DOCSLIB.ORG

Interest Groups and Supreme Court of Canada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interest Groups and Supreme Court of Canada University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies Legacy Theses 1997 Interest groups and Supreme Court of Canada Brodie, Ian Brodie, I. (1997). Interest groups and Supreme Court of Canada (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/17910 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/26950 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca THE UMWRWIY OF CALGARY Interest Groups and Supreme Court ofcanada by Ian Brodie A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL E;ULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL, SCIENCE CALGARY,ALBERTA FEBRUARY, 1997 O Tan Brodie 1997 Acquisii and Acquisitions et BbliographE Senkes setvices biùiibgraphiques The author has granted a non- L'aateur a acwrdé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the National Li'brary of Canada to Bibliothèque dodedu Canada de reproduce, lom, disûi'bute or sel1 reprodime, prêter, distribuer ou copies of Mer thesis by any meam venQedescopiesdesathèse& and in any form or format, making cpelque manière et sous 9ue1que this thesis aW1eto interested forme que a soit pour mettre des persons. exemplaires de cette thèse à la disposition des personnes intéressées. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur coaserve la propriété du copyright in Merthesis. Neithek &oit d'auteur qui protège sa thèse. Ni the thesis nor substantiai extracts la thése ni des eraraits substdeîs de nom it may be printed or othbse celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés ou reproduced with the author's autrementreppoduits sans son permission. autorisation. Abstract Since the Charter of Rights was added to Canada's constitutional law in 1982, Canada's courts have gaineci influence as political institutions. Cartndian poIitical sàentists have started to study the courts wah the varbus tools of social science aiid while this first generation research bas noted that interest groups are paying new attention to the courts, most of it bas been sporadicYunsystdc and anecdotal. This dissertation investigates two principai research questions. First, to what extent have interest groups taken advantage ofthe shiA of politicai duence towards the judiciaqt? Secondly, to what extent am the groups that have taken advmtage of the judiciary's new influence be considered "poiiticaliy disadvantaged"? The first chapter reviews how the "political disadvantage theory" of interest group litigation emerged in the US aad Canada. Since 1980, American scholars have concluded the theory is too aaorow, and 1demonstrate that it never did descri'be the Canadian expenence. Interest groups litigate to take advantage of the institutioaal structure of the courts. The second chapter traces the history of interest group intervention in the Canadian Supreme Court. During the 1980s, interest groups and legal commentators urged the Court to hear from more interest group intemeners. The Court responded by openiag its door to an unprecedented nwber of groups. Chapter three shows how the federal goverament used the Court Challenges Program to encourage interest group litigation. The fourth chapter argues that interest group litigation under the Charter's equaiity rigbts section creates a politics of status-seeking, and elaborates a mode1 to explain equality rigbts litigatïon. Chapter five proposes a theory of the Charter's impact on the institutional hmework of poiicy-makmg in Canada. It suggests how judicial review altas the influence of interest groups in poiicy- making. Finallyychapter six considers the Supreme Court's justifications for hearhg iii interest groups in the light of modem coILStitllfionalismls conani for checks and balances. Although the politicai didvantage theory bas been used to legitimate the Court's actMsm under the Charter ofRights, the disertation concludes that it is a poor empirical explanation of the reality of hterest group Litigation. Aclmowledgements Fifst, 1thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Councii of Canada (Doctoral Feiiowship 752-94-1495), the Alberta Heritage Scholarshïp Fund, the Külam Trust and the Department of Politid Science for th& generous support ovathe past four years. Some of the data used here were collectecl with research gants fiom the Department of Justice and the University of Calgary Research Grants Cornmittee. The staff of the Process CSce and the Court Records mce at the Supreme Court of Canaâa graoted me access to th& archives and patieutly accornrnodated my research needs. W~thoutth& help 1could not bave Wriffen key paris of this dissertation. Sonya Nerlund assisted me during my first visit to the Court's archives. The access to uiformation statfs of the Department of Canadian Heritage, the Department of Justice, the Department of the Secretary of State aml the Privy Cod Office courteously processed my mmy access requests. Chapter 4 is reprinted by hdpermission of the Editor of Comoarative Politics. 1 thank the Honourable Mi. Justice John C. Major, W. Ivan Whitehall, Daniel Themen, Awy Go, and a fonner senior federal cabinet minister for geaerously aîlowing me to inte~ewthem Their invaluable insights infomed the entire dissertaiion- Many outstanding political scientists pve me wondemil guidance and comments, particuiarly Drs. Rainer Knopff, Nd Nevitte, Roger Giibins, Thomas Flanagan, Leslie Pd, Anthony Perl, Stan Drabek, James Keeley, Christopher IMia&ecîi, Michael Lusztig, Patrick James, Roy Flemming, Charles Epp and Keith Brownsey. They have ali earned my respect and admiration. Many fiends have helped me in many ways, includbg Fred Wall, Marco Navamo-Genie, Dominique Navarro-Fournier, Mebs Kmji Butch Kamena, Chrissy Carbeny and Lori Hausegger. Prof, PbckMonahan and Judy Karwacki helped with certain chapters. Jane Waish first piqued my interest in intemeners- Tbanlt you ail. 1 must th& my Neil Brodie, Chaud Soaraq Sujit Choudbty and Mathew Englander in partïcular for their fneodship. Tbey helped in more ways than they know. 1 owe a great debt to Dr. Ted Morton. Over the past six years I have corne to know him as a supervisor, advisor, collaborator and niend. By balancing tme scholarship, active citizenship and bis private üfe he has set a good example for me to emulate. 1 hope that this dissertation is oniy the first of many projects we will work on together. Finally, I thank my dearest Lynn She was patient when 1was cranky- understanding when 1worked long hours, and supportive and loving throughout. Ifwe can make it through a dissertation we can deit through anything. Dedication For Mom and Dad, who always aicourageci me. Table of Contents Cbapter 1: Intertst Groups in Court: Tbe Poütid Disadviatige Theoy and .,....,..,..o...........o...................o....oo.o........o...o...................o..o.ooe......e..... Beyond .,....,..,..o...........o...................o....oo.o........o...o...................o..o.ooe......e..... 7 The Emergence of the Politicai Disadvantage Theory ............................................. 8 The Dernise of the Political Disadvantage Theory .................................................. 11 The Po liticai Disadvantage Theory in Canada.. ....................................................... 16 "Beyond the Politicai Disadvamage Theory" ......................................................... 20 The Institutional Dimension to Interest Group Litigation .......................... .... 21 The Institutional Dimension in Practice .................................................................. 24 . -. Litigation as Political Partmpation............... .. .......**...-........................................28 Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 3 5 Cbapter 2: Interest Groups, the Supreme Court and htervention ............. ........... 36 . The Onguis of Inte~ention..... ... ..................................................................... -37 Early Caiiadian Intemeners .................................................................................... 38 An American Legai Export: From NAACP and ACLU to LEAF and CCLA .......... 39 Institutional Retoohg and Intemeners at the Supreme Court .............. .. ............ 48 Intemeners a. the Supreme Court since the Charter. ............................................... 50 Applications for Leave to Intervene: 19854990 .................................................... 55 Interveners at the Supreme Coiut: 1984 to 1993 .................................................... 64 Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 71 Chapter 3: haterest Gmup LitSgation and StatoSocitty Relations.......* ..... ........ .... 73 The State-Society Distinction in the Charter Literature .......................................... 74 Statecentrd Theories ..................... ...... .............................................................. 76 The Private and Public Spoasorship of Interest Groups ..........................................80 The Secretary of State and Interest Groups ........................................................... 86 Govenunent
Load more

Recommended publications
  • J. Willard Hurst Collection, 1932 - 1997 Finding Aid
    J. Willard Hurst Collection, 1932 - 1997 Finding Aid Pen and ink drawing of Hurst by Elliot Banfield Appeared with column about Hurst in the New York Times (March 23, 1990) University of Wisconsin Law Library 975 Bascom Mall Madison, WI 53706 June, 2007 University of Wisconsin Law School © Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System Summary Information: Repository: University of Wisconsin Law Library Creator: Hurst, J. Willard Quantity: 38 archives boxes, 15 books, 6 binders, and 1 typewriter Processing Information: Prepared by Bonnie Shucha, Stephanie Rytilahti, and Steven Weber, January 2003 – June 2007 Access Restrictions: Access to these papers is governed by the rules and regulations of the University of Wisconsin Law Library. This collection is open to the public, but is housed in the library’s Rare Book Room. Consult the library staff for further information. Use Restrictions: Requests for permission to publish material from this collection should be directed to the UW Law Library staff. Researchers who obtain permission to publish from the library are also responsible for identifying and contacting the persons or organizations who hold copyright. Scope and Content: The J. Willard Hurst Collection details the career of the man commonly identified as the father of modern American legal history. The collection primarily spans the years 1932 through Hurst’s death in 1997. The bulk of material dates between 1946 and 1980 when Hurst was a professor at the University of Wisconsin Law School, where he developed the field of American legal economic history through his scholarship and teaching. The collection provides insight into the evolution of Hurst’s view of legal history and his role in developing a community for legal historians.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf; Last Accessed August 10, 2012
    Notes Chapter 1 1. There are, of course, many “Americas.” Here, I use the word “America” interchangeably with the “United States.” I also use the words “work” and “labor” interchangeably throughout this book. This is a self-conscious decision in spite of the distinction Hannah Arendt draws between work and labor. See Hannah Arendt, The Human Condition (Chicago: Univer- sity of Chicago Press, 1998). 2. To be sure, the occurrence of the word “dream” in these speeches may or may not refer to the American Dream as such. Yet, a close reading of the texts yields the conclusion that it most often does. These speeches are available at the University of California, Santa Barbara’s “American Presidency Project” website. Available at http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/; last accessed August 5, 2012. The numbers cited here reflect the follow- ing methodological considerations: (a) I have only taken into account the first of a series of six State of the Union addresses by Richard Nixon (1973); (b) I have excluded Reagan’s (1981), Bush’s (1989), Clinton’s (1993), Bush’s (2001), and Obama’s (2009) addresses before joint sessions of Congress because these were not technically State of the Union mes- sages; and (c) the word “undreamed” has been counted as an occurrence of the word “dream.” 3. See, especially, figure 2.1. More generally, see chapters 3 and 6. 4. Jennifer L. Hochschild, Facing Up to the American Dream: Race, Class, and the Soul of the Nation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995), xvii. 5. National League of Cities, “The American Dream in 2004: A Sur- vey of the American People” (Washington D.C., 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • CINDY D. KAM Department of Political Science Vanderbilt University PMB 0505 Nashville, TN 37203-5721 615.322.4946 [email protected]
    CINDY D. KAM Department of Political Science Vanderbilt University PMB 0505 Nashville, TN 37203-5721 615.322.4946 [email protected] ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2015 – William R. Kenan, Jr. Professor of Political Science, Vanderbilt University Current Professor of Psychology (by courtesy) Professor of Medicine, Health, and Society (by courtesy) 2013 – Professor of Political Science, Vanderbilt University 2008 – 2013 Associate Professor of Political Science, Vanderbilt University 2003 – 2008 Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of California, Davis ADMINISTRATIVE APPOINTMENTS 2018 – 2019 Associate Chair, Department of Political Science, Vanderbilt University 2014 – 2016 Senior Associate Dean for Faculty, College of Arts & Science, Vanderbilt University 2013 – 2014 Associate Chair, Department of Political Science, Vanderbilt University 2011 – 2014 Director of Graduate Studies, Department of Political Science, Vanderbilt University EDUCATION 2003 Ph.D., University of Michigan Department of Political Science Major Fields: American Politics and Political Methodology 2000 M.A., University of Michigan Department of Political Science 1996 A.B., Princeton University Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs. Summa cum laude. Phi Beta Kappa. PUBLICATIONS BOOKS Kinder, Donald R. and Cindy D. Kam. 2009. Us Against Them: Ethnocentric Foundations of American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kam, Cindy D. and Robert J. Franzese, Jr. 2007. Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. ARTICLES Kam, Cindy D. and Maggie Deichert. 2020. “Boycotts, Buycotts, and the Psychology of Political Consumerism.” Journal of Politics 82(1): 72-88. Kam, Cindy D. 2020. “‘And Why Is That a Partisan Issue?’ Source Cues, Persuasion, and School Lunches.” Journal of Politics 82(1): 361-366.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Decolonization: Toward a Comprehensive Black Politics
    NATIONAL POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW VOLUME 20.1 INSTITUTIONAL DECOLONIZATION: TOWARD A COMPREHENSIVE BLACK POLITICS A PUBLICATION OF THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BLACK POLITICAL SCIENTISTS A PUBLICATION OF THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BLACK POLITICAL SCIENTISTS NATIONAL POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW VOLUME 20.1 INSTITUTIONAL DECOLONIZATION: TOWARD A COMPREHENSIVE BLACK POLITICS A PUBLICATION OF THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BLACK POLITICAL SCIENTISTS National Political Science Review | ii THE NATIONAL POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW EDITORS Managing Editor Tiffany Willoughby-Herard University of California, Irvine Duchess Harris Macalester College Sharon D. Wright Austin The University of Florida Angela K. Lewis University of Alabama, Birmingham BOOK REVIEW EDITOR Brandy Thomas Wells Oklahoma State University EDITORIAL RESEARCH ASSISTANTS Lisa Beard Armand Demirchyan LaShonda Carter Amber Gordon Ashley Daniels Deshanda Edwards EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD Melina Abdullah—California State University, Los Angeles Keisha Lindsey—University of Wisconsin Anthony Affigne—Providence College Clarence Lusane—American University Nikol Alexander-Floyd—Rutgers University Maruice Mangum—Alabama State University Russell Benjamin—Northeastern Illinois University Lorenzo Morris—Howard University Nadia Brown—Purdue University Richard T. Middleton IV—University of Missouri, Niambi Carter—Howard University St. Louis Cathy Cohen—University of Chicago Byron D’Andra Orey—Jackson State University Dewey Clayton—University of Louisville Marion Orr—Brown University Nyron Crawford—Temple University Dianne Pinderhughes—University of Notre Dame Heath Fogg Davis—Temple University Matt Platt—Morehouse College Pearl Ford Dowe—University of Arkansas H.L.T. Quan—Arizona State University Kamille Gentles Peart—Roger Williams University Boris Ricks—California State University, Northridge Daniel Gillion—University of Pennsylvania Christina Rivers—DePaul University Ricky Green—California State University, Sacramento Neil Roberts—Williams College Jean-Germain Gros—University of Missouri, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 PARTY BEHAVIOR: THE RESPONSE OF AMERICAN POLITICAL PARTIES TO RACIAL, REUGIOUS AND ETHNIC GROUPS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfülnient of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Laurel Elizabeth Elder ***** The Ohio State University 1999 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Paul Beck, Adviser WUliam Nelson Herbert Weisberg Adviser Pohdcal Science Graduate Program Kira Sanbonmatsu DMI Number: 9941317 UMI Microform 9941317 Copyright 1999, by UMI Company.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Political Science Association Vol. LXXI March 1977
    V Articles and Essays by Richard K. Dagger, Peter J. Stein- berger, John H. Aldrich and Richard D. McKelvey, M. Kent Jennings and Gregory B. Markus, Bryan D. Jones, Saadia . Greenberg, Clifford Kaufman, and Joseph Drew, John A. Ferejohn, Morris P. Fiorina, James H. Quails, James David Barber, John V. Gillespie, Dina A. Zinnes, Philip A. Schrodt, G.S. Tahim, and R. Michael Rubison, Charles D. Cary, John M. Bacheller, David Adamany, Edward R. Tufte https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Paul E. Meehl The Selfish Voter Paradox and the Thrown-Away Vote Argument Michael Margolis From Confusion to Confusion Samuel Kernell Presidential Popularity and Negative Voting , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at Lowell Dittmer Thought Reform and Cultural Revolution 01 Oct 2021 at 13:02:51 , on James MacGregor Burns APS A Presidential Address: Wellsprings of Political Leadership 170.106.35.229 . IP address: Published Quarterly by The American Political Science Association Vol. LXXI March 1977 No. 1 https://www.cambridge.org/core f r't --% .-». t~+\ j https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540025925X Downloaded from up-to-the-minute . j By Kenneth Prewitt j & Sidney Verba • The Revised Second Edition of : AN INTRODUCTION TO https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms \ AMERICAN GOVERNMENT • The Second Edition of this widely used text has been revised in order to • incorporate political developments through the 1976 elections. Chapters 9, a 10, and 11, on political parties and elections, congress, and the presidency. • are completely rewritten to reflect campaign events and election results. • The remainder of the book will stand as published last February.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Task Force on Political Science in the 21St Century
    AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE AssOCIATION n TasK FORCE REPORT, OCTOBER 2011 Report of the Task Force on Political Science Political Science in the in the 21st Century 21st Century Political Science in the 21st Century Report of the Task Force on Political Science in the 21st Century OCTOBER 2011 AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE AssoCIATION 1527 New Hampshire Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036-1206 Copyright © 2011 by the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-1-878147-39-4 Task Force On Political Science for the 21st Century Task Force Members Luis Ricardo Fraga, University of Washington, Co-Chair Terri E. Givens, University of Texas at Austin, Co-Chair Dianne M. Pinderhughes, University of Notre Dame President, APSA, 2007-08 Manuel Avalos, University of North Carolina, Wilmington David Covin, California State University, Sacramento Frances Hagopian, University of Notre Dame Lisa García-Bedolla, University of California, Berkeley Juan Carlos Huerta, Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi Vincent L. Hutchings, University of Michigan Michael A. Jones-Correa, Cornell University Fae L. Korsmo, National Science Foundation, Federal Liaison Taeku Lee, University of California, Berkeley Mark Q. Sawyer, University of California, Los Angeles Sherri L. Wallace, University of Louisville ii APSA • Political Science in the 21st Century Acknowledgements This report could not have been completed without the generous assistance of a number of individuals. We are thankful to all Task Force members for their insights and guidance. We are especially grateful to the chairs of our working groups: Lisa García-Bedolla, Research; Juan Carlos Huerta and Sherri Wallace, Teaching and Pedagogy; and Manuel Avalos, Access and Inclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 18 National Political Science Review Challenging the Legacies of Racial Resentment
    THE NATIONAL POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW EDITORS Managing Editor Tiffany Willoughby-Herard University of California, Irvine Associate Managing Editor Julia Jordan-Zachery Providence College Duchess Harris Macalester College Sharon Wright Austin The University of Florida Angela K. Lewis University of Alabama, Birmingham BOOK REVIEW EDITOR Keisha Blain University of Iowa EDITORIAL BOARD Melina Abdullah - California State University, Keisha Lindsay - University of Wisconsin Los Angeles Clarence Lusane - American University Anthony Affigne - Providence College Maruice Mangum - Texas Southern University Nikol Alexander-Floyd - Rutgers University Lorenzo Morris - Howard University Russell Benjamin - Northeastern Illinois University Richard T. Middleton IV - University of Nadia Brown - Purdue University Missouri-St. Louis Niambi Carter - Howard University Byron D’Andra Orey - Jackson State University Cathy Cohen - University of Chicago Marion Orr - Brown University Dewey Clayton - University of Louisville Dianne Pinderhughes - University of Notre Dame Nyron Crawford - Temple University Matt Platt - Morehouse College Heath Fogg-Davis - Temple University H.L.T. Quan - Arizona State University Pearl Ford Dowe - University of Arkansas Boris Ricks - California State University, Northridge Kamille Gentles Peart - Roger Williams University Christina Rivers - DePaul University Daniel Gillion - University of Pennsylvania Neil Roberts - Williams College Ricky Green - California State University, Sacramento Fatemeh Shafiei - Spelman College Jean-German Gros
    [Show full text]
  • Social Protest Movements: What Sociology Can
    Association News PS, Vol. 18, No. 4. (Autumn, 1985), pp. 797-832+834-838+840-848. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0030-8269%28198523%2918%3A4%3C797%3AAN%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Z PS is currently published by American Political Science Association. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/apsa.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org Wed Feb 13 10:12:46 2008 Association News Reports on the Annual Meeting Annual Meeting TABLE 2 In New Orleans 1985 Annual Meeting APSA Organized Section Panels Well Attended Number A total of 2,842 people attended APSA's Section of Panels annual meeting in New Orleans, August 29-September 1, despite a hurricane Conflict Processes threat and a few cancelled airplane Federalism and Intergovern- flights.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Political Science Association ^ J Vol. LXVIII June 1974 No. 2
    •^ Articles and Essays by Peter Eisinger, Ada W. Finifter, ^Γ John C. Pierce and Douglas D. Rose, Philip E. Converse, Arthur G. Stevens, Jr., Arthur H. Miller, and Thomas E. Mann, David J. Elkins, Donald R. Kelley, John Chamberlin, as William I. Bacchus Ronald P. Formisano, Roger E. Wyman The Growth of U.S. Political Culture https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms >> — Kenneth A. Shepsle, Robert Lyle Butterworth, >^3 John A* *"«i*» and Morris P. Fiorina, Peter C. Fishburn "^ Formal Theories of Voting and Coalitions Glenn Tinder _ Transcending Tragedy: The Idea of Civility ****i Timothy A. Tilton ^γ*,* The Social Origins of Liberal Democracy: , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at K^ The Swedish Case ^ Stanley Kelley, Jr. and Thad W. Mirer S The Simple Act of Voting 02 Oct 2021 at 22:55:20 , on Published Quarterly by 170.106.202.8 The American Political Science Association . IP address: ^j Vol. LXVIII June 1974 No. 2 https://www.cambridge.org/core https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400117290 Downloaded from POLITICAL . SCIENCE CONGRESSMEN'S CHALLENGE AND VOTING DECISIONS DECISION: Political Issues John W. Kingdon of Our Time, Fourth Edition This analysis of the ways congressmen Reo M. Christenson arrive at*their voting decisions examines Lucid, concise, coherent, and well rounded, https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms the influence of various political actors, as the Fourth Edition of this text focuses on well as congressmen's decision rules, their the most crucial and controversial aspects sources of information, and their place in of current political issues. 227 pp.; Paper: the larger political system.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Conference Program
    MPSA Midwest Political Science Association 60th Annual National Conference April 25-28, 2002 Palmer House Hilton Chicago, Illinois Program Chairs President Richard Niemi Herbert Weisberg University of Rochester Ohio State University Elizabeth Theiss-Morse University of Nebraska Conference logo design by Soontira Sutanont Conference Program $10 MPSA Office, Indiana University, 210 Woodburn Hall, Bloomington, IN 47405 Phone 812-856-5621 Fax 812-856-7137 Email [email protected] 1 MPSA Midwest Political Science Association Officers and Executive Council President: Executive Council (term): Herbert Weisberg, Ohio State University (2002) Stephen Bennett, University of Cincinnati President-elect: Vicki Hesli, University of Iowa Lee Epstein, Washington University Brian Silver, Michigan State University Joan Tronto, Hunter College Vice Presidents: Jack Wright, Ohio State University Bryan Jones, University of Washington Edward Carmines, Indiana University (2003) Elisabeth Gerber, University of Michigan Executive Director: William Jacoby, University of South Carolina William D. Morgan, Indiana University Carol Kohfeld, University of Missouri, St. Louis Gary Michael Segura, University of Iowa Editor, AJPS: Randolph Siverson, University of California, Davis Kim Quail Hill, Texas A&M University Jan Leighley, Texas A&M University (2004): David Canon, University of Wisconsin Program Chairs, 2002: Jeff Cohen, Fordham University Richard Niemi, University of Rochester Kathy Dolan, University of Wisconsin, Elizabeth Theiss-Morse, University of Milwaukee Nebraska Diana Mutz, Ohio State University Barbara Norrander, University of Arizona Past President: Robert Huckfeldt, Indiana University MPSA Past Presidents James K. Pollock Wilford E. Binkley Leon D. Epstein Ada Finifter W.H.C. Laves Clarence A. Berdahl Doris A. Graber John Kingdon Francis G. Wilson Jasper B. Shannon Frank Sorauf William Crotty John E.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power Free
    FREE EXPLAINING INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE: AMBIGUITY, AGENCY, AND POWER PDF James Mahoney,Kathleen Thelen | 254 pages | 18 May 2010 | CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS | 9780521134323 | English | Cambridge, United Kingdom A Gradual Theory of Institutional Change — Northwestern Scholars Tente novamente Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity tarde. Adicionar coautores Coautores. Carregar PDF. PDF Restaurar Eliminar Agency. Seguir este autor. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity artigos deste autor. Novos artigos relacionados Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity a pesquisa deste autor. Coautores Dietrich Rueschemeyer Email confirmado em brown. Tulia Falleti University of Pennsylvania Email confirmado em sas. Colin Elman Syracuse University Email confirmado em syr. Jennifer Cyr University of Arizona Email confirmado em email. Artigos Citado por Coautores. Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and Agency 1, Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences, Studies in comparative international development 36 1, Comparative political studies 40 2, Artigos 1—20 Mostrar mais. Ajuda Privacidade Termos. Path and Power in historical sociology J Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity Theory and society 29 4, A theory of gradual institutional change J Mahoney, K Thelen Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power 1, A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research J Mahoney, G Goertz Political analysis, Aligning ontology and
    [Show full text]