DOCSLIB.ORG

Secondary Elevations from Records and Topographic Maps of the United

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Secondary Elevations from Records and Topographic Maps of the United SECONDARY ELEVATIONS Secondary elevations from records and topographic maps of the United States Geological Survey, including vertical-angle bench marks, altitudes of well-known summits, water-surface elevations of prominent lakes, and other useful elevations, are given below. These elevations are approximate only and should not be used for accurate work. Eleva­ Locality Quadrangle County tion A Feet 13, 736 Adin. ...............-.. ................ ... 4,271 6,480 13,882 130 7,785 3,747 13, 016 Alto "Poalr Tehipite. ............. Tulare. ....... _ .. ... 10. 521 Alturas Hill. ...... ... .......... ......... 4,446 11 2,130 Anaheim .............. Orange _____ ...... 162 Bishop ................ 9,470 San Francisco ......... 162 8,625 Ant Hill........... ............................ Bakersfleld Special . Kern..... 062 Mount Morrison...... Mono.... ... 7,642 10,200 6,837 6,036 2,043 6,940 1,851 10, 036 Mount Wbitney. ..... 12, 927 Tehipite...,. ...... -....do................. 12, 166 4,216 Arroyo Qrande ......... San Luis Obispo ...... 114 Indio Special .......... 6,222 Shasta. ............ 8,422 Atlas Peak... ... Napa.. _ .. _ .. Napa.... ............. 2,662 11, 264 B 2,524 5, 038 11,868 Bald Hill..... ........ ........................ Bidwell Bar...... ..... Butte. ........ ........ 5,973 1,188 7,834 4,613 7,253 9,045 2,140 Olancha ___ . ....... Tulare................ 9,430 1,930 Bald Rock... __ . _ . ______ . __ ....... Bidwell Bar..... __ .. Butte...... ____ ... 3,300 Bald Top.. ___ ..... _______ . __ ...... Cape San Martin.. ... San Luis Obispo ...... 2,556 Bald Top ............. _ ..... _ .... _ . __ . Downieville __ ...... Sierra.............. ... 5,878 6,674 Tehipite. ............. 9,515 e ofin Red Bluff............. 6,246 Banner Hill....... _ * __ . __ . _ .. __ ... Banner Hill Special ... 3,904 Banner Hill __ . ____ - .......... ......... Colfas ................. ....do.. .............. 3.904 713 714 SPIRIT LEVELING IN CALIFORNIA, 1896-1923 Eleva­ Locality Quadrangle County tion Feet 12, 966 1,477 14, 003 Basalt Hill-.-.-.-...-....-....-. __ ......... 1,705 Basin Mountain.. ________________ 13, 229 Redding.............. 9 778 10, 560 788 13, 118 Del Norte...... ....... Bear Butte _ . _ . _ ... _____ .... ....... 8,603 Bear Creek Spine..... _ ... __ . _____ . iq 7fm Bear Mountain _ . _ ....... ________ . n COC Bear Mountain triangulation station .. __ ... Preston Peak... ...... 6,436 Bear Eanch Hill--........- .........:. 4,906 Beauty Mountain............................ S fUt Beckwith Butte. ...... ............... ........ 7,248 Bedford Peak..................-.--..-. -.. 3,720 Bell Bluff. ............... .................... 3,446 1,844 Frcsno 10, 485 Bernardo Mountain...... ____ __ .. .... 1,138 Bidwell Peak............. _________ . 8,551 Bieber. ...................................... 4,169 Biedeinan Mountain... ___________ . 8,965 Big Baldy triangulation station.... ____ . Tehipite --...-. _ . ... 8,211 Big Bar Hill................................. Bidwell Bar. ......... 4,419 Big Canyon triangulation station ______ . 5,859 6,828 Bills Hill....... .............................. 1, 992 13, 660 Bisbee Peak.. .......... _ .._.........._..__ 1,205 Bishop Pass. _ . _ .. __ __________ , 11,989 Bismark ___ ___ ___ _ __ . ____ ... 2,370 Bixby Mountain..--..-- _ ... ______ .. 2,928 Black Butte triangulation station .... ........ 1,087 Black Crater..-......-...,.-.... _ ...... .... Shasta.. .............. 8,650 Black Fox Mountain.... ..................... .....do....... ...... 6,664 Black Hill..... ............................... 654 Black Mountain .. _ _ . __ .............. ... ..do.... ............ 9 VU\ Black Mountain...- __________ . .... 11,794 Black Mountain ... ______ . ............. 3,033 Black Mountain . ............................ 3,621 Black Mountain.. __ .... ____ .... ...... Kernville.. ........... Tulare..... _ ..-.. ... 7, 834 Black Mountain _ . _____________ Black Mountain _ ..-...-... _______ .. 3,850 Black Mountain _____________ . .... 13, 258 Black Mountain _______________ 1,276 Black Mountain ............................. 4,055 Black Mountain ............................. 6,220 9, 075 2,787 3,625 Colfax..... ........... 8,055 Black Peak.-.......-....---....--.....-...-. 10, 516 Black Point...... ____ ................... 6,960 -Black Point..., ..--... ................. 8,107 Blacktop Peak...... ......................... 12, 732 Blanco Mountain ...... ...................... Bishop... ............. 11,280 .....do.. ....... .... 12, 592 Bloomer Hill. ................................. Bidwell Bar. ........ 2,980 Blue Mountain. __ . ........................ 6,070 Blue Rock Mountain.... .................... 2,600 Blue Rock Ridge. .. _ --.....-.....-..--..... 2,585 Bluenose Peak.. ............................. 5,567 Bodie Mountain...-..-. _________ ... 10,201 BogusMouitfain.. _______ '. ______ . 4,622 Bohemotash Mountain. ___________ . Redding........ ...... 4,458 2, 784 3,060 tion. 7,429 Bradley Mountain ............................ Inyo-Tulare. ... ..... 13,280 .... .do.. .............. Tulare-. ----- - 13, 577 Redding.. ........ Shasta.... ........... 3,451 Mariposa. ........ 6,705 Del Norte.... .... 5,824 Fresno. __ .......... 7,13f .....do.. ....... .....do.. ....... ...... in sifl Brash Peak. ________ . ............... Goleta. ............... Santa Barbara ....... 3,059 1 In accordance with latest level-adjustment'data 9 feet has been added to all elevations on Mount Lyell map. SECONDARY ELEVATIONS 715 Eleva­ Locality Quadrangle County tion Feet Fresno.... _ ..... .... 8,795 T^nnlr T*Adlr Siskiyou.... ...... .... 6,337 San Benito _ ........ 3,517 San Benito _ ........ 3,121 Siskiyou.- . ....... 6, 917 Mariposa.. ... 3,794 4,523 Bidwell Bar........... Plumas---.-. _ __ .. 7,231 Buena Vista Lake.'. ... Kern.... 291 Madera ............... 9,692 Tehipite.. ..... Tulare. _ I...I __ ... 7,692 4, '416 Alpine..... ....... 9,489 Red Bluff.. ........... Shasta-Trinity.. ...... 7,073 San Luis Obispo. _ .. 3,026 Shasta..... ... 7,880 Mount Hamilton. Santa Clara.... _ .... 3,085 Escondido....... ..... San Diego ______ .. 2,144 Monterey....... _ ... 2,822 Tehipite.............. Fresno-.- ............. 10, 602 Bridgeport... Mono... .............. 8,852 Santa Cruz __ ....... San Mnteo..... ....... 1,708 Deep Creek. _ .. ..... San Bernardino __ ... 8,502 Plurnas-Tehama...... 7,831 c Santa Barbara... ..... 4,685 Santa Monica......... Los Angeles.... ....... 1,825 San Bernardino. ...... 5,342 2,169 Chico................. 2,377 Bridgeport.... .- __ . Mono-Tuolumne.. ... 11,751 Bidwell Bar........... 5,76C 11, 543 Modoc..... 4,351 Fresno... .. 9,52£ Inyo-Fresno... _ .. 13, 388 4.43C Carson Hill.... ............................... Jackson ............... Calaveras. ............ 1,983 Casa Diablo Mountain triangulation station.. Mount Morrison...... Mono..... ........ 7,935 Mariposa.. ........... 7,775 Case Mountain..... ___ __ ___ . _ .. Kaweah ____ .. ..... Tulare. ....... ........ 6.84C Fresno.. .............. 11,415 Tehipite. ....... ...... .. ...do...... ........... 10, 668 9, 13t Tuolumne..... ....... 9.62C 7,780 .... .do...... ........... 9,150 2,819 3,481 Mount Lyell '......... Mariposa-Tuolumne . 10, 942 Yosemite Valley map. Mariposa.. ....... 5,61( f 6, 551 .....do................. .....do....... .......... \ 5, 903 1 6, 114 Contra Costa. .... 2.100 8,30! Mono-Tuolumne ...... 11, 22( San Luis Obispo. _ . San Luis Obispo. ..... 2,617 235 Chalk Cliff.... ............................... Bakersfleld Special .... Kern _ .............. 1,726 Monterey-San Benito. 3,287 Red Bluff __ ... ...... Trinity...... ...... 6,475 Fresno. ............... 13, 077 Ventura. ............. 2,32( San Bernardino ....... 3,562 San Benito . 3,63< Cherry Hill................................... Tulare........^...... 8,812 Monterey ............. 5.06C Tulare...- ........ 8,001 DelNorte.... ..... 5,745 San Bernardino .... 71C 7,932 ... ...do. i ............... ......do. ... ..... ... 8,048 2, 90S 8,501 San Benito _ . ....... 2,848 Cirque Mountain __ ,. ________ ...... Bridgeport __ .. .. Mono ................ 10, 73£ 1 In accordance with latest level-adjustment data 9 feet has been added to all elevations on Mount Lyell map. 8 In accordance with latest level-adjustment data 85 feet has been subtracted from all elevations on Yo­ semite map. 716 SPIRIT LEVELING IN CALIFORNIA, 1896-1923 Eleva­ Locality Quadrangle County tion Feet 12, 863 Colfax........ ......... 6,500 542 Clark Mountain ____ ... ................... Placerville.. _____ Eldorado _ . ....... 1,586 11, 515 5,319 __ do ................. - do .. 4,537 9,924 5,635 Venture ............... 6,730 Colfax ................. Placer.... __ ___ .. 3,699 Colfax Hill. .................................. ... ..do..... ............ do . 2,886 12, 417 10,709 ..do .............. 5,03] Goleta Special ___ . Santa Barbara.. ...... 3,000 Junipero Serra ......... 5,155 1,811 12, 565 Cook Peak.. ................................. Kernville _ .......... Kern .................. 5,410 9,581 4,372 Seiad .................. 6.237 9,708 Shasta. ............... 6,740 San Diego ............. 1,590 Cowtrack Mountain triangulation station.... Mount Morrison ...... Mono ___ ........... 8,875 Tulare.. ___ . ...... 10,919 12, 246 8,344 9,555 6,123 Crater Peak .................................. 8,724 Crocker Mountain ............................ 12, 448 Crocker Point. ............................... 7,090 Tulare.. .............. 12, 140 Crossman __ . ............................... 3,985 Crown Mountain ___ ____ .. ...........
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proposed Submersed Aquatic Vegetation Treatment Sites for 2017
    ·|}þ113 80 ¨¦§ 250b ¤£50 ·|}þ160 ·|}þ16 Proposed Submersed Aquatic Vegetation ¨¦§5 250a Treatment Sites for 2017Yolo ·|}þ84 ·|}þ99 248b 234 232 231 233 230 247a 259 225 247b 224 223 246a 226 222 Sacramento 276 269 246b 220 258a 275 221 258b 219 218 ·|}þ113 279 271 268 257a 280 274 257b 255 ·|}þ160 217 270 265 266 ·|}þ104 278 245 277 256b 216 215 273 264 256a 254 283 267 214 284 282 213a 272 263 262 213b 281 ·|}þ220 253a 244 253b 212a Solano 289 212b ·|}þ84 261 252b 243 211a 208 260 252a 211b 207 288 251a ·|}þ12 251b 242 206 240a 287 241 210a 240b 205 210b San Joaquin ¨¦§5 286 204 140 285 203 209a 209b 200 202 201 20 ·|}þ12 18a 18b 139 22 19a 40 176 21a 21b 19b 36 43 37 17a 44 39 138 41 135 106 17b 35 23b 137 104a 104b 105 38 34 136 23a 175 42 129 160 ·|}þ 103a 16 33 31 128 125 24a 174 103b 107 126 24b 111 173 15 30 123 122 69 32 124 119a 101b 114 29 121a 120a 119b 113 110 171 102 101a 14 121b 120b 117 115 118 116 112 108 ·|}þ4 100 68 13 109 28 99a 26 99b 11 67 65 Site ID Site Name Acres 12 10 98b 8 Atherton Cove 22 97 66 60 8 Duraflame 5 98a 10 Buckley Cove 22 96 59 61 14 Headreach Island 65 95 9 18a Korth's Pirates Lair 13 92b 58 62 8 18a Perry's Boat Harbor 9 92a 57 7 18a Willow Berm 22 91a 94 26 Fourteenmile Slough 41 56 63 ·|}þ4 30 Mosher Slough 36 91b 31 Pixley Slough 65 90a 55 54 53 5 32 Disappointment Slough 284 90b 64 34 Bishop Cut 112 93 52 36 White Slough Upland 23 37 White Slough 196 48 49 47 38 Honker Cut 48 89a 50 4 65 Latham Slough 381 79 Rivers End 11 89b 51 46 87b Kings Island 2 87b 86a 85a 87a,b Italian Slough 11 87a
    [Show full text]
  • Page 78 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 45A–1 Kaweah River and The
    § 45a–1 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 78 Kaweah River and the headwaters of that branch Fork Kaweah River to its junction with Cactus of Little Kern River known as Pecks Canyon; Creek; thence easterly along the first hydro- thence southerly and easterly along the crest of graphic divide south of Cactus Creek to its the hydrographic divide between Pecks Canyon intersection with the present west boundary of and Soda Creek to its intersection with a lateral Sequoia National Park, being the west line of divide at approximately the east line of section township 16 south, range 29 east; thence south- 2, township 19 south, range 31 east; thence erly along said west boundary to the southwest northeasterly along said lateral divide to its corner of said township; thence easterly along intersection with the township line near the the present boundary of Sequoia National Park, southeast corner of township 18 south, range 31 being the north line of township 17 south, range east of the Mount Diablo base and meridian; 29 east, to the northeast corner of said township; thence north approximately thirty-five degrees thence southerly along the present boundary of west to the summit of the butte next north of Sequoia National Park, being the west lines of Soda Creek (United States Geological Survey al- townships 17 and 18 south, range 30 east, to the titude eight thousand eight hundred and eighty- place of beginning; and all of those lands lying eight feet); thence northerly and northwesterly within the boundary line above described are in- along the crest of the hydrographic divide to a cluded in and made a part of the Roosevelt-Se- junction with the crest of the main hydro- quoia National Park; and all of those lands ex- graphic divide between the headwaters of the cluded from the present Sequoia National Park South Fork of the Kaweah River and the head- are included in and made a part of the Sequoia waters of Little Kern River; thence northerly National Forest, subject to all laws and regula- along said divide now between Horse and Cow tions applicable to the national forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Tulare County Measure R Riparian-Wildlife Corridor Report
    Tulare County Measure R Riparian-Wildlife Corridor Report Prepared by Tulare Basin Wildlife Partners for Tulare County Association of Govenments 11 February 2008 Executive Summary As part of an agreement with the Tulare County Association of Governments, Tulare Basin Wildlife Partners (TBWP) visited nine potential riparian and wildlife corridors in Tulare County during summer 2007. We developed a numerical ranking system and determined the five corridors with highest potential for conservation, recreation and conjunctive uses. The selected corridors include: Deer Creek Riparian Corridor, Kings River Riparian Corridor, Oaks to Tules Riparian Corridor, Lewis Creek Riparian Corridor, and Cottonwood Creek Wildlife Corridor. For each corridor, we provide a brief description and a summary of attributes and opportunities. Opportunities include flood control, groundwater recharge, recreation, tourism, and wildlife. We also provide a brief description of opportunities for an additional eight corridors that were not addressed in depth in this document. In addition, we list the Measure R transportation improvements and briefly discuss the potential wildlife impacts for each of the projects. The document concludes with an examination of other regional planning efforts that include Tulare County, including the San Joaquin Valley Blueprint, the Tulare County Bike Path Plan, the TBWP’s Sand Ridge-Tulare Lake Plan, the Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), and the USFWS Upland Species Recovery Plan. Tulare Basin Wildlife Partners, 2/11/2008 Page 2 of 30 Table of Contents Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………. 4 Goals and Objectives………………………...……………………………………………. 4 Tulare County Corridors……………………..……………………………………………. 5 Rankings………………………………………………………………………….. 5 Corridors selected for Detailed Study…………………………………………….. 5 Deer Creek Corridor………………………………………………………. 5 Kings River Corridor……………………………………………………… 8 Oaks to Tules Corridor…………………………………..………………… 10 Lewis Creek East of Lindsay……………………………………………… 12 Cottonwood Creek………………………………………...……………….
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA FISH and GAME ' CONSERVATION of WILDLIFE THROUGH EDUCATION'
    REPRINT FROM CALIFORNIA FISH and GAME ' CONSERVATION OF WILDLIFE THROUGH EDUCATION' . VOLUME 50 APRIL 1964 NUMBER 2 ANNUAL ABUNDANCE OF YOUNG STRIPED BASS, ROCCUS SAXATILIS, IN THE SACRAMENTO- SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, CALIFORNIA' HAROLD K. CHADWICK Inland Fisheries Branch California Department of Fish and Game INTRODUCTION A reliable index of striped bass spawning success would serve two important management purposes. First, it would enable us to determine if recruitment is directly related to spawning success. If it is, we could predict important changes in the fishery three years in advance. Second, it would give insight into environmental factors responsible for good and poor year-classes. Besides increasing our understanding of the bass population, this knowledge might be used to improve recruit- ment by modifying water development plans in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta under the State Water Resources Development System. Fyke net samples provided the earliest information on young bass distribution (Hatton, 1940). They were not promising for estimating abundance, and subsequent sampling of eggs and larvae with plankton nets also had important limitations (Calhoun and Woodhull, 1948; Cal- houn, Woodhull, and Johnson, 1950). An exploratory survey with tow nets in the early summer of 1947 (Calhoun and Woodhull, 1948) found bass about an inch long dis- tributed throughout the lower Sacramento-San Joaquin River system except in the Sacramento River above Isleton. This suggested the best index of spawning success would be the abundance of bass about an inch long, measured by tow netting. In 1948 and 1949 extensive tow net surveys were made to measure the relative abundance of young bass in the Delta between Rio Vista and Pittsburg (Erkkila et al., 1950).
    [Show full text]
  • Lands Suitable for Timber Management
    C a S r l a en C Hefty, Mount d k Bushnell Hill z e g Fro r e e e C r k T ree r C C C e olts e r n C k e h e e k k e en e h Tuchuck Mountain r is ek C K re e n C T c tio u a r rv p Sta Th S om a Cr Creek eek Johnson T uc hu ck C T r rail C Bald Mountain ee reek k k e T ek e re r N t C C o Yakinikak Creek ef a k l tl i C o Trailcreek in C k ! Twin Buttes e Cleft Rock Mountain K re e k e r e k C e A T r o C k m o e d k r e a Lewis, Mount S o l ek F a e Cr Wedge Mountain C y r tle e n T e A k Hornet MountainHorne t Creek N Tepee Creek in T Thompson-Seton, Mount k o C T r ee In k u K y oop T a ee Cr Babb C eek Whale Buttes ! re Center Mountain e k k e TT re t Akinkoka Peak n C e m a ge k k na k e o a ree T M C e k k r e e le r n e b ha i r m C i W k T Locke, Mount C se r o o A f o y le M b t ta i Red Buttes T r Su H o ds a n w h La k S Cr eek Huntsberger Peak T Young, Mount T Nasukoin Mountain k n T e a k l e e t P e r s r re C C o F w e 6 c 8 o 9 Hoodoo Hill d u 1 Lake Mountain ea pr S M S p ed rin T R g C re Fortine ek ! T Polebridge !@ Link Mountain ! Ha WhiteTfish Mountain y C re ek Wetzel T ,000 ! k 5 ree 7 n C 1 ra : Mo 1 k e e k .
    [Show full text]
  • Floodplain and Wetland Assessment for the Site 300 Entrance/Exit Corral Hollow Road Widening Project
    LLNL-AR-820616 L L NFloodplain and Wetland L - XAssessment for the Site 300 X XEntrance/Exit Corral X -Hollow Road Widening X X XProject Adjacent to the X XLawrence Livermore National Laboratory Experimental Test Site March 15, 2021 Floodplain and Wetland Assessment for the Site 300 Entrance/Exit Corral Hollow Road Widening Project Prepared by: Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC Environmental Functional Area Water Resources and Environmental Planning Group Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Field Office Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory ii Floodplain and Wetland Assessment for the Site 300 Entrance/Exit Corral Hollow Road Widening Project Table of Contents Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description.......................................................................................................................... 1 Description of the Project Site ........................................................................................................ 2 Potential Floodplains Impacts ......................................................................................................... 3 Potential Wetlands Impacts............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation
    NPS Form 10-900-b 0MB No. 1024-0018 (Jan. 1987) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service WAV 141990' National Register of Historic Places NATIONAL Multiple Property Documentation Form REGISTER This form is for use in documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Cobscook Area Coastal Prehistoric Sites_________________________ B. Associated Historic Contexts ' • The Ceramic Period; . -: .'.'. •'• •'- ;'.-/>.?'y^-^:^::^ .='________________________ Suscruehanna Tradition _________________________ C. Geographical Data See continuation sheet D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in j£6 CFR Part 8Q^rjd th$-§ecretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and Evaluation. ^"-*^^^ ~^~ I Signature"W"e5rtifying official Maine Historic Preservation O ssion State or Federal agency and bureau I, hereby, certify that this
    [Show full text]
  • Dix Mountain Wilderness Area Unit Management Plan Amendment
    New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Lands & Forests Region 5 Dix Mountain Wilderness Area Unit Management Plan Amendment Towns of Elizabethtown, Keene and North Hudson Essex County, New York January 2004 George E. Pataki Erin M. Crotty Governor Commissioner Lead Agency: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway Albany, NY 12233-4254 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Office of the Commissioner, 14th Floor 625 Broadway, Albany, New York 12233-1010 Phone: (518) 402-8540 • FAX: (518) 402-8541 Website: www.dec.state.ny.us Erin M. Crotty Commissioner MEMORANDUM To: The Record From: Erin M. Crotty Re: Unit Management Plan Dix Mountain Wilderness Area The Unit Management Plan for the Dix Mountain Wilderness Area has been completed. The Plan is consistent with the guidelines and criteria of the Adirondack Park State Land Master Plan, the State Constitution, Environmental Conservation Law, and Department rules, regulations and policies. The Plan includes management objectives and a five year budget and is hereby approved and adopted ___________________________________ Erin M. Crotty, Commissioner PREFACE The Dix Mountain Wilderness Area Unit Management Plan has been developed pursuant to, and is consistent with, relevant provisions of the New York State Constitution, the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL), the Executive Law, the Adirondack Park State Land Master Plan, Department of Environmental Conservation (“Department”) rules and regulations, Department policies and procedures and the State Environmental Quality and Review Act. Most of the State land which is the subject of this Unit Management Plan (UMP) is Forest Preserve lands protected by Article XIV, Section 1 of the New York State Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • VOL. 5 JUNE 1956 N0.6 W T I T B T a P T PUBLISHED BY
    ( L d e s c o p e 2 5 0 VOL. 5 JUNE 1956 N0.6 W t i t B t a p t PUBLISHED BY G r eat L a k e s M o d e l S hipbuilders ' G u il d J. E. JOHNSTON, 54Q1 Woodward Avenue R- H DAVISON, E d ito r:____ Detro.t 2> Michigan — Associate_Editor Membership $3.00 Subscription $2.50 Supported in part by the Detroit Historical Society EDITORIAL Cooperation is the key to whatever success we have achieved in our effort to preserve the history of Great Lakes commervial shipping. There have been so many examples of good cooperation, within the past month, it might be well to mention it here. The U.S.Naval Reserve, Chicago office, came up with plans and photo­ graphs of the "Willmette", ex "Eastland”. The brothers, Frank and Robt. Kuhn, dropped in at the museum with a lot of good leads, and the sheets from the plans of the "Virginia" which are missing from our set. Mr.Wil- liam McDonald sent in the histories of the steamers shown on the last pages of this issue. Mr.Dexter Goodison, of Erieau, Ontario, presented us with the plans of a modern, welded-steel gill netter. Frank Slyker brought in his completed plans of the U.S.Michigan (later the gunboat "Wolverine"). The American Shipbuilding sent us the plans of the flat top "Wolverine" which was formerly the "Seeandbee". All this is very gratifying, and confirms our belief that through regional cooperation there is hardly any end to what we may achieve in the field of Creat Lakes history.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for the USA (W7A
    Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7A - Arizona) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S53.1 Issue number 5.0 Date of issue 31-October 2020 Participation start date 01-Aug 2010 Authorized Date: 31-October 2020 Association Manager Pete Scola, WA7JTM Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Document S53.1 Page 1 of 15 Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE CONTROL....................................................................................................................................... 3 DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Program Derivation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 General Information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Final Ascent
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of Surface Waters of California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTI8 SMITH, DIEECTOE WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 296 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS OF CALIFORNIA PART II. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OP JOHN C. HOYT BY B. D. WOOD In cooperation with the State Water Commission and the Conservation Commission of the State of California WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1912 NOTE. A complete list of the gaging stations maintained in the San Joaquin River basin from 1888 to July 1, 1912, is presented on pages 100-102. 2 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS IN SAN JOAQUIN RIYER BASIN, CALIFORNIA. By B. D. WOOD. INTRODUCTION. This gazetteer is the second of a series of reports on the* surf ace waters of California prepared by the United States Geological Survey under cooperative agreement with the State of California as repre­ sented by the State Conservation Commission, George C. Pardee, chairman; Francis Cuttle; and J. P. Baumgartner, and by the State Water Commission, Hiram W. Johnson, governor; Charles D. Marx, chairman; S. C. Graham; Harold T. Powers; and W. F. McClure. Louis R. Glavis is secretary of both commissions. The reports are to be published as Water-Supply Papers 295 to 300 and will bear the fol­ lowing titles: 295. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part I, Sacramento River basin. 296. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part II, San Joaquin River basin. 297. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part III, Great Basin and Pacific coast streams. 298. Water resources of California, Part I, Stream measurements in the Sacramento River basin.
    [Show full text]
  • High Resolution Adobe PDF
    114°40'0"W 114°20'0"W 114°0'0"W "Puddin Mountain Na Wilson Mountain tl F Rd ore 021 " st D ad evelop Ro P A Y E T T E N F Quartzite Mountain " Sheep Horn MountainDAVE LDEaWveI SLe wPiEs PAeKak PUDDIN MOUNTAIN HOODOO MEADOWS BLACKBIRD MOUNTAIN BLACKBIRD CREEK COBALT LAKE MOUNTAIN WILLIAMS LAKE SAL MOUNTAIN " " Rd McEleny Mountain 1 2 1 " d Lake Mountain Mormon Mountain a o Swan Peak d Sal Mountain " R R " N 0 K Mountain " p " 2 Williams Lake " Red Rock Peak 0 0 o d ' l e oa " 0 Two Point Peak v " R ° e D op 5 t l " es e 4 r v Fo e atl Moyer Peak D N d t Middle Fork Peak R s " re Shellrock Peak k o " a F " e l Degan Mountain P t k a c " u N D BEAR CREEK POINT APAREJO POINT YELLOWJACKET DUCK CREEK POINT OPAL LAKE TAYLOR MOUNTAIN DEGAN MOUNTAIN GOLDBUG RIDGE POISON PEAK A Duck Peak N g d Iron C F ree a R k " D R t d e k R d 3 e D e 8 re e 3 T r r e l Watson Peak C Taylor Mountain e n P Sheephorn Mountain 3 " L r 9 Poison" Peak e " y w v " Poison l w o i Creek b S R H d C in Trail Cr Norton Ridge Peak a a S ee m R k Rd a U Ba " s Iron Mountain si C Black Mountain n C Martin Mountain re reek R d e Wards Butte " k " King Mountain " R " d " B O I S E N F NORTON RIDGE RAMEY HILL SLEEPING DEER MOUNTAIN MEYERS COVE MEYERS COVE POINT BLACK MWOoUoNdsT PAeIaNk WARDS BUTTE HAT CREEK ALLISON CREEK LEM PEAK " Bear Valley Lake #1 FRANK CHURCH - RIVER OF NO RETURN WILDERNESS Van Horn Peak Lem Peak Sleeping Deer Mountain " " on Cree llis k " A R d Falconberry Peak H a " Table Mountain t " C White" Mountain re e Long Mountain Forre k st White Goat Mountain
    [Show full text]