DOCSLIB.ORG

Lewis F .. Powell, Jr. Here 1S a Draft Memorandum on the Death Eases. I Would Like to Turn This Over to You to Put in Appropriat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lewis F .. Powell, Jr. Here 1S a Draft Memorandum on the Death Eases. I Would Like to Turn This Over to You to Put in Appropriat MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Larry A. Hammond DATE: February 8, 1972 FROM: Lewis F .. Powell, Jr. Death Penalty Cases Here 1s a draft memorandum on the death eases. I would like to turn this over to you to put in appropriate form for some circulation. As you work on this, I would appreciate your keeping In mind the following: 1. As you will observe, there is a threshold question as to what I am writing: is it a possible opinlon for others to consider joining, an opinion expressing my own views concurring in m oplnion of someone else, or is it merely - at this time - a memorandum? As I do not know how the Court wlli finally line up, I am assuming that my view wW be in the minority. I suppose the best posture for the present is to write this as a "memorandum", which could be converted to an oplnion to be joined by others or filed as representing my own views. 2. A second question which needs to be resolved is whether I am writing primarily with respect to Aikens or addressing all four eases together 1n a sweeping opinion.. I would prefer - and have so - \ ~ 7 .... 1-.. ' .. 2. undertaken - to write the Aikens type optnlon. The issue can be stated moat sharply this way. A brief sapplemental oplnloo could be written, addreaed to eaeh of the other cases. While I can ecmeeive of rape cues tn which the death sentence would, to me, be cruel and 1Dlusual pmlsbment, I am not prepared as a judge to say that it is never permissible. 3. You w1ll note that my memoraDdum is not internally eon .. 8l8tent Jn its approach. In some places I ban spoken of the majority posJtion of the Court (wlrlch is an assumption that I will be 1n the minority, a« yet ver1fted). In most of the memoraadum I have met the arguments of. Petltlaner AJkenL Perbape the next draft should be conststent ln this respect. I would welcome your advice as to the best approach. 4. I have not read either Justice Marshall'• or Justice Douglas' aubmlsslon. I thoaght 1t beat to put down my own thoagbts without attempting to meet these optntona. Perhaps, as yoa rework my memorandum, you. will be able to Incorporate such addltloaal points or arguments as may be necessary to meet the views - where they differ from mine - of these Justtees (of. course, I wW read their dra1ts carefully In due time). ,, 3. 5. I am sure that you can buttress - by revision or expansion of the text or by additional footnotes and citations - the arguments I have made. While I do not want to write an encyclopedia (and there­ fore do not wish to labor the op1nlc:m, or even the footnotes with all possible arguments and citations), I would like to address fairly the principal issues. Also, any product of our chambers should be scholarly. 6. I am sure there are many omissions of important matter. One which comes to mind - as I dictate this is that I failed to emphasize, and to cite, the numerous State Supreme Court decisions and Federal Circuit Court cases which have affirmed the validity of the death sentence. I believe Prof. Wright stated that there were eight such decisions "last year". 7. I would appreciate your speclal consideration of my language­ choice .of words and mode of expression - with respect to what a majority of this Court may do. If they should ultimately vote in favor of total UJJConstltutionality, I will certainly want to ftle a strong dissent - not because I think capital punishment is desirable generally - but because it seems to me that such a decision is beyond the institutional role of the Court. I do want to be careful, however, with the language I use. I certainly do not want to offend other members of the Court. ,. 4. I suppose that other members of the Court .. perhaps all of them - are writing similar memoranda or q>inlons. There is some merit, I suppose, in getting ours out fairly early. L. F. P., Jr. 88 ..... ; ~z onstitutionally valid in any case under any circumstances and regard- 11' ~ess of the enormity of the crime. No appellate court, state or federal, 0 has heretofore reached such a conclusion. Not only is this the first appellate decision of constitutional invalidity of the death sentence; it reverses the Court's assumption of validity reiterated as recently as McGautha v. California, 402 U.S. 183, 197-203 (May 3, 1971) and consistently adhered to for nearly a century. This departure from long established precedents is shattering in terms of its effect on federal and state legislation heretofore deemed to be valid. No less than twelve provisions of the Criminal Code of the United States* and ten sections of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, approved by the Congress, will be voided. ** In addition, capital punishment laws of the District of Columbia and 41 states will be nullified. The striking down of this vast body of federal and *The Sections of the United States Code are set forth in Appendix lg of Petitioner's brief. (Cite references to Code). **Ibid. (Cite references to Code). 2. state legislation by a single decision of this Court is startling enough. But the greatest impact of this decision - by a majority of this Court - will be upon the doctrine of separation of powers. The decision denies to the Congress and to the legislatures of the 50 states the power - heretofore deemed a legislative power in this country and in • other democratic xxxmti1oas: countries -to impose capital punishment selectively even for the most heinous crime. Indeed, it denies to the people of each of the states the right, by duly adopted constitutional provision~ to make judgments on this policy question contrary to that of this Court. I can recall no subordination of legislative and electoral power on such a scale in any other democratic society. I. It is said by the majority that the Constitution requires this result, although it has not been so construed in the 181 years since the adoption of the Bill of Rights. The relevant provisions include the Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. The first of these provides in part: "No person shan be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous offense, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury .••; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; . nor be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law; . " 3. The Eighth Amendment, adopted the same day as the Fifth, proscribes "cruel and unusual punishments". The Fourteenth Amendment, adopted in 1868 -. some 77 years later - repeats, as a limitation on state action, the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment. Much has been written, in opinions of the Court and elsewhere, about the history of the Eighth Amendment. This need not be repeated here. * It is asserted, apparently with justification, that the founding fathers misapprehended the purpose and meaning of the "cruel and unusual punishment" provision of the English Declaration of Rights. Whether this be true or not)seems of no consequence. There cannot be the slightest doubt that the framers of the Constitution and Bill of Rights intended to authorize the death sentence, a penalty then widely imposed in England, the American colonies and in other countries. It is true that the phrase "cruel and unusual punishments" is not susceptible of precise definition. ** But there was no possible *For informative discussions of this history see Weems v. U.S., 217 U.S. 349 (1910) and especially the dissenting opinion of Justices White and Holmes (Ibid. p. ); Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962); McGautha v. California, 402 U.S. 183 (1972); O'Neil v. Vermont, 144 U.S. 323 (1892) and especially Mr. Justice Field's dissent at p. 340, et seq. See also Granucci, "Nor Cruel and Unusual Punishments"; The Original Meaning, 57 Cat L. Rev. 839 (196_ ). **This Court has so stated a number of times (cite cases). 4. ambiguity as to capital punishment. The Fifth Amendment, no less than three times, recognized that the taking of life by the state was a valid punishment when imposed pursuant to due process of law. II. It is asserted that whether the death sentence is a cruel and unusual punishment forbidden by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. is an "open' question, "uncontrolled by any prior decision of this Court. "* It is further said that "while this Court has several times assumed" the constitutionality of the death sentence, "it has never focused squarely upon that issue. " Let us test the soundness of this position by a review of what this Court has actually decided and said. It may be noted at the outset that a "raure holding" of constitutionality would have been redundant. A Courts normally do not hold something to be "constitutional" which is plainly authorized by the Constitution. The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments are as clear with respect to the death sentence as if their language had been: "The death sentence may be imposed pursuant to due process of law. " *Petitioner's Brief in Aikens, p. 7. 5. The Court on numerous occasions has both assumed and asserted the constitutionality of the death sentence. fu several cases this assumption was necessary to the decision, as the issue was whether a particular death sentence would be allowed to stand. One would have thought it impermissible, both as a matter of logic and authority, to argue that the question raised in this case is "an open one," not fore- closed by prior decisions of this Court.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Variations in Forms of Sexual Violence
    variations in forms of sexual violence a comparative analysis of bosnia and rwanda my rafstedt, university of york (2014) ABSTRACT Sexual violence during the Bosnian War (1992-1995) and the Rwandan genocide (1994) has been analyzed thoroughly, but limited attention has been paid to how sexual violence difered in these two conficts and why. Tis will be investigated by doing a comparative analysis. Kirby’s modes of feminist analysis will be used as framework, and attention will be paid to the relationship between the construction of ethnic and gender identities and particular forms of sexual violence. It will be demonstrated that forced impregnation characterized Bosnian sexual violence, whilst mutilation of female body parts and mur- der afer rape were prominent in Rwanda. I argue that this can be explained by looking at how these forms of sexual violence were the result of mythology and shared beliefs and were being used by ethnic leaders to re-construct ethnic and gender identities to serve their own political objectives. Because these myths, identity constructions and leader ob- jectives were diferent in Bosnia and Rwanda, the forms of sexual violence were as well. INTRODUCTION 1995) and the Rwandan genocide (1994). Tese two exual violence in conficts has gone from being cases followed a similar pattern of leaders of ethnic considered an unchallenged by-product of war groups targeting women’s bodies, and as a result, the to being thoroughly scrutinized from a range of women experienced very high rates of sexual vio- Sperspectives. Te war in Bosnia-Herzegovina (hence- lence.4 Tey were both ethnic conficts in which sexu- forth referred to as Bosnia) from 1992 to 1995 was al violence was deployed as a strategy of war.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Justice: Capital Punishment Focus
    Criminal Justice: Capital Punishment Focus Background The formal execution of criminals has been used in nearly all societies since the beginning of recorded history. Before the beginning of humane capital punishment used in today’s society, penalties included boiling to death, flaying, slow slicing, crucifixion, impalement, crushing, disembowelment, stoning, burning, decapitation, dismemberment and scaphism. In earlier times, the death penalty was used for a variety of reasons that today would seem barbaric. Today, execution in the US is used primarily for murder, espionage and treason. The Death Debate Those in support of capital punishment believe it deters crimes and, more often than not believe that certain crimes eliminate one’s right to life. Those who oppose capital punishment believe, first and foremost, that any person, including the government, has no right to take a life for any reason. They often believe that living with one’s crimes is a worse punishment than dying for them, and that the threat of capital punishment will not deter a person from committing a crime. Costs and Procedures On average, it costs $620,932 per trial in federal death cases, which is 8x higher than that of a case where the death penalty is not sought. When including appeals, incarceration times and the execution in a death penalty case, the cost is closer to $3 million per inmate. However, court costs, attorney fees and incarceration for life only totals a little over $1 million. Recent studies have also found that the higher the cost of legal counsel in a death penalty case the less likely the defendant is to receive the death penalty, which calls the fairness of the process into question.
    [Show full text]
  • Attitudes Toward Execution: the Tragic and Grotesque Framing of Capital Punishment in the News
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2016 Attitudes Toward Execution: The Tragic and Grotesque Framing of Capital Punishment in the News Katherine Shuy Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Rhetoric Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Shuy, Katherine, "Attitudes Toward Execution: The Tragic and Grotesque Framing of Capital Punishment in the News" (2016). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 10666. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/10666 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Running Head: ATTITUDES TOWARD EXECUTION i ATTITUDES TOWARD EXECUTION: THE TRAGIC AND GROTESQUE FRAMING OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN THE NEWS By KATHERINE SARAH SHUY Bachelor of Arts, University of Puget Sound, Tacoma, Washington, 2010 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Communication Studies The University of Montana Missoula, MT May 2016 Approved by: Scott Whittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Sara Hayden, Co-Chair Communication Studies Steve Schwarze, Co-Chair Communication Studies Lee Banville Journalism ATTITUDES TOWARD EXECUTION ii Shuy, Katherine, M.A., Spring 2016 Communication Studies The Tragic and Grotesque Framing of Capital Punishment in the News Co-Chairperson: Sara Hayden Co-Chairperson: Steve Schwarze This essay undertakes a detailed frame analysis of print and electronic media coverage of three nationally publicized death penalty cases between the years of 2014 and 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sailor Who Fell from Grace with the Sea
    Penguin Books The Sailor Who Fell from Grace with the Sea Yukio Mishima was born in Tokyo in 1925. When he graduated from the Peers' School in 1944, he received a citation from the Emperor as the highest honour student. He graduated from the Tokyo Imperial University School of Jurisprudence in 1947, and the following year he published his first novel. He wrote eight novels, four successful plays for the Kabuki Theatre, and a travel book. He was the author of more than fifty short stories, ten one-act plays, and several volumes of essays. Among his books published in England are After the Banquet, Confessions elf a Mask, Death in Midsummer and other stories, and The Thirstfor Love. The Sound of Waves, published in Japan under the title of Shiosai, won the 1954 Shinchosha literary prize. Immediately after the Second World War, Yukio Mishima went to the United States as a guest of the State Department and of Partisan Review. In his spare time he was a devotee of weight-lifting and body-building exercises. Mishima firmly upheld the traditions of Japan's imperial past, which he believed were being swiftly eroded by Western materialism. In 1970 he astonished the world when he and a colleague committed ritual suicide, or hara-kiri, by disembowelment. Yukio Mishima The Sailor Who Fell from Grace with the Sea Translated from the Japanese by John Nathan Penguin Books in association with Martin Seeker & Warburg Penguin Books Ltd, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England Penguin Books, 625 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Death Penalty Laws
    #1 Free Legal Website FindLaw.com is the leading and largest online resource for legal information. For basic legal issues to more complex ones, you’ll find thousands of helpful articles, a legal community to get answers to your specific questions, an attorney directory, blogs, news, DIY forms, and much more. Histor y of Death Penalty Laws The first recognized death penalty laws date backtoeighteenth centuryB.C.and can be found in the Code of King Ham- maurabi of Babylon. The Hammurabi Code prescribed the death penalty for overtwenty different offenses.The death penalty was also partofthe Hittite Code in the four teenth centur y B.C. The Draconian Code of Athens,insev enth century B.C.,made death the lone punishment for all crimes.Inthe fifth centuryB.C., the Roman Lawofthe TwelveTablets also contained the death penalty.Death sentences were carried out bysuch means as beheading, boiling in oil, bur ying alive, burning, crucifixion, disembowelment, drowning, flaying alive, hanging, impalement, stoning, strangling, being thrown to wild animals,and quarter ing (being tornapar t). In Britain, hanging became the usual method of execution in the tenth centuryA.D.Inthe eleventh century, William the Conqueror would not allowpersons to be hanged or otherwise executed for anycrime,except in times of war.How ever, this trend did not last long. As manyas72,000 people were executed in the sixteenth centurydur ing the reign of Henry VIII. Common execution methods used during this time included boiling, bur ning at the stake, hanging, beheading, and drawing and quarter ing. Various capital offenses included marrying a Jew, not confessing to a crime,and treason.
    [Show full text]
  • 1997 Annual Report of CPSC Actions and Activities
    Dear Members of Congress: The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is pleased to submit its report for fiscal year 1997. As an independent federal agency, CPSC helps to keep families—especially children—safe in their homes, schools, in recreation and other places by overseeing the safety of 15,000 types of consumer products. To reduce injuries and deaths associated with these products, CPSC identifies and analyzes product hazards, helps industry to develop voluntary standards for products, monitors compliance with voluntary standards, issues and enforces mandatory standards, obtains recalls of dangerous products from the marketplace, and informs the public of potential product risks. This year, CPSC worked with industry to obtain several large recalls of hazardous products that were quickly brought to the public’s attention. These recalls included over 40 million halogen torchiere floor lamps, more than one million playpens, and nearly one million baby monitors. In addition, as part of the process to develop a mandatory standard for bicycle helmets, CPSC completed analysis on the issue of special provisions for bicycle helmets for children under age five. The following pages explain in detail CPSC's work in fiscal year 1997, which helped reduce injuries and save lives. As Chairman, and with my esteemed colleagues Vice-Chairman Mary Sheila Gall and Commissioner Thomas Hill Moore, we will see that CPSC continues to share the responsibility of product safety with our product-safety partners, industry and the American public. Sincerely,
    [Show full text]
  • Kant and Capital Punishment Today
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UNL | Libraries University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications - Department of Philosophy Philosophy, Department of 2002 Kant and Capital Punishment Today Nelson T. Potter University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/philosfacpub Part of the Philosophy Commons Potter, Nelson T., "Kant and Capital Punishment Today" (2002). Faculty Publications - Department of Philosophy. 5. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/philosfacpub/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications - Department of Philosophy by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in The Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (2002), pp. 267–282. Copyright © 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Used by permission. Kant and Capital Punishment Today Nelson T. Potter, Jr. Department of Philosophy University of Nebraska–Lincoln Lincoln, NE 68588-0321, USA 1. Immanuel Kant was emphatically in favor of the death penalty for the crime of murder, as anyone who knows anything about Kant is likely to know. In sup- port of his view, he made the following statement, sometimes quoted as an exam- ple of extremism in support of capital punishment: Even if a civil society were to be dissolved by the
    [Show full text]
  • The Abolition of the Death Penalty in the United Kingdom
    The Abolition of the Death Penalty in the United Kingdom How it Happened and Why it Still Matters Julian B. Knowles QC Acknowledgements This monograph was made possible by grants awarded to The Death Penalty Project from the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, the United Kingdom Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the Sigrid Rausing Trust, the Oak Foundation, the Open Society Foundation, Simons Muirhead & Burton and the United Nations Voluntary Fund for Victims of Torture. Dedication The author would like to dedicate this monograph to Scott W. Braden, in respectful recognition of his life’s work on behalf of the condemned in the United States. © 2015 Julian B. Knowles QC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage retrieval system, without permission in writing from the author. Copies of this monograph may be obtained from: The Death Penalty Project 8/9 Frith Street Soho London W1D 3JB or via our website: www.deathpenaltyproject.org ISBN: 978-0-9576785-6-9 Cover image: Anti-death penalty demonstrators in the UK in 1959. MARY EVANS PICTURE LIBRARY 2 Contents Foreword .....................................................................................................................................................4 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................5 A brief
    [Show full text]
  • The Portrayal of Suicide in Postmodern Japanese Literature and Popular Culture Media
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM UVM Honors College Senior Theses Undergraduate Theses 2014 The orP trayal of Suicide in Postmodern Japanese Literature and Popular Culture Media Pedro M. Teixeira Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses Recommended Citation Teixeira, Pedro M., "The orP trayal of Suicide in Postmodern Japanese Literature and Popular Culture Media" (2014). UVM Honors College Senior Theses. 15. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses/15 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in UVM Honors College Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PORTRAYAL OF SUICIDE IN POSTMODERN JAPANESE LITERATURE AND POPULAR CULTURE MEDIA Pedro Manço Teixeira Honors Thesis Final Draft, Spring 2014 Thesis Advisor: Kyle Keoni Ikeda INTRODUCTION Within Japanese society, suicide has been a recurring cultural and social concern explored extensively in various literary and artistic forms, and has evolved into a serious societal epidemic by the end of the 20 th century. This project investigates contemporary Japan’s suicide epidemic through an analysis of the portrayal of suicide in post-1970s Japanese literature, films, and popular culture media of manga 1 and anime 2, and in comparison to empirical data on suicide in Japan as presented in peer-reviewed psychology articles. In the analysis of these contemporary works, particular attention was given to their targeted demographic, the profiles of the suicide victims in the stories, the justifications for suicide, and the relevance of suicide to the plot of each work.
    [Show full text]
  • Compensation Or Blood Feuds
    4/21/2011 Punishment has been a part of the history of mankind to the beginning of recorded history Punishments included: ◦ Corporal punishment ◦ Shunning ◦ Banishment ◦ Execution Communities would respond to other communities with a formal apology, compensation or blood feuds Compensation to other communities As societies developed so did systems of included: justice ◦ Cattle Most famous: The Code of Hammurabi (1700 ◦ Slaves BC) which is one of the first known written ◦ Offeringpg a person for execution – did not have to be law containing 282 laws the perpetrator Lex talionis – “eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth” Nearly all societies used some form of capital punishment 1 4/21/2011 Boiling to death Flaying Disembowelment Crucifixion IlImpalement Crushing (including by elephant) Stoning Burning Dismemberment 18th century Britain there were 222 crimes Philosophical views – as early as the Greeks punishable by death – including cutting down and Romans a tree or stealing an animal. Begin in the 1700’s Public hanging of pickpockets created the First question – why am I taking your time to opportunity for more pickpocketing examine the state of affairs so many years ago? I have shown you in too much detail the history Imposing a sentence is one of the most of torture. The person who is credited with the banishment difficult tasks performed by trial judges. of torture is Cesare Beccaria and his treatise On In Canada we are governed by the principles in Crimes and Punishment the Criminal Code, of which much more will
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Capital Punishment: Recent Developments
    Legal Sidebari Federal Capital Punishment: Recent Developments Updated April 27, 2020 Update 4/27/2020: On April 7, 2020, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (D.C. Circuit) vacated the district court’s preliminary order barring the federal inmates’ executions from going forward. Two judges on the three-judge panel agreed that the district court misconstrued the Federal Death Penalty Act (FDPA), though the judges disagreed on the precise scope of the FDPA’s requirement that federal executions be implemented in the “manner” prescribed by the state of conviction. In light of the panel ruling, the federal inmates have sought rehearing by the full D.C. Circuit. Eventual Supreme Court review is a possibility as well, and some claims would remain to be addressed by the district court on remand from the D.C. Circuit regardless. Update 11/22/2019: After this Sidebar was published, two more of the federal inmates scheduled for execution joined the litigation challenging the 2019 execution protocol and filed motions seeking preliminary orders barring their executions from going forward. On November 20, 2019, the district court granted the motions, concluding that the 2019 execution protocol’s “uniform procedure approach very likely exceeds the authority provided by” Congress because the Federal Death Penalty Act specifies that federal executions must be implemented in the manner prescribed by the state of conviction. As a result of the court’s order, it appears that the executions of the four inmates who filed motions will not take place as scheduled, though the order only relates to requests for preliminary relief and the Department of Justice has filed a notice of appeal.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Capital Punishment Is No Punishment at All
    American University Law Review Volume 64 Issue 6 Article 2 2015 Why Capital Punishment is No Punishment At All Jason Iuliano Villanova University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aulr Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation Iuliano, Jason (2015) "Why Capital Punishment is No Punishment At All," American University Law Review: Vol. 64 : Iss. 6 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aulr/vol64/iss6/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Why Capital Punishment is No Punishment At All Abstract Capital punishment has generated an incredible amount of public debate. Is the practice constitutional? Does it deter crime? Is it humane? Supporters and opponents of capital punishment disagree on all of these issues and many more. There is perhaps only one thing that unites these two camps: the belief that the death penalty is society's most severe punishment. In this Article, I argue that this belief is mistaken. Capital punishment is not at the top of the punishment hierarchy. In fact, it is no punishment at all. My argument builds from a basic conception of punishment endorsed by the Supreme Court: for something to qualify as a punishment, it must be bad, in some way, for the person who is punished.
    [Show full text]