DOCSLIB.ORG

Major Office Specialty (Area 280) 2015 Revaluation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Major Office Specialty (Area 280) 2015 Revaluation Major Office Specialty (Area 280) 2015 Revaluation Department of Assessments Commercial Appraisal Office Specialty 280- 20 DENNY REGRADE - LAKE UNION - FREMONT 280- 10 SEATTLE CBD 280- 40 WATERFRONT - PILL HILL 280- 30 PIONEER SQUARE - SOUTH SEATTLE 280- 50 BELLEVUE - EASTSIDE 20 40 10 30 50 280- 60 NORTH-EAST-SOUTH 280- 60 NORTH-EAST-SOUTHC COOUNNTYTY The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intended for use as a survey product. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. King County Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County. Dept. of Assessments C:\Data\data\Commercial\Commercial_Areas\Specialtyedits.mxd King County Department of Assessments King County Administration Bldg. Lloyd Hara 500 Fourth Avenue, ADM-AS-0708 Seattle, WA 98104-2384 Assessor (206) 296-5195 FAX (206) 296-0595 Email: [email protected] As we start preparations for the 2015 property assessments, it is helpful to remember that the mission and work of the Assessor’s Office sets the foundation for efficient and effective government and is vital to ensure adequate funding for services in our communities. Maintaining the public’s confidence in our property tax system requires that we build on a track record of fairness, equity, and uniformity in property assessments. Though we face ongoing economic challenges, I challenge each of us to seek out strategies for continuous improvement in our business processes. Please follow these standards as you perform your tasks. Use all appropriate mass appraisal techniques as stated in Washington State Laws, Washington State Administrative Codes, Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), and accepted International Association of Assessing Officers (IAAO) standards and practices. Work with your supervisor on the development of the annual valuation plan and develop the scope of work for your portion of appraisal work assigned, including physical inspections and statistical updates of properties; Where applicable, validate correctness of physical characteristics and sales of all vacant and improved properties. Appraise land as if vacant and available for development to its highest and best use. The improvements are to be valued at their contribution to the total in compliance with applicable laws, codes and DOR guidelines. The Jurisdictional Exception is applied in cases where Federal, State or local laws or regulations preclude compliance with USPAP; Develop and validate valuation models as delineated by IAAO standards: Standard on Mass Appraisal of Real Property and Standard on Ratio Studies. Apply models uniformly to sold and unsold properties, so that ratio statistics can be accurately inferred to the entire population. Prepare written reports in compliance with USPAP Standard 6 for Mass Appraisals. The intended users of your appraisals and the written reports include the public, Assessor, the Boards of Equalization and Tax Appeals, and potentially other governmental jurisdictions. The intended use of the appraisals and the written reports is the administration of ad valorem property taxation. Lloyd Hara King County Assessor Department of Assessments Accounting Division Lloyd Hara 500 Fourth Avenue, ADM-AS-0740 Seattle, WA 98104-2384 Assessor (206) 205-0444 FAX (206) 296-0106 Email: [email protected] http://www.kingcounty.gov/assessor/ Dear Property Owners: Property assessments for the 2015 assessment year are being completed by my staff throughout the year and change of value notices are being mailed as neighborhoods are completed. We value property at fee simple, reflecting property at its highest and best use and following the requirement of RCW 84.40.030 to appraise property at true and fair value. We have worked hard to implement your suggestions to place more information in an e-Environment to meet your needs for timely and accurate information. The following report summarizes the results of the 2015 assessment for this area. (See map within report). It is meant to provide you with helpful background information about the process used and basis for property assessments in your area. Fair and uniform assessments set the foundation for effective government and I am pleased that we are able to make continuous and ongoing improvements to serve you. Please feel welcome to call my staff if you have questions about the property assessment process and how it relates to your property. Sincerely, Lloyd Hara Assessor Executive Summary Report Appraisal Date 1/01/15 - 2015 Assessment Year – 2016 Tax Roll Year Specialty Name: Major Office Buildings Physical Inspection: Area 280-50 Bellevue/Eastside was physically inspected. This area included 52 major office properties, or approximately 19.5% of the population. These properties were inspected in 2014 prior to the posting of the office values. Sales - Improved Analysis Summary: Number of Sales: 55 market transactions in 2012, 2013, 2014 Range of Sale Dates: 1/1/2012 to 12/19/2014 Sales--Ratio Study Summary Mean Assessed Value Mean Sale Price Ratio COD* 2014 Value $99,835,000 $124,869,600 80.00% 12.83% 2015 Value $108,508,800 $124,869,600 89.60% 12.06% Abs. Change $8,673,800 9.60% -0.77% % Change 8.69% 12.00% -6.00% *CODis a measure ofuniformity, the lower the numberthe betterthe uniformity Sales used in Analysis: All improved sales that were verified as market sales and did not have major characteristic changes, or have been segregated or merged between the date of sale and the date of appraisal, were included in the ratio analysis. The above ratio study results for office sales in the Major Office Specialty 280 (institutional grade office buildings with a rentable area of 100,000 square feet or more) is based on a sales sample that is heavily weighted with sales of well-leased or well-located lower risk properties in the Downtown Seattle sub-markets and the Bellevue CBD. Consequently, in this instance, it may not be an entirely reliable tool for measuring the revaluation results of the overall specialty that includes properties with higher than market vacancy or less dynamic suburban locations (i.e. South King County) where values lagged behind the rest of the county. In addition, sales in the sample typically represent the Leased Fee interest while the Assessor is tasked with valuing the Fee Simple interest based on market parameters as of the valuation date. Therefore sales with older leases that are above or below current market rates do not reflect the interest the Assessor is valuing. Also in the current expansion cycle of the office market, buyers continue to purchase properties with expectations of higher future net operating incomes (NOI) from higher lease rates with fewer concessions. These sales tend to reflect higher values than the Assessor’s value by the income approach using current market parameters. Area 280 Valuation for 1/1/2015 2015 Area 280 Report 2 Total Population – Parcel Summary Data: Number of Improved Parcels in the Ratio Study Population: 267 (This figure does not include properties currently under construction) Total Population - Parcel Summary Data Land Improvements Total 2014 Value $2,912,019,500 $12,783,597,000 $15,695,616,500 2015 Value $3,095,224,800 $14,119,917,570 $17,215,142,370 % Change 6.29% 10.45% 9.68% Conclusion and Recommendation: While there were a healthy number of Major Office sales in King County during 2014, transaction volume declined versus 2013, the second year in a row, despite substantial investor interest in the local market. There are still not sufficient sales in all market segments to rely solely on the Sales Comparison Approach in the 2015 revalue. The Income Approach is relied on in the final reconciliation of value because it allows greater equalization and uniformity of values for the various stratifications of office buildings in the different submarkets. In addition, sufficient market income data was available to perform this analysis. The Seattle and Eastside office markets continue to remain near the top of national investors’ interest. As of year-end 2014, it was estimated that there was over 3.7 million square feet of office space under construction in the Downtown Seattle market with an additional 1.7 million square feet of office space under construction on the Eastside. This substantial amount of new supply is in the pipeline is in response to tight vacancy rates throughout the county and continued growth in rental rates. In addition, Amazon’s continued expansion accounts for a significant portion of the space currently under construction. The regional office market continues its growth, with nearly 2.4 million square feet of net absorption in 2014, well above the 20-year average of 1.5 million square feet per year.1 Office Market Summary Statistics Market Total Vacancy Class A Avg. Rent 2014 Net Size (SF) Vacancy % Change Asking Rate* Change Absorption (SF) Downtown Seattle 43,863,489 12.4% -11% $36.17 8% 1,259,544 Seattle Close-In 5,311,348 17.6% -3% $29.76 12% 130,636 Southend 10,082,724 19.7% -5% $21.96 0% 98,358 Bellevue CBD 7,911,531 9.3% -5% $39.16 4% 21,844 Eastside 29,984,404 11.0% -23% $31.61 4% 950,886 Source:4th Qtr 2014 CBREOffice MarketView *Full Service Vacancy rates declined in all of the King County submarkets. The Eastside market experienced the sharpest declines in vacancy, followed by the downtown Seattle submarket.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Seattle Branch 1949-50
    Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Seattle Branch 1949-50 1015 Second Avenue 093900-0520 see below C. D. BOREN AND A. A. DENNY 12 2, 3, 6, 7 LOTS 2, 3, 6 AND 7, BLOCK 12, TOWN OF SEATTLE, AS LAID OUT ON THE CLAIMS OF C. D. BOREN AND A. A. DENNY (COMMONLY KNOWN AS BOREN & DENNY’S ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE) ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 27, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 12 FEET THEREOF CONDEMNED IN DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 7097 FOR SECOND AVENUE, AS PROVIDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 1107 OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE. 1015 Second Avenue LLC vacant c/o Martin Selig Real Estate, Attention Pete Parker, 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 1800, Seattle, WA 98104-1046. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Bank Naramore, Bain, Brady, and Johanson (William J. Bain, project principal) Engineer: W. H. Witt Company (George Runciman, project engineer) Kuney Johnson Company Pete Parker c/o Martin Selig Real Estate, Attention Pete Parker, 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 1800, Seattle, WA 98104-1046. (206) 467-7600. October 2015 Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Seattle Branch Bank Landmark Nomination Report 1015 Second Avenue, Seattle October 2015 Prepared by: The Johnson Partnership 1212 NE 65th Street Seattle, WA 98115-6724 206-523-1618, www.tjp.us Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Seattle Branch Landmark Nomination Report October 2015, page i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 City of Seattle Landmark Nomination Process ...................................................................... 2 1.3 Methodology .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • August 26, 2005
    LPB 150/16 REPORT ON DESIGNATION Name and Address of Property: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Seattle Branch 1015 Second Avenue Legal Description: LOTS 2, 3, 6 AND 7, BLOCK 12, TOWN OF SEATTLE, AS LAID OUT ON THE CLAIMS OF C.D. BOREN AND A. A. DENNY (COMMONLY KNOWN AS BOREN & DENNY’S ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE) ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF PLATS, PAGE 27, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 12 FEET THEREOF CONDEMNED IN DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 7097 FOR SECOND AVENUE, AS PROVIDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 1107 OF THE CITY OF SEATTLE. At the public meeting held on March 2, 2016 the City of Seattle's Landmarks Preservation Board voted to approve designation of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Seattle Branch at 1015 Second Avenue as a Seattle Landmark based upon satisfaction of the following standard for designation of SMC 25.12.350: C. It is associated in a significant way with a significant aspect of the cultural, political, or economic heritage of the community, City, state or nation; and D. It embodies the distinctive visible characteristics of an architectural style, or period, or a method of construction; and E. It is an outstanding work of a designer or builder; and F. Because of its prominence of spatial location, contrasts of siting, age, or scale, it is an easily identifiable visual feature of its neighborhood or the city and contributes to the distinctive quality or identity of such neighborhood or the City. DESCRIPTION The former Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Seattle Branch, is located in Seattle’s Central Business District on the western side of the Second Avenue, between Spring and Madison Streets.
    [Show full text]
  • 50The 50 Largest U.S. Seniors Housing Real Estate Owners and Operators
    2020 ASHA The 50 largest U.S. 50seniors housing real estate owners and operators The Hacienda at the River in Tucson, Arizona, operated by Watermark Retirement Communities. Special supplement to n Seniors Housing Business n Heartland Real Estate Business n Northeast Real Estate Business An exclusive n Southeast Real Estate Business report from the n Texas Real Estate Business American Seniors n Western Real Estate Business Housing Association Excellence. Sustained. Strong relationships with true industry leaders are more vital than ever in these unprecedented times. For more than 20 years, Ventas has been a proud partner and investor supporting best-in-class senior living operators and providers. We continue to be inspired by their tireless work in helping to keep seniors safe and well. As one of the world’s premier capital providers, Ventas remains deeply committed to the success of our shareholders and business partners, and to the individuals and families they serve. ventasreit.com SENIOR HOUSING | MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS | RESEARCH & INNOVATION HEALTH SYSTEMS | POST ACUTE CARE TRUSTED SENIORS HOUSING ADVISORS FOR ALL YOUR Excellence. INVESTMENT NEEDS Sustained. Our nationally-recognized platform has expertise Strong relationships with true industry leaders are more vital in projects of all sizes and scopes than ever in these unprecedented times. For more than 20 years, Ventas has been a proud partner and investor supporting best-in-class senior living operators and providers. We continue to be inspired by their tireless work in helping to keep seniors safe and well. As one of the world’s premier capital providers, Ventas remains deeply committed to the success of our shareholders and business partners, and to the individuals and families they serve.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the Alignment of Incentives, Control, and Economics in Development Agreements Between Private Developers and Mission-Driven Institutions
    Analyzing the Alignment of Incentives, Control, and Economics in Development Agreements between Private Developers and Mission-Driven Institutions by F. Samuel Reiche B.A. Economics, 2007 Trinity College Submitted to the Center for Real Estate in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 2013 ©2013 F. Samuel Reiche All rights reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author ___________________________________________________________ Center for Real Estate August 1, 2013 Certified by_____________________________________________________________________ Peter Roth Lecturer, Center for Real Estate Thesis Supervisor Accepted by____________________________________________________________________ David Geltner Chair, MSRED Committee, Interdepartmental Degree Program in Real Estate Development 2 Analyzing the Alignment of Incentives, Control, and Economics in Development Agreements between Private Developers and Mission-Driven Institutions by F. Samuel Reiche Submitted to the Center for Real Estate on August 1, 2013 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development ABSTRACT This thesis examines and analyzes the alignment of incentives, project control, and economics in development agreements between
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Basin Effects Using M9 and Recent Research for Tall Building Design in Seattle
    Estimating Basin Effects Using M9 and Recent Research for Tall Building Design in Seattle COSMOS Technical Session Susan Chang, Ph.D., P.E. I November 16, 2018 1 Seattle Basin Data courtesy of Richard Blakely 2 Tall Buildings in Seattle (100+ m, 328+ ft) Columbia Center Rainier Square Tower 1984, 933 ft 2020, 850 ft Russell Investments Center F5 Tower 2006, 598 ft 2017, 660 ft 1201 3rd Avenue 1988, 772 ft Smith Tower 1914, 462 ft Background Source: www.skyscrapercenter.com/city/seattle 31 buildings 31 buildings Figure from Doug Lindquist, Hart Crowser 3 March 4, 2013 Workshop Chang, S.W., Frankel., A.D., and Weaver, C.S., 2014, RePort on WorkshoP to IncorPorate Basin ResPonse in the Design of Tall Buildings in the Puget Sound Region, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey OPen-File RePort 20- 14-1196, 28 P., httPs://Pubs.usgs.gov/of/2014/1196/ • Basin amPlification factors from crustal ground motion models (amplification factors a function of Z2.5 and Z1.0) • ApPlied to MCER from PSHA for all EQ source tyPes Photo by Doug Lindquist, Hart Crowser 4 Recent Research Effect of DeeP Basins on Structural CollaPse During Large Subduction Earthquakes By Marafi, Eberhard, Berman, Wirth, and Frankel, Earthquake SPectra, August 2017 • Basin amPlification factors for sites with Z2.5 > 3 km Marafi et al. (2017) 5 Recent Research Observed amPlification of sPectral resPonse values for stiff sites in Seattle Basin referenced to Seward Park station – thin soil over firm rock 2003 under OlymPics, M4.8 outside of basin 2001 near SatsoP, M5.0 6 Recent Research Broadband Synthetic Seismograms for Magnitude 9 Earthquakes on the Cascadia Megathrust Based on 3D Simulations and Stochastic Synthetics (Part 1): Methodology and Overall Results By Frankel, Wirth, Marafi, Vidale, and StePhenson, submitted to BSSA January 2018, comPleted USGS internal review 7 USGS/SDCI March 22, 2018 Workshop Attendees Peer reviewers Geotechnical Consultants • C.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Yash Talwar, Nour El-Din Ayad, Garvit Dhingra Business Plan NLC 2018
    Creating space for business and innovation Yash Talwar, Nour El-Din Ayad, Garvit Dhingra Business Plan NLC 2018 Internationalhttp://1000logos.net/wp Community-content/uploads/2017/07/Color School -FBLA -Logo.jpgWashington State 0 | SPACES [email protected] SpacesBellevue.com Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary…………………………...………………………………………2 2.0 Company Profile………………………………..……………………………………..3 2.1 Legal Form of Business 2.2 Effective Date of Business 2.3 Mission Statement 2.4 Company Governance 2.5 Immediate Development Goals 2.6 Financial Status 2.7 Company Location 3.0 Industry Analysis…………………………….…………………………………….……5 3.1 Description, Trends, and Opportunities 4.0 Target Market…………………………………………………………………………..6 4.1 Market Analysis 5.0 Competition Analysis………………………………………………………………....7 5.1 Key Competitors 5.2 Potential Future Competitors 5.3 Barriers for Future Entry 6.0 Marketing Strategy…………………………………………………………………..10 6.1 Key Message 6.2 Business to Business (B2B) and “SoLoMo” Tactics 6.3 Media Platforms 6.4 Sales Procedure and Strategy 7.0 Operations……………………………………………………………………….....…14 7.1 Business Facility 7.2 Production Plan 7.3 Personnel Plan 7.4 Impact of Technology 8.0 Management and Organization………………………………………………….21 8.1 Key Employees, Board of Directors, and Human Resources 8.2 Identifying, Recruiting, and Securing Key Participants 8.3 Compensation and Incentive Plans 9.0 Company Analysis…………………………………………………………………...21 9.1 Important Assumptions 9.2 Short- and Long-Term Development 9.3 Risk Analysis 9.4 SWOT Analysis 10.0 Financial
    [Show full text]
  • How Do You Do
    Schedule information listed here is subject to change without notice. JEFFERSON TRANSIT Kitsap Transit How Do You Do It? Bus transportation from Poulsbo to the Bainbridge Island Ferry Maybe you didn’t know you could (360) 697-2877 or 1-(800)-501-7433 take public transportation from Get To LINK Pioneer Square Station: http://www.kitsaptransit.com Port Townsend to the airport. WALK: If you travel lightly, it is an easy You can! It’s inexpensive, easy, almost as fast as walk to the Pioneer Square Station transit Washington State Ferries driving your car and no parking hassles! tunnel. The least hilly walk is to turn right on (206) 464-6400 for Seattle information To the Bainbridge Ferry: Alaskan Way and left on Yesler, as indicated on the map. The entrance to the tunnel is 511 Statewide Enjoy Seattle From the Haines Place Park & Ride in Port http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/ferries Townsend, take Jefferson Transit’s #7 bus to just past 2nd Ave, next to Smith Tower. En- or Poulsbo. ter the bus tunnel at 2nd Ave. and Yesler Sound Transit (Link Light Rail) Way. 1-(800) 201-4900 1-(888)-889-6368 At the end of the line, transfer to Kitsap go to SeaTac Transit’s #90 Express bus to the Bainbridge http://www.soundtransit.org BUS: If you take the walkway to the1st & Ferry Terminal. Airport for as Marion “Southbound Stop”, Metro’s #99 King County Metro Then walk on the ferry – it’s free when you make the eastbound crossing. bus comes by every 30 minutes and will take Public Transportation for Seattle and King County low as $6.50! you to 5th & Jackson, adjacent to the Inter- (206) 553-3000 or 1-(800)-542-7876 Once in downtown Seattle, take Sound Transit’s national District Train Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Update February 2020
    Investor Update February 2020 Investor Update February 2020 0 Important Notice This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable federal securities laws that are based upon our current expectations and assumptions concerning future events, which are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. The words “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “initiative,” “objective,” “plan,” “goal,” “project,” “outlook,” “priorities,” “target,” “intend,” “evaluate,” “pursue,” “commence,” “seek,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “believe,” “potential,” “continue,” or the negative of any of those words or similar expressions is intended to identify forward-looking statements. All statements contained in this presentation, other than statements of historical fact, including without limitation, statements about our plans, strategies, prospects and expectations regarding future events and our financial performance, are forward-looking statements that involve certain risks and uncertainties. In particular, any projections or expectations regarding the acquisition by CIT Bank of Mutual of Omaha Bank, our future revenues, expenses, earnings, capital expenditures, deposits or stock price, as well as the assumptions on which such expectations are based, are such forward-looking statements reflecting only our current judgment and are not guarantees of future performance or results. While these statements represent our current judgment
    [Show full text]
  • Legal News Alert Is a Publication for Distribution Without Charge to Our Clients and Friends
    SENIORS’ HOUSING LEGAL January 2008 NEWS ALERT Ruskin Moscou Faltischek’s The Industry Today Seniors’ Housing Capabilities The seniors' housing market has become soft, the gap between buyer and seller expectations has grown wider • Licensing Applications and Regulatory making it hard to get deals done, valuations have con- Matters tracted and will be driven by fundamentals instead of • Real Estate, Construction and Financing by cheap capital, cap rates are rising, the debt markets have become very conservative, and some lenders have • Contract Drafting and Reviews been changing their terms or just getting cold feet. • Counsel and Advice on Third Party Wayne L. Kaplan These factors combined or separately, are impacting Deals participants on both sides of the table. • Project Related Litigation Proceed with Caution • Compliance Audits The troubles in the subprime mortgage sector have sparked concerns about credit quality. However, some industry professionals are saying that the chang- • Fostering Alliances Between Housing and Healthcare Providers ing climate is not necessarily a bad thing. The seniors' housing market was get- ting far too overheated, with easy money spiking up the price of assets and • Exit Strategies lenders going higher and higher up the risk spectrum in order to put their dol- • Facility Sales and Refinancing lars into play. A fast adjustment was needed. This meant that on the debt side, borrowers could forget about high loan to values and lengthy interest-only peri- • Evaluating Model Types for Developers ods. The capital has become more expensive and harder to come by. As a • Federal and State Legislation result, an increasing number of deals are being re-priced or scrapped altogether.
    [Show full text]
  • Hta-2019-12-31-10-K.Pdf
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the year ended December 31, 2019 Commission File Number: 001-35568 (Healthcare Trust of America, Inc.) Commission File Number: 333-190916 (Healthcare Trust of America Holdings, LP) HEALTHCARE TRUST OF AMERICA, INC. HEALTHCARE TRUST OF AMERICA HOLDINGS, LP (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Maryland (Healthcare Trust of America, Inc.) 20-4738467 Delaware (Healthcare Trust of America Holdings, LP) 20-4738347 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 16435 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 320, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254 (480) 998-3478 http://www.htareit.com (Address of principal executive office and zip code) (Registrant's telephone (Internet address) number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered Common stock, $0.01 par value HTA New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. Yes No Healthcare Trust of America Holdings, LP Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. Yes No Healthcare Trust of America Holdings, LP Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form
    Forrfi No. 10-300 (Rev, 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR . NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ___________TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS______ | NAME HISTORIC AND/OR COMMON Pioneer Square Historic District LOCATION STREET& NUMBER , S f . A V • "—NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN/ (} fl ' 1 S £ Seattle _ VICINITY OF 7 j.u - Congressman Brock Adams _ r ——•. —— STATE CODE ^ COUNTY CODE Washinoton 53 Kind 033 * CLASSIFI C ATI ON CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE X-DISTRICT _PUBLIC JLOCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) _PRIVATE ^-UNOCCUPIED —X.COMMERCIAL -XPARK —STRUCTURE .KBOTH X^WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE ^ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS —YES: RESTRICTED ^GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC .X.BEING CONSIDERED X_YES: UNRESTRICTED JLlNDUSTRIAL -^TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY -XOTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY Mixed, public and private (see inventory) STREET & NUMBER CITY, TOWN STATE VICINITY OF LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS,ETC King County Courthouse and Seattle Municipal Building STREET & NUMBER CITY, TOWN STATE Seattle Washington 98104 REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Historic District Preservation Ordinance (Seattle City Ordinance No. 98852, DATE as amended) 1970 —FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY X_LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Qfflee of Urban Conservation, Seattle Department of Community Development CITY, TOWN Seattle WashingtonSTATE DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED -XORIGINALSITE .X.GOOD —RUINS JCALTERED —MOVED DATE. —FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE GENERAL STATEMENT Pioneer Square Historic District, as expanded by city ordinance in 1974 and further modi­ fied by this nomination, encompasses an area of approximately 88 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Office (Specialty Area 280)
    Major Offices Specialty Area 280 Commercial Revalue for 2020 Assessment Roll Department of Assessments Setting values, serving the community, and pursuing excellence 500 Fourth Avenue, ADM-AS 0708 Seattle, WA 98104-2384 OFFICE (206) 296-7300 FAX (206) 296-0595 Email: [email protected] http://www.kingcounty.gov/assessor/ Department of Assessments 1 Department of Assessments 500 Fourth Avenue, ADM-AS-0708 John Wilson Seattle, WA 98104-2384 OFFICE: (206) 296-7300 FAX (206) 296-0595 Assessor Email: [email protected] http://www.kingcounty.gov/assessor/ Dear Property Owners, Our field appraisers work hard throughout the year to visit properties in neighborhoods across King County. As a result, new commercial and residential valuation notices are mailed as values are completed. We value your property at its “true and fair value” reflecting its highest and best use as prescribed by state law (RCW 84.40.030; WAC 458-07-030). We continue to work to implement your feedback and ensure we provide you accurate and timely information. We have made significant improvements to our website and online tools to make interacting with us easier. The following report summarizes the results of the assessments for your area along with a map. Additionally, I have provided a brief tutorial of our property assessment process. It is meant to provide you with background information about our process and the basis for the assessments in your area. Fairness, accuracy and transparency set the foundation for effective and accountable government. I am pleased to continue to incorporate your input as we make ongoing improvements to serve you.
    [Show full text]