DOCSLIB.ORG

Linking Russia to the ERA: Coordination of MS'/AC' S&T

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Linking Russia to the ERA: Coordination of MS'/AC' S&T ERA.Net RUS – FP7-226164 Linking Russia to the ERA: Coordination of MS’/AC’ S&T programmes towards and with Russia Deliverable Title D 1.1.1 – The Russian S&T system Deliverable Lead: CNRS Related Work package: WP1 – Preparing the analytical ground for coordinating EU MS’/AC S&T and innovation programmes towards Russia or with Russian programme owners Author(s): Archimedes, CNRS, HSE, ICISTE, KIAE, ZSI Dissemination level: Public Due submission date: 31/05/2009 Actual submission: 30/09/2010 Project Number FP7-226164 Instrument: Coordination Action (CA) Start date of Project: 01/02/2009 Duration: 48 months Project funded by the European Community under the International Cooperation activity of the Capacities Programme of the 7th European Framework Programme for RTD (FP7). D1.1 The Russian S&T system, draft report Page 1 of 198 ERA.Net RUS – FP7-226164 Abstract This report was prepared in the frame of the ERA.Net-RUS project. Partners from the Higher School of Economics (HSE), the International Centre for Innovations in Science, Technology and Education (ICISTE) and the Russian Research Centre – Kurchatov Institute (KIAE) contributed to the report, as well as the Archimedes Foundation, the Centre for Social Innovation (ZSI) and the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS). The report is aimed at raising the awareness of the European R&D policy makers and programme owners on the Russian S&T system, in view of future joint activities targeting and with Russia. Versioning and Contribution History Version Date Modification reason Modified by v.01 25/06/2009 Draft CNRS v.02 24/07/2009 Draft CNRS Fill in missing contributions, CNRS, Archimedes, v.03 21/09/2009 Internal consistency HSE, KIAE, ICISTE CNRS, ZSI, HSE, v.04 18/12/2009 Draft ICISTE, Archimedes Final draft to be uploaded on the v.05 19/01/2010 CNRS, HSE website Final draft with comments from v.06 25/05/2010 CNRS,HSE, KIAE, ZSI the workshop in Moscow Final 30/09/2010 Final draft CNRS D1.1 The Russian S&T system, draft report Page 2 of 198 ERA.Net RUS – FP7-226164 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................ 5 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 9 1 S&T STRATEGY AND GOVERNANCE ........................................................... 13 1.1 National priorities in S&T.........................................................................................14 1.2 Legal basis for S&T policy.......................................................................................23 1.3 Governmental and other S&T decision-making bodies........................................26 2 S&T LANDSCAPE............................................................................................ 34 2.1 Scientific Excellence in Russia ...............................................................................35 2.2 Research and Innovation Infrastructures ..............................................................38 2.3 Human potential .......................................................................................................48 2.4 Geographical distribution & regional research potential .....................................51 2.5 Distribution between education and research.......................................................52 2.6 Organisation of public and private sector .............................................................57 2.7 Effects and Efficiency of reforms in the S&T sector.............................................62 2.8 Output indicators: number of publications and patents.......................................69 3 MAIN ACTORS IMPLEMENTING S&T POLICY AND PERFORMING R&D.... 73 3.1 Actors implementing S&T policy at federal level ..................................................73 3.2 Main actors at regional level ...................................................................................80 3.3 S&T funding organisations......................................................................................83 3.4 State corporations..................................................................................................101 3.5 Research performers .............................................................................................112 4. INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION................................................................... 122 4.1 S&T cooperation agreements .....................................................................................122 4.2 International programmes and initiatives ..................................................................124 4.3 Indicators ......................................................................................................................143 D1.1 The Russian S&T system, draft report Page 3 of 198 ERA.Net RUS – FP7-226164 5. CONCLUSIONS.............................................................................................. 148 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................... 151 ANNEX 1 : LIST OF TECHNOLOGIES CRITICAL FOR THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ........................................................................................................ 158 ANNEX 2 : LIST OF THE 12 MAJOR INNOVATION PROJECTS OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE, CONTRACTED IN 2003............................................................... 160 ANNEX 3 : OBJECTIVES OF MES IN RUSSIA ................................................... 161 ANNEX 4 : OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES IN RUSSIA ....... 163 ANNEX 5 : UNIQUE INSTALLATIONS CREATED AT INSTITUTIONS OF DIFFERENT BRANCHES OF RAS........................................................................ 177 ANNEX 6 : NEW RESEARCH TECHNOLOGIES IN RUSSIAN REGIONS........... 180 ANNEX 7 : LEADING INDUSTRIAL SECTORS AND R&D INVESTEMENT IN RUSSIAN REGIONS.............................................................................................. 185 ANNEX 8 : RAS FACTS & FIGURES ON FUNDING ACTIVITIES BY SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES ......................................................................................................... 193 ANNEX 9 : RAS AGREEMENTS ON INTERNATIONAL S&T COOPERATION... 195 ANNEX 10 : RUSSIAN BUSINESS GROUPS AND MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES (CASES)................................................................................................................. 197 D1.1 The Russian S&T system, draft report Page 4 of 198 ERA.Net RUS – FP7-226164 Executive Summary As a global player on the political and economic stage and as the European Union’s largest direct neighbouring country, Russia is considered as one of the main strategic international partners of the EU. According to the Country Strategy Paper 2007-2013 of the European Commission for the Russian Federation, “EU cooperation with Russia is conceived in terms of, and is designed to strengthen, a strategic partnership founded on shared interests and common values.” One of the main objectives of the EU-Russia roadmap for a common space of Research and Education is “to support joint elaboration and harmonization efforts for the creation of a EU/Russia common space in the field of research.” The EU-Russian S&T agreement which was renewed on 30 March 2009 is one of the major legal frameworks at Community level. The 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (FP7), and especially its ERANET scheme of the specific programme “Capacities”, also provide useful instruments for addressing the joint interests of EU and Russian S&T programme owners and for planning a sustainable S&T programme for mutual benefit. The first task of the ERANET-RUS project’s work programme is to prepare the analytical ground for coordinating EU MS´/AC´ S&T and innovation programmes towards Russia or with Russian programme owners. In this respect the present analytical report provides an overview of the structure of S&T in Russia, Russian strengths and national priorities in S&T; main S&T institutions, present state of international cooperation with emphasis on EU MS/AC. The main conclusions of the present report are the following : 1. Economic background Russia’s economic structure is very different from most European countries – there is a predominance of large companies, focused on mining and heavy industry, and an almost complete lack of high-tech and consumer goods industries. Therefore Russia’s innovation system also has quite distinctive characteristics. Historically, Russia, as part of the former Soviet Union, has been characterized by a developed system of public R&D institutes. During the transitional period, this sector of the innovation system experienced severe trouble: low level of financial support from the State budget and industry, decreasing salaries for scientists and engineers and de facto stagnation of the R&D activity. Overall, the major characteristics of the R&D system in Russia are1: • 61% of funding comes from the federal budget (2006). Starting from 2002, its share is growing annually. • 73% of organisations conducting R&D are state-owned (they are in federal property). • 77% of all R&D personnel work in state-owned R&D organisations. 1. National Innovation System and State Innovation Policy of the Russian Federation. Background Report to the OECD Country Review of the Russian Innovation Policy. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation , Moscow, 2009 D1.1 The Russian S&T system, draft report Page 5 of 198 ERA.Net
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Innovation Performance Review of Kazakhstan
    UNECE UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Innovationn Innovation Performance Performance o I n i n o v Review a t i o Reviewt The Innovation Performance Review contains the n P e findings of a participatory policy advisory service r f undertaken at the request of the national authorities. o rm It considers possible policy actions aimed at a a stimulating innovation activity in the country, n c enhancing its innovation capacity and improving the e R efficiency of the national innovation system. e v i e w This publication is part of an ongoing series - K a highlighting some of the results of the UNECE v z Subprogramme on Economic Cooperation and a k Integration. The objective of the Subprogramme is to h s t promote a policy, financial and regulatory a environment conducive to economic growth, n knowledge-based development and higher o competitiveness in the UNECE region. n UNITED NA KAZAKHSTAN n TIONS I UNITED NATIONS United Nations Economic Commission for Europe INNOVATION PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF KAZAKHSTAN UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2012 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This volume is issued in English and Russian only. ECE/CECI/14 Copyright © United Nations, 2012 All right reserved Printed at United Nations, Geneva (Switzerland) UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATIONS iii FOREWORD The Innovation Performance Review of Kazakhstan continues the series of national assessments of innovation policies initiated by the pilot Innovation Performance Review of Belarus.
    [Show full text]
  • I. ANNEX – Country Reports
    I. ANNEX – Country Reports 97 State of Affairs of Science, Technology and Innovation Policies 97 I.1 Country Report Armenia in cooperation and coordination with other concerned ministries and organisations. In order to improve policy-making and promote the coordination in the field of S&T, in October 2007 the government decided to establish the State Commit- tee of Science empowered to carry out integrated S&T policy in the country. This structure is answerable to the Ministry of Education and Science, but with wider power of independent activity. The Committee is also responsible for the development and implementation of research programmes in the country through three main I.1.1 Current State of S&T & Major financing mechanisms: thematic (project based) financ- Policy Challenges ing, basic financing and special purpose projects73. The law on the National Academy of Sciences of Arme- I.1.1.1 S&T Indicators nia (NAS RA) was adopted by Parliament on 14 April, 2011, which assigned to it the status of highest self- TABLE 5: S&T LANDSCAPE 201072 governing state organisation and empowered it to coor- dinate and carry out basic and applied research directed R&D Number of Number of to the creation of a knowledge-based economy, and Expenditure research researchers the social and cultural development of the country. This as % of GDP organisations Law gave more power to the Academy and its research institutes in carrying out business activities towards the 0.27 81 5,460 commercialisation of R&D outcomes and the creation of spin-offs. I.1.1.2 Research Structure and Policy In May 2010, the Government adopted the Strategy A pressing challenge for Armenia is the reformation on Development of Science in Armenia, which outlined of its S&T and innovation system in accordance with the state policy towards the development of science the requirements of the market economy and needs of from 2011 to 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Adjustment and Polarisation of Russia's Cities
    Uneven urban resilience: the economic adjustment and polarisation of Russia's cities Oleg Golubchikov, Cardiff University1 Alla Makhrova, Moscow State University Anna Badyina, University of Southampton Isolde Brade, Leibniz Institute for Regional Geography Published as: Golubchikov, O., Makhrova, A., Badyina, A. and Brade, I. (2015). Uneven urban resilience: the economic adjustment and polarization of Russia's cities. In: Lang, T. et al. (eds.) Understanding Geographies of Polarization and Peripheralization: Perspectives from Central and Eastern Europe and Beyond. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 270-284. Introduction The multidimensional processes of transition to a market economy have produced a radical rupture to the previous development of Russian cities. Many factors driving urban change under the Soviet system, both of ideological and material nature, have lost their legitimacy or significance under the capitalist regime of accumulation and regulation. Thus, no longer perceived as a purpose-built machine for a meaningful evolution to a fair and egalitarian communist society as before, each city has been exposed to the ideology of the free market and pushed to acquire a new niche in the nexus of global and local capitalist flows. Not all cities equally succeeded in this endeavour. Indeed, already under the conditions of general economic disorganisation and harsh economic downturn introduced by the poorly performed neoliberal reforms of the early 1990s, different urban regions started demonstrating divergent trajectories of their economic performance, including severe marginalisation and peripheralisation by some and more successful adaptation by others. Those processes of initial spatial differentiation have proven to become self-perpetuating even under the conditions of ‘restorative’ growth experienced in Russia between 1998 and 2008, as well as the ensuring period of more bumpy economic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Science Cities Fostering Firm Innovation?
    PRELIMINARY AND INCOMPLETE – DO NOT CITE Are Science Cities Fostering Firm Innovation? Evidence from Russia’s Regions 1 Helena Schweiger Paolo Zacchia European Bank for Reconstruction and University of California – Berkeley Development [email protected] [email protected] February 2015 Abstract: Using a mixture of data from the recent regionally representative Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey (BEEPS) in Russia as well as municipal level data, we find that there are significant differences in innovation activity of firms and cities across the Russian regions. We investigate whether this could be explained by the proximity to science cities – towns with a high concentration of research and development facilities, as well as human capital. They were selected and given this status in a largely random way during Soviet times. We match the science and non-science cities on their historic and geographical characteristics and compare the innovation activity (R&D, product and process innovation) of firms in science cities with the innovation activity of similar-in-the-observables firms in similar, non-science cities. Preliminary evidence suggests that firms located in science cities were more likely to engage in product and process innovation than firms located in similar, non-science cities. The results have important policy implications because many countries in the world, including developing countries, have been introducing science parks or other areas of innovation, viewing them as a type of silver bullet with the capability of dramatically improving a country’s ability to compete in the global economy and help the country to grow. JEL Classification: O33, O38, O14 Keywords: Innovation, Russia, science cities 1 We would like to thank Natalya Volchkova, Sergei Guriev and Maria Gorban for helpful discussions and Irina Capita, Jan Lukšič, Alexander Stepanov and Maria Vasilenko for excellent research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long-Run Effects of R&D Place-Based Policies
    The long-run effects of R&D place-based policies: Evidence from Russian Science Cities* Helena Schweiger† Alexander Stepanov‡ Paolo Zacchia§ December 2017 Abstract We study the long-run effects of historical place-based policies targeting R&D: the creation of Science Cities in former Soviet Russia. The establishment of Science Cities and the criteria for selecting their location were largely guided by political and military-strategic consider- ations. We compare current demographic and economic characteristics of Science Cities to those of appropriately matched localities that were similar to them at the time of their establishment. We find that in the modern Russian economy, despite the massive cuts of governmental support to R&D that followed the dissolution of the USSR, Science Cities host more high-skilled workers and more developed R&D and ICT sectors; are the origin of more international patents; and generally appear to be more productive and economically de- veloped. Within a spatial equilibrium framework, we interpret these findings as the result of the interaction between persistence and agglomeration forces. Furthermore, we rule out alternative explanations that have to do with the differential use of public resources, and we find limited support for a case of equilibrium reversion. Finally, by analyzing firm-level data we obtain evidence in favor of spillover effects with a wide spatial breadth. *We would like to thank Ralph de Haas, Sergei Guriev, Maria Gorban, Denis Ivanov, Sergei Izmalkov, Patrick Kline, Olga Kuzmina, Andrei Markeevich, Enrico Moretti, Gérard Roland and Natalya Volchkova for helpful discussions, as well as the participants at the SITE Academic Conference: 25 years of transition, 8th MEIDE conference, 2015 PacDev conference, 17th IEA World Congress, 16th Uddevalla Symposium, 2nd World Congress of Comparative Economics, XVIII HSE April International Academic Conference, 2017 Barcelona Workshop on Regional and Urban Economics and seminars at the EBRD, Higher School of Eco- nomics, New Economic School, U.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Hegemonía Y Disidencia
    M ONOGRÁFICO Comunicación y prácticas culturales emergentes frente al imaginario neoliberal: hegemonía y disidencia DEPARTAMENTO DE PERIODISMO I (UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA) M ONOGRÁFICO Comunicación y prácticas culturales emergentes frente al imaginario neoliberal: hegemonía y disidencia DEPARTAMENTO DE PERIODISMO I (UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA) REVISTA CIENTÍFICA DE INFORMACIÓN Y COMUNICACIÓN IC REVIsta CIENTÍFICA DE INFORMación Y COMunicación es una publicación interdisciplinar y de periodicidad anual, que sale a la luz regularmente cada diciembre. Contribuye a la difusión de investigaciones en el ámbito de la comunicación social. Está editada por el DEPARTAMENTO DE PERIODISMO I de la Universidad de Sevilla y el Secretariado de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla. La Revista IC se encuentra en los siguientes índices de Calidad e Indexación: Índices de Impacto IN-RECS (Índice de Impacto de las Revistas Españolas de Ciencias Sociales) RESH (Revistas Españolas de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades) Índices de Calidad MIAR (Sistema para medir cuantitativamente la visibilidad de las publicaciones periódicas en Ciencias Sociales) CIRC (Clasificación Integrada de Revistas Científicas) Bases de Datos EBSCO (Fuente Académica Premier). ISOC (Bases de Datos bibliográficas del CSIC – Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades) DICE (Difusión y Calidad Editorial De Las Revistas Españolas de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales Y Jurídicas) DIALNET (Servicio de alertas sobre Publicaciones de Contenido Científico) JOURNALSEEK (Base de datos por categorías de información de la revista) ULRICHS (Base de datos bibliográfico de publicaciones periódicas) DOAJ (Directorio de Revistas de Acceso Abierto) LATINDEX (Sistema Regional de Información en línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal) Repositorios y directorios DULCINEA (Derechos de copyright y condiciones de auto-archivo de Revistas Científicas Españolas) Toda correspondencia debe dirigirse a: IC REVIsta CIENTÍFICA DE INFORMación Y COMunicación - Departamento de Periodismo 1 Facultad de Comunicación Avda.
    [Show full text]
  • SAPERE AU D E Freedom, Legal Consciousness, Ethics
    25 years of civic education SAPERE AUDE Freedom, Legal Consciousness, Ethics Segovia, June 13–17, 2018 Association of Schools of Political Studies of the Council of Europe In memory of Arseny Roginsky El Rancho de la Aldegüela, Torrecaballeros (Segovia) in collaboration with Valsaín Foundation (Fundación Valsaín para la promoción y defensa de los valores democráticos) Wednesday 13 June DEMOCRACY, R U LE OF LAW, AND ETHICS 09.45–10.30 Opening session 15.30–17.00 Session: Lena Nemirovskaya Democracy, Rule of Law and Values in the Founder, Moscow School of Civic Education Digital Society Álvaro Gil-Robles Tomás de la Quadra-Salcedo Commissioner for Human Rights of Council of Europe (1999–2006), President of the Valsaín Foundation 17.00–17.30 Coffee break Vladimir Lukin Human Rights Commissioner of Russia (2004–2014), 17.30–19.00 Session: president of the Russian Paralympic Committee Authoritarian Regime and Russian Society Javier López-Escobar Tatiana Vorozheikina Regional Delegate, Regional Community of Castilla y León 19.00–19.30 Coffee break 10.30–12.00 Session: Can We Get Democracy Without Values? Álvaro Gil-Robles 19.30–21.30 Round table: The Rule of Law. What Rule? What Law? 12.00–12.30 Coffee break Alexander Shmelev 12.30–14.00 Session: 21.30 Dinner Securing Identity – Estonia’s Return to Europe Riina Kaljurand 14.00–15.30 Lunch 4 / 5 Thursday 14 June Friday 15 June POLITICS, ECONOMY, S OCIETY, AND ETHICS THE RULE OF LAW, AND ETHICS 10.00–11.30 Session: 9.30–11.30 Session: The Language of Propaganda Aristotle and Plato: the Idea of
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Development in Russia
    Russian-German Environmental Information Bureau Russisch-Deutsches Büro für Umweltinformation Sustainable Development in Russia edited by Sergei Bobylev and Renat Perelet Sustainable Developtment in Russia Sustainable Developtment Sustainable Development in Russia edited by Sergei Bobylev and Renat Perelet Berlin–St. Petersburg 2013 Contents Forewords 4 1. Economic, political and institutional frameworks 1.1. Sustainable development and the “green economy” in Russia: the current situation, problems and perspectives | Sergei Bobylev, Renat Perelet 11 1.2. Legal Aspects: The state of legislation and legal practice | Ekaterina Khmeleva 18 1.3. Certifi cation and standardisation | Semyon Gordyshevsky, Yulia Grachyova, Anna Matyagina 22 1.4. Oversight and supervision of compliance with environmental legislation and environmental standards in the Russian Federation: a summary of judicial practice | Nina Popravko 28 2. Economic prerequisites for sustainable development and environmental economics 2.1. The energy sector in the context of sustainable development. Greening of the oil and gas sector problems and perspectives | Alexei Knizhnikov 37 2.2. Energy effi ciency: legislation, state policy and economic and business practice | Yevgeny Gasho, Maria Stepanova 42 2.3. Renewable energy: legislation, state support and business and civil society initiatives | Ivan Yegorov 52 2.4. The industrial sector and problems of economic development | Alexander Shabaldin 63 2.5. The waste management sector: the current situation, legislative framework, regional experience, perspectives and civil society initiatives | Marina Asadcheva, Anna Sycheva 70 3. Sustainable development of cities and regions 3.1. City and regional planning: problems of city growth, urban ecology, perspectives for sustainable urban development and civil society initiatives | Daniyar Yusupov 79 3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Urbanization in the Soviet and Post-Soviet Eras
    INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT UNITED NATIONS POPULATION FUND URBANIZATION AND EMERGING POPULATION ISSUES WORKING PAPER 9 Russian urbanization in the Soviet and post-Soviet eras by CHARLES BECKER, S JOSHUA MENDELSOHN and POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT BRANCH KSENIYA BENDERSKAYA NOVEMBER 2012 HUMAN SETTLEMENTS GROUP Russian urbanization in the Soviet and post-Soviet eras Charles Becker, S Joshua Mendelsohn and Kseniya Benderskaya November 2012 i ABOUT THE AUTHORS Charles M. Becker Department of Economics Duke University Durham, NC 27708-0097 USA [email protected] S Joshua Mendelsohn Department of Sociology Duke University Durham, NC 27708-0088 USA [email protected] Kseniya A. Benderskaya Department of Urban Planning and Design Harvard University Cambridge, MA 02138 USA [email protected] Acknowledgements: We have benefited from excellent research assistance from Ganna Tkachenko, and are grateful to Greg Brock, Timothy Heleniak, and Serguey Ivanov for valuable discussions and advice. Above all, the BRICS urbanization series editors, Gordon McGranahan and George Martine, provided a vast number of thought-provoking comments and caught even more errors and inconsistencies. Neither they, nor the others gratefully acknowledged, bear any responsibility for remaining flaws. © IIED 2012 Human Settlements Group International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) 80-86 Gray’s Inn Road London WC1X 8NH, UK Tel: 44 20 3463 7399 Fax: 44 20 3514 9055 ISBN: 978-1-84369-896-8 This paper can be downloaded free of charge from http://www.iied.org/pubs/display.php?o=10613IIED. A printed version of this paper is also available from Earthprint for US$20 (www.earthprint.com) Disclaimer: The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed here do not represent the views of any organisations that have provided institutional, organisational or financial support for the preparation of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Infotainment on Russian TV As a Tool of Desacralization of Soviet Myths and Creation of a Myth About the Future
    Infotainment on Russian TV as a tool of desacralization of Soviet myths and creation of a myth about the future El infoentretenimiento en la televisión rusa como medio para desacralizar los mitos soviéticos y crear un mito sobre el futuro Anna A. Novikova (National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Rusia) [[email protected]] E-ISSN: 2173-1071 IC – Revista Científica de Información y Comunicación 2014, 11, pp. 229 - 244 Abstract This paper deals with the process of incorporation of “infotainment” in the Russian television industry. Professional journalism is analyzed as a tool for the interpretation of facts, which have contributed to erode the myths of mass consciousness, which were formed by Soviet propaganda. According to the author, television news and other infotainment programs have affected socio-cultural processes in Russia; in particular, they have contributed to shaping the worldview of post-Soviet intellectuals, known as the “new intelligentsia”. Resumen Este artículo trata principalmente el proceso de incorporación del “infoentretenimiento” en la industria televisiva rusa. El periodismo profesional se considera como un medio para la interpretación de los hechos que ha contribuido a erosionar los mitos de la conciencia de masas configurados por la propaganda soviética. Según la hipótesis defendida por la autora, las noticias de televisión y otros programas de infoentretenimiento han influido notablemente en procesos socio-culturales en Rusia, en concreto, en la formación de la visión del mundo de los intelectuales post-soviéticos, también llamados la “nueva intelectualidad”. Keywords Russian television, infotainment, social myths, the discourse of intellectuals Palabras clave Televisión rusa, infoentretenimiento, mitos sociales, el discurso de los intelectuales Recibido: 10/06/2014 Aceptado: 05/09/2014 230 Anna A.
    [Show full text]
  • Infotainment on Russian TV As a Tool of Desacralization of Soviet Myths and Creation of a Myth About the Future
    Infotainment on Russian TV as a tool of desacralization of Soviet myths and creation of a myth about the future El infoentretenimiento en la televisión rusa como medio para desacralizar los mitos soviéticos y crear un mito sobre el futuro Anna A. Novikova (National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Rusia) [[email protected]] E-ISSN: 2173-1071 IC – Revista Científica de Información y Comunicación 2014, 11, pp. 229 - 244 Abstract This paper deals with the process of incorporation of “infotainment” in the Russian television industry. Professional journalism is analyzed as a tool for the interpretation of facts, which have contributed to erode the myths of mass consciousness, which were formed by Soviet propaganda. According to the author, television news and other infotainment programs have affected socio-cultural processes in Russia; in particular, they have contributed to shaping the worldview of post-Soviet intellectuals, known as the “new intelligentsia”. Resumen Este artículo trata principalmente el proceso de incorporación del “infoentretenimiento” en la industria televisiva rusa. El periodismo profesional se considera como un medio para la interpretación de los hechos que ha contribuido a erosionar los mitos de la conciencia de masas configurados por la propaganda soviética. Según la hipótesis defendida por la autora, las noticias de televisión y otros programas de infoentretenimiento han influido notablemente en procesos socio-culturales en Rusia, en concreto, en la formación de la visión del mundo de los intelectuales post-soviéticos, también llamados la “nueva intelectualidad”. Keywords Russian television, infotainment, social myths, the discourse of intellectuals Palabras clave Televisión rusa, infoentretenimiento, mitos sociales, el discurso de los intelectuales Recibido: 10/06/2014 Aceptado: 05/09/2014 230 Anna A.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Monotowns Delgir Maksimova [email protected]
    Master Program in Economic Growth, Innovation and Spatial Dynamics Russian Monotowns Delgir Maksimova [email protected] Abstract: Monofunctional towns of Russia represent the extreme case of specialized settlements where the socio-economic development mostly or fully depends on the performance of one or a few town-forming enterprises. This phenomenon obtained attention after the Soviet Union collapse, which has resulted in worsening of the socio-economic situation in monotowns. However, since the 2000s the differentiation in the development among monofunctional towns was observed. What can condition such differentiation? In this study an attempt to provide a new perspective, through which monotowns can be studied. The analysis is done in the step- wise manner and based on the developed data matrix and taxonomy of monotowns. Key words: monotowns, monofunctional towns, agglomeration, specialization, lock-ins, functional classification EKHM51 Master's Thesis (15 ECTS) June 2015 Supervisor: Karl-Johan Lundquist Examiner: Jonas Ljungberg Word Count: 15 883 Website www.ehl.lu.se TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 1 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. 2 List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. 3 1. Introduction
    [Show full text]