DOCSLIB.ORG

GEF Country Portfolio Evaluation: Cameroon (1992–2007)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GEF Country Portfolio Evaluation: Cameroon (1992–2007) GEF Country Portfolio Evaluation: Cameroon (1992–2007) MARCH 2009 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Evaluation Office GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY Global Environment Facility Evaluation Office GEF Country Portfolio Evaluation: Cameroon (1992–2007) March 2009 (The main findings and recommendations of this evaluation were presented to the GEF Council in November 2008.) Evaluation Report No. 45 © 2009 Global Environment Facility Evaluation Office 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433 Internet: www.gefeo.org Email: [email protected] All rights reserved. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the GEF Council or the governments they represent. The GEF Evaluation Office does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denomi- nations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the GEF concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The GEF encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission promptly. ISBN-10: 1-933992-20-4 ISBN-13: 978-1-933992-20-4 [Note that the ISBN for this publication was corrected June 2009 and consequently differs from that in the printed version.] Credits Director of the GEF Evaluation Office: Robert D. van den Berg Task Manager: Lee Alexander Risby, Evaluation Officer, GEF Evaluation Office Evaluation Team: Kai Schmidt-Soltau, Paolo Cerutti, Julius Chupezi-Tieguhong, and Joachim Nguieboouri, consultants Editing and design: Nita Congress Printing: Professional Graphics Printing Co. Cover photo: “The Road to Results,” Paolo Cerutti. Evaluation Report No. 45 A FREE PUBLICATION Contents EN FRANÇAIS Avant-propos .............................................................................................................................. F-1 Remerciements .......................................................................................................................... F-3 1. Principales conclusions et recommandations ...................................................................F-4 1.1 Contexte ........................................................................................................................................................ F-4 1.2 Méthodologie .............................................................................................................................................. F-5 1.3 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................................. F-6 1.4 Recommandations ....................................................................................................................................F-10 1.5 Questions émergentes concernant le DAR ........................................................................................F-12 Notes ....................................................................................................................................................................F-12 ENGLISH Foreword ......................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................................... iii Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................... iv 1. Main Conclusions and Recommendations ........................................................................... 1 1.1. Background ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Evaluation Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Recommendations .......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.5 Emerging Issues Relating to the RAF ......................................................................................................... 8 Notes .......................................................................................................................................................................... 9 2. Evaluation Framework .......................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Objectives ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Key Questions ............................................................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Methodology.................................................................................................................................................. 11 2.4 Scope of the Evaluation ............................................................................................................................... 12 2.5 Limitations ..................................................................................................................................................... 13 iii 2.6 Implementation ............................................................................................................................................ 14 Notes ........................................................................................................................................................................ 14 3. Context of the Evaluation ..................................................................................................... 15 3.1 Country Context ........................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Environmental Resources in GEF Focal Areas ...................................................................................... 16 3.3 Environmental Legal Framework ............................................................................................................. 22 Notes ........................................................................................................................................................................ 25 4. The GEF Portfolio in Cameroon ............................................................................................ 26 4.1 Portfolio Breakdown .................................................................................................................................... 26 4.2 GEF Support in the Context of Total ODA ............................................................................................ 34 Notes ........................................................................................................................................................................ 35 5. Results of GEF Support to Cameroon .................................................................................. 36 5.1 Potential Results of Projects under Implementation ........................................................................... 36 5.2 Catalytic Effects ............................................................................................................................................ 45 5.3 Sustainability ................................................................................................................................................. 46 Notes ........................................................................................................................................................................ 50 6. Relevance of GEF Support to Cameroon ............................................................................. 51 6.1 Integration of the GEF into National Sustainable Development ...................................................... 51 6.2 GEF Funding and Ownership .................................................................................................................... 53 6.3 RAF Relevance to Cameroon .................................................................................................................... 54 6.4 GEF Support for Environmental Action Plans ...................................................................................... 56 6.5 Relevance of GEF Support for Global Environmental Benefits ......................................................... 57 Notes ........................................................................................................................................................................ 58 7. Efficiency of GEF-Supported Activities in Cameroon ......................................................... 59 7.1 Time and Effort Needed to Develop and Implement a Project ........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Page 1 C H a D N I G E R N I G E R I a G a B O N CENTRAL AFRICAN
    CAMEROON: LOCATIONS OF UNHCR PERSONS OF CONCERN (November 2019) 1,713,168 PERSONS UNDER THE COMPETENCENIGER OF UNHCR 271,566 CAR REFUGEES IN RURAL AREAS 107,423 NIG REFUGEES IN RURAL AREAS 26,305 URBAN REFUGEES 9,688 ASYLUM SEEKERS 950,263 INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS (IDPs) Kousseri LOGONE 347,923 RETURNEES ET CHARI Waza Limani Magdeme Number of refugees EXTRÊME-NORD MAYO SAVA < 3,000 Mora Mokolo Maroua CHAD > 5,000 Minawao DIAMARÉ MAYO TSANAGA MAYO KANI > 20,000 MAYO DANAY MAYO LOUTI Number of IDPs < 2,000 > 5,000 NIGERIA BÉNOUÉ > 20,000 Number of returnees NORD < 2,000 FARO MAYO REY > 5,000 Touboro > 20,000 FARO ET DÉO Beke chantier Ndip Beka VINA Number of asylum seekers Djohong DONGA < 5,000 ADAMAOUA Borgop MENCHUM MANTUNG Meiganga Ngam NORD-OUEST MAYO BANYO DJEREM Alhamdou MBÉRÉ BOYO Gbatoua BUI Kounde MEZAM MANYU MOMO NGO KETUNJIA CENTRAL Bamenda NOUN BAMBOUTOS AFRICAN LEBIALEM OUEST Gado Badzere MIFI MBAM ET KIM MENOUA KOUNG KHI REPUBLIC LOM ET DJEREM KOUPÉ HAUTS PLATEAUX NDIAN MANENGOUBA HAUT NKAM SUD-OUEST NDÉ Timangolo MOUNGO MBAM ET HAUTE SANAGA MEME Bertoua Mbombe Pana INOUBOU CENTRE Batouri NKAM Sandji Mbile Buéa LITTORAL KADEY Douala LEKIÉ MEFOU ET Lolo FAKO AFAMBA YAOUNDE Mbombate Yola SANAGA WOURI NYONG ET MARITIME MFOUMOU MFOUNDI NYONG EST Ngarissingo ET KÉLLÉ MEFOU ET HAUT NYONG AKONO Mboy LEGEND Refugee location NYONG ET SO’O Refugee Camp OCÉAN MVILA UNHCR Representation DJA ET LOBO BOUMBA Bela SUD ET NGOKO Libongo UNHCR Sub-Office VALLÉE DU NTEM UNHCR Field Office UNHCR Field Unit Region boundary Departement boundary Roads GABON EQUATORIAL 100 Km CONGO ± GUINEA The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA Source: IOM, OCHA, UNHCR – Novembre 2019 Pour plus d’information, veuillez contacter Jean Luc KRAMO ([email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • Aerial Surveys of Wildlife and Human Activity Across the Bouba N'djida
    Aerial Surveys of Wildlife and Human Activity Across the Bouba N’djida - Sena Oura - Benoue - Faro Landscape Northern Cameroon and Southwestern Chad April - May 2015 Paul Elkan, Roger Fotso, Chris Hamley, Soqui Mendiguetti, Paul Bour, Vailia Nguertou Alexandre, Iyah Ndjidda Emmanuel, Mbamba Jean Paul, Emmanuel Vounserbo, Etienne Bemadjim, Hensel Fopa Kueteyem and Kenmoe Georges Aime Wildlife Conservation Society Ministry of Forests and Wildlife (MINFOF) L'Ecole de Faune de Garoua Funded by the Great Elephant Census Paul G. Allen Foundation and WCS SUMMARY The Bouba N’djida - Sena Oura - Benoue - Faro Landscape is located in north Cameroon and extends into southwest Chad. It consists of Bouba N’djida, Sena Oura, Benoue and Faro National Parks, in addition to 25 safari hunting zones. Along with Zakouma NP in Chad and Waza NP in the Far North of Cameroon, the landscape represents one of the most important areas for savanna elephant conservation remaining in Central Africa. Aerial wildlife surveys in the landscape were first undertaken in 1977 by Van Lavieren and Esser (1979) focusing only on Bouba N’djida NP. They documented a population of 232 elephants in the park. After a long period with no systematic aerial surveys across the area, Omondi et al (2008) produced a minimum count of 525 elephants for the entire landscape. This included 450 that were counted in Bouba N’djida NP and its adjacent safari hunting zones. The survey also documented a high richness and abundance of other large mammals in the Bouba N’djida NP area, and to the southeast of Faro NP. In the period since 2010, a number of large-scale elephant poaching incidents have taken place in Bouba N’djida NP.
    [Show full text]
  • Cameroon Risk Profile
    019 2 DISASTER RISK PROFILE Flood Drought Cameroon Building Disaster Resilience to Natural Hazards in Sub-Saharan African Regions, Countries and Communities This project is funded by the European Union © CIMA Research Foundation PROJECT TEAM International Centre on Environmental Monitoring Via Magliotto 2. 17100 Savona. Italy Authors Roberto Rudari [1] 2019 - Review Amjad Abbashar [2] Sjaak Conijn [4] Africa Disaster Risk Profiles are co-financed by the Silvia De Angeli [1] Hans de Moel [3] EU-funded ACP-EU Natural Disaster Risk Reduction Auriane Denis-Loupot [2] Program and the ACP-EU Africa Disaster Risk Financing Luca Ferraris [1;5] Program, managed by UNDRR. Tatiana Ghizzoni [1] Isabel Gomes [1] Diana Mosquera Calle [2] Katarina Mouakkid Soltesova [2] DISCLAIMER Marco Massabò [1] Julius Njoroge Kabubi [2] This document is the product of work performed by Lauro Rossi [1] CIMA Research Foundation staff. Luca Rossi [2] The views expressed in this publication do not Roberto Schiano Lomoriello [2] Eva Trasforini [1] necessarily reflect the views of the UNDRR or the EU. The designations employed and the presentation of the Scientific Team material do not imply the expression of any opinion Nazan An [7] Chiara Arrighi [1;6] whatsoever on the part of the UNDRR or the EU Valerio Basso [1] concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city Guido Biondi [1] or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the Alessandro Burastero [1] Lorenzo Campo [1] delineation of its frontiers or boundaries. Fabio Castelli [1;6] Mirko D'Andrea [1] Fabio Delogu [1] Giulia Ercolani[1;6] RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Elisabetta Fiori [1] The material in this work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • CMR-3W-Cash-Transfer-Partners V3.4
    CAMEROON: 3W Operational Presence - Cash Programming [as of December 2016] Organizations working for cash 10 programs in Cameroon Organizations working in Organizations by Cluster Food security 5 International NGO 5 Multi-Sector cash 5 Government 2 Economic Recovery 3 Red Cross & Red /Livelihood 2 Crescent Movement Nutrition 1 UN Agency 1 WASH 1 Number of organizations Multi-Sector Cash by departments 15 5 distinct organizations 9 organizations conducting only emergency programs 1 organizations conducting only regular programs Number of organizations by departments 15 Economic Recovery/Livelihood Food security 3 distinct organizations 5 distinct organizations Number of organizations Number of organizations by department by department 15 15 Nutrition WASH 3 distinct organizations 1 organization Number of organizations Number of organizations by department by department 15 15 Creation: December 2016 Sources: Cash Working group, UNOCHA and NGOs More information: https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/cameroon/cash )HHGEDFNRFKDFDPHURRQ#XQRUJ 7KHERXQGDULHVDQGQDPHVVKRZQDQGWKHGHVLJQDWLRQVXVHGRQWKLVPDSGRQRWLPSO\RI̙FLDOHQGRUVHPHQWRUDFFHSWDQFHE\WKH8QLWHG1DWLRQV CAMEROON:CAMEROON: 3W Operational Presence - Cash Programming [as of December 2016] ADAMAOUA FAR NORTH NORTH 4 distinct organizations 9 distinct organizations 1 organization DJEREM DIAMARE FARO MINJEC CRF MINEPAT CRS IRC MAYO-BANYO LOGONE-ET-CHARI MAYO-LOUTI MINEPAT MINEPAT WFP, PLAN CICR MMBERE MAYO-REY PLAN PUI MINEPAT CENTRE MAYO-DANAY 1 organization MINEPAT LITTORAL 1 organization
    [Show full text]
  • N I G E R I a C H a D Central African Republic Congo
    CAMEROON: LOCATIONS OF UNHCR PERSONS OF CONCERN (September 2020) ! PERSONNES RELEVANT DE Maïné-Soroa !Magaria LA COMPETENCE DU HCR (POCs) Geidam 1,951,731 Gashua ! ! CAR REFUGEES ING CurAi MEROON 306,113 ! LOGONE NIG REFUGEES IN CAMEROON ET CHARI !Hadejia 116,409 Jakusko ! U R B A N R E F U G E E S (CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC AND 27,173 NIGERIAN REFUGEE LIVING IN URBAN AREA ARE INCLUDED) Kousseri N'Djamena !Kano ASYLUM SEEKERS 9,332 Damaturu Maiduguri Potiskum 1,032,942 INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSO! NS (IDPs) * RETURNEES * Waza 484,036 Waza Limani Magdeme Number of refugees MAYO SAVA Mora ! < 10,000 EXTRÊME-NORD Mokolo DIAMARÉ Biu < 50,000 ! Maroua ! Minawao MAYO Bauchi TSANAGA Yagoua ! Gom! be Mubi ! MAYO KANI !Deba MAYO DANAY < 75000 Kaele MAYO LOUTI !Jos Guider Number! of IDPs N I G E R I A Lafia !Ləre ! < 10,000 ! Yola < 50,000 ! BÉNOUÉ C H A D Jalingo > 75000 ! NORD Moundou Number of returnees ! !Lafia Poli Tchollire < 10,000 ! FARO MAYO REY < 50,000 Wukari ! ! Touboro !Makurdi Beke Chantier > 75000 FARO ET DÉO Tingere ! Beka Paoua Number of asylum seekers Ndip VINA < 10,000 Bocaranga ! ! Borgop Djohong Banyo ADAMAOUA Kounde NORD-OUEST Nkambe Ngam MENCHUM DJEREM Meiganga DONGA MANTUNG MAYO BANYO Tibati Gbatoua Wum BOYO MBÉRÉ Alhamdou !Bozoum Fundong Kumbo BUI CENTRAL Mbengwi MEZAM Ndop MOMO AFRICAN NGO Bamenda KETUNJIA OUEST MANYU Foumban REPUBLBICaoro BAMBOUTOS ! LEBIALEM Gado Mbouda NOUN Yoko Mamfe Dschang MIFI Bandjoun MBAM ET KIM LOM ET DJEREM Baham MENOUA KOUNG KHI KOUPÉ Bafang MANENGOUBA Bangangte Bangem HAUT NKAM Calabar NDÉ SUD-OUEST
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Prunus Africana Bark Exploitation Methods and Sustainable Exploitation in the South West, North-West and Adamaoua Regions of Cameroon
    GCP/RAF/408/EC « MOBILISATION ET RENFORCEMENT DES CAPACITES DES PETITES ET MOYENNES ENTREPRISES IMPLIQUEES DANS LES FILIERES DES PRODUITS FORESTIERS NON LIGNEUX EN AFRIQUE CENTRALE » Assessment of Prunus africana bark exploitation methods and sustainable exploitation in the South west, North-West and Adamaoua regions of Cameroon CIFOR Philip Fonju Nkeng, Verina Ingram, Abdon Awono February 2010 Avec l‟appui financier de la Commission Européenne Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................... i ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................... ii Abstract .................................................................................................................. iii 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Problem statement ...................................................................................... 2 1.3 Research questions .......................................................................................... 2 1.4 Objectives ....................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Importance of the study ................................................................................... 3 2: Literature Review .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cameroon: Refugee Sites and Villages for Refugees from the Central African Republic in Nord, Adamaoua and Est Region 01 Jun 2015 REP
    Cameroon: Refugee sites and villages for Refugees from the Central African Republic in Nord, Adamaoua and Est region 01 Jun 2015 REP. OF Faro CHAD NORD Mayo-Rey Mbodo Djakon Faro-et-Deo Beke chantier Dompta Goundjel Vina Ndip Beka Yamba Belel Yarmbang ADAMAOUA Borgop Nyambaka Digou Djohong Ouro-Adde Adamou Garga Mbondo Babongo Dakere Djohong Pela Ngam Garga Fada Mbewe Ngaoui Libona Gandinang Mboula Mbarang Gbata Bafouck Alhamdou Meiganga Ngazi Simi Bigoro Meiganga Mikila Mbere Bagodo Goro Meidougou Kombo Djerem Laka Kounde Gadi Lokoti Gbatoua Dir Foulbe Gbatoua Godole Mbale Bindiba Mbonga CENTRAL Dang Patou Garoua-Boulai AFRICAN Yokosire REPUBLIC Gado Mborguene Badzere Nandoungue Betare Mombal Mbam-et-Kim Bouli Oya Ndokayo Sodenou Zembe Ndanga Borongo Gandima UNHCR Sub-Office Garga Sarali UNHCR Field Office Lom-Et-Djerem UNHCR Field Unit Woumbou Ouli Tocktoyo Refugee Camp Refugee Location Returnee Location Guiwa Region Boundary Yangamo Departement boundary Kette Major roads Samba Roma Minor roads CENTRE Bedobo Haute-Sanaga Boulembe Mboumama Moinam Tapare Boubara Gbiti Adinkol Mobe Timangolo Bertoua Bertoua Mandjou Gbakim Bazzama Bombe Belebina Bougogo Sandji 1 Pana Nguindi Kambele Batouri Bakombo Batouri Nyabi Bandongoue Belita II Belimbam Mbile EST Sandji 2 Mboum Kadei Lolo Pana Kenzou Nyong-et-Mfoumou Mbomba Mbombete Ndelele Yola Gari Gombo Haut-Nyong Gribi Boumba-Et-Ngoko Ngari-singo SUD Yokadouma Dja-Et-Lobo Mboy The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. 10km Printing date:01 Jun 2015 Sources:UNHCR Author:UNHCR - HQ Geneva Feedback:[email protected] Filename:cmr_refugeesites_caf_A3P.
    [Show full text]
  • Tangible Reality?: Challenging the Rigidity of the 1964 Cairo Declaration
    DRAFT Challenging the rigidity of 1964 Cairo declaration – Donaldson Tangible reality?: Challenging the rigidity of the 1964 Cairo declaration (DRAFT PAPER NOT FOR CITATION) ABORNE Conference, Johannesburg, 9‐12 September 2009 John W. Donaldson International Boundaries Research Unit Department of Geography Durham University DRAFT Tangible reality? – Donaldson, ABORNE 2009 1. Boundaries and borders 1.1. The increasing gulf in academic approaches to boundaries and borders has made it more difficult to interlink the two and find areas of common ground where the approaches may be mutually beneficial. Boundaries are distinguished by three characteristics; they are fixed/static, linear and bilateral. The traditional definition of borders identifies them as the geographic areas around the pre‐existent boundary1 which will include the infrastructures of controlling movement from one jurisdiction to another. The linguistic distinction between the terms has long been debated and recent scholars have observed that the two sub‐ disciplines have gradually drifted apart to become what Henk Van Houtum calls “separate subfields.”2 Boundary studies have become more aligned with international legal scholarship than its traditional genus of political geography where border and bordering discourses have become more dominant.3 The two sub‐disciplines may be drifting apart but that has not always been the case. As the African Union Border Programme has set in motion recovery and improved definition of African boundaries by 2012, it may be useful for policy‐makers to recall that boundaries and borders have had a much more complex relationship even during these unique practices of boundary‐making than may be popularly understood. 1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking Forward : U.S.- Africa Relations
    LOOKING FORWARD: U.S.-AFRICA RELATIONS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON AFRICA, GLOBAL HEALTH, GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS, AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 2019 Serial No. 116–19 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( Available: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/, http://docs.house.gov, or http://http://www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 35–615PDF WASHINGTON : 2019 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York, Chairman BRAD SHERMAN, California MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas, Ranking GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York Member ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia STEVE CHABOT, Ohio THEODORE E. DEUTCH, Florida JOE WILSON, South Carolina KAREN BASS, California SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania WILLIAM KEATING, Massachusetts TED S. YOHO, Florida DAVID CICILLINE, Rhode Island ADAM KINZINGER, Illinois AMI BERA, California LEE ZELDIN, New York JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas JIM SENSENBRENNER, Wisconsin DINA TITUS, Nevada ANN WAGNER, Missouri ADRIANO ESPAILLAT, New York BRIAN MAST, Florida TED LIEU, California FRANCIS ROONEY, Florida SUSAN WILD, Pennsylvania BRIAN FITZPATRICK, Pennsylvania DEAN PHILLIPS, Minnesota JOHN CURTIS, Utah ILHAN OMAR, Minnesota KEN BUCK, Colorado COLIN ALLRED, Texas RON WRIGHT, Texas ANDY LEVIN, Michigan GUY RESCHENTHALER, Pennsylvania ABIGAIL SPANBERGER, Virginia TIM BURCHETT, Tennessee CHRISSY HOULAHAN, Pennsylvania GREG PENCE, Indiana TOM
    [Show full text]
  • Phd Thesis Modern Law and Local Tradition in Forest Heritage
    PhD Thesis Modern Law and Local Tradition in Forest Heritage Conservation in Cameroon: The Case of Korup A thesis approved by the Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Process Engineering at the Brandenburg University of Technology in Cottbus in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the award of the academic degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in Environmental Sciences by Master of Arts Terence Onang Egute from Oshie, Momo Division, Northwest Region, Cameroon Supervisor: Prof. Dr. iur. Eike Albrecht Department of Civil and Public Law with References to the Law of Europe and the Environment, BTU Cottbus, Germany Supervisor: Prof. Dr. hab. Konrad Nowacki Department of Environmental Law and Comparative Administrative Law, University of Wroclaw, Poland Day of the oral examination: 26.11.2012 DOKTORARBEIT Modernes Recht und Lokale Traditionen bei der Erhaltung des Walderbes in Kamerun: Eine Fallstudie über Korup Von der Fakultät für Umweltwissenschaften und Verfahrenstechnik der Brandenburgischen Technischen Universität Cottbus genehmigte Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Philosophie (Ph.D.) in Umweltwissenschaften vorgelegt von Master of Arts Terence Onang Egute aus Oshie, Momo Division, Northwest Region, Kamerun Gutachter: Prof. Dr. iur. Eike Albrecht Lehrstuhl Zivil- und Öffentliches Recht mit Bezügen zum Umwelt- und Europarecht der BTU Cottbus, Deutschland Gutachter: Prof. Dr. hab. Konrad Nowacki Lehrstuhl Umweltrecht und Vergleichendes Verwaltungsrecht der Universität Wroclaw, Polen Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 26.11.2012 Modern Law and Local Tradition in Forest Heritage Conservation in Cameroon: The Case of Korup Declaration I hereby declare that this dissertation is the result of my original research carried out at the Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus, Germany within the framework of the doctorate programme Environmental and Resource Management.
    [Show full text]
  • Cameroon Developing Subnational Estimates of Hiv Prevalence and the Number of People
    UNAIDS 2014 | REFERENCE CAMEROON DEVELOPING SUBNATIONAL ESTIMATES OF HIV PREVALENCE AND THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV UNAIDS / JC2665E (English original, September 2014) Copyright © 2014. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). All rights reserved. Publications produced by UNAIDS can be obtained from the UNAIDS Information Production Unit. Reproduction of graphs, charts, maps and partial text is granted for educational, not-for-profit and commercial purposes as long as proper credit is granted to UNAIDS: UNAIDS + year. For photos, credit must appear as: UNAIDS/name of photographer + year. Reproduction permission or translation-related requests—whether for sale or for non-commercial distribution—should be addressed to the Information Production Unit by e-mail at: [email protected]. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNAIDS concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. UNAIDS does not warrant that the information published in this publication is complete and correct and shall not be liable for any damages incurred as a result of its use. METHODOLOGY NOTE Developing subnational estimates of HIV prevalence and the number of people living with HIV from survey data Introduction prevR Significant geographic variation in HIV Applying the prevR method to generate maps incidence and prevalence, as well as of estimates of the number of people living programme implementation, has been with HIV (aged 15–49 and 15 and older) and observed between and within countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Cameroon's Forest Investment Plan
    Cameroon's Forest Investment Plan FOREST INVESTMENT PLAN (CAMEROON) MINISTRY OF Lead MDB Support MDB ENVIRONMENT, PROTECTION OF NATURE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT FINAL REPORT 11 November 2017 1 Cameroon's Forest Investment Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES.................................................................................................................................4 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ...............................................................................................................5 1. NATIONAL CONTEXT AND THE FOREST SECTOR........................................................20 1.1. Country Profile....................................................................................................................20 1.1.1. Geography and Climate...............................................................................................20 1.1.2. Agro-Ecological zones..................................................................................................20 1.1.3. Population.....................................................................................................................23 1.1.4. National Economy........................................................................................................24 1.2. The forest Sector .................................................................................................................25 1.2.1. The forest sector economic and political context ......................................................26 1.2.2. Key Drivers of
    [Show full text]