DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 1/Monday, January 3, 2000/Rules

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 1/Monday, January 3, 2000/Rules Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 1 / Monday, January 3, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 19 Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its agencies to evaluate existing technical definitions, open burning, and criminal actions concerning SIPs on such standards when developing a new penalties. grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. regulation. To comply with NTTAA, (i) Incorporation by reference. E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246, 256±66 (1976); 42 EPA must consider and use ``voluntary (A) Board order issued on October 31, U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). consensus standards'' (VCS) if available 1997 by the Montana Board of Environmental Review approving the F. Unfunded Mandates and applicable when developing programs and policies unless doing so amendments to Missoula County Air Under section 202 of the Unfunded would be inconsistent with applicable Quality Control Program Chapters IX Mandates Reform Act of 1995 law or otherwise impractical. and XII regarding general definitions, (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed The EPA believes that VCS are open burning, and criminal penalties. into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must inapplicable to this action. Today's (B) Missoula County Air Quality prepare a budgetary impact statement to action does not require the public to Control Program, Chapter IX, Rule 701, accompany any proposed or final rule perform activities conducive to the use General Definitions, effective October that includes a Federal mandate that of VCS. 31, 1997. may result in estimated costs to State, (C) Missoula County Air Quality local, or tribal governments in the I. Petitions for Judicial Review Control Program, Chapter IX, Rules aggregate; or to the private sector, of Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 1301±1311, regarding open burning, $100 million or more. Under section Air act, petitions for judicial review of effective October 31, 1997. (D) Missoula County Air Quality 205, EPA must select the most cost- this action must be filed in the United Control Program, Chapter XII, Criminal effective and least burdensome States Court of Appeals for the Penalties, effective October 31, 1997. alternative that achieves the objectives appropriate circuit by March 3, 2000. of the rule and is consistent with Filing a petition for reconsideration by [FR Doc. 99±33622 Filed 12±30±99; 8:45 am] statutory requirements. Section 203 the Administrator of this final rule does BILLING CODE 6560±50±P requires EPA to establish a plan for not affect the finality of this rule for the informing and advising any small purposes of judicial review nor does it governments that may be significantly extend the time within which a petition ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION or uniquely impacted by the rule. for judicial review may be filed, and AGENCY EPA has determined that the approval shall not postpone the effectiveness of action promulgated does not include a such rule or action. This action may not 40 CFR Part 300 Federal mandate that may result in be challenged later in proceedings to [FRL±6517±1] estimated costs of $100 million or more enforce its requirements. (See section to either State, local, or tribal 307(b)(2).) National Oil and Hazardous governments in the aggregate, or to the Substances Pollution Contingency private sector. This Federal action List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Plan List Update approves pre-existing requirements Environmental protection, Air under State or local law, and imposes AGENCY: Environmental Protection pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Agency. not new requirements. Accordingly, no Hydrocarbons, Incorporation by ACTION: Notice of deletion of the PAB additional costs to State, local, or tribal reference, Intergovernmental relations, Oil and Chemical Services, Inc. governments, or to the private sector, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, Superfund Site from the National result from this action. and Reporting and recordkeeping Priorities List (NPL). G. Submission to Congress and the requirements. Comptroller General Dated: November 30, 1999. SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection The Congressional Review Act, 5 Max H. Dodson, Agency (EPA) Region 6 announces the U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Acting Regional Administrator, Region VIII. deletion of the PAB Oil and Chemical Business Regulatory Enforcement Services, Inc. Superfund Site (the Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of ``Site'') located in Vermilion Parish, that before a rule may take effect, the Federal Regulations is amended as Louisiana from the National Priorities agency promulgating the rule must follows: List (NPL). The NPL, promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of the submit a rule report, which includes a PART 52Ð[AMENDED] copy of the rule, to each House of Comprehensive Environmental Congress and to the Comptroller General 1. The authority citation for part 52 Response, Compensation, and Liability of the United States. EPA will submit a continues to read as follows: Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 9605, is codified at Appendix B report containing this rule and other Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. required information to the U.S. Senate, to the National Oil and Hazardous the U. S. House of Representatives, and Subpart BBÐMontana Substances Pollution Contingency Plan the Comptroller General of the United (NCP), 40 CFR Part 300. With the States prior to publication of the rule in 2. Section 52.1370 is amended by concurrence of the State of Louisiana the Federal Register. A major rule adding paragraph (c)(48) to read as through the Louisiana Department of cannot take effect until 60 days after it follows: Environmental Quality (LDEQ), EPA has determined that responsible parties is published in the Federal Register. § 52.1370 Identification of plan. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as have implemented all appropriate defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). * * * * * response actions required at the Site. (c) * * * Moreover, EPA with the concurrence of H. National Technology Transfer and (48) The Governor of Montana the State of Louisiana through the Advancement Act submitted revisions to the Missoula LDEQ, has determined that Site Section 12 of the National Technology County Air Quality Control Program investigations show that the Site now Transfer and Advancement Act with a letter dated November 14, 1997. poses no significant threat to public (NTTAA) of 1995 requires Federal The revisions address general health or the environment. VerDate 15-DEC-99 09:13 Dec 30, 1999 Jkt 190000 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03JAR1.XXX pfrm07 PsN: 03JAR1 20 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 1 / Monday, January 3, 2000 / Rules and Regulations Consequently, pursuant to CERCLA Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. Background 9601±9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, Section 105, and 40 CFR 300.425(e), the The bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) Site is hereby deleted from the NPL. 1991 Comp., p.351; E.O. 12580, 52 R 2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p.193. is a large mammal (family Bovidae) EFFECTIVE DATE: January 3, 2000. originally described by Shaw in 1804 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Appendix BÐ[Amended] (Wilson and Reeder 1993). Several Caroline A. Ziegler, Remedial Project 2. Table 1 of Appendix B to Part 300 subspecies of bighorn sheep have been Manager, (214) 665±2178, United States is amended by removing the site for recognized on the basis of geography Environmental Protection Agency, PAB Oil & Chemical Service, Inc., and differences in skull measurements Region 6, Mail Code: 6SF±LP, 1445 Ross Abbeville, Louisiana. (Cowan 1940; Buechner 1960). These Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202±2733. subspecies of bighorn sheep, as Information on the Site is available at [FR Doc. 99±33952 Filed 12±30±99; 8:45 am] described in these early works, include the local information repository located BILLING CODE 6560±50±P O. c. cremnobates (Peninsular bighorn at: Vermilion Parish Public Library, 200 sheep), O. c. nelsoni (Nelson bighorn N. Magdalen Square, Abbeville, sheep), O. c. mexicana (Mexican Louisiana 70511, (318) 893±2674. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR bighorn sheep), O. c. weemsi (Weems Requests for comprehensive copies of bighorn sheep), O. c. californiana documents should be directed formally Fish and Wildlife Service (California bighorn sheep), and O. c. to the Regional Superfund Management canadensis (Rocky Mountain bighorn Branch, c/o Steve Wyman, (214) 665± 50 CFR Part 17 sheep). However, recent genetic studies 2792, United States Environmental question the validity of some of these Protection Agency, Region 6, Mail Code: RIN 1018±AF59 subspecies and suggest a need to re- 6SF±PO, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, evaluate overall bighorn sheep Texas 75202±2733. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife taxonomy. For example, Sierra Nevada SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The site to and Plants; Final Rule To List the bighorn sheep appear to be more closely be deleted from the NPL is the PAB Oil Sierra Nevada Distinct Population related to desert bighorn sheep than the and Chemical Services, Inc. Superfund Segment of the California Bighorn O. c. californiana found in British Site located near Abbeville in Vermilion Sheep as Endangered Columbia (Ramey 1991, 1993). Parish, Louisiana. A Notice of Intent to AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Regardless, the Sierra Nevada bighorn Delete for the Site was published Interior. sheep meets our criteria for August 31, 1999. The closing date for consideration as a distinct vertebrate ACTION: Final rule. comments on the Notice of Intent to population segment (as discussed Delete was September 30, 1999. EPA SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and below) and is treated as such in this received no comments and therefore no Wildlife Service (Service), determine final rule. Responsiveness Summary was prepared. endangered status pursuant to the The historical range of the Sierra The EPA identifies sites which Endangered Species Act of 1973, as Nevada bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis present a significant risk to public amended (Act) for the Sierra Nevada californiana) includes the eastern slope health, welfare, or the environment and distinct population segment of of the Sierra Nevada, and, for at least maintains the NPL as the list of those California bighorn sheep (Ovis one subpopulation, a portion of the sites.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The ANZA-BORREGO DESERT REGION MAP and Many Other California Trail Maps Are Available from Sunbelt Publications. Please See
    SUNBELT WHOLESALE BOOKS AND MAPS CALIFORNIA TRAIL MAPS www.sunbeltpublications.com ANZA-BORREGO DESERT REGION ANZA-BORREGO DESERT REGION MAP 6TH EDITION 3RD EDITION ISBN: 9780899977799 Retail: $21.95 ISBN: 9780899974019 Retail: $9.95 Publisher: WILDERNESS PRESS Publisher: WILDERNESS PRESS AREA: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AREA: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA The Anza-Borrego and Western Colorado Desert A convenient map to the entire Anza-Borrego Desert Region is a vast, intriguing landscape that harbors a State Park and adjacent areas, including maps for rich variety of desert plants and animals. Prepare for Ocotillo Wells SRVA, Bow Willow Area, and Coyote adventure with this comprehensive guidebooks, Moutnains, it shows roads and hiking trails, diverse providing everything from trail logs and natural history points of interest, and general topography. Trip to a Desert Directory of agencies, accommodations, numbers are keyed to the Anza-Borrego Desert Region and facilities. It is the perfect companion for hikers, guide book by the same authors. campers, off-roaders, mountain bikers, equestrians, history buffs, and casual visitors. The ANZA-BORREGO DESERT REGION MAP and many other California trail maps are available from Sunbelt Publications. Please see the following listing for titles and details. s: catalogs\2018 catalogs\18-CA TRAIL MAPS.doc (800) 626-6579 Fax (619) 258-4916 Page 1 of 7 SUNBELT WHOLESALE BOOKS AND MAPS CALIFORNIA TRAIL MAPS www.sunbeltpublications.com ANGEL ISLAND & ALCATRAZ ISLAND BISHOP PASS TRAIL MAP TRAIL MAP ISBN: 9780991578429 Retail: $10.95 ISBN: 9781877689819 Retail: $4.95 AREA: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AREA: NORTHERN CALIFORNIA An extremely useful map for all outdoor enthusiasts who These two islands, located in San Francisco Bay are want to experience the Bishop Pass in one handy map.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution, Status, and Origin of Water Pipits Breeding in California ’
    The Condor89:788-797 0 The CooperOrnithological Society 1987 DISTRIBUTION, STATUS, AND ORIGIN OF WATER PIPITS BREEDING IN CALIFORNIA ’ JON H. MILLER 1034 ShattuckAvenue, Berkeley, CA 94707 MICHAEL T. GREEN Department of Biology, Universityof North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Abstract. We investigatedthe racial identity, distribution, and abundanceof WaterPipits (Anthusspinoletta) breeding in the mountainsof California.This commonnesting species of alpinetundra was not knownto breedin Californiauntil the 1970s;a reviewof historical evidencesuggests recent colonization. Mensural and plumagecomparisons show California populationsto be A. s. alticola, the breedingrace of the Rocky Mountains. This is of biogeographicalinterest, because the abundantwintering and migratorypipit of California is A. s. pacificus,while alticola normally occurshundreds of miles to the east.Water Pipits currentlynest in mesicalpine vegetation throughout much of the southernand centralSierra Nevada.Breeding densities are highestand mostuniform in the southernmostpart of this range.The only known breedingpopulation in California outsideof the Sierra Nevada occurson San Gorgonio Mountain in southernCalifornia. We hypothesizethat the previous absenceor rarity of breeding Water Pipits in the Sierra Nevada may be attributable to the most recentpaleoclimatic xerothermic period, the Hypsithermal(ca. 5,000 to 2,900 years BP), whichimuoverished many alnine biotasof arctic-oldcordilleran affinitv. Climate and habitat differencesmay prevenipa$cus from breedingin California, and geographicbarriers may have hindered colonization by alticola. The occurrenceand timing of the present colonizationmay be fortuitous.Alternatively, it is possiblethat prior colonizationof Great Basinranges by alticola facilitatedeventual dispersal to the SierraNevada. Key words: Water Pipit; Anthus spinoletta;Sierra Nevada;historical status; colonization; biogeography;alpine. INTRODUCTION and Montana (Verbeek 1970; Miller and Green, The Water Pipit (Anthus spinoletta) is a principal pers.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall Color Guide
    P M P M P C 6 B . 9 o i O O O s o a 0 Why do leaves u h n m . n EASTERN HIGH SIERRA N B B D o o t m p . y o o r C M o x x a A o o w turn color? t 6 4 a f h r u e 0 8 e i n n I r 3 , a L n t , M N a S y y M C C k t o , e very autumn, cottonwood, quaking a r T r h e t I e m a n o a o s n e m . aspen and willow are transformed into u S m m d t C S r T , m - e C i o o FALL b O B colorful hues of gold, orange and russet. s p C o t u e - E m 1 h i e t 1 s r r 5 h n Before long, their leaves will fall and again 8 h i L s d o a o L a m e f p become part of another cycle that feeds the n k a n , d C e k c a C s soil. What causes this yearly cycle, and what e o e F , n s A m , , i C d l determines which color the leaves turn? C C m m 9 A R A 3 A COLOR During spring and summer, leaves e 5 9 e C 9 r 1 9 3 c c o 3 4 actively produce foods necessary for plant 3 5 r e 5 m e 5 4 2 4 6 a m growth.
    [Show full text]
  • PCT Brochure
    Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail U.S. Forest Service Pacific Crest Trail California/Oregon/Washington Department of Agriculture National Scenic Trail • Mexico to Canada Princeton Vancouver V 1 C A A N A N Chilliwack 3 EC Manning D A • 500 Miles C Cathedral Washington O 49 ° 99 Provincial U Abbotsford Park Provincial V B Park E R I T I S Osoyoos This section begins at the Bridge of the Gods (elev. 180'), on the Columbia River and ends at R H C O L U M B NORTH I A Monument 78 on the Canadian border (elev. 4,240'). An additional seven miles were added I MOUNT Pasayten Wilderness S CASCADES beyond the border by the Canadian government to provide access to Highway 3 in British L A Bellingham NATIONAL Columbia’s Manning Provincial Park (elev. 3,800'). N D PARK Valesco Joe” “Samuri Joe S T OKANOGAN- R A Starting with a lengthy climb out of the Columbia River Gorge, the trail eventually reaches I T Stephen Cape O Victoria BAKER- Flattery F 20 Mather 20 the crest near the Indian Heaven Wilderness, a lake-filled land abounding with huckleberries. J U A N Wilderness Mount Vernon Next, it rounds the base of mammoth D E F U C Mount Adams (elev. 12,276'). Just north A WENATCHEE Omak Stehekin 48 ° 5 SNOQUALMIE 20 lies the dramatically rugged Goat Port Angeles Glacier Peak Rocks Wilderness and a traverse of the Lake Chelan 153 Davis Connie National Recreation Packwood Glacier. Wilderness Area 97 OLYMPIC NATIONAL The PCT’s northern terminus The trail crosses Highway 12 at White Pass Everett NATIONAL D before encountering dozens of lakes in NATIONAL N U Henry M Jackson the William O.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Emigrant Basin Primitive Area, California
    Mineral Resources of the Emigrant Basin Primitive Area, California By E. W. TOOKER, H. T. MORRIS, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, and PAUL V. FILLO, U.S. BUREAU OF MINES With a section on GEOPHYSICAL STUDIES By H. W. OLIVER, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS PRIMITIVE AREAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1261-G An evaluation of the mineral potential of a part of the central Sierra Nevada UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1970 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 In accordance with the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, Sept. 3,1964) and the Conference Report on Senate bill 4, 88th Congress, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines are making mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially designated as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe," when the act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System. Areas classed as "primi­ tive" were not included in the Wilderness System, but the act provides that each primitive area should be studied for its suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. This bulletin reports the results of a mineral survey in the Emigrant Basin primitive area, California. The area discussed in the report corresponds to the area under consideration for wilderness status. It is not identical with the original Emigrant Basin Primi­ tive Area as defined because modifications of the bound­ ary have been proposed for the area to be considered for wilderness status.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Northern California : Field Trip
    NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS This document may contain copyrighted materials. These materials have been made available for use in research, teaching, and private study, but may not be used for any commercial purpose. Users may not otherwise copy, reproduce, retransmit, distribute, publish, commercially exploit or otherwise transfer any material. The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be "used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research." If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. CENOZOIC VOLCANISM OF THE CENTRAL SIERRA NEVADA, CALIFORNIA By David B. Slemmons Mackay School of Mines, UNivtRsiTY of Nevada, Reno, Nevada The purpose of this article is to review the Cenozoic active tectonism in the Basin and Range province volcanic activity of the central Sierra Nevada and, under NSF Grant GP-5034. more briefly, the volcanism in the southern part of I w ish also to express my gratitude to Gary Ballew, the range. In a companion article in this bulletin. Dr. Peter Chapman, Jim Sjoberg, David Sterling, and Wil- Cordell Durrell revie\\ s the Cenozoic volcanic activity liam Tafuri for assistance in compiling isopach maps of the northern Sierra Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Crop and Livestock Report
    Tuolumne County Crop and Livestock Report 2017 Release point of cattle, where timber operations are ongoing in our multi-use forest Cattle drive down a logging road to release point. In the holding pen, cows and calves mothering up. Description of Cover Photos All photos courtesy of Terri Arington. Unloading Gaiser cattle at the OK coral. Leaving Gaiser Ranch loaded for the journey Belling to the summer grazing Gaiser cows allotment. Cattle “ Loadin up” , Cattle being gathered belled and for summer range. ready to go. 2017 Annual Crop and Livestock Report Feature Story High Sierra Summer Cattle Range: Cultural Heritage and Economic Necessity Cattle grazing has a long and important history in California, particularly in the Sierra’s. Beginning in the late eighteenth century grazing was the predominant agricultural and economic activity in the Spanish and later Mexican periods of the State’s history. The Spaniards and Mexicans, however, remained in the coastal lowlands and valleys and did not populate the Sierra Nevada. With the discovery of gold, the ced- ing of California to the United States and statehood, American immigrants rapidly populated the gold- bearing foothills of the Sierras. Within a short time they were penetrating the higher elevations of the range in search of wood, water and other resources to supply the mines. Forage for the herds that provided meat for the mining towns among these resources. In the 1860s, cattlemen and shepherds established sum- mer ranges for themselves on most of the useable meadowland for the high Sierra. On the western slope of the Sierra, livestock required winter feed, spring range, summer range and fall pasture.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Nevada Red Fox (Vulpus Vulpus Necator) As Threatened Or Endangered Under the Endangered Species Act
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR Petition to List the Sierra Nevada Red Fox (Vulpus vulpus necator) as Threatened or Endangered Under the Endangered Species Act Photo Courtesy and Copyright of Dr. John Perrine 27 April 2011 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY - 1 - 27 April 2011 Mr. Ken Salazar Mr. Ren Lohoefener Secretary of the Interior Pacific Southwest Regional Director Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 18th and "C" Street, N.W. 2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605 Washington, D.C. 20240 Sacramento, CA 95825 RE: PETITION TO LIST SIERRA NEVADA RED FOX (Vulpus vulpus necator) AS A THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES AND TO DESIGNATE CRITICAL HABITAT CONCURRENT WITH LISTING. Dear Mr. Salazar and Mr. Lohoefener: The Sierra Nevada red fox (Vulpus vulpus necator) is subspecies of red fox that historically ranged from the southern Sierra Nevada Mountains northward through the southern Cascade Mountains of California and Oregon. Despite 31 years of protection as a threatened species under the California Endangered Species Act, Sierra Nevada red fox remains critically endangered and in imminent danger of extinction: it is today restricted to two small California populations; one near Lassen Peak with fewer than 20 known foxes and a second near Sonora Pass with only three known foxes. The total number of remaining foxes is likely less than 50; it could be less than 20. Its perilously small population size makes it inherently vulnerable to extinction, and sharply magnifies the extinction potential of several threats. None of those threats are abated by existing regulatory mechanisms. Therefore, pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • TUOLUMNE COUNTY CROP and LIVESTOCK REPORT
    TUOLUMNETUOLUMNE COUNTYCOUNTY CROPCROP andand LIVESTOCKLIVESTOCK REPORTREPORT 20122012 County of Tuolumne Vicki Helmar Agricultural Commissioner • Weights & Measures Agricultural Commissioner Animal Control • Air Pollution Control Director of Weights & Measures 2 South Green Street, Sonora, CA 95370 Director of Animal Control Phone: 209-533-5691 Fax: 209-533-5520 Air Pollution Control Officer To: Karen Ross, Secretary California Department of Food and Agriculture The Honorable Board of Supervisors, County of Tuolumne Randy Hanvelt, Chairperson, Second District Sherri Brennan, First District Evan Royce, Third District John L. Gray, Fourth District Karl Rodefer, Fifth District Craig L. Pedro, County Administrative Officer I am pleased to submit, in accordance with Section 2279 of the California Food and Agriculture Code, Tuolumne County’s Annual Crop and Livestock Report for 2012. This report provides a statistical description of Tuolumne County’s agricultural production. The figures contained in this report represent gross values of agricultural commodities and do not reflect production costs or net returns to growers. The value of agricultural commodities produced in Tuolumne County in 2012 is estimated at $29,968,000. This represents a 2.5% increase from last year’s production value of $29,238,000. The 2012 crop year saw mixed results for Tuolumne County’s agriculture with half the categories experiencing increases in production values and the other half experiencing decreases in production values. Highlights of the 2012 crop year include: Favorable weather conditions during the growing season resulted in the highest production year on record for fruit and vegetables. The category total of $671,000 is a 67.7% jump from the 2011 production values.
    [Show full text]
  • Baker Station Historic Context Tuolumne County, California Stanislaus National Forest
    Baker Station Historic Context Tuolumne County, California Stanislaus National Forest Baker Highway Maintenance Station, 1931. California State Archives Collection Baker Station, approximately toward the northwest, down the old Sonora-Mono Road; shows oblique view of dining hall flanked by residences, with Social Hall closest to photographer. Department of Public Works; Division of Highways, California Highway Commission Records, Inventory F3778: 1364B, Box 10 of 40 (Location VB462); California State Archives. Historic Context for Baker Station Tuolumne County, California by Pamela A. Conners, Historian Stanislaus National Forest September 2003 Baker Station Historic District Baker Station is a collection of eleven buildings distributed on an approximately 5.8-acre site. The buildings are arranged in two clusters: one grouping has nine and the other has two buildings. All of the buildings contribute to the historic district. Baker Station also includes two objects: A simple, cement, commemorative marker and a support bar and hardware for a 19th century swing. The marker contributes to the historic district (cf. 24, 26-27). Baker Station is an early 1930s California Highway Commission, Division of Highways, Maintenance Station that has undergone little change since its construction. Baker Station is a historic district because it represents a significant linkage of buildings united historically by physical development, and because it meets Criteria A and C. That is, Baker Station is associated with an important historic context—the development of California’s transportation system—and architecturally, it represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components, though lacking individual distinction, strongly convey their historic context when taken as a whole. Baker Station is significant as a rare property type for its architecture and as one of few remaining, intact Division of Highways maintenance stations from this era (National Register Bulletin 15 rev.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Distribution of Bighorn Sheep in the Sierra Nevada, California
    Summer 2014 417 California Fish and Game 100(3):417-435; 2014 The historical distribution of bighorn sheep in the Sierra Nevada, California JOHN D. WEHAUSEN* AND FRED L. JONES White Mountain Research Center, University of California, 3000 East Line Street, Bishop, CA 93514, USA (JDW) 1721 Grouse Ridge Trail, Cool, CA 95614, USA (FLJ) *Correspondent: [email protected] Bighorn sheep in the Sierra Nevada disappeared from most of their historic range, surviving in only 3 populations west of the town of Independence in the Owens Valley. As a primary basis for restoration of these sheep, we compiled historical sightings and skull remains for Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep by twelve geographic regions, along with early estimates of population sizes where they existed. Historic sightings suggest that at least 10 populations survived to the twentieth century of which 2 persisted to the middle of that century before disappearing; but the sighting record does not distinguish viable populations from those that may have been declining to extinction. While it is possible for some populations to assign a decade when they disappeared, those populations may have lost viability earlier. Our data base probably represents the historical north-south distribution of these sheep and provides distributional details for some populations. However, it is remarkably sparse for some regions, suggesting that it may not have captured the full historical distribution of this animal, particularly west of the Sierra crest, where the earliest population losses may have occurred. Restoration efforts need to recognize this potential shortcoming. Key words: bighorn sheep, endangered species, historical distribution, Ovis canadensis sierrae, Sierra Nevada _________________________________________________________________________ Information on historical distribution is an important foundation for wildlife restoration programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature and History on the Sierra Crest: Devils Postpile and the Mammoth Lakes Sierra Devils Postpile Formation and Talus
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Devils Postpile National Monument California Nature and History on the Sierra Crest Devils Postpile and the Mammoth Lakes Sierra Christopher E. Johnson Historian, PWRO–Seattle Nature and History on the Sierra Crest: Devils Postpile and the Mammoth Lakes Sierra Devils Postpile formation and talus. (Devils Postpile National Monument Image Collection) Nature and History on the Sierra Crest Devils Postpile and the Mammoth Lakes Sierra Christopher E. Johnson Historian, PWRO–Seattle National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 2013 Production Project Manager Paul C. Anagnostopoulos Copyeditor Heather Miller Composition Windfall Software Photographs Credit given with each caption Printer Government Printing Office Published by the United States National Park Service, Pacific West Regional Office, Seattle, Washington. Printed on acid-free paper. Printed in the United States of America. 10987654321 As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural and cultural resources. This includes fostering sound use of our land and water resources; protecting our fish, wildlife, and biological diversity; preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places; and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to ensure that their development is in the best interests of all our people by encouraging stewardship and citizen participation in their care. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island territories under U.S.
    [Show full text]