DOCSLIB.ORG

Resume David Magney Environmental Consulting Mitchell C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Resume David Magney Environmental Consulting Mitchell C Resume David Magney Environmental Consulting Mitchell C. Provance, Ph.D Senior Botanist, Ethnobotanist EDUCATION: Ph.D. Plant Biology (emphasis in plant taxonomy, biogeography, and ethnobotany), University of California at Riverside, 2006. Dissertation Title: Mesoamerian persimmons. B.S. Botany, University of California at Riverside, 2000. EXPERTISE: Taxonomy of vascular plants; floristics, expecially of southern California and Mexico. Taxonomy, biogeography, and ethnobotany of Mesoamerican Diospyros (Ebenaceae). Taxonomy of the genus Chenopodium (Chenopodiaceae) in the western U.S.A. and Mexico. QUALIFICATIONS Dr. Provance, Senior Botanist at David Magney Environmental Consulting, has over 10 years AND EXPERIENCE: experience in biological studies and environmental consulting. He has extensive experience conducting botanical surveys throughout southern California and Mexico. Dr. Provance is currently a team leader conducting floristic surveys of 62,000 acres of the Tejon Ranch in Kern and Los Angeles Counties. Dr. Provance has mapped and described natural vegetation, assessing project-related impacts to natural habitats, and mapped the distributions and occurrences of special-status plant species. He has conducted surveys in Kern, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties for a variety of projects. Prior to joining DMEC, Dr. Provance has worked as a consultant to a variety of consulting firms, including: CH2Mhill, Natural Resource Consultants, Dudek and Associates, Inc., Ken Halama, Inc., and Garcia and Associates, Inc. He has also conducted field surveys for UC Riverside Herbarium and the Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden. He is currently a Museum Scientist with the University of California Riverside Botanic Garden and an Associate in the Agricultural Experiment Station at UCR Herbarium. PROFESSIONAL California Botanical Society AFFILIATIONS: Botanical Research Institute of Texas Southern California Botanists University of California, Riverside, Herbarium Research Associate PUBLICATIONS: Provance, M.C., and A.C. Sanders. 2009. (in review). An Overview of the Diospyros campechiana Complex (Ebenaceae) and Description of Three New Species. J. Bot. Res. Inst. of Texas Provance, M.C. In press. Ebenaceae, In: Listado Floristico de Oaxaca. Abisaí García- Mendoza Botanical Garden, Institute of Biology, UNAM. and Dr Gerald Salazar Chávez National Herbario, Institute of Biology, UNAM. Mexico Sanders, A.C. and M.C. Provance. (in review). A Botanical Survey of Rancho El Jabalí, Colima/Jalisco, Mexico. Biodiversity of Colima (Biodiversidad de Colima). Provance, M.C., I. Garcia-Ruiz, & A.C. Sanders. 2008. The Diospyros salicifolia Complex (Ebenaceae) in Mesoamerica. J. Bot. Res. Inst. of Texas 2:1,009-1,100 Provance, M.C. 2006. Mesoamerican Persimmons. Dissertation. University of California, Riverside Provance, M.C., & A.C. Sanders. 2006. More American Black Zapotes: New Diospyros (Ebenaceae) for Mexico and Central America. Sida 22:277-304 Provance, M.C. & A.C. Sanders. 2005. Diospyros torresii (Ebenaceae): A New Black Zapote From Tropical Mexico. Sida 21:2,045–2,050 Cahill, J.P., & M.C. Provance. 2002. Genetics of Qualitative Traits in Domesticated Chia (Salvia hispanica L.). The Journal of Heredity 93:52–55 Provance, M.C., A.C. Sanders, V. Soza, S. Boyd, D. Bramlet, & A.L. Wolf. 2000. Noteworthy Collections, California. Ambrosia pumilla, Dicoria canescens, Erodium malacoides, Koeleria phleoides, Monardella pringlei, Nama stenocarpum, Quercus palmeri. Madroño 47:139-141 Soza, V., M.C. Provance, A.C. Sanders, & S. Boyd. 2000. Noteworthy Collections, California. Brickellia knappiana, Brickellia multiflora, (etc.). Madroño 47:141-142 Y:\DMEC\Resumes\DMECStaff\current resumes\Provance-Mitchell-resume.doc Page 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dedicated to the Preservation of the California Native Flora
    DEDICATED TO THE PRESERVATION OF THE CALIFORNIA NATIVE FLORA NEWSLETTER Vol. 2, No. 3 June 1983 There wi 11 be no meetings in July and August. In lieu of field trips during the sumner, scouting trips to check on rare plant distribution will take place. Those who wi sh to become in- volved should contact Vince Yoder, -m 876-4275. President's message: Although we appear to be a little less active during the sumner, we should remember the need for our vigilance must continue unabated. And this can be expressed effectively in letter writing. The extent of the government's retreat from its duties to protect the lands from environmental destruction is appalling. The collective voice of CNPS members can be considerable when letters flood to legislators and officials at all levels of government. - The voiceof the people is still strong, but wemust keep shouting tobe heard. So take up pen and paper and keep the letters flowing, even in the sumne r . ---Vi nce Yoder FIELD TRIP REPORT The field trip of May 28-30 was an enjoyable experience for those who showed up. It was like another world as we had the Eureka Dunes all to ourselves, and only a helicopter broke the silence in the Last Chance Mountains. The small number in the group allowed flexibility for visit- ing rare sites. Among the interesting plants observed were: Astraqalus lentiqinosus var. micans (Eureka milk-vetch) Astragalus panamintensis (Cliff milk-vetch) Buddleia utahensi s (Utah buddleja) Cercocarpus intricatus (Little-leaf mahogany) Chaetadelpha wheeleri (Dune broom) Chamaesyce ocellata, formerly Euphorbia ocellata (Valley spurge) Cleome sparsifolia (Naked cleome) Cymopterus gilmanii (Gilman cymopterus) Dedeckera eurekensis (Dedeckera or July gold) Dicoria canescens ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP
    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report
    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills D210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project: Rare Plant Survey Report Page Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project Location and Description .....................................................................................2 Setting ................................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 5 Topography and Soils ......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes
    National Plant Data Team August 2012 Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes and the Klamath Tribe of Oregon in the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum of Anthropology Collections, University of California, Berkeley August 2012 Cover photos: Left: Maidu woman harvesting tarweed seeds. Courtesy, The Field Museum, CSA1835 Right: Thick patch of elegant madia (Madia elegans) in a blue oak woodland in the Sierra foothills The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its pro- grams and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sex- ual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Acknowledgments This report was authored by M. Kat Anderson, ethnoecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and Jim Effenberger, Don Joley, and Deborah J. Lionakis Meyer, senior seed bota- nists, California Department of Food and Agriculture Plant Pest Diagnostics Center. Special thanks to the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum staff, especially Joan Knudsen, Natasha Johnson, Ira Jacknis, and Thusa Chu for approving the project, helping to locate catalogue cards, and lending us seed samples from their collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Vegetation of the Mohawk Dunes, Arizona, Felger, Richard Stephen
    FLORA AND VEGETATION OF THE MOHAWK DUNES, ARIZONA Richard Stephen Felger Dale Scott Turner Michael F. Wilson Drylands Institute The Nature Conservancy Drylands Institute 2509 North Campbell, #405 1510 E. Fort Lowell 2509 North Campbell, #405 Tucson, AZ 85719, U.S.A. Tucson, AZ 85719, U.S.A. Tucson, AZ 85719, U.S.A. [email protected] ABSTRACT One-hundred twenty-two species of seed plants, representing 95 genera and 35 families are docu- mented for the 7,700 ha Mohawk Dune Field and its immediate surroundings, located in Yuma County, Arizona, USA. Three major habitats were studied: dunes, adjacent sand flats, and playa. The dunes (including interdune swales) support 78 species, of which 13 do not occur on the adjacent non-dune habitats. The adjacent non-dune habitats (sand flats and playa) support 109 species, of which 43 were not found on the dunes. The total flora has 81 annual species, or 66% of the flora. The dune flora has 63 annual (ephemeral) species, or 81% of the flora—one of the highest percentages of annuals among any regional flora. Of these dune annuals, 53 species (84%) develop during the cool season. No plant taxon is endemic to the Mohawk region. There are 8 dune, or sand adapted, endemics— Cryptantha ganderi, Dimorphocarpa pinnatifida, Dicoria canescens, Ditaxis serrata, Pleuraphis rigida, Psorothamnus emoryi, Stephanomeria schottii, Tiquilia plicata—all of which are found on nearby dune systems. Two of them (C. ganderi and S. schottii) are of limited distribution, especially in the USA, and have G2 Global Heritage Status Rank. There are four non-native species in the dune flora (Brassica tournefortii, Mollugo cerviana, Sonchus asper, Schismus arabicus), but only Brassica and Schismus seem to pose serious threats to the dune ecosystem at this time.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants—Desert Studies Center
    DSC Plant List Page 1 of 7 Plants—Desert Studies Center + - Common names from Edmund Jaeger's Desert Wild Flowers * - Common names from LeRoy Abram's Illustrated Flora of the Pacific States ** Introduced Species EPHEDRALES EPHEDRACEAE EPHEDRA FAMILY Ephedra nevedensis *Nevada Ephedra, + Nevada Joint Fir DICOTYLEDONES AIZOACEAE CARPET-WEED FAMILY Sesuvium verrucosum *Western Sea-purslane Trianthema portulacastrum *Horse-purslane, +Lowland Purslane AMARANTHACEAE AMARANTH FAMILY Tidestromia oblongifolia *Arizona Honey-sweet, +Honey-sweet APOCYNACEAE DOGBANE FAMILY **Nerium oleander +Oleander ASCLEPIADACEAE MILKWEED FAMILY Asclepias erosa +Desert Milkweed Sarcostemma cynanchoides hartwegii *Climbing-milkweed,Townula, +PurpleClimbing-milkweed ASTERACEAE SUNFLOWER FAMILY Ambrosia dumosa *White Bur-sage, +Burrobush Amphipappus fremontii spinosus *Chaffbush, +Eytelia Aster subulatus ligulatus *Slim Aster Baileya pauciradiata *Colorado Desert-marigold, +Lax-flower Top of Page • Biology Index Page • DSC Home Page Baileya pleniradiata *+Woolly-marigold Bebbia juncea asper *+Sweetbush Brickellia incana *Woolly Brickellia, Brickelbush, +Woolly Brickellia Chaenactis carphoclinia carphoclinia *+Pebble-pincushion Chaenactis fremontii *+Fremont-pincushion Chaenactis stevioides *Broad-flowered Chaenactis +Esteve-pincushion **Chamomilla suaveolens *Pineapple Weed Dicoria canescens *+Desert Dicoria Encelia farinosa *+Brittlebush, Incienso file://C:\Documents and Settings\Owner.YOUR -780C524461\My Documents\DSC\biology\plants ... 8/18/2007 DSC Plant List Page
    [Show full text]
  • Classification and Description of World Formation Types
    United States Department of Agriculture Classification and Description of World Formation Types Don Faber-Langendoen, Todd Keeler-Wolf, Del Meidinger, Carmen Josse, Alan Weakley, David Tart, Gonzalo Navarro, Bruce Hoagland, Serguei Ponomarenko, Gene Fults, Eileen Helmer Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Service Research Station Report RMRS-GTR-346 August 2016 Faber-Langendoen, D.; Keeler-Wolf, T.; Meidinger, D.; Josse, C.; Weakley, A.; Tart, D.; Navarro, G.; Hoagland, B.; Ponomarenko, S.; Fults, G.; Helmer, E. 2016. Classification and description of world formation types. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-346. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 222 p. Abstract An ecological vegetation classification approach has been developed in which a combi- nation of vegetation attributes (physiognomy, structure, and floristics) and their response to ecological and biogeographic factors are used as the basis for classifying vegetation types. This approach can help support international, national, and subnational classifica- tion efforts. The classification structure was largely developed by the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group (HRWG), which contained members from across the Americas. The HRWG was authorized by the U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) to devel- op a revised global vegetation classification to replace the earlier versions of the structure that guided the U.S. National Vegetation Classification and International Vegetation Classification, which formerly relied on the UNESCO (1973) global classification (see FGDC 1997; Grossman and others 1998). This document summarizes the develop- ment of the upper formation levels. We first describe the history of the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group and discuss the three main parameters that guide the clas- sification—it focuses on vegetated parts of the globe, on existing vegetation, and includes (but distinguishes) both cultural and natural vegetation for which parallel hierarchies are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenix Four River Flora
    The Phoenix Four Rivers Flora, Maricopa County, Arizona by Darin Jenke A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Approved April 2011 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Kathleen B. Pigg, Co-Chair Leslie R. Landrum, Co-Chair Elizabeth Makings ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY May 2011 ABSTRACT The Phoenix Four Rivers Flora is an inventory of all the vascular plants growing along the Salt, Gila, New and Agua Fria Rivers, and their tributaries in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area during the years of the study (2009-2011). This floristic inventory documents the plant species and habitats that exist currently in the project area, which has changed dramatically from previous times. The data gathered by the flora project thus not only documents how the current flora has been altered by urbanization, but also will provide a baseline for future ecological studies. The Phoenix Metropolitan Area is a large urbanized region in the Sonoran Desert of Central Arizona, and its rivers are important for the region for many uses including flood control, waste water management, recreation, and gravel mining. The flora of the rivers and tributaries within the project area is extremely diverse; the heterogeneity of the systems being caused by urbanization, stream modification for flood control, gravel mining, and escaped exotic species. Hydrological changes include increased runoff in some areas because of impermeable surfaces (e.g. paved streets) and decreased runoff in other areas due to flood retention basins. The landscaping trade has introduced exotic plant species that have escaped into urban washes and riparian areas. Many of these have established with native species to form novel plant associations.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Phase II Report
    Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Phase II Report By Dr. Terri Hildebrand Southern Utah University, Cedar City, UT and Dr. Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting, Kanab, UT Colorado Plateau Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Agreement # H1200-09-0005 1 May 2012 Prepared for Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Southern Utah University National Park Service Mojave Network TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Introduction . 4 Study Area . 6 History and Setting . 6 Geology and Associated Ecoregions . 6 Soils and Climate . 7 Vegetation . 10 Previous Botanical Studies . 11 Methods . 17 Results . 21 Discussion . 28 Conclusions . 32 Acknowledgments . 33 Literature Cited . 34 Figures Figure 1. Location of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 5 Figure 2. Ecoregions and 2010-2011 collection sites in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 8 Figure 3. Soil types and 2010-2011 collection sites in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 9 Figure 4. Increase in the number of plant taxa confirmed as present in Grand Canyon- Parashant National Monument by decade, 1900-2011 . 13 Figure 5. Southern Utah University students enrolled in the 2010 Plant Anatomy and Diversity course that collected during the 30 August 2010 experiential learning event . 18 Figure 6. 2010-2011 collection sites and transportation routes in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 22 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Tables Table 1. Chronology of plant-collecting efforts at Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument . 14 Table 2. Data fields in the annotated checklist of the flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument (Appendices A, B, C, and D) .
    [Show full text]
  • Plants of Havasu National Wildlife Refuge
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Plants of Havasu National Wildlife Refuge The Havasu NWR plant list was developed by volunteer Baccharis salicifolia P S N John Hohstadt. As of October 2012, 216 plants have been mulefat documented at the refuge. Baccharis brachyphylla P S N Legend shortleaf baccharis *Occurance (O) *Growth Form (GF) *Exotic (E) Bebbia juncea var. aspera P S N A=Annual G=Grass Y=Yes sweetbush P=Perennial F=Forb N=No Calycoseris wrightii A F N B=Biennial S=Shrub T=Tree white tackstem Calycoseris parryi A F N Family yellow tackstem Scientific Name O* GF* E* Chaenactis carphoclinia A F N Common Name pebble pincushion Agavaceae—Lilies Family Chaenactis fremontii A F N Androstephium breviflorum P F N pincushion flower pink funnel lily Conyza canadensis A F N Hesperocallis undulata P F N Canadian horseweed desert lily Chrysothamnus Spp. P S N Aizoaceae—Fig-marigold Family rabbitbrush Sesuvium sessile A F N Encelia frutescens P S N western seapurslane button brittlebrush Encelia farinosa P S N Aizoaceae—Fig-marigold Family brittlebrush Trianthema portulacastrum A F N Dicoria canescens A F N desert horsepurslane desert twinbugs Amaranthaceae—Amaranth Family Antheropeas wallacei A F N Amaranthus retroflexus A F N woolly easterbonnets redroot amaranth Antheropeas lanosum A F N Tidestromia oblongifolia P F N white easterbonnets Arizona honeysweet Ambrosia dumosa P S N burrobush Apiaceae—Carrot Family Ambrosia eriocentra P S N Bowlesia incana P F N woolly fruit bur ragweed hoary bowlesia Geraea canescens A F N Hydrocotyle verticillata P F N hairy desertsunflower whorled marshpennywort Gnaphalium spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification and Description of World Formation Types
    CLASSIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION OF WORLD FORMATION TYPES PART II. DESCRIPTION OF WORLD FORMATIONS (v 2.0) Hierarchy Revisions Working Group (Federal Geographic Data Committee) 2012 Don Faber-Langendoen, Todd Keeler-Wolf, Del Meidinger, Carmen Josse, Alan Weakley, Dave Tart, Gonzalo Navarro, Bruce Hoagland, Serguei Ponomarenko, Jean-Pierre Saucier, Gene Fults, Eileen Helmer This document is being developed for the U.S. National Vegetation Classification, the International Vegetation Classification, and other national and international vegetation classifications. July 18, 2012 This report was produced by NVC partners (NatureServe, Ecological Society of America, U.S. federal agencies) through the Federal Geographic Data Committee. Printed from NatureServe Biotics on 24 Jul 2012 Citation: Faber-Langendoen, D., T. Keeler-Wolf, D. Meidinger, C. Josse, A. Weakley, D. Tart, G. Navarro, B. Hoagland, S. Ponomarenko, J.-P. Saucier, G. Fults, E. Helmer. 2012. Classification and description of world formation types. Part I (Introduction) and Part II (Description of formation types, v2.0). Hierarchy Revisions Working Group, Federal Geographic Data Committee, FGDC Secretariat, U.S. Geological Survey. Reston, VA, and NatureServe, Arlington, VA. i Classification and Description of World Formation Types. Part II: Formation Descriptions, v2.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The work produced here was supported by the U.S. National Vegetation Classification partnership between U.S. federal agencies, the Ecological Society of America, and NatureServe staff, working through the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Vegetation Subcommittee. FGDC sponsored the mandate of the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group, which included incorporating international expertise into the process. For that reason, this product represents a collaboration of national and international vegetation ecologists.
    [Show full text]
  • FERNS and FERN ALLIES Dittmer, H.J., E.F
    FERNS AND FERN ALLIES Dittmer, H.J., E.F. Castetter, & O.M. Clark. 1954. The ferns and fern allies of New Mexico. Univ. New Mexico Publ. Biol. No. 6. Family ASPLENIACEAE [1/5/5] Asplenium spleenwort Bennert, W. & G. Fischer. 1993. Biosystematics and evolution of the Asplenium trichomanes complex. Webbia 48:743-760. Wagner, W.H. Jr., R.C. Moran, C.R. Werth. 1993. Aspleniaceae, pp. 228-245. IN: Flora of North America, vol.2. Oxford Univ. Press. palmeri Maxon [M&H; Wagner & Moran 1993] Palmer’s spleenwort platyneuron (Linnaeus) Britton, Sterns, & Poggenburg [M&H; Wagner & Moran 1993] ebony spleenwort resiliens Kunze [M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] black-stem spleenwort septentrionale (Linnaeus) Hoffmann [M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] forked spleenwort trichomanes Linnaeus [Bennert & Fischer 1993; M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] maidenhair spleenwort Family AZOLLACEAE [1/1/1] Azolla mosquito-fern Lumpkin, T.A. 1993. Azollaceae, pp. 338-342. IN: Flora of North America, vol. 2. Oxford Univ. Press. caroliniana Willdenow : Reports in W&S apparently belong to Azolla mexicana Presl, though Azolla caroliniana is known adjacent to NM near the Texas State line [Lumpkin 1993]. mexicana Schlechtendal & Chamisso ex K. Presl [Lumpkin 1993; M&H] Mexican mosquito-fern Family DENNSTAEDTIACEAE [1/1/1] Pteridium bracken-fern Jacobs, C.A. & J.H. Peck. Pteridium, pp. 201-203. IN: Flora of North America, vol. 2. Oxford Univ. Press. aquilinum (Linnaeus) Kuhn var. pubescens Underwood [Jacobs & Peck 1993; M&H; W&S] bracken-fern Family DRYOPTERIDACEAE [6/13/13] Athyrium lady-fern Kato, M. 1993. Athyrium, pp.
    [Show full text]