DOCSLIB.ORG

A Review of the National Sentinel Hive Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Review of the National Sentinel Hive Program A Review of the National Sentinel Hive Program in Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, Western Australia and the Northern Territory Pat Boland Biosecurity Australia June 2005 Acknowledgments This review would not have been possible without the assistance of a large number of people. Those who enthusiastically gave time and effort to help collect the information include officers of the Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service (AQIS), officers from State departments of agriculture, port authority staff, members and staff of the Australian Honey Bee Industry Council, and beekeepers. Appreciation is due to: Jeff Beard, Agriculture WA Matt Marinovich, beekeeper, Perth Sam Brewster, Bunbury David McMillan, MAF, NZ Bob Brunner, PCQ Ross Newman, QDPI, Qld John Curran, AQIS Broome Bob Perkins, beekeeper, Sydney Neville Cutts, Richmond Tony Postle, AQIS, Broome Laurie Dewar, AHBIC Jack Shield, QDPI, Cairns Paula Dewar, AHBIC John Sicari, AQIS, Dampier John Edmonds, beekeeper, Geelong Vicki Simlesa, DPIF, NT Ted Flower, beekeeper, Newcastle Karen Skelton, QDPI, Qld Sue Foster, beekeeper, Kununurra Ian Spicer, Agriculture WA, Bunbury Russell Goodman, DPI, Vic Helen Syer, AQIS, Vic Patricia Greer, QDPI, Qld Stan Taylor, beekeeper, Wyndham Sue Haenkel, beekeeper, Sydney Ian Tayor, AQIS, Portland Tony Hill, beekeeper, Sydney Bill Trend, Agriculture WA David Holford, BTRE, Canberra Alex Veilandt, beekeeper, Broome Tom Holt, beekeeper, Perth Ray Ward, beekeeper, Dampier Mike Jones, Agriculture WA, Geraldton Stephen Ware, CEO, AHBIC Peter Kaczynski, DPI, Vic Trevor Weatherhead, AHBIC Hamish Lamb, QDPI, Qld Bruce White, NSW Agriculture, NSW Mark Leidel, AQIS, Pt Hedland Andrew Ygosse, QDPI, Townsville 1 Table of contents A Review of the National Sentinel Hive Program..............................................................................................1 Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................................................3 Background to the National Sentinel Hive Program...........................................................................................3 Background to the Review .................................................................................................................................5 Risks of entry of honeybee pests .......................................................................................................................5 Asian honeybee Apis cerana .............................................................................................................................6 Funding principles ..............................................................................................................................................7 Research needs .................................................................................................................................................8 Intensity of surveillance ......................................................................................................................................9 Acaracidal products used in the program...........................................................................................................9 Payment of beekeeper's costs .........................................................................................................................10 Other issues .....................................................................................................................................................11 Recommendations ...........................................................................................................................................12 A. General recommendations for the program ........................................................................................................ 12 B. Recommendations for particular locations.......................................................................................................... 12 List of incursions and potential incursions involving honeybee pests..............................................................15 List of originally established ports subject to surveillance under NSHP ..........................................................17 National Sentinel Hive Program - Number of samples ....................................................................................18 Estimate of relative risks for entry of exotic bees.............................................................................................19 Notes on individual ports visited.......................................................................................................................21 Sydney ......................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Newcastle..................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Melbourne .................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Western Port ................................................................................................................................................................ 22 Geelong........................................................................................................................................................................ 22 Portland........................................................................................................................................................................ 23 Fremantle ..................................................................................................................................................................... 23 Kwinana........................................................................................................................................................................ 23 Bunbury........................................................................................................................................................................ 24 Broome......................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Wyndham ..................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Port Hedland ................................................................................................................................................................ 25 Dampier........................................................................................................................................................................ 25 Port Walcott.................................................................................................................................................................. 26 Geraldton...................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Brisbane ....................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Townsville..................................................................................................................................................................... 27 Cairns........................................................................................................................................................................... 27 Darwin .......................................................................................................................................................................... 27 Gove............................................................................................................................................................................. 28 References .......................................................................................................................................................29 2 Executive Summary The National Sentinel Hive Program was established in 2000 to enhance surveillance for honeybee parasites (most notably varroa) and exotic bees in the vicinity of seaports. The purpose of the program is assist the early detection of these parasites and bees. This will provide a better chance that an incursion will be eradicated or that an eradication program is smaller and less costly. A strong feature of the program is the close collaboration and cooperation between the honeybee industry, State departments of agriculture and Biosecurity Australia. While the program is currently part-funded by Biosecurity Australia, there are significant 'in kind' costs which are met by the respective State department of agriculture and by participating beekeepers. The National Sentinel Hive Program operates at 27 ports and the review covered 20 ports in New South Wales (NSW), Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, Northern Territory and Western Australia. The review makes a number of general recommendations for the program as well as specific ones for particular locations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Disturbance to Mangroves in Tropical-Arid Western Australia: Hypersalinity and Restricted Tidal Exchange As Factors Leading to Mortality
    IJ.. DISTURBANCE TO MANGROVES IN TROPICAL-ARID WESTERN AUSTRALIA: HYPERSALINITY AND RESTRICTED TIDAL EXCHANGE AS FACTORS LEADING TO MORTALITY Environmental Protection Authority Perth, Western Australia Technical Series. No 12 June 1987 052457 DISTURBANCE TO MANGROVES IN TROPICAL -ARID WESTERN AUSTRALIA : HYPERSALINI1Y AND RESTRICTED TIDAL EXCHANGE AS FACTORS LEADING TO MORTALI1Y David M Gordon Centre for Water Research and Botany Department University of Western Australia, Nedlands, 6009, Western Australia Environmental Protection Authority Perth, Western Australia Technical Series. No 12 June 1987 i. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank C Nicholson of the Environmental Protection Authority, Western Australia, for introducing me to the environmental problems of mangroves in this region during preliminary work for this study. R Nunn and D Houghton of Woodside Offshore Petroleum Pty Ltd provided access to the King Bay supply base and low-level aerial photographs of their dredge-spoil area. N Sammy and K Gillen provided access to and information on mangroves within the salt evaporator of Dampier Salt Pty Ltd. D Button of Robe River Iron Associates provided information on mangroves at their Cape Lambert site. R Glass and I L Gordon assisted with collection of soils and I Fetwadjieff with their analysis. The project was funded by Marine Impacts Branch of the Environmental Protection Authority, Western Australia, which provided use of a field station and support, and was carried out during tenure of a research fellowship in the Centre for Water Research, University of Western Australia. i CONTENTS Page i. ACICN'OWLEDGEl\IBNTS ...... ... .. ....... ....... .. .. ....... .. ... ......... .. ......... .... ......... ... .. ii. SUMMARY V 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. MATERIALS AND l\IBTHODS .................. ............... ..................... .. ...... .... .. .. .. 2 2.1 WCATION OF STIJDY ...
    [Show full text]
  • Ports Handbook Western Australia 2016 CONTENTS
    Department of Transport Ports Handbook Western Australia 2016 CONTENTS FOREWORD FROM THE MINISTER 3 INTRODUCTION 4 Western Australian port authorities 2015/16 trade volumes 5 Western Australian port authorities 2015/16 marine boundaries and 6 State resources FREMANTLE PORT AUTHORITY 8 Port of Fremantle 8 KIMBERLEY PORTS AUTHORITY 12 Port of Broome 12 MID WEST PORTS AUTHORITY 15 Port of Geraldton 15 PILBARA PORTS AUTHORITY 18 Port of Dampier 19 Port of Port Hedland 21 Port of Ashburton 23 SOUTHERN PORTS AUTHORITY 24 Port of Albany 26 Port of Bunbury 27 Port of Esperance 28 OTHER PORTS 30 Port of Wyndham 32 CONTACTS 34 The Ports Handbook is updated annually, and is available on the Department of Transport website: www.transport.wa.gov.au Cover: Port of Port Hedland Harbour Port of Esperance 22 FOREWORD FROM THE MINISTER Western Australia’s ports are crucial to the The State Government continues to pursue State’s connection with global markets. initiatives to support Western Australia’s ports, This connection provides our State with including the implementation of the WA Ports limitless trade opportunities, and is built on Governance Review, which is progressing well. the State’s reputation as a safe and reliable The benefits from the first tranche of legislative trading partner. reforms are being realised, with new arrangements As one of the most isolated places in the world, that were introduced in 2014 having strengthened Western Australia relies heavily on shipping port governance, expanding port authority for imports and exports. Shipping remains the planning perspectives across their regions and most cost effective mode of transport, and is strengthening the involvement of the State’s ports especially important for our bulk exports to remain in the planning of future transport corridors.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilbara Freight Study
    OCR171902 PILBARA FREIGHT STUDY 0 Document control record Document prepared by: AureconAUSTRALIAN Australasia FLOATING Pty DECKS Ltd PTY LTD ABNPO BOX 54 8120,005 139 Fremantle 873 High Street LPO, FREMANTLE, WESTERN AUSTRALIA 6160 LevelACN: 165 5, 863 242 Hay 153 Street PerthABN: 86 WA 165 6000 212 153 AustraliaM: +61 (0)417 998573 T: +61 (0)8 93352486 E: [email protected] W: www.australianfloatingdecks.com.au Document control Report title OCR171902 Pilbara Freight Study Document code PFS01 Project number OCR171902 File path Client THE CITY OF KARRATHA Client contact Amanda Trengove Client reference OCR171902 Rev Date Revision details/status Author Reviewer Verifier Approver (if required) 3 02/02/18 DRAFT PTJ DH PTJ Current revision 1 Approval Author signature Approver signature Name PAUL TOUSSAINT-JACKSON Name DAVID HARROD Title DIRECTOR Title ASSOCIATE 1 1.0 Contents 2.0 List of figures ..................................................................................................................................... 6 3.0 List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................... 7 4.0 Definitions ......................................................................................................................................... 8 5.0 Executive summary ........................................................................................................................... 9 6.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cossack Precinct ______
    SHIRE OF ROEBOURNE LGHI PLACE RECORD FORM Place No. 9 Cossack Precinct _______________________________________________________________________ Police complex and Post and Telegraph Office, Cossack, 2009, courtesy National Trust of Australia (WA) LOCATION Name of Place Cossack Precinct Other Name (1) Tien Tsin; Port Walcott; Butcher's Inlet Location/Address Street Number Street Name Suburb/Town Cossack Other Locational descriptor (text) The whole of the land contained within the area bounded by Wickham Street, Dampier Street, Pearl Street, Ward Street, Pilot Street, Perseverance Street, Settlers Beach Road to the Cemetery at Lots 422 & 433, and the foreshore to the high water mark (including the Land Backed Wharf), and including Butchers Inlet from southern extent of Vampire Island to Perserverance Rocks. mE519294 mN 7712784 Longitude 117.1853 Latitude -20.6843 OWNERSHIP & LAND DESCRIPTION Item Owner Address Phone/fax Status No. 1. State of Western Australia 2. State of Western Australia (Lease to: the Shire of Roebourne) 3. State of Western Australia (Management Order to: the Shire of Roebourne) 4. Terry John Patterson 5. David Ballantine Fairgrieve 6. Helen Margaret Wilson 7. Helen Margaret Wilson & Constance Boyd Berryman as Executors 8. Trustees of the Northern Diocese 9. Shane Francis Donovan & Vikki Ann Bull 10. Geoffrey Peter Van Waardenberg 11. Kerry Edward Quealy SHIRE OF ROEBOURNE LOCAL GOVERNMENT HERITAGE INVENTORY 84 SHIRE OF ROEBOURNE LGHI PLACE RECORD FORM 12. Memorial Book. Owner deceased 13. David Ballantine Fairgrieve 14. William Dalgety Moore (Deceased) 15. Louis Peter Samson and Kerry-Lee Samson 16. Memorial Book. Owner deceased 17. Michelle Marie Otto Land Description Various Reserve No. Lot/Location No.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Lambert Port B Development
    Cape Lambert Port B Development ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING DOCUMENT 26 June 2008 Cape Lambert Port B Development ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING DOCUMENT 26 June 2008 Sinclair Knight Merz 7th Floor, Durack Centre 263 Adelaide Terrace PO Box H615 Perth WA 6001 Australia Tel: +61 8 9268 4400 Fax: +61 8 9268 4488 Web: www.skmconsulting.com LIMITATION: This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd’s Client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between Sinclair Knight Merz and its Client. Sinclair Knight Merz accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. The SKM logo is a trade mark of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd. © Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd, 2006 Cape Lambert Port B Development Environmental Scoping Document Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Purpose of Environmental Scoping Document 1 1.3 Identification of Proponent 2 1.4 Existing Facilities 3 1.5 Project Justification and local context 3 1.6 Early Works 4 2. Summary of Proposal 5 2.1 Proposal Outline 5 2.2 Approvals Strategy 5 2.3 Key Project Characteristics 5 2.4 Stockyard Management 6 2.5 Ore Delivery Systems 6 2.6 Wharf Works 6 2.7 Dredging Program 7 2.8 Services and Utilities 7 2.8.1 Support and Infrastructure Facilities 7 2.8.2 Water Supply 7 2.9 Alternatives Considered 8 3. Applicable Legislation 9 3.1 Western Australian Legislation 9 3.2 Commonwealth Legislation 9 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020/21 Statement of Corporate Intent Pilbara Ports Authority STATEMENT of CORPORATE ~ ~ FPILBARA PORTS INTENT 2020/21 ~ AUTHORITY
    . ~:,-{:..--:- 1 rt:;.'_j ·•• - • l I ·• ~· . ............ .~ .Siii.;'. ·-~~;:;:;~ - - ., .:_ ,. :...:,·. ,,,. .. : .1 -~ - -·· ~t- - . - ..:~~ili ~ - •'-4A l i."l"f.'-, l •• i..:,•·. '. --~ - , •., ·~.. • : , . I 2020/21 Statement of Corporate Intent Pilbara Ports Authority STATEMENT OF CORPORATE ~ ~ FPILBARA PORTS INTENT 2020/21 ~ AUTHORITY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. FOREWORD .... ... ........ ... .. .. .. ... .. ..... .. ... ... .... .. ....... .. ........ ... .... ........ .. .. .. ..... .. ..... ....... ....... 3 2. STRATEGIC CONTEXT ...... ...... ..... ..... ...... .... .... ..... .. ... ........................ ... ... .... .............. 4 2.1 Legislative Context .... ... .. .... ..... ... ....... .. .... .... .... ...... ....... ....... ..... .. .... .. .... .. .... .... ... 4 2.2 Port Governance Review ...... ........................ ..... .. .... .... ... ..... .... ....... .... ... ... ... ... .4 2.3 Port Services ............. .... .............. ........ ... ... ..... ... .... ......... ...... ..... .. ... .... ..... ...... .. .4 2.4 Assets and Port Facilities ... .... ............. ... ........................... .. ... ... .... ...... ...... ..... ... 5 2.5 Major Customers .. ............. .... ............................. ... ..... .. .... ..... ........ .... .. ...... ....... 6 2.6 Current and Emerging Markets .. .. ................... .. ........................... ..... .. ....... .. ..... 6 2.7 Procurement .. .... ......... ... .. ... ....... .. ... .... .... ... ..... ........ ... .. ... .... .. .. .... .... .... ..
    [Show full text]
  • Dampier Archipelago
    when humpback whales are commonly seen migrating migrating seen commonly are whales humpback when in particular rock engravings. engravings. rock particular in • Firearms are not permitted on the islands. Whale watching is popular between June and September September and June between popular is watching Whale opportunity to see excellent examples of Aboriginal heritage, heritage, Aboriginal of examples excellent see to opportunity Caring for the Dampier Archipelago The islands, like the Burrup Peninsula, offer the unique unique the offer Peninsula, Burrup the like islands, The and diving popular. diving and • Camping is permitted only on selected islands up to • Fish for the future. Observe size, bag and possession grass and more than 650 species of fish make snorkelling snorkelling make fish of species 650 than more and grass limits. Quickly return undersized and unwanted fish to reptiles found on the islands. the on found reptiles 100 metres inland of the high water mark on beaches with the Great Barrier Reef. Coral reefs, sponge gardens, sea sea gardens, sponge reefs, Coral Reef. Barrier Great the with the water. Use wet hands or a wet cloth when handling the rare Pilbara olive python, one of 41 species of terrestrial terrestrial of species 41 of one python, olive Pilbara rare the zoned for recreation (see map) and for no more than five biodiversity known in Western Australia, and is comparable comparable is and Australia, Western in known biodiversity fish and avoid placing them on hot dry surfaces. among the rock piles on the larger islands or, if very lucky, lucky, very if or, islands larger the on piles rock the among consecutive nights.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of a Direct Maritime Freight Service for the Pilbara Final Report
    Pilbara Development Commission The impact of a Direct Maritime Freight Service for the Pilbara Final Report Final issued | 11 February 2019 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 262552-00 Arup Pty Ltd ABN 18 000 966 165 Arup Level 5 151 Clarence Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia www.arup.com Document Verification Job title The impact of a Direct Maritime Freight Service for Job number the Pilbara 262552-00 Document title Final Report File reference Document ref Revision Date Filename Draft 1 2 1 Dec Description First draft 2018 Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Frank Boyce Tristan Durie Philip Fisher Signature Draft 2 2 5th Jan Filename 2019 Description Final draft Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Frank Boyce Tristan Durie Philip Fisher Signature Final 1 1 Feb Filename 2019 Description Final issued Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Frank Boyce Tristan Durie Philip Fisher Signature Filename Description Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Signature Issue Document Verification with Document | Final issued | 11 February 2019 | Arup Pilbara Development Commission The impact of a Direct Maritime Freight Service for the Pilbara Final Report Contents Page 1 Introduction 3 2 Background 4 2.1 Pilbara Region 4 2.2 Freight Needs 5 2.3 Current Inbound Logistics 6 2.4 The Proposed Option 8 3 Approach 9 3.1 CGE Modelling 10 3.2 Additional economic analysis 11 4 Economic benefits 16 4.1 CGE modelling 16 4.2 Additional economic benefits 19 5 Conclusion 23 5.1 Further work 23 | Final issued | 11 February 2019 | Arup Pilbara Development Commission The impact of a Direct Maritime Freight Service for the Pilbara Final Report Transport and infrastructure Council.
    [Show full text]
  • PILBARA Economic Perspective
    An update on the economy of Western Australia’s Pilbara Region. TOURISM - Visitor Centre at the Region's iconic Karijini National Park. PILBARA Economic Perspective SHIPPING - The ports in the LNG EXPORTS - The Pilbara SALT HARVESTING - The IRON ORE EXPORTS - The Pilbara handle tonnages far Region produces all of Pilbara has the largest solar Pilbara Region produces more in excess of other ports in Western Australia's liquefied salt fields in Australia. than 95 per cent of Australia’s the State. natural gas (LNG). iron ore exports. PILBARA Economic Perspective FOREWORD The Pilbara Economic Perspective was prepared by the Department of Local Government and Regional Development in conjunction with the Pilbara Development Commission, as one of a series of nine documents. Each document addresses a different non-metropolitan region of the State. The Economic Perspectives are the core economic documents for the regions and provide a useful insight into regional Western Australia. Each document has been prepared in an easy-to-read format and provides the latest available information on population, labour force and employment, taxable income, tourism, fishing and aquaculture, agriculture, mining, construction, manufacturing, commerce, project investment, indigenous economic development and infrastructure. Each economic section contains a brief analysis and is supported by graphs to illustrate the trend over time. The Pilbara Region is located in the north west of Western Australia, with landscapes ranging from the dry, arid western desert to the spectacular coastline of the Dampier Archipelago. Residents and visitors to the Region enjoy its many attractions, from the Karijini and Millstream National Parks to boating and snorkelling in the waters off its coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Lambert Port A-Dolphin (Australia)
    Project informations Cape Lambert Port A-Dolphin (Australia) © 2021 Austral & RIO Tinto Project description mageba scope Highlights & facts Rio Tinto owns an integrated portfolio of For this project in total 36 RESTON® iron ore assets in the Pilbara region of SPHERICAL bearings with uplift restraint mageba products: Western Australia including 16 mines, 4 in- were produced and installed. Type: RESTON®SPHERICAL dependent port terminals, a 1,700 km rail The bearings were designed to perform in bearings network and other related infrastructure. harsh environment, therefore their fabri- Feature: Uplift restraint One of its facilities is the Cape Lambert cation had to follow a strict quality control Installed: 2020 iron-ore port which is located about process. 1,250 km north of the Western Australian In order to ensure that the quality of the Structure: capital of Perth. steel used for the production of the bear- City: Port Walcott (WA) The Cape Lambert “A” wharf has been in ings is the highest, at the procurement Country: Australia operation since 1972, but its original 17 stage, each steel plate’s mechanical and Type: Wharf dolphins were either demolished or de- chemical properties were tested in a third Owner: Rio Tinto commissioned in 1999. The existing and party ILAC accredited Lab to ensure their Contractor: Austral Construction still operational dolphins were installed compliance to the AS3678 requirements. Pty Ltd between 2001 and 2002. In addition, mageba also commissioned Structural designer: Aurecon During a recent structural integrity inspec- the same lab to perform an ultrasonic test- tions of the entire system, structural de- ing on each steel plate to meet with AS fects were identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Loss of MV Starfish
    i CONTENTS Summary ii Persons Interviewed iii Cargo Loading 1 The Foundering 5 Condition of the Starfish 6 Port State Control 7 Cargo Loading Operation 7 Discharge of Ballast 8 Change of Registry 8 Weather Conditions 9 Conclusions 10 Appendix 1 Attachment 1: Details of Ship Attachment 2 : Cargo Declaration Attachment 3 : Letter to Master Attachment 4: Loading Sequences Attachment 5: Half Loaded Condition Attachment 6: Draught Survey Report Attachment 7: Ballast Distribution Record Attachment 7a: Ballast Distribution Fair Copy Attachment 8: Synoptic Chart 28 March 1991 Attachment 9: Weather Summary Attachment 10: Weather Observations ZBWF ii SUMMARY The Panamanian registered bulk carrier Starfish sailed from Port Walcott, Western Australia on 22 March 1991 with 53549 tonnes of iron ore fines for the Polish port of Swinoujscie. It is reported that the Starfish diverted to Port Louis, Mauritius on 1 April, when the ship’s crew observed the vessel to be riding low in the water and water was discovered in numbers 6 and 7 cargo holds. The vessel arrived off Port Louis on 3 April, but was ordered from the outer anchorage on 7 April when the ship threatened to cause a major pollution incident. The Starfish was escorted to deep water, 40 miles west of Mauritius and some 60 miles north of Ile de La Reunion, by a vessel of the Mauritius National Coast Guard. The crew of the Starfish was taken on board the Coast Guard vessel before the Starfish sank on 8 April. The Australian Marine Investigation Unit, in accordance with the International Maritime Organisation Resolution A440 (XI) “Exchange Of Information for Investigations into Marine Casualties” and under the provisions of the Navigation (Marine Casualty) Regulations, undertook an investigation of the evidence that was available within Australia to assist the Panamanian Authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Dampier PORT Burrup Peninsula
    DAMPIER PORT BURRUP PENINSULA 1 OUR INTENT OUR COMMITMENT 2 Overview Of POrt OPeratiOns annual rePOrt 09 7TiI 1it,yrr Dampier Bulk Liquids Berth Our VisiOn To be respected for our contribution to State Development and as a Port operator in the community we serve. Our PurPOse To bring growth and prosperity to the region and the State through the provision of safe, secure, efficient, and innovative management of the Port of Dampier. Our Values Integrity in our dealings Professionalism in our work Value for Money to our customers Care for our environment, our staff and community Teamwork for shared success Exceeding stakeholder expectations and delivering operational excellence is the pervading criterion for all port activities and services. Sound decision making and strategic thinking is critical to the future success of the Port. Effective planning and maintaining a visionary approach develops mutually beneficial relationships between key proponents, government agencies, the State and the community. These relationships have enabled sustainable economic development and shared success. The Dampier Port Authority (DPA) has redefined the Port’s capabilities with the aim of providing strategic advice, quality port facilities and delivering exceptional customer service. Integrity in all dealings is paramount, as the decisions made today will impact generations to come. DPA stands firm on the commitment to carefully consider environmental, social, heritage and community impacts from commercial activities within the Port of Dampier and the Pilbara region of Western Australia. This is achieved through balancing the development of one of the most important industrial and trade centres in Australia, whilst preserving the peninsula and adjoining marine environments.
    [Show full text]