 8: Highest Ranked Parcels ...................................................................................................................................... 12 Map 9: Circuit Trails Included in the Study .................................................................................................................. 15 List of Figures Figure 1: Visual Resources Score...................................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 2: Scenic Resources Score ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 3: Combined Parcel Value Score ........................................................................................................................ 10 Figure 4: Visibility Resources .......................................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 5: Scenic Character Resources ............................................................................................................................ 19 Figure 6: Key Observation Point Resources ................................................................................................................ 20 Figure 7: Ownership Resources ...................................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 8: Methodology Flow Chart ................................................................................................................................ 22 Appalachian Mountain Club, March 2019 PROTECTING SIGNIFICANT VIEWS ALONG THE CIRCUIT Acknowledgments The Appalachian Mountain Club (AMC) would like to acknowledge the many contributors who provided their time and input to the development of Protecting Significant Views Along The Circuit: An Assessment of Land Conservation Priorities for Viewsheds Along The Circuit Trails. Funding for this project was generously provided by the William Penn Foundation. AMC wishes to thank its partners and key stakeholders for their help and support. Berks Nature Friends of Chester Valley Trail Sarah Chudnovsky Tim Lander Brandywine Conservancy Lawrence Hopewell Trail Corporation Sheila Fleming Becky Taylor Bucks County Planning Commission Montgomery County Planning Commission Paul Gordon Henry Stroud Chester County Planning Commission Natural Lands Rachael Griffith Carol DeWolf Delaware River City Corporation Pottstown Area Regional Recreation Committee Jim Fries Michael Lane Delaware County Planning Department Schuylkill River Greenways NHA Steven Beckley Robert Folwell Julie Delmuto Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Shawn Megill Legendre Cover photos credit: Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Area: https://delawareandlehigh.org/blog/image-gallery/ Appalachian Mountain Club, March 2019 1 PROTECTING SIGNIFICANT VIEWS ALONG THE CIRCUIT Introduction AMC promotes the protection, enjoyment, and understanding of the mountains, forests, waters, and trails of the Appalachian region. AMC believes these resources have intrinsic worth and provide recreational opportunities, spiritual renewal, and ecological and economic health for the region. Because successful conservation depends on active engagement with the outdoors, AMC encourages people to experience, learn about, appreciate, and understand the natural world. AMC is an active member of The Circuit Coalition and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Visual Assessment Report
    PROTECTING SIGNIFICANT VIEWS ALONG THE CIRCUIT: A VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES FOR VIEWSHEDS ALONG THE CIRCUIT TRAILS BIG WOODS TRAIL March 2019 PREPARED BY: APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN CLUB Catherine Poppenwimer Patricia McCloskey, AICP Dave Publicover PROTECTING SIGNIFICANT VIEWS ALONG THE CIRCUIT Contents Acknowledgments............................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 The Circuit ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Protecting Views Along The Circuit ................................................................................................................................ 2 Big Woods Trail .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Study Area Landscape ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Results for the Big Woods Trail ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Big Woods Trail
    [Show full text]
  • Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste D Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type D Award Allocatio Funding Types
    Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste d Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type d Award Allocatio Funding Types Alverthorpe Manor BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township Cultural Park (6422) 11-3 11 Development $223,000 $136,900 Key - Community Abington Township TAP Trail- Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township (1101296) 22-171 22 Trails $90,000 $90,000 Key - Community Ardsley Wildlife Sanctuary- BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township Development 22-37 22 Development $40,000 $40,000 Key - Community Briar Bush Nature Center Master Site Plan BRC-TAG- Region 1 Abington Township (1007785) 20-12 20 Planning $42,000 $37,000 Key - Community Pool Feasibility Studies BRC-TAG- Region 1 Abington Township (1100063) 21-127 21 Planning $15,000 $15,000 Key - Community Rubicam Avenue Park KEY-PRD-1- Region 1 Abington Township (1) 1 01 Development $25,750 $25,700 Key - Community Demonstration Trail - KEY-PRD-4- Region 1 Abington Township Phase I (1659) 4 04 Development $114,330 $114,000 Key - Community KEY-SC-3- Region 1 Aldan Borough Borough Park (5) 6 03 Development $20,000 $2,000 Key - Community Ambler Pocket Park- Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Ambler Borough (1102237) 23-176 23 Development $102,340 $102,000 Key - Community Comp. Rec. & Park Plan BRC-TAG- Region 1 Ambler Borough (4438) 8-16 08 Planning $10,400 $10,000 Key - Community American Littoral Upper & Middle Soc/Delaware Neshaminy Watershed BRC-RCP- Region 1 Riverkeeper Network Plan (3337) 6-9 06 Planning $62,500 $62,500 Key - Rivers Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste d Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type d Award Allocatio Funding Types Valley View Park - Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Aston Township (1100582) 21-114 21 Development $184,000 $164,000 Key - Community Comp.
    [Show full text]
  • Corridor Analysis for the Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail in Northern Virginia
    Corridor Analysis For The Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail In Northern Virginia June 2011 Acknowledgements The Northern Virginia Regional Commission (NVRC) wishes to acknowledge the following individuals for their contributions to this report: Don Briggs, Superintendent of the Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail for the National Park Service; Liz Cronauer, Fairfax County Park Authority; Mike DePue, Prince William Park Authority; Bill Ference, City of Leesburg Park Director; Yon Lambert, City of Alexandria Department of Transportation; Ursula Lemanski, Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program for the National Park Service; Mark Novak, Loudoun County Park Authority; Patti Pakkala, Prince William County Park Authority; Kate Rudacille, Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority; Jennifer Wampler, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation; and Greg Weiler, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The report is an NVRC staff product, supported with funds provided through a cooperative agreement with the National Capital Region National Park Service. Any assessments, conclusions, or recommendations contained in this report represent the results of the NVRC staff’s technical investigation and do not represent policy positions of the Northern Virginia Regional Commission unless so stated in an adopted resolution of said Commission. The views expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the jurisdictions, the National Park Service, or any of its sub agencies. Funding for this report was through a cooperative agreement with The National Park Service Report prepared by: Debbie Spiliotopoulos, Senior Environmental Planner Northern Virginia Regional Commission with assistance from Samantha Kinzer, Environmental Planner The Northern Virginia Regional Commission 3060 Williams Drive, Suite 510 Fairfax, VA 22031 703.642.0700 www.novaregion.org Page 2 Northern Virginia Regional Commission As of May 2011 Chairman Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • DIRECTION 2020 a Region
    Southeastern Pennsylvania BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY PLAN An Element of the DVRPC Year 2020 Plan DIRECTION 2020 A Region... on the Rise Report 28 T ~ Delaware Valley Regional 'fJI Planning Commission DiRECTION 2020 SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY PLAN prepared by: Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission The Bourse Building 111 S. Independence Mall East Philadelphia, PA 19106-2515 September 1995 fj This report was printed on recycled paper The preparation of this report was funded through federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), as well as by DVRPC's member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for its findings and conclusions, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. Created in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an interstate, intercounty and intercity agency which provides continuing, comprehensive and coordinated planning for the orderly growth and development ofthe Delaware Valley region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties as well as the City of Philadelphia in Pennsylvania and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and Mercer counties in New Jersey. The Commission is an advisory agency which divides its planning and service functions between the Office of the Executive Director, the Office of Public Affairs, and four line Divisions: Transportation Planning, Regional Planning, Regional Information Services Center, and Finance and Administration. DVRPC's mission for the 1990s is to emphasize technical assistance and services and to conduct high priority studies for member state and local governments, while determining and meeting the needs of the private sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Montgomery County the Following Table Sorts the 23 Trail Segments That Are the “In Progress” Or “Pipeline” Categories by County
    Moving the Circuit Forward to Reach Montgomery County The following table sorts the 23 trail segments that are the “in progress” or “pipeline” categories by county. The table provides the trail segment’s name, the trail corridor that it is part of, its mileage and its Community Impact Score. The Community Impact Score evaluates the impact these trails will have on residents based on 500 miles by 2025 equity, length, population, community need and connectivity potential. The combined results led to scores ranging from 0 to 11.9. The trail highlighted in green is the priority trail and is identified on the map in the red. Trail Segment Description Status Community Impact Score Miles Chester Valley Trail CVT Extension East - Phase II In Progress 11.00 3.75 Cross County Trail Joshua Road to Wissahickon Trail In Progress 2.74 1.13 Cross County Trail Pennsylvania Ave. to PA 309 In Progress 4.46 0.45 Cross County Trail PA 309 Overpass to Life Time/TruMark Entrance In Progress 6.69 0.20 Cross County Trail Susquehanna Road to Bantry Drive In Progress 6.00 0.87 Liberty Bell Trail Stony Creek Park to Andale Section In Progress 6.98 0.37 Parkside/Cynwyd Trail City Line Ave. to Montgomery Ave. In Progress 8.32 0.47 Pennypack Trail Byberry Road to County Line Road In Progress 8.30 0.83 Power Line Trail Horsham Road to Montgomery Twp Gazebo Park In Progress 4.93 0.13 Germantown Pike Crossing Power Line Trail Montgomery Twp Gazebo Park to 202 Parkway Trail In Progress 6.80 0.28 Schuylkill River Trail Route 422 to Industrial Highway In Progress 8.04 0.70 Schuylkill River Trail Stenton Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Line Trail Connector Feasibility Study Montgomery Township, Montgomery County, Pa
    POWER LINE TRAIL CONNECTOR FEASIBILITY STUDY MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PA PREPARED BY: DRAFT REPORT December 2013 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Robert J. Birch Candyce Fluehr Chimera Michael J. Fox Jeffrey W. McDonnell Joseph P. Walsh ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Vere Archibald Barry Baker Jeffrey Gibbons Jeanine Hurry Mahbubur R. Meenar Beth Staab Terry Wilson OPEN SPACE COMMITTEE Kim Greene Jay Glickman Laurence Poli Roy Rodriguez Beth Staab PARK& RECREATION BOARD Mark Angelone Linda Brooks Angelo Grasso Kim Greene Michael Okino Al Quasti Anthony Ruggieri PLANNING COMMISSION Michael Beatty Jay Glickman Steve Krumenacker Leon McGuire James Rall Ellen Reynolds Jonathan Trump PAGE This project funded through the Delaware Valley Regional 2 Planning Commission’s (DVRPC’s) Regional Trails Program. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION -PROJECT SCOPE -REGIONAL CONTEXT -PROJECTED USE -TRAIL CHARACTERISTICS INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS -PHYSICAL CONDITIONS -USAGE FEASIBILITY -LEGAL FEASIBILITY METHODOLOGY -EXISTING PLANS AND FIELD INVENTORY -PUBLIC PARTICIPATION -DESIGN CRITERIA RECOMMENDATIONS -TRAIL ALIGNMENT -PROPOSED EASEMENTS -OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE -IMPLEMENTATION -OPINION OF PROBABLE COST -FUNDING -PERMITTING AND COORDINATION APPENDIX -PHOTO REFERENCE SHEETS -MONTGOMERY COUNTY PRIMARY TRAIL NETWORK PLAN -PENNSYLVANIA BIKE ROUTE S PLAN PAGE POWER LINE TRAIL CONNECTOR FEASIBILITY STUDY 3 INTRODUCTION PROJECT SCOPE The purpose of the Montgomery also exist. The Route 202 Parkway trail is a Township Power Line Connector Trail nine (9) mile multi-use trail that runs from Feasibility Study is to evaluate routing Doylestown to Montgomeryville. The other options that will best connect the recently significant trail network that is proposed constructed Route 202 Parkway Trail within the Township is the Power Line Trail. to the partially constructed Power Line This proposed seventeen (17) mile trail Trail.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving the Circuit Forward to Reach 500 Miles by 2025
    Moving the Circuit Forward to Reach 500 miles by 2025 The Circuit Trails Segments — Status as of 2020 Status as of July 2020 Circuit Progress Existing In Progress Pipeline Planned In order to achieve the 2025 goal, approximately 146 miles need to be completed in the next five construction seasons. 148.45 miles have been identified as in a “pipeline” stage, meaning that although a feasibility study has been conducted for these 71 trail projects, design of the project is not completed, or additional obstacles exist, such as lack of public right of way. In total, there are 229.93 miles of trails that are “in progress” or in the “pipeline” stage. If 146 of those 229.93 miles could be constructed by 2025, the 500 mile goal can be achieved. The following tables were prepared by the Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia and Pennsylvania Environmental Council, with input from DVRPC staff and county planners. PA NJ Total miles Total segments In Progress 43.53 miles 37.95 miles 81.48 miles 71 segments Pipeline 92.96 miles 55.49 miles 148.45 miles 71 segments Total miles of In Progress and 136.49 miles 93.44 miles 229.93 miles 142 segments Pipeline segments Completed miles 269.37 miles 83.89 miles 353.26 miles 190 segments Completed, In Progress & Pipe- 405.86 miles 177.33 miles 583.19 miles line miles Circuit Trails Segments 1 Full list of the Circuit Trails Segments that are In-Progress The following lists sort the 142 trail segments that are the “in progress” or “pipeline” categories by county.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Report Highway
    FY 2003-2006 Transportation Improvement Program Pennsylvania Subregion Final Version Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission FY 2003-2006 Transportation Improvement Program Pennsylvania Subregion Highway Projects Final Version Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission DVRPC FY 2003-2006 TIP for PA Final Version Pennsylvania - Highway Program Bucks MPMS# 12782 PA 263, York Road Center Turn Lane TIP# 5759 Cty Line Rd/ Henry Ave & Roberts/Bristol Roadway and Intersection Improvement AQ Code 2015M Warminster Twp. Provide center left turn lane areas and/or median barriers on Old York Road between County Line Road & Henry Ave. and also between Roberts Road & Bristol Road TIP Program Years ($ 000) Later FYs Phase Fund FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FD LOCAL 200 ROW LOCAL 150 CON TBD 2,700 Fiscal Year Total 200 150 0 0 2,700 Total FY 03-06 Cost 350 MPMS# 12871 PA 413, New Rodgers Road TIP# 5020 US 13 (Bristol Pike) - North of Ford Rd. Widen to 4 lanes AQ Code 2005M Bristol Twp., Bristol Boro. This project involves reconstructing the PA 413/US 13 intersection with jughandles, widening to 5 lanes between US 13 and the I-95 Spur, and widening to 4 lanes between the I-95 Spur and Ford Road. TIP Program Years ($ 000) Later FYs Phase Fund FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 CON HWY 2,240 CON DEMO 1,915 CON H-STATE 1,039 CON HWY 2,720 CON H-STATE 680 Fiscal Year Total 5,194 3,400 0 0 0 Total FY 03-06 Cost 8,594 MPMS# 12890 Newtown Bypass Extension TIP# Roadway Reconstruction AQ Code Trenton Urban Area STU Funds($588,000) used for project closeout.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Info for HARB Re Cross County Trail Bridge
    Background Information on Feasibility Study for Cross County Trail Bridge Crossing of Germantown Pike • The Montgomery County Planning Commission is working in partnership with a consultant team led by Gilmore & Associates and joined by Campbell Thomas & Co. to carry out this feasibility study. It is being funded by a Regional Trails Program grant from Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC). • A 2015 feasibility study prepared by Campbell Thomas & Co. for Plymouth Township recommended that the safest means of continuing the Cross County Trail across the intersection of Chemical Road and Germantown Pike (where it currently ends) would be to construct a trail bridge. • This study aims to come up with a preferred alignment for the trail bridge with conceptual level plans and a preliminary cost estimate. • When complete, the Cross County Trail will be about 17 miles long and stretch from the western side of the county to the eastern side. It is a primary trail in the county-wide trail system and will provide a connection between the Schuylkill River Trail and the Pennypack Trail. It is also a part of the regional Circuit Trails network, which now covers 300 miles and will cover 800 miles eventually. • A 3-mile section of the Cross County Trail between the Schuylkill River Trail and the intersection of Chemical Road and Germantown Pike is complete. Segments in Upper Dublin are complete. Currently the county is also studying the section from Upper Dublin through Upper Moreland to Pennypack Trail. Sections through Erdenheim Farm are nearing construction. The county just received funding to complete an advanced feasibility study looking at two sections: from Germantown Pike to Joshua Road; and between Skippack Pike to the Fort Washington SEPTA station.
    [Show full text]
  • Semi-Annual Meeting Presentations
    Circuit Trails Semi-Annual Meeting November 12, 2020 Welcome! Circuit Trails Semi-Annual Agenda • 1:00 - 1:05 Welcome - Sarah Clark Stuart, Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia • 1:05 - 1:10 Trail mileage update and trail counts - Shawn Megill Legendre, Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission • 1:10 - 1:30 Strategic Plan update - Sarah Clark Stuart, Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia • Advocate for Priority Trails to Ensure Region Completes 500 • Promote Diversity, Equity and Inclusion within the Circuit Trails Coalition • Advocate for Diverse and Stable Trail Funding • Provide Guidance on Issues that Serve as Roadblocks to Trail Development • 1:30 - 1:35 Moving the Circuit forward: exploring a right-of-way acquisition program - Shawn Megill Legendre, Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission • 1:35 - 2:05 Marketing and communications update - Brandi Horton, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy • 2:05 - 2:15 Trail damage from Hurricane Isaias round up - Chris Dougherty, Delaware River Waterfront Corporation • 2:15 - 2:25 TrailOff app - analytics and update - Lizzie Hessek, Pennsylvania Environmental Council and Adrienne Mackey, Swim Pony • 2:25 - 2:35 Intersection of Circuit Trails and Vision Zero: Cobbs Creek - Will Fraser, Clean Air Council • 2:35 - 2:55 Circuit Project Showcase • Upper Bucks Rail Trail - Paul Gordon, Bucks County Planning Commission • Route 130 Bypass - Matt Johnson, Burlington County Resource Conservation Department Trail Mileage Update and User Counts Trail Mileage • 12.95 new miles added/to be 278, 34%
    [Show full text]
  • Volume II: Countywide Greenway Plan
    Delaware County Open Space, Recreation, and Greenway Plan Conserve | Enhance | Connect Volume II Countywide Greenway Plan APRIL 2015 Delaware County Open Space, Recreation, and Greenway Plan Conserve | Enhance | Connect Volume II: Countywide Greenway Plan APRIL 2015 Prepared By: Delaware County Planning Department Court House and Government Center 201 West Front Street Media, PA 19063 This Page Intentionally Left Blank This plan is formatted for double-sided printing. Please consider the environment before printing this document This Page Intentionally Left Blank Volume II: Countywide Greenway Plan Acknowledgements Delaware County Council Mario Civera, Jr., Chairman Colleen P. Morrone, Vice Chairman John P. McBlain David J. White Michael F. Culp County Executive Marianne Grace Delaware County Planning Commission Thomas J. O’Brien, AIA, Chairman Thomas J. Judge, Vice Chairman Kenneth J. Zitarelli, Secretary Kathy A. Bogosian Lorraine Bradshaw Patrick L. Patterson William C. Payne Christine Valerio Planning Director Linda F. Hill John E. Pickett, AICP* This project was funded in part by a grant from the Keystone Recreation, Park, and Conservation Fund, Community Conservation Partnership Program, administered by the Bureau of Recreation and Conservation, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. i Volume II: Countywide Greenway Plan Acknowledgements (cont.) Delaware County Planning Department Karen L. Holm, Manager Steven R. Beckley, AICP, Senior Planner Ryan T. Judge, Planner Zachary M. Barner, Planner* Ginny M. McIntosh, Planner* Julie Del Muto, Manager Ron Aquilino, Data and Systems Coordinator Doris K. Cusano, Manager* Louis G. Hufnagle, Planner Thomas P. Shaffer, Manager Anne P. Stauffer, GIS Coordinator * Former staff member Consultant: TPW Design Studios with: Toole Recreation Planning Campbell Thomas & Associates Task Force: Judith Auten Ray McFall Robert Bernhardt Anne Murphy Richard Burke A.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Space and Chapter 4: Trails and Pathways
    OpenChapter Space 3 Over the last decade, Montgomery County’s open space efforts and land preservation strategies have focused on the creation of an open space system for future generations to enjoy. The county’s “open space system” approach uses different open space components as building blocks for a network of interrelated lands and trails. These components include protected natural areas, greenways, county parks and historic sites, trail corridors, preserved farmland, and cultural and historic landscapes. Scenic views and vistas are a common element of all of the open space components. This system of county open space is part of a network that includes existing and future regional open space initiatives, federal and state open space lands, and lands protected by local municipalities and private organi- zations. Montgomery County has already accumulated many of these building blocks, and a growing open space network has begun to take shape due to the combined efforts of the county, federal, state, and local governments, strong partnerships with conser- vation organizations, and many energetic and determined citizen advocates. The first part of this chapter describes the existing open space resources within Montgomery County and available through- out the immediate region. This open space includes permanently preserved land (publicly accessible parkland, natural areas, and greenways) and perma- nently preserved private open space. Trails, farm- land, and historic/cultural resources are covered in detail in subsequent chapters. Montgomery County has a growing open space network. The second part of this chapter describes the strategies, actions, and collaborations that form the plan for completing the open space system.
    [Show full text]