DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 16 Outline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 16 Outline CHAPTER 16 Microbial Life: Prokaryotes and Protists Chapter Objectives Prokaryotes 16.1 Describe the diversity, abundance, and importance of prokaryotic life. 16.2 Compare the different shapes, cell walls, and projections of prokaryotes. 16.3 Explain how bacteria can evolve quickly and how bacteria can survive stressful environments. 16.4 Describe the types of nutritional diversity found in prokaryotes. 16.5 Explain why biofilms are unique and potentially dangerous to human health. 16.6 Explain how prokaryotes are employed to address the needs of human society. 16.7 Compare the three domains of life based on differences in cellular and biochemical traits. 16.8 Describe the diverse types of Archaea living in extreme and more moderate environments. 16.9 Distinguish between the five subgroups of the domain Bacteria, noting the particular structure, special features, and habitats of each group. 16.10 Describe some of the diseases associated with bacteria. Distinguish between exotoxins and en- dotoxins, noting examples of each. 16.11 Describe the four parts of Koch’s postulates. Explain how Marshall was able to demonstrate that the bacterium Helicobacter pylori can cause gastritis. Protists 16.12 Describe the basic types of protists. Explain why biologists currently think that they represent many clades. 16.13 Explain how primary endosymbiosis and secondary endosymbiosis led to further cellular diversity. 16.14 Describe and compare the groups that together form the supergroup SAR. 16.15 Explain how cultured algae may be used as renewable fuels and the current challenges that re- main. 16.16–16.18 Describe and distinguish between the Excavata, Unikonta, and Archaeplastida groups. 16.18 Describe the life cycle of Ulva, noting each form in the alternation of generations and how each is produced. 16.19 Describe the protist ancestors of animals, plants, and fungi. Explain how each ancestral protist group is similar to its most likely descendants. Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 Outline I. Introduction 1. Microorganisms residing in and on your body outnumber your own cells 10 to 1—100 trillion bacteria, archaea, and protists call your body home. 2. Scientists hypothesize that disrupting our microbial communities may a. increase diseases, b. predispose us to certain cancers, and c. contribute to conditions such as asthma and other allergies, irritable bowel syndrome, Crohn’s disease, and autism. II. Prokaryotes A. 16.1 Prokaryotes are diverse and widespread 1. Prokaryotic cells are smaller than eukaryotic cells. a. Prokaryotes range from 1 to 5 µm in diameter. b. Eukaryotes range from 10 to 100 µm in diameter. 2. The collective biomass of prokaryotes is at least 10 times that of all eukaryotes. 3. Prokaryotes live in habitats a. too cold, b. too hot, c. too salty, d. too acidic, and e. too alkaline for eukaryotes to survive. 4. Some bacteria are pathogens causing disease. 5. But most bacteria on our bodies are benign or beneficial. 6. Our microbiota consists of the community of microorganisms that live in and on our bodies. 7. Each of us harbors several hundred different species and genetic strains of prokaryotes, including a few positive effects that are well studied. a. Some intestinal bacteria supply essential vitamins and enable us to extract nutrition from food mole- cules that we can’t otherwise digest. b. Many of the bacteria that live on our skin perform helpful housekeeping functions such as decom- posing dead skin cells. c. Other prokaryotes guard against pathogenic intruders. 8. Prokaryotes in soil help to decompose dead organisms and other organic waste material, which return vital chemical elements to the environment. 9. If prokaryotes were to disappear, a. the chemical cycles that sustain life would halt and b. all forms of eukaryotic life would be doomed. 10. There are two very different kinds of prokaryotes, which are classified in different domains. a. Archaea b. Bacteria B. 16.2 External features contribute to the success of prokaryotes 1. Prokaryotic cells have three common cell shapes. a. Cocci are spherical prokaryotic cells. They sometimes occur in chains that are called streptococci. b. Bacilli are rod-shaped prokaryotes. Bacilli may also be threadlike, or filamentous. c. Spiral prokaryotes are like a corkscrew. i. Short and rigid prokaryotes are called spirilla. ii. Longer, more flexible cells are called spirochetes. 2 Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 2. Nearly all prokaryotes have a cell wall. Cell walls a. provide physical protection and b. prevent the cell from bursting in a hypotonic environment. 3. When stained with Gram stain, cell walls of bacteria are either a. gram-positive, with simpler cell walls containing peptidoglycan, or b. gram-negative, with less peptidoglycan. These bacteria are more complex and more likely to cause disease. 4. The cell wall of many prokaryotes is covered by a capsule, a sticky layer of polysaccharides or protein. 5. The capsule a. enables prokaryotes to adhere to their substrate or to other individuals in a colony and b. shields pathogenic prokaryotes from attacks by a host’s immune system. 6. Some prokaryotes have external structures that extend beyond the cell wall. a. Flagella are adaptations that enable them to move about in response to chemical or physical signals in their environment. b. Hairlike projections called fimbriae enable prokaryotes i. to stick to a surface or each other or ii. latch onto the host cells they colonize. C. 16.3 Populations of prokaryotes can adapt rapidly to changes in the environment 1. Prokaryote population growth a. occurs by binary fission, b. can rapidly produce a new generation within hours, and c. can generate a great deal of genetic variation by spontaneous mutations, increasing the likelihood that some members of the population will survive changes in the environment. 2. The genome of a prokaryote typically a. has about one-thousandth as much DNA as a eukaryotic genome and b. is one long, circular chromosome packed into a distinct region of the cell. 3. Many prokaryotes also have additional small, circular DNA molecules called plasmids, which replicate independently of the chromosome. 4. Some prokaryotes form specialized cells called endospores that remain dormant through harsh condi- tions. 5. Endospores can survive extreme heat or cold. 6. When the endospore receives environmental cues that conditions have improved, it a. absorbs water and b. resumes growth. D. 16.4 Prokaryotes have unparalleled nutritional diversity 1. Prokaryotes exhibit much more nutritional diversity than eukaryotes, allowing them to inhabit almost every nook and cranny on Earth. 2. Two sources of energy are used. a. Phototrophs capture energy from sunlight. b. Chemotrophs harness the energy stored in chemicals. Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. CHAPTER 16 Microbial Life: Prokaryotes and Protists 3 3. Two sources of carbon are used by prokaryotes. a. Autotrophs obtain carbon atoms from carbon dioxide. b. Heterotrophs obtain their carbon atoms from the organic compounds present in other organisms. 4. The terms that describe how prokaryotes obtain energy and carbon are combined to describe their modes of nutrition. a. Photoautotrophs obtain energy from sunlight and use CO2 for carbon. b. Photoheterotrophs obtain energy from sunlight but get their carbon atoms from organic sources. c. Chemoautotrophs harvest energy from inorganic chemicals and use carbon from CO2 to make or- ganic molecules. d. Chemoheterotrophs acquire energy and carbon from organic molecules. E. 16.5 CONNECTION: Biofilms are complex associations of microbes 1. Biofilms are highly organized colonies that attach to surfaces. 2. Biofilms consist of one or several species of prokaryotes and may also include protists and fungi. 3. Biofilms can form on most any support, including rocks, soil, organic material, or the surface of stag- nant water. 4. Biofilm formation begins when prokaryotes secrete signaling molecules that attract nearby cells into a cluster. 5. Once the cluster becomes sufficiently large, the cells produce a gooey coating that glues them to the support and to each other, making the biofilm extremely difficult to dislodge. 6. Biofilms a. communicate by chemical signals, b. coordinate a division of labor, and c. collectively defend against invaders. 7. Channels in the biofilm allow a. nutrients to reach cells in the interior, b. wastes to leave, and c. a variety of environments to develop within it. F. 16.6 CONNECTION: Prokaryotes help clean up the environment 1. Prokaryotes are useful for cleaning up contaminants in the environment because prokaryotes a. have great nutritional diversity, b. are quickly adaptable, and c. can form biofilms. 2. Bioremediation is the use of organisms to remove pollutants from a. soil, b. air, or c. water. 3. Prokaryotic decomposers are the mainstays of sewage treatment facilities. a. Raw sewage is first passed through a series of screens and shredders. b. Solid matter then settles out from the liquid waste, forming sludge. c. Sludge is gradually added to a culture of anaerobic prokaryotes, including bacteria and archaea. d. The microbes decompose the organic matter into material that can be placed in a landfill or used as fertilizer. 4. Liquid wastes are treated separately from the sludge. a. Liquid wastes are sprayed onto a thick bed of rocks. b. Biofilms of aerobic bacteria and fungi growing on the rocks remove much of the dissolved organic material. c. Fluid draining from the rocks is sterilized and then released, usually into a river or ocean. 4 Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 5. Bioremediation is becoming a useful tool for cleaning up toxic chemicals released into the soil and wa- ter. 6. Environmental workers may change the natural environment to accelerate the activity of naturally oc- curring prokaryotes capable of metabolizing pollutants. G. 16.7 Bacteria and Archaea are the two main branches of prokaryotic evolution 1. New studies of representative genomes of prokaryotes and eukaryotes strongly support the three-do- main view of life.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Basal Body Structure and Composition in the Apicomplexans Toxoplasma and Plasmodium Maria E
    Francia et al. Cilia (2016) 5:3 DOI 10.1186/s13630-016-0025-5 Cilia REVIEW Open Access Basal body structure and composition in the apicomplexans Toxoplasma and Plasmodium Maria E. Francia1* , Jean‑Francois Dubremetz2 and Naomi S. Morrissette3 Abstract The phylum Apicomplexa encompasses numerous important human and animal disease-causing parasites, includ‑ ing the Plasmodium species, and Toxoplasma gondii, causative agents of malaria and toxoplasmosis, respectively. Apicomplexans proliferate by asexual replication and can also undergo sexual recombination. Most life cycle stages of the parasite lack flagella; these structures only appear on male gametes. Although male gametes (microgametes) assemble a typical 9 2 axoneme, the structure of the templating basal body is poorly defined. Moreover, the rela‑ tionship between asexual+ stage centrioles and microgamete basal bodies remains unclear. While asexual stages of Plasmodium lack defined centriole structures, the asexual stages of Toxoplasma and closely related coccidian api‑ complexans contain centrioles that consist of nine singlet microtubules and a central tubule. There are relatively few ultra-structural images of Toxoplasma microgametes, which only develop in cat intestinal epithelium. Only a subset of these include sections through the basal body: to date, none have unambiguously captured organization of the basal body structure. Moreover, it is unclear whether this basal body is derived from pre-existing asexual stage centrioles or is synthesized de novo. Basal bodies in Plasmodium microgametes are thought to be synthesized de novo, and their assembly remains ill-defined. Apicomplexan genomes harbor genes encoding δ- and ε-tubulin homologs, potentially enabling these parasites to assemble a typical triplet basal body structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Data and the Evolutionary History of Dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Un
    Molecular data and the evolutionary history of dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg, 1993 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Botany We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA November 2003 © Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria, 2003 ABSTRACT New sequences of ribosomal and protein genes were combined with available morphological and paleontological data to produce a phylogenetic framework for dinoflagellates. The evolutionary history of some of the major morphological features of the group was then investigated in the light of that framework. Phylogenetic trees of dinoflagellates based on the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU) are generally poorly resolved but include many well- supported clades, and while combined analyses of SSU and LSU (large subunit ribosomal RNA) improve the support for several nodes, they are still generally unsatisfactory. Protein-gene based trees lack the degree of species representation necessary for meaningful in-group phylogenetic analyses, but do provide important insights to the phylogenetic position of dinoflagellates as a whole and on the identity of their close relatives. Molecular data agree with paleontology in suggesting an early evolutionary radiation of the group, but whereas paleontological data include only taxa with fossilizable cysts, the new data examined here establish that this radiation event included all dinokaryotic lineages, including athecate forms. Plastids were lost and replaced many times in dinoflagellates, a situation entirely unique for this group. Histones could well have been lost earlier in the lineage than previously assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • Eukaryotic Microorganisms Algae and Protozoans 2
    Eukaryotic Microorganisms Algae and Protozoans 2 Eukaryotic Microorganisms . prominent members of ecosystems . useful as model systems and industry . some are major human pathogens . two groups . protists . fungi 3 Kingdom Protista . Algae - eukaryotic organisms, usually unicellular and colonial, that photosynthesize with chlorophyll a . Protozoa - unicellular eukaryotes that lack tissues and share similarities in cell structure, nutrition, life cycle, and biochemistry 4 Algae .Photosynthetic organisms .Microscopic forms are unicellular, colonial, filamentous .Macroscopic forms are colonial and multicellular .Contain chloroplasts with chlorophyll and other pigments .Cell wall .May or may not have flagella 5 6 Algae .Most are free-living in fresh and marine water – plankton .Provide basis of food web in most aquatic habitats .Produce large proportion of atmospheric O2 .Dinoflagellates can cause red tides and give off toxins that cause food poisoning with neurological symptoms .Classified according to types of pigments and cell wall .Used for cosmetics, food, and medical products 7 Protozoa Protozoa 9 .Diverse group of 65,000 species .Vary in shape, lack a cell wall .Most are unicellular; colonies are rare .Most are harmless, free-living in a moist habitat .Some are animal parasites and can be spread by insect vectors .All are heterotrophic – lack chloroplasts .Cytoplasm divided into ectoplasm and endoplasm .Feed by engulfing other microbes and organic matter Protozoa 10 .Most have locomotor structures – flagella, cilia, or pseudopods .Exist as trophozoite – motile feeding stage .Many can enter into a dormant resting stage when conditions are unfavorable for growth and feeding – cyst .All reproduce asexually, mitosis or multiple fission; many also reproduce sexually – conjugation Figure 5.27 11 Protozoan Identification 12 .
    [Show full text]
  • The Planktonic Protist Interactome: Where Do We Stand After a Century of Research?
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/587352; this version posted May 2, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Bjorbækmo et al., 23.03.2019 – preprint copy - BioRxiv The planktonic protist interactome: where do we stand after a century of research? Marit F. Markussen Bjorbækmo1*, Andreas Evenstad1* and Line Lieblein Røsæg1*, Anders K. Krabberød1**, and Ramiro Logares2,1** 1 University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (Evogene), Blindernv. 31, N- 0316 Oslo, Norway 2 Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37-49, ES-08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain * The three authors contributed equally ** Corresponding authors: Ramiro Logares: Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM-CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. Phone: 34-93-2309500; Fax: 34-93-2309555. [email protected] Anders K. Krabberød: University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (Evogene), Blindernv. 31, N-0316 Oslo, Norway. Phone +47 22845986, Fax: +47 22854726. [email protected] Abstract Microbial interactions are crucial for Earth ecosystem function, yet our knowledge about them is limited and has so far mainly existed as scattered records. Here, we have surveyed the literature involving planktonic protist interactions and gathered the information in a manually curated Protist Interaction DAtabase (PIDA). In total, we have registered ~2,500 ecological interactions from ~500 publications, spanning the last 150 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaits in Paramecium Escape
    Transitions between three swimming gaits in Paramecium escape Amandine Hamela, Cathy Fischb, Laurent Combettesc,d, Pascale Dupuis-Williamsb,e, and Charles N. Barouda,1 aLadHyX and Department of Mechanics, Ecole Polytechnique, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 91128 Palaiseau cedex, France; bActions Thématiques Incitatives de Genopole® Centriole and Associated Pathologies, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité-Université d’Evry-Val-d’Essonne Unité U829, Université Evry-Val d'Essonne, Bâtiment Maupertuis, Rue du Père André Jarlan, 91025 Evry, France; cInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité UMRS-757, Bâtiment 443, 91405 Orsay, France; dSignalisation Calcique et Interactions Cellulaires dans le Foie, Université de Paris-Sud, Bâtiment 443, 91405 Orsay, France; and eEcole Supérieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles ParisTech, 10 rue Vauquelin, 75005 Paris, France Edited* by Harry L. Swinney, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, and approved March 8, 2011 (received for review November 10, 2010) Paramecium and other protists are able to swim at velocities reach- or in the switching between the different swimming behaviors ing several times their body size per second by beating their cilia (11, 13–17). in an organized fashion. The cilia beat in an asymmetric stroke, Below we show that Paramecium may also use an alternative to which breaks the time reversal symmetry of small scale flows. Here cilia to propel itself away from danger, which is based on tricho- we show that Paramecium uses three different swimming gaits to cyst extrusion. Trichocysts are exocytotic organelles, which are escape from an aggression, applied in the form of a focused laser regularly distributed along the plasma membrane in Paramecium heating.
    [Show full text]
  • Peridinin-Containing Dinoflagellates Are Eukaryotic Protozoans, Which
    Investigation of Dinoflagellate Plastid Protein Transport using Heterologous and Homologous in vivo Systems Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) Vorgelegt dem Fachbereich Biologie der Philipps-Universität Marburg von Andrew Scott Bozarth aus Columbia, Maryland, USA Marburg/Lahn 2010 Vom Fachbereich Biologie der Philipps-Universität als Dissertation angenommen am 26.07.2010 angenommen. Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Uwe-G. Maier Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Klaus Lingelbach Prof. Dr. Andreas Brune Prof. Dr. Renate Renkawitz-Pohl Tag der Disputation am: 11.10.2010 Results! Why, man, I have gotten a lot of results. I know several thousand things that won’t work! -Thomas A. Edison Publications Bozarth A, Susanne Lieske, Christine Weber, Sven Gould, and Stefan Zauner (2010) Transfection with Dinoflagellate Transit Peptides (in progress). Bolte K, Bullmann L, Hempel F, Bozarth A, Zauner S, Maier UG (2009) Protein Targeting into Secondary Plastids. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 56, 9–15. Bozarth A, Maier UG, Zauner S (2009) Diatoms in biotechnology: modern tools and applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 82, 195-201. Maier UG, Bozarth A, Funk HT, Zauner S, Rensing SA, Schmitz-Linneweber C, Börner T, Tillich M (2008) Complex chloroplast RNA metabolism: just debugging the genetic programme? BMC Biol. 6, 36. Hempel F, Bozarth A, Sommer MS, Zauner S, Przyborski JM, Maier UG. (2007) Transport of nuclear-encoded proteins into secondarily evolved plastids. Biol Chem. 388, 899-906. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Burmese Amber Taxa
    Burmese (Myanmar) amber taxa, on-line supplement v.2021.1 Andrew J. Ross 21/06/2021 Principal Curator of Palaeobiology Department of Natural Sciences National Museums Scotland Chambers St. Edinburgh EH1 1JF E-mail: [email protected] Dr Andrew Ross | National Museums Scotland (nms.ac.uk) This taxonomic list is a supplement to Ross (2021) and follows the same format. It includes taxa described or recorded from the beginning of January 2021 up to the end of May 2021, plus 3 species that were named in 2020 which were missed. Please note that only higher taxa that include new taxa or changed/corrected records are listed below. The list is until the end of May, however some papers published in June are listed in the ‘in press’ section at the end, but taxa from these are not yet included in the checklist. As per the previous on-line checklists, in the bibliography page numbers have been added (in blue) to those papers that were published on-line previously without page numbers. New additions or changes to the previously published list and supplements are marked in blue, corrections are marked in red. In Ross (2021) new species of spider from Wunderlich & Müller (2020) were listed as being authored by both authors because there was no indication next to the new name to indicate otherwise, however in the introduction it was indicated that the author of the new taxa was Wunderlich only. Where there have been subsequent taxonomic changes to any of these species the authorship has been corrected below.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intestinal Protozoa
    The Intestinal Protozoa A. Introduction 1. The Phylum Protozoa is classified into four major subdivisions according to the methods of locomotion and reproduction. a. The amoebae (Superclass Sarcodina, Class Rhizopodea move by means of pseudopodia and reproduce exclusively by asexual binary division. b. The flagellates (Superclass Mastigophora, Class Zoomasitgophorea) typically move by long, whiplike flagella and reproduce by binary fission. c. The ciliates (Subphylum Ciliophora, Class Ciliata) are propelled by rows of cilia that beat with a synchronized wavelike motion. d. The sporozoans (Subphylum Sporozoa) lack specialized organelles of motility but have a unique type of life cycle, alternating between sexual and asexual reproductive cycles (alternation of generations). e. Number of species - there are about 45,000 protozoan species; around 8000 are parasitic, and around 25 species are important to humans. 2. Diagnosis - must learn to differentiate between the harmless and the medically important. This is most often based upon the morphology of respective organisms. 3. Transmission - mostly person-to-person, via fecal-oral route; fecally contaminated food or water important (organisms remain viable for around 30 days in cool moist environment with few bacteria; other means of transmission include sexual, insects, animals (zoonoses). B. Structures 1. trophozoite - the motile vegetative stage; multiplies via binary fission; colonizes host. 2. cyst - the inactive, non-motile, infective stage; survives the environment due to the presence of a cyst wall. 3. nuclear structure - important in the identification of organisms and species differentiation. 4. diagnostic features a. size - helpful in identifying organisms; must have calibrated objectives on the microscope in order to measure accurately.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phagotrophic Origin of Eukaryotes and Phylogenetic Classification Of
    International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (2002), 52, 297–354 DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.02058-0 The phagotrophic origin of eukaryotes and phylogenetic classification of Protozoa Department of Zoology, T. Cavalier-Smith University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK Tel: j44 1865 281065. Fax: j44 1865 281310. e-mail: tom.cavalier-smith!zoo.ox.ac.uk Eukaryotes and archaebacteria form the clade neomura and are sisters, as shown decisively by genes fragmented only in archaebacteria and by many sequence trees. This sisterhood refutes all theories that eukaryotes originated by merging an archaebacterium and an α-proteobacterium, which also fail to account for numerous features shared specifically by eukaryotes and actinobacteria. I revise the phagotrophy theory of eukaryote origins by arguing that the essentially autogenous origins of most eukaryotic cell properties (phagotrophy, endomembrane system including peroxisomes, cytoskeleton, nucleus, mitosis and sex) partially overlapped and were synergistic with the symbiogenetic origin of mitochondria from an α-proteobacterium. These radical innovations occurred in a derivative of the neomuran common ancestor, which itself had evolved immediately prior to the divergence of eukaryotes and archaebacteria by drastic alterations to its eubacterial ancestor, an actinobacterial posibacterium able to make sterols, by replacing murein peptidoglycan by N-linked glycoproteins and a multitude of other shared neomuran novelties. The conversion of the rigid neomuran wall into a flexible surface coat and the associated origin of phagotrophy were instrumental in the evolution of the endomembrane system, cytoskeleton, nuclear organization and division and sexual life-cycles. Cilia evolved not by symbiogenesis but by autogenous specialization of the cytoskeleton.
    [Show full text]
  • Protist Phylogeny and the High-Level Classification of Protozoa
    Europ. J. Protistol. 39, 338–348 (2003) © Urban & Fischer Verlag http://www.urbanfischer.de/journals/ejp Protist phylogeny and the high-level classification of Protozoa Thomas Cavalier-Smith Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK; E-mail: [email protected] Received 1 September 2003; 29 September 2003. Accepted: 29 September 2003 Protist large-scale phylogeny is briefly reviewed and a revised higher classification of the kingdom Pro- tozoa into 11 phyla presented. Complementary gene fusions reveal a fundamental bifurcation among eu- karyotes between two major clades: the ancestrally uniciliate (often unicentriolar) unikonts and the an- cestrally biciliate bikonts, which undergo ciliary transformation by converting a younger anterior cilium into a dissimilar older posterior cilium. Unikonts comprise the ancestrally unikont protozoan phylum Amoebozoa and the opisthokonts (kingdom Animalia, phylum Choanozoa, their sisters or ancestors; and kingdom Fungi). They share a derived triple-gene fusion, absent from bikonts. Bikonts contrastingly share a derived gene fusion between dihydrofolate reductase and thymidylate synthase and include plants and all other protists, comprising the protozoan infrakingdoms Rhizaria [phyla Cercozoa and Re- taria (Radiozoa, Foraminifera)] and Excavata (phyla Loukozoa, Metamonada, Euglenozoa, Percolozoa), plus the kingdom Plantae [Viridaeplantae, Rhodophyta (sisters); Glaucophyta], the chromalveolate clade, and the protozoan phylum Apusozoa (Thecomonadea, Diphylleida). Chromalveolates comprise kingdom Chromista (Cryptista, Heterokonta, Haptophyta) and the protozoan infrakingdom Alveolata [phyla Cilio- phora and Miozoa (= Protalveolata, Dinozoa, Apicomplexa)], which diverged from a common ancestor that enslaved a red alga and evolved novel plastid protein-targeting machinery via the host rough ER and the enslaved algal plasma membrane (periplastid membrane).
    [Show full text]
  • CH28 PROTISTS.Pptx
    9/29/14 Biosc 41 Announcements 9/29 Review: History of Life v Quick review followed by lecture quiz (history & v How long ago is Earth thought to have formed? phylogeny) v What is thought to have been the first genetic material? v Lecture: Protists v Are we tetrapods? v Lab: Protozoa (animal-like protists) v Most atmospheric oxygen comes from photosynthesis v Lab exam 1 is Wed! (does not cover today’s lab) § Since many of the first organisms were photosynthetic (i.e. cyanobacteria), a LOT of excess oxygen accumulated (O2 revolution) § Some organisms adapted to use it (aerobic respiration) Review: History of Life Review: Phylogeny v Which organelles are thought to have originated as v Homology is similarity due to shared ancestry endosymbionts? v Analogy is similarity due to convergent evolution v During what event did fossils resembling modern taxa suddenly appear en masse? v A valid clade is monophyletic, meaning it consists of the ancestor taxon and all its descendants v How many mass extinctions seem to have occurred during v A paraphyletic grouping consists of an ancestral species and Earth’s history? Describe one? some, but not all, of the descendants v When is adaptive radiation likely to occur? v A polyphyletic grouping includes distantly related species but does not include their most recent common ancestor v Maximum parsimony assumes the tree requiring the fewest evolutionary events is most likely Quiz 3 (History and Phylogeny) BIOSC 041 1. How long ago is Earth thought to have formed? 2. Why might many organisms have evolved to use aerobic respiration? PROTISTS! Reference: Chapter 28 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromerid Genomes Reveal the Evolutionary Path From
    RESEARCH ARTICLE elifesciences.org Chromerid genomes reveal the evolutionary path from photosynthetic algae to obligate intracellular parasites Yong H Woo1*, Hifzur Ansari1,ThomasDOtto2, Christen M Klinger3†, Martin Kolisko4†, Jan Michalek´ 5,6†, Alka Saxena1†‡, Dhanasekaran Shanmugam7†, Annageldi Tayyrov1†, Alaguraj Veluchamy8†§, Shahjahan Ali9¶,AxelBernal10,JavierdelCampo4, Jaromır´ Cihla´ rˇ5,6, Pavel Flegontov5,11, Sebastian G Gornik12,EvaHajduskovˇ a´ 5, AlesHorˇ ak´ 5,6,JanJanouskovecˇ 4, Nicholas J Katris12,FredDMast13,DiegoMiranda- Saavedra14,15, Tobias Mourier16, Raeece Naeem1,MridulNair1, Aswini K Panigrahi9, Neil D Rawlings17, Eriko Padron-Regalado1, Abhinay Ramaprasad1, Nadira Samad12, AlesTomˇ calaˇ 5,6, Jon Wilkes18,DanielENeafsey19, Christian Doerig20, Chris Bowler8, 4 10 3 21,22 *For correspondence: yong. Patrick J Keeling , David S Roos ,JoelBDacks, Thomas J Templeton , 12,23 5,6,24 5,6,25 1 [email protected] (YHW); arnab. Ross F Waller , Julius Lukesˇ , Miroslav Obornık´ ,ArnabPain* [email protected] (AP) 1Pathogen Genomics Laboratory, Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering † These authors contributed Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia; equally to this work 2Parasite Genomics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Present address: ‡Vaccine and Cambridge, United Kingdom; 3Department of Cell Biology, University of Alberta, Infectious Disease Division, Fred Edmonton, Canada; 4Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Department of Botany,
    [Show full text]