DOCSLIB.ORG

Do Not Fold, Spindle Or Mutilate": a Cultural History of the Punch Card

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Do Not Fold, Spindle Or Mutilate "Do Not Fold, Spindle or Mutilate": A Cultural History of the Punch Card Steven Lubar One hundred years have passed since Herman Life and Casualty company used punch card Hollerith invented the punch card to tabulate the machines to compile mortality datastarting in 1910 1890ce nsus. That's also, almost exactly, the lifespan (Campbell-Kelly 144, Norberg). The machinery of the technology. Today, punch cards have found great favor with management. Using vanished from public view. The last few businesses language that we wouldn't be surprised to find in that still use punch cards are phasing them out, a modern-day report on computerization, one replacing punch card systems with computers, author wrote in 1926: optical scanners and magnetic storage media. But one aspect of the era of the punch card invaded the national subconscious to leave an ironic Punch card systems are a proved means of economically cultural legacy. The punch card era survives in the producing facts and figures vital to operating a railroad phrase "do not fold, spindle, or mutilate." The intelligently, from which business records can be quickly and phrase and the feelings it represents have outlasted accurately classified and presented to the executives at the time the technology, not to mention the billions of cards they arene ededin the form best suited to enable action. (Railway on which it was printed. Culture changes more Accounting !15!1-54) Punch card machines were modem and efficient­ slowly than technology. Symbols outlast machines. what we'd call today "high tech." It's easy to see The signified slides under the signifier. This cultural legacy is an important vestige how they came to symbolize all that was up to date of the punch card. Symbols are part reality and part and businesslike. mental image, and so they capture attitudes, feelings These early punch cards had no warning and beliefs-immaterial things sometimes hard to written on them. The cards Hollerith used for the find in the historic record. The phrase "do not fold, first automated census in 1890 were completely spindle or mutilate" has stuck so in our heads blank, unreadable except to machines. Either an because it captures a significant facet of American attempt to save money, or a piece of bravado, that; belief about automation, computerization and but Censusclerks soonlea rned to decipher the holes bureaucratic society. The history of the phrase can almost as quickly as the machines could (Austrian help to explain popular reaction to the computer­ 63). In only a few years cards had a variety of symbols ization of American society. on them, to indicate the meanings of the holes, but The federal government became the first major it was not until the 19-'0s that the first warnings user of punch cards when the Census Bureau used appeared. This is, as far as I can tell, exactly the them to tabulate the 1890 census. Hollerith's same time that the public began to see punch cards. machines soon found wide use in government The two events are, of course, related; the public offices. During World War I, for example, the army needed to be taught how to deal with the new used them to keep inventory and medical and technology. People had to learn to respec:t it, and psychological records, and the War Industries Board not to get in its way. did its accounting on the machines (Reid-Green, Among the earliest punch cards to "go public" Austrian, Cortata). were those used by New Deal agencies. New Dealers, Businesses also used punch cards. Starting familiar with the successful World War I experience about 1906, railroads replaced the complicated with using punch cards to coordinate the military systems of paperwork they used to track operating and the economy, put punch card machinery to use expenses, the location of rolling stock and goods in many social and economic programs. The first in shipment with punch card tabulating machines. "punch card checks" -among the first punch cards Insurance companies were not far behind: the Aetna to be distributed to the "end user," the man and This work was written by a US Federal Employee and as such is in the Public Domain woman in the street-were issued by the Agricul­ the canonical "Do not fold, spindle, or mutilate" tural Adjustment Administration in 1933. Social are lost in the mists of time. Security checks, issued starting in 1936, were also "Do not fold, spindle, or mutilate." Folding punch cards, and before long, from World War II seems clear; you might fold a card to fit in an until just a short while ago, all federal checks­ envelope, or a pockeL But you're not supposed to some 600million in 1985-were punch cards (Figure crease these cards; that would jam the machine. l) (Bartlet 29, Beninger 409, Schwartz). The public's Punch cards aren't to be used in your ways, for first introduction to punch cards was in connection your purposes, but for those of the company that with the introduction of the biggest and best issued them. "Spindle" is the word that most publicized-and most controversial-new bureauc­ confuses people today. Spindling is an old filing racies. The technologywas still exotic, though. The system; a clerk would have a spindle, an upright New Yorker ran a story in 1940 about the crowds spike, on his or her desk, and would impale each that gathered in front of an office-supply store in piece of paper on it as he or she finished with it. Albany to watch punch card sorting machines in When the spindle was full, he'd run a piece of string action (Gibbs 54££). through the holes, tie up the bundle, and ship it Card punch technology became more wides­ off to the archives. (The custom still survives in pread in the 1940s. Libraries began to use punch some restaurants; the cashier spindles the bills as cards to keep track of books ("Automatic Book customers pay.) But you shouldn't spindle the cards: Charging," Waugh). Police departments used them they are part of someone else's system of paperwork, to track criminals. Their use in payroll and factory not your own; they demand special attention. management expanded. Newspapersand magazines ran popular articles on the technology. Almost all "Mutilate" is a lot stronger than the other of the description focused on the machines words. It expresses an angry intention on the part themselves, reporters outdoing one another with of the mutilator. From the viewpoint of the punch metaphors for the technology's utility. The card used, it suggests a fear: people might take out their frustrations on their punch cards. (Indeed, Saturday Evening Post referred to the Los Angeles Police Department's Hollerith machine as "a punch cards were mutilated. You could buy mechanical Sherlock Holmes," a "crime-hating machines advertised to "recondition mutilated robot," "The Detective Who Never Sleeps" punch cards" [Data Processing Annual 45].) Why (Monroe, Soraghan). The 1940 Census starred in would people mutilate punch cards? Punch cards were the interface between the public and the billing a Colliers Magazine article that called the punch card machine a "statistical sausage grinder," "the system. Metaphorically, they were where the public most amazing fortunetelling machines ever devised" meshed with the corporate world. They became (Scheinfeld). symbolic of the whole system. Earlier, it had been But it was in the 1950s, after the invention of the machines that were the focus of attention; in the computer and the beginning of its use in the 1960s the cards took center stage. business, that everyone began to see punch cards. Punch cards became not only a symbol for the Companies sent punch cards out with bills. computer (MacBride 24), but a symbol of alienation. Telephone companies, utility companies and They stood for abstraction, oversimplification and department stores realized that they could save a dehumanization. The cards were, it seemed, a two­ step in their billing process, as well as make it easier dimensional portrait of people, people abstracted for them to process the returned check, by using into numbers that machines could use. The cards the cards themselves as the bills (Data Processing came to represent a society where it seemed that Annual). By the 1960s, punch cards were familiar, machines had become more importantthan people, everyday objects. where people had to change their ways to suit the While company employees could be trusted, or machines. People weren't dealing with each other required, to take care of the cards, the person in face-to-face, but rather through the medium of the the street could not. Warnings were necessary. In punch card. All of the free-floating anxiety about the 1930s the University of Iowa used cards for technology, the information society, "Big Broth­ student registration; on each card was printed "Do erism," and automation attached itself to punch not fold or bend this card" (Baehne 32). Cards cards. Examining the metaphorical ways in which reproduced in an IBM sales brochure of the 1930s punch cards were used lets us understand some of read "Do not fold, tear, or mutilate this card" and the reaction and resistance to the brave new "Do not fold, tear or destroy" ("Modem Machine information world (Terbourgh, MacBride Chaps. Accounting" 4 and 6). The author and origin of 2 and 3, Gilbert 175-81, Michael). "Do Not Fold, Spindle or Mutilate" Figure l. Social Security checks, starting with this first one in 1940, were punch cards. Courtesy U.S. Social Security Administration. The first place that "do not fold, spindle or Berkeley students were well aware of the mutilate" was taken off the punch card and standard 1960s notion that the United States had unpacked in all its metaphorical glory was the become an "organizational society." They believed, student protests at the University of California­ with most of the popular sociological writers of Berkeley in the mid-l 960s, what became known as the day, that "the shape and tone of our society, the "Free Speech Movement." The University of indeed the very way we think is dependent upon California administration used punch cardsfor class the products and information processed by large registration.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Data Processing with Unit Record Equipment in Iceland
    Data Processing with Unit Record Equipment in Iceland Óttar Kjartansson (Retired) Manager of Data Processing Department at Skýrr, Iceland [email protected] Abstract. This paper presents an overview of the usage of unit record equipment and punched cards in Iceland and introduces some of the pioneers. The usage of punched cards as a media in file processing started 1949 and became the dominant machine readable media in Iceland until 1968. After that punched cards were still used as data entry media for a while but went completely out of use in 1982. Keywords: Data processing, unit record, punched card, Iceland. 1 Hagstofa Íslands Hagstofa Íslands (Statistical Bureau of Iceland) initiated the use of 80 column punched cards and unit record equipment in Iceland in the year 1949. The first ma- chinery consisted of tabulating machine of the type IBM 285 (handled numbers only), the associated key punch machines, verifiers, and a card sorter. See Figures 1 and 2. This equipment was primarily used to account for the import and export for Iceland. Skýrr (Skýrsluvélar ríkisins og Reykjavíkurborgar - The Icelandic State and Munici- pal Data Center) was established three years later by an initiative from Hagstofa Íslands, Rafmagnsveita Reykjavíkur (Reykjavík Electric Power Utility), and the Medical Director of Health of Iceland as was described in an earlier article [3]. Fig. 1. IBM 285 Electric Accounting Machine at Hagstofa Íslands year 1949 J. Impagliazzo, T. Järvi, and P. Paju (Eds.): HiNC 2, IFIP AICT 303, pp. 225–229, 2009. © IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2009 226 Ó. Kjartansson Fig. 2. Early form of the data registration using a punched card.
    [Show full text]
  • Hollerith Punched Card Code
    ANSI X3.26-1970 ' •> American National Standard Adopled tor Use by the Federal Government Hollerith punched card code FIPS PUB 14 See Nolice on Inside Front Cover 6-1970 3.2 X This standard was approved as a Federal Information Processing Standard by the Office of Management and Budget on June 16, 1971. Details concerning the use of this standard within the Federal Government are contained in FIPS PUB 14, HOLLERITH PUNCHED CARD CODE. For a complete list of the publications available in the FEDERAL INFORMATION PROCESSING STANDARDS Series, write to the Office of Technical Information and Publications, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C. 20234. ANSI X3.26-1970 American National Standard Hollerith Punched Card Code American National Standard This standard is one of approximately 6000 approved as either a USA Standard or as an American Standard. It became an American National Standard in October 1969 when the Institute changed its name to American National Standards Institute, Inc. ANSI, 1430 Broadway, New York, N.Y. 10018 J Sponsor Business Equipment Manufacturers Association Approved January 19, 1970 American National Standards Institute, Inc American National Standard An American National Standard implies a consensus of those sub¬ stantially concerned with its scope and provisions. An American National Standard is intended as a guide to aid the manufacturer, the consumer, and the general public. The existence of an American National Standard does not in any respect preclude anyone, whether he has approved the standard or not, from manufacturing, marketing, purchasing, or using products, processes, or procedures not conforming to the standard. American National Standards are subject to periodic review and users are cautioned to obtain the latest editions.
    [Show full text]
  • An End to History
    AN END TO HISTORY Mario Savio Mario Savio, a leader of the Free Speech Movement, seemed to articulate the pent­up feelings and frustrations of many students. In one of the most famous speeches of the early new left, Savio told a huge campus rally to resist the Berkeley administration: "There's a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can't take part, you can't even tacitly take part. And you've Got to put your bodies upon the Gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus and you've Got to make it stop. And you've Got to indicate to the people who run it, to the people who own it, that unless you're free, the machine will be prevented from workinG at all." In the essay that follows, written in 1964, Savio enunciates many new left themes: the hierarchical and bureaucratic nature of American society and of the University of California, the alienation of students, the limitation of speech to that which is not critical political speech, the existence of racial injustice, and the links between the civil rights movement and the student movement Last summer I went to Mississippi to join the struGGle there for civil riGhts. This fall I am enGaGed in another phase of the same struGGle, this time in Berkeley. The two battlefields may seem quite different to some observers, but this is not the case. The same riGhts are at stake in both places‐the riGht to participate as citizens in democratic society and the riGht to due process of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Herman Hollerith and Early Mechanical/Electrical Tabulator/Sorters
    Herman Hollerith and early mechanical/electrical tabulator/sorters The US Constitution requires that the people of the U.S. be counted every ten years and that the members of the House of Representatives “be apportioned among the States according to their respective numbers”1. (The other house of Congress, the Senate, has two members from each state.) Accordingly, every ten years, a census is taken. By 1880, the census was becoming harder and harder to accomplish. Everything was done on paper. Marks were placed in squares on paper, the marked squares were counted, and of course people made many mistakes. Further, the census was used more and more not just to count people but to get useful data on age, gender, marital status, working status, and so on. There were more and more marks to make and count! Herman Hollerith: the inventor of mechanical/electrical data processing systems Herman Hollerith graduated from the Columbia University School of Mines (in New York City) in 1879 at the age of 19. He knew about the problems with the census and be- gan research into mechanizing part of the counting of the census. In 1882, he taught me- chanical engineering at MIT and conducted his first experiments with punched cards. He was extremely successful, and he soon moved to Washington D.C. and set up a company, The Hollerith Electric Tabulating System. By the middle of the 1880’s, his first punched-card system was working. His company provided the Census Office with the equipment used in processing the 1890 census —62 million punched cards were processed by his machines, cutting two years off the time to complete the census.
    [Show full text]
  • Punched Card - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1 of 11
    .... _ ALL COMMUNICATIONS IN REFERENCE TO FORESTRY TO BE ADDRESSED TO THE CHIEF FORESTER VICTORIA. B.C. TIlE GO'IEIltDIEIIT Of THE P/IOVJII!;E DfBRItISH CIIJIIIIA DEPARTMENT OF LANDS FOREST BRANCH Yay 16th, 1928. H. J. Coles, Esq., Port Alberni, B.C. Please refer to File No. Management 081406 Dear Sirl- This is to advise that you passed the Licensed Scaler's Examina- tion held by Mr. A. L. Bryant a.t Vancouver, B.C., on May 2nd and 3rd, 1928. Your ~cence No. 811 is enclosed herewith. Xours truly, JM/pb • 1 Enc.l• N° 811 lHE 60VERNMIJIT OF '(f£ PROVINCe OF BRlnsH CIl.UIBIA FOREST ACT AND AMENDMENTS. ~raliug mirturt. FOREST BRANCH, LANDS DEPARTtvt~_NT. r)//) -4 ««e/<i;««<<<</tJ<<<<< < «««<<<<<<<<<<<<<<.<<. 192.K. .. W41n 1n tn (!1rrtify thatC~. /~~J.(~ff/~ -z::.~l::k~ -r1J->·r /7' £I P' . ;j residing at./!&~ L.1~~~-t.- Yi...-£" ~ ~ . ", in the Province of British Columbia, ;;.«~ ~ d-1~ ed ;22 2. / q "'r 8::. b has been examin /07 .••• =Zf'7;m .m.' mm.. .... ... m.................... /~ ..... .... ......... y •••• ««««<<<<<... - «««««< <(.,"F«<· < «. «<.««< of the Board of Examiners for Licensing alers, as provided in the "Forest Act" and amendments, and having creditably passed the said examination is hereby appointed a Licensed Scaler, and ·is duly authorized to perform the duties of a Licensed Scaler, as specified under Part VIII. of the "Forest <~:<~,.(_2.,_,;,::c,.(. «c.,"G~~< .. .. < ••• «« ••• «<•• CHAIRMAN OF BOARD OF EXAMINERS. Punched card - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 11 Punched card From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia A punched card (or punch card or Hollerith card or IBM card) is a piece of stiff paper that contains digital information represented by the presence or absence of holes in predefined positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Onetouch 4.0 Sanned Documents
    TO: MSPM Distribution FROM: J. H. Saltzer SUBJECT: 88.3.02 DATE: 02/05/68 This revision of BB.3.02 is because 1. The ASCII standard character set has been approved. References are altered accordingly. 2. The latest proposed ASCII standard card code has been revised slightly. Since the Multics standard card code matches the ASCII standard wherever convenient# 88.3.02 is changed. Codes for the grave accent# left and right brace, and tilde are affected. 3. One misprint has been corrected; the code for capita 1 11 S" is changed. MULTICS SYSTEM-PROGRAMMERS' MANUAL SECTION BB.3.02 PAGE 1 Published: 02/05/68; (Supersedes: BB.3.02; 03/30/67; BC.2.06; 11/10/66) Identification Multics standard card punch codes and Relation between ASCII and EBCDIC J • H • Sa 1 tze r Purpose This section defines standard card punch codes to be used in representing ASCII characters for use with Multics. Since the card punch codes are based on the punch codes defined for the IBM EBCDIC standard, automatically a correspondence between the EBCDIC and ASCII character sets is also defined. Note The Multics standard card punch codes described in this section are DQ! identical to the currently proposed ASCII punched card code. The proposed ASCII standard code is not supported by any currently available punched card equipment; until such support exists it is not a practical standard for Multics work. The Multics standard card punch code described here is based on widely available card handling equipment used with IBM System/360 computers. The six characters for which the Multics standard card code differs with the ASCII card code are noted in the table below.
    [Show full text]
  • Berkeley-In-The-60S-Transcript.Pdf
    l..J:J __J -- '-' ... BERKELEY IN THE SIXITES Transcript House n-American Activities Committee Demonstration, May 196(J (Music. "Ke a Knockin") T Narrator: y In the 1960s y generation set out on a journey of change. Coming out of an atmosphere f conformity a new spirit began to appear. One of the first signs was a demo tration, organized by Berkeley students in May of 1960 against .;')~u.P -'- the House -American Activities Committee. Archival/Co gressman Willis, HUAC Chairman: \ ' .., iJ' ,o-, «\' What we are ere to do is to gather information as we are ordered to by an act of Congress ith respect to the general operation of the communist conspiracy. Chairman W lis (off camera): Proceed to th next question. Archival/Un entified Witness: I'm not in the habit of being intimidated and I don't expect to start now. Now what was yo_ question? "{/\Thatwas your question. C Lawyer (off camera): Are you now n this instant a member of the communist party. BITS TRAN RIPT 2 t,...J-,,i._l-.. } 'Li..- Narrator: We came out 0 protest because we were against HUAC's suppression of political free m. In the 50s HUAC created a climate of fear by putting people on trial for t ir political beliefs. Any views left of center were labeled subversive. e refused to go back to McCarthyism. Archival/Wi liam Mandel: )/",'; 0 ~ If you think am going to cooperate with this collection of Judases, of men who sit ther in violation of the United States Constitution, if you think I will cooperat with you in any way, you are insane.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Movements and Political Action
    SOC 141: Social Movements and Political Action SOCIAL MOVEMENTS University of California, Berkeley FALL 2020 Laleh Behbehanian, Ph.D. Tuesday/Thursday 11:00–12:30 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: wejoinin.com/LalehBehbehanian Monday 3:00-4:00 & Tuesday 2:00-3:00 While this course introduces students to sociological scholarship on social movements, it aims to do so from the perspective of movements themselves. We explore a variety of social movements in 20th and 21st century U.S. history, including: the Movement of the Unemployed; the Civil Rights and Black Power Movements; The Free Speech Movement; the Chicano Movement; the Gay Liberation Movement; the Occupy Movement; Black Lives Matter; and Standing Rock. Focusing on questions and concerns that emanate from the experiences of these movements, we turn to sociological and social science scholarship to develop analytic and theoretical approaches that enable us to pursue those questions. What are the conditions that allow for (or obstruct) the emergence of a movement, and how can we recognize and fully exploit those conditions when they arise? What forms of organization have facilitated movements, and which have endangered them? What different kinds of strategies and tactics have various movements adopted and how effective have they been in different contexts? What strategic and tactical innovations have been introduced in the contemporary period? What challenges and forms of repression have movements faced historically and how have they adapted? Finally, how can we fully assess the impacts of movements, even accounting for their unintended reverberations? INTRODUCTION – Social Movements & Sociology 8/27 COURSE INTRODUCTION: Social Movements & Sociology The Power of Disruption – The Movement of the Unemployed 9/1 The Structuring of Protest Piven, Frances Fox and Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Teleprinters and Punched Tape Equipment
    1st Edition . April 1956 2nd Edition . January 1958 Digital Recreation - Sam Hallas (G8EXV): April 2008 BULLETIN PT56 (Ed. 2) . JANUARY 1958 an introduction to TELEPRINTERS and PUNCHED TAPE EQUIPMENT TELEGRAPH HOUSE CROYDON, ENGLAND TELEPHONE : CROYDON 2121 (10 LINES) TELEGRAPHIC ADDRESS : CREDO, TELEX, CROYDON TELEX : 28836 © 1958 by Creed & Company Limited 1 2 CONTENTS PAGE 5 Introduction Part I: Teleprinters A. BASIC PRINCIPLES 7 Definitions 7 Intelligence 9 Teleprinter Code 11 Start-Stop Principle 11 Telegraph Signals 17 Telegraph Speed B. OUTLINE DESCRIPTION OF A TELEPRINTER 15 Stages of Transmission 16 Keyboard 16 Receiver Part II: Punched Tape Equipment C. PUNCHED TAPE TECHNIQUE 20 Kinds of Punched Tape 22 Methods of Coding Information on Punched Tape D. TYPES OF PUNCHED TAPE EQUIPMENT 28 Keyboard Perforators 30 Tape Readers 34 Perforator-Readers 35 Reperforators 39 Auxiliary Equipment E. APPLICATIONS TO DIGITAL COMPUTERS 41 Input Preparation 48 Input Transmission 49 Output Recording and Printing F. FURTHER PUNCHED TAPE APPLICATIONS 50 Punched Tape-Punched Card Systems 50 Mechanised Addressing Equipment 51 Process Control 3 4 INTRODUCTION Creed Teleprinters and Punched Tape equipment were originally developed for use in the telegraph communication field and they have been increasingly used ever since in telegraph systems all over the world. During recent years, however, their use has been extended beyond this tradi- tional field to a rapidly growing number of non-telegraphic applications such as the provision of input and output facilities for digital computers and the increased automatisation of existing systems such as punched card accounting and mechanised addressing. As a result of this sudden increase in the number of applications that are being found for Teleprinters and Punched Tape, considerable interest is being shown in this equipment by engineers and others who wish to discover whether it can be applied to their own special problems but who lack sufficient knowledge of the basic principles involved to permit them to do this.
    [Show full text]
  • E Pluribus Unum: the Berkeley Free Speech Movement of 1964 Madeleine Riskin-Kutz
    E pluribus unum: The Berkeley Free Speech Movement of 1964 Madeleine Riskin-Kutz Free Speech Movement march through Sather Gate, Mona Hutchin on the extreme right (marchers’ perspective) and Mario Savio on the extreme left. From Warshaw p.56, photo credit: Ron Enfield, Nov. 20, 1964 Madeleine R-K, E pluribus unum, cont. During the academic year of 1964-65, a political movement took place at the University of California (UC), Berkeley bringing together students and faculty from across the political spectrum — from communists to campaigners for right-wing Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater. Members of the movement united in their demand for free speech on campus and specifically, to be allowed to set up tables on campus to campaign for political causes. Their movement took place through demonstrations and sit-ins, ultimately achieving success in December 1964, when the academic senate voted unanimously to approve a resolution that there would henceforth be no restrictions on the content of speech or political advocacy on campus, except in regard to time, place and manner. Histories of the Free Speech Movement (FSM) have represented it as left wing and have therefore overlooked one of its essential features: it was a broad coalition operating largely by consensus among people with widely differing political views. By restoring the center-to-right wing side of the history of the FSM, we can first of all recognize this broad coalition’s existence, then also understand it was possible because of a form of universalism among students. A universal principle united the members of the Free Speech Movement.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Digital Storage White Paper
    History of Digital Storage Dean Klein Vice President of System Memory Development Micron Technology, Inc. December 15, 2008 Purpose Introduction: Throughout modern history many and various digital The Need to Store Data storage systems have been researched, developed, Since men first scribbled on cave walls, humanity has manufactured, and eventually surpassed in an effort to recognized the instrinic value of information and has address ever-increasing demands for density, operating employed a variety of ways and means to safely store speed, low latency, endurance, and economy.1 This cycle it. The ability to reference numbers for calculation or to of innovation has lead us to a new generation of NAND review information for planning, learning, and action Flash memory-based solid state drives (SSDs) that repre- is fundamental since “all computations, either mental, sent the next evolutionary step in both enterprise and mechanical, or electronic require a storage system of consumer storage applications. some kind, whether the numbers be written on paper, remembered in our brain, counted on the mechanical This paper surveys the memory storage landscape of devices of a gear, punched as holes in paper, or translated the past 50 years—starting at the beginning of digital into electronic circuitry.”2 storage and paying homage to IBM’s groundbreaking RAMAC disk storage unit and StorageTek’s DRAM-based In day-to-day life, this fundamental need to store data SSD; then enumerating the benefits of modern NAND generates innumerable documents, spreadsheets, files, Flash memory and advanced SSDs; and finally looking e-mails, and trillions of other work-related bytes all forward to the near-future possibilities of nonvolatile stored on disks around the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • 8804110 the Free Speech Movement: a Case Study In
    8804110 THE FREE SPEECH MOVEMENT: A CASE STUDY IN THE RHETORIC OF SOCIAL INTERVENTION Stoner, Mark Reed, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1987 © 1987 Stoner, Mark Reed All rights reserved 300 N. ZeebRd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this document have been identified here with a check mark V . 1. Glossy photographs or pages_____ 2. Colored illustrations, paper or_______ print 3. Photographs with dark background_____ 4. Illustrations are poor copy_______ 5. Pages with black marks, not original copy ^ 6. Print shows through as there is text on both sides_______ of page 7. Indistinct, broken or small print on several________ pages 8. Print exceeds margin requirements______ 9. Tightly bound copy with print lost_______ in spine 10. Computer printout pages with indistinct_______ print 11. Page(s) ____________lacking when material received, and not available from school or author. 12. Page(s)____________seem to be missing in numbering only as text follows. 13. Two pages numbered . Text follows. 14. Curling and wrinkled pages______ 15. Dissertation contains pages with print at a slant, filmed as received__________ 16. Other____________________________________________________________________________ UMI THE FREE SPEECH MOVEMENT: A CASE STUDY IN THE RHETORIC OF SOCIAL INTERVENTION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Mark Reed Stoner, B.S., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 1987 Dissertation Committee: Approved By John J. Makay William R. Brown / Adviser James L. Golden department of Comrrtlmication Copyr ight © by Mark Reed Stoner 1987 To My Wife, Daria, and my Children, Ian and Heather Whose Encouragement, Love and Support Made This Project Possible i i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to acknowledge the invaluable help o£ my advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]