DOCSLIB.ORG

Morality in Law: Capital Punishment and the Mentally Retarded a Thesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Morality in Law: Capital Punishment and the Mentally Retarded a Thesis Morality in Law: Capital Punishment and the Mentally Retarded A thesis submitted to the Miami University Honors Program, the Department of Philosophy, and the American Studies Program in partial fulfillment of the requirements for University Honors and Departmental Honors, respectively. by Daniel J. Burke May, 2003 Oxford, Ohio ABSTRACT Morality in Law: Capital Punishment and the Mentally Retarded By Daniel J. Burke The debate over capital punishment is a fierce and persistent one. Moral, practical, and legal arguments are weighed, often with conflicting conclusions. This thesis will examine one subsection of the debate in order to determine the significance of moral theories in legal rulings. A review of the moral arguments and the legal history will precede a final comparison of the two. The first two chapters will show that the execution of persons with mental retardation is both morally and legally unacceptable. The final comparison suggests that, although moral arguments may not have a given role in the courtroom, the inclusion of such arguments rescues the system from amorality and serves a valuable, if dangerous, purpose in legislative review and evolution. ii iii Morality in Law: Capital Punishment and the Mentally Retarded By Daniel J. Burke Approved by: Dr. Richard Momeyer, Advisor Dr. Rama Rao Pappu, Reader Dr. Daniel Herron, Reader Accepted by: Dr. Carolyn Haynes, Director, University Honors Program iv v Acknowledgments The completion of this thesis is the result of the guidance and encouragement of others as much as it is my own effort. I thank my advisor Richard Momeyer for his patience and for his diligent attention to my work. The final product surprises me and it is no doubt due to his input and assistance that this surprise has been a pleasant one. I next wish to thank my readers, Rama Rao Pappu and Dan Herron, for their contribution. They blindly sacrificed their time and I only hope that, after reading my work, they do not regret it. I also thank Peggy Shaffer and Terry Perlin for reviewing early (and ugly) drafts and offering their suggestions. I thank my family for listening to frustrations and cheering successes along the way. Finally, I thank my housemates for forcing me to reach unprecedented levels of concentration and for their open invitation to procrastinate; I am certain this thesis is better thanks to all of the above. vi Contents Introduction 1 Chapter One: The Moral Arguments 4 Chapter Two: The Legal History 15 Chapter Three: Relations between Law and Morality 36 Epilogue 50 Bibliography 52 vii Introduction1 On the night of August 16th, 1996, Daryl Renard Atkins and his friend, William Jones, entered a convenience store in York County, Virginia. Atkins carried a firearm with him but concealed it while at the store. After drinking and smoking marijuana that afternoon, the two men were seeking more beer but had no money. Atkins approached several other customers asking for money, including Eric Nesbitt. Nesbitt was a 21-year- old Air Force pilot from nearby Langley Air Force Base. Atkins and Jones followed Nesbitt out of the store, forcibly entered his truck, and robbed him. The money Nesbitt had with him was apparently insufficient, as Atkins demanded that he drive to the ATM to withdraw more. Cameras at the ATM recorded the visit. The three men then proceeded to a remote location where Nesbitt was shot eight times, fatally. Atkins had a long list of felony convictions on his record. Some of these were recounted during the Nesbitt murder trial. “Robbery, attempted robbery, abduction, use of a firearm, and maiming,” Atkins’ record was anything but clean. Previous victims testified about Atkins’ violent and abusive behavior. His co-conspirator, William Jones, testified that it was Atkins who committed the final act of murder. Atkins also had a long history of mental impairment. He had failed the second and tenth grades in school and achieved a 1.26 grade point average (out of a possible 4.0) before dropping out of high school. Atkins’ overall IQ was found to be 59, well below the generally accepted cutoff for mental retardation (70-75). The early presentation of Atkins’ impairment in conjunction with his substantial intellectual impairment and his 1 Facts about the crime and the trial, although they can be found in many sources, have been taken from the following: Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 20 June, 2002.; “Daryl Renard Atkins – Mental Retardation,” The International Justice Project, http://www.internationaljusticeproject.org/retardationDatkins.cfm, (20 March 2003). Burke 2 “limited capacity for adaptive behavior” qualified him as “mildly mentally retarded.”2 Despite this finding, the jury convicted Atkins of capital murder and sentenced him to death. Atkins appealed the sentence and on June 20th, 2002, the United States Supreme Court issued their official opinion in the case of Daryl Renard Atkins v. Virginia. Their ruling upheld Atkins’ conviction but overturned his death sentence on the grounds that execution of the mentally retarded violated the Eighth Amendment prohibition against “cruel and unusual punishment.” Such a ruling is especially significant because it effectively prohibits any such execution in the future. Atkins established a substantial limitation to the practice of capital punishment and marked a major victory for opponents of the death penalty. This thesis will examine the Atkins ruling for its importance as a legal and moral decision. Moral theorists have long debated the moral legitimacy of capital punishment and the law has struggled to respond to this debate. The present examination will require an understanding of 1) the moral arguments concerning this debate and 2) the legal background of the ruling. The initial result will be an understanding of the Atkins case itself. However, this paper has a deeper goal. Examining the ruling carefully for moral and legal arguments will reveal that law and morality are not completely separate. The nature of their interaction is complex and controversial, but the following chapters will show one of the ways that law and morality interact. Furthermore, I will argue that it may be fortunate that the two fields mingle. The specific issue of executing persons with mental retardation will allow us to examine the broader issues of morality in law and the 2 The International Justice Project, http://www.internationaljusticeproject.org/retardationDatkins.cfm. 2 Burke 3 role of the judiciary in negotiating this relationship. Conclusions on the morality of executing persons with mental retardation, the legality of executing persons with mental retardation and the place for morality in law are explained in the final chapter. These conclusions have been reached in the course of considering the question: What influence do moral theories have on the decisions of the courts? 3 Chapter One: The Moral Arguments The moral arguments for capital punishment can be divided into two general categories: forward looking (consequentialist) and backward looking (retributivist). This distinguishes the approaches based on the considerations they deem relevant to morality. As the name suggests, the consequentialist approach is concerned with the consequences of an action when evaluating its moral permissibility. The moral theory of utilitarianism, a consequentialist theory, is a key element of the death penalty debate. Jeremy Bentham, a principal founder of utilitarianism, wrote “By the principle of utility is meant that principle which approves or disapproves of every action whatsoever, according to the tendency which it appears to augment or to diminish the happiness of the party whose interest is in question.”3 Referred to by John Stuart Mill (the other principal founder of utilitarianism) as the Greatest Happiness Principle,4 utilitarianism weighs the pros and cons for every action to determine the moral value of that action. Therefore, when considering punishment, a wide range of consequences should be considered. In limiting these considerations, a further distinction can be made between ‘act’ and ‘rule’ utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism examines the consequences of each act, determining moral acceptability on a case-by-case basis. Rule utilitarianism considers the consequences of general codes of conduct and then operates according to these codes. Although act utilitarianism is useful for evaluating particular court cases, rule utilitarianism will be more appropriate when evaluating broad practices, such as executing persons with mental retardation. Landmark court cases, of the kind that will be 3 Jeremy Bentham, “From An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation,” in Utilitarianism and Other Essays, ed. Alan Ryan (New York: Penguin Books, 1987), 65. 4 J. S. Mill, “Utilitarianism,” in Utilitarianism and Other Essays, ed. Alan Ryan (New York: Penguin Books, 1987), 278. Burke 5 noted in Chapter II, alter and/or establish rules in the form of legal precedent. Of course the individual who is directly affected by the ruling matters, but the broader effects are my concern here. Because of its flexibility, the utilitarian justification for punishment is nearly impossible to state concisely. We might consider only direct and immediate consequences or we might deem indirect, long-term effects relevant. This leads to uncertainty about whether the utilitarian does or does not approve of capital punishment. The lack of definitive evidence of many of the consequences being considered further complicates the debate. The most common utilitarian justifications for punishment can be broken down into three major groups: deterrence, reform, and prevention.5 These are also three primary penological goals, since the utilitarian is gauging morality by practical considerations. Punishing the criminal can deter potential criminals, reform the convicted criminal, and prevent the convicted criminal from repeating his/her offense. Deterrence has long been the most debated penological goal. Proponents argue for the logical existence of deterrence. Punishing a criminal for committing a crime sends a message to potential criminals that they too will be punished.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Variations in Forms of Sexual Violence
    variations in forms of sexual violence a comparative analysis of bosnia and rwanda my rafstedt, university of york (2014) ABSTRACT Sexual violence during the Bosnian War (1992-1995) and the Rwandan genocide (1994) has been analyzed thoroughly, but limited attention has been paid to how sexual violence difered in these two conficts and why. Tis will be investigated by doing a comparative analysis. Kirby’s modes of feminist analysis will be used as framework, and attention will be paid to the relationship between the construction of ethnic and gender identities and particular forms of sexual violence. It will be demonstrated that forced impregnation characterized Bosnian sexual violence, whilst mutilation of female body parts and mur- der afer rape were prominent in Rwanda. I argue that this can be explained by looking at how these forms of sexual violence were the result of mythology and shared beliefs and were being used by ethnic leaders to re-construct ethnic and gender identities to serve their own political objectives. Because these myths, identity constructions and leader ob- jectives were diferent in Bosnia and Rwanda, the forms of sexual violence were as well. INTRODUCTION 1995) and the Rwandan genocide (1994). Tese two exual violence in conficts has gone from being cases followed a similar pattern of leaders of ethnic considered an unchallenged by-product of war groups targeting women’s bodies, and as a result, the to being thoroughly scrutinized from a range of women experienced very high rates of sexual vio- Sperspectives. Te war in Bosnia-Herzegovina (hence- lence.4 Tey were both ethnic conficts in which sexu- forth referred to as Bosnia) from 1992 to 1995 was al violence was deployed as a strategy of war.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Punishment in Illinois in the Aftermath of the Ryan Commutations
    Northwestern University School of Law Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons Faculty Working Papers 2010 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN ILLINOIS IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE RYAN COMMUTATIONS: REFORMS, ECONOMIC REALITIES, AND A NEW SALIENCY FOR ISSUES OF COST Leigh Buchanan Bienen Northwestern University School of Law, [email protected] Repository Citation Bienen, Leigh Buchanan, "CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN ILLINOIS IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE RYAN COMMUTATIONS: REFORMS, ECONOMIC REALITIES, AND A NEW SALIENCY FOR ISSUES OF COST" (2010). Faculty Working Papers. Paper 118. http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/facultyworkingpapers/118 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Working Papers by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/10/10004-0001 THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 100, No. 4 Copyright © 2010 by Northwestern University, School of Law Printed in U.S.A. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN ILLINOIS IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE RYAN COMMUTATIONS: REFORMS, ECONOMIC REALITIES, AND A NEW SALIENCY FOR ISSUES OF COST LEIGH B. BIENEN Perhaps most telling is the view of Professor Joseph Hoffman, someone who has devoted enormous time and energy to death penalty reform, spearheading death penalty reform efforts in both Illinois and Indiana and serving as Co-Chair and Reporter for the Massachusetts Governor‘s Council on Capital Punishment. Hoffman served as a member of an advisory group to discuss an earlier draft of this paper, and he strongly expressed the view that seeking reform of capital punishment in the political realm is futile.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Justice: Capital Punishment Focus
    Criminal Justice: Capital Punishment Focus Background The formal execution of criminals has been used in nearly all societies since the beginning of recorded history. Before the beginning of humane capital punishment used in today’s society, penalties included boiling to death, flaying, slow slicing, crucifixion, impalement, crushing, disembowelment, stoning, burning, decapitation, dismemberment and scaphism. In earlier times, the death penalty was used for a variety of reasons that today would seem barbaric. Today, execution in the US is used primarily for murder, espionage and treason. The Death Debate Those in support of capital punishment believe it deters crimes and, more often than not believe that certain crimes eliminate one’s right to life. Those who oppose capital punishment believe, first and foremost, that any person, including the government, has no right to take a life for any reason. They often believe that living with one’s crimes is a worse punishment than dying for them, and that the threat of capital punishment will not deter a person from committing a crime. Costs and Procedures On average, it costs $620,932 per trial in federal death cases, which is 8x higher than that of a case where the death penalty is not sought. When including appeals, incarceration times and the execution in a death penalty case, the cost is closer to $3 million per inmate. However, court costs, attorney fees and incarceration for life only totals a little over $1 million. Recent studies have also found that the higher the cost of legal counsel in a death penalty case the less likely the defendant is to receive the death penalty, which calls the fairness of the process into question.
    [Show full text]
  • Staging Executions: the Theater of Punishment in Early Modern England Sarah N
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2007 Staging Executions: The Theater of Punishment in Early Modern England Sarah N. Redmond Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY THE COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES “STAGING EXECUTIONS: THE THEATER OF PUNISHMENT IN EARLY MODERN ENGLAND” By SARAH N. REDMOND This thesis submitted to the Department of English in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2007 The members of the Committee approve the thesis of Sarah N. Redmond, Defended on the 2nd of April, 2007 _______________________ Daniel Vitkus Professor Directing Thesis _______________________ Gary Taylor Committee Member _______________________ Celia Daileader Committee Member Approved: _______________________ Nancy Warren Director of Graduate Studies The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my major professor, Dr. Daniel Vitkus, for his wonderful and invaluable ideas concerning this project, and Dr. Gary Taylor and Dr. Celia Daileader for serving on my thesis committee. I would also like to thank Drs. Daileader and Vitkus for their courses in the Fall 2006, which inspired elements of this thesis. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures . v Abstract . vi INTRODUCTION: Executions in Early Modern England: Practices, Conventions, Experiences, and Interpretations . .1 CHAPTER ONE: “Blood is an Incessant Crier”: Sensationalist Accounts of Crime and Punishment in Early Modern Print Culture . .11 CHAPTER TWO “Violence Prevails”: Death on the Stage in Kyd’s The Spanish Tragedy and Middleton’s The Revenger’s Tragedy .
    [Show full text]
  • Attitudes Toward Execution: the Tragic and Grotesque Framing of Capital Punishment in the News
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2016 Attitudes Toward Execution: The Tragic and Grotesque Framing of Capital Punishment in the News Katherine Shuy Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Rhetoric Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Shuy, Katherine, "Attitudes Toward Execution: The Tragic and Grotesque Framing of Capital Punishment in the News" (2016). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 10666. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/10666 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Running Head: ATTITUDES TOWARD EXECUTION i ATTITUDES TOWARD EXECUTION: THE TRAGIC AND GROTESQUE FRAMING OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN THE NEWS By KATHERINE SARAH SHUY Bachelor of Arts, University of Puget Sound, Tacoma, Washington, 2010 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Communication Studies The University of Montana Missoula, MT May 2016 Approved by: Scott Whittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Sara Hayden, Co-Chair Communication Studies Steve Schwarze, Co-Chair Communication Studies Lee Banville Journalism ATTITUDES TOWARD EXECUTION ii Shuy, Katherine, M.A., Spring 2016 Communication Studies The Tragic and Grotesque Framing of Capital Punishment in the News Co-Chairperson: Sara Hayden Co-Chairperson: Steve Schwarze This essay undertakes a detailed frame analysis of print and electronic media coverage of three nationally publicized death penalty cases between the years of 2014 and 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sailor Who Fell from Grace with the Sea
    Penguin Books The Sailor Who Fell from Grace with the Sea Yukio Mishima was born in Tokyo in 1925. When he graduated from the Peers' School in 1944, he received a citation from the Emperor as the highest honour student. He graduated from the Tokyo Imperial University School of Jurisprudence in 1947, and the following year he published his first novel. He wrote eight novels, four successful plays for the Kabuki Theatre, and a travel book. He was the author of more than fifty short stories, ten one-act plays, and several volumes of essays. Among his books published in England are After the Banquet, Confessions elf a Mask, Death in Midsummer and other stories, and The Thirstfor Love. The Sound of Waves, published in Japan under the title of Shiosai, won the 1954 Shinchosha literary prize. Immediately after the Second World War, Yukio Mishima went to the United States as a guest of the State Department and of Partisan Review. In his spare time he was a devotee of weight-lifting and body-building exercises. Mishima firmly upheld the traditions of Japan's imperial past, which he believed were being swiftly eroded by Western materialism. In 1970 he astonished the world when he and a colleague committed ritual suicide, or hara-kiri, by disembowelment. Yukio Mishima The Sailor Who Fell from Grace with the Sea Translated from the Japanese by John Nathan Penguin Books in association with Martin Seeker & Warburg Penguin Books Ltd, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England Penguin Books, 625 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Death Penalty Laws
    #1 Free Legal Website FindLaw.com is the leading and largest online resource for legal information. For basic legal issues to more complex ones, you’ll find thousands of helpful articles, a legal community to get answers to your specific questions, an attorney directory, blogs, news, DIY forms, and much more. Histor y of Death Penalty Laws The first recognized death penalty laws date backtoeighteenth centuryB.C.and can be found in the Code of King Ham- maurabi of Babylon. The Hammurabi Code prescribed the death penalty for overtwenty different offenses.The death penalty was also partofthe Hittite Code in the four teenth centur y B.C. The Draconian Code of Athens,insev enth century B.C.,made death the lone punishment for all crimes.Inthe fifth centuryB.C., the Roman Lawofthe TwelveTablets also contained the death penalty.Death sentences were carried out bysuch means as beheading, boiling in oil, bur ying alive, burning, crucifixion, disembowelment, drowning, flaying alive, hanging, impalement, stoning, strangling, being thrown to wild animals,and quarter ing (being tornapar t). In Britain, hanging became the usual method of execution in the tenth centuryA.D.Inthe eleventh century, William the Conqueror would not allowpersons to be hanged or otherwise executed for anycrime,except in times of war.How ever, this trend did not last long. As manyas72,000 people were executed in the sixteenth centurydur ing the reign of Henry VIII. Common execution methods used during this time included boiling, bur ning at the stake, hanging, beheading, and drawing and quarter ing. Various capital offenses included marrying a Jew, not confessing to a crime,and treason.
    [Show full text]
  • 1997 Annual Report of CPSC Actions and Activities
    Dear Members of Congress: The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is pleased to submit its report for fiscal year 1997. As an independent federal agency, CPSC helps to keep families—especially children—safe in their homes, schools, in recreation and other places by overseeing the safety of 15,000 types of consumer products. To reduce injuries and deaths associated with these products, CPSC identifies and analyzes product hazards, helps industry to develop voluntary standards for products, monitors compliance with voluntary standards, issues and enforces mandatory standards, obtains recalls of dangerous products from the marketplace, and informs the public of potential product risks. This year, CPSC worked with industry to obtain several large recalls of hazardous products that were quickly brought to the public’s attention. These recalls included over 40 million halogen torchiere floor lamps, more than one million playpens, and nearly one million baby monitors. In addition, as part of the process to develop a mandatory standard for bicycle helmets, CPSC completed analysis on the issue of special provisions for bicycle helmets for children under age five. The following pages explain in detail CPSC's work in fiscal year 1997, which helped reduce injuries and save lives. As Chairman, and with my esteemed colleagues Vice-Chairman Mary Sheila Gall and Commissioner Thomas Hill Moore, we will see that CPSC continues to share the responsibility of product safety with our product-safety partners, industry and the American public. Sincerely,
    [Show full text]
  • Accidental Death & Dismemberment
    ACCIDENTAL DEATH & DISMEMBERMENT Also included in the Basic and Supplementary protection for the DEFINITION OF LOSS employees only: INSURANCE (AD&D) Comatose Benefit – the amount of the principal sum (1 x annual "Loss" of: salary) will be paid so long as the individual becomes comatose hand or foot: the complete severance through or above the wrist The Accidental Death & Dismemberment program provides within 365 days after the date of the accident and remains so for 60 or ankle joint, but below the elbow or knee joint. benefits for losses or loss of use that occur as the result of an days. : the complete severance through or above the elbow or accident only. Coverage is provided 24 hours per day, on or off arm or leg knee joint. the job. VOLUNTARY PROGRAM thumb: the complete severance of one entire phalanx of the (Optional) thumb. BASIC COVERAGE finger: the complete severance of two entire phalanges of the (Component of Basic Group Life Insurance) This coverage is available to employees and their dependents in units finger. of $10,000 to a maximum principal sum of $500,000. toe: the complete severance of one entire phalanx of the big toe The coverage provided is a principal sum equal to the Basic and all phalanges of other toes. Group Life Insurance (1 x the annual salary), and provides The voluntary coverage can be cancelled at any time. protection for the employee only. The designated beneficiary is eye: the irrecoverable loss of the entire sight. the same as that indicated for the Basic Group Life program.
    [Show full text]
  • Kant and Capital Punishment Today
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UNL | Libraries University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications - Department of Philosophy Philosophy, Department of 2002 Kant and Capital Punishment Today Nelson T. Potter University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/philosfacpub Part of the Philosophy Commons Potter, Nelson T., "Kant and Capital Punishment Today" (2002). Faculty Publications - Department of Philosophy. 5. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/philosfacpub/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications - Department of Philosophy by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in The Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (2002), pp. 267–282. Copyright © 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Used by permission. Kant and Capital Punishment Today Nelson T. Potter, Jr. Department of Philosophy University of Nebraska–Lincoln Lincoln, NE 68588-0321, USA 1. Immanuel Kant was emphatically in favor of the death penalty for the crime of murder, as anyone who knows anything about Kant is likely to know. In sup- port of his view, he made the following statement, sometimes quoted as an exam- ple of extremism in support of capital punishment: Even if a civil society were to be dissolved by the
    [Show full text]
  • Lewis F .. Powell, Jr. Here 1S a Draft Memorandum on the Death Eases. I Would Like to Turn This Over to You to Put in Appropriat
    MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Larry A. Hammond DATE: February 8, 1972 FROM: Lewis F .. Powell, Jr. Death Penalty Cases Here 1s a draft memorandum on the death eases. I would like to turn this over to you to put in appropriate form for some circulation. As you work on this, I would appreciate your keeping In mind the following: 1. As you will observe, there is a threshold question as to what I am writing: is it a possible opinlon for others to consider joining, an opinion expressing my own views concurring in m oplnion of someone else, or is it merely - at this time - a memorandum? As I do not know how the Court wlli finally line up, I am assuming that my view wW be in the minority. I suppose the best posture for the present is to write this as a "memorandum", which could be converted to an oplnion to be joined by others or filed as representing my own views. 2. A second question which needs to be resolved is whether I am writing primarily with respect to Aikens or addressing all four eases together 1n a sweeping opinion.. I would prefer - and have so - \ ~ 7 .... 1-.. ' .. 2. undertaken - to write the Aikens type optnlon. The issue can be stated moat sharply this way. A brief sapplemental oplnloo could be written, addreaed to eaeh of the other cases. While I can ecmeeive of rape cues tn which the death sentence would, to me, be cruel and 1Dlusual pmlsbment, I am not prepared as a judge to say that it is never permissible.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines to the Standards for Recording Human Remains
    Guidelines to the Standards for Recording Human Remains IFA Paper No. 7 Editors: Megan Brickley and Jacqueline I McKinley Guidelines to the Standards for Recording Human Remains Published 2004 by BABAO, Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BF and the Institute of Field Archaeologists, SHES, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 227, Reading RG6 6AB ISBN 0948 393 88 2 Copyright © BABAO, IFA and individual authors Editors: Megan Brickley and Jacqueline I McKinley Contributors: Anthea Boylston, Megan Brickley, Don Brothwell, Brian Connell, Simon Mays, Jacqueline I McKinley, Linda O’Connell, Mike Richards, Charlotte Roberts, Sonia Zakrzewski Acknowledgements Thanks are due to all those who assisted in this publication by reading and making comments on various parts of the document including Andrew Millard, Natasha Powers, James Steele and Bill White, and also contributors who commented on colleagues contributions. Thanks to Professor Sue Black for providing Appendix 1. Thanks are also due to various individuals and organisations for permission to print figures from their sites/reports; Rachel Ives for Figure 1, Wessex Archaeology for Figure 5, Roger Mercer and the Hambledon Hill Project for Figure 7, Dr Kay Prag for Figure 16 and Dr Ingrid Mainland for Figure 17. BRITISH ASSOCIATION FOR BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY AND OSTEOARCHAEOLOGY INSTITUTE OF FIELD ARCHAEOLOGISTS 1 Guidelines to the Standards for Recording Human Remains INSTITUTE OF FIELD ARCHAEOLOGISTS PAPER NO. 7 Editors: Megan Brickley
    [Show full text]