Estimating Basin Effects Using M9 and Recent Research for Tall Building Design in Seattle

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Estimating Basin Effects Using M9 and Recent Research for Tall Building Design in Seattle Estimating Basin Effects Using M9 and Recent Research for Tall Building Design in Seattle COSMOS Technical Session Susan Chang, Ph.D., P.E. I November 16, 2018 1 Seattle Basin Data courtesy of Richard Blakely 2 Tall Buildings in Seattle (100+ m, 328+ ft) Columbia Center Rainier Square Tower 1984, 933 ft 2020, 850 ft Russell Investments Center F5 Tower 2006, 598 ft 2017, 660 ft 1201 3rd Avenue 1988, 772 ft Smith Tower 1914, 462 ft Background Source: www.skyscrapercenter.com/city/seattle 31 buildings 31 buildings Figure from Doug Lindquist, Hart Crowser 3 March 4, 2013 Workshop Chang, S.W., Frankel., A.D., and Weaver, C.S., 2014, RePort on WorkshoP to IncorPorate Basin ResPonse in the Design of Tall Buildings in the Puget Sound Region, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey OPen-File RePort 20- 14-1196, 28 P., httPs://Pubs.usgs.gov/of/2014/1196/ • Basin amPlification factors from crustal ground motion models (amplification factors a function of Z2.5 and Z1.0) • ApPlied to MCER from PSHA for all EQ source tyPes Photo by Doug Lindquist, Hart Crowser 4 Recent Research Effect of DeeP Basins on Structural CollaPse During Large Subduction Earthquakes By Marafi, Eberhard, Berman, Wirth, and Frankel, Earthquake SPectra, August 2017 • Basin amPlification factors for sites with Z2.5 > 3 km Marafi et al. (2017) 5 Recent Research Observed amPlification of sPectral resPonse values for stiff sites in Seattle Basin referenced to Seward Park station – thin soil over firm rock 2003 under OlymPics, M4.8 outside of basin 2001 near SatsoP, M5.0 6 Recent Research Broadband Synthetic Seismograms for Magnitude 9 Earthquakes on the Cascadia Megathrust Based on 3D Simulations and Stochastic Synthetics (Part 1): Methodology and Overall Results By Frankel, Wirth, Marafi, Vidale, and StePhenson, submitted to BSSA January 2018, comPleted USGS internal review 7 USGS/SDCI March 22, 2018 Workshop Attendees Peer reviewers Geotechnical Consultants • C.B. Crouse (AECOM Seattle) • Doug Lindquist and Michael • Steve Dickenson (New Albion) Chamberlain (Hart Crowser) • • Ivan Wong (Lettis Consultants) Hamilton Puangnak and Melanie Walling (GeoEngineers) • Ali Shahbazian and Matt Gibson GMM develoPers and (Shannon & Wilson) seismologists • Reda Mikhail and Feng Li (Golder) • Norm Abrahamson (UC Berkeley) • Ken CamPbell (CoreLogic) • Andreas Skarlatoudis (AECOM LA) 8 USGS/SDCI March 22, 2018 Workshop Attendees USGS/M9 SDCI • Art Frankel (USGS /M9) • Susan Chang • Erin Wirth (USGS /M9) • Scott Pawling • Marc Eberhard (UW /M9) • Steve Kramer (UW/M9) Organizational RePresentatives • Kevin Aswegan (MKA, ASCE 7 Seismic Committee) • Andy Taylor (KPFF, SEAW EEC) • Douglas Beck (City of Bellevue) 9 Agenda • Basin factors from Ground Motion Models • How basin terms were developed for crustal GMMs • Presentations by Campbell and Abrahamson (Seyhan called in for part of workshop) • Incorporation of Basin ResPonse in Seattle • What have we been doing since the 2013 workshop? • Presentations by GeoEngineers and Hart Crowser • Recent Research • Effect of Deep Basins on Structural CollaPse During Large Subduction Earthquakes, Marafi et al., EQ Spectra, August 2017 • Broadband Synthetic Seismograms for M9 Earthquakes on the Cascadia Megathrust based on 3D Simulations and Stochastic Synthetics, Frankel et al., submitted to BSSA January 2018 • Basin Amplification Factors for Cascadia Based on the 2011 Tohoku, Japan Earthquake, Skarlatoudis et al., 11th NCEE, June 2018 (also USGS Final Technical Report, October 2015) • Site-specific MCER Response Spectra for Los Angeles Region based on 3D Numerical Simulations and the NGA West 2 Equations, Crouse, 11th NCEE, June 2018 10 Agenda • Code UPdates and Structural Design • ASCE 7-16 and 7-22 (C.B. Crouse) • UPcoming structural code changes (Andy Taylor) • Structural impacts (Kevin Aswegan) • Discussion and Recommendations 11 Discussion and Recommendations • We should continue with the general Procedure from 2013 workshoP: MCER sPectrum multiPlied by basin amplification factor. • Basin amplification factors develoPed from crustal earthquakes are not aPProPriate for subduction zone earthquakes (different from 2013 workshoP) CoPyright 2015 CoreLogic, Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Basin Amplification Z2.5,REF = 1.0 Discussion and Recommendations Z2.5,REF = 3.0 Figures from N. Marafi 2 13 New Consensus Approach for Development of BAFs • Interface Subduction Hazard (based on recorded motions and M9 Project) • BAF = 1 at T=0 sec • BAF = 2 at T > 2 sec • DeeP Intraslab Hazard • Use recorded ground motions from local and regional earthquakes (e.g. M6.8 Nisqually, M6.4 Vancouver Island) • Shallow Crustal Hazard • Use basin factors from CamPbell and Bozorgnia (2014) GMM 14 Example Spectra • Increase from old to new sPectra • T=1 sec, 10% • T=2 sec, 24% • T=5 sec, 15% 15 Implementation of March Workshop Results • Structural community concerned about immediate imPlementation • TelePhone conference May 16 with geotechnical and structural Peer reviewers, geotechnical consultants to discuss Potential delay in imPlementation • Schedule of imPlementation • Director’s Rule 20-2018 • December 1, 2018 • All designs using site-specific ground motion Procedures shall incorporate basin effects 16 On the horizon… • NGA Subduction GMMs • Will they include basin terms? • Geotechnical and seismological community will need to evaluate applicability to the Seattle Basin • How do we incorporate NGA Subduction and M9 results? • Had initial discussion during March 2018 workshoP • 2018 National Seismic Hazard MaP uPdate to include basin factors from 2013 SDCI/USGS workshoP 17 QUESTIONS? Susan Chang, Ph.D., P.E. [email protected] 206.386.9785 www.seattle.gov/sdci Data courtesy of Richard Blakely (USGS) 18.
Recommended publications
  • Major Office Specialty (Area 280) 2015 Revaluation
    Major Office Specialty (Area 280) 2015 Revaluation Department of Assessments Commercial Appraisal Office Specialty 280- 20 DENNY REGRADE - LAKE UNION - FREMONT 280- 10 SEATTLE CBD 280- 40 WATERFRONT - PILL HILL 280- 30 PIONEER SQUARE - SOUTH SEATTLE 280- 50 BELLEVUE - EASTSIDE 20 40 10 30 50 280- 60 NORTH-EAST-SOUTH 280- 60 NORTH-EAST-SOUTHC COOUNNTYTY The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intended for use as a survey product. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. King County Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County. Dept. of Assessments C:\Data\data\Commercial\Commercial_Areas\Specialtyedits.mxd King County Department of Assessments King County Administration Bldg. Lloyd Hara 500 Fourth Avenue, ADM-AS-0708 Seattle, WA 98104-2384 Assessor (206) 296-5195 FAX (206) 296-0595 Email: [email protected] As we start preparations for the 2015 property assessments, it is helpful to remember that the mission and work of the Assessor’s Office sets the foundation for efficient and effective government and is vital to ensure adequate funding for services in our communities.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Groundhog
    2018 Groundhog 2018 Groundhog In This Issue: • 2017-2018 Officers……………………………………………………………………………. 3 • President’s Message………………………………………………………………………….. 4 • An Update from Membership Chair…………………………………………………… 6 • 2017-2018 Events Schedule………………………………………………………………. 7 • UW Geo-Institute Graduate Student Society (GIGSS)………………………… 8 • Obituaries…………………………………………………………………………………………. 9 • Spring Seminar and Short Course Update………………………………………… 11 • Local Firm Summaries……………………………………………………………………… 12 www.seattlegeotech.org 2 2018 Groundhog 2017-2018 Officers From Left to Right: Ty Jahn, Dila Saidin, Drew Mason, Ben Blanchete Previous Page: Mark Rohrbach Not Pictured: Brendan Cioto, Dustin Taylor PRESIDENT PRESIDENT-ELECT Ben Blanchette, P.E. Fadzilah (Dila) Saidin, PhD, P.E. Hart Crowser ILF Consultants SECRETARY TREASURER Ty Jahn, P.E. Drew Mason, P.E. Condon-Johnson & Associates Guy F. Atkinson Construction MEMBERSHIP CHAIR EDUCATION CHAIR Mark Rohrbach, P.E., G.E., P. Eng. Fadzilah (Dila) Saidin, PhD, P.E. Hayward Baker ILF Consultants PUBLIC RELATIONS CHAIR WEBMASTER Brendan Cioto Dustin Taylor Shannon & Wilson UW Graduate Student www.seattlegeotech.org 3 2018 Groundhog President’s Message Happy Groundhog’s Day and welcome to the 2018 edition of The Groundhog! The ASCE Seattle Section Geotechnical Group and Seattle Geo‐Institute Chapter (SSGG/SGIC) produces this publication annually to share group announcements, provide our member firms with a forum to share their achievements over the previous year, and discuss our group’s activities and goals. As President of the SSGG/SGIC, I get to be the face of the group – welcoming you to meetings, sending out all of the group announcements, and leading group planning meetings. However, the real work of this group is done by our officers and volunteers, and I would be remiss not to recognize them here.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do You Do
    Schedule information listed here is subject to change without notice. JEFFERSON TRANSIT Kitsap Transit How Do You Do It? Bus transportation from Poulsbo to the Bainbridge Island Ferry Maybe you didn’t know you could (360) 697-2877 or 1-(800)-501-7433 take public transportation from Get To LINK Pioneer Square Station: http://www.kitsaptransit.com Port Townsend to the airport. WALK: If you travel lightly, it is an easy You can! It’s inexpensive, easy, almost as fast as walk to the Pioneer Square Station transit Washington State Ferries driving your car and no parking hassles! tunnel. The least hilly walk is to turn right on (206) 464-6400 for Seattle information To the Bainbridge Ferry: Alaskan Way and left on Yesler, as indicated on the map. The entrance to the tunnel is 511 Statewide Enjoy Seattle From the Haines Place Park & Ride in Port http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/ferries Townsend, take Jefferson Transit’s #7 bus to just past 2nd Ave, next to Smith Tower. En- or Poulsbo. ter the bus tunnel at 2nd Ave. and Yesler Sound Transit (Link Light Rail) Way. 1-(800) 201-4900 1-(888)-889-6368 At the end of the line, transfer to Kitsap go to SeaTac Transit’s #90 Express bus to the Bainbridge http://www.soundtransit.org BUS: If you take the walkway to the1st & Ferry Terminal. Airport for as Marion “Southbound Stop”, Metro’s #99 King County Metro Then walk on the ferry – it’s free when you make the eastbound crossing. bus comes by every 30 minutes and will take Public Transportation for Seattle and King County low as $6.50! you to 5th & Jackson, adjacent to the Inter- (206) 553-3000 or 1-(800)-542-7876 Once in downtown Seattle, take Sound Transit’s national District Train Station.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.86-Acres | 124395 Sf
    2.86-acres | 124,395 sf REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: unique development opportunity premier seattle land site located in south lake union INVESTMENT CONTACTS: Lori Hill Rob Hielscher Bob Hunt Managing Director Managing Director Managing Director Capital Markets International Capital Public Institutions +1 206 971 7006 +1 415 395 4948 +1 206 607 1754 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 601 Union Street, Suite 2800, Seattle, WA 98101 +1 206 607 1700 jll.com/seattle TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I The Offering 4 Introduction Investment Highlights Site Summary Objectives and Requirements Transaction Guidelines Section II Project Overview & Development Potential 17 South Lake Union Map and Legend Project Overview Zoning Zoning Map seattle Development Considerations Development Potential Section III RFP Process and Requirements 34 Solicitation Schedule Instructions and Contacts RFP Requirements Evaluation Process Post Selection Process Disclosures Section IV Market Characteristics 50 Market Overview Market Comparables Neighborhood Summary Regional Economy Section V Appendices 74 NORTH See page 75-76 for List of Appendix Documents Copyright ©2018 Jones Lang LaSalle. All rights reserved. Although information has been obtained from sources deemed reliable, Owner, Jones Lang LaSalle, and/or their representatives, brokers or agents make no guarantees as to the accuracy of the information contained herein, and offer the property without express or implied warranties of any kind. The property may be withdrawn without notice. If the recipient of this information has signed a confidentiality agreement regarding this matter, this information is subject to the terms of that agreement. Section I THE OFFERING 4 | Mercer Mega Block | Request for Proposals 520 REPLACE MERCER STREET LAKE UNION DEXTER AVE N ROY STREET ROY 99 NORTH Last large undeveloped site in South Lake Union | Mercer Mega Block | Request for Proposals 5 THE OFFERING INTRODUCTION MERCER MEGA BLOCK JLL is pleased to present the Mercer Mega Block, a 2.86-acre site acquisition opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Offices, Including T- Mobile’S Headquarters Within the Newport Corporate Center, Due to Its Easy Access Along the I-90 Corridor
    Commercial Revalue 2018 Assessment roll OFFICE AREA 280 King County, Department of Assessments Seattle, Washington John Wilson, Assessor Department of Assessments King County Administration Bldg. John Wilson 500 Fourth Avenue, ADM-AS-0708 Seattle, WA 98104-2384 Assessor (206)263-2300 FAX(206)296-0595 Email: [email protected] http://www.kingcounty.gov/assessor/ Dear Property Owners, Our field appraisers work hard throughout the year to visit properties in neighborhoods across King County. As a result, new commercial and residential valuation notices are mailed as values are completed. We value your property at its “true and fair value” reflecting its highest and best use as prescribed by state law (RCW 84.40.030; WAC 458-07-030). We continue to work hard to implement your feedback and ensure we provide accurate and timely information to you. We have made significant improvements to our website and online tools to make interacting with us easier. The following report summarizes the results of the assessments for your area along with a map. Additionally, I have provided a brief tutorial of our property assessment process. It is meant to provide you with background information about the process we use and our basis for the assessments in your area. Fairness, accuracy and transparency set the foundation for effective and accountable government. I am pleased to continue to incorporate your input as we make ongoing improvements to serve you. Our goal is to ensure every single taxpayer is treated fairly and equitably. Our office is here to serve you. Please don’t hesitate to contact us if you ever have any questions, comments or concerns about the property assessment process and how it relates to your property.
    [Show full text]
  • Aecom Fomss Nasa Contract Teammates and Award
    Aecom Fomss Nasa Contract Teammates And Award ContinuedSelf-imposed and and concurring deal Judy Ethelred outpaced never her mulchporisms contrariously deeds or theatricalizing when Geof afforests resinously. his Hiralalpharmacology. te-hees inductively. Center for the Study of Education Policy at Illinois State University. If you to continuing availability and friendships begin teaching economics and safety award and innovation initiatives, while operating costs with multiple concerts. House Jag Spirit Club members are taking orders for that special Valentine gift bag. Please bring all your textbooks in order to be cleared of book fines and overdue textbooks for this year. KP Engineering received two safety awards from the Safety Council of East Texas, and the International Space Station Visiting Vehicle programs and play a leading role in human space flight for NASA and the commercial space flight community. Atomenergoprom, or curtail further performance under one or more of our major contracts, but not exercised. Eskom is seeking to dispose of. Royce has been awarded a contract by EDF Energy to carry out. City and its residents. Do you enjoy cooking, Here Yee, and past performance volumes. Design, though, managing software libraries and creating tracking builds. In this study, and subsequently drive the cost of the program upward. Evaluation and improvement of clinical, Property, small satellites doing research in the geopotential field of the Earth. On the other hand, we classify the revenue based on the nature of the ultimate client receiving the services. This planning environment is driven by changing national policies and budgets, ND. Calling all females and males interested in the Cabrillo Aquatics teams.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle SDCI
    2019 The objectives for hosting the 2019 People’s Choice Urban Before voting, the public was asked to reflect on design and Design Awards were threefold: to dialogue with the public development in Seattle and consider key principles of urban about urban design issues and considerations; to promote design as criteria to evaluate projects. The public was invited to public understanding of the Design Review Program in vote for the project in each category which they felt Seattle; and to engage the public by voting on the finalist demonstrated design excellence. Voting occurred in person at projects which they feel best exhibit great urban design. We the 2019 Seattle Design Festival and via an online survey. We believe it is important to recognize and praise the many were very excited to receive over 500 votes in the People’s architects and developers that are going through the design Choice competition and are pleased to announce the winning review process and doing great work in our communities. buildings. Design Review Program staff started with a list of over 200 Design Review projects that were completed in the previous two years. Projects were sorted into three categories: Highrise, Midrise and Lowrise. Staff then went through several selection rounds to identify exemplary projects, based Thank you for participating! on the Council adopted Design Guidelines, resulting in a list of 9 projects per category. WHAT IS DESIGN REVIEW? Design Review is one of the tools the City uses to create a better city by giving citizens, the Design Review Boards and the Department of Construction and Inspections (SDCI) a voice in the design of most new multifamily and commercial buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Inc. Provides Expert Analysis on All Issues Affecting the Overall Business of Engineering
    FALL 2020 INC.INC. www.acec.orgwww.acec.org ENGINEERINGENGINEERINGAWARD-WINNING BUSINESS MAGAZINE ● PUBLISHEDPUBLISHED BYBY AMERICANAMERICAN COUNCILCOUNCIL OF ENGINEERING COMPANIES WATERSHED Barge Design Solutions’ reclamation project wins big at the 2020 Engineering Excellence Awards MOMENT Spotlight on PLI Survey: Profi le Black-Owned Member Firms on ACEC Firms Survive and Thrive Colorado THE BRIGHTEST IDEAS ARE IN ASPHALT Visionary engineers and researchers are constantly innovating asphalt pavements to meet the needs of the future. They’ve created game-changing products like warm-mix asphalt and Thinlays for pavement preservation — and they’re not done yet. The industry is already working on asphalt roads built to accommodate the safe use of driverless vehicles. This commitment to innovation is paving the way for even longer-lasting, higher-performing pavements. WHEN IT COMES TO INNOVATION ASPHALT PERFORMS LEARN MORE AT WWW.DRIVEASPHALT.ORG CONTENTSFall 2020 COVER STORY 2020 ENGINEERING EXCELLENCE AWARDS The first-ever virtual Gala showcased 203 projects 18 from leading firms around the country. The Copperhill Watershed Restoration in Ducktown, Tennessee, by Barge Design Solutions in Nashville, won the 2020 Grand Conceptor Award. The ACEC Research Institute provides the industry with cutting edge trend data, research and analysis to help firm owners make decisions and arm the Council with information to advance engineering’s essential value to a broad audience. The ACEC Research Institute wishes to extend its sincere appreciation to its generous contributors As of October 15, 2020 Founder’s$1 MILLION+ PREMIER Circle P ($50,000+)ARTNERS On Behalf of Richard and Mary Jo Stanley John & Karen Carrato Joni & Gary W.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form
    Forrfi No. 10-300 (Rev, 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR . NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ___________TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS______ | NAME HISTORIC AND/OR COMMON Pioneer Square Historic District LOCATION STREET& NUMBER , S f . A V • "—NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN/ (} fl ' 1 S £ Seattle _ VICINITY OF 7 j.u - Congressman Brock Adams _ r ——•. —— STATE CODE ^ COUNTY CODE Washinoton 53 Kind 033 * CLASSIFI C ATI ON CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE X-DISTRICT _PUBLIC JLOCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) _PRIVATE ^-UNOCCUPIED —X.COMMERCIAL -XPARK —STRUCTURE .KBOTH X^WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE ^ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS —YES: RESTRICTED ^GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC .X.BEING CONSIDERED X_YES: UNRESTRICTED JLlNDUSTRIAL -^TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY -XOTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY Mixed, public and private (see inventory) STREET & NUMBER CITY, TOWN STATE VICINITY OF LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS,ETC King County Courthouse and Seattle Municipal Building STREET & NUMBER CITY, TOWN STATE Seattle Washington 98104 REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Historic District Preservation Ordinance (Seattle City Ordinance No. 98852, DATE as amended) 1970 —FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY X_LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Qfflee of Urban Conservation, Seattle Department of Community Development CITY, TOWN Seattle WashingtonSTATE DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED -XORIGINALSITE .X.GOOD —RUINS JCALTERED —MOVED DATE. —FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE GENERAL STATEMENT Pioneer Square Historic District, as expanded by city ordinance in 1974 and further modi­ fied by this nomination, encompasses an area of approximately 88 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Office (Specialty Area 280)
    Major Offices Specialty Area 280 Commercial Revalue for 2020 Assessment Roll Department of Assessments Setting values, serving the community, and pursuing excellence 500 Fourth Avenue, ADM-AS 0708 Seattle, WA 98104-2384 OFFICE (206) 296-7300 FAX (206) 296-0595 Email: [email protected] http://www.kingcounty.gov/assessor/ Department of Assessments 1 Department of Assessments 500 Fourth Avenue, ADM-AS-0708 John Wilson Seattle, WA 98104-2384 OFFICE: (206) 296-7300 FAX (206) 296-0595 Assessor Email: [email protected] http://www.kingcounty.gov/assessor/ Dear Property Owners, Our field appraisers work hard throughout the year to visit properties in neighborhoods across King County. As a result, new commercial and residential valuation notices are mailed as values are completed. We value your property at its “true and fair value” reflecting its highest and best use as prescribed by state law (RCW 84.40.030; WAC 458-07-030). We continue to work to implement your feedback and ensure we provide you accurate and timely information. We have made significant improvements to our website and online tools to make interacting with us easier. The following report summarizes the results of the assessments for your area along with a map. Additionally, I have provided a brief tutorial of our property assessment process. It is meant to provide you with background information about our process and the basis for the assessments in your area. Fairness, accuracy and transparency set the foundation for effective and accountable government. I am pleased to continue to incorporate your input as we make ongoing improvements to serve you.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects
    Seattle New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 4Q19 ID PROPERTY UNITS 1 Ethos 494 9 Notch 158 Total Lease Up 652 22 Auburn Town Center 226 30 64th Avenue South & West Meeker Street 327 33 Traditions at Federal Way 200 35 Barton Terrace 66 49 Tukwila Village Phase II 210 53 Avalon Newcastle Commons Phase II 293 72 Vintage at Seatac 170 Total Under Construction 1,492 161 Quendall Terminals 692 162 River Run 130 173 Marques 183 174 Madison Plaza 157 189 2885 78th Avenue SE 155 Total Planned 1,317 354 Marketplace Phase II, The 354 355 Marketplace, The 331 356 Inneswood 93 357 Sammamish Town Center 414 362 7617 35th Avenue SW 50 379 Cloverdale 58 383 Thistle Court 55 384 1010 SW 122nd Street 112 385 Seatac Center Redevelopment 610 386 City Hall Redevelopment 550 387 VIA 405 270 388 Waynes Place 78 389 Kent Midway 265 390 Alexan Gateway 285 391 Auburn Gateway 500 392 Copper Gate 500 393 Legacy Plaza Senior Living 166 410 Atlas, The 98 411 Trailhead 360 415 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Phase II 226 Total Prospective 5,375 2 mi Source: Yardi Matrix LEGEND Lease-Up Under Construction Planned Prospective a Berkshire Hathaway and Jefferies Financial Group company Seattle New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 4Q19 ID PROPERTY UNITS 3 Modera Redmond 300 4 Parkside 664 8 Talisman 286 11 Blackbird 159 Total Lease Up 1,409 25 Parque Kirkland 70 27 434 Kirkland Way 173 37 Esterra Park Block 10 263 46 Alexan Central Park 193 60 Eight Eighty-Eight 158 65 Brio 258 263 16001 Redmond Way 107 68 BLU Bellevue 135 264 Avalon Redmond Campus
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Trademark History Tour
    HISTO RK RY A TO M U E R D A O F R T Visit Foley Hoag’s Trademark & Copyright Law blog at trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com foleyhoag.com SEATTLE TRADEMARK HISTORY TOUR This year, the great city of Seattle, Washington is the location of both the International Trademark Association Annual Meeting (May 19-23) and the American Intellectual Property Law Association Spring Meeting (May 15-17). If you are one of the many lawyers attending these events and you want a Seattle trademark experience, you could do the obvious and visit locations associated with the city’s famous modern brands. Alternatively, you could go back in time a bit further. Washington became the 42nd state in 1889, the same year the Great Seattle Fire destroyed much of the city. A combination of new railroad lines and post-fire construction led to a boom in population and commercial activity. On July 17, 1897, this already-promising economic climate went into hyper-drive when the S.S. Portland arrived from Alaska, heralding the beginning of the Klondike gold rush. The trademark disputes that arose from this economic activity started working their way into the published opinions of the Ninth Circuit and the newly christened Washington Supreme Court in the first decades of the twentieth century. We took a look at the first ten trademark disputes involving the city of Seattle (which date from the turn of the century up to the start of World War I). To our delight, we found them riddled with connections to celebrities, shootouts, world politics and the multicultural fabric of migration in the American west.
    [Show full text]