DOCSLIB.ORG

Daf Ditty Eruvin 76: Circle in the Square

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Daf Ditty Eruvin 76: Circle in the Square Eruvin 76 Circle in the Square Daf Ditty Eruvin 76: Circle in the Square The circle is the set of points in a plane that are equally distant from a fixed point in the plane. The fixed point is called the center. The given distance is called the radius. The totality of points on the circle is called the circumference. “Circle” is from the Latin circulus, which means “small ring” and is the diminutive of the Latin circus and the Greek kuklos, which mean “a round” or “a ring”1 [Squaring the circle] involves constructing an ideal square with an area equal to that of a given circle (where the radius of the circle is one, an area equal to pi) and doing so in a finite number of operations using only a straight edge and a compass. A practically identical problem is the rectification of the circle: Constructing an ideal straight line equal in length to the circumference of the 2 circle. 1 LIDDELL, Henry George and Robert Scott, eds.1889. An Intermediate Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford. Clarendon Press. 2 http://www.song-of-songs.net/Martin_Gardner.html Eruvin 76 Circle in the Square MISHNA: If there is a window in a wall that separates between two courtyards, and the window measures four by four handbreadths and is within ten handbreadths of the ground, the inhabitants of the courtyards establish two eiruvin, one for each courtyard. And if they desire, they may establish one eiruv, thereby merging the two courtyards, as they may be considered as one due to the window. Eruvin 76 Circle in the Square However, if the window measures less than four by four handbreadths, or if it is above ten handbreadths from the ground, it is no longer considered a valid opening, and the two courtyards cannot be considered a single courtyard. Therefore, the residents establish two eiruvin, but they may not establish one eiruv. can choose to חצירות of the ground, the טפחים in size, and within 10 טפחים If the window is 4 by 4 because עירובין because they are connected through the window, or separate עירוב make a single they are separated by the wall. Eruvin 76 Circle in the Square that less ג"רשב is not because we assume like חצירות would connect the טפחים The reason that four If the window .טפחים is always defined as being 4 פתח Rather, it is because a .לבוד is טפחים' ד than or the entire window is more than 10, טפחים is either less than 4 by 4 .עירובין are considered separate and must make two separate חצירות off the ground, the טפחים GEMARA: With regard to the mishna’s determination that the size of the window must be four by four handbreadths, the Gemara asks: Let us say that we learned an unattributed mishna in accordance with the previously cited opinion of Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel, who said: Any gap less than four handbreadths is considered lavud, i.e., two objects are considered connected if the space between them is less than four handbreadths. That would explain why the window must be four handbreadths in size, as otherwise it would be considered as though it were sealed, based on the principle of lavud. Eruvin 76 Circle in the Square The Gemara rejects this suggestion: Even if you say that the mishna is in accordance with the opinion of the Rabbis that only gaps of less than three handbreadths are included in the principle of lavud, the Rabbis disagreed with Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel only with regard to the halakhot of lavud, i.e., what is considered connected. But with regard to an opening, even the Rabbis agree that if there is an opening of four by four handbreadths, it is significant, and if not, it is not significant. אָמַר רבִי יוחָנָן: חַלון עָגול צָריְ שֶיְהֵא בְהֶיקֵפו עֶשְרים וְאַרבָעָה טְפָחִים, ושְנַיִם ומַשֶּהו מֵהֶן בְתוְ .עֲשָרה, שֶאִם יְרבְעֶנו, נִמְצָא מַשֶּהו בְתוְ עֲשָרה Rabbi Yoḥanan said: A circular window must have a circumference of twenty-four handbreadths, with two and a bit of them within ten handbreadths of the ground, so that when he squares the window, i.e., if he forms the shape of a square inside it, it measures four by four handbreadths, and a bit of it is then within ten handbreadths of the ground. .מִכְדי, כֹל שֶיֵש בְהֶיקֵפו שְלשָה טְפָחִים — יֵש בו בְרוחְבו טֶפַח, בִתְריסַר סַגִיא The Gemara poses a question with regard to this calculation: Now, since there is a general principle that any circle with a circumference of three handbreadths is one handbreadth in diameter, then according to this formula, a window with a circumference of twelve handbreadths, meaning that it has a diameter of four handbreadths, should be sufficient to create a window of four by four. .הָנֵי מִילֵי בְעִיגולָא, אֲבָל בְריבועָא בָעִינַן טְפֵי This measurement applies only to a circle and the ratio between its circumference and diameter, but with regard to a square that must fit entirely within that circle, we require a circle with a larger circumference. In order for a square of four by four handbreadths to be entirely contained within a circle, the circumference of the circle must measure more than twelve handbreadths !מִכְדי, כַמָה מְרובָע יָתֵר עַל הֶעָגול — רבִיעַ, בְשִיתְסַר סַגִיא The Gemara asks: Now, how much larger is a square than a circle? It is larger by one quarter. If so, a circle with a circumference of sixteen handbreadths at most should suffice. הָנֵי מִילֵי עִיגולָא דְנָפֵיק מִגו ריבועָא. אֲבָל ריבועָא דְנָפֵיק מִגו עִיגולָא, בָעִינַן טְפֵי. מַאי טַעְמָא? .מִשּום מורשָא דקרנָתָא The Gemara answers: This statement that a square is larger than a circle by a quarter applies only to a circle circumscribed by a square, but with regard to a square circumscribed by a circle, we require more, and the difference between the square and the circle is greater. Eruvin 76 Circle in the Square What is the reason for this? It is due to the projection of the corners of the square, as the distance from the center of the square to its corners is greater than the distance from the center to its sides. .מִכְדי, כׇּל אַמְתָא בְריבועַ — אַמְתָא ותְרי חומְשֵי בַאֲלַכְסונָא, בְשֵיבְסַר נְכֵי חומְשָא סַגִיא The Gemara further objects: Since every cubit in the side of a square is a cubit and two-fifths in the diagonal, a square of four by four handbreadths has a diagonal of five and three-fifths handbreadths. And since the diameter of a circle equals the diagonal of the square that it encompasses, the circle circumscribing a square of four by four handbreadths has a diameter of five and three-fifths handbreadths. If that measure is multiplied by three to arrive at the circumference of that circle, the result is that a circle with a circumference of seventeen handbreadths minus a fifth is sufficient to circumscribe a square of four by four handbreadths. Why, then, does Rabbi Yoḥanan say that a circular window must have a circumference of twenty- four handbreadths? רבִי יוחָנָן אָמַר כִי דַיָינֵי דקיסָרי, וְאָמְרי לַה כְרבָנַן דקיסָרי, דְאָמְרי: עִיגולָא מִגו ריבועָא — ריבְעָא, .ריבועָא מִגו עִיגולָא — פַלְגָא The Gemara answers: Rabbi Yoḥanan spoke in accordance with the opinion of the judges of Caesarea, and some say in accordance with the opinion of the Sages of Caesarea, who say: A circle that is circumscribed within a square is smaller than it by one quarter; with regard to a Eruvin 76 Circle in the Square square that is circumscribed within a circle, the difference between them is equal to half the square. According to this explanation, Rabbi Yoḥanan calculated as follows: Since a square of four by four handbreadths has a perimeter of sixteen handbreadths, the circumference of the circle that encompasses it must be fifty percent larger, or twenty-four handbreadths. Avrohom Adler writes:3 If between two courtyards there was a window of four tefachim by four, within ten tefachim from the ground, the tenants may prepare two eiruvs, or, if they prefer, they may prepare one (jointly). [The tenants of one courtyard deposit their eiruv in the other, and by joining together, both groups of tenants are permitted the unrestricted use of both courtyards.] If the size of the window was less than four tefachim by four (which cannot be regarded as a valid opening), or higher than ten tefachim from the ground, two eiruvs may be prepared, but not one. 3 http://dafnotes.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Eiruvin_76.pdf Eruvin 76 Circle in the Square [This is because the wall constitutes a solid partition between the courtyards. It is consequently forbidden to move objects between the courtyards either over the wall or through any small apertures or cracks in it.] Our Daf asks: Must it be assumed that we have here learned an anonymous Mishna (when it stated that if the window is less than four tefachim square, it is regarded as closed) in agreement with Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel who ruled that wherever an opening is less than four tefachim, it is considered lavud? [Is it likely, however, that an anonymous Mishna, which usually represents the accepted halachah, would agree with an individual opinion against that of the majority, and the majority maintains that the principle of lavud is stated only when an opening is less than three tefachim?] The Gemora answers: It may be said to agree even with the Rabbis; for the Rabbis differed from Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel only in regard to the laws of lavud. Regarding an opening, however, even they may agree that only if its size is four tefachim by four is it regarded as a valid opening, but otherwise it cannot be so regarded.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Decline of the Generations (Haazinu)
    21 Sep 2020 – 3 Tishri 5781 B”H Dr Maurice M. Mizrahi Congregation Adat Reyim Torah discussion on Haazinu The Decline of the Generations Introduction In this week’s Torah portion, Haazinu, Moses tells the Israelites to remember their people’s past: זְכֹר֙יְמֹ֣ות םעֹולָָ֔ ב ִּ֖ ינּו נ֣ שְ ֹותּדֹור־וָד֑ ֹור שְאַַ֤ ל אָב ֙יך֙ וְ יַגֵָ֔דְ ךזְקֵנ ִּ֖יך וְ יֹֹ֥אמְ רּו לְָָֽך Remember the days of old. Consider the years of generation after generation. Ask your father and he will inform you; your elders, and they will tell you. [Deut. 32:7] He then warns them that prosperity (growing “fat, thick and rotund”) and contact with idolaters will cause them to fall away from their faith, so they should keep alive their connection with their past. Yeridat HaDorot Strong rabbinic doctrine: Yeridat HaDorot – the decline of the generations. Successive generations are further and further away from the revelation at Sinai, and so their spirituality and ability to understand the Torah weakens steadily. Also, errors of transmission may have been introduced, especially considering a lot of the Law was oral: מש הק בֵלּתֹורָ ה מ סינַי, ּומְ סָרָ ּהל יהֹושֻׁעַ , ו יהֹושֻׁעַ ל זְקֵנים, ּוזְקֵנים ל נְב יאים, ּונְב יא ים מְ סָ רּוהָ ילְאַנְשֵ נכְ ס ת הַגְדֹולָה Moses received the Torah from Sinai and transmitted it to Joshua, Joshua to the elders, and the elders to the prophets, and the prophets to the Men of the Great Assembly. [Avot 1:1] The Mishnah mourns the Sages of ages past and the fact that they will never be replaced: When Rabbi Meir died, the composers of parables ceased.
    [Show full text]
  • What Sugyot Should an Educated Jew Know?
    What Sugyot Should An Educated Jew Know? Jon A. Levisohn Updated: May, 2009 What are the Talmudic sugyot (topics or discussions) that every educated Jew ought to know, the most famous or significant Talmudic discussions? Beginning in the fall of 2008, about 25 responses to this question were collected: some formal Top Ten lists, many informal nominations, and some recommendations for further reading. Setting aside the recommendations for further reading, 82 sugyot were mentioned, with (only!) 16 of them duplicates, leaving 66 distinct nominated sugyot. This is hardly a Top Ten list; while twelve sugyot received multiple nominations, the methodology does not generate any confidence in a differentiation between these and the others. And the criteria clearly range widely, with the result that the nominees include both aggadic and halakhic sugyot, and sugyot chosen for their theological and ideological significance, their contemporary practical significance, or their centrality in discussions among commentators. Or in some cases, perhaps simply their idiosyncrasy. Presumably because of the way the question was framed, they are all sugyot in the Babylonian Talmud (although one response did point to texts in Sefer ha-Aggadah). Furthermore, the framing of the question tended to generate sugyot in the sense of specific texts, rather than sugyot in the sense of centrally important rabbinic concepts; in cases of the latter, the cited text is sometimes the locus classicus but sometimes just one of many. Consider, for example, mitzvot aseh she-ha-zeman gerama (time-bound positive mitzvoth, no. 38). The resulting list is quite obviously the product of a committee, via a process of addition without subtraction or prioritization.
    [Show full text]
  • Several Comments on a Genizah Fragment of Bavli, Eruvin 57B–59A
    HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies ISSN: (Online) 2072-8050, (Print) 0259-9422 Page 1 of 4 Original Research Several comments on a Genizah fragment of Bavli, Eruvin 57B–59A Author: This article refers to a Cairo Genizah fragment related to Bavli, Eruvin tractate 57b–59a, 1 Uri Zur identified as Cambridge, UL T-S F1 (1) 85. FGP No. C 96541. The article begins with a description Affiliation: of the Genizah fragment and presents a reproduction of the fragment itself at the end of the 1Israel Heritage Department, article. Reference is made to the content and several comments are made in an effort to Ariel University, Ariel, Israel characterise the fragment. Corresponding author: Keywords: Genizah; Eruvin; Sugya; Aramaic words; Geographical sites. Uri Zur, [email protected] Dates: Description of the Genizah Fragment Received: 11 Jan. 2019 The Genizah fragment is identified as Cambridge, UL T-S F1 (1) 85, and here I shall discuss one Accepted: 21 May 2019 Published: 12 Nov. 2019 folio (No. C 96541 at the Friedberg Jewish Manuscript Society) selected at random. How to cite this article: The fragment includes approximately 36 lines. The measurements of the folio are 26.5 cm × 32.3 Zur, U., 2019, ‘Several cm. The measurements of the written area are 20.5 cm × 24.5 cm. The page is torn at the edges comments on a Genizah and a considerable part of it is faded and illegible. The legible part of the fragment, which fragment of Bavli, Eruvin 57B–59A’, HTS Teologiese parallels that of the printed version (Vilna), begins with the words ‘…ve-ha at hu de-amrat’ .(59a) (אין, למקום) ’57b) and ends with the words ‘ein, le-makom) (והא את הוא דאמרת) Studies/Theological Studies 75(3), a5381.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagrams in Rashi's Commentary: a Case Study of Eruvin
    177 Diagrams in Rashi’s Commentary: A Case Study of Eruvin 56b By: ELI GENAUER Book illustrations serve multiple purposes. Some are ornamental and, in the case of the Hebrew book, such ornamentation fell under the impera- tive of zeh keli ve-anvehu (Ex. 15:2) to beautify ritual objects.1 Other illus- trations serve a more utilitarian purpose, elucidation and explanation of the text. The first printed Hebrew book to utilize illustrations to elucidate the text (and not for ornamental use) was likely Moses of Coucey’s Sefer Mitzvot Gedolot printed in Rome prior to 1480.2 Of course, explanatory illustrations are not an invention of printing; many medieval commenta- tors make use of this convention. While these illustrations can prove in- valuable in elucidating an otherwise opaque text, in some instances they create more confusion than they assist. In part, however, the failure of these illustrations to explain the text, can, in some instances, be traced to the vagaries of printing rather than to a careless commentator. I would like to thank Dr. Peggy Pearlstein, Dr. Ann Brener and Sharon Horo- witz of the Library of Congress, and Dr. Ezra Chwat of the Israel National Li- brary, for their assistance in helping me obtain much of the source material for this article. I would also like to thank Dan Rabinowitz for his invaluable assis- tance in creating this piece. 1 See, e.g., Abraham M. Habermann, “The Jewish Art of the Printed Book,” in Jewish Art An Illustrated History, rev. ed. Bezalel Narkiss, New York Graphic So- ciety Ltd., Greenwich, Conn.:1971, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Beruriah and Rachel: Two Women in the Talmud
    1 BERURIAH AND RACHEL: TWO WOMEN IN THE TALMUD BERURIAH It is not very often that we find the name of a woman mentioned in the Talmud. Beruriah was one such exception, a great Jewish woman whose wisdom, piety, and learning inspire us to this day. Beruriah lived about one hundred years after the destruction of the Second Temple, which occurred in the year 70 CE. She was the daughter of the great Rabbi Chananiah ben Teradion, who was one of the "Ten Martyrs" whom the Romans killed for spreading the teachings of the Torah among the Jewish people. Beruriah was not only the daughter of a great man but was also the wife of an equally great sage, the saintly Rabbi Meir, one of the most important teachers of the Mishnah. The Talmud tells us many stories about Beruriah. She studied three hundred matters pertaining to Halachah (Jewish law) every day, which would be quite an amazing feat for any scholar. Thus, the Sages frequently asked her views regarding matters of law, especially those laws which applied to women. For instance, the Sages had different opinions about the law of purity and asked Beruriah for her opinion. Rabbi Judah sided with her and recognized her authority. There was another case where there was a dispute between Beruriah and her brother. One of the greatest authorities was asked to judge the case and he said: "Rabbi Chananiah's daughter Beruriah is a greater scholar than his son." Beruriah was very well versed in the Holy Scriptures and could quote from them with ease.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing for Enduring Disagreements an Omer Reflection Guide
    Preparing for Enduring Disagreements An Omer Reflection Guide Curiosity Humility Honor Patience Equanimity Silence Truth The Journey Towards Revelation The period of the Omer marks the time between two peak moments in the history of the Jewish people. Passover celebrates the Israelites’ exodus from Egypt. Shavuot marks the moment when the Torah was revealed to us at Mount Sinai. The Omer, then, represents the long period of wandering that was necessary to bring us from freedom to revelation. The Israelites emerged from Egypt as slaves, with constricted spirits. The gift of Torah would have been wasted on them had it been delivered immediately after they crossed the sea to escape Pharaoh’s chariots. Instead, they needed time to wander, to prepare themselves both individually and as a community, to enter into a different relationship with God, and to hear the Truth that was delivered at Sinai. The Omer is traditionally a time for serious reflection and personal preparation. Among other things, during this period we mourn the loss of Rabbi Akiva’s 24,000 students, who were struck by a plague because they did not deal respectfully with one another. For lack of constructive, respectful disagreement, a great deal of Torah was lost. We are told that when Torah was delivered at Sinai, each person present heard God differently, but that nonetheless, the different revelations were all true – and all originated from God. This Spring, we will be working as a community to prepare ourselves for the celebration of this multifaceted revelation by studying the Jewish art of constructive disagreement.
    [Show full text]
  • SYNOPSIS the Mishnah and Tosefta Are Two Related Works of Legal
    SYNOPSIS The Mishnah and Tosefta are two related works of legal discourse produced by Jewish sages in Late Roman Palestine. In these works, sages also appear as primary shapers of Jewish law. They are portrayed not only as individuals but also as “the SAGES,” a literary construct that is fleshed out in the context of numerous face-to-face legal disputes with individual sages. Although the historical accuracy of this portrait cannot be verified, it reveals the perceptions or wishes of the Mishnah’s and Tosefta’s redactors about the functioning of authority in the circles. An initial analysis of fourteen parallel Mishnah/Tosefta passages reveals that the authority of the Mishnah’s SAGES is unquestioned while the Tosefta’s SAGES are willing at times to engage in rational argumentation. In one passage, the Tosefta’s SAGES are shown to have ruled hastily and incorrectly on certain legal issues. A broader survey reveals that the Mishnah also contains a modest number of disputes in which the apparently sui generis authority of the SAGES is compromised by their participation in rational argumentation or by literary devices that reveal an occasional weakness of judgment. Since the SAGES are occasionally in error, they are not portrayed in entirely ideal terms. The Tosefta’s literary construct of the SAGES differs in one important respect from the Mishnah’s. In twenty-one passages, the Tosefta describes a later sage reviewing early disputes. Ten of these reviews involve the SAGES. In each of these, the later sage subjects the dispute to further analysis that accords the SAGES’ opinion no more a priori weight than the opinion of individual sages.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Depths: Healthcare Professionals in the Trenches
    From the Depths: Healthcare Professionals in the Trenches Workshop at “When the Healer Needs Healing: Illness and the Bikur Cholim Response 27th Annual Conference on Visiting the Sick The Rabbi Isaac N. Trainin Bikur Cholim Coordinating Council of JBFCS November 9, 2014/16 Heshvan 5775 At UJA-Federation of New York ******* Some Materials for Our Exploration Selected and organized by Rabbi Simkha Y. Weintraub, LCSW Rabbinic Director, Jewish Board of Family and Children’s Services Contents: pp. 3-7: Anger pp. 8-9: Dealing with Difficult People pp. 10-12 Truth-Telling p. 13 Helping People Ask for Help p. 14 The Physician and the Patient 1 The St.Vincents “Jewish Healing Torah Study Group for Doctors” Out of a very well-received conference on “Religion, Spirituality, & Medicine” at St. Vincents Hospital and Medical Center in New York in June 1998, a monthly Jewish Healing Torah Study Group for Doctors began in November 1998, initially involving 12-15 doctors in an hour-long exploration over lunch. The group grew to attract 18-20 health care professionals, roughly half doctors and the remainder nurses, chaplains, and/or administrators. For each meeting, Rabbi Simkha Y.Weintraub, LCSW, Rabbinic Director of the New York Jewish Healing Center, brought Jewish texts from across the centuries that touch on issues identified by the participants, using these texts as triggers for discussing very real, contemporary challenges in health care provision. Following each session, participants suggest themes or foci for upcoming meetings. Noted below are
    [Show full text]
  • Sages and Cities: Rabbinic Urbanism and Roman Spatial Practices
    In their articulation of the Sabbath Boundary rules (teh.um Shabbat), the rabbis permit Jews to change the area permissible for walking on this holy day at the last minute if Romans march on the city (Palestinian Talmud, Eruvin 3:5, 21b). Nevertheless, these Sabbath Boundary rules themselves seem to have been formed in close correspondence with Roman practices pertaining to urban boundaries. In comparing the rabbinic teh.um Shabbat system with Roman land survey and urban planning, I argue that the correspondence between the two cultures Sages and Cities: challenges our misconceptions of Jews and Romans as entirely distinct from and antago- Rabbinic Urbanism nistic toward one another. The Roman constitution of imperial and Roman territory through urban boundaries expressed Spatial Practices Rome’s power over its provinces. Rome’s conquered land was its own to divide and distribute — a strictly imperial prerogative. Gil P. Klein What does it mean, then, that the rabbis take for themselves this prerogative and divide the empire’s territories in their institution of Jewish ritual space? Furthermore, what does it mean that they do so in specifically Roman ways? In this study, I compare various itera- tions of tractate Eruvin in the Mishnah, Tosefta, and Palestinian Talmud (produced in Roman Palestine) with works by the Roman architect Vitruvius, as well as the illustrated manuals of Roman land surveyors. The latter were written in Latin between the first and fifth centuries CE and collected in what came to be called the Corpus Agrimensorum Romanorum. Hence, these Roman and rabbinic texts are roughly contem- poraneous.
    [Show full text]
  • Antipodal Texts: B. Eruvin 21B-22A and Mark 7:1-23 on the Tradition of the Elders and the Commandment of God
    Antipodal Texts: B. Eruvin 21b-22a and Mark 7:1-23 on the Tradition of the Elders and the Commandment of God The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Cohen, Shaye J.D. 2013. Antipodal texts: B. Eruvin 21b-22a and Mark 7:1-23 on the tradition of the elders and the commandment of God. Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, Harvard University, preprint. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10861156 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Antipodal Texts: B. Eruvin 21b–22a and Mark 7:1–23 on the Tradition of the Elders and the Commandment of God SHAYE J.D. COHEN Recent years have seen intense scholarly discussion on the cultural setting of the Babylonian Talmud (the Bavli), in particular the Bavli’s relationship with Persian and Greek, Sassanid culture and Hellenism, and Mesopotamian Christianity and the cultures of the eastern Roman 1 empire. Mesopotamia in the second century CE and onwards had a * This essay has been much improved by the comments, suggestions, and bibliographical assistance of my friends Richard Kalmin, Laura Nasrallah, and Jeffrey Rubenstein; my thanks too to the editor Annette Yoshiko Reed for her insightful suggestions. To save space I present the primary texts only in translation. Lest I be misunderstood, I would like to state explicitly that at no point in this paper do I intend to make any claim about the historical Jesus or the historical Pharisees.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on the Exemption of Women from Time-Bound Commandments
    JᴜᴅᴀIᴄᴀ: Nᴇᴜᴇ ᴅIGIᴛᴀᴌᴇ FᴏᴌGᴇ 1 (2020) https://doi.org/10.36950/jndf.1.4 c b – ᴄᴄ BY 4.0 Law, Hierarchy, and Gender: Reflections on the Exemption of Women from Time-Bound Commandments Valérie Rhein Universität Luzern [email protected] Abstract: Why do the tannaim exempt women from time-bound commandments (m. Qid­ dushin 1:7)? In this paper it is argued that the unequal levels of obligation for men and women in rabbinic Judaism creates a hierarchy of mitzvot between them that mimics and virtually replaces the earlier biblical hierarchy of mitzvot between priests and Israel. In both constellations the rabbis consider the obligation to fulfill more commandments to be a privilege. The similarity between the hierarchies priests–Israel and men–women becomes apparent when the selection of commandments from which the tannaim and the amoraim explicitly exempt women are examined more closely: Many of them – the time-bound commandments shofar, lulav, tzitzit, tefillin, and shema as well as the non-time-bound mitzvah of Torah study – share a common feature, namely, their function as “ersatz Temple rituals.” During the transition from a Temple- oriented, priest-based Judaism to a study-oriented rabbinic Judaism, rituals such as these played a crucial role. Judaism is a religion of time aiming at the sanctification of time.¹ What is the difference between a Jewish man and a Jewish woman? From the perspective of observance and ritual practice, the answer is: In rabbinic Judaism, men are obligated, as a rule, to fulfill all the commandments, while women are not. This distinction between the sexes is based on a rabbinic principle handed down in the Mishnah in tractate Qiddushin: ­the men are obli—[ לכ תוצמ השע ןמזהש המרג ] All positive time-related obligations gated and the women are exempt, and all positive commandments not time-related both men and women are obligated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theoretical Symbolism of Eruvin: a Model of Dual-Identity and Sacred Space
    University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 6-1-2012 The Theoretical Symbolism of Eruvin: A Model of Dual-Identity and Sacred Space Liza Stoltz Hanson University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the Jewish Studies Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Hanson, Liza Stoltz, "The Theoretical Symbolism of Eruvin: A Model of Dual-Identity and Sacred Space" (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 268. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/268 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. THE THEORETICAL SYMBOLISM OF ERUVIN: A Model of Dual-Identity and Sacred Space __________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Arts and Humanities University of Denver __________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts __________ by Liza Stoltz Hanson June 2012 Advisor: Gregory A. Robbins, PhD Author: Liza Stoltz Hanson Title: THE THEORETICAL SYMBOLISM OF ERUVIN: A Model of Dual Identity and Sacred Space Advisor: Gregory A. Robbins, PhD Degree Date: June 2012 ABSTRACT Eruvin are an innovative solution to the logistical “problem” of carrying on the weekly Sabbath. Boundaries that symbolically extend the walls of private homes into the public sphere, eruvin allow Orthodox Jews to carry objects outside of their homes on the Sabbath, a seemingly simple act that would otherwise be prohibited.
    [Show full text]