DOCSLIB.ORG

Cape Lambert Port B Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cape Lambert Port B Development Cape Lambert Port B Development ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING DOCUMENT 26 June 2008 Cape Lambert Port B Development ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING DOCUMENT 26 June 2008 Sinclair Knight Merz 7th Floor, Durack Centre 263 Adelaide Terrace PO Box H615 Perth WA 6001 Australia Tel: +61 8 9268 4400 Fax: +61 8 9268 4488 Web: www.skmconsulting.com LIMITATION: This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd’s Client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between Sinclair Knight Merz and its Client. Sinclair Knight Merz accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. The SKM logo is a trade mark of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd. © Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd, 2006 Cape Lambert Port B Development Environmental Scoping Document Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Purpose of Environmental Scoping Document 1 1.3 Identification of Proponent 2 1.4 Existing Facilities 3 1.5 Project Justification and local context 3 1.6 Early Works 4 2. Summary of Proposal 5 2.1 Proposal Outline 5 2.2 Approvals Strategy 5 2.3 Key Project Characteristics 5 2.4 Stockyard Management 6 2.5 Ore Delivery Systems 6 2.6 Wharf Works 6 2.7 Dredging Program 7 2.8 Services and Utilities 7 2.8.1 Support and Infrastructure Facilities 7 2.8.2 Water Supply 7 2.9 Alternatives Considered 8 3. Applicable Legislation 9 3.1 Western Australian Legislation 9 3.2 Commonwealth Legislation 9 4. Regional Setting 10 4.1 Climate 10 4.2 Geology and Soil 10 4.3 Physiographic Context 10 4.3.1 Landforms 10 4.3.2 Land systems 11 4.4 Marine Environment 11 4.5 Hydrology 13 4.6 Hydrogeology 13 4.7 Biological Context 13 4.7.1 Flora and Vegetation 13 4.7.2 Fauna 15 4.8 Land Tenure 17 4.9 Surrounding Land Uses 17 4.10 Heritage 18 4.10.1 Aboriginal Heritage 18 4.10.2 European Heritage 18 SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ PAGE i Cape Lambert Port B Development Environmental Scoping Document 5. Environmental Issues and Management 19 5.1 Principles of Environmental Protection 19 5.2 Environmental Management 20 6. Scope of Work for Public Environmental Review 25 6.1 Air Quality (Dust) 25 6.1.1 Purpose 25 6.1.2 Scope 25 6.2 Noise 25 6.2.1 Purpose 25 6.2.2 Scope 26 6.3 Light Spill 26 6.3.1 Purpose 26 6.3.2 Scope 26 6.4 Climate Change 27 6.4.1 Purpose 27 6.5 Vegetation and Flora 27 6.5.1 Purpose 27 6.5.2 Scope 27 6.6 Fauna 28 6.6.1 Sea Turtles 28 6.6.2 Terrestrial 29 6.7 Dredging and Spoil Disposal Studies 30 6.7.1 Purpose 30 6.7.2 Scope 30 6.8 Marine Water Quality 35 6.8.1 Purpose 35 6.8.2 Scope 35 6.9 Stormwater Management 35 6.9.1 Purpose 35 6.9.2 Scope 36 6.10 Water Resources 36 6.10.1 Purpose 36 6.10.2 Scope 36 6.11 Aboriginal Heritage 36 6.11.1 Purpose 36 6.11.2 Scope 36 6.12 Visual Amenity/Landscape 37 6.12.1 Purpose 37 6.12.2 Scope 37 6.13 Soils and Landforms 38 6.13.1 Purpose 38 6.13.2 Scope 38 6.14 Traffic 38 6.14.1 Purpose 38 SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ PAGEii Cape Lambert Port B Development Environmental Scoping Document 6.14.2 Scope 38 6.15 Minor Environmental Factors 39 6.16 Preparation of the PER 39 6.17 Environmental Offsets 39 7. Stakeholder Consultation 40 7.1 Consultation to Date 40 7.2 Ongoing Consultation 41 8. Project and Assessment Schedule 43 9. Study Team and Peer Review 44 9.1 Study Team 44 9.2 Peer Review 44 References 45 Figures 49 Appendix A Review of Data Requirements and Availability for Dredge Modelling 58 SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ PAGE iii Cape Lambert Port B Development Environmental Scoping Document List of Tables Table 1 Preliminary Key Project Characteristics 6 Table 2 Threatened and Priority Fauna Occurring within 50 km of Cape Lambert 16 Table 3 Marine Turtles in the Cape Lambert Region 17 Table 4 Principles of Environmental Protection 19 Table 5 Key Environmental Factors and Principles for Assessment 23 Table 6 Framework Environmental Management Plan Format 25 Table 7 Key Issues Raised by Stakeholders to Date 40 Table 8 Indicative Project and Assessment Schedule 43 Table 9 Key Study Personnel 44 List of Figures Figure 1 Location of Cape Lambert Facilities 51 Figure 2 Preliminary Cape Lambert Port B Development Layout Arrangement 53 Figure 3 Marine Environment in the Cape Lambert Study Area 55 Figure 4 Known Turtle Nesting Beaches in the Study Area 57 SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ PAGEiv Cape Lambert Port B Development Environmental Scoping Document 1. Introduction 1.1 Background Pilbara Iron operates the port operations at Cape Lambert, on behalf of Robe River Iron Associates (Robe River). The Cape Lambert port operations are located north-west of Point Samson (Figure 1). The Cape Lambert port facility was constructed in 1972 and currently has a capacity of around 60 million tonnes per annum (Mtpa). The operation has undergone various upgrades to meet increasing customer demand, with the current approved throughput capacity at 85 Mtpa 1. The operations consist of an iron ore handling, processing and ship loading facility. With the rise for global demand in iron ore predicted to continue, Pilbara Iron is proposing to construct a second ore handling, processing and ship loading facility at Cape Lambert. The proposed capacity of this development is approximately 100 Mtpa (but may be up to 130 Mtpa). The exact capacity of the development will be determined during the Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS). The Cape Lambert Port B development (referred to hereafter as the Port B development) is currently in the PFS stage, which will extend until Quarter 4 2008. Depending on the findings of the PFS and Rio Tinto commitment to progress into a more detailed study, a Feasibility Study (FS) will continue through to mid 2009. The increase in throughput capacity will be achieved through development of the new terminal at Cape Lambert and will involve both nearshore and onshore works, as shown in Figure 2. The Port B development is effectively a brown-field extension to the existing Cape Lambert operation. Nearshore works include dredging, construction of an approach jetty and a wharf with berthing pockets to accommodate up to four vessels at a time. Onshore works will include construction of new car dumping, stacking, stockpiling, reclaiming, screening, sampling and ship loading facilities. Other new facilities will include railway modifications to service the stockyard, possibly some workshop/s, warehouse and offices, some new road construction and road re-alignments and associated necessary port infrastructure facilities. The Port B development workforce construction workforce is expected to peak at approximately 1850 personnel. 1.2 Purpose of Environmental Scoping Document The Port B development was referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) under Section 38 of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA) on 8 November 2007. The EPA proposed a Public Environmental Review (PER) with an eight week review period level of assessment. This decision was subject to a two week appeals period, during which time no appeals were received. 1 It should be noted that the actual Cape Lambert capacity following the current upgrade will be 80Mtpa, whereas the approved throughput capacity is 85Mtpa. This allows for possible future operational efficiencies to be achieved whilst remaining within the approved capacity. SINCLAIR KNIGHT MERZ PAGE 1 Cape Lambert Port B Development Environmental Scoping Document Assessment at the level of PER requires the proponent to prepare an Environmental Scoping Document. The purpose of this document is to provide a basis of understanding with the EPA regarding the scope of the assessment of the Port B development as well as providing an indicative timeline for the assessment. This document provides a summary of the potential environmental impacts, their significance and potential management responses, proposed scope of studies which will underpin the assessment of the environmental acceptability of the proposal, key legislation, stakeholder consultation programme, project and assessment schedule, study team and peer review mechanisms. This document has been prepared in accordance with the EPA’s Guide for proponents preparing Environmental Scoping Documents (EPA 2007a). The Port B development was also referred to the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (DEWHA) on 12 February 2008. The development was determined to be a controlled action under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwth) (EPBC Act). This Environmental Scoping Document and the PER will be prepared to meet the requirements of the EPBC Act, the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000 (Cwth) (EPBC Regulations) and the Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Act 1981 (Cwth). The controlling provisions, that is those matters deemed significant for this proposal, for the action under the EPBC Act include: Listed threatened species and communities (sections 18 & 18A) Listed migratory species (sections 20 & 20A) Commonwealth marine areas (section 23 & 24A) The proposed action was deemed likely to have a significant impact for the following reasons: Several species of turtles, dolphins, dugong and whales have been identified as likely to occur in the waters around Cape Lambert. Uncertainty around the proposed location of the new spoil ground and specific details relating to dredging and spoil disposal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • September Shire of Roebourne Local Planning Strategy Evidential Analysis Paper: (Major Industry Projects)
    September Shire of Roebourne Local Planning Strategy Evidential Analysis Paper: (Major Industry Projects) Shire of Roebourne – Economic Development Strategy Preliminary Paper Version Control Document History and Status Status Issued To Qty Date Reviewed Approved Draft MP 1 23/4/13 Report Details Name: Author: Client: Name of doc: Doc version: Project number: P85029 SM Shire of Shire of Roebourne Electronic Draft 85029 MPD Roebourne – Local Planning P1263 SM Strategy 3103 PS Disclaimer: If you are a party other than the Shire of Roebourne, MacroPlan Dimasi: owes you no duty (whether in contract or in tort or under statute or otherwise) with respect to or in connection with the attached report or any part thereof; and will have no liability to you for any loss or damage suffered or costs incurred by you or any other person arising out of or in connection with the provision to you of the attached report or any part thereof, however the loss or damage is caused, including, but not limited to, as a result of negligence. If you are a party other than the Shire of Roebourne and you choose to rely upon the attached report or any part thereof, you do so entirely at your own risk. The responsibility for determining the adequacy or otherwise of our terms of reference is that of the Shire of Roebourne. The findings and recommendations in this report are given in good faith but, in the preparation of this report, we have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, the accuracy, reliability and completeness of the information made available to us in the course of our work, and have not sought to establish the reliability of the information by reference to other evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Activities and Cashflow Report for Period Ending 30 June 2008
    4 July 2008 The Company Announcements Office ASX Limited Via E Lodgement QUARTERLY ACTIVITIES AND CASHFLOW REPORT FOR PERIOD ENDING 30 JUNE 2008 Yours faithfully CAPE LAMBERT IRON ORE LIMITED Ian Burston Executive Chairman Cape Lambert Iron Ore Limited 4 July 2008 June 2008 Quarterly Report Page 2 of 9 REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDING 30 JUNE 2008 COMPANY HIGHLIGHTS Corporate • A General Meeting of Shareholders to consider the sale of the Cape Lambert Iron Ore project is scheduled for 28 July 2008, • A Notice of Meeting has been mailed to Shareholders and can be downloaded from the Company’s website at www.capelam.com.au, • Subject to Shareholders approving the sale of the Project and the receipt of Chinese government approvals, the first tranche of AUD$240 million is to be paid by MCC on 31 July 2008 with payment of the second tranche of AUD$80 million due on 15 September 2008, • At the end of the quarter, the Company had cash of AUD$16.2 million, • During the quarter, 3.3 million options exercisable at AUD$0.90 each on or before 30 June 2008 lapsed without being exercised, • On 28 April 2008, the Company appointed Grant Thornton UK LLP as Nominated Adviser pursuant to its admission to London’s AIM market. Cape Lambert South Project • The 3km long, untested magnetic anomaly located on ELA 47/1493, which is excluded from the MCC sale, has been named the Cape Lambert South Project, • Preliminary enquiries have been issued to drilling contractors to secure a multi- purpose drill rig to enable drilling to commence at Cape Lambert South in September/October 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • J a N H O P E & Partners
    J A N H O P E & PARTNERS PUBLIC RELATIONS CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS ABN 55 042 486 807 Business Iron ore alliance aims to pressure miners for infrastructure access JOHN PHACEAS, PERTH 477 words 19 February 2007 The Age First 1 English © 2007 Copyright John Fairfax Holdings Limited. www.theage.com.au Not available for re- distribution. FOURTEEN prospective Pilbara iron ore miners have formed a fledgling alliance to fight for access to critical transport infrastructure in the region, including the massive port and rail networks of mining giants BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto. The so-called Pilbara Iron Ore Alliance will aim to present a united front to lobby for infrastructure access and investment to unlock hundreds of millions of tonnes of "stranded" iron ore resources in the region. The group is expected to adopt a similar approach to that of the Geraldton Iron Ore Alliance, which was launched last year to present a united voice in representing start-up iron ore miners in the state's mid-west, especially in relation to co-ordinating their conflicting infrastructure requirements. At a meeting at the West Perth headquarters of the Association of Mining and Exploration Companies last week, representatives from the 14 iron ore juniors met to formulate the agenda and core objectives of the alliance. Last week's meeting was initiated by Atlas Iron chief executive David Flanagan, whose company is racing with Fortescue Metals to become the first new iron ore miner in the Pilbara in more than two decades. Atlas hopes to commission its boutique 1-million-tonnes-a-year Pardoo hematite mine near Port Hedland early in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Rio Tinto Iron Ore (Pilbara Iron) Centralized Monitoring Solution
    Case Study: Rio Tinto Iron Ore (Pilbara Iron) Centralized Monitoring Solution of 2007, seven mines all linked by the world’s largest privately owned rail network. CHALLENGES To meet the growing demand for their iron ore, particularly from the ever-growing Chinese market, Pilbara Iron were faced with the challenge of increasing production from their mining operations, or more importantly preventing stoppages in production, while maintaining quality. It was recognized that the process control systems at their processing plants were critical assets required to be available and reliable while keeping the plant within the optimal production limits. At the same time the mining industry, like most industries, was and is facing a worldwide shortage of skilled labor to operate and maintain their plants. Rio Tinto Iron Ore Figure 1. Pilbara Iron’s operations has the added burden of very remote mining operations, making it even harder to attract and retain experienced and skilled labor, PROFILE particularly control and process engineers. The mining operations of Rio Tinto Iron Ore (Pilbara Iron) in Australia are located in the Pilbara Region, In order to offer the benefits of living in a a remote outback area in northwest Western modern thriving city, a group of process control Australia, some 1200 kilometers from Perth. Pilbara professionals was established in Perth. Iron has three export port facilities and, by the end The members of this team came from Rio Tinto A WEB-BASED SOLUTION Asset Utilization, a corporate support group To meet this need a centralized monitoring solution established within Rio Tinto at the time to address was established, with data collection performed at performance improvement across all operations the sites and analysis and diagnosis undertaken worldwide, and Pilbara Iron itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Lambert to Emu Siding Rail Duplication
    Cape Lambert to Emu Siding Rail Duplication Assessment on Proponent Information DRAFT Prepared for Rio Tinto by Strategen April 2011 Cape Lambert to Emu Siding Rail Duplication Assessment on Proponent Information DRAFT Strategen is a trading name of Strategen Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd Level 2, 322 Hay Street Subiaco WA ACN: 056 190 419 April 2011 Disclaimer and Limitation This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Client, in accordance with the agreement between the Client and Strategen (“Agreement”). Strategen accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for it in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any person who is not a party to the Agreement. In particular, it should be noted that this report is a qualitative assessment only, based on the scope of services defined by the Client, budgetary and time constraints imposed by the Client, the information supplied by the Client (and its agents), and the method consistent with the preceding. Strategen has not attempted to verify the accuracy or completeness of the information supplied by the Client. Copyright and any other Intellectual Property arising from the report and the provision of the services in accordance with the Agreement belongs exclusively to Strategen unless otherwise agreed. This document may not be reproduced or disclosed to any person other than the Client without the express written authority of Strategen unless the document has been released for referral and assessment of proposals. Client: Rio Tinto Report Version Prepared
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetite Makes a Comeback Under Magnate
    Australian 10/03/2008 Page: 33 Business News Region: National Circulation: 133000 Type: National Size: 219.06 sq.cms MTWTF Magnetite makesacomeback under magnate Nigel Wilson Hematite is usually associated amount of en-below 65 per cent. Just as impor- Energy writer with alumina. ergy they use fortant is the capability of producing This means that a lot of energy both cost and en-magnetite pellets with less than 5 IAN Burston is a West Australian needs to be employed by steel vironmental rea-per cent silica content. legend, a man synonymous with mills in the sintering process that sons. There are a number of magne- the development of the iron oreremoves impurities such as alu- This makes tite hopefuls in WA, particularly industry in WA. mina. pelletising in in the Murchison region east of Now executive chairman of Magnetite host rocks do not Australia for nat- Geraldton, but Burston argues Cape Lambert Iron Ore, he has containalumina,butcontain Burston ural gas that the Cape Lambert project held many executive manage- silica. rather than thelocated 5km from the Pilbara ment posts in the mining sector Because it has a lower iron oil fuel used in the 1970s and 80s coast, 10km from Rio Tinto's since being Hamersley Iron's content than hematite, magnetite a far more viable proposition. Cape Lambert iron ore port with managing director in the 1970s. has been regardedasaless "`What we are doing is takingdirect connection to nearby infra- There he oversaw the develop- attractive proposition. the energycostof removingstructure and the townships of ment of the mining of hematite In the 1980s, the iron ore alumina from hematite from the Karratha, Roebourne and Wick- first as lump ore then as fines, industry was characterised by steel producers and giving them a ham, make it a shoo-in.
    [Show full text]
  • Disturbance to Mangroves in Tropical-Arid Western Australia: Hypersalinity and Restricted Tidal Exchange As Factors Leading to Mortality
    IJ.. DISTURBANCE TO MANGROVES IN TROPICAL-ARID WESTERN AUSTRALIA: HYPERSALINITY AND RESTRICTED TIDAL EXCHANGE AS FACTORS LEADING TO MORTALITY Environmental Protection Authority Perth, Western Australia Technical Series. No 12 June 1987 052457 DISTURBANCE TO MANGROVES IN TROPICAL -ARID WESTERN AUSTRALIA : HYPERSALINI1Y AND RESTRICTED TIDAL EXCHANGE AS FACTORS LEADING TO MORTALI1Y David M Gordon Centre for Water Research and Botany Department University of Western Australia, Nedlands, 6009, Western Australia Environmental Protection Authority Perth, Western Australia Technical Series. No 12 June 1987 i. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank C Nicholson of the Environmental Protection Authority, Western Australia, for introducing me to the environmental problems of mangroves in this region during preliminary work for this study. R Nunn and D Houghton of Woodside Offshore Petroleum Pty Ltd provided access to the King Bay supply base and low-level aerial photographs of their dredge-spoil area. N Sammy and K Gillen provided access to and information on mangroves within the salt evaporator of Dampier Salt Pty Ltd. D Button of Robe River Iron Associates provided information on mangroves at their Cape Lambert site. R Glass and I L Gordon assisted with collection of soils and I Fetwadjieff with their analysis. The project was funded by Marine Impacts Branch of the Environmental Protection Authority, Western Australia, which provided use of a field station and support, and was carried out during tenure of a research fellowship in the Centre for Water Research, University of Western Australia. i CONTENTS Page i. ACICN'OWLEDGEl\IBNTS ...... ... .. ....... ....... .. .. ....... .. ... ......... .. ......... .... ......... ... .. ii. SUMMARY V 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. MATERIALS AND l\IBTHODS .................. ............... ..................... .. ...... .... .. .. .. 2 2.1 WCATION OF STIJDY ...
    [Show full text]
  • Ports Handbook Western Australia 2016 CONTENTS
    Department of Transport Ports Handbook Western Australia 2016 CONTENTS FOREWORD FROM THE MINISTER 3 INTRODUCTION 4 Western Australian port authorities 2015/16 trade volumes 5 Western Australian port authorities 2015/16 marine boundaries and 6 State resources FREMANTLE PORT AUTHORITY 8 Port of Fremantle 8 KIMBERLEY PORTS AUTHORITY 12 Port of Broome 12 MID WEST PORTS AUTHORITY 15 Port of Geraldton 15 PILBARA PORTS AUTHORITY 18 Port of Dampier 19 Port of Port Hedland 21 Port of Ashburton 23 SOUTHERN PORTS AUTHORITY 24 Port of Albany 26 Port of Bunbury 27 Port of Esperance 28 OTHER PORTS 30 Port of Wyndham 32 CONTACTS 34 The Ports Handbook is updated annually, and is available on the Department of Transport website: www.transport.wa.gov.au Cover: Port of Port Hedland Harbour Port of Esperance 22 FOREWORD FROM THE MINISTER Western Australia’s ports are crucial to the The State Government continues to pursue State’s connection with global markets. initiatives to support Western Australia’s ports, This connection provides our State with including the implementation of the WA Ports limitless trade opportunities, and is built on Governance Review, which is progressing well. the State’s reputation as a safe and reliable The benefits from the first tranche of legislative trading partner. reforms are being realised, with new arrangements As one of the most isolated places in the world, that were introduced in 2014 having strengthened Western Australia relies heavily on shipping port governance, expanding port authority for imports and exports. Shipping remains the planning perspectives across their regions and most cost effective mode of transport, and is strengthening the involvement of the State’s ports especially important for our bulk exports to remain in the planning of future transport corridors.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilbara Freight Study
    OCR171902 PILBARA FREIGHT STUDY 0 Document control record Document prepared by: AureconAUSTRALIAN Australasia FLOATING Pty DECKS Ltd PTY LTD ABNPO BOX 54 8120,005 139 Fremantle 873 High Street LPO, FREMANTLE, WESTERN AUSTRALIA 6160 LevelACN: 165 5, 863 242 Hay 153 Street PerthABN: 86 WA 165 6000 212 153 AustraliaM: +61 (0)417 998573 T: +61 (0)8 93352486 E: [email protected] W: www.australianfloatingdecks.com.au Document control Report title OCR171902 Pilbara Freight Study Document code PFS01 Project number OCR171902 File path Client THE CITY OF KARRATHA Client contact Amanda Trengove Client reference OCR171902 Rev Date Revision details/status Author Reviewer Verifier Approver (if required) 3 02/02/18 DRAFT PTJ DH PTJ Current revision 1 Approval Author signature Approver signature Name PAUL TOUSSAINT-JACKSON Name DAVID HARROD Title DIRECTOR Title ASSOCIATE 1 1.0 Contents 2.0 List of figures ..................................................................................................................................... 6 3.0 List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................... 7 4.0 Definitions ......................................................................................................................................... 8 5.0 Executive summary ........................................................................................................................... 9 6.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UN/LOCODE) for Australia
    United Nations Code for Trade and Transport Locations (UN/LOCODE) for Australia N.B. To check the official, current database of UN/LOCODEs see: https://www.unece.org/cefact/locode/service/location.html UN/LOCODE Location Name State Functionality Status Coordinatesi AU 2CO Tyabb VIC Road terminal; Recognised location 3815S 14511E AU 2IC Tarneit VIC Road terminal; Recognised location 3752S 14440E AU 2SN Yarrawarrah NSW Road terminal; Recognised location 3403S 15102E AU 2TO Wollert VIC Road terminal; Recognised location 3735S 14502E AU 2UA Woolooware NSW Road terminal; Recognised location 3403S 15108E AU 2VC Springvale South VIC Road terminal; Recognised location 3758S 14509E AU 2WS Brooklyn NSW Road terminal; Recognised location 3333S 15114E AU 32S Seaford SA Road terminal; Recognised location 3511S 13828E AU 3CI Rythdale VIC Road terminal; Recognised location 3808S 14526E AU 3CO Upwey VIC Road terminal; Recognised location 3754S 14520E AU 3WS Yowie Bay NSW Road terminal; Recognised location 3403S 15106E AU 4VC Strathewen VIC Road terminal; Recognised location 3733S 14516E AU 5CI Selby VIC Port; Multimodal function, ICD etc.; Recognised location 3755S 14523E AU 5CO Wantirna VIC Road terminal; Recognised location 3751S 14513E AU 5RC Werribee South VIC Road terminal; Recognised location 3756S 14443E AU 5TO Yan Yean VIC Road terminal; Recognised location 3734S 14506E AU 5WA Pilbara WA Road terminal; Recognised location 2115S 11818E AU 6CO Warrandyte VIC Road terminal; Recognised location 3745S 14514E AU 6DF West Hoxton NSW Road terminal; Recognised
    [Show full text]
  • Cossack Precinct ______
    SHIRE OF ROEBOURNE LGHI PLACE RECORD FORM Place No. 9 Cossack Precinct _______________________________________________________________________ Police complex and Post and Telegraph Office, Cossack, 2009, courtesy National Trust of Australia (WA) LOCATION Name of Place Cossack Precinct Other Name (1) Tien Tsin; Port Walcott; Butcher's Inlet Location/Address Street Number Street Name Suburb/Town Cossack Other Locational descriptor (text) The whole of the land contained within the area bounded by Wickham Street, Dampier Street, Pearl Street, Ward Street, Pilot Street, Perseverance Street, Settlers Beach Road to the Cemetery at Lots 422 & 433, and the foreshore to the high water mark (including the Land Backed Wharf), and including Butchers Inlet from southern extent of Vampire Island to Perserverance Rocks. mE519294 mN 7712784 Longitude 117.1853 Latitude -20.6843 OWNERSHIP & LAND DESCRIPTION Item Owner Address Phone/fax Status No. 1. State of Western Australia 2. State of Western Australia (Lease to: the Shire of Roebourne) 3. State of Western Australia (Management Order to: the Shire of Roebourne) 4. Terry John Patterson 5. David Ballantine Fairgrieve 6. Helen Margaret Wilson 7. Helen Margaret Wilson & Constance Boyd Berryman as Executors 8. Trustees of the Northern Diocese 9. Shane Francis Donovan & Vikki Ann Bull 10. Geoffrey Peter Van Waardenberg 11. Kerry Edward Quealy SHIRE OF ROEBOURNE LOCAL GOVERNMENT HERITAGE INVENTORY 84 SHIRE OF ROEBOURNE LGHI PLACE RECORD FORM 12. Memorial Book. Owner deceased 13. David Ballantine Fairgrieve 14. William Dalgety Moore (Deceased) 15. Louis Peter Samson and Kerry-Lee Samson 16. Memorial Book. Owner deceased 17. Michelle Marie Otto Land Description Various Reserve No. Lot/Location No.
    [Show full text]
  • WA Iron Ore Profile – June 2020 1
    Western Australia Iron Ore Profile June 2020 THE WORLD IRON ORE MARKET Major global iron ore1 suppliers Western Australia accounted for two-thirds Western Australia of the world’s additional iron ore supply Brazil between 2009 and 2019. China Western Australia is the largest iron ore supplier in the world, accounting for 37% India of global supply in 2019, followed by Brazil Russia (16%). 2009 China (12%), India (10%) and Russia Ukraine 2019 (5%) are major global iron ore suppliers, South Africa but retain most of their production for domestic steel manufacturing. Iran In 2019, iron ore supply from: Canada • Western Australia fell 1% to 878Mt. United States • Brazil fell 14% to 384Mt. • China rose 13% to 271Mt. 0Mt 200Mt 400Mt 600Mt 800Mt 1000Mt • India rose 15% to 235Mt. 1 Mined iron ore. Source: Wood Mackenzie, Global Iron Ore Markets Long-term Outlook Data 2020 Q1. Asian iron ore1 demand Asia accounted for 78% of global iron ore 2000Mt demand in 2019, with China (58%), India (9%), Japan (5%) and South Korea (3%) having the largest shares. 1500Mt In 2019, Asia’s iron ore demand rose 4% to 1,690Mt. Within Asia, iron ore demand from: 1000Mt • China rose 5% to 1,248Mt. • Japan, South Korea and Taiwan combined fell 2% to 209Mt. • Rest of Asia rose 6% to 232Mt. 500Mt Wood Mackenzie forecasts Asia’s iron ore demand will fall by 9 million tonnes from 2019 to 2039. Lower demand in China 0Mt (down 238Mt) and Japan, South Korea 2009 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034 2039 and Taiwan combined (down 22Mt) will be China Japan, South Korea & Taiwan Rest of Asia(a) largely offset by growth in the rest of Asia 1 Total iron ore consumption.
    [Show full text]