EAC Procceding
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Aid to Channel 4 Linked to Digital Switchover Invitation to Submit Comments Pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty
C 137/16EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.6.2008 STATE AID — UNITED KINGDOM State aid C 13/08 (ex N 589/07) — Aid to Channel 4 linked to digital switchover Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (Text with EEA relevance) (2008/C 137/10) By means of the letter dated 2 April 2008 reproduced in the authentic language on the pages following this summary, the Commission notified the United Kingdom of its decision to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty concerning the proposed financial support to Channel 4 to enable it to meet the costs of digital switchover. Interested parties may submit their comments on the measure in respect of which the Commission is initi- ating the procedure within one month of the date of publication of this summary and the following letter, to: European Commission Directorate-General for Competition State Aid Registry SPA 3 6/5 B-1049 Brussels Fax (32-2) 296 12 42 These comments will be communicated to the United Kingdom. Confidential treatment of the identity of the interested party submitting the comments may be requested in writing, stating the reasons for the request. TEXT OF SUMMARY The UK authorities accept that the notified measure constitutes an aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty. They argue however that the measure is compatible with the Treaty by virtue of Article 86(2), having regard to the Commission's 1 PROCEDURE Communication ( ) on the application of the State aid rules in relation to public service broadcasting (‘the Communication’) and the three particular criteria according to which the compati- The measures on which the Commission has opened the proce- bility of aid of this nature falls to be judged, namely, definition, dure laid down in Article 88(2) was brought to the Commis- entrustment and proportionality. -
The BBC's Use of Spectrum
The BBC’s Efficient and Effective use of Spectrum Review by Deloitte & Touche LLP commissioned by the BBC Trust’s Finance and Strategy Committee BBC’s Trust Response to the Deloitte & Touche LLPValue for Money study It is the responsibility of the BBC Trust,under the As the report acknowledges the BBC’s focus since Royal Charter,to ensure that Value for Money is the launch of Freeview on maximising the reach achieved by the BBC through its spending of the of the service, the robustness of the signal and licence fee. the picture quality has supported the development In order to fulfil this responsibility,the Trust and success of the digital terrestrial television commissions and publishes a series of independent (DTT) platform. Freeview is now established as the Value for Money reviews each year after discussing most popular digital TV platform. its programme with the Comptroller and Auditor This has led to increased demand for capacity General – the head of the National Audit Office as the BBC and other broadcasters develop (NAO).The reviews are undertaken by the NAO aspirations for new services such as high definition or other external agencies. television. Since capacity on the platform is finite, This study,commissioned by the Trust’s Finance the opportunity costs of spectrum use are high. and Strategy Committee on behalf of the Trust and The BBC must now change its focus from building undertaken by Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”), the DTT platform to ensuring that it uses its looks at how efficiently and effectively the BBC spectrum capacity as efficiently as possible and uses the spectrum available to it, and provides provides maximum Value for Money to licence insight into the future challenges and opportunities payers.The BBC Executive affirms this position facing the BBC in the use of the spectrum. -
Channel Four Television Corporation Report and Financial Statements 2008 Channel Four Television Corporation Report and Financial Statements 2008
Channel Four Television Corporation Report and Financial Statements 2008 Channel Four Television Corporation Report and Financial Statements 2008 Broadcasting Act 1990 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Paragraph 13(1) of Schedule 3 to the Broadcasting Act 1990 Contents Introduction Scale and impact Chairman’s introduction 04 Viewer impact 60 Chief Executive’s introduction 06 Top tens 64 Output and spend 66 Channel 4’s public impact 08 Creative economy impact 68 Talent ladder 70 Nurture Partnerships 71 Awards 72 Film4 Productions and Slumdog Millionaire 12 Comedy Lab 14 Final comments on public impact report 76 The Devil’s Whore 16 Assurance statement 77 City of Vice 18 Key measures 20 Finance Challenge Operating and financial review 80 Report of the members 84 Saving Africa’s Witch Children 24 Report of the auditors 86 Dispatches and Unreported World 26 Consolidated income statement 88 Channel 4 News 28 Balance sheets 89 The Family 30 Cashflow statements 90 Key measures 32 Significant accounting policies 91 Notes to the financial statements 95 Champion Corporate governance 121 Members 127 Islam Unveiled 36 Report on members’ remuneration 128 Big Brother 38 Programmes and the licence 132 Hunger 40 Historical record 134 Disarming Britain 42 Key measures 44 Inspire Secret Millionaire 48 Embarrassing Bodies and The Sex Education Show 50 Big Food Fight 52 Battlefront 54 Key measures 56 Chairman’s introduction Luke Johnson Chairman The media establishment is undergoing its most violent In recent months, Channel 4 has demonstrated its creative upheaval since Channel 4 was founded 26 years ago. The credentials in spades. With Slumdog Millionaire, Film4 won digital revolution, combined with a severe economic downturn, a spectacular array of Oscars and BAFTAs, and enjoyed a true means all commercial broadcasters are under significant international box office smash. -
The External Dimension of the Intra-EU Security: the CFSP, ESDP and JHA in the ENP Area CIDOB, Elisabets, 12, E - 08001 BARCELONA
The external dimension of the intra-EU security: The CFSP, ESDP and JHA in the ENP area CIDOB, Elisabets, 12, E - 08001 BARCELONA 22 February 2008 10.00 Welcome Esther Barbé, Francesc Morata and Jordi Vaquer 10.30 – Panel 1. 11.30 The implications of the 2007 Lisbon Treaty Chair: Esther Barbé (UAB) The CFSP/ESDP after the Treaty revision Franziska Bopp (University of Cologne) The JHA dimension after the Treaty revision Sergio Carrera (CEPS) Discussant: Blanca Vilà (UAB) Debate 11.30 – Coffee break 12.00 12.00 – Panel 2. 13.00 The CFSP/EU foreign policy Chair: Wolfgang Wessels (University of Cologne) Engaging the neighbours: the impact of the EU on Ukraine security policy Michal Natorski (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) Extending the European Security Community beyond EU enlargement? The case of the Euro-Mediterranean Civil Protection System Niklas Bremberg (Stockholm University) Discussant: Ignasi Guardans (European Parliament) Debate 13.00 – Lunch 15.00 15.00 – Panel 3. 16.00 The ESDP and other security related aspects Chair: Karen E. Smith (LSE) Stabilizing the Neighbourhood: the EU contribution to the Security Sector Reform in Georgia Òscar Pardo (University of Birmingham) Police reform in violent contexts: Palestinian and Congolese EU operations Maria A. Sabiote (IUEE) Discussant: Natividad Fernández Sola (Universidad de Zaragoza) Debate 16.00-16.30 Coffee break 16.30 – Panel 4. 17.30 The external dimension of Justice and Home Affairs Chair: Jordi Vaquer (CIDOB) 'What is really problematic about the 'externalisation' of EU JHA policy? An exploration of the critical debate, illustrated by the EU's fight against terrorism' Raphael Bossong (LSE) EU border management in the neighbourhood and the imperative of external cooperation in the field of justice and home affairs: practices, assumptions and effects. -
Impact Budgets Classic Engagement Activity Evaluation Toolbox
INDEX INTRODUCTION PLANNING IMPACT IN ACTION IMPACT DISTRIBUTION EVALUATING 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 INTRODUCTION PLANNING IMPACT IMPACT EVALUATING IN ACTION DISTRIBUTION Welcome Why vision & strategy matter Equipping for impact What is impact distribution? We love evaluation The power of film Defining your vision The role of film teams How commercial are impact films? What makes great evaluation Analysing the story environment Developing your strategy Meet the impact producer Types of distribution deals Embracing complexity How change happens Map the issue Consider your subjects Review distribution pathways Making your evaluation plan The challenge for filmmakers The 4 impact dynamics Writing impact budgets Classic engagement activity Evaluation toolbox Know thyself Draft your strategic plan Finding impact funders Impact distribution at work New tools for impact documentary Making impact partners Sign on the dotted line Wrapping up INDEX INTRODUCTION PLANNING IMPACT IN ACTION IMPACT DISTRIBUTION EVALUATING PDF • CL LE ICK AB A K BL IC E L P C Use the top D F • and side • F tabs to navigate D P C through! L E I L C B K A A K B C L I E L C P D F • Please don’t print me! IMPACTGUIDE.ORG Get the printable version INDEX INTRODUCTION PLANNING IMPACT IN ACTION IMPACT DISTRIBUTION EVALUATING A set of tools and guides designed to help all of us who are working with film make even greater impact than we do already. Brought to you by: Made possible by: britdoc.org fordfoundation.org | berthafoundation.org | sundance.org | knightfoundation.org -
Complete Dissertation Aug 1
Copyright by Courtney Elizabeth Brannon Donoghue 2011 The Dissertation Committee for Courtney Elizabeth Brannon Donoghue Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: “Lighting Up Screens Around the World”: Sony’s Local Language Production Strategy Meets Contemporary Brazilian and Spanish Cinema Committee: Janet Staiger, Co-Supervisor Joseph Straubhaar, Co-Supervisor Shanti Kumar Sonia Roncador Thomas Schatz “Lighting Up Screens Around the World”: Sony’s Local Language Production Strategy Meets Contemporary Brazilian and Spanish Cinema by Courtney Elizabeth Brannon Donoghue, B.A., M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2011 Dedication To Brian, Mom, Dad, and Jessica for your enduring love and support. Acknowledgements After spending seven years as a Master’s and Doctoral student in the Department of Radio-TV-Film, many people contributed and shaped my journey and this dissertation project. I am deeply grateful for the support and encouragement from my incredible friends, family, and community of academics and educators. Through the process of two degrees, you helped me to strengthen and develop my own academic voice. Thank you to my all-star committee—Janet Staiger, Joseph Straubhaar, Shanti Kumar, Thomas Schatz, and Sonia Roncador—for all of the time, energy, and patience you poured into this project. Each of you has had a major part in shaping me as a scholar, teacher, and student. Janet, it has been an honor and pleasure to learn from such a prolific media scholar. -
Competition Issues in the UK TV Advertising Trading Mechanism
Redacted version for publication Competition issues in the UK TV advertising trading mechanism ITV plc response to Ofcom Consultation of 10 June 2011 REDACTED VERSION FOR PUBLICATION REDACTIONS ARE MARKED BY A [] SYMBOL 3 August 2011 508948521 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. Introduction 1 2. Industry Background 1 3. No reasonable grounds for reference 2 4. Discretion not to refer 6 PART A - NO REASONABLE GROUNDS FOR SUSPECTING COMPETITIVE HARM 9 5. The market for TV advertising cannot be viewed in isolation 9 6. The TV advertising market is highly competitive 18 7. No evidence of harm to advertisers 21 8. No evidence of harm to consumers – as viewers 25 9. No evidence of harm to consumers – as purchasers of advertised goods 28 10. The current trading model 30 11. International comparison 40 PART B - OFCOM SHOULD IN ANY EVENT EXERCISE DISCRETION NOT TO REFER 46 12. Ofcom discretion 46 13. Scale of the problem 47 14. No reasonable chance that remedies will be available 48 15. Prolonged uncertainty 52 16. Disproportionate impact on advertising funded broadcasters 53 17. Timing is wholly inappropriate – market is changing anyway 56 18. Conclusions 61 Annex A – Cross reference table to responses to Ofcom questions 63 Annex B – The Growth of Digital Marketing 65 1. Introduction 65 2. Technological changes 66 3. Key features of consumer usage of online and mobile technology and information services 70 4. Key implications of these changes 76 Annex C – The Markets for Viewers and Content 84 1. The UK market for viewers is highly competitive 84 2. Viewers particularly value original UK TV content 85 3. -
Channel 4 and British Film: an Assessment Of
Channel 4 and British Film: An Assessment of Industrial and Cultural Impact, 1982-1998 Laura Mayne This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Portsmouth. September 2014 i Abstract This thesis is an historical investigation of Channel 4’s influence on the British film industry and on British film culture between 1982 and 1998. Combining archival research with interview testimony and secondary literature, this thesis presents the history of a broadcaster’s involvement in British film production, while also examining the cultural and industrial impact of this involvement over time. This study of the interdependence of film and television will aim to bring together aspects of what have hitherto been separate disciplinary fields, and as such will make an important contribution to film and television studies. In order to better understand this interdependence, this thesis will offer some original ideas about the relationship between film and television, examining the ways in which Channel 4’s funding methods led to new production practices. Aside from the important part the Channel played in funding (predominantly low-budget) films during periods when the industry was in decline and film finance was scarce, this partnership had profound effects on British cinema in the 1980s and 1990s. In exploring these effects, this thesis will look at the ways in which the film funding practices of the Channel changed the landscape of the film industry, offered opportunities to emerging new talent, altered perceptions of British film culture at home and abroad, fostered innovative aesthetic practices and brought new images of Britain to cinema and television screens. -
Bskyb / ITV Inquiry
ACQUISITION BY BRITISH SKY BROADCASTING GROUP PLC OF 17.9 PER CENT OF THE SHARES IN ITV PLC Report sent to Secretary of State (BERR) 14 December 2007 © Competition Commission 2007 Website: www.competition-commission.org.uk Members of the Competition Commission who conducted this inquiry Peter Freeman (Chairman of the Group) Christopher Bright Christopher Smallwood Professor Stephen Wilks Chief Executive and Secretary of the Competition Commission Martin Stanley The Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) has excluded from this published version of the report information which it considers should be excluded having regard to the three considerations set out in section 244 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (specified information: considerations relevant to disclosure). The omissions are indicated by . The versions of this report published on the BERR website on 20 December 2007, and reproduced on the CC website, gave the name of the company acquiring the 17.9 per cent stake in ITV plc as British Sky Broadcasting plc. The correct, full title of the acquiring company is British Sky Broadcasting Group plc. This corrected version of the report, with the full company name given on the title pages, paragraph 1 of the summary and in footnote 160, was posted on the BERR and CC websites on 11 January 2008. Acquisition by British Sky Broadcasting Group plc of 17.9 per cent of the shares in ITV plc Contents Page Summary............................................................................................................................... -
EU Digital Agenda a Trans-Atlantic Business Council and K&L Gates Symposium
The U.S. – EU Digital Agenda A Trans-Atlantic Business Council and K&L Gates Symposium December 10, 2018 K&L Gates, 1601 K Street, NW Washington, DC CONTENTS Agenda and Speakers ....................................................................................... Tab A Speaker Bios ...................................................................................................... Tab B Additional Materials ........................................................................................... Tab C K&L Gates Public Policy and Law Practice Group K&L Gates European Regulatory Practice Trans-Atlantic Business Council: What We Do Trans-Atlantic Business Council Meeting List Notes Pages ..................................................................................................... Tab D Agenda and Speakers The U.S. – EU Digital Agenda Time/Session: Topic/Speakers 1:00 p.m. - 1:05 p.m. Welcome Address Welcome Speaker Bart Gordon, Partner, K&L Gates, Washington, D.C. & Trans-Atlantic Business Council – Director, United States 1:05 p.m. - 1:30 p.m. EU Ambassador to the United States, David O’ Sullivan Keynote David O’Sullivan was appointed Ambassador and Head of the European Union Delegation to the United States in Washington, D.C. from November 2014. As Ambassador, Mr. O’Sullivan oversees the EU’s bilateral relationship with the U.S. including political, economic and commercial affairs. A long-time and distinguished EU official, he has served in a number of senior official posts in the European public service. Prior to his appointment as Ambassador, he was head of and established the EU's new diplomatic service, the ‘European External Action Service’. Other notable and senior positions within the European Commission include Director General for Trade (2005-2010); Secretary General of the European Commission (2000-2005); and Head of Commission President Prodi’s Cabinet (1999-2000). Before joining the Commission, he started his career with the Irish Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (1977-1979). -
Muxco Oxfordshire Limited
MuxCo Oxfordshire Limited An application to Ofcom for the Oxfordshire local DAB digital radio multiplex Part A – Public Section August 2007 Executive summary Please provide a summary of your application, of no more than four pages in length. Beliefs 1. MuxCo believes that digital radio broadcasting should be available to as many organisations as possible. In addition, a multiplex operator should offer a wide range of broadcast options, such as programme choice, variable bit rates and hours of broadcast, in order that DAB is as economical as possible to potential service providers. 2. MuxCo also believes that with the availability of more national capacity, it is financially prudent to encourage a range of local operators to broadcast. Local (and regional) services have the ability to attract a mixture of local and national revenue, giving them multiple opportunities to support their business. 3. MuxCo also believes that, where possible, existing analogue stations should be encouraged to become available digitally as soon as possible, allowing a consistent DAB focused message to be broadcast to existing radio listeners and to create strong cross-promotional opportunities for the platform. The Oxfordshire Marketplace 4. 2007 marks the millennium of the County of Oxfordshire. It also marks a turning point for its media. Commercial radio came to Oxfordshire relatively late, with Fox FM, the county’s first commercial service, launching in 1989. Whilst over the last 18 years additional locally focused services have launched serving the City of Oxford and Banbury, the current choice of commercial radio in the county still remains poor. 5. As a result, the BBC’s dominance has grown in recent years. -
Digital Terrestrial Radio for Australia
Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library Information, analysis and advice for the Parliament RESEARCH PAPER www.aph.gov.au/library 19 December, no. 18, 2008–09, ISSN 1834-9854 Going digital—digital terrestrial radio for Australia Dr Rhonda Jolly Social Policy Section Executive summary th • Since the early 20 century radio has been an important source of information and entertainment for people of various ages and backgrounds. • Almost every Australian home and car has at least one radio and most Australians listen to radio regularly. • The introduction of new radio technology—digital terrestrial radio—which can deliver a better listening experience for audiences, therefore has the potential to influence people’s lives significantly. • Digital radio in a variety of technological formats has been established in a number of countries for some years, but it is expected only to become a reality in Australia sometime in 2009. • Unlike the idea of digital television however, digital radio has not fully captured the imagination of audiences and in some markets there are suggestions that it is no longer relevant. • This paper provides a simple explanation of the major digital radio standards and a brief history of their development. It particularly examines the standard chosen for Australia, the Eureka 147 standard (known also as Digital Audio Broadcasting or DAB). • The paper also traces the development of digital radio policy in Australia and considers issues which may affect the future of the technology. Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Radio basics: AM and FM radio ................................................................................................. 3 How do AM and FM work? ................................................................................................... 3 How AM radio works .......................................................................................................