UC Berkeley Dissertations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UC Berkeley Dissertations UC Berkeley Dissertations Title Insuring the City: The Prudential Center and the Reshaping of Boston Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4b75k2nf Author Rubin, Elihu James Publication Date 2009-09-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California University of California Transportation Center UCTC Dissertation No. 149 Insuring the City: The Prudential Center and the Reshaping of Boston Elihu James Rubin University of California, Berkeley Insuring the City: The Prudential Center and the Reshaping of Boston by Elihu James Rubin B.A. (Yale University) 1999 M.C.P. (University of California, Berkeley) 2004 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Paul Groth, Chair Professor Richard Walker Professor C. Greig Crysler Fall 2009 Insuring the City: The Prudential Center and the Reshaping of Boston © 2009 by Elihu James Rubin Abstract Insuring the City: The Prudential Center and the Reshaping of Boston by Elihu James Rubin Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture University of California, Berkeley Professor Paul Groth, Chair Insuring the City examines the development of the Prudential Center in Boston as a case study of the organizational, financial, and spatial forces that large insurance companies wielded in shaping the postwar American city. The Prudential Center was one of seven Regional Home Offices (RHOs) planned by Prudential in the 1950s to decentralize its management. What began as an effort to reinvigorate the company’s bureaucratic makeup evolved into a prominent building program and urban planning phenomenon, promoting the economic prospects of each RHO city and reshaping the geography of the business district. Examples from Los Angeles, Houston, and Chicago show each RHO as a calculated real estate investment. The RHOs were also expressions of the insurance company’s self-image as a benevolent force in American cities and social life. Boston—the location of Prudential’s Northeastern Home Office—was, like other American cities, preoccupied with urban obsolescence and erected a political and legal structure to facilitate redevelopment. Navigating its way through these structures, Prudential became an “urban redevelopment corporation” in its own right. The Pru’s i intended site was a rail yard on the outskirts of the central business district, a site that was also pivotal to the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority’s plans to construct an urban extension. Prudential navigated a triangular relationship with the Pike and the Boston Redevelopment Authority to gain recognition—and favored tax status—as a quasi-public actor in the legislatively sanctioned fight against urban blight. The Pru, dedicated in 1965, hastened the expansion of Boston’s central business district into a second midtown area that was a self-contained enclave organized around the car. Together, the Pike and the Pru planned a massive highway interchange in Boston’s Back Bay district. Prudential’s design choices began with the selection of a “businessman” architect, Charles Luckman, and this study examines Luckman’s bureaucratic design process. Though never been loved by architectural critics, the overall plan of the Prudential Center achieved many of its sponsor’s goals and, in several senses, insured Boston’s future. It instilled the city with new financial confidence and thousands of jobs, protected against physical obsolescence, and invested in the city’s public realm. ii Contents Note on Sources......................................................................................................................... vii! Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................... viii! Introduction: Prudential and the American City ......................................................... 1! The Prudential: “The Rock” and the Urban Landscape ............................................................. 3! From the Octopus to the Mighty Pump........................................................................................ 6! Towers and Islands ...................................................................................................................... 9! Urban Renewal, the Expansion of Downtown, and the Pru ...................................................... 13! Plan of the Dissertation and a Statement on Methods............................................................... 17! Chapter One: Prudential’s Urban Policy for the American City.............................. 20! That Mighty Pump, Prudential .................................................................................................. 21! Corporate purification. ............................................................................... 22! Regulation and real estate........................................................................... 25! Insurance and government. ......................................................................... 27 Break the Whole Thing Up........................................................................................................ 31! Home office, branch office. ......................................................................... 32! Dividends of decentralization...................................................................... 34! An urban institution..................................................................................... 38! Location, location, location......................................................................... 39! Modern Prudential style.............................................................................. 41 ! Mid-Town on the Miracle Mile: Prudential in Los Angeles .................................................... 44! Westward, Ho! “The Shift from Center of Concentration.” ...................... 44! Site selection: The Miracle Mile. ............................................................... 46! The building: Light modern........................................................................ 48 ! Access to Paradise: Houston and the Great Southwest ............................................................ 50! The Great Southwest. .................................................................................. 51! The ideal site. .............................................................................................. 53! Office building de-luxe. ............................................................................... 57! A paradise for office girls............................................................................ 61 ! Thinking Outside the Loop in Chicago ..................................................................................... 62! City salvage. ................................................................................................ 62! A lawyer’s dream......................................................................................... 66! Civic duty..................................................................................................... 68! On spec........................................................................................................ 70! iii Corporate policy, urban policy. .................................................................. 73 ! Chapter Two: “I Hate Boston”: Constraints that Confronted Builders in Boston . 77! Greater Boston: The Rise of an Industrial Region ................................................................... 78! The industrial region................................................................................... 79! Imperial Boston. .......................................................................................... 80! Metropolitan growth.................................................................................... 82 ! “Our Fair City”: The Political Geography of Urban Decline................................................... 85! “Curleyism” and the politics of land use.................................................... 87! The fall of the “Rascal King.”..................................................................... 92! Urban decline and the rise of planning....................................................... 96! The politics of urban renewal.................................................................... 100 ! Banned in Boston: Culture, Capital, and Architecture ........................................................... 110! “Where’s Boston?” Architecture and urban identity............................... 112! Tall buildings in Boston. ........................................................................... 114! Height limits. ............................................................................................. 118! Insurance-Deco and the Back Bay district................................................ 121 ! Dirty Streets: Transportation and Modernization................................................................... 123! The crooked and narrow streets of Boston................................................ 125! Congestion versus metropolitan thoroughfares. ....................................... 128! Postwar highway plans. ............................................................................ 133 ! A Fine Old Painting of Character............................................................................................ 136!
Recommended publications
  • Pittsfield Building 55 E
    LANDMARK DESIGNATION REPORT Pittsfield Building 55 E. Washington Preliminary Landmarkrecommendation approved by the Commission on Chicago Landmarks, December 12, 2001 CITY OFCHICAGO Richard M. Daley, Mayor Departmentof Planning and Developement Alicia Mazur Berg, Commissioner Cover: On the right, the Pittsfield Building, as seen from Michigan Avenue, looking west. The Pittsfield Building's trademark is its interior lobbies and atrium, seen in the upper and lower left. In the center, an advertisement announcing the building's construction and leasing, c. 1927. Above: The Pittsfield Building, located at 55 E. Washington Street, is a 38-story steel-frame skyscraper with a rectangular 21-story base that covers the entire building lot-approximately 162 feet on Washington Street and 120 feet on Wabash Avenue. The Commission on Chicago Landmarks, whose nine members are appointed by the Mayor, was established in 1968 by city ordinance. It is responsible for recommending to the City Council that individual buildings, sites, objects, or entire districts be designated as Chicago Landmarks, which protects them by law. The Comm ission is staffed by the Chicago Department of Planning and Development, 33 N. LaSalle St., Room 1600, Chicago, IL 60602; (312-744-3200) phone; (312­ 744-2958) TTY; (312-744-9 140) fax; web site, http ://www.cityofchicago.org/ landmarks. This Preliminary Summary ofInformation is subject to possible revision and amendment during the designation proceedings. Only language contained within the designation ordinance adopted by the City Council should be regarded as final. PRELIMINARY SUMMARY OF INFORMATION SUBMITIED TO THE COMMISSION ON CHICAGO LANDMARKS IN DECEMBER 2001 PITTSFIELD BUILDING 55 E.
    [Show full text]
  • 1515 Commonwealth Avenue Public Comments Via Website Form 2019-08-07.Xlsx 1
    1515 Commonwealth Avenue Public Comments via website form 2019-08-07.xlsx Date First Name Last Name Organization Opinion Comments 7/15/2019 Sheila Quinn Resident Neutral The PNF notes that it is anticipated to have enough sewer capacity in the existing 10" sewer main in Commonwealth Avenue. The project is estimated to generate 49,940 GPD of wasterwater. Per the NEIWPCC TP-16 a peak flow factor of 5.6 should be used to evaluate peak sewer flows. This indicates the peak flow from the project would be 0.43 cfs. The sewer mains existing capacity is noted as 4.95 cfs. This means this one project would be using almost 10% of sewer mains capacity. Additionally studies should be required to determine if additional capacity is required in the street to handle this project. If pumps are required for a the buildings a domestic water it should be reviewed if the DEP will require permitting to the modification of public drinking water system. 7/10/2019 Justin Brown 350Mass Neutral Greetings — The Boston Climate Action plan is calling for carbon neutrality by 2050. All new Allston-Brighton construction, therefore, should be designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as much as possible. In Boston, buildings account for approximately 70% of emissions. The mayor is fully committed to phasing our construction that relies on natural gas or other fossil fuels for heating and cooling. It is my hope that you have plans for 1515 Commonwealth Ave. that includes the most ambitious net zero construction possible. Best, Justin Brown 7/9/2019 Carol Boggs Allston Brighton Oppose We need to start planning development with an eye to livability.
    [Show full text]
  • Extra-Governmental Censorship in the Advertising Age
    Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review Volume 12 Number 2 Article 5 3-1-1992 Extra-Governmental Censorship in the Advertising Age Steven C. Schechter Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Steven C. Schechter, Extra-Governmental Censorship in the Advertising Age, 12 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 367 (1992). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr/vol12/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EXTRA-GOVERNMENTAL CENSORSHIP IN THE ADVERTISING AGE Steven C. Schechter* I. INTRODUCTION "Throughout history, families and religious groups have recognized their influence over the lives of their members and have used this influ- ence to maintain unity and adherence to a given set of values."' Vocal activists have for generations waged wars against works of literature and 2 art that they have found offensive to their religious or moral beliefs. They have attempted to exert their influence over society as a whole and to impose their values over all others. These activists believed that they were providing an invaluable service to society. From the time of the colonization of the United States through the 1950's, moral activists had the weapon of choice on their side: the strong-arm censorship powers of the law and the courts.
    [Show full text]
  • History's Future
    Winter 2003 ture the multigenera- American and East Asian history, to tional change that name a few. Recent faculty publica- shapes the Los tions span topics from the history of Angeles immigrant household government in America to communities. Down the study of medieval women. the corridor, Philip “The momentum of the history Ethington documents department is being fueled by some the timeless transfor- outstanding new faculty members, a mation of Los Angeles’ growing list of external collaborations people, landscapes and and the smart use of technology,” architecture through says College Dean Joseph Aoun. streaming media and “We are positioned to do some great digital panoramic pho- things in the 21st century.” tos. Meanwhile, medievalist Lisa Tales of the West Bitel—a recent The College boasts a strong con- Guggenheim Fellow— figuration of late 19th- and early collaborates with 20th-century American historians, scholars in European and is a pre-eminent center for libraries in a quest to examining the American West. make archives that At the forefront is University detail women’s first Professor and California State religious communities Librarian Kevin Starr, whose book easily accessible via the series chronicling California history Internet. Another col- and the American dream has gained league, Steven Ross, worldwide popularity. partners with the USC Other historians, such as Sanchez Center for Scholarly and Lon Kurashige, study Latino and Technology to docu- Asian immigration patterns to better ment how film shaped understand how American society has ideas about class and organized and changed through time. power in the 20th cen- Indeed, the College’s prime urban tury.
    [Show full text]
  • Symphony Hall, Boston Huntington and Massachusetts Avenues
    SYMPHONY HALL, BOSTON HUNTINGTON AND MASSACHUSETTS AVENUES Branch Exchange Telephones, Ticket and Administration Offices, Back Bay 149 1 lostoai Symphony QreSnesfe©J INC SERGE KOUSSEVITZKY, Conductor FORTY-FOURTH SEASON, 1924-1925 PiroErainriime WITH HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE NOTES BY PHILIP HALE COPYRIGHT, 1925, BY BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA, INC. THE OFFICERS AND TPJ 5TEES OF THE BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA, Inc. » FREDERICK P. CABOT . Pres.dent GALEN L. STONE ... Vice-President B. ERNEST DANE .... Treasurei FREDERICK P. CABOT ERNEST B. DANE HENRY B. SAWYER M. A. DE WOLFE HOWE GALEN L. STONE JOHN ELLERTON LODGE BENTLEY W, WARREN ARTHUR LYMAN E. SOHlER WELCH W. H. BRENNAN. Manager C E. JUDD Assistant Manager 1429 — THE INST%U<SMENT OF THE IMMORTALS IT IS true that Rachmaninov, Pader- Each embodies all the Steinway ewski, Hofmann—to name but a few principles and ideals. And each waits of a long list of eminent pianists only your touch upon the ivory keys have chosen the Steinway as the one to loose its matchless singing tone, perfect instrument. It is true that in to answer in glorious voice your the homes of literally thousands of quickening commands,, to echo in singers, directors and musicai celebri- lingering beauty or rushing splendor ties, the Steinway is an integral part the genius of the great composers. of the household. And it is equally true that the Steinway, superlatively fine as it is, comet well within the There is a Steinway dealer in your range of the inoderate income and community or near you through "whom meets all the lequirements of the you may purchase a new Steinway modest home.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Longing Is for Nothing Less Than the Reconciliation of Time and Place
    uman longing is for nothing less than the reconciliation of time and place, of past and future, of the many and the one, of the living and the dead. HBoston is precious because it lives in the national imagination, and increasingly the world’s, just so— as a still brilliant map of America’s good hope. —James Carroll from Mapping Boston Helping to Build The Good City The Boston Foundation works closely with its donors to make real, measurable change in some of the most important issues of our day. A number of key areas of community life benefited from the Foundation’s “Understanding Boston” model for social change in 2005: Research This year, the Foundation’s third biennial Boston Indicators Report identified the key competitive issues facing Boston and the region and offered an emerging civic agenda. The Foundation also released the third annual “Housing Report Card” and a report on ways for towns and cities to build affordable housing without increasing school costs. Other reports focused on goals for Boston Harbor and the Waterfront—and the impact and role of Greater Boston’s higher education institutions through the Carol R. Goldberg Seminar. Major Convenings All Boston Foundation reports are released at forums attracting thousands of people every year. In 2005 alone, the Foundation held some 20 forums on a diverse set of issues—including two major housing convenings, sessions focused on strengthening the nonprofit sector and community safety—and forums examining the effects of the tsunami and Hurricane Katrina on national and local philanthropy. Task Forces Task Forces of experts and stakeholders are convened and facilitated by the Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Concert Programs, Season 78, 1958-1959
    &M^ ,r\ v : '«. v 4 BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA FOUNDED IN 1881 BY HENRY LEE HIGGINSON M >titi A* jiiiititi rTTZT?/' — ^v ^ SEVENTY-EIGHTH SEASON 1958-1959 Sunday Afternoon Series BAYARD TUCKERMAN. JR. ARTHUR J. ANDERSON ROBERT T. FORREST JULIUS F. HALLER ARTHUR J. ANDERSON. JR HERBERT S. TUCKERMAN J. DEANE SOMERVILLE A Signal for a Safe Landing Lack of proper guidance may mean a difference between a safe or a crash landing. Lack of insur- ance coverage may mean the difference between solvency or bankruptcy. Insurance counsel from this Agency gives proper guidance to financial safety when losses occur. A signal from you and we are at your service! CHARLES H. WATKINS & CO. RICHARD P. NYQUIST in association with OBRION, RUSSELL & CO. Insurance of Every Description 108 Water Street Boston 6, Mass. LA fayette 3-5700 SEVENTY-EIGHTH SEASON, 1958-1959 Boston Symphony Orchestra CHARLES MUNCH, Music Director Richard Burgin, Associate Conductor CONCERT BULLETIN with historical and descriptive notes by John N. Burk The TRUSTEES of the BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA, Inc. Henry B. Cabot President Jacob J. Kaplan Vice-President Richard C. Paine Treasurer Talcott M. Banks Henry A. Laughlin Theodore P. Ferris John T. Noonan Francis W. Hatch Palfrey Perkins Harold D. Hodgkinson Charles H. Stockton C. D. Jackson Raymond S. Wilkins E. Morton Jennings, Jr. Oliver Wolcott TRUSTEES EMERITUS Philip R. Allen M. A. DeWolfe Howe N. Penrose Hallowell Lewis Perry Edward A. Taft Thomas D. Perry, Jr., Manager Norman S. Shirk James J. Brosnahan Assistant Manager Business Administrator Leonard Burkat Rosario Mazzeo Music Administrator Personnel Manager SYMPHONY HALL BOSTON 15 CAN YOU DESCRIBE A LIFE INSURANCE TRUST? If you are unaware of the many advantages of a Life Insurance Trust, it may be that a talk with a Shawmut Trust Officer would show you precisely how this type of protection would best suit your insurance needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk University Institutional Master Plan Notification Form
    SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY Institutional Master Plan Notification Form Submitted to Prepared by Boston Redevelopment Authority Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Boston, Massachusetts In association with Submitted by Chan Krieger Sieniewicz Suffolk University CBT/Childs Bertman Tseckares, Inc. Boston, Massachusetts Rubin & Rudman LLP Suffolk Construction January, 2008 SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION Background.............................................................................................................................1-1 The Urban Campus ................................................................................................................1-2 Institutional Master Planning Summary ..................................................................................1-3 2002 Suffolk University Institutional Master Plan....................................................1-3 2005 Amendment to Suffolk University Institutional Master Plan ...........................1-4 2007 Renewal of the Suffolk University Institutional Master Plan...........................1-5 2007 Amendment to Suffolk University Institutional Master Plan – 10 West Street Student Residence Hall Project .....................................................1-5 Public Process and Coordination............................................................................................1-6 Institutional Master Plan Team .............................................................................................1-10 2. MISSION AND OBJECTIVES Introduction.............................................................................................................................2-1
    [Show full text]
  • New Bostonians Demographic Report
    Mayor’s Office of New Bostonians Cheng Imm Tan, Director New Bostonians 2012 Research Division Alvaro Lima, Director 1 This report was prepared for the Mayor’s Office of New Bostonians by Mark Melnik and BRA Research Division staff, under the direction of Alvaro Lima, Director. Special thanks to Joshua Silverblatt for his invaluable role in creating this report. The information provided within this report is the best available at the time of its publication. City of Boston Thomas M. Menino, Mayor All or partial use of the data found within this report must be cited. Our preferred citation is as follows: Boston Redevelopment Boston Redevelopment Authority Authority/Research Peter Meade, Director Division, October 2012. Alvaro Lima, Director of Research 2 New Bostonians 2012 Table of Contents Demographics 4 Languages 15 Boston’s Neighborhood Diversity 22 Economic Contributions and Labor Force 31 English Proficiency 37 Educational Attainment 39 Homeownership 41 Citizenship 43 References 45 3 New Bostonians 2012 Demographics 4 39.3 Million Immigrants Live in the U.S. (2010) Immigrants account for more than 1 in 7 residents (12.8%), the highest percentage since 1930 (12%). 83.7% more immigrants live in the United States now than in 1990. Between 2000 and 2010, immigrants accounted for 50.3% of the nation’s population growth. In 2010, the nation’s largest immigrant groups were Latinos and Asians: 53% are from Latin America; 28% are from Asia; 12% are from Europe; 7% are from other regions in the world including Northern America and Oceania. 5 Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2008-2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Prohibition Enforcement : Its Effect on Courts and Prisons Association Against the Prohibition Amendment
    Bangor Public Library Bangor Community: Digital Commons@bpl Books and Publications Special Collections 1930 Prohibition Enforcement : Its Effect on Courts and Prisons Association Against the Prohibition Amendment Follow this and additional works at: https://digicom.bpl.lib.me.us/books_pubs Recommended Citation Association Against the Prohibition Amendment, "Prohibition Enforcement : Its Effect on Courts and Prisons" (1930). Books and Publications. 144. https://digicom.bpl.lib.me.us/books_pubs/144 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Collections at Bangor Community: Digital Commons@bpl. It has been accepted for inclusion in Books and Publications by an authorized administrator of Bangor Community: Digital Commons@bpl. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PROHIBITION OR CEMENT Its Effect on Courts and Prisons Prepared by the i\SSOCIATION AGAINST THE PROHIDITION AMENDMENT ' - ""71-~ NATIONAL PRESS BUILDING WASHINGTON, D. C . • ." , ,. o.-. .... "' •~'~ CI., ... ~ ') ~ ~a"'' ... .,~ ......· ., ~ .,<:).. ... ~ " .- ... ~ I) .. .. ~ .. .... .. l ... .. • 'J • ,. ")., .., ... ... ~ : :: ~ ~ ~~~>... ~ ; .~ ....... ; "'C' ji":•o• "'""~ ,_;..,. ~ r .:~., ~ ~~ :: ,. ~· :> ... ., i:l -' 111 .. .........~.. .. ., "' 0 :; ".., ! ~"'\ ... }"" ' '\ :}' ' ·~ " ........................ ,...... .. .. ~:~ .......' ... ~ : ~~; r~~ ...: :~: ~ "".., '' " ......... .., Research Department JOHN C. GEBHART, Director Publlahed December, 1930 Association Against the ~rohibition Amendment f) EXECU'TIVE COMMI'T'TEE
    [Show full text]
  • An Improbable Venture
    AN IMPROBABLE VENTURE A HISTORY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO NANCY SCOTT ANDERSON THE UCSD PRESS LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA © 1993 by The Regents of the University of California and Nancy Scott Anderson All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Anderson, Nancy Scott. An improbable venture: a history of the University of California, San Diego/ Nancy Scott Anderson 302 p. (not including index) Includes bibliographical references (p. 263-302) and index 1. University of California, San Diego—History. 2. Universities and colleges—California—San Diego. I. University of California, San Diego LD781.S2A65 1993 93-61345 Text typeset in 10/14 pt. Goudy by Prepress Services, University of California, San Diego. Printed and bound by Graphics and Reproduction Services, University of California, San Diego. Cover designed by the Publications Office of University Communications, University of California, San Diego. CONTENTS Foreword.................................................................................................................i Preface.........................................................................................................................v Introduction: The Model and Its Mechanism ............................................................... 1 Chapter One: Ocean Origins ...................................................................................... 15 Chapter Two: A Cathedral on a Bluff ......................................................................... 37 Chapter Three:
    [Show full text]
  • B Oston Inner Harbor
    93 30 Cambridge St Charlestown Msgr. O’Brien Chelsea St Hy Bridge Hampshire St Co Route 3 mm erc ial To Logan St t International 35 S t B s S Airport e 39 l r Broadway e o r v a t o h S n s Commercial Av C a d t Main St r H o on o f d M 31 i ar n Ch n a Longfellow a w ss t Ne a Cambridge St S ch Bridge u n I C se i C o n t h o d 22 t St a u St n s r State A r 16 w t St 7 A l t 29 e e o 33 S 34 l v a r r s B t n e n t v S o 38 i c H i t Harvard Bridge R m S e a s r n 4 2 e Boston T to r rl g 20 b Memorial Drive a Common in 44 o h Berkeley St sh 3 24 r C a 9 36 14 19 N W l o Public 8 10 41 e rth Beacon St er Garden 26 Beach S 37 n n Clarendon St t n A a v Dartmouth17 St 23Arlington St 42 C 25 43 S 15 21 h o 1 6 tuart S n 5 t r C gr 18 e e Commonwealth Av t t Su ss Commonwealth Av s n m S 46 e i m t 45 h e 40 c o r Boylston St r P 28 o Beacon St 90 t 27 D r 11 o Sobin 12 F Park 32 0 1/4 1/2 mi E Berkeley St 93 Boylston St 13 D St Huntington Av Brookline Av Reserved Channel Columbus Av Tremont St Representative Boston Office Landlord Projects 1 10 St.
    [Show full text]