15 Lc 108 0380 Hr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

15 LC 108 0380 House Resolution 957 By: Representatives Smyre of the 135th, Mosby of the 83rd, and Williams of the 168th A RESOLUTION 1 Honoring the life and memory of Marion Barry; and for other purposes. 2 WHEREAS, the State of Georgia mourns the loss of a great Civil Rights leader and public 3 servant with the passing of Marion Barry; and 4 WHEREAS, Marion Barry was born on March 6, 1936, in Itta Bena, Mississippi; and 5 WHEREAS, he earned a degree in chemistry from LeMoyne College in 1958, and while 6 earning his graduate degree in chemistry at Fisk University he organized a campus chapter 7 of the NAACP; and 8 WHEREAS, he was one of the student leaders who met with Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., in 9 1960 to establish the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, and he was elected that 10 organization's first national chairman; and 11 WHEREAS, Marion Barry was elected mayor of Washington, D.C., in 1978, 1982, 1986, 12 and 1994, and during his tenure, he transformed that city from a jurisdiction run by the 13 federal government into a self-governing city and a mecca for African American politicians, 14 government administrators, businessmen, and intellectuals; and 15 WHEREAS, he was a dynamic leader, a wonderful friend, and a strategic master who strove 16 to serve the citizens of the District of Columbia to the best of his ability; and 17 WHEREAS, a compassionate and generous man, Marion Barry will long be remembered for 18 his love of the District of Columbia, and this loyal public servant and friend will be missed 19 by all who had the great fortune of knowing him. H. R. 957 - 1 - 15 LC 108 0380 20 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES that 21 the members of this body join in honoring the life and memory of Marion Barry and express 22 their deepest and most sincere regret at his passing. 23 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of the House of Representatives is authorized 24 and directed to make appropriate copies of this resolution available for distribution to the 25 family of Marion Barry. H. R. 957 - 2 -.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Learning from History the Nashville Sit-In Campaign with Joanne Sheehan
Building a Culture of Peace Forum Learning From History The Nashville Sit-In Campaign with Joanne Sheehan Thursday, January 12, 2017 photo: James Garvin Ellis 7 to 9 pm (please arrive by 6:45 pm) Unitarian Universalist Church Free and 274 Pleasant Street, Concord NH 03301 Open to the Public Starting in September, 1959, the Rev. James Lawson began a series of workshops for African American college students and a few allies in Nashville to explore how Gandhian nonviolence could be applied to the struggle against racial segregation. Six months later, when other students in Greensboro, NC began a lunch counter sit-in, the Nashville group was ready. The sit- As the long-time New in movement launched the England Coordinator for Student Nonviolent Coordinating the War Resisters League, and as former Chair of War James Lawson Committee, which then played Photo: Joon Powell Resisters International, crucial roles in campaigns such Joanne Sheehan has decades as the Freedom Rides and Mississippi Freedom Summer. of experience in nonviolence training and education. Among those who attended Lawson nonviolence trainings She is co-author of WRI’s were students who would become significant leaders in the “Handbook for Nonviolent Civil Rights Movement, including Marion Barry, James Bevel, Campaigns.” Bernard Lafayette, John Lewis, Diane Nash, and C. T. Vivian. For more information please Fifty-six years later, Joanne Sheehan uses the Nashville contact LR Berger, 603 496 1056 Campaign to help people learn how to develop and participate in strategic nonviolent campaigns which are more The Building a Culture of Peace Forum is sponsored by Pace e than protests, and which call for different roles and diverse Bene/Campaign Nonviolence, contributions.
[Show full text]
Read Anna Chulak's Paper
HOW, AND TO WHAT EXTENT, DID THE NATURE OF CIVIL RIGHTS ACTIVISM PERPETUATE GENDER OPPRESSION AND HINDER THE WORK OF BLACK FEMALE ACTIVISTS IN THE MOVEMENT? Research Paper for History 344: US Social Movements Anna Chulack Chulack 1 Examining interracial relations is of great pertinence when analysing U.S. history since understanding how people of colour are perceived, as well as the difficulties that they face, today requires being aware of the long-lasting influences of slavery and segregation. The Civil Rights Movement is an important turning point in the history of the black freedom struggle, as it gave black people the chance to participate politically (through nonviolent protest) in a mass campaign to end Jim Crow. Sadly, however, the women of the movement have, for the most part, been overlooked or forgotten in the larger context of contemporary activism. At the time, they made up “a powerful, yet invisible network”i that has continued to be “invisible” today. This lack of recognition has occurred despite that black women oftentimes carried out essential activities in propelling the movement forward.ii We can attribute this injustice to gender oppression, which was prevalent in all aspects of the movement. The perpetuation of sexism by the black church, male activist attitudes and actions towards female activists, and the male-dominated hierarchy of many civil rights groups all worked to discourage the activism that women undertook, as well as disable women from being promoted to positions of official leadership in the movement. The role that the black church played in the Civil Rights Movement is important to assess in order to analyse why the oppression of black women within the church so greatly affected how women engaged with the movement and the roles that they took up.
[Show full text]
Finding Aid to the Historymakers ® Video Oral History with Reverend James Bevel
Finding Aid to The HistoryMakers ® Video Oral History with Reverend James Bevel Overview of the Collection Repository: The HistoryMakers®1900 S. Michigan Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60616 [email protected] www.thehistorymakers.com Creator: Bevel, James L. (James Luther), 1936- Title: The HistoryMakers® Video Oral History Interview with Reverend James Bevel, Dates: January 14, 2003 Bulk Dates: 2003 Physical 5 Betacame SP videocasettes (2:28:15). Description: Abstract: Civil rights activist and minister Reverend James Bevel (1936 - 2008 ) was the daring hero of 1963's Children's Crusade in Birmingham, Alabama. In addition to his activities during the Civil Rights Movement, Bevel were also an active force in interfaith dialogues, and several human and civil rights campaigns in the United States. Bevel was interviewed by The HistoryMakers® on January 14, 2003, in Chicago, Illinois. This collection is comprised of the original video footage of the interview. Identiﬁcation: A2003_004 Language: The interview and records are in English. Biographical Note by The HistoryMakers® Civil rights activist Reverend James Luther Bevel was born in Itta Bena, Mississippi, on October 19, 1936. After a stint in the services, Bevel was called to the ministry and enrolled in the American Baptist Theological Seminary in Nashville, Tennessee. While in the Seminary, Bevel joined the Nashville chapter of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), then led by the Reverend James Lawson. In 1960, Bevel and other black students trained by Lawson, including John Lewis, Dianne Nash, Marion Barry, and Bernard Lafayette, organized sit-ins against segregated lunch counters. Eventually Bevel and his colleagues won a hard- fought, nonviolent victory; soon after, as chairman of the Nashville student movement, Bevel participated in Freedom Rides to desegregate interstate travel and public accommodations throughout the South.
[Show full text]
Walter Edward Washington (1915-2003): a Photo Tribute
Washington History in the Classroom This article, © the Historical Society of Washington, D.C., is provided free of charge to educators, parents, and students engaged in remote learning activities. It has been chosen to complement the DC Public Schools curriculum during this time of sheltering at home in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. “Washington History magazine is an essential teaching tool,” says Bill Stevens, a D.C. public charter school teacher. “In the 19 years I’ve been teaching D.C. history to high school students, my scholars have used Washington History to investigate their neighborhoods, compete in National History Day, and write plays based on historical characters. They’ve grappled with concepts such as compensated emancipation, the 1919 riots, school integration, and the evolution of the built environment of Washington, D.C. I could not teach courses on Washington, D.C. Bill Stevens engages with his SEED Public Charter School history without Washington History.” students in the Historical Society’s Kiplinger Research Library, 2016. Washington History is the only scholarly journal devoted exclusively to the history of our nation’s capital. It succeeds the Records of the Columbia Historical Society, first published in 1897. Washington History is filled with scholarly articles, reviews, and a rich array of images and is written and edited by distinguished historians and journalists. Washington History authors explore D.C. from the earliest days of the city to 20 years ago, covering neighborhoods, heroes and she-roes, businesses, health, arts and culture, architecture, immigration, city planning, and compelling issues that unite us and divide us.
[Show full text]
Biographical Description for the Historymakers® Video Oral History with the Honorable Marion Barry
Biographical Description for The HistoryMakers® Video Oral History with The Honorable Marion Barry PERSON Barry, Marion, 1936- Alternative Names: The Honorable Marion Barry; Mayor Marion Barry Life Dates: March 6, 1936-November 23, 2014 Place of Birth: Itta Bena, Mississippi, USA Residence: Washington, DC Occupations: Mayor Biographical Note Marion Barry was born in Itta Bena, Mississippi on March 6, 1936. From an impoverished family, he went on to become a vigorous civil rights activist and served four terms as Mayor of the District of Columbia. Barry grew up in Memphis, where he attended Booker T. Washington High School. During the City's 1958 bus desegregation drive, Barry received his first taste of desegregation drive, Barry received his first taste of public confrontation and media notoriety. Subsequently, he abandoned his doctoral studies in Chemistry at the University of Tennessee to join the civil rights movement full-time. Barry was elected the first chairman of SNCC (Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee) and moved to Washington, D.C. in 1965 to open a local chapter. He never left. Barry quickly became a formidable politician in the nation's capital. In 1971, he was elected to serve on the city's first school board. Three years later, when Congress allowed local elections, Barry won a seat on the District of Columbia City Council. As the second elected mayor of Washington, D.C., Barry was known for building coalitions with marginalized populations, including African Americans, women and the LGBT community. Barry held that office for twelve years, until a misdemeanor drug conviction forced him to step down.
[Show full text]
Marion Barry, Part 2
The interview was conducted on March 24, 2011 by students from McComb High School and the Urban School of San Francisco as part of the Telling Their Stories Oral History Archives Project. Marion Barry, Part 2 00:00:00 Female Voice: Um, so what is your earliest memory? Marion Barry: Of what? Female Voice: As a child of anything? Marion Barry: Oh my god. I was born in the Delta of Mississippi in a town called Itta Bena, about 15 miles from Greenwood. About 35 miles from Greenville. 00:00:31 About 10 or 15 miles from Indianola, where B.B. King grew up. Uh, my mother and father were sharecroppers, that means that they bought the cotton seeds from some white man, planted the seeds, harvested the cotton, plowed the fields, and on the side we, uh, had a garden, and had pigs, hogs, and chicken. And [anything] to survival. Everything in the town was owned by white people. 00:01:11 Used to saying white man. The grocery store. The, uh, little clothing store. The gas station. So, we never had a car when I was growing up so it didn’t matter. And everything. And looking back upon it, I’m sure that the white man sold the seeds, the cotton seeds higher than what he paid for them and bought the cotton lower than he sold it for. 00:01:41 Which was exploitation at the highest. And I remember just growing up, um, my mother used to wake me up and drag me on a cotton sack.
[Show full text]
UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles “Free DC:” the Struggle For
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles “Free D.C.:” The Struggle for Civil, Political, and Human Rights in Washington, D.C., 1965-1979 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Selah Shalom Johnson 2015 © Copyright by Selah Shalom Johnson 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION “Free D.C.:” The Struggle for Civil, Political, and Human Rights in Washington, D.C., 1965-1979 by Selah Shalom Johnson Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Los Angeles, 2015 Professor Brenda Stevenson, Chair “Free D.C:” The Struggle for Civil, Political, and Human Rights in Washington, D.C., 1965-1979, illuminates one of the greatest political shortcomings in 20th century America, which was the failure to provide full political enfranchisement for the citizens of Washington, D.C. – the first major American city with a majority African-American population. This project centers on the Free D.C. Movement, a political crusade to fully enfranchise Washingtonians, through grassroots organizing and by pressuring the Federal government to address the political, social, and economic ills that plagued the nation’s capital for nearly a century. Washingtonians’ struggle for full political enfranchisement was one of the most significant goals and significant shortcomings of the 20th century. ii Washington has been an under-researched part of Civil Rights Movement history, even though the city had an instrumental role during this era. My project explores the “Free D.C.” Movement through the lens of residential segregation, employment, and education. I examine how the desire for institutional changes and improvements in these areas helped shape and direct the local movement, and consequently undermined Washington, D.C.
[Show full text]
Rise, Radicalization, Fall and Legacy of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC)
Intensive Program: Europe and the US in the 1960s Seminar: Coming Together or Coming Apart? Europe and the United States in the Sixties Date: Berlin, September 13, 2011 Session: 'Eyes on the Prize‘: The Struggle for Black Equality and Social Justice in the United States and in Germany, 1960-1972 Lecturer: PD Dr. Britta Waldschmidt-Nelson Presenter: Veronika Schäfer Rise, Radicalization, Fall and Legacy of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) 1 1 Rise February 1960: Black students hold first lunch counter sit-ins in Greensboro, NC; sit-ins spread throughout the country; a new organization is needed to give the protest more coordination April 15-17, 1960: SNCC is founded at Raleigh Conference at Shaw University (sponsored by the SCLC and mentored by Ella Baker), first chairman is Marion Barry SNCC is designed as a nonviolent, direct action organization, mostly sustained by students and with a group-centered leadership May 1961: SNCC, together with CORE, carries out the first Freedom Rides from Washington, D.C. to Jackson, MS under great personal risk In the following years SNCC is engaged in voter registration campaigns in the Deep South August 28, 1963: March on Washington; by then SNCC has become one of the major civil rights organizations In the summer of 1964, SNCC is part of the Mississippi Freedom Summer. Thousands of black and white students help to mobilize voters, form Freedom Schools and organize the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party (MFDP, an alternative to the all-white Democratic Party) 2 Radicalization
[Show full text]
MFDP Challenge to the Democratic Convention ~ Atlantic City, 1964
MFDP Challenge to the Democratic Convention Excerpted from “History & Timeline” The Plan As 1963 fades into history, 1964 dawns with Mississippi's white power-structure still continuing to deny Blacks the right to vote — no more than 5% of the state's Black population have been able to add their names to the voter rolls. And those few Blacks who are registered are shut out of the political processes. In many cases they face Klan violence, arrest by police on phony charges, and economic retaliation organized by the White Citizens Council if they actually try to cast ballots. Mississippi is a one-party state, all office-holders and political power-brokers are Democrats. The Democratic Party of Mississippi is the party of state legislator E.H. Hurst who murdered Herbert Lee in 1961. It is the party of delta plantation owner and U.S. Senator James O. Eastland who preaches that “Segregation is the law of nature, is the law of God.” It is the party of Governor Ross Barnett who incited whites to riot and kill when James Meredith Desegregated 'Ole Miss. They call themselves “Dixiecrats” — meaning that their true loyalty is to the southern social traditions of slavery and segregation and that they are loyal to the Democratic party only insofar as it defends white supremacy. In the first half of 1964, MFDP supporters attempt to participate in Democratic Party precinct, county, and state meetings, caucuses, and elections for committees and delegates. They are excluded. In April, the MFDP nominates Fannie Lou Hamer to run in the Democratic primary for Senator, and Victoria Gray, John Houston, and Rev.
[Show full text]
White House, Chocolate City: Reading DC in the Era of Marion Barry
White House, Chocolate City: Reading DC in the Era of Marion Barry Rachel Page Advised by Professor Austin Graham May 1, 2020 At the end of Ward Just’s 1994 novel Echo House, an elderly White man topples from his home’s grand staircase to his death.1 The man is Washington political power broker Axel Behl, and his death takes place at his own birthday party—and in front of none other than the president of the United States, who has just awarded him the prestigious Presidential Medal of Freedom. As his guests applaud him with champagne glasses in hand, Axel stares into empty space, his eyes “widening as if he had seen an apparition or some half-remembered figure from the distant and irrevocable past”—some ghost embedded, it seems, in the very walls of the house he was born and grew up in. Then he releases the brakes of his wheelchair, “slowly pressed both palms over his eyes and waited.”2 If Axel’s suicidal fall is positioned as a sort of flight from “the distant and irrevocable past,” it is equally significant as a gesture toward the future, or the lack thereof. In the final line of the novel, Axel’s adult son Alec registers his father’s death as a fatal blow to his own lifetime ambitions, musing that “This was the house he had inherited and the life he had made and he could not rid himself of either one; he guessed he had another thirty years to live.”3 But there is a fundamental paradox in Alec’s hopelessness: the Behl family’s future is foreclosed in the same breath as Axel is finally recognized as a figure of national importance, an achievement he has been working toward for a lifetime.
[Show full text]
51St | Episode 3: 'Take This Thing to the Streets'
51st | Episode 3: 'Take This Thing To The Streets' Mikaela Lefrak: [00:00] Previously on 51st, the D.C. statehood cause is getting more attention than ever before. We wanted to know what got us here, starting from the very beginning. Why did the founding fathers create D.C. the way they did? One of the reasons we found was a mutiny. Kenneth Bowling: This was the ancient horror of the army, the military overthrowing the republic. Mikaela Lefrak: [00:22] Out of fear, the founding fathers demanded that the new federal government have exclusive control over its home district, separate from all the states and the whims of their governors. But they never figured out one thing: how the residents of that district would vote. George Derek Musgrove: Because it doesn't provide a mechanism for D.C. residents to vote, in effect, [it] strips the local vote. Mikaela Lefrak: And then a D.C. official played fast and loose with the city's budget. Chris Myers Asch: Congress looks into it and says, woah, what have you done? Mikaela Lefrak: And Washingtonians lost their right to vote for nearly 100 years. [01:00] I'm Mikaela Lefrak. On this episode of 51st: the struggle for self-determination – how D.C. gained back the right to govern itself. Well, sorta gained it back. Mostly. Anyway, let's just dive in. Mikaela Lefrak: [01:15] Sorry, just getting situated in my shoe closet. Kojo Nnamdi: Oh, that's fine. Mikaela Lefrak: Thanks for bearing with me. Thank you so much for doing this.
[Show full text]
COUNCIL of the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA COMMITTEE of the WHOLE COMMITTEE REPORT 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 DRAFT
COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE REPORT 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004 DRAFT TO: All Councilmembers FROM: Chairman Phil Mendelson Committee of the Whole DATE: February 18, 2020 SUBJECT: Report on Bill 23-93, the “Marion S. Barry, Jr. Building Designation Act of 2020” The Committee of the Whole, to which Bill 23-93, the “Marion S. Barry, Jr. Building Designation Act of 2020” was referred, reports favorably thereon with amendments and recommends approval by the Council. CONTENTS I. Background and Need ................................................................1 II. Legislative Chronology ..............................................................4 III. Position of the Executive ...........................................................5 IV. Comments of Advisory Neighborhood Commissions ...............5 V. Summary of Testimony..............................................................5 VI. Impact on Existing Law .............................................................5 VII. Fiscal Impact ..............................................................................6 VIII. Section-by-Section Analysis ......................................................6 IX. Committee Action ......................................................................6 X. Attachments ...............................................................................6 I. BACKGROUND AND NEED On January 22, 2019, Bill 23-93, the “Marion S. Barry, Jr. Building Designation Act of 2020,”1 was introduced
[Show full text]