DOCSLIB.ORG

Scottish Sea Farms Ssf) Scapa Flow Ece Estimates 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scottish Sea Farms Ssf) Scapa Flow Ece Estimates 2017 SSF SCAPA FLOW ECE ESTIMATES 2017 SCOTTISH SEA FARMS SSF) SCAPA FLOW ECE ESTIMATES 2017 Report No. Scapa Flow 013.docx Anton Edwards April 2017 For: Anton Edwards CPhys, FInstP Scottish Sea Farms Ltd Duguid's Wark Laurel House Manse Road Laurel Hill Business Park Caputh Stirling Perthshire FK7 9JQ PH1 4JH 01738 710774 SCAPA FLOW 013.DOCX SSF SCAPA FLOW ECE ESTIMATES 2017 SUMMARY This report outlines the hydrography of the area of Scapa Flow in Orkney, so as to estimate the effect of existing and potential fish farms on local nutrient concentrations via the 'Equilibrium Concentration Enhancement' ( ECE) approach. Tidal and residual flows to Scapa Flow have been estimated by various methods (tide tables, direct observation and water budgets) to be sufficient to dilute the nitrogen released from existing consented sites and potential sites such that the likely ECE of nitrogen concentration is less than 10 µgN.litre-1. This estimate is based on a conservative assumption of 90% recirculation. The recirculation is expected to be much less than 90%, increasing the flushing of Scapa Flow and reducing the predicted overall ECE further to within the lower part of the range 1 to 10 µgN.litre-1. Local increases of ECE in the east of Scapa Flow may reach similar levels. Sites in the east of Scapa Flow such as Hunda, Roo Point and Westerbister are removed from the main flows but are well connected to them by an inferred eddy that circulates the water of Scapa Flow in a matter of days. This eddy exchanges with local coastal bays on a time scale of about a day so that the bays are very unlikely to develop local water characteristics different from the main body of Scapa Flow. An ECE of up to 10 µgN.litre-1 may be compared favourably with various relevant or regulatory standards: typical background concentrations a previous Environmental Quality Standard for available nitrogen of 168 gN.litre-1 OSPAR & Water Framework Directive Reference Conditions: in offshore waters such as these (salinity above 34), the DIN (Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen) reference value is 10M and the threshold 15M. Increases are therefore limited to 5 M (70 gN.l-1). In the cases and circumstances examined here, predicted ECE increases are therefore insignificant on the scale of the Scapa Flow water body. Displacement modelling shows that water in the neighbourhood of Hunda North that complies with Environmental Quality Standards is unlikely to reach local embayments in any significant quantity, implying that these embayments are at very low risk of EQS non-compliance. Comparison of displacements of water over regulatory time scales shows that waters from sites at Hunda North and Glimps Holm are very unlikely to meet with any local cumulative effect of raising local medicine concentrations to anything above EQS. Comparison of modelled depositional footprints at Hunda North and Glimps Holm shows that in this respect the interaction between the two sites is negligible. SCAPA FLOW 013.DOCX SSF SCAPA FLOW ECE ESTIMATES 2017 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 4 1.1 SCAPA FLOW REGULATORY ISSUES .................................................................................. 4 1.2 THE ECE APPROACH....................................................................................................... 4 2 PHYSICAL BACKGROUND ......................................................................................... 5 2.1 NON- TIDAL CIRCULATION AND THE FAIR ISLE CURRENT ...................................................... 5 2.2 GEOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 HYDROGRAPHY ............................................................................................................... 7 2.3.1 TIDAL RANGE ........................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3.2 THE TIDAL STREAM ATLAS ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.3.3 CURRENTS NEAR GRAEMSAY ................................................................................................................... 9 2.3.4 VOLUME FLOWS ....................................................................................................................................... 9 2.3.5 A TIDAL FLOW BUDGET .......................................................................................................................... 10 2.3.6 CURRENTS WITHIN SCAPA FLOW ............................................................................................................ 10 3 FARM SITES .............................................................................................................. 12 3.1 SITE DETAILS ................................................................................................................ 12 3.2 SITE CURRENTS ............................................................................................................ 13 3.2.1 BRING HEAD CURRENTS ........................................................................................................................ 13 3.2.2 TOYNESS CURRENT DATA ....................................................................................................................... 13 3.2.3 WESTERBISTER CURRENT DATA ............................................................................................................. 14 3.2.4 HUNDA NORTH ....................................................................................................................................... 14 3.2.5 ROO POINT ............................................................................................................................................ 15 3.2.6 ST MARGARET’ S HOPE .......................................................................................................................... 16 3.3 SCAPA FLOW CIRCULATION ........................................................................................... 16 3.3.1 THE INTERTEK MODEL ............................................................................................................................ 16 3.3.2 SITE CURRENT SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 17 3.3.3 FLUSHING TIME ....................................................................................................................................... 18 3.3.4 CONNECTION OF EAST SCAPA FLOW ...................................................................................................... 18 3.3.5 COASTAL EFFECTS IN THE EAST OF SCAPA FLOW ................................................................................... 19 4 PREDICTION OF NUTRIENT INCREASE .................................................................. 21 4.1 NUTRIENT INPUTS ......................................................................................................... 21 4.1.1 SSF SITE OPTIONS ................................................................................................................................. 21 4.2 CONCENTRATION ENHANCEMENT ................................................................................... 21 4.2.1 TIDAL FLOWS AND RECIRCULATION ......................................................................................................... 21 4.2.2 RESIDUAL FLOWS ................................................................................................................................... 21 4.3 ECE ESTIMATES ........................................................................................................... 21 4.3.1 ECE ESTIMATION IN SCAPA FLOW ......................................................................................................... 21 4.3.2 WORST CASE ECE AT MAXIMUM BIOMASS .............................................................................................. 22 4.3.3 LOCAL EFFECTS ..................................................................................................................................... 23 4.4 SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 23 5 EQS COMPLIANCE NEAR HUNDA NORTH ............................................................. 24 5.1 HUNDA NORTH ............................................................................................................. 24 5.2 GLIMPS HOLM ............................................................................................................... 25 6 DEPOSITIONAL FOOTPRINTS NEAR HUNDA NORTH ........................................... 28 REPORT NO: SCAPA FLOW 001 1 SCAPA FLOW 013.DOCX SSF SCAPA FLOW ECE ESTIMATES 2017 7 CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................................................... 29 7.1 ECE ............................................................................................................................ 29 7.2 EQS ............................................................................................................................ 29 7.3 DEPOSITIONAL FOOTPRINTS .......................................................................................... 29 8 REFERENCES ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scapa Flow Scale Site Environmental Description 2019
    Scapa Flow Scale Test Site – Environmental Description January 2019 Uncontrolled when printed Document History Revision Date Description Originated Reviewed Approved by by by 0.1 June 2010 Initial client accepted Xodus LF JN version of document Aurora 0.2 April 2011 Inclusion of baseline wildlife DC JN JN monitoring data 01 Dec 2013 First registered version DC JN JN 02 Jan 2019 Update of references and TJ CL CL document information Disclaimer In no event will the European Marine Energy Centre Ltd or its employees or agents, be liable to you or anyone else for any decision made or action taken in reliance on the information in this report or for any consequential, special or similar damages, even if advised of the possibility of such damages. While we have made every attempt to ensure that the information contained in the report has been obtained from reliable sources, neither the authors nor the European Marine Energy Centre Ltd accept any responsibility for and exclude all liability for damages and loss in connection with the use of the information or expressions of opinion that are contained in this report, including but not limited to any errors, inaccuracies, omissions and misleading or defamatory statements, whether direct or indirect or consequential. Whilst we believe the contents to be true and accurate as at the date of writing, we can give no assurances or warranty regarding the accuracy, currency or applicability of any of the content in relation to specific situations or particular circumstances. Title: Scapa Flow Scale Test
    [Show full text]
  • Results of the Seabird 2000 Census – Great Skua
    July 2011 THE DATA AND MAPS PRESENTED IN THESE PAGES WAS INITIALLY PUBLISHED IN SEABIRD POPULATIONS OF BRITAIN AND IRELAND: RESULTS OF THE SEABIRD 2000 CENSUS (1998-2002). The full citation for the above publication is:- P. Ian Mitchell, Stephen F. Newton, Norman Ratcliffe and Timothy E. Dunn (Eds.). 2004. Seabird Populations of Britain and Ireland: results of the Seabird 2000 census (1998-2002). Published by T and A.D. Poyser, London. More information on the seabirds of Britain and Ireland can be accessed via http://www.jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-1530. To find out more about JNCC visit http://www.jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-1729. Table 1a Numbers of breeding Great Skuas (AOT) in Scotland and Ireland 1969–2002. Administrative area Operation Seafarer SCR Census Seabird 2000 Percentage Percentage or country (1969–70) (1985–88) (1998–2002) change since change since Seafarer SCR Shetland 2,968 5,447 6,846 131% 26% Orkney 88 2,0001 2,209 2410% 10% Western Isles– 19 113 345 1716% 205% Comhairle nan eilean Caithness 0 2 5 150% Sutherland 4 82 216 5300% 163% Ross & Cromarty 0 1 8 700% Lochaber 0 0 2 Argyll & Bute 0 0 3 Scotland Total 3,079 7,645 9,634 213% 26% Co. Mayo 0 0 1 Ireland Total 0 0 1 Britain and Ireland Total 3,079 7,645 9,635 213% 26% Note 1 Extrapolated from a count of 1,652 AOT in 1982 (Meek et al., 1985) using previous trend data (Furness, 1986) to estimate numbers in 1986 (see Lloyd et al., 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • The Orkney Native Wildlife Project
    The Orkney Native Wildlife Project Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report June 2020 1 / 31 Orkney Native Wildlife Project Environmental Report 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Project Summary and Objectives ............................................................................. 4 1.2 Policy Context............................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Related Plans, Programmes and Strategies ............................................................ 4 2. SEA METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Topics within the scope of assessment .............................................................. 6 2.2 Assessment Approach .............................................................................................. 6 2.3 SEA Objectives .......................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Limitations to the Assessment ................................................................................. 8 3. ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROJECT AREA ............................. 8 3.1 Biodiversity, Flora and Fauna ................................................................................... 8 3.2 Population and Human Health .................................................................................. 9
    [Show full text]
  • Cruising the ISLANDS of ORKNEY
    Cruising THE ISLANDS OF ORKNEY his brief guide has been produced to help the cruising visitor create an enjoyable visit to TTour islands, it is by no means exhaustive and only mentions the main and generally obvious anchorages that can be found on charts. Some of the welcoming pubs, hotels and other attractions close to the harbour or mooring are suggested for your entertainment, however much more awaits to be explored afloat and many other delights can be discovered ashore. Each individual island that makes up the archipelago offers a different experience ashore and you should consult “Visit Orkney” and other local guides for information. Orkney waters, if treated with respect, should offer no worries for the experienced sailor and will present no greater problem than cruising elsewhere in the UK. Tides, although strong in some parts, are predictable and can be used to great advantage; passage making is a delight with the current in your favour but can present a challenge when against. The old cruising guides for Orkney waters preached doom for the seafarer who entered where “Dragons and Sea Serpents lie”. This hails from the days of little or no engine power aboard the average sailing vessel and the frequent lack of wind amongst tidal islands; admittedly a worrying combination when you’ve nothing but a scrap of canvas for power and a small anchor for brakes! Consult the charts, tidal guides and sailing directions and don’t be afraid to ask! You will find red “Visitor Mooring” buoys in various locations, these are removed annually over the winter and are well maintained and can cope with boats up to 20 tons (or more in settled weather).
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Birds
    SCOTTISH BIRDS THE JOURNAL OF THE SCOTTISH ORNITHOLOGISTS' CLUB Volume 7 No. 7 AUTUMN 1973 Price SOp SCOTTISH BIRD REPORT 1972 1974 SPECIAL INTEREST TOURS by PEREGRINE HOLIDAYS Directors : Ray Hodgkins, MA. (Oxon) MTAI and Patricia Hodgkins, MTAI. Each tour has been surveyed by one or both of the directors and / or chief guest lecturer; each tour is accompanied by an experienced tour manager (usually one of the directors) in addition to the guest lecturers. All Tours by Scheduled Air Services of International Air Transport Association Airlines such as British Airways, Olympic Airways and Air India. INDIA & NEPAL-Birds and Large Mammals-Sat. 16 February. 20 days. £460.00. A comprehensive tour of the Game Parks (and Monuments) planned after visits by John Gooders and Patricia and Ray Hodgkins. Includes a three-night stay at the outstandingly attractive Tiger Tops Jungle Lodge and National Park where there is as good a chance as any of seeing tigers in the really natural state. Birds & Animals--John Gooders B.Sc., Photography -Su Gooders, Administration-Patricia Hodgkins, MTAI. MAINLAND GREECE & PELOPONNESE-Sites & Flowers-15 days. £175.00. Now known as Dr Pinsent's tour this exhilarating interpretation of Ancient History by our own enthusiastic eponymous D. Phil is in its third successful year. Accompanied in 1974 by the charming young lady botanist who was on the 1973 tour it should both in experience and content be a vintage tour. Wed. 3 April. Sites & Museums-Dr John Pinsent, Flowers-Miss Gaye Dawson. CRETE-Bird and Flower Tours-15 days. £175.00. The Bird and Flower Tours of Crete have steadily increased in popularity since their inception in 1970 with the late Or David Lack, F.R.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Orkney Greylag Goose Survey Report 2015
    The abundance and distribution of British Greylag Geese in Orkney, August 2015 A report by the Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust to Scottish Natural Heritage Carl Mitchell 1, Alan Leitch 2, & Eric Meek 3 November 2015 1 The Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge, Gloucester, GL2 7BT 2 The Willows, Finstown, Orkney, KY17, 2EJ 3 Dashwood, 66 Main Street, Alford, Aberdeenshire, AB33 8AA 1 © The Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the copyright holder. This publication should be cited as: Mitchell, C., A.J. Leitch & E. Meek. 2015. The abundance and distribution of British Greylag Geese in Orkney, August 2015. Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Report, Slimbridge. 16pp. Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Slimbridge Gloucester GL2 7BT T 01453 891900 F 01453 890827 E [email protected] Reg. Charity no. 1030884 England & Wales, SC039410 Scotland 2 Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Methods ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Field counts ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stromness’ Main Attractions (See Map Overleaf): 14 New Library and Archive Offers A
    © DiskArt™ 1988 © D iskArt™ 1988 ©DiskArt™1988 © Di skArt™ 1988 © D iskArt™ 1988 © DiskA rt 1989 © DiskArt™ 1988 Some of Stromness’ Main Attractions (see map overleaf): 14 New Library and Archive offers a © D iskArt ™ 1988 wide range of fiction and non-fiction titles Welcome to English 15 Visitor Information Centre and Bus Terminal information on all things Orkney as well as audio books, music CDs and a from travel and accommodation to sites of interest, nature & environment and bright, well stocked children’s section. It much more. Busses arrive/depart from here and the NorthLink ferry to Mainland also has a reference collection, housed in Scotland departs here also. the George Mackay Brown Room. In the t: +44(0)1856 850716 w: visitscotland.com open: May-Aug 0900-1700 main library you will find an up-to-date selection of local and national newspapers and magazines which you can enjoy in Stromness 12 The Pier Arts Centre was established in 1979 to provide a home for an important collection of British fine art. As well as hosting a range of exhibitions our foyer seating area, or upstairs on our throughout the year the permanent collection includes works by major 20th comfy sofas, which offer a fantastic view Century artists Barbara Hepworth, Ben Nicholson and Alfred Wallis and others. over Stromness harbour. Free WiFi. Town guide for cruise passengers t: +44(0)1856 850209 w: pierartscentre.com e: [email protected] t: +44(0)1856 850907 Stromness lies in the west of Orkney, huddled around the sheltered open: Tues-Sat 1030-1700 & Jul-Aug Mondays 1030-1700 free entry e: [email protected] bay of Hamnavoe.
    [Show full text]
  • Wreck of the Edindoune (BF1118), Scapa Flow, Orkney. Final Report
    Wreck of the Edindoune (BF1118), Scapa Flow, Orkney. Final Report Submitted to: Historic Environment Scotland - Philip Robertson Contact: Kevin Heath SULA Diving Old Academy Stromness Orkney KW16 3AW Tel. 01856 850 285 E-mail. [email protected] Approved for release by M. Thomson (Director): Document history Version: State Prepared by: Date: 02 Final M. Thomson/K. Heath 26th March 2018 01 Draft M. Thomson/K. Heath 22nd March 2018 CONTENTS PAGE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………………………………………. ii SUMMARY………………......................................................................................................... iii 1. INTRODUCTION……………................................................................................................ 1 2. METHODS....................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Side scan sonar………………………………………………………………………………………………... 2 2.2 Diving……………………………………………………………………………………………….……………... 2 3. RESULTS.......................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Side scan sonar...................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Diving………………….................................................................................................. 3 4. DISCUSSION.................................................................................................................... 17 REFERENCES & BIBLIOGRAPHY..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cetaceans of Orkney
    CETACEANS OF ORKNEY As with the neighbouring Shetland Islands, the cetacean fauna (whales, dolphins, and porpoises) of Orkney is one of the richest in the UK. Favoured localities for cetacean sightings are off headlands and between sounds of islands in inshore areas, and over fishing banks in offshore regions. Although the majority of sightings records for several species occur on the west coast, this may relate to the easier opportunities to see animals from cliff-tops there. Much of the low-lying sand dune areas occur on the east side of Orkney making it more difficult to spot cetaceans from here. Since 1980, seventeen species of cetacean have been recorded along the coast or in nearshore waters (within 60 km of the coast). Of these, seven species (25% of the UK cetacean fauna) are present throughout the year or recorded annually as seasonal visitors. Of recent unusual cetacean sightings, single humpback whales have been seen on a number of occasions in summer. Sperm whales, although not annual, have been recorded several times in Orkney waters, mainly during winter months between October and March. Recently, six sperm whales remained in Scapa Flow between 22nd February and 25th March 1993, and eleven sperm whales stranded at Backaskaill Bay, Sanday on 7th December 1994, where they died the subsequent morning. CETACEAN SPECIES REGULARLY SIGHTED IN THE REGION Minke whale Balaenoptera acutorostrata The minke whale is the most frequently observed baleen whale species in the region. Most observations have been made along the west and south coasts of Orkney and in the Pentland Firth, but this may reflect the better cliff vantage points available there.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Identifying Additional Studies Required to Support Orkney –
    Orkney - Mainland Subsea Cable Link Report identifying additional studies required to support Orkney – Mainland subsea cable marine licence application Scottish and Southern Energy plc Assignment Number: A100413-S02 Document Number: A-100413-S02-REPT-001 Xodus Group The Auction House, 63A George St Edinburgh, UK, EH2 2JG T +44 (0)131 510 1010 E [email protected] www.xodusgroup.com Report identifying additional studies required to support marine licence application A100413-S02 Client: Scottish and Southern Energy plc Document Type: Report Document Number: A-100413-S02-REPT-001 A03 17/07/2018 Re-Issued for Use MB/JEH MM EH A02 17/07/2018 Re-Issued for Use MB/JEH MM EH A01 06/07/2018 Issued for Use MB/JEH KC EH R03 05/07/2018 Issued for Review MB/JEH KC EH R02 04/07/2018 Issued for Review MB/JEH KC EH R01 02/07/2018 Issued for Review MB KC EH Checked Approved Client Rev Date Description Issued By By By Approval Report identifying additional studies required to support marine licence application Assignment Number: A100413-S02 Document Number: A100413-S02-REPT-001 ii CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 Introduction 4 1.2 Background 4 1.3 Route Development 5 1.4 Workshop 9 1.5 Marine Survey 12 1.6 Cable Burial Risk Assessment 12 1.7 Project Description 12 1.8 Consent requirements 14 2 OVERVIEW OF KEY ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS 17 2.1 Overview of proposed cable route area 17 2.2 Protected sites 17 2.3 Physical environment and seabed conditions 23 2.4 Benthic and intertidal ecology 24 2.5 Fish ecology 26 2.6 Ornithology 29 2.7 Marine mammals 31
    [Show full text]
  • Liddle's Quarry, Orkney: a Resource Evaluation and Assessment of Past and Possible Future Uses of Extracted Stone Minerals & Waste Programme Open Report OR/12/070
    Liddle's Quarry, Orkney: a resource evaluation and assessment of past and possible future uses of extracted stone Minerals & Waste Programme Open Report OR/12/070 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MINERALS & WASTE PROGRAMME OPEN REPORT OR/12/070 Liddle's Quarry, Orkney: a resource evaluation and The National Grid and other assessment of past and possible Ordnance Survey data © Crown Copyright and database rights 2012. Ordnance Survey Licence future uses of extracted stone No. 100021290. Keywords Liddle's Quarry, Orkney Islands, Martin R Gillespie and Emily A Tracey resource evaluation, sandstone, building stone, dimension stone, Stromness, Kirkwall. Front cover Stockpiled sandstone blocks in Liddle’s Quarry. Bibliographical reference GILLESPIE, M R AND TRACEY, E A. 2012. Liddle's Quarry, Orkney: a resource evaluation and assessment of past and possible future uses of extracted stone. British Geological Survey Internal Report, OR/12/070. 39pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. Maps and diagrams in this book use topography based on Ordnance Survey mapping. © NERC 2012. All rights reserved Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 2012 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of our publications is available from BGS shops at British Geological Survey offices Nottingham, Edinburgh, London and Cardiff (Welsh publications only) see contact details below or shop online at www.geologyshop.com BGS Central Enquiries Desk Tel 0115 936 3143 Fax 0115 936 3276 The London Information Office also maintains a reference collection of BGS publications, including maps, for consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Norse High-Status Sites Around the Bay of Skaill, Sandwick, Orkney
    Late Norse high-status sites around the Bay of Skaill, Sandwick, Orkney James M. Irvine THE immediate hinterland of the Bay of Skaill in Orkney’s west Mainland is best known for the Neolithic village of Skara Brae, but it has a wealth of other early settlement and funerary sites, including at least two Iron Age brochs, while its Norse burial sites and ubiquitous place-names testify to its occupation during this period as well. Alas, the area was not mentioned in ‘Orkneyinga Saga’, and until recently no Norse settlement sites had been found, nor had much local history been published. However, there is now a growing corpus of multi-disciplinary research, notably two theses by Sarah Jane Gibbon née Grieve (1999, 2006), my own work on the Breckness estate (Irvine 2009a), and the major, on-going Birsay-Skaill Landscape Archaeology Project directed by David Griffiths of Oxford University (2005, 2006, 2011), coupled with the stimulus of the Research Agenda of The Heart of Neolithic Orkney World Heritage Site (Historic Scotland 2008). This prompts consideration of when and why four high-status sites in this area, shown in Figure 1 – St. Peter’s Kirk, the Castle of Snusgar, Stove, and Skaill House – may have developed and interacted during the late Norse period.1 The objective of this paper is not to pre-empt the important archaeological findings of Griffiths and his colleagues, but to introduce some hypotheses that will hopefully help stimulate further historical research and discussion on this important area and period. St. Peter’s Kirk This building has been restored by the Scottish Redundant Churches Trust and its modern history recorded (Irvine 2003), but little is known of the early history of the site, and no archaeological work has been undertaken.
    [Show full text]