DOCSLIB.ORG

Visual Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Visual Assessment Report PROTECTING SIGNIFICANT VIEWS ALONG THE CIRCUIT: A VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES FOR VIEWSHEDS ALONG THE CIRCUIT TRAILS BIG WOODS TRAIL March 2019 PREPARED BY: APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN CLUB Catherine Poppenwimer Patricia McCloskey, AICP Dave Publicover PROTECTING SIGNIFICANT VIEWS ALONG THE CIRCUIT Contents Acknowledgments............................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 The Circuit ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Protecting Views Along The Circuit ................................................................................................................................ 2 Big Woods Trail .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Study Area Landscape ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Results for the Big Woods Trail ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Big Woods Trail Viewshed ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Study Area Key Observation Points ....................................................................................................................... 6 Parcel Value Assessment ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Big Woods Trail Viewshed Resources ................................................................................................................... 7 Visual Resources ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 Scenic Resources ........................................................................................................................................................ 9 Key Observation Points ......................................................................................................................................... 10 Ownership Fragmentation ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Combined Parcel Value .......................................................................................................................................... 11 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Appendix A: Key Assumptions and Known Data Limitations ................................................................................. 14 Appendix B: Methodology .............................................................................................................................................. 16 Study Area ..................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Approach ....................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Analysis Components .................................................................................................................................................. 17 Combined Parcel Value Score .................................................................................................................................... 22 Additional Information ............................................................................................................................................... 22 List of Tables Table 1: Study Area Municipalities ................................................................................................................................... 3 Table 2: Visual Assessment Summary ........................................................................................................................... 12 Appalachian Mountain Club, March 2019 PROTECTING SIGNIFICANT VIEWS ALONG THE CIRCUIT List of Maps Map 1: Big Woods Trail Study Area ................................................................................................................................ 4 Map 2: Trail Viewshed Area .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Map 3: KOP Viewshed Map ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Map 4: Visibility Resources ............................................................................................................................................... 8 Map 5: Scenic Resources .................................................................................................................................................... 9 Map 6: KOP Resources ................................................................................................................................................... 10 Map 7: Combined Parcel Value ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Map 8: Highest Ranked Parcels with Scenic, Visibility, KOP and Ownership Fragmentation Resources ........ 13 Map 9: Circuit Trails Included in the Study .................................................................................................................. 16 List of Figures Figure 1: Visual Resources Score...................................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 2: Scenic Character Resources Score ................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 3: Combined Parcel Value Score ........................................................................................................................ 11 Figure 4: Visibility Resources .......................................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 5: Scenic Character Resources ............................................................................................................................ 20 Figure 6: Key Observation Points .................................................................................................................................. 21 Figure 7: Ownership Resources ...................................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 8: Methodology Flow Chart ................................................................................................................................ 23 Appalachian Mountain Club, March 2019 PROTECTING SIGNIFICANT VIEWS ALONG THE CIRCUIT Acknowledgments The Appalachian Mountain Club (AMC) would like to acknowledge the many contributors who provided their time and input to the development of Protecting Significant Views Along The Circuit: An Assessment of Land Conservation Priorities for Viewsheds Along The Circuit Trails. Funding for this project was generously provided by the William Penn Foundation. AMC wishes to thank its partners and key stakeholders for their help and support. Berks Nature Friends of Chester Valley Trail Sarah Chudnovsky Tim Lander Brandywine Conservancy Lawrence Hopewell Trail Corporation Sheila Fleming Becky Taylor Bucks County Planning Commission Montgomery County Planning Commission Paul Gordon Henry Stroud Chester County Planning Commission Natural Lands Rachael Griffith Carol DeWolf Delaware River City Corporation Pottstown Area Regional Recreation Committee Jim Fries Michael Lane Delaware County Planning Department Schuylkill River Greenways NHA Steven Beckley Robert Folwell Julie Delmuto Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Shawn Megill Legendre Cover photos credit: Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Area: https://delawareandlehigh.org/blog/image-gallery/ Appalachian Mountain Club, March 2019 1 PROTECTING SIGNIFICANT VIEWS ALONG THE CIRCUIT Introduction AMC promotes the protection, enjoyment, and understanding of the mountains, forests, waters, and trails of the Appalachian region. AMC believes these resources have intrinsic worth and provide recreational opportunities, spiritual renewal, and ecological and economic health for the region. Because successful conservation depends on active engagement with the outdoors, AMC encourages people to experience, learn about, appreciate, and understand the natural world. AMC is an active member of The Circuit Coalition and has been advancing recreation planning, conservation and outdoor recreation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Power Line Trail
    PROTECTING SIGNIFICA NT VIEWS ALONG THE CIRCUIT: A VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES FOR VIEWSHEDS ALONG THE CIRCUIT TRAILS POWER LINE TRAIL March 2019 PREPARED BY: APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN CLUB Catherine Poppenwimer Patricia McCloskey, AICP Dave Publicover PROTECTING SIGNIFICANT VIEWS ALONG THE CIRCUIT Contents Acknowledgments............................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 The Circuit ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Protecting Views Along The Circuit ................................................................................................................................ 2 Power Line Trail ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Study Area Landscape ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Results for the Power Line Trail ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Power Line
    [Show full text]
  • DIRECTION 2020 a Region
    Southeastern Pennsylvania BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY PLAN An Element of the DVRPC Year 2020 Plan DIRECTION 2020 A Region... on the Rise Report 28 T ~ Delaware Valley Regional 'fJI Planning Commission DiRECTION 2020 SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY PLAN prepared by: Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission The Bourse Building 111 S. Independence Mall East Philadelphia, PA 19106-2515 September 1995 fj This report was printed on recycled paper The preparation of this report was funded through federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), as well as by DVRPC's member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for its findings and conclusions, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. Created in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an interstate, intercounty and intercity agency which provides continuing, comprehensive and coordinated planning for the orderly growth and development ofthe Delaware Valley region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties as well as the City of Philadelphia in Pennsylvania and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and Mercer counties in New Jersey. The Commission is an advisory agency which divides its planning and service functions between the Office of the Executive Director, the Office of Public Affairs, and four line Divisions: Transportation Planning, Regional Planning, Regional Information Services Center, and Finance and Administration. DVRPC's mission for the 1990s is to emphasize technical assistance and services and to conduct high priority studies for member state and local governments, while determining and meeting the needs of the private sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Montgomery County the Following Table Sorts the 23 Trail Segments That Are the “In Progress” Or “Pipeline” Categories by County
    Moving the Circuit Forward to Reach Montgomery County The following table sorts the 23 trail segments that are the “in progress” or “pipeline” categories by county. The table provides the trail segment’s name, the trail corridor that it is part of, its mileage and its Community Impact Score. The Community Impact Score evaluates the impact these trails will have on residents based on 500 miles by 2025 equity, length, population, community need and connectivity potential. The combined results led to scores ranging from 0 to 11.9. The trail highlighted in green is the priority trail and is identified on the map in the red. Trail Segment Description Status Community Impact Score Miles Chester Valley Trail CVT Extension East - Phase II In Progress 11.00 3.75 Cross County Trail Joshua Road to Wissahickon Trail In Progress 2.74 1.13 Cross County Trail Pennsylvania Ave. to PA 309 In Progress 4.46 0.45 Cross County Trail PA 309 Overpass to Life Time/TruMark Entrance In Progress 6.69 0.20 Cross County Trail Susquehanna Road to Bantry Drive In Progress 6.00 0.87 Liberty Bell Trail Stony Creek Park to Andale Section In Progress 6.98 0.37 Parkside/Cynwyd Trail City Line Ave. to Montgomery Ave. In Progress 8.32 0.47 Pennypack Trail Byberry Road to County Line Road In Progress 8.30 0.83 Power Line Trail Horsham Road to Montgomery Twp Gazebo Park In Progress 4.93 0.13 Germantown Pike Crossing Power Line Trail Montgomery Twp Gazebo Park to 202 Parkway Trail In Progress 6.80 0.28 Schuylkill River Trail Route 422 to Industrial Highway In Progress 8.04 0.70 Schuylkill River Trail Stenton Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Line Trail Connector Feasibility Study Montgomery Township, Montgomery County, Pa
    POWER LINE TRAIL CONNECTOR FEASIBILITY STUDY MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PA PREPARED BY: DRAFT REPORT December 2013 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Robert J. Birch Candyce Fluehr Chimera Michael J. Fox Jeffrey W. McDonnell Joseph P. Walsh ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Vere Archibald Barry Baker Jeffrey Gibbons Jeanine Hurry Mahbubur R. Meenar Beth Staab Terry Wilson OPEN SPACE COMMITTEE Kim Greene Jay Glickman Laurence Poli Roy Rodriguez Beth Staab PARK& RECREATION BOARD Mark Angelone Linda Brooks Angelo Grasso Kim Greene Michael Okino Al Quasti Anthony Ruggieri PLANNING COMMISSION Michael Beatty Jay Glickman Steve Krumenacker Leon McGuire James Rall Ellen Reynolds Jonathan Trump PAGE This project funded through the Delaware Valley Regional 2 Planning Commission’s (DVRPC’s) Regional Trails Program. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION -PROJECT SCOPE -REGIONAL CONTEXT -PROJECTED USE -TRAIL CHARACTERISTICS INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS -PHYSICAL CONDITIONS -USAGE FEASIBILITY -LEGAL FEASIBILITY METHODOLOGY -EXISTING PLANS AND FIELD INVENTORY -PUBLIC PARTICIPATION -DESIGN CRITERIA RECOMMENDATIONS -TRAIL ALIGNMENT -PROPOSED EASEMENTS -OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE -IMPLEMENTATION -OPINION OF PROBABLE COST -FUNDING -PERMITTING AND COORDINATION APPENDIX -PHOTO REFERENCE SHEETS -MONTGOMERY COUNTY PRIMARY TRAIL NETWORK PLAN -PENNSYLVANIA BIKE ROUTE S PLAN PAGE POWER LINE TRAIL CONNECTOR FEASIBILITY STUDY 3 INTRODUCTION PROJECT SCOPE The purpose of the Montgomery also exist. The Route 202 Parkway trail is a Township Power Line Connector Trail nine (9) mile multi-use trail that runs from Feasibility Study is to evaluate routing Doylestown to Montgomeryville. The other options that will best connect the recently significant trail network that is proposed constructed Route 202 Parkway Trail within the Township is the Power Line Trail. to the partially constructed Power Line This proposed seventeen (17) mile trail Trail.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving the Circuit Forward to Reach 500 Miles by 2025
    Moving the Circuit Forward to Reach 500 miles by 2025 The Circuit Trails Segments — Status as of 2020 Status as of July 2020 Circuit Progress Existing In Progress Pipeline Planned In order to achieve the 2025 goal, approximately 146 miles need to be completed in the next five construction seasons. 148.45 miles have been identified as in a “pipeline” stage, meaning that although a feasibility study has been conducted for these 71 trail projects, design of the project is not completed, or additional obstacles exist, such as lack of public right of way. In total, there are 229.93 miles of trails that are “in progress” or in the “pipeline” stage. If 146 of those 229.93 miles could be constructed by 2025, the 500 mile goal can be achieved. The following tables were prepared by the Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia and Pennsylvania Environmental Council, with input from DVRPC staff and county planners. PA NJ Total miles Total segments In Progress 43.53 miles 37.95 miles 81.48 miles 71 segments Pipeline 92.96 miles 55.49 miles 148.45 miles 71 segments Total miles of In Progress and 136.49 miles 93.44 miles 229.93 miles 142 segments Pipeline segments Completed miles 269.37 miles 83.89 miles 353.26 miles 190 segments Completed, In Progress & Pipe- 405.86 miles 177.33 miles 583.19 miles line miles Circuit Trails Segments 1 Full list of the Circuit Trails Segments that are In-Progress The following lists sort the 142 trail segments that are the “in progress” or “pipeline” categories by county.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Info for HARB Re Cross County Trail Bridge
    Background Information on Feasibility Study for Cross County Trail Bridge Crossing of Germantown Pike • The Montgomery County Planning Commission is working in partnership with a consultant team led by Gilmore & Associates and joined by Campbell Thomas & Co. to carry out this feasibility study. It is being funded by a Regional Trails Program grant from Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC). • A 2015 feasibility study prepared by Campbell Thomas & Co. for Plymouth Township recommended that the safest means of continuing the Cross County Trail across the intersection of Chemical Road and Germantown Pike (where it currently ends) would be to construct a trail bridge. • This study aims to come up with a preferred alignment for the trail bridge with conceptual level plans and a preliminary cost estimate. • When complete, the Cross County Trail will be about 17 miles long and stretch from the western side of the county to the eastern side. It is a primary trail in the county-wide trail system and will provide a connection between the Schuylkill River Trail and the Pennypack Trail. It is also a part of the regional Circuit Trails network, which now covers 300 miles and will cover 800 miles eventually. • A 3-mile section of the Cross County Trail between the Schuylkill River Trail and the intersection of Chemical Road and Germantown Pike is complete. Segments in Upper Dublin are complete. Currently the county is also studying the section from Upper Dublin through Upper Moreland to Pennypack Trail. Sections through Erdenheim Farm are nearing construction. The county just received funding to complete an advanced feasibility study looking at two sections: from Germantown Pike to Joshua Road; and between Skippack Pike to the Fort Washington SEPTA station.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume II: Countywide Greenway Plan
    Delaware County Open Space, Recreation, and Greenway Plan Conserve | Enhance | Connect Volume II Countywide Greenway Plan APRIL 2015 Delaware County Open Space, Recreation, and Greenway Plan Conserve | Enhance | Connect Volume II: Countywide Greenway Plan APRIL 2015 Prepared By: Delaware County Planning Department Court House and Government Center 201 West Front Street Media, PA 19063 This Page Intentionally Left Blank This plan is formatted for double-sided printing. Please consider the environment before printing this document This Page Intentionally Left Blank Volume II: Countywide Greenway Plan Acknowledgements Delaware County Council Mario Civera, Jr., Chairman Colleen P. Morrone, Vice Chairman John P. McBlain David J. White Michael F. Culp County Executive Marianne Grace Delaware County Planning Commission Thomas J. O’Brien, AIA, Chairman Thomas J. Judge, Vice Chairman Kenneth J. Zitarelli, Secretary Kathy A. Bogosian Lorraine Bradshaw Patrick L. Patterson William C. Payne Christine Valerio Planning Director Linda F. Hill John E. Pickett, AICP* This project was funded in part by a grant from the Keystone Recreation, Park, and Conservation Fund, Community Conservation Partnership Program, administered by the Bureau of Recreation and Conservation, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. i Volume II: Countywide Greenway Plan Acknowledgements (cont.) Delaware County Planning Department Karen L. Holm, Manager Steven R. Beckley, AICP, Senior Planner Ryan T. Judge, Planner Zachary M. Barner, Planner* Ginny M. McIntosh, Planner* Julie Del Muto, Manager Ron Aquilino, Data and Systems Coordinator Doris K. Cusano, Manager* Louis G. Hufnagle, Planner Thomas P. Shaffer, Manager Anne P. Stauffer, GIS Coordinator * Former staff member Consultant: TPW Design Studios with: Toole Recreation Planning Campbell Thomas & Associates Task Force: Judith Auten Ray McFall Robert Bernhardt Anne Murphy Richard Burke A.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Space and Chapter 4: Trails and Pathways
    OpenChapter Space 3 Over the last decade, Montgomery County’s open space efforts and land preservation strategies have focused on the creation of an open space system for future generations to enjoy. The county’s “open space system” approach uses different open space components as building blocks for a network of interrelated lands and trails. These components include protected natural areas, greenways, county parks and historic sites, trail corridors, preserved farmland, and cultural and historic landscapes. Scenic views and vistas are a common element of all of the open space components. This system of county open space is part of a network that includes existing and future regional open space initiatives, federal and state open space lands, and lands protected by local municipalities and private organi- zations. Montgomery County has already accumulated many of these building blocks, and a growing open space network has begun to take shape due to the combined efforts of the county, federal, state, and local governments, strong partnerships with conser- vation organizations, and many energetic and determined citizen advocates. The first part of this chapter describes the existing open space resources within Montgomery County and available through- out the immediate region. This open space includes permanently preserved land (publicly accessible parkland, natural areas, and greenways) and perma- nently preserved private open space. Trails, farm- land, and historic/cultural resources are covered in detail in subsequent chapters. Montgomery County has a growing open space network. The second part of this chapter describes the strategies, actions, and collaborations that form the plan for completing the open space system.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Commissioners Action Item Request
    Upper Gwynedd Township 1 Parkside Place North Wales, PA 19454 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION ITEM REQUEST Date: July 7, 2020 To: Board of Commissioners From: Sandra Brookley Zadell, Township Manager Re: Trail RFP Consultant Meeting Date: July 13, 2020 Background: As you know the BOC authorized an RFP for a consultant to perform the Powerline Trail Feasibility Study. We received ten responses to our RFP, and Sarah Prebis and I reviewed all 10 proposals. We narrowed those proposals down to four firms that Commissioner Damsker and Commissioner McNaney and Sarah and I then interviewed. All of the proposals were strong and interesting but, in the end, we decided to go with Michael Baker International, Inc’s proposal. Chris Stanford and his team have worked on over 100 miles of trails. Chris and his associate Michael Szilagi who will be our main team contacts are very knowledgeable with our area. Michael lives in North Wales Borough and uses our trails system currently. The firm has strong relationships and experience with trails that impact SEPTA and rail crossings (which our trails impact). Chris was the trail design professional on the 202-parkway trail and has experience acquiring easements from PECO and Delaware Valley University both of which are required with this portion of our trail system. Finally, their proposal includes the use of Wikimaps, which includes an interactive tool that residents can access on our website and social media to share their thoughts, concerns, and opinions about our plans. This forward-thinking approach utilizing technology for resident outreach was interesting to us.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Trail Network
    M C Primary Trail Network Lehigh County Bucks County 20 LINE RD 2 COUNTY LINE RD COUNTY LINE RD UNTY CO 0 2 D Y E Telford R Lower T E L W L Y U H E 232 K T I V O E S P Moreland Souderton A R E N K 611 TPKE I T I Graeme BYBERRY RD R S P 16 AL Hatfield 152 Hatboro F LENTO ARLEYSVILLE O I N Park GRAVEL N EASTON RD PI 7 E KE U 309 202 H N-H V WN RD AD ST A O East 563 PIKE UPPER J T O Horsham ERTO HORSHAM RD N Greenville COWPATH RD BR 263 3 Marlborough 5 463 O L Bryn Athyn M G SOUD Montgomery IMEKILN PIKE IL E Hatfield D Pennsburg D H R R D Y P R R YORK RD 18 V Salford S 9 I Borough L E N R Pen L L BETHL E E Upper A Red Hill P Franconia H I EHEM PIKE OW S 63 K W nyp 17 E 63 E 20 R Moreland H E RD PEN RIST KU T R D ack Creek TZTO R WN G NSYLVANIA T R O 276 ELSH RD D D O Green Lane I N W R MAIN ST N WELSH RD D Lansdale L Reservoir 63 63 OLD O E PKE B K ALLENTOWN RD L I E YORK RD P Upper Hanover A K K I FORT W 7 ASH N D KNIGHT E P IN Lorimer 113 O G R 29 R PIKE D T RD D T E O N L O Upper RD G Park Green T N W SUMNEY N O TOWN PIKE Morgan LEY RD I U F O H RD H C PIKE North B NSYLVANIA Dublin T SUMNYETOWN T E Lane 476 Y E VAL MAIN ST Log House X R T 63 P N a BETHL Y D E D R 611 Wales U R U H Green s PEN T R R 3 PIKE H O t C Lower EHEM PIKE A F SUSQUEHANNA RD D SUMNEYTOWN PIKE E 19L Lane W E E Z N PIKE I B N Gwynedd Y T O R F h 232 c P I Park ra n R L Y e T F R H L 309 r A EAS Upper Salford k Abington E N 152 L i Lower Salford T EXT Upper E o J V Perk P E Rockledge GRAVEL PIKE NK m IN N RD N O T S A Gwynedd T E 15 OWN RD iomen e Towamencin Ambler n
    [Show full text]
  • Moving the Circuit Forward to Reach 500 Miles by 2025
    Moving the Circuit Forward To Reach 500 miles by 2025 How Greater Philadelphia can accelerate and advance progress on The Circuit Trails The Circuit Trails Coalition — November 2019 Kinkora Trail Background. .p.2 This report was prepared by members of the Circuit Trails Coalition II. Status as of July 2019 . .p.4 Steering Committee, including Sarah Clark Stuart, Bicycle Coalition of III. Policy Recommendations . .p.5 Greater Philadelphia; Patrick Starr, Pennsylvania Environmental Council; Recommendations for DVRPC . .p.5 and Sonia Szczesna, Tri-State Transportation Campaign. Data provided by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission. Recommendations for Counties . .p.8 Recommendations for PennDOT . .p.9 Support for this report was provided by the William Penn Foundation. Recommendations for NJDOT . .p.9 Table of Contents Table Recommendations for NJDEP . .p.11 Recommendations for the Circuit Trails Coalition . .p.12 III. Circuit Critical Gaps . .p.13 IV. Full list of the Circuit Trails segments that are In-Progress and Pipeline . p.14 Moving the Circuit Forward 1 Moving the Circuit Forward To Reach 500 miles by 2025 I. Background In 2013, Greater Philadelphia committed itself to the goal of completing This report is the result of over a year’s worth of work conducted by 750 miles of the Circuit by 2040. This goal is embedded in the region’s members of the Circuit Trails Coalition to identify which segments 2040 Long Range Plan1, which cited the Circuit as one of the region’s could contribute to reaching the 500 miles by 2025 goal. There are significant major bicycle/pedestrian projects. The Circuit Trails two important databases that help the Circuit Trails Coalition track Coalition is comprised of over 54 non profit organizations that work in progress toward building out the Circuit.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Primary Trail Network
    M ONTGOMERY C OUNTY 2011 Primary Trail Network Lehigh County Bucks County COUNTY LINE RD GERYVILLE Telford RD BETHLEHEM D Souderton R OLD 332 Lower LIMEKILN S Graeme L OU 611 L 202 I DERTON RD Park Moreland M BYBERRY RD GRAVEL DAVISVILLE R 29 I PI Hatfield 16 EASTON A Hatboro K E L AVE East B 113 HUNTINGDON Montgomery YORK HORSHAM 3 Greenville Salford COWPATH RD RD 463 Pennsburg Marlborough Hatfield 7Bryn P Horsham Upper E ALLENTOWN Borough Athyn Red N N 263 S 9 RD Hanover Y 5 L PIKE Hill RIDGE VA Upper N PHILMONT IA PIKE T RD Moreland KUTZTOWN U RD I-276 RN 152 P RD PIKE Franconia IK Lansdale E WELSH Green 563 N WELSH RD 63 O 63 RD Lane PIKE R 63 TH Park EA OLD S RD RD Lorimer T T EASTON KNIGHT RD E E O OLD Park K O 8 I X MA T IN F PIKE ST P DEKALB E N 309 S Green IO E N SUMNEYTOWN L Morgan NORRISTOWN 6 3 232 Lane L I Log House V S North Lower Y Y FOR T BETHLEHEM T E Abington R Wales W L A O R S 3 PIKE Gwynedd H F A 7 IN RD 63 PIKE H 4 G 611 T Upper SK - O I PPACK RD N N YORK O Upper Dublin T Towamencin E R X Upper E P D Gwynedd R U Lower E FORGE Rockledge O S S Salford S Ambler W 15 A Salford Y LIMEKILN Upper RD Evans- Jenkintown Frederick 29 MORRIS Mumbower TOWNSHIP LINE RD Mill RD I-476 202 73 HOFFMANSVILLE Lower 9 PIKE 73 LAYFIELD Frederick The Highlands PIKE Peter Wentz PIKE 5 RD RD Farmstead PIKE Whitpain CHURCH Cheltenham 14 73 Hope Lodge CREEK Douglass 73 RD Pennypacker SKIPPACK 2 RD 73 BIG RD Mills Worcester Fort Schwenksville RD Washington 152 New State Park CHELTENHAM AVE TOOKANY PIKE D ROAD E R K Central I P L Hanover BUTLER
    [Show full text]