DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrative Taxonomy of New World Euplectrus Westwood

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrative Taxonomy of New World Euplectrus Westwood A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 485:Integrative 1–236 (2015) taxonomy of New World Euplectrus Westwood (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae)... 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.458.9124 MONOGRAPH http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Integrative taxonomy of New World Euplectrus Westwood (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae), with focus on 55 new species from Area de Conservación Guanacaste, northwestern Costa Rica Christer Hansson1,2, M. Alex Smith3, Daniel H. Janzen4, Winnie Hallwachs4 1 Scienti!c Associate, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom 2 Museum of Biology (Entomology), Lund University, Lund, Sweden 3 Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1 Canada 4 Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6018 USA Corresponding author: Christer Hansson ([email protected]) Academic editor: M. Engel | Received 12 December 2014 | Accepted 11 February 2015 | Published 10 March 2015 http://zoobank.org/F18CFD3D-1029-4E8A-A2E8-CEF1AFDBAC8F Citation: Hansson C, Smith AM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W (2015) Integrative taxonomy of New World Euplectrus Westwood (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae), with focus on 55 new species from Area de Conservación Guanacaste, northwestern Costa Rica. ZooKeys 485: 1–236. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.485.9124 Abstract 90 species of Euplectrus are treated: 55 newly described, all from Area de Conservación Guanacaste (ACG), and 35 previously described species, of which 20 occur in ACG. "ree of the previously described species (E. brasiliensis Ashmead, E. hircinus (Say), E. ronnai (Brèthes)) have unknown status, owing to missing or severely damaged type material. "e new species, all authored by C. Hansson, are: Euplectrus alejandro- valerioi, E. alexsmithi, E. alvarowillei, E. andybennetti, E. andydeansi, E. annettewalkerae, E. billbrowni, E. bobwhartoni, E. carlosarmientoi, E. carlrettenmeyeri, E. charlesmicheneri, E. charlesporteri, E. chrisdarlingi, E. chrisgrinteri, E. corriemoreauae, E. daveroubiki, E. davesmithi, E. davidwahli, E. dianariasae, E. don- quickei, E. eowilsoni, E. garygibsoni, E. gavinbroadi, E. gerarddelvarei, E. henrytownesi, E. howelldalyi, E. hugokonsi, E. iangauldi, E. jacklonginoi, E. jesusugaldei, E. jimwhit!eldi, E. jjrodriguezae, E. johnheratyi, E. johnlasallei, E. johnnoyesi, E. josefernandezi, E. lubomirmasneri, E. markshawi, E. mikegatesi, E. mike- schau#, E. mikesharkeyi, E. ninazitaniae, E. pammitchellae, E. paulhansoni, E. paulheberti, E. paulhurdi, E. philwardi, E. robbinthorpi, E. ronaldzunigai, E. roysnellingi, E. scottshawi, E. sondrawardae, E. sydneycam- eronae, E. victoriapookae, E. wonyoungchoi. "e species are described or redescribed, and thoroughly and uniformly illustrated, and included in two identi#cation keys, one for females and one for males. Lecto- types are designated for eight species: Euplectrus catocalae Howard (), E. junctus Gahan (), E. leucotro- Copyright Christer Hansson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 2 Christer Hansson et al. / ZooKeys 485: 1–236 (2015) phis Howard (), E. marginatus Ashmead (), E. pachyscaphus Girault (), E. platyhypenae Howard (), E. semimarginatus Girault (), Heteroscapus ronnai Brèthes (). One synonym is established: Euplectrus walteri Schau$ is a junior synonym of E. testaceipes (Cameron). Brief image notes and host records are provided on the natural history of the wasps as well as the details of their morphology. Hosts are known for 74 Euplectrus species. Keywords Chalcidoidea, Eulophinae, Euplectrini, DNA barcoding, Lepidoptera, gregarious caterpillar ectoparasi- toids, tropical biodiversity, Nearctic, Neotropical Table of contents Introduction ............................................................................................................. 4 Methods ................................................................................................................... 6 Results ...................................................................................................................... 8 Biology ................................................................................................................. 8 DNA barcodes ................................................................................................... 12 Taxonomy .............................................................................................................. 13 Key to females ................................................................................................ 14 Key to males .................................................................................................. 22 Species treatments – new species, all from ACG ................................................. 27 Euplectrus alejandrovalerioi Hansson, sp. n. .................................................... 27 Euplectrus alexsmithi Hansson, sp. n. .............................................................. 28 Euplectrus alvarowillei Hansson, sp. n. ............................................................ 29 Euplectrus andybennetti Hansson, sp. n. .......................................................... 30 Euplectrus andydeansi Hansson, sp. n. ............................................................. 31 Euplectrus annettewalkerae Hansson, sp. n. ..................................................... 32 Euplectrus billbrowni Hansson, sp. n. .............................................................. 33 Euplectrus bobwhartoni Hansson, sp. n. .......................................................... 34 Euplectrus carlosarmientoi Hansson, sp. n. ....................................................... 35 Euplectrus carlrettenmeyeri Hansson, sp. n. ...................................................... 37 Euplectrus charlesmicheneri Hansson, sp. n. ..................................................... 38 Euplectrus charlesporteri Hansson, sp. n. .......................................................... 39 Euplectrus chrisdarlingi Hansson, sp. n. ........................................................... 40 Euplectrus chrisgrinteri Hansson, sp. n. ........................................................... 41 Euplectrus corriemoreauae Hansson, sp. n. ....................................................... 42 Euplectrus daveroubiki Hansson, sp. n. ............................................................ 43 Euplectrus davesmithi Hansson, sp. n. ............................................................. 45 Euplectrus davidwahli Hansson, sp. n. ............................................................ 46 Euplectrus dianariasae Hansson, sp. n. ............................................................ 47 Euplectrus donquickei Hansson, sp. n. ............................................................. 48 Euplectrus eowilsoni Hansson, sp. n. ................................................................ 49 Euplectrus garygibsoni Hansson, sp. n. ............................................................. 52 Integrative taxonomy of New World Euplectrus Westwood (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae)... 3 Euplectrus gavinbroadi Hansson, sp. n. ........................................................... 53 Euplectrus gerarddelvarei Hansson, sp. n. ......................................................... 54 Euplectrus henrytownesi Hansson, sp. n. .......................................................... 55 Euplectrus howelldalyi Hansson, sp. n.............................................................. 56 Euplectrus hugokonsi Hansson, sp. n. ............................................................... 57 Euplectrus iangauldi Hansson, sp. n. ............................................................... 58 Euplectrus jacklonginoi Hansson, sp. n. ........................................................... 59 Euplectrus jesusugaldei Hansson, sp. n. ............................................................ 60 Euplectrus jimwhit!eldi Hansson, sp. n. .......................................................... 61 Euplectrus jjrodriguezae Hansson, sp. n. .......................................................... 63 Euplectrus johnheratyi Hansson, sp. n. ............................................................. 64 Euplectrus johnlasallei Hansson, sp. n. ............................................................. 65 Euplectrus johnnoyesi Hansson, sp. n. .............................................................. 66 Euplectrus josefernandezi Hansson, sp. n. ........................................................ 68 Euplectrus lubomirmasneri Hansson, sp. n. ...................................................... 69 Euplectrus markshawi Hansson, sp. n. ............................................................. 70 Euplectrus mikegatesi Hansson, sp. n. .............................................................. 71 Euplectrus mikeschau# Hansson, sp. n. ........................................................... 72 Euplectrus mikesharkeyi Hansson, sp. n. .......................................................... 74 Euplectrus ninazitaniae Hansson, sp. n. .......................................................... 75 Euplectrus pammitchellae Hansson, sp. n. ........................................................ 76 Euplectrus paulhansoni Hansson, sp. n. ........................................................... 77 Euplectrus
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recolecta De Artrópodos Para Prospección De La Biodiversidad En El Área De Conservación Guanacaste, Costa Rica
    Rev. Biol. Trop. 52(1): 119-132, 2004 www.ucr.ac.cr www.ots.ac.cr www.ots.duke.edu Recolecta de artrópodos para prospección de la biodiversidad en el Área de Conservación Guanacaste, Costa Rica Vanessa Nielsen 1,2, Priscilla Hurtado1, Daniel H. Janzen3, Giselle Tamayo1 & Ana Sittenfeld1,4 1 Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad (INBio), Santo Domingo de Heredia, Costa Rica. 2 Dirección actual: Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, 2060 San José, Costa Rica. 3 Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. 4 Dirección actual: Centro de Investigación en Biología Celular y Molecular, Universidad de Costa Rica. [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Recibido 21-I-2003. Corregido 19-I-2004. Aceptado 04-II-2004. Abstract: This study describes the results and collection practices for obtaining arthropod samples to be stud- ied as potential sources of new medicines in a bioprospecting effort. From 1994 to 1998, 1800 arthropod sam- ples of 6-10 g were collected in 21 sites of the Área de Conservación Guancaste (A.C.G) in Northwestern Costa Rica. The samples corresponded to 642 species distributed in 21 orders and 95 families. Most of the collections were obtained in the rainy season and in the tropical rainforest and dry forest of the ACG. Samples were obtained from a diversity of arthropod orders: 49.72% of the samples collected corresponded to Lepidoptera, 15.75% to Coleoptera, 13.33% to Hymenoptera, 11.43% to Orthoptera, 6.75% to Hemiptera, 3.20% to Homoptera and 7.89% to other groups.
    [Show full text]
  • To Us Insectometers, It Is Clear That Insect Decline in Our Costa Rican
    SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE To us insectometers, it is clear that insect decline in our Costa Rican tropics is real, so let’sbekindto SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE the survivors Daniel H. Janzena,1 and Winnie Hallwachsa Edited by David L. Wagner, University of Connecticut, and accepted by Editorial Board Member May R. Berenbaum November 11, 2020 (received for review April 6, 2020) We have been field observers of tropical insects on four continents and, since 1978, intense observers of caterpillars, their parasites, and their associates in the 1,260 km2 of dry, cloud, and rain forests of Area´ de Conservaci ´onGuanacaste (ACG) in northwestern Costa Rica. ACG’s natural ecosystem restoration began with its national park designation in 1971. As human biomonitors, or “insectometers,” we see that ACG’s insect species richness and density have gradually declined since the late 1970s, and more intensely since about 2005. The overarching perturbation is climate change. It has caused increasing ambient tempera- tures for all ecosystems; more erratic seasonal cues; reduced, erratic, and asynchronous rainfall; heated air masses sliding up the volcanoes and burning off the cloud forest; and dwindling biodiversity in all ACG terrestrial ecosystems. What then is the next step as climate change descends on ACG’s many small-scale successes in sustainable biodevelopment? Be kind to the survivors by stimulating and facilitating their owner societies to value them as legitimate members of a green sustainable nation. Encourage national bioliteracy, BioAlfa. climate change | BioAlfa | conservation by rewilding | biodevelopment | insect decline As “insectometers,” also known as human biomoni- eventually focused into Area´ de Conservaci ´onGuana- tors, we have watched the conspicuous ongoing de- caste (ACG) in northwestern Costa Rica (8–13) (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Distribution of Parasitoids of Larvae of the Fall Armyworm, <I
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology Entomology, Department of 2009 Natural distribution of parasitoids of larvae of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, in Argentina M Gabriela Murua Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres, CONICET Jamie Molina Ochoa Universidad de Colima, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Patricio Fidalgo CRILAR Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub Part of the Entomology Commons Murua, M Gabriela; Ochoa, Jamie Molina; and Fidalgo, Patricio, "Natural distribution of parasitoids of larvae of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, in Argentina" (2009). Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology. 384. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub/384 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Journal of Insect Science: Vol. 9 | Article 20 Murúa et al. Natural distribution of parasitoids of larvae of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, in Argentina M. Gabriela Murúaa,b, Jaime Molina-Ochoac,d and Patricio Fidalgoe aEstación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres, Sección Zoología Agrícola, CC 9, Las Talitas (T4101XAC), Tucumán, Argentina bCONICET cUniversidad de Colima, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Km. 40, autopista Colima-Manzanillo, Tecomán, Colima (28100), México dDepartment of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0816, USA eCRILAR (CONICET), entre Ríos y Mendoza s/n, Anillaco (5301), La Rioja, Argentina Abstract To develop a better understanding of the natural distribution of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and to update the knowledge of the incidence of its complex of parasitoids.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revolutionary Protocol to Describe Understudied Hyperdiverse Taxa
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift (Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift und Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift in Vereinigung) Jahr/Year: 2019 Band/Volume: NF_66 Autor(en)/Author(s): Meierotto Sarah, Sharkey Michael J., Janzen Daniel H., Hallwachs Winnie, Hebert Paul D. N., Chapman Eric G., Smith M. Alex Artikel/Article: A revolutionary protocol to describe understudied hyperdiverse taxa and overcome the taxonomic impediment 119-145 ©https://dez.pensoft.net/;Licence: CC BY 4.0 Dtsch. Entomol. Z. 66 (2) 2019, 119–145 | DOI 10.3897/dez.66.34683 A revolutionary protocol to describe understudied hyperdiverse taxa and overcome the taxonomic impediment Sarah Meierotto1, Michael J. Sharkey1, Daniel H. Janzen2, Winnie Hallwachs2, Paul D. N. Hebert3, Eric G. Chapman1, M. Alex Smith4 1 Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091, USA 2 Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6018, USA 3 Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada 4 Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada http://zoobank.org/FDA33662-0595-4AC1-B9BA-9F2C1311D114 Corresponding author: Sarah Meierotto ([email protected]); Michael J. Sharkey ([email protected]) Academic editor: D. Zimmermann ♦ Received 21 March 2019 ♦ Accepted 2 July 2019 ♦ Published 25 July 2019 Abstract Here we elucidate and justify a DNA barcode approach to insect species description that can be applied to name tens of thousands of species of Ichneumonoidea and many other species-rich taxa. Each description consists of a lateral habitus image of the specimen, a COI barcode diagnosis, and the holotype specimen information required by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects and Related Arthropods Associated with of Agriculture
    USDA United States Department Insects and Related Arthropods Associated with of Agriculture Forest Service Greenleaf Manzanita in Montane Chaparral Pacific Southwest Communities of Northeastern California Research Station General Technical Report Michael A. Valenti George T. Ferrell Alan A. Berryman PSW-GTR- 167 Publisher: Pacific Southwest Research Station Albany, California Forest Service Mailing address: U.S. Department of Agriculture PO Box 245, Berkeley CA 9470 1 -0245 Abstract Valenti, Michael A.; Ferrell, George T.; Berryman, Alan A. 1997. Insects and related arthropods associated with greenleaf manzanita in montane chaparral communities of northeastern California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-167. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Dept. Agriculture; 26 p. September 1997 Specimens representing 19 orders and 169 arthropod families (mostly insects) were collected from greenleaf manzanita brushfields in northeastern California and identified to species whenever possible. More than500 taxa below the family level wereinventoried, and each listing includes relative frequency of encounter, life stages collected, and dominant role in the greenleaf manzanita community. Specific host relationships are included for some predators and parasitoids. Herbivores, predators, and parasitoids comprised the majority (80 percent) of identified insects and related taxa. Retrieval Terms: Arctostaphylos patula, arthropods, California, insects, manzanita The Authors Michael A. Valenti is Forest Health Specialist, Delaware Department of Agriculture, 2320 S. DuPont Hwy, Dover, DE 19901-5515. George T. Ferrell is a retired Research Entomologist, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 2400 Washington Ave., Redding, CA 96001. Alan A. Berryman is Professor of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6382. All photographs were taken by Michael A. Valenti, except for Figure 2, which was taken by Amy H.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventaire Entomologique Des ZNIEFF De Martinique Et De La Réserve De La Caravelle
    Inventaire entomologique des ZNIEFF de Martinique et de la Réserve de la Caravelle Campagne de terrain 2014 TOUROULT Julien, POIRIER Eddy, BRAUD Julie, DEKNUYDT Francis, DUMBARDON-MARTIAL Eddy, MOULIN Nicolas, RAMAGE Thibault & ROMÉ Daniel Rapport SEAG 2015-1 Maître d'ouvrage : Touroult et al. 2015. Inventaire entomologique des ZNIEFF de Martinique. Rapport SEAG Résumé Dans la poursuite des inventaires menés depuis 2011, l'entomofaune de six sites situés dans le secteur de la Presqu'île de la Caravelle ont été échantillonnés en 2014. Il s'agit de cinq zones naturelles d'intérêt écologique, faunistique et floristique (ZNIEFF) et de la réserve naturelle de la Caravelle. Des techniques de collecte variées (pièges d'interception, piège lumineux, pièges aériens, recherche active et mise en émergence) ont été utilisées durant une mission de terrain de 20 jours en mai 2014 et complétées par une phase de terrain en septembre comprenant des techniques complémentaires (piège Malaise et assiettes jaunes en particulier). Au total 7 900 spécimens pour 380 espèces ont été déterminés par un ensemble de 27 spécialistes. Géographiquement proches, l'ensemble de ces sites possède un fonds de faune assez homogène, composé d'espèces de forêts sèches et d'espèces ubiquistes. Les analyses se sont appuyées sur la liste des insectes déterminants de ZNIEFF en Martinique, des espèces à la fois bien connues, endémiques et généralement localisées. La réserve de la Caravelle et la ZNIEFF 12 de Bois Pothau apparaissent comme les 2 sites les plus intéressants au regard de ces espèces déterminantes. La ZNIEFF 02 (Morne Régale, Pointe Batterie) s'est également révélée riche en espèces dont de nombreux endémiques.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Biology and Longevity of Euplectrus Ronnai (Brèthes) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae)
    July - September 2003 481 BIOLOGICAL CONTROL Reproductive Biology and Longevity of Euplectrus ronnai (Brèthes) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) ANA C. YAMAMOTO AND LUÍS A. FOERSTER Depto. Zoologia, UFPR. C. postal 19.020, 81531-990, Curitiba, PR, e-mail: [email protected] Neotropical Entomology 32(3):481-485 (2003) Biologia Reprodutiva e Longevidade de Euplectrus ronnai (Brèthes) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) RESUMO - O ectoparasitóide Euplectrus ronnai (Brèthes) é um dos componentes do complexo de espécies que parasitam a lagarta do trigo Mythimna (Pseudaletia) sequax Franclemont (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Não há dados na literatura sobre o potencial de parasitismo, preferência por ínstares do hospedeiro e longevidade desse parasitóide, o que motivou a realização do presente trabalho. O parasitismo ocorreu entre o terceiro e o quinto ínstares do hospedeiro; lagartas de segundo instar inviabilizaram o desenvolvimento do parasitóide, e no primeiro e no sexto ínstares não houve oviposição pelas fêmeas de E. ronnai. O número de ovos depositados pelas fêmeas aumentou com o estádio de desenvolvimento do hospedeiro, variando de 1,5 ovos/lagarta no terceiro instar a 3,6 ovos/lagarta no quinto ínstar. A proporção de lagartas parasitadas entre os diferentes ínstares mostrou que E. ronnai apresenta preferência pelo quarto e quinto ínstares de M. sequax. Não houve diferença no tempo de desenvolvimento, na razão sexual, no número médio de lagartas parasitadas e na porcentagem de lagartas parasitadas em testes de livre escolha entre lagartas de quarto e de quinto ínstares. Entretanto, o número de parasitóides/hospedeiro foi significativamente maior em lagartas de quinto ínstar. A fecundidade média das fêmeas de E. ronnai foi de 63,7 ovos e cada fêmea parasitou a média de 20,3 lagartas.
    [Show full text]
  • BUTTERFLIES in Thewest Indies of the Caribbean
    PO Box 9021, Wilmington, DE 19809, USA E-mail: [email protected]@focusonnature.com Phone: Toll-free in USA 1-888-721-3555 oror 302/529-1876302/529-1876 BUTTERFLIES and MOTHS in the West Indies of the Caribbean in Antigua and Barbuda the Bahamas Barbados the Cayman Islands Cuba Dominica the Dominican Republic Guadeloupe Jamaica Montserrat Puerto Rico Saint Lucia Saint Vincent the Virgin Islands and the ABC islands of Aruba, Bonaire, and Curacao Butterflies in the Caribbean exclusively in Trinidad & Tobago are not in this list. Focus On Nature Tours in the Caribbean have been in: January, February, March, April, May, July, and December. Upper right photo: a HISPANIOLAN KING, Anetia jaegeri, photographed during the FONT tour in the Dominican Republic in February 2012. The genus is nearly entirely in West Indian islands, the species is nearly restricted to Hispaniola. This list of Butterflies of the West Indies compiled by Armas Hill Among the butterfly groupings in this list, links to: Swallowtails: family PAPILIONIDAE with the genera: Battus, Papilio, Parides Whites, Yellows, Sulphurs: family PIERIDAE Mimic-whites: subfamily DISMORPHIINAE with the genus: Dismorphia Subfamily PIERINAE withwith thethe genera:genera: Ascia,Ascia, Ganyra,Ganyra, Glutophrissa,Glutophrissa, MeleteMelete Subfamily COLIADINAE with the genera: Abaeis, Anteos, Aphrissa, Eurema, Kricogonia, Nathalis, Phoebis, Pyrisitia, Zerene Gossamer Wings: family LYCAENIDAE Hairstreaks: subfamily THECLINAE with the genera: Allosmaitia, Calycopis, Chlorostrymon, Cyanophrys,
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Skippers of the Afrotropical Region
    BUTTERFLIES AND SKIPPERS OF THE AFROTROPICAL REGION AN ENCYCLOPAEDIA © 13th edition (2014) 1 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF AFROTROPICAL PAPILIONOIDEA AND HESPERIOIDEA (complete from 1973 to 2013) E-mail: [email protected] This file contains references to publications that refer specifically to butterflies and skippers in the Afrotropical Region. * Indicates that a PDF of this publication is in my possession. ABERLENC, H.P., ANDRIAMAMPIANINA, L., FAURE, E., LEES, D.C., MINET, J., OIVIER, L., RAFAMANTANANTSOA, C., RANDRIANANDRASANA, M. & RAZAFINDRAKOTOMAMONJY, A. 2007. Le Radeau des Cimes au Parc national de Masoala (Madagascar). Premiere partie: elements pour un inventaire des Lepidopteres. Bulletin Mensuel de la Societe Linneene de Lyon 76 (6): 141-154. [Checklist] ABU YAMAN, I.K. 1973. Biological studies on the citrus leaf caterpillar, Papilio demodocus Esp. (Lepid., Papilionidae) in Saudi Arabia. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 72 (1-4): 376-383. *ACKERY, P.R. 1987. Diversity and phantom competition in African Acraeine butterflies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society of London 30: 291-297. ACKERY, P.R. 1988. Biocontrol potential of African lycaenid butterflies entomophagous on Homoptera. Revue de Zoologie Africaine 107: 581-591. ACKERY, P.R. 1990. Biocontrol potential of African lycaenid butterflies entomophagous on Homoptera. Journal of African Zoology 104 (6): 581-591. [Lycaenidae, Miletinae] 2 *ACKERY, P.R. 1991. Host plant utilization by African and Australian butterflies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 44 (4): 335-351. [Papilionoidea] ACKERY, P.R. 2002. Emin Pasha‟s butterflies – a case for Casati?. Archives of Natural History 29 (3): 347-352. [Papilionoidea] ACKERY, P.R., GOODGER, K., & LEES, D. 2002. The Burgermeister‟s butterfly.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Legume-feeding Lepidoptera of the Florida Keys: potential competitors of an endangered lycaenid butterfly Sarah R. Steele Cabrera1,2,*, James E. Hayden3, Jaret C. Daniels1,2, Jake M. Farnum4, Charles V. Covell Jr.1, and Matthew J. Standridge1 Abstract Two Fabaceae in the Florida Keys, Pithecellobium keyense Coker and Guilandina bonduc Griseb., have been of interest because they are the larval host plants for the endangered Miami blue butterfly (Cyclargus thomasi bethunebakeri [Comstock & Huntington]; Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). As a part of ongoing research and conservation for this butterfly, wild host plant material has been periodically collected in order to supplement a captive colony ofC. t. bethunebakeri located in Gainesville, Florida, USA. In examining this plant material, 26 lepidopterans were detected, includ- ing several host records, a new continental record, and 2 likely undescribed species, 1 Aristotelia (Gelechiidae) and 1 Crocidosema (Tortricidae). Our results expand the geographic, life-history, and taxonomic understanding of lepidopteran herbivores that use P. keyense and G. bonduc in South Florida. Key Words: Pithecellobium keyense; Guilandina bonduc; Fabaceae; herbivory Resumen En los Cayos de Florida, habitan dos especies de plantas hospederas críticas para el ciclo de vida de la mariposa Miami blue (Cyclargus thomasi bethunebakeri [Comstock y Huntington]; Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), la cual está en peligro de extinción. Ambas plantas son de la familia Fabaceae: Pithecellobium keyense Coker y Guilandina bonduc Griseb. Como parte de una investigación de la conservación de esta mariposa, periódicamente se recolectaron muestras de estas especies de plantas para suplementar una población cautiva deC. t. bethunebakeri en Gainesville, Florida, EE. UU. Tras examinar el material vegetal colectado, encontramos veintiséis especies de Lepidópteros.
    [Show full text]
  • Geo-Eco-Trop., 2014, 38, 2 : 339-372
    Geo-Eco-Trop., 2014, 38, 2 : 339-372 Human consumption of Lepidoptera in Africa : an updated chronological list of references (370 quoted!) with their ethnozoological analysis La consommation humaine de Lépidoptères en Afrique : une liste chronologique actualisée des références (370 citées !) avec leur analyse ethnozoologique François MALAISSE1 & Paul LATHAM2 Résumé : La consommation humaine d’insectes ou “lépideroptérophagie” connaît un intérêt croissant. Dans le présent article 370 références abordant ce thème pour l’Afrique sont citées. Des accès à cette information par ordre chronologique ainsi que par ordre alphabétique des noms d’auteurs sont fournies. Une liste systématique des noms scientifiques des espèces consommées en Afrique est encore établie. L’importance de l’information disponible pour divers groupes ethnolinguistiques est signalée. L’évolution des thèmes approchés est analysée et commentée. Mots clés: Consommation, Lépidoptères, Afrique, Campéophagie. Abstract : Human consumption of insects or « lepidopterophagy » is becoming increasingly important. In the present paper 370 references dealing with this subject in Africa are quoted. Access to this information is provided both, by chronological and alphabetic order of authors. A systematic list of scientific names of edible Lepidoptera in Africa is also provided. The importance of the information available for various ethnolinguidstic groups is presented. The evolution of issues covered is analyzed and discussed. Keywords : Consumption, Lepidoptera, Africa, Campeophagy. INTRODUCTION The utilization of insects as a sustainable and secure source of animal-based food for the human diet has continued to increase in popularity in recent years (SHOCKLEY & DOSSEY, 2014). In particular, human consumption of Lepidoptera receives an increasing interest (MALAISSE et al., 2015). Several terms have been suggested to describe this consumption, notably regarding caterpillars, “campeophagy” (MALAISSE, 2002, 2004; MALAISSE et al.
    [Show full text]
  • WORLD LIST of EDIBLE INSECTS 2015 (Yde Jongema) WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY PAGE 1
    WORLD LIST OF EDIBLE INSECTS 2015 (Yde Jongema) WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY PAGE 1 Genus Species Family Order Common names Faunar Distribution & References Remarks life Epeira syn nigra Vinson Nephilidae Araneae Afregion Madagascar (Decary, 1937) Nephilia inaurata stages (Walck.) Nephila inaurata (Walckenaer) Nephilidae Araneae Afr Madagascar (Decary, 1937) Epeira nigra Vinson syn Nephila madagscariensis Vinson Nephilidae Araneae Afr Madagascar (Decary, 1937) Araneae gen. Araneae Afr South Africa Gambia (Bodenheimer 1951) Bostrichidae gen. Bostrichidae Col Afr Congo (DeFoliart 2002) larva Chrysobothris fatalis Harold Buprestidae Col jewel beetle Afr Angola (DeFoliart 2002) larva Lampetis wellmani (Kerremans) Buprestidae Col jewel beetle Afr Angola (DeFoliart 2002) syn Psiloptera larva wellmani Lampetis sp. Buprestidae Col jewel beetle Afr Togo (Tchibozo 2015) as Psiloptera in Tchibozo but this is Neotropical Psiloptera syn wellmani Kerremans Buprestidae Col jewel beetle Afr Angola (DeFoliart 2002) Psiloptera is larva Neotropicalsee Lampetis wellmani (Kerremans) Steraspis amplipennis (Fahr.) Buprestidae Col jewel beetle Afr Angola (DeFoliart 2002) larva Sternocera castanea (Olivier) Buprestidae Col jewel beetle Afr Benin (Riggi et al 2013) Burkina Faso (Tchinbozo 2015) Sternocera feldspathica White Buprestidae Col jewel beetle Afr Angola (DeFoliart 2002) adult Sternocera funebris Boheman syn Buprestidae Col jewel beetle Afr Zimbabwe (Chavanduka, 1976; Gelfand, 1971) see S. orissa adult Sternocera interrupta (Olivier) Buprestidae Col jewel beetle Afr Benin (Riggi et al 2013) Cameroun (Seignobos et al., 1996) Burkina Faso (Tchimbozo 2015) Sternocera orissa Buquet Buprestidae Col jewel beetle Afr Botswana (Nonaka, 1996), South Africa (Bodenheimer, 1951; syn S. funebris adult Quin, 1959), Zimbabwe (Chavanduka, 1976; Gelfand, 1971; Dube et al 2013) Scarites sp. Carabidae Col ground beetle Afr Angola (Bergier, 1941), Madagascar (Decary, 1937) larva Acanthophorus confinis Laporte de Cast.
    [Show full text]