DOCSLIB.ORG

China-Russia Relations in World Politics, 1991-2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
China-Russia Relations in World Politics, 1991-2016 SEEKING LEVERAGE: CHINA-RUSSIA RELATIONS IN WORLD POLITICS, 1991-2016 by Brian G. Carlson A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Baltimore, Maryland April, 2018 © Brian G. Carlson 2018 All rights reserved Abstract In the post-Soviet period, U.S. policymakers have viewed China and Russia as the two great powers with the greatest inclination and capacity to challenge the international order. The two countries would pose especially significant challenges to the United States if they were to act in concert. In addition to this clear policy relevance, the China-Russia relationship poses a number of problems for international relations theory. During this period, China and Russia declined to form an alliance against the United States, as balance-of-power theory might have predicted. Over time, however, the two countries engaged in increasingly close cooperation to constrain U.S. power. These efforts fell short of traditional hard balancing, but they still held important implications for international politics. The actual forms of cooperation were therefore worthy of analysis using concepts from international relations theory, a task that this dissertation attempts. An additional problem concerned Russia’s response to China’s rise. Given the potential threat that it faced, Russia might have been expected to improve relations with the West as a hedge against China’s growing power. Instead, Russia increased its level of diplomatic cooperation with China as its relations with the West deteriorated. This dissertation addresses these problems through a detailed empirical study of the evolution of China-Russia relations from 1991 to 2016, using the within-case method of process tracing. The dissertation uses a modified neoclassical realist framework, which views the structure of the international system as the independent variable and domestic factors as intervening variables. At the level of the international system, unipolarity gave China and Russia incentives to cooperate in order to restrain U.S. power but also limited their ability to balance against U.S. power effectively. Eventually, as both countries’ positions of relative power improved, they sought spheres of influence in their own regions, gaining some room for maneuver from strong relations ii with the other. At the domestic level, a convergence of national identities played a crucial role. The two countries’ shared antipathy toward the concept of a Western-led liberal international order laid the groundwork for a durable relationship, albeit one increasingly tilted in China’s favor. iii Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to the members of my dissertation committee for their comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript, as well as for their support and encouragement. The committee members are Charles Doran (my adviser), Michael Mandelbaum (the committee chairman), David Lampton, Bruce Parrott, and Gilbert Rozman. I also acknowledge generous financial support from a variety of sources that made the completion of this project possible. During the 2013-2014 academic year, I conducted research in Russia with U.S. federal government funding under the Title VIII Combined Research and Language Training Program, administered by American Councils. The Moscow State Institute for International Relations (MGIMO) was my host institution. During the 2014-2015 academic year, I conducted research in China with U.S. federal government funding from the Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation Research Abroad Fellowship. I split my time between Shanghai and Beijing and also conducted research in other cities in China. During the spring of 2015, I was affiliated with Tsinghua University in Beijing. I also received generous support from my own institution, the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). Throughout my Ph.D. studies, I received generous funding from the Bradley Foundation. As a George L. Abernethy Fellow, I was able to spend the 2015-2016 academic year at the SAIS Europe campus in Bologna, Italy, where I wrote early drafts of this dissertation. In addition to several research grants from the SAIS Ph.D. fund, I received funding from the Frederick Hood Research Fund for a trip to Moscow in May and June of 2016 and from the Henry A. Kissinger Center for Global Affairs to present a paper at the International Studies Association conference in San Francisco in April 2018 as part of a panel discussion on China-Russia relations. iv During the final stage of writing and revisions, I was based at the Center for Security Studies (CSS) at ETH in Zurich on a Transatlantic Post-Doctoral Fellowship for International Relations and Security (TAPIR). CSS provided a supportive and congenial atmosphere in which to complete the dissertation. Brian G. Carlson April 2018 v Table of Contents Acknowledgments iv Introduction 1 Chapter 1: International Relations Theory and China-Russia Relations 6 Chapter 2: From the Breakup of the Soviet Union to Strategic Partnership: 1991-1996 72 Chapter 3: From Strategic Partnership to the Treaty of Good-Neighborliness, Friendship, and Cooperation: 1996-2001 143 Chapter 4: From the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001 to the War in Georgia 193 Chapter 5: From the Financial Crisis to the Ukraine Crisis and Its Aftermath 264 Conclusion 335 Bibliography 343 Sources in English 343 Sources in Chinese 359 Sources in Russian 374 List of Interviews 394 Author’s Biography and Curriculum Vitae 397 vi Introduction For much of the period since the breakup of the Soviet Union, U.S. policymakers have viewed China and Russia as the two great powers with the greatest inclination and capacity to challenge the international order that emerged in the wake of the Cold War. The two countries were on different trajectories. China was emerging as a potential peer competitor to the United States, while a weakened Russia sought to recover its great-power status. Both countries resisted U.S. efforts to spread democracy and liberal norms throughout the world. Individually, both countries increasingly challenged U.S. interests in their respective regions. In combination, they could pose the most serious potential challenge to U.S. global leadership. No such combination emerged, as China and Russia refrained from forming an alliance throughout this period. By the middle of the second decade of the twenty-first century, however, U.S. relations with both countries were increasingly fraught. The broad outlines of a potential great-power clash between the United States and a rising China grew increasingly apparent each year. Against this backdrop, a series of maritime disputes between China and its neighbors, including U.S. allies, threatened regional stability in Asia. U.S.-Russia relations, meanwhile, suffered greatly from the Ukraine crisis, plunging to their lowest level since the end of the Cold War. Under these circumstances, the possibility of an anti-Western, China-Russia geopolitical alignment, or even potentially an alliance, reemerged with new urgency. The China-Russia relationship not only presents policy challenges for world leaders, but also holds intriguing implications for international relations theory. Most studies of China-Russia relations focus on policy implications, making little or no reference to theory. International relations theorists frequently draw upon this relationship for examples and insights but rarely make detailed empirical study of it. Both approaches have value, but an approach combining theory and 1 policy could also prove fruitful. Insights from theory may help to explain various aspects of this relationship. The empirical study of China-Russia relations, in turn, may help to inform theory. This study attempts both tasks, focusing on the period from the breakup of the Soviet Union in late 1991 to the end of 2016. In an effort to explain the evolution of China-Russia relations during this period, this study borrows a general framework from the school of foreign policy analysis known as neoclassical realism. In this approach, the structure of the international system is the main independent variable, domestic factors are intervening variables, and foreign policy decisions are the dependent variable. Neoclassical realism is a paradigm for studying foreign policy decisions rather than a theory. It therefore offers some flexibility in application. While employing a neoclassical realist framework, this study makes some important modifications to the framework compared to the way in which previous studies have employed it. In its conception of systemic factors, this study looks beyond the relatively static view of structure inherent in structural realism. It considers the impact of changes in relative power, which are crucial for understanding the relationship’s evolution during this period. When considering domestic factors, this study focuses on the important role of national identity in conditioning states’ responses to systemic influences. In contrast with pure constructivist approaches, which discount the importance of the structure of the international system, this study conceives of national identity as an intervening variable that mediates structural effects in shaping foreign policy outcomes. Both domestic factors and interactions with other states drive the formation of national identity. The resulting national identity, in turn, shapes the state’s reaction to the incentives and constraints that the structure of the international
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Britton, Theodore R. Jr. – 1981
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project Ralph J Bunch Legacy: Minority Officers AMBASSADOR THEODORE R. BRITTON, JR. Interviewed by: Ruth Stutts Njiiri Initial interview date: July 16, 1981 Copyri ht 2008 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Ambassador to Barbados and Grenada' Special Representative to Antigua, Dominica, St Christopher-,evis-Anguilla, St Lucia, and St -incent 1.70-1.77 Bac1ground of appointment Barbados environment 2S presence and facilities Relations Foreign diplomatic community Family Being a blac1 Ambassador Embassy staff Relations with State Department Marriott Corporation Consular offices Loss of son South Carolina and New 5or1 bac1ground ,omination as Ambassador H2D in South Carolina Residence in New 5or1 City Confirmation Hearing Government officials British Cubans 2S Airline problem Grenada relations Churches Personal sources of inspiration The 6ueen7s visit Family INTERVIEW 1 &: This is an interview with Ambassador Theodore R. Britton, Jr. as part of a Phelps, Sto-es Fund oral history project on former Blac- Chiefs of Mission, funded by the Ford .oundation. Ambassador Britton served in Barbados and the State of 1renada and as 2.S. Special Representative to the States of Anti ua, Dominica, St. Christopher, Nevis, An uilla, St. Lucia and St. 4incent. He served in these countries from 1977 to 1977. He is presently Actin Assistant to the Secretary for International Affairs, Department of 5ousin and 2rban Development. The interview is bein conducted on Thursday, July 16, 1981 in the
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 2003
    METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON AIRPORTS AUTHORITY COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Norman M. Glasgow, Jr., Chairman Mame Reiley, Vice Chairman Robert Clarke Brown Honorable H.R. Crawford Anne Crossman Mamadi Diané Honorable John Paul Hammerschmidt William A. Hazel Weldon H. Latham David T. Ralston, Jr. Charles D. Snelling Honorable David G. Speck Jeffrey Earl Thompson EXECUTIVE STAFF James E. Bennett, President and Chief Executive Officer Margaret E. McKeough, Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer * Lynn Hampton, CPA, Vice President for Finance and Chief Financial Officer Anne M. Field, CPA, Controller * Effective April 1, 2004. Prepared by the Office of Finance METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON AIRPORTS AUTHORITY Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory Section Page Transmittal Letter ................................................................. 1 2002 Certificate of Achievement .................................................... 11 Organization Chart............................................................... 12 Financial Section Report of Independent Auditors..................................................... 13 Management’s Discussion and Analysis.............................................. 15 Financial Statements Statements of Net Assets ...................................................... 28 Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets ........................ 30 Statements of Cash Flows....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary China: a Book List
    PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: Woodrow Wilson School, Politics Department, East Asian Studies Program CONTEMPORARY CHINA: A BOOK LIST by Lubna Malik and Lynn White Winter 2007-2008 Edition This list is available on the web at: http://www.princeton.edu/~lynn/chinabib.pdf which can be viewed and printed with an Adobe Acrobat Reader. Variation of font sizes may cause pagination to differ slightly in the web and paper editions. No list of books can be totally up-to-date. Please surf to find further items. Also consult http://www.princeton.edu/~lynn/chinawebs.doc for clicable URLs. This list of items in English has several purposes: --to help advise students' course essays, junior papers, policy workshops, and senior theses about contemporary China; --to supplement the required reading lists of courses on "Chinese Development" and "Chinese Politics," for which students may find books to review in this list; --to provide graduate students with a list that may suggest books for paper topics and may slightly help their study for exams in Chinese politics; a few of the compiler's favorite books are starred on the list, but not much should be made of this because such books may be old or the subjects may not meet present interests; --to supplement a bibliography of all Asian serials in the Princeton Libraries that was compiled long ago by Frances Chen and Maureen Donovan; many of these are now available on the web,e.g., from “J-Stor”; --to suggest to book selectors in the Princeton libraries items that are suitable for acquisition; to provide a computerized list on which researchers can search for keywords of interests; and to provide a resource that many teachers at various other universities have also used.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Foreign Policy Change and Continuity in National Identity
    Russia’s Foreign Policy Russia’s Foreign Policy Change and Continuity in National Identity Second Edition Andrei P. Tsygankov ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD PUBLISHERS, INC. Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK Published by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. A wholly owned subsidiary of The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706 http://www.rowmanlittlefield.com Estover Road, Plymouth PL6 7PY, United Kingdom Copyright © 2010 by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without written permission from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote passages in a review. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Tsygankov, Andrei P., 1964- Russia's foreign policy : change and continuity in national identity / Andrei P. Tsygankov. -- 2nd ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-7425-6752-8 (cloth : alk. paper) -- ISBN 978-0-7425-6753-5 (paper : alk. paper) -- ISBN 978-0-7425-6754-2 (electronic) 1. Russia (Federation)--Foreign relations. 2. Soviet Union--Foreign relations. 3. Great powers. 4. Russia (Federation)--Foreign relations--Western countries. 5. Western countries--Foreign relations--Russia (Federation) 6. Nationalism--Russia (Federation) 7. Social change--Russia (Federation) I. Title. DK510.764.T785 2010 327.47--dc22 2009049396 ™ The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992. Printed in the United States of America It is the eternal dispute between those who imagine the world to suit their policy, and those who arrange their policy to suit the realities of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian History: a Brief Chronology (998-2000)
    Russian History: A Brief Chronology (998-2000) 1721 Sweden cedes the eastern shores of the Baltic Sea to Russia (Treaty of Nystad). In celebration, Peter’s title Kievan Russia is changed from tsar to Emperor of All Russia Abolition of the Patrarchate of Moscow. Religious authority passes to the Holy Synod and its Ober- prokuror, appointed by the tsar. 988 Conversion to Christianity 1722 Table of Ranks 1237-1240 Mongol Invasion 1723-25 The Persian Campaign. Persia cedes western and southern shores of the Caspian to Russia Muscovite Russia 1724 Russia’s Academy of Sciences is established 1725 Peter I dies on February 8 1380 The Battle of Kulikovo 1725-1727 Catherine I 1480 End of Mongol Rule 1727-1730 Peter II 1462-1505 Ivan III 1730-1740 Anne 1505-1533 Basil III 1740-1741 Ivan VI 1533-1584 Ivan the Terrible 1741-1762 Elizabeth 1584-98 Theodore 1744 Sophie Friederike Auguste von Anhalt-Zerbst arrives in Russia and assumes the name of Grand Duchess 1598-1613 The Time of Troubles Catherine Alekseevna after her marriage to Grand Duke Peter (future Peter III) 1613-45 Michael Romanoff 1762 Peter III 1645-76 Alexis 1762 Following a successful coup d’etat in St. Petersburg 1672-82 Theodore during which Peter III is assassinated, Catherine is proclaimed Emress of All Russia Imperial Russia 1762-1796 Catherine the Great 1767 Nakaz (The Instruction) 1772-1795 Partitions of Poland 1682-1725 Peter I 1773-1774 Pugachev Rebellion 1689 The Streltsy Revolt and Suppression; End of Sophia’s Regency 1785 Charter to the Nobility 1695-96 The Azov Campaigns 1791 Establishment fo the Pale of Settlement (residential restrictions on Jews) in the parts of Poland with large 1697-98 Peter’s travels abroad (The Grand Embassy) Jewish populations, annexed to Russia in the partitions of Poland (1772, 1793, and 1795) and in the 1698 The revolt and the final suppression of the Streltsy Black Sea liitoral annexed from Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    NOTES Introduction 1. Robert Kagan to George Packer. Cited in Packer’s The Assassin’s Gate: America In Iraq (Faber and Faber, London, 2006): 38. 2. Stefan Halper and Jonathan Clarke, America Alone: The Neoconservatives and the Global Order (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004): 9. 3. Critiques of the war on terror and its origins include Gary Dorrien, Imperial Designs: Neoconservatism and the New Pax Americana (Routledge, New York and London, 2004); Francis Fukuyama, After the Neocons: America At the Crossroads (Profile Books, London, 2006); Ira Chernus, Monsters to Destroy: The Neoconservative War on Terror and Sin (Paradigm Publishers, Boulder, CO and London, 2006); and Jacob Heilbrunn, They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons (Doubleday, New York, 2008). 4. A report of the PNAC, Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century, September 2000: 76. URL: http:// www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf (15 January 2009). 5. On the first generation on Cold War neoconservatives, which has been covered far more extensively than the second, see Gary Dorrien, The Neoconservative Mind: Politics, Culture and the War of Ideology (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1993); Peter Steinfels, The Neoconservatives: The Men Who Are Changing America’s Politics (Simon and Schuster, New York, 1979); Murray Friedman, The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005); Murray Friedman ed. Commentary in American Life (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 2005); Mark Gerson, The Neoconservative Vision: From the Cold War to the Culture Wars (Madison Books, Lanham MD; New York; Oxford, 1997); and Maria Ryan, “Neoconservative Intellectuals and the Limitations of Governing: The Reagan Administration and the Demise of the Cold War,” Comparative American Studies, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Europeanization of British Defence Policy
    Copyright material EUROPEANIZATION OF BRITISH DEFENCE POLICY www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com Copyright material www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com Dedicated to the memory of Anne and Ron Dover Copyright material Europeanization of British Defence Policy www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com ROBERT DOVER King’s College London,www.ashgate.com UK www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com Copyright material © Robert Dover 2007 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Robert Dover has asserted his moral right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the author of this work. www.ashgate.com Published by Ashgate Publishing Limited Ashgate Publishing Company Gower House Suite 420 Croft Road 101 Cherry Street www.ashgate.com Aldershot Burlington, VT 05401-4405 Hampshire GU11 3HR USA England Ashgate website: http://www.ashgate.com www.ashgate.com British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Dover, Robert Europeanization of British defence policy 1. Great Britain - Military policy 2. Great Britainwww.ashgate.com - Foreign relations - 1997- 3. Great Britain - Foreign relations - European Union countries 4. European Union countries - Foreign relations - Great Britain I.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual-Report-2018 Eng.Pdf
    Russian International Affairs Council CONTENTS /01 GENERAL INFORMATION 4 /02 RIAC PROGRAM ACTIVITIES 16 /03 RIAC IN THE MEDIA 58 /04 RIAC WEBSITE 60 /05 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 62 3 Russian International ANNUAL REPORT 2018 Affairs Council The General Meeting of RIAC members is the The main task of the RIAC Scientific Council is to ABOUT THE COUNCIL supreme governing body of the Partnership. The formulate sound recommendations for strategic key function of the General Meeting is to ensure decisions in RIAC expert, research, and publishing The non-profit partnership Russian compliance with the goals of the Partnership. The activities. General Meeting includes 160 members of the International Affairs Council (NP RIAC) is Council. The Vice-Presidency was introduced to achieve 01 the goals of the Partnership in cooperation with a Russian membership-based non-profit The RIAC Board of Trustees is a supervisory body government bodies and local authorities of the organization. The partnership was established of the Partnership that monitors the activities of Russian Federation and foreign states, the Partnership and their compliance with the international organizations, and Russian and by the resolution of its founders pursuant statutory goals. foreign legal entities. The candidate for Vice- President is approved by the RIAC Presidium for a to Decree No. 59-rp of the President of the The Presidium of the Partnership is a permanent one-year term. Russian Federation “On the Establishment collegial governing body of the Partnership that consists of not less than five and no more than RIAC Corporate Members of the Non-Profit Partnership Russian fifteen members, including the President and According to the Charter, legal citizens of the the Director General of the Partnership, who Russian Federation or entities established in International Affairs Council” dated February 2, have a vote in the decision-making process.
    [Show full text]
  • Russi-Monitor-Monthl
    MONTHLY May 2020 CONTENTS 3 17 28 POLAND AND DENMARK BEGIN BELARUS RAMPS UP RUSSIAN ECONOMY COMES CONSTRUCTION OF BALTIC DIVERSIFICATION EFFORTS BADLY BECAUSE OF PANDEMIC PIPE PROJECT TO CHALLENGE WITH U.S. AND GULF CRUDE RUSSIAN GAS DOMINANCE PURCHASES POLAND AND DENMARK BEGIN CONSTRUCTION OF BALTIC PIPE PROJECT CORONAVIRUS IN RUSSIA: BAD NEWS FOR 3 TO CHALLENGE RUSSIAN GAS DOMINANCE 20 THE COUNTRY MOSCOW: THE CAPITAL RUSSIA UNVEILS RESCUE PLAN FOR OIL 5 OF RUSSIAN CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK 22 SECTOR VLADIMIR PUTIN SUFFERS PRESTIGIOUS 6 FAILURE IN VICTORY DAY CELEBRATIONS 23 TENSIONS RISE IN THE BLACK SEA RUSSIA EASES LOCKDOWN YET OFFERS ROSNEFT, TRANSNEFT IN NEW FEUD OVER 8 LITTLE SUPPORT TO CITIZENS 25 TRANSPORTATION TARIFFS ROSNEFT’S SECHIN ASKS OFFICIALS FOR NEW TAX RELIEFS DESPITE RECENT GAZPROM IS TURNING TOWARDS CHINA, 10 MISHAPS 27 BUT THERE ARE PROBLEMS FRADKOV REMAINS AT THE HELM OF THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY COMES BADLY 12 KREMLIN’S “INTELLIGENCE SERVICE” 28 BECAUSE OF PANDEMIC RUSSIA STEPS UP DIPLOMATIC EFFORTS AS RUSSIA AIMS TO BOOST MILITARY FACILITIES 14 KREMLIN AIDE KOZAK VISITS BERLIN 30 IN SYRIA GAZPROM’S NATURAL GAS EXPORT RUSSIA–NATO TENSIONS CONTINUE ON 16 REVENUE DECLINED DRAMATICALLY IN Q1 32 BOTH FLANKS BELARUS RAMPS UP DIVERSIFICATION RUSSIA, BELARUS SQUABBLE OVER GAS EFFORTS WITH U.S. AND GULF CRUDE DELIVERIES IN NEW CHAPTER OF ENERGY 17 PURCHASES 34 WAR RUSSIA’S ROSNEFT HAS NEW OWNERSHIP RUSSIA FACES BIGGEST MILITARY THREAT 19 STRUCTURE BUT SAME CEO 36 FROM WEST, SHOIGU SAYS 2 www.warsawinstitute.org 4 May 2020 POLAND AND DENMARK BEGIN CONSTRUCTION OF BALTIC PIPE PROJECT TO CHALLENGE RUSSIAN GAS DOMINANCE Construction of a major gas pipeline from Norway is to begin in the coming days, Polish President Andrzej Duda said in the morning of May 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Organized Crime and the Russian State Challenges to U.S.-Russian Cooperation
    Organized Crime and the Russian State Challenges to U.S.-Russian Cooperation J. MICHAEL WALLER "They write I'm the mafia's godfather. It was Vladimir Ilich Lenin who was the real organizer of the mafia and who set up the criminal state." -Otari Kvantrishvili, Moscow organized crime leader.l "Criminals Nave already conquered the heights of the state-with the chief of the KGB as head of a mafia group." -Former KGB Maj. Gen. Oleg Kalugin.2 Introduction As the United States and Russia launch a Great Crusade against organized crime, questions emerge not only about the nature of joint cooperation, but about the nature of organized crime itself. In addition to narcotics trafficking, financial fraud and racketecring, Russian organized crime poses an even greater danger: the theft and t:rafficking of weapons of mass destruction. To date, most of the discussion of organized crime based in Russia and other former Soviet republics has emphasized the need to combat conven- tional-style gangsters and high-tech terrorists. These forms of criminals are a pressing danger in and of themselves, but the problem is far more profound. Organized crime-and the rarnpant corruption that helps it flourish-presents a threat not only to the security of reforms in Russia, but to the United States as well. The need for cooperation is real. The question is, Who is there in Russia that the United States can find as an effective partner? "Superpower of Crime" One of the greatest mistakes the West can make in working with former Soviet republics to fight organized crime is to fall into the trap of mirror- imaging.
    [Show full text]
  • Organized Crime 1.1 Gaizer’S Criminal Group
    INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER I. ORGANIZED CRIME 1.1 Gaizer’s Criminal Group ..................................................................................6 1.2 Bandits in St. Petersburg ............................................................................ 10 1.3 The Tsapok Gang .......................................................................................... 14 Chapter II.CThe Corrupt Officials 2.1 «I Fell in Love with a Criminal» ................................................................20 2.2 Female Thief with a Birkin Bag ...............................................................24 2.3 «Moscow Crime Boss».................................................................................29 CONTENTS CHAPTER III. THE BRibE-TAKERS 3.1 Governor Khoroshavin’s medal «THE CRIMINAL RUSSIA PARTY», AN INDEPENDENT EXPERT REPORT «For Merit to the Fatherland» ..................................................................32 PUBLISHED IN MOSCOW, AUGUST 2016 3.2 The Astrakhan Brigade ...............................................................................36 AUTHOR: ILYA YASHIN 3.3 A Character from the 1990s ......................................................................39 MATERiaL COMPILING: VERONIKA SHULGINA HAPTER HE ROOKS TRANSLATION: C 4. T C EVGENia KARA-MURZA 4.1 Governor Nicknamed Hans .......................................................................42 GRAPHICS: PavEL YELIZAROV 4.2 The Party
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 25 Uniform Titles Part 1
    CHAPTER 25 UNIFORM TITLES Revised: October 2010 25.1. USE OF UNIFORM TITLES 25.1A. Uniform titles can be used for different purposes. They provide the means: for bringing together all catalogue entries of a work when various manifestations (e.g. editions, translations) of it have appeared under various titles; for identifying a work when the title by which it is known differs from the title proper of the item being catalogued; for differentiating between two or more works published under identical titles proper; for organizing the file. The need to use uniform titles varies from one catalogue to another and varies within one catalogue. Base the decision whether to use a uniform title in a particular instance on one or more of the following, as appropriate: 1) how well the work is known 2) how many manifestations of the work are involved 3) whether another work with the same title proper has been identified (see 25.5B) 4) whether the main entry is under title (see 21.1C) 5) whether the work was originally in another language 6) the extent to which the catalogue is used for research purposes. NOTE: Chapter 25 is optional. Although this chapter describes an instructional set of rules, use these rules according to the varying policies of the cataloging agency. LC rule interpretation: Applicability Use a uniform title unless the complete uniform title that would be assigned is exactly the same as the title proper of the item. Exceptions 1) Do not use a uniform title when the only difference is the presence of an initial article in the bibliographic title proper.
    [Show full text]