Presidents of NUSS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Goh Chok Tong V Chee Soon Juan [2003] SGHC 79
Goh Chok Tong v Chee Soon Juan [2003] SGHC 79 Case Number : Suit 1460/2001 Decision Date : 04 April 2003 Tribunal/Court : High Court Coram : MPH Rubin J Counsel Name(s) : Davinder Singh SC, Hri Kumar and Nicolas Tang (Drew & Napier LLC) for the plaintiff/respondent; Defendant/appellant in person Parties : Goh Chok Tong — Chee Soon Juan Civil Procedure – Pleadings – Defence – Particulars of defence of duress not pleaded – Effect on defendant's case Civil Procedure – Summary judgment – Whether to set aside summary judgment and grant defendant leave to defend claim – Whether defendant had real or bona fide defence Contract – Discharge – Breach – Whether intimidation a defence to breach of contract of compromise Contract – Duress – Illegitimate pressure – Whether threat to enforce one's legal rights could amount to duress Tort – Defamation – Defamatory statements – Republication – Words republished by mass media – Whether defendant liable for republication Tort – Defamation – Defamatory statements – Whether defamatory in natural and ordinary meaning or by way of innuendo 1 This was an appeal by Dr Chee Soon Juan to judge-in-chambers from the decision of Senior Assistant Registrar Mr Toh Han Li (‘the SAR’) granting interlocutory judgment with damages (including aggravated damages) to be assessed in a defamation action brought by the respondent, Mr Goh Chok Tong. Mr Goh is, and was at all material times, the Prime Minister of the Republic of Singapore. On 25 October 2001, Mr Goh, as a candidate of the People’s Action Party (‘PAP’), was returned unopposed as a Member of Parliament for Marine Parade Group Representation Constituency (‘GRC’) in the 2001 General Elections. -
Jurong Fishery Port (P
Jurong Fishery Port (p. 55) Jurong Railway (p. 56) Masjid Hasanah (p. 67) SAFTI (p. 51) Fishery Port Road A remaining track can be found at Ulu Pandan Park Connector, 492 Teban Gardens Road 500 Upper Jurong Road Established in 1969 at the former Tanjong Balai, this fishery between Clementi Ave 4 and 6 port handles most of the fish imported into Singapore and is also a marketing distribution centre for seafood. The Jurong Fishery Port and Market are open to public visits. Jurong Hill (p. 61) 1 Jurong Hill Following Singapore’s independence in 1965, the Singapore Opened in 1966, Jurong Railway was another means to Armed Forces Training Institute (SAFTI) was established to transport raw materials and export finished products from the provide formal training for officers to lead its armed forces. industrial estate. Operations ceased in the mid-1990s. Formerly located at Pasir Laba Camp, the institute moved to its current premises in 1995. Jurong’s brickworks industry and dragon kilns (p. 24) Following the resettlement of villagers from Jurong’s 85 Lorong Tawas (Thow Kwang Industry) and 97L Lorong Tawas surrounding islands in the 1960s, Masjid Hasanah was built Science Centre Singapore (p. 65) (Jalan Bahar Clay Studios), both off Jalan Bahar to replace the old suraus (small prayer houses) of the islands. 15 Science Centre Road With community support, the mosque was rebuilt and reopened in 1996. Nanyang University (p. 28) Currently the highest ground in Jurong, this hill provides a 12 Nanyang Drive (Library and Administration Building); vista of Jurong Industrial Estate. In the late 1960s, the hill was Yunnan Garden (Memorial); Jurong West Street 93 (Arch) transformed into a recreational space. -
Health and Medical Research in Singapore Observatory on Health Research Systems
THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as a public CHILD POLICY service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING organization providing objective analysis and effective PUBLIC SAFETY solutions that address the challenges facing the public SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Europe View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation documented briefing series. RAND documented briefings are based on research briefed to a client, sponsor, or targeted au- dience and provide additional information -
Commentary 2011
Commentary: Volume 24, 2015 Singapore @ 50: Reflections and Observations Editor: Associate Professor Victor R Savage Published by The National University of Singapore Society (NUSS) Kent Ridge Guild House 9 Kent Ridge Drive Singapore 119241 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed by Naili Printing Industry MCI (P) 097 / 02 / 2015 COMMENTARY VOLUME 24, 2015 SINGAPORE @ 50: REFLECTIONS AND OBSERVATIONS 1 Contents Tribute Singapore Economy 5 Lee Kuan Yew (1923-2015): 56 - 78 Singapore’s Economic Mentor, Sage and Political Development, 1965-2020: Philosopher Review, Reflection and Victor R Savage Perspective Tan Khee Giap, Editorial Evan Tan Beng Kai and 6 - 14 Singapore@50: Reflections Vincent Kwan Wen Seng and Observations Victor R Savage 79 - 85 Development of Singapore’s Financial Sector Infrastructure Piyush Gupta 15 - 21 Singapore has become a City 86 - 93 The Hub Concept - for Cars, not People Reflections on the Past, Bruno Wildermuth Projections for the Future 22 - 28 An Extraordinary Journey: Joergen Oerstroem Moeller 50 Years of Urban Planning Security & Defence in Singapore Mieko Otsuki 94 - 100 50 Years of Singapore’s Securitisation: Prospects Social Issues and Challenges 29 - 37 Singapore In Transition: Bilveer Singh Staying Together For The External Relations Next 50 - Reviving the 101 - 108 Building on -
Lee Kuan Yew V Chee Soon Juan [2002]
Lee Kuan Yew v Chee Soon Juan [2002] SGHC 122 Case Number : OM 600028/2002, OM 600029/2002 Decision Date : 07 June 2002 Tribunal/Court : High Court Coram : Lee Seiu Kin JC Counsel Name(s) : Chee Soon Juan in person; Jeffrey Chan and Leong Wing Tuck for the A-G chambers; Yang Lih Shyng (Khattar Wong & Partners) for the Law Society; Davinder Singh SC and Hri Kumar (Drew & Napier LLC) for the plaintiffs in the suits Parties : Lee Kuan Yew — Chee Soon Juan Judgment GROUNDS OF DECISION 1 The two Originating Motions before me concern applications by two Queen’s Counsel for ad hoc admission to practise as advocates and solicitors in the High Court. The applicant in O.M. 600028/2002 is Mr. Martin Lee Chu Ming, Q.C. and in O.M. 600029/2002, Mr. William Henric Nicholas, Q.C. They apply to be admitted to represent the defendant, Dr. Chee Soon Juan, in two actions in the High Court, viz. Suit No 1459/2001 in which the plaintiff is Mr. Lee Kuan Yew and Suit No 1460/2001 in which the plaintiff is Mr. Goh Chok Tong. Dr. Chee appeared before me to make the applications on behalf of Mr. Martin Lee and Mr. William Nicholas. 2 The applications are made under s 21 of the Legal Profession Act ("the Act") which provides as follows: (1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Act, the court may, for the purpose of any one case where the court is satisfied that it is of sufficient difficulty and complexity and having regard to the circumstances of the case, admit to practise as an advocate and solicitor any person who - (a) holds Her Majesty`s Patent as Queen`s Counsel; (b) does not ordinarily reside in Singapore or Malaysia but who has come or intends to come to Singapore for the purpose of appearing in the case; and (c) has special qualifications or experience for the purpose of the case. -
Lee Kuan Yew V Chee Soon Juan (No 2)
Lee Kuan Yew v Chee Soon Juan (No 2) [2005] SGHC 2 Case Number : Suit 1459/2001 Decision Date : 06 January 2005 Tribunal/Court : High Court Coram : Kan Ting Chiu J Counsel Name(s) : Davinder Singh SC, Hri Kumar, Nicolas Tang (Drew and Napier LLC) for the plaintiff; The defendant in person Parties : Lee Kuan Yew — Chee Soon Juan Tort – Defamation – Damages – Assessment of damages – Defendant alleging plaintiff mishandling nation's funds – Principles of assessment – Quantification of damages Civil Procedure – Reconvening hearing – Defendant not attending assessment of damages hearing – Defendant applying to reconvene such hearing – Defendant applying to cross-examine plaintiff and plaintiff's counsel in application to reconvene hearing – Factors to consider when deciding whether to grant defendant's applications to reconvene hearing and to cross-examine plaintiff and plaintiff's counsel at such reconvened hearing 6 January 2005 Judgment reserved. Kan Ting Chiu J: 1 This matter came before me for damages to be assessed following a finding that the defendant had defamed the plaintiff. 2 The plaintiff, Mr Lee Kuan Yew, was the Senior Minister of Singapore before he assumed the office of Minister Mentor on 12 August 2004. The defendant, Dr Chee Soon Juan, was and is the Secretary-General of the Singapore Democratic Party. 3 This action arose out of words the defendant said in the course of campaigning in the 2001 Parliamentary General Elections. The subject words 4 On 28 October 2001, the defendant spoke at an election rally at Nee Soon Central. He told his audience: Yesterday, Mr Lee Kuan Yew was at his best. -
Giving Report 2010/2011 Report Giving
Medicine Engineering Public Policy Music Business Law Arts and Social Sciences National University Singapore of GIVING REPORT 2010/2011 GIVING REPORT DEVELOPMENT OFFICE National University of Singapore Shaw Foundation Alumni House 2010/2011 #03-01, 11 Kent Ridge Drive Singapore 119244 t: +65 6516 8000 / 1-800-DEVELOP f: +65 6775 9161 e: [email protected] www.giving.nus.edu.sg PRESIDENT’S STATEMENT Dear alumni and friends, Your support this past year has provided countless opportunities for the National Science University of Singapore (NUS), particularly From music to for the students who are at the heart of our University. For example, approximately medicine, your 1,700 students received bursaries. Around 1,400 of these were partially supported by gift today makes the Annual Giving campaign and about 300 are Named Bursaries. Thank you for Computing a difference to a making this possible. student’s tomorrow Our future is very exciting. NUS University Town will open its doors in the coming months and the Yale-NUS College will follow a few years later. These new President’s Statement........................................... 01 initiatives will allow NUS to continue pursuing its goal of offering students, Thank You For Your Contribution.................... 02 from the entire NUS campus, a broader Education { 02 } education that will challenge them and Research { 06 } position them well for the future. Service { 10 } Design and Environment Through these and other innovations, Annual Giving – NUS is also breaking new ground in Making A Difference Together......................... 14 higher education, both in Singapore and the region. The NUS experience will Strength In Numbers............................................ -
The Case of Singapore
PennGSE Perspectives on Urban Education (http://www.urbanedjournal.org) Home > A New Educational Perspective: The Case of Singapore A NEW EDUCATIONAL PERSPECTIVE: THE CASE OF SINGAPORE Daniel C. Kent Yale-NUS College Keywords: international education, education policy, Singapore Introduction: Education in Singapore Then and Now Lying at the edge of peninsular Malaysia in the heart of Southeast Asia, Singapore is a post-colonial country with a population of 5.5 million individuals known for its tropical climate, technological advancement, and diverse population. The city-state ranks near the top of the world for various metrics on wellbeing, with a high GDP per capita, low unemployment, and high life expectancy in addition to a number of other metrics (Central Intelligence Agency, 2017). The nation’s standing today as the financial capital of Asia and the most developed country of the region would have seemed an impossible goal at the nation’s founding over 50 years ago. The Singaporean government has achieved ambitious goals through a variety of mechanisms, but education has proven to be the single most important investment the government has made in the course of its short history. Policymaking in this sphere has allowed Singapore to achieve some of the highest educational attainment rates in the world. It has become a model of urban education from which other countries and contexts may have valuable lessons to learn. Singapore was founded in 1964 after a forced separation from Malaysia. With close to no natural resources, the government (under the leadership of Lee Kuan Yew) immediately made economic development its top priority, with targeted policies in foreign investment and education, primarily driving growth (Leggett, 2011). -
Title Singapore's Prescription for Successful Control of Transnational
Singapore's Prescription for Successful Control of Title Transnational Emerging Infectious Diseases Author(s) Yoshikawa, Minako Jen Citation Southeast Asian Studies (2012), 1(2): 301-331 Issue Date 2012-08 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/167295 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University Singapore’s Prescription for Successful Control of Transnational Emerging Infectious Diseases* Minako Jen Yoshikawa** Severe acute respiratory syndrome, a previously unknown emerging infectious dis- ease, spread to multiple locations across continents in 2003 without being initially identified as a life-threatening infectious disease. The Republic of Singapore, in Southeast Asia, was one of the countries/areas affected by the global outbreak. With almost no existing procedures on how to deal with an emerging epidemic of such severity and rapid transmission, the country managed to formulate and implement policies to support countermeasures against this infectious disease. The interven- tions by the Singapore government covered of social and economic issues beyond the scope of public health, and promoted the involvement of governmental bodies and the general public. This example set by Singapore has been well recognized by international communities as the employment of successful containment measures. By scrutinizing public health measures deployed by the country, this paper identifies a political will that was embodied in a total governmental approach toward the emerging infectious disease in 2003; analyzes the origin of -
Budget 2010 Debate Round-Up Speech by Minister for Finance, Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam on 4 March 2010
BUDGET 2010 DEBATE ROUND-UP SPEECH BY MINISTER FOR FINANCE, MR THARMAN SHANMUGARATNAM ON 4 MARCH 2010 A. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 2 CHARTING A NEW COURSE ............................................................................................ 2 B. INVESTING IN PRODUCTIVITY .......................................................................... 4 PRODUCTIVITY: A RECURRING PRIORITY ............................................................................ 4 INVESTING IN ENTERPRISE UPGRADING ............................................................................. 8 FOCUS BENEFITS ON GROWTH-SEEKING BUSINESSES ........................................................... 9 PROVIDE BANG FOR THE BUCK FOR SMES ....................................................................... 11 BALANCE BETWEEN BROAD-BASED AND TARGETED MEASURES ............................................. 13 OTHER ISSUES ........................................................................................................... 13 C. INVESTING FOR INCLUSIVE GROWTH ............................................................ 16 RAISING THE INCOMES OF THE LOWER-INCOME GROUPS .................................................... 16 INEQUALITY .............................................................................................................. 21 HOW WE ARE HELPING THE LOWER INCOME GROUP ......................................................... 23 INVESTING IN SKILLS AND EDUCATION -
Names of Chinese People in Singapore
101 Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 7.1 (2011): 101-133 DOI: 10.2478/v10016-011-0005-6 Lee Cher Leng Department of Chinese Studies, National University of Singapore ETHNOGRAPHY OF SINGAPORE CHINESE NAMES: RACE, RELIGION, AND REPRESENTATION Abstract Singapore Chinese is part of the Chinese Diaspora.This research shows how Singapore Chinese names reflect the Chinese naming tradition of surnames and generation names, as well as Straits Chinese influence. The names also reflect the beliefs and religion of Singapore Chinese. More significantly, a change of identity and representation is reflected in the names of earlier settlers and Singapore Chinese today. This paper aims to show the general naming traditions of Chinese in Singapore as well as a change in ideology and trends due to globalization. Keywords Singapore, Chinese, names, identity, beliefs, globalization. 1. Introduction When parents choose a name for a child, the name necessarily reflects their thoughts and aspirations with regards to the child. These thoughts and aspirations are shaped by the historical, social, cultural or spiritual setting of the time and place they are living in whether or not they are aware of them. Thus, the study of names is an important window through which one could view how these parents prefer their children to be perceived by society at large, according to the identities, roles, values, hierarchies or expectations constructed within a social space. Goodenough explains this culturally driven context of names and naming practices: Department of Chinese Studies, National University of Singapore The Shaw Foundation Building, Block AS7, Level 5 5 Arts Link, Singapore 117570 e-mail: [email protected] 102 Lee Cher Leng Ethnography of Singapore Chinese Names: Race, Religion, and Representation Different naming and address customs necessarily select different things about the self for communication and consequent emphasis. -
Conference Book TABLE of CONTENTS
Conference Book TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Welcome Message 3 2. Bioethics Advisory Committee’s 4 20th Anniversary Virtual Public Conference 3. About Bioethics Advisory Committee 6 4. Our History And Timeline 6 5. Programme Overview 7 Day 1: 17 June 2021 Day 2: 18 June 2021 6. Speakers’ Biographies 10 7. Guest-of-Honour: 18 Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat 8. Special Highlights: Fire-side Chat Invited Panellists 20 9. Panel Discussion with Religious Leaders 23 10. Thematic Sessions 25 Session 2: Artificial Intelligence Session 3: Gene Editing Session 4: Assisted Reproduction Technology 11. Award Recipients 30 12. Gallery 36 13. Acknowledgements 38 14. Contact Us 40 Welcome Message On behalf of the Bioethics Advisory Committee (BAC), I warmly welcome you to the BAC’s 20th Anniversary Virtual Public Conference on 17 and 18 June 2021. This year, the BAC celebrates its 20th Anniversary. The public conference provides us with the opportunity to look back on our achievements and contributions to Singapore over 20 years since the BAC’s establishment in 2000. As we commemorate the past accomplishments of the BAC, we must also look forward and prepare for the future. As biomedical sciences continue to develop, novel ethical issues will arise on the horizon, and bioethics continues to play an integral role in protecting the rights and welfare of research participants. It is essential to prepare our future generations to address these new challenges adequately and ensure Singapore continues to practise good and robust science with high ethical standards. Themed ‘Bioethics Future: Empowering Our Next Generation’, this conference aims to help educate and raise the awareness of our future generations on the importance of bioethics and be an interactive platform for us to exchange ideas on the future of bioethics.