DOCSLIB.ORG

Impact of Integrated Pest Management Modules on the Activity of Natural Enemies in Castor Ecosystem

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

J. Biol. Control, 23(3): 221–228, 2009 Impact of integrated pest management modules on the activity of natural enemies in castor ecosystem H. BASAPPA Directorate of Oilseeds Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad 500030, Andhra Pradesh, India. E–mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Investigations were carried out during 2001–2004 to study the impact of biointensive integrated pest management (BIPM), chemical pesticide intensive integrated pest management (CIPM) modules and non–integrated pest management (non–IPM) modules (farmers’ practice) on the natural enemies of insect pests of castor in Andhra Pradesh. BIPM module proved to be relatively safer to natural enemies with 16.13 and 66.10 % average field parasitization of Achaea janata (L.) eggs and larvae by Trichogramma chilonis Ishii and Microplitis maculipennis Szepligeti, compared to 6.92 and 21.2, 8.80 and 24.00, 8.92 and 22.35 % in CIPM module and non–IPM modules 1 and 2, respectively. M. maculipennis cocoon number per plant increased with increase in duration after treatment in the BIPM module whereas it decreased in CIPM and non–IPM modules. Similarly, average parasitisation by Charops obtusus Morley (3.54%), Rhogas spp. (4.60%), Apanteles hyposidrae Wilkinson (13.85%), Euplectrus maternus Bhatnagar (7.92%) on A. janata larvae and Cotesia flavipes Cameron (8.96%) on Spodoptera litura (F.) was higher in the BIPM module compared to CIPM module (1.65, 1.59, 3.50, 2.37 and 2.49%) and non–IPM modules 1(1.16, 0.80, 2.70, 1.20 and 2.68%) and 2 (1.50, 1.19, 2.80, 3.82 and 1.99%), respectively. BIPM module had higher population of predators like Chrysoperla sp., Cheilomenes sexmaculata (Fabricius), Cantheconidea furcellata (Wolff), Rhynocoris kumarii Ambrose and Livingstone and spiders per 10 plants (8.45, 3.41, 3.27 and 7.10) than CIPM module (1.75, 2.90, 1.38, 1.45 and 1.40) and non–IPM modules 1(1.20, 1.82, 1.00, 1.00 and 1.80) and 2 (1.97, 2.41, 1.32, 1.22 and 2.90), respectively. Black drongo (Dicrurus adsimilis Blyth) and Indian myna (Acridotheres tristis (L.)) were the predominant predatory birds which used bird perches frequently while predating on A. janata, S. litura and Conogethes punctiferalis (Guenee) larvae in BIPM and CIPM modules compared to non–IPM modules. KEY WORDS: Castor, insect pests, natural enemies, impact, biointensive integrated pest management (BIPM), chemical pesticide intensive integrated pest management (CIPM) INTRODUCTION Biointensive integrated pest management (BIPM) and chemical pesticide intensive integrated pest management Andhra Pradesh in the southern part and Gujarat and Rajasthan in the western part are the major castor producing (CIPM) modules were developed and validated by states in India. In the traditional castor growing areas of comparing with non–integrated pest management Andhra Pradesh, the crop is grown under rainfed conditions (non–IPM) module1 (farmers’ practice with wilt resistant where there are several production constraints, especially castor variety Jyoti) and 2 (farmers’ practice without variety biotic constraints and hence productivity is very low (387 Jyoti) in a farmers’ participatory approach in Andhra kg ha-1) compared to western part (1864 kg ha-1). Pradesh in the southern part of India during 2001–2004. During validation of BIPM, CIPM and non–IPM modules, A wide array of biocontrol agents has been documented on major insect pests of castor. In castor ecosystem, the simultaneous investigations were also carried out to egg parasitoid, Trichogramma chilonis Ishii, the larval study their impact on the activity of natural enemies parasitoid, Microplitis maculipennis Szepligeti, insect of major insect pests in castor ecosystem. Conservation of predators, spiders, insectivorous birds and some of the these natural enemies in the castor ecosystem is essential microbial agents exert greater biological resistance on the for effective, eco–friendly and sustainable pest succession of the pest complex of castor. management. BASAPPA MATERIALS AND METHODS Benchmark survey and training of farmers in IPM Field School Under National Agricultural Technology Project (NATP) on “Development of IPM Modules for Oilseeds A benchmark survey was conducted among the farmers and nutritious Cereals based Production system (ROPS– growing castor crop in different villages to know their level 8)” a farmers’ participatory integrated pest management of knowledge on natural enemies of various insect pests of (IPM) programme was validated in the traditional castor castor. Two group leaders of farmers (IPM coordinators) areas of Maheswaram watershed in four villages (Kandkur, from each village who were involved in IPM programme Mohammad Nagar, Nednoor and Debbadguda) in Kandkur were trained in the IPM Field School on identification of mandal and one village (Tummalur) in Maheswaram mandal different stages of natural enemies of major insect pests of in Ranga Reddy district of Andhra Pradesh during 2001–02, castor and other IPM components. IPM coordinators from 2002–03 and 2003–04. each village in turn trained the remaining castor farmers Table 1. Pest management interventions in biointensive, chemical pesticide-intensive and non–IPM modules in castor ecosystem IPM Modules Pest management interventions BIPM Regular crop rotation of castor with sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) Summer ploughing Seed treatment with carbendazim @ 2g kg-1 seed Use of wilt resistant castor variety Jyoti (DCS–9) Hand picking and destruction of egg masses and early stage larvae of tobacco caterpillar and hairy caterpillars as well as capsules affected by capsule borer and Botrytis Use of neem seed kernel extract (NSKE 5%) against defoliators Fix dried tree branches as bird perches (15 ha-1) to attract predatory birds Vegetative trapping with Jatropha curcas L. twigs and manual killing of red hairy caterpillar Spray carbendazim @1gl-l against Botrytis and application of 10 kg nitrogen ha-1 after cyclonic rains to get additional spikes. CIPM Regular crop rotation of castor with sorghum Summer ploughing Seed treatment with carbendazim @ 2g kg-1 seed Use of wilt resistant castor variety Jyoti (DCS–9) Fix dried tree branches as bird perches(15 ha-1) to attract predatory birds Spray endosulfan (0.07%) against castor semilooper, chlorpyriphos (0.05%) against tobacco caterpillar and monocrotophos (0.05%) against capsule borer Opening furrow around the fields and apply quinalphos dust (1.5%) against red hairy caterpillar Spray carbendazim @1gl-1 against Botrytis and application of 10 kg nitrogen ha-1 to get additional spikes Non–IPM Quinalphos and monocrotophos spray against castor semilooper and carbendazim against Botrytis. Quinalphos + monocrotophos + cypermethrin against castor semilooper Cypermethrin + carbendazim against castor semilooper and Botrytis. Dimethoate + carbendazim against castor semilooper and Botrytis. Metasystax + monocrotophos against castor semilooper Recording observations on natural enemies on IPM components, especially natural enemies of insect Development and validation of IPM modules pests of castor. IPM farmers were trained on utilization of All the castor IPM farmers from the five villages various IPM components under BIPM and CIPM modules were involved in developing and imposing the BIPM and at different phenological stages of the crop based on the CIPM modules. Different pest management interventions severity of different insect pests and diseases. followed under each module are given in Table 1. BIPM 222 Impact of IPM modules on natural enemies in castor ecosystem and CIPM modules were compared with farmers’ practice 2001–02 and 14.00 % during 2002–03 and 2003–04), 6.92 (non–IPM module) by regularly recording crop protection (8.65% during 2001–02 and 5.20 % during 2002–03 and practices followed by farmers from seedling stage till 2003–04), 8.80 (2002–03 and 2003–04) and 8.92 (7.05% harvest. An experiment was laid out in 16 ha area using during 2001–02 and 10.80 % during 2002–03 and 2003–04) minimum 0.40ha castor field per module with buffer castor in CIPM, non–IPM module 1 and 2, respectively (Table 2). crop between modules in castor fields of ten farmers from In BIPM module, other egg parasitoids like T. achaeae, the five villages (locations). Each farmer was treated as a replication. Castor crop was raised following recommended Telenomus sp. and Trissolcus sp. were also recorded from agronomic practices except plant protection. Under each A. janata eggs but none of them were recorded in CIPM IPM module, different components were imposed at module, non–IPM module 1 and 2. The egg parasitoid, different phenological stages of the crop based on economic Trichogramma evanescens Westwood, was recorded from threshold level (ETL) for castor semilooper (4–5 larvae S. litura eggs in BIPM module. plant-1), tobacco caterpillar (10–15% defoliation), capsule borer (10% capsule damage), wilt (15–20%) and Botrytis Larval parasitoids (10%) (Basappa, 2007). Among larval parasitoids, M. maculipennis on A. janata Pre– and post–treatment (1, 3 and 7 days after was found to be highly potential with field parasitization treatment) counts of number of M. maculipennis cocoons of 66.10, 21.2, 24.00 and 22.35% in BIPM, CIPM, and per plant were recorded. Effect of BIPM, CIPM and non– non–IPM module 1 and 2, respectively. Another larval IPM modules on potential egg and larval parasitoids was parasitoid, Euplectrus maternus Bhatnagar on A. janata studied by recording the per cent parasitization of 100 eggs parasitized 7.92, 2.40, 1.20 and 3.82% of A. janata larvae in and early instar larvae of A. janata and S. litura collected BIPM, CIPM, and non–IPM module 1 and 2, respectively. from the fields and reared in the laboratory at 27 + 1°C Similarly, average parasitization of larval parasitoids like and 65 + 5% relative humidity. Populations of important Charops obtusus Morley (on S. obliqua and A. janata), predators were recorded on 10 plants in 5 quadrats of 25 sq. m. in 0.4 ha area under each module.
Recommended publications
  • To Us Insectometers, It Is Clear That Insect Decline in Our Costa Rican

    To Us Insectometers, It Is Clear That Insect Decline in Our Costa Rican

    SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE To us insectometers, it is clear that insect decline in our Costa Rican tropics is real, so let’sbekindto SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE the survivors Daniel H. Janzena,1 and Winnie Hallwachsa Edited by David L. Wagner, University of Connecticut, and accepted by Editorial Board Member May R. Berenbaum November 11, 2020 (received for review April 6, 2020) We have been field observers of tropical insects on four continents and, since 1978, intense observers of caterpillars, their parasites, and their associates in the 1,260 km2 of dry, cloud, and rain forests of Area´ de Conservaci ´onGuanacaste (ACG) in northwestern Costa Rica. ACG’s natural ecosystem restoration began with its national park designation in 1971. As human biomonitors, or “insectometers,” we see that ACG’s insect species richness and density have gradually declined since the late 1970s, and more intensely since about 2005. The overarching perturbation is climate change. It has caused increasing ambient tempera- tures for all ecosystems; more erratic seasonal cues; reduced, erratic, and asynchronous rainfall; heated air masses sliding up the volcanoes and burning off the cloud forest; and dwindling biodiversity in all ACG terrestrial ecosystems. What then is the next step as climate change descends on ACG’s many small-scale successes in sustainable biodevelopment? Be kind to the survivors by stimulating and facilitating their owner societies to value them as legitimate members of a green sustainable nation. Encourage national bioliteracy, BioAlfa. climate change | BioAlfa | conservation by rewilding | biodevelopment | insect decline As “insectometers,” also known as human biomoni- eventually focused into Area´ de Conservaci ´onGuana- tors, we have watched the conspicuous ongoing de- caste (ACG) in northwestern Costa Rica (8–13) (Fig.
  • Natural Distribution of Parasitoids of Larvae of the Fall Armyworm, <I

    Natural Distribution of Parasitoids of Larvae of the Fall Armyworm, <I

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology Entomology, Department of 2009 Natural distribution of parasitoids of larvae of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, in Argentina M Gabriela Murua Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres, CONICET Jamie Molina Ochoa Universidad de Colima, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Patricio Fidalgo CRILAR Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub Part of the Entomology Commons Murua, M Gabriela; Ochoa, Jamie Molina; and Fidalgo, Patricio, "Natural distribution of parasitoids of larvae of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, in Argentina" (2009). Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology. 384. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub/384 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Journal of Insect Science: Vol. 9 | Article 20 Murúa et al. Natural distribution of parasitoids of larvae of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, in Argentina M. Gabriela Murúaa,b, Jaime Molina-Ochoac,d and Patricio Fidalgoe aEstación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres, Sección Zoología Agrícola, CC 9, Las Talitas (T4101XAC), Tucumán, Argentina bCONICET cUniversidad de Colima, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Km. 40, autopista Colima-Manzanillo, Tecomán, Colima (28100), México dDepartment of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0816, USA eCRILAR (CONICET), entre Ríos y Mendoza s/n, Anillaco (5301), La Rioja, Argentina Abstract To develop a better understanding of the natural distribution of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and to update the knowledge of the incidence of its complex of parasitoids.
  • Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

    Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

    Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Forest Health & Biosecurity Working Papers OVERVIEW OF FOREST PESTS INDONESIA January 2007 Forest Resources Development Service Working Paper FBS/19E Forest Management Division FAO, Rome, Italy Forestry Department Overview of forest pests - Indonesia DISCLAIMER The aim of this document is to give an overview of the forest pest1 situation in Indonesia. It is not intended to be a comprehensive review. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © FAO 2007 1 Pest: Any species, strain or biotype of plant, animal or pathogenic agent injurious to plants or plant products (FAO, 2004). ii Overview of forest pests - Indonesia TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1 Forest pests...................................................................................................................... 1 Naturally regenerating forests..................................................................................... 1 Insects ..................................................................................................................... 1 Diseases..................................................................................................................
  • Insects and Related Arthropods Associated with of Agriculture

    Insects and Related Arthropods Associated with of Agriculture

    USDA United States Department Insects and Related Arthropods Associated with of Agriculture Forest Service Greenleaf Manzanita in Montane Chaparral Pacific Southwest Communities of Northeastern California Research Station General Technical Report Michael A. Valenti George T. Ferrell Alan A. Berryman PSW-GTR- 167 Publisher: Pacific Southwest Research Station Albany, California Forest Service Mailing address: U.S. Department of Agriculture PO Box 245, Berkeley CA 9470 1 -0245 Abstract Valenti, Michael A.; Ferrell, George T.; Berryman, Alan A. 1997. Insects and related arthropods associated with greenleaf manzanita in montane chaparral communities of northeastern California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-167. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Dept. Agriculture; 26 p. September 1997 Specimens representing 19 orders and 169 arthropod families (mostly insects) were collected from greenleaf manzanita brushfields in northeastern California and identified to species whenever possible. More than500 taxa below the family level wereinventoried, and each listing includes relative frequency of encounter, life stages collected, and dominant role in the greenleaf manzanita community. Specific host relationships are included for some predators and parasitoids. Herbivores, predators, and parasitoids comprised the majority (80 percent) of identified insects and related taxa. Retrieval Terms: Arctostaphylos patula, arthropods, California, insects, manzanita The Authors Michael A. Valenti is Forest Health Specialist, Delaware Department of Agriculture, 2320 S. DuPont Hwy, Dover, DE 19901-5515. George T. Ferrell is a retired Research Entomologist, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 2400 Washington Ave., Redding, CA 96001. Alan A. Berryman is Professor of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6382. All photographs were taken by Michael A. Valenti, except for Figure 2, which was taken by Amy H.
  • Reproductive Biology and Longevity of Euplectrus Ronnai (Brèthes) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae)

    Reproductive Biology and Longevity of Euplectrus Ronnai (Brèthes) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae)

    July - September 2003 481 BIOLOGICAL CONTROL Reproductive Biology and Longevity of Euplectrus ronnai (Brèthes) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) ANA C. YAMAMOTO AND LUÍS A. FOERSTER Depto. Zoologia, UFPR. C. postal 19.020, 81531-990, Curitiba, PR, e-mail: [email protected] Neotropical Entomology 32(3):481-485 (2003) Biologia Reprodutiva e Longevidade de Euplectrus ronnai (Brèthes) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) RESUMO - O ectoparasitóide Euplectrus ronnai (Brèthes) é um dos componentes do complexo de espécies que parasitam a lagarta do trigo Mythimna (Pseudaletia) sequax Franclemont (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Não há dados na literatura sobre o potencial de parasitismo, preferência por ínstares do hospedeiro e longevidade desse parasitóide, o que motivou a realização do presente trabalho. O parasitismo ocorreu entre o terceiro e o quinto ínstares do hospedeiro; lagartas de segundo instar inviabilizaram o desenvolvimento do parasitóide, e no primeiro e no sexto ínstares não houve oviposição pelas fêmeas de E. ronnai. O número de ovos depositados pelas fêmeas aumentou com o estádio de desenvolvimento do hospedeiro, variando de 1,5 ovos/lagarta no terceiro instar a 3,6 ovos/lagarta no quinto ínstar. A proporção de lagartas parasitadas entre os diferentes ínstares mostrou que E. ronnai apresenta preferência pelo quarto e quinto ínstares de M. sequax. Não houve diferença no tempo de desenvolvimento, na razão sexual, no número médio de lagartas parasitadas e na porcentagem de lagartas parasitadas em testes de livre escolha entre lagartas de quarto e de quinto ínstares. Entretanto, o número de parasitóides/hospedeiro foi significativamente maior em lagartas de quinto ínstar. A fecundidade média das fêmeas de E. ronnai foi de 63,7 ovos e cada fêmea parasitou a média de 20,3 lagartas.
  • PACIFIC INSECTS MONOGRAPH Ll

    PACIFIC INSECTS MONOGRAPH Ll

    PACIFIC INSECTS MONOGRAPH ll Lepidoptera of American Samoa with particular reference to biology and ecology By John Adams Comstock Published by Entomology Department, Bernice P. Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawaii, U. S. A. 1966 PACIFIC INSECTS MONOGRAPHS Published by Entomology Department, Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96819, U. S. A. Editorial Committee: J. L. Gressitt, Editor (Honolulu), S. Asahina (Tokyo), R. G. Fennah (London), R. A. Harrison (Christchurch), T. C. Maa (Honolulu & Taipei), C. W. Sabrosky (Washington, D. C), R. L. Usinger (Berkeley), J. van der Vecht (Leiden), K. Yasumatsu (Fukuoka), E. C. Zimmerman (New Hampshire). Assistant Editors: P. D. Ashlock (Honolulu), Carol Higa (Honolulu), Naoko Kunimori (Fukuoka), Setsuko Nakata (Honolulu), Toshi Takata (Fukuoka). Business Manager: C. M. Yoshimoto (Honolulu). Business Assistant: Doris Anbe (Honolulu). Business Agent in Japan: K. Yasumatsu (Fukuoka). Entomological staff, Bishop Museum, 1966: Doris Anbe, Hatsuko Arakaki, P. D. Ashlock, S. Azuma, Madaline Boyes, Candida Cardenas, Ann Cutting, M. L. Goff, J. L. Gressitt (Chairman), J. Harrell, Carol Higa, Y. Hirashima, Shirley Hokama, E. Holzapfel, Dorothy Hoxie, Helen Hurd, June Ibara, Naoko Kuni­ mori, T. C. Maa, Grace Nakahashi, Setsuko Nakata (Adm. Asst.), Tulene Nonomura, Carol Okuma, Ka­ tharine Pigue, Linda Reineccius, T. Saigusa, I. Sakakibara, Judy Sakamoto, G. A. Samuelson, Sybil Seto, W. A. Steffan, Amy Suehiro, Grace Thompson, Clara Uchida, J. R. Vockeroth, Nixon Wilson, Mabel Ya- tsuoka, C. M. Yoshimoto, E. C. Zimmermann. Field associates: M. J. Fitzsimons, E. E. Gless, G. E. Lip- pert, V. Peckham, D. S. Rabor, J. Sedlacek, M. Sedlacek, P. Shanahan, R. Straatman, J. Strong, H. M. Tor- revillas, A.
  • Erebidae-Erebinae.Pdf

    Erebidae-Erebinae.Pdf

    Erebidae Erebinae Achaea janata (Linnaeus, 1758) Taxonomy: Phalaena janata Linnaeus, 1758; 527.– . Phalaena melicerta Drury, [1773]:46,. – India (Bombay). Noctua tigrina Fabricius, 1775. Noctua cyathina Macleay, 1826 . Catocala traversii Fereday, 1877. Ophiusa ekeikei Bethune-Baker, 1906. melicertoides Strand, 1914: 74. Imago melicertella Strand, 1914: 74. Achaea melicertoides Gaede, 1938. Achaea melicertella Gaede, 1938. Hostplant: Flight period: viii. Altitude: 460 m. Distribution map Erebidae Erebinae Achaea serva (Fabricius, 1775) Taxonomy: Noctua serva Fabricius, 1775. Achaea fasciculipes Walker, 1858. fuscosuffusa Strand, 1914: 73. Achaea fuscosuffusa Gaede, 1938. Hostplant: Flight period: ix. Altitude: 2900 m. Imago Distribution map Erebidae Erebinae Agonista hypoleuca Guenee, 1852 Taxonomy Hostplant Flight period Altitude Imago Male genitalia Distribution map Female genitalia Erebidae Erebinae Arcte polygrapha Kollar, 1844 Taxonomy: Arcte polygrapha Kollar, 1844± ./ In- dia (Himalaya) Hostplant Flight period: v, viii. Altitude: 460-1975 m. Imago Distribution map Erebidae Erebinae Artena dotata (Fabricius, 1794) Taxonomy: Noctua dotata Fabricius, 1794: 55.– E. India. Hostplant: Flight period: v-vi. Altitude: 1580-2020 m. Imago Distribution map Erebidae Erebinae Blepharidia griseirufa Hampson, 1894 Taxonomy Hostplant Flight period Altitude Imago Male genitalia Distribution map Female genitalia Erebidae Erebinae Capnodes caustiplaga Hampson, 1895 Taxonomy Hostplant Flight period Altitude Imago Male genitalia Distribution map Female genitalia Erebidae Erebinae Capnodes pustulifera Walker, 1864 Taxonomy Hostplant Flight period Altitude Imago Male genitalia Distribution map Female genitalia Erebidae Erebinae Catocala nupta (Linnaeus, 1767) Taxonomy: Phalaena nupta Linnaeus, 1767: 841.– Germany. Catocala unicuba Walker, [1858]:1210.– India. Hostplant: Populus, P. nigra, Salix, S. fragilis Flight period: ix. Altitude: 2900 m. Imago Distribution map Erebidae Erebinae Chrysopera combinans (Walker, 1858) Taxonomy: Achaea combinans Walker, 1858: 1399.- Ceylon.
  • Biology of Achaea Janata Linneaus on Castor and Rose N.K.S

    Biology of Achaea Janata Linneaus on Castor and Rose N.K.S

    Agric. Sci. Digest, 22 (3) : 213 - 214,2002 BIOLOGY OF ACHAEA JANATA LINNEAUS ON CASTOR AND ROSE N.K.S. Bhadauria, U.C. Singh and U.S. Dwivedi Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, JNKW Campus, Gwalior - 474 002, India ABSTRACT Biology ofAchaeajanata Linneaus was studied on the two principal hosts viz., castor and rose to find suitable host for development of this insect under laboratory conditions. Castor was found more suitable host than rose on the basis of more number of eggs, shorter larval and pupal period with lower larval and pupal mortality and higher per cent adult emergence. The castor semilooper, Achaeajanata with filter paper. The adults emerging on the (Lepidoptera: Noctuidati} is a serious pest of same day (Male, female) were paired and castor in many castor growing states of India. released for egg laying in oviposition cages (45 Besides castor, it feeds on different host plants x 45 x 45 cm). Honey sulution (5%) was like pomegranate, rose, dudhi etc. Food plants provided as foot to adults. Observations on play a vital role in the development, survival various developmental stages Le. eggs to adults and reproductive potential of insects (Painter, were recorded on both the hosts. Experiment 1951). The present contribution deals with was performed in four sets. the stYEIies on the biology of the pest on castor The number of eggs laid on castor was and rose. more (535.3 ± 26.8 egs/female) than rose The biology of castor semi looper was :(250.4 ± 12.5/female) (Table 1). Gaikwad studied in the laboratory.
  • Influence of Castor Genotypes with Different Wax Blooms on Oviposition

    Influence of Castor Genotypes with Different Wax Blooms on Oviposition

    Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2018; 7(5): 2711-2715 E-ISSN: 2278-4136 P-ISSN: 2349-8234 JPP 2018; 7(5): 2711-2715 Influence of castor genotypes with different wax Received: 01-07-2018 Accepted: 03-08-2018 blooms on oviposition preference of endolarval parasitoid Snellenius maculipennis (Szepligate) of K Chakkani Priya Acharya N.G. Ranga castor semilooper Achaea janata L Agricultural University, Lam, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India KV Hari Prasad K Chakkani Priya, KV Hari Prasad, NC Venkateswarlu and V Umamahesh Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Lam, Abstract Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India The A. janata larvae reared on susceptible genotype DPC-9 had significantly greater parasitisation by S. maculipennis than the moderately resistant genotype 48-1 and resistant genotype GCH-4 tested under no- NC Venkateswarlu choice, dual-choice and multi-choice conditions, suggesting that host genotypes plays a significant role in Acharya N.G. Ranga the effectiveness of S. maculipennis in parasitisation of A. janata larvae. The increased parasitism of A. Agricultural University, Lam, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India janata larvae by S. maculipennis on the susceptible genotype DPC-9 might be due to the fact that the host larvae was healthy on the susceptible genotype because lack of resistance to the herbivore. Percentage V Umamahesh parasitism was greater under no-choice condition as compared to that under multi-choice and dual choice Acharya N.G. Ranga conditions, which may be largely because of non-availability of alternate host plant to the females of S. Agricultural University, Lam, maculipennis in no choice condition. The genotype DPC-9 was hospitable to S.
  • Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Euphorbia Hirta

    Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Euphorbia Hirta

    Euphorbia hirta silver nanopaticles JBiopest 5(1): 1-6 JBiopest 7(Supp.): 54-66(2014) Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Euphorbia hirta (Euphorbiaceae) leaf extract against crop pest of cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) G. Durga Devi* K. Murugan and C. Panneer Selvam ABSTRACT Biosynthesis of insecticides from plant extracts is currently under exploitation. Plant extracts are very cost effective and eco-friendly and thus can be an economic and efficient alternative for the large-scale synthesis of synthetic and other chemical insecticides. So the present study was carried out to establish the larvicidal effect of synthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) using leaf extract of Euphorbia hirta (Euphorbiaceae) against the first to fourth instar larvae and pupae of the crop pest of cotton boll worm , Helicoverpa armigera. The production of the AgNPs synthesized using leaf extract of Euphorbia hirta was evaluated through a UV–Vis spectrophotometer in a wavelength range of 200 to 700 nm. An SEM micrograph showed 30- 60-nm-size aggregates of spherical- and cubic-shaped nanoparticles. EDX showed the complete chemical composition of the synthesized nanoparticles of silver. The results showed that the considerable larval mortality was found in the synthesized AgNPs against the I instar to IV instar larvae and pupae of Helicoverpa armigera. The leaf extract exhibited larval toxicity against the I instar to IV instar larvae and pupae of Helicoverpa armigera. The chi-square value was significant at p<0.05 level. Nanoparticle treatment showed toxicity against larval instars of Helicoverpa armigera and had impact on the biological parameters of Helicoverpa armigera.
  • Redalyc.Parasitism and Biological Aspects of Tetrastichus Howardi

    Redalyc.Parasitism and Biological Aspects of Tetrastichus Howardi

    Ciência Rural ISSN: 0103-8478 [email protected] Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brasil Hidalgo Barbosa, Rogério; Oliveira Kassab, Samir; Fagundes Pereira, Fabricio; Rossoni, Camila; Perassa Costa, Daniele; Avalo Berndt, Maykon Parasitism and biological aspects of Tetrastichus howardi (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) on Erinnyis ello (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) pupae Ciência Rural, vol. 45, núm. 2, febrero, 2015, pp. 185-188 Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Santa Maria, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33133798001 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Ciência Rural, Santa Maria,Parasitism v.45, n.2, and p.185-188, biological fev, aspects 2015 of Tetrastichus howardi (Hymenoptera: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20130896 Eulophidae) on... 185 ISSN 0103-8478 Parasitism and biological aspects of Tetrastichus howardi (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) on Erinnyis ello (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) pupae Parasitismo e aspectos biológicos de Tetrastichus howardi (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) em pupas de Erinnyis ello (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) Rogério Hidalgo BarbosaI* Samir Oliveira KassabI Fabricio Fagundes PereiraI, II Camila RossoniII Daniele Perassa CostaI Maykon Avalo BerndtII - NOTE - ABSTRACT Erinnyis ello (LINNAEUS, 1758) (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae), also known as Erinnyis ello is one of the main pests of the cassava crop, and its natural enemies including egg, caterpillar, and pupal “mandarová-da-mandioca” is one of the main pests of parasitoids. The aim of this study was to evaluate parasitism and the cassava crop (AGUIAR et al., 2010).
  • Pests of Gingelly, Castor, Mustard and Linseed

    Pests of Gingelly, Castor, Mustard and Linseed

    Lecture No 9 PESTS OF GINGELLY, CASTOR, MUSTARD AND LINSEED Pests of Gingelly Though a dozen pests attack gingelly, only leaf webber, gall fly and leaf hopper as vector are important and cause economic damage in gingelly. Major pests 1. Leaf webber Antigastra catalaunalis Pyralidae Lepidoptera 2. Sphinx moth Acherontia styx Sphingidae Lepidoptera 3. Gall fly Asphondylia sesami Cecidomyiidae Diptera 4. Leaf hopper Orosius albicinctus Cicadallidae Hemiptera 5. Pod bug Elasmolomus sordidus Lygaeidae Hemiptera Minor pests 6. Aphid Aphis gossypii Aphididae Hemiptera I. Leaf feeders 1. Leaf webber: Antigastra catalaunalis (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera) Distribution and status: India, Africa, South Europe, Malta, Burma, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Sri Lanka and U.S.S.R. Host range: Sesame, Antirrhinum and Duranta. Damage symptoms Larva webs the top leaves together and bore the tender shoots in the vegetative phase. Flowers and young capsules are bored at reproductive stage. Bionomics Moth is brown with yellowish brown wings. It lays eggs on tender parts of plants. The egg period is 4-5 days. Fully grown pale green larva with black head and dots all over the body measures 20 mm in length. The larval period is 11-16 days. It pupates in leaf folds in a white silken cocoon for 4-7 days. ETL: 2 webbed leaves/sq.m. (or) 10% damage. Management 1. Culture of sesame like EH7, 57, 84, 105, 106 and 156 should be encouraged as these are observed to be completely resistant against A. catalaunalis. 2. Dusting the crop with 2% parathion. 3. Spraying with dimethoate 30 EC 500 ml or methyl parathion 50 EC 500 ml or endosulfan 35 EC 1.25 L or carbaryl 50% WP I kg in 700 L water per hectare.