Final Report for Project PG0102 Ramorum 060911

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Report for Project PG0102 Ramorum 060911 Measuring the economic, environmental and ecosystem services value of herita ge gardens, heathland and woodland in the context of determining potential impacts from the regulated plant pathogens Phytophthora ramorum and Phytopthora kernoviae Prepared for: Defra Prepared by: ADAS UK Ltd in conjunction with CJC Consulting, Fera, and the London School of Economics Date: 17th June 2011 0936648 Project FFG0921: TEV at risk from P. ramorum and P. kernoviae Acknowledgements The project team would like to thank the time, effort and support provided by the Defra economists, Phil Cryle, Adam Bell, Meredith Ward and internal reviewers as well as the team at Fera including Alan Inman, Keith Walters, Claire Sansford, and Judith Turner. For assistance and provision of information to: Bruce Rothnie, Jennifer Mcvey, Pat Snowdon, Olly Stephenson, Justin Gilbert, Shona Cameron and Mark Broadmeadow (Forestry Commission), Suzanne Perry and Keith Kirby (Natural England) and Ian Wright (National Trust). Project team: Glyn Jones, Ben Drake (ADAS) – lead authors and contact Nigel Boatman, John Hughes, Kate Somerwill (Fera) Bob Crabtree (CJC Consulting) Susana Mourato (London School of Economics) Project FFG0921: TEV at risk from P. ramorum and P. kernoviae Executive summary Introduction The main aim of this research is to provide estimates of the total value to society of heritage gardens, heathland and woodland which may be under threat from impacts from Phytophthora ramorum (P. ramorum) and Phytophthora kernoviae (P. kernoviae) . The estimates provide an update to the figures used in the 2008 Impact Assessment. Background P. ramorum and P. kernoviae are exotic plant pathogens that have only recently been described in the last decade. P. ramorum was first confirmed in Great Britain in 2002, whilst P. kernoviae was first discovered here in 2003. Both species represent a threat to ornamental and wild shrubs and trees. Ornamental plants in heritage gardens can be seriously affected, as can susceptible trees in woodlands where leaf hosts (principally Rhododendron ponticum and more recently Japanese larch) occur and drive epidemics; heathland species, especially Vaccinium species are also considered at high risk. P. ramorum is present in various parts of Europe and is also reported as an introduced exotic plant pathogen in the USA; it is currently subject to EC emergency phytosanitary measures, which are under review. Following an EU-wide Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) the EC Standing Committee for Plant Health (SCPH) have provisionally agreed that P. ramorum should become listed as a harmful organism within the EC Plant Health Directive (2000/29/EC) with phytosanitary measures yet to be defined and agreed. P. kernoviae is recorded in Great Britain and in Eire, as well as in New Zealand. A UK PRA for P. kernoviae was also reviewed by the EC SCPH and there has been provisional agreement that P. kernoviae should be subject to emergency EU phytosanitary measures, again yet to be defined and agreed. There is a Phytophthora control programme that began in April 2009 with funding of £23.5 million over five years (this included some £4 million of existing funding for work on Phytophthora). The principal aim is the combat two pathogens to reduce pathogen inoculum to epidemiologically insignificant levels by removing sporulating host plants from high risk areas. This will reduce the risk of significant tree death and significant impact on heathlands within England and Wales. In August 2009 it was established that P. ramorum had begun to cause the death of a previously unknown host, Japanese larch trees. Since infected larch produces more inoculum than R. ponticum , the programme has redirected funding from clearance of infected R. ponticum to clearance of certain infected larch and additional aerial surveillance 1. A number of projects have been funded by Defra which have investigated the epidemiology of outbreaks caused by P. ramorum and P. kernoviae in England (PHO194, PHO195, PHO414, PHO308). These projects have established methodologies for the investigation of key aspects of the epidemiology and developed new quantitative diagnostic approaches for investigating persistence and dispersal. Studies to date have provided valuable epidemiological data, which have contributed to the development of pest risk analyses and pest eradication and containment strategies. Current work on developing disease management approaches P. ramorum and P. kernoviae on Vaccinium and other heathland species includes work on biodiversity impacts of Phytophthora, assuming different degrees of spread and host destruction, and the likely impact on ecosystem services. 1 The cost of larch clearance is met by the forest owner Project FFG0921: TEV at risk from P. ramorum and P. kernoviae The impacts of invasive alien species like P. ramorum and P. kernoviae are multifaceted. They can have consequences for the economy and human welfare directly (e.g. by damaging nursery stock) or indirectly (e.g. by impairing ecosystem services). Changes induced by invasive alien species can include the wholesale loss or alteration of goods (e.g. horticulture and forest products) and services (e.g. climate stabilisation and recreation). Terms of reference The aim was to produce an estimate of the total economic value at risk (TEV at risk ) from the diseases in the absence of continued control. This is not a marginal valuation of the value at risk, but is rather a valuation of the value at risk from a cessation of disease controls. The TEV estimate is composed of use and non-use value, with the former representing the value obtained by the public from direct enjoyment of heritage gardens, heathland and woodland, while the latter represents the value obtained by the public from knowing these habitats remain unchanged simply to have the option of future use, or for altruistic or bequest motives. This aim has given rise to a number of methodological issues. Normally the counterfactual to a scenario of no control would be the expected spread given the current controls in place. The scenarios are presented in ES Figure 1. Starting from the current period, the blue line shows a scenario whereby the diseases are contained to their current level of spread and the red line the scenario of spread with no controls. The dashed lines present potential spread with controls (these lines could be decreasing if the control is successful beyond containment). Spread with no control Possible spread Damage with control Current spread: “contained” in future Time ES Figure 1: TEV at risk However, given the inherent uncertainty involved in modelling the spread of these diseases it was decided by the project Steering Group that using a counterfactual with current controls would present two uncertain points for the valuation and that the project should instead seek to estimate the value as represented by the difference between the blue and red lines. Two distinct valuation exercises were undertaken to identify TEV at risk . The first undertook an assessment of the public’s willingness-to-visit (WTV) affected habitats Project FFG0921: TEV at risk from P. ramorum and P. kernoviae under a scenario of uncontrolled spread and their willingness to pay (WTP) to preserve habitat as described by the current spread situation. The second exercise considered the impact on the commercial forestry sector and incorporated both timber values and restocking effects (private costs) as well as carbon values (social costs). Method In order to estimate the TEV at risk it was necessary to first estimate the total area of the habitats that were at risk from uncontrolled spread. Spread maps were created by incorporating host maps for four susceptible species into a Metapopulation Epidemic Model (MPEM) developed by Cambridge University that is being funded separately as part of the Phytophthora programme. The spread maps and underlying data were used in both aspects of the valuation exercise. The spread maps were incorporated in a contingent valuation survey that included questions relating to WTV as well as WTP. The survey followed on from similar survey work undertaken for the Rural Economy and Land Use (RELU) project Memory and Prediction in Tree Disease Control. Unpublished results from this work suggested that changes in WTV would be minimal and that a survey should incorporate WTP questions. This is because basing estimates on changed WTV would underestimate the public values relating to the diseases and habitats by excluding the effect of the change in visit experience. To capture this, the survey included a number of photographs showing uninfected and infected plant species as well as maps showing the locations of the habitats. Respondents numbered a little below 1,000 and the survey was conducted online. This produced estimates of the publics’ WTP to prevent further spread and showed how visitation rates may or may not change at regional and national scales. The potential area of larch at risk from the diseases was used to estimate the timber and carbon values at risk using a discounted cash flow investment appraisal model. Results i) WTV and WTP As expected, the majority of responses were for visitation to remain unchanged. ES Figure 2 shows that there would be a net reduction in visitor rates and clearly this would be expected to have some impact on those sites with entrance fees. The net reduction is greater for national sites (those outside the respondents region). It may be that remedial changes to an infected site over time would negate even the small net reduction in visits. What is important though is that the change in visitor rates implied by the survey omits the effect of reduced enjoyment from continued visits to affected habitats. Heritage Gardens Heathland Woodland Change in Regional National Regional National Regional National Visitation More 105 65 60 47 65 44 The Same 620 654 681 690 692 700 Less 202 208 186 190 170 183 Project FFG0921: TEV at risk from P. ramorum and P.
Recommended publications
  • Methods and Work Profile
    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phytophthora Magnolia Phosphonate Poster ICPP Aug 08
    Steps towards integrated management of Forest Research Phytophthora kernoviae and P. ramorum on magnolias in British heritage gardens Sandra Denman, Susan Kirk and Alistair Whybrow Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, Surrey GU10 4LH, UK. Introduction Phytophthora kernoviae (Pk) and P. ramorum (Pr) are newly invasive Phytophthora species in Britain causing disfigurement and death of ornamental plants and trees in nurseries, native woodlands and gardens (Figures 1 and 2). Many of the gardens have heritage value and house collections of rare and exotic plants (e.g. the ‘National Magnolia Collection’). These serve as an important genetic resource but the gardens are also a significant source of tourist revenue. Some of the plant species that form the essential character of the gardens are primary foliar hosts for Pr and Pk and produce Figure 1. Shoot tip dieback and Figure 2. Bleeding stem lesions abundant inoculum when infected (e.g. rhododendrons, magnolia and pieris). Infected foliage leaf necrosis of R ponticum. on Fagus sylvatica. of these showcase plants is not only disfiguring but may be subjected to plant health measures of Route to determining whether infected deciduous magnolias can be freed from disease removal and destruction. By preventing new leaf infections and controlling existing ones, inoculum (1) Is the disease cycle broken over winter Yes No production and spread to trees and other plants is reduced. (2a) Has the main external source of (2b) Is the pathogen systemic inoculum been removed (e.g. rhododendron) (i.e. in the vascular system) No Do not progress Yes No until the answer is Yes To find out if some of these valuable plants could be ‘cured’ of established infections, aff ected Yes The plant will (3bi) Determine where the most probably pathogen overwinters/stays have to be latent in winter magnolias at two National Trust gardens were selected for study.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome Sequencing of Oomycete Isolates from Chile Supports the New Zealand Origin of Phytophthora Kernoviae and Makes Available the First Nothophytophthora Sp
    bs_bs_banner MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY (2019) 20(3), 423–431 DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12765 Short communication Genome sequencing of oomycete isolates from Chile supports the New Zealand origin of Phytophthora kernoviae and makes available the first Nothophytophthora sp. genome DAVID J. STUDHOLME1, PREETI PANDA2, EUGENIO SANFUENTES VON STOWASSER3, MARIELA GONZÁLEZ3, ROWENA HILL1,4, CHRISTINE SAMBLES1, MURRAY GRANT1,5, NARI M. WILLIAMS2 AND REBECCA L. MCDOUGAL2,* 1 Biosciences, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter, EX4 4QD, UK 2 Scion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute, Ltd.), Rotorua, 3015, New Zealand 3 Laboratorio de Patología Forestal, Facultad Ciencias Forestales y Centro de Biotecnología, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, 4070386, Chile 4 Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, TW9 3DS, UK 5 Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK SUMMARY Pests and diseases, together with climate change, present the Genome sequences were generated for six oomycete isolates biggest threats to forest health (Ramsfield et al., 2016; Trumbore collected from forests in Valdivia, Chile. Three of the isolates et al., 2015). The abundance and diversity of Phytophthora spe- were identified morphologically as Phytophthora kernoviae, cies known to be negatively impacting forest trees are increasing whereas two were similar to other clade 10 Phytophthora spe- (Hansen, 2015; Scott and Williams, 2014; Studholme et al., 2016). cies. One isolate was tentatively identified as Nothophytophthora The knowledge of Phytophthora species diversity within forests valdiviana based on nucleotide sequence similarity in the cy- is limited (Hansen et al., 2012), although momentum is building tochrome oxidase 1 gene. This is the first genome sequence for to characterize these populations phylogenetically and to better this recently described genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytophthora Kernoviae
    pk updated may 2010 v2:Layout 1 11/05/2010 10:26 Page 1 A threat to our woodlands, heathlands and historic gardens Phytophthora kernoviae Canker on the trunk of a mature beech tree, next to an infected rhododendron. Photo courtesy of Forest Research What is it and where is it found? Phytophthora kernoviae is a serious plant pathogen causing diseases of trees and shrubs in UK woodlands, heathlands and managed gardens. The pathogen was first discovered in October 2003 in historic woodland gardens in the heart of Cornwall, where both large rhododendron bushes and beech trees appeared to be dying from an unknown cause. Further investigations by Fera and Forest Research revealed a previously undescribed fungus-like organism. It has now been named Phytophthora kernoviae (derived from Kernow, an old Cornish name for Cornwall). Since it was first detected, there have been findings in woodlands, heathlands, gardens and a small number of nurseries principally in South West UK; however there have also been findings in Scotland, Ireland and New Zealand. Historic records suggest it has been in New Zealand since at least the 1950s. Why the concern and what are the hosts? P. kernoviae was first detected during official surveys for another plant pathogen, Phytophthora ramorum. P. kernoviae was causing extensive leaf blight and dieback PLANT DISEASE FACTSHEET of rhododendron and large necrotic, occasionally bleeding cankers on several beech trees. The pathogen is also causing damaging symptoms to bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) in heathland and woodland. Ornamental plants and trees in historic managed gardens have also become infected. The extent of the damage to trees, shrubs and heathland plants and the apparent speed of infection at the affected sites show that this pathogen is a serious threat to woodland, heathland and garden environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytophthora Ramorum and P. Kernoviae Diseases on Bilberry
    Phytophthora ramorum and Phytophthora kernoviae diseases on bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) A threat to our woodlands, heathlands and historic gardens Very early symptom showing a brown lesion developing around the leaf node What is it and where is it found? Phytophthora is a devastating fungus-like organism that causes damage to a wide range of trees and plants. Recently two species of Phytophthora – Phytophthora ramorum and Phytophthora kernoviae – have been causing damage to our environment. Why the concern? PLANT DISEASE FACTSHEET Initial findings of the disease were predominantly confined to ornamental plants in nurseries. Since then, findings in the wider environment have continued to spread across the UK after initially being concentrated in the South West. With a large and varied host range, if left unchecked they may change our landscape with the loss of many trees, shrubs and heathland plants. Where is it found? P. ramorum was first identified in 1995 causing the death of oak and tanoak trees in the coastal counties of California in the USA. It was first detected in the UK in 2002 in the nursery trade and has since spread to the wider environment including historic gardens, parks, woodlands and heathlands. The first finding of P. ramorum on the heathland plant Vaccinium myrtillus (bilberry/blaeberry) in the wild was confirmed in January 2009. More recently, in August 2009, the pathogen was identified on Japanese larch trees at sites in South West England. P. kernoviae was first discovered in 2003 causing severe damage to rhododendron and beech trees in Cornwall. The disease has been found in woodlands, gardens and a small number of nurseries with outbreaks mainly confined to the South West.
    [Show full text]
  • National Diagnostic Protocol Phytophthora Ramorum the Cause of Sudden Oak Death
    NDP 5 V2 - National Diagnostic Protocol for Phytophthora ramorum National Diagnostic Protocol Phytophthora ramorum The cause of Sudden Oak Death NDP 5 V2 NDP 5 V2 - National Diagnostic Protocol for Phytophthora ramorum © Commonwealth of Australia Ownership of intellectual property rights Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia (referred to as the Commonwealth). Creative Commons licence All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence, save for content supplied by third parties, logos and the Commonwealth Coat of Arms. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided you attribute the work. A summary of the licence terms is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en. The full licence terms are available from https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode. This publication (and any material sourced from it) should be attributed as: Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostics (2015). National Diagnostic Protocol for Phytophthora ramorum– NDP5 V2. (Eds. Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostics) Authors Smith, I and Cunnington J; Reviewers Williams, N, Hardy G, Meadows I and Toome M. ISBN 978- 0-9945112-9-4. CC BY 3.0. Cataloguing data Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostics (2015). National Diagnostic Protocol for Phytophthora ramorum– NDP5 V2. (Eds. Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostics) Authors Smith, I and Cunnington J; Reviewers Williams, N, Hardy G, Meadows I and Toome M.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota's Top 124 Terrestrial Invasive Plants and Pests
    Photo by RichardhdWebbWebb 0LQQHVRWD V7RS 7HUUHVWULDO,QYDVLYH 3ODQWVDQG3HVWV 3ULRULWLHVIRU5HVHDUFK Sciencebased solutions to protect Minnesota’s prairies, forests, wetlands, and agricultural resources Contents I. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 II. Prioritization Panel members ....................................................................................................... 4 III. Seventeen criteria, and their relative importance, to assess the threat a terrestrial invasive species poses to Minnesota ...................................................................................................................... 5 IV. Prioritized list of terrestrial invasive insects ................................................................................. 6 V. Prioritized list of terrestrial invasive plant pathogens .................................................................. 7 VI. Prioritized list of plants (weeds) ................................................................................................... 8 VII. Terrestrial invasive insects (alphabetically by common name): criteria ratings to determine threat to Minnesota. .................................................................................................................................... 9 VIII. Terrestrial invasive pathogens (alphabetically by disease among bacteria, fungi, nematodes, oomycetes, parasitic plants, and viruses): criteria ratings
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan
    Recovery Plan Phytophthora kernoviae Cause of Bleeding Trunk Cankers, Leaf Blight and Stem Dieback in Trees and Shrubs Updated January 2015 (Replaces November 2008 Version) Contents Page Executive Summary . 2 Contributors . 3 I. Introduction . 3 II. Symptoms . 6 III. Spread . 9 IV. Monitoring, Detection and Identification. 10 V. Response . 15 VI. USDA Pathogen Permits . 15 VII. Economic Impact and Compensation . 16 US Risk Map . 17 VIII. Mitigation and Disease Management . 19 IX. Infrastructure and Experts . 22 X. Research, Extension and Education Priorities . 24 References . 32 Web Resources . 37 Appendix . 38 This recovery plan is one of several disease-specific documents produced as part of the National Plant Disease Recovery System (NPDRS) called for in Homeland Security Presidential Directive Number 9 (HSPD-9). The purpose of the NPDRS is to ensure that the tools, infrastructure, communication networks, and capacity required to mitigate the impact of high consequence plant disease outbreaks are such that a reasonable level of crop production is maintained. Each disease-specific plan is intended to provide a brief primer on the disease, assess the status of critical recovery components, and identify disease management research, extension and education needs. These documents are not intended to be stand-alone documents that address all of the many and varied aspects of plant disease outbreaks and all of the decisions that must be taken to achieve effective response and recovery. They are, however, documents that will help USDA guide further efforts directed toward plant disease recovery. November, 2014 1 Executive Summary Phytophthora kernoviae, a recently described species of Phytophthora, is an invasive pathogen of forest trees and shrubs such as beech (Fagus sylvatica), rhododendron (Rhododendron ponticum), and Vaccinum myrtillus (bilberry) that has become established in woodlands, heathlands, parks and gardens in Cornwall, United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Phytophthora Species Detected in Disturbed and Undisturbed British Soils Using High-Throughput Sequencing Targeting ITS Rrna and COI Mtdna Regions
    Article Diversity of Phytophthora Species Detected in Disturbed and Undisturbed British Soils Using High-Throughput Sequencing Targeting ITS rRNA and COI mtDNA Regions Blanca B. Landa 1,†, Luis F. Arias-Giraldo 1,† ,Béatrice Henricot 2 , Miguel Montes-Borrego 1, Lucas A. Shuttleworth 3 and Ana Pérez-Sierra 4,* 1 Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Institute for Sustainable Agriculture, Alameda del Obispo s/n, 14004 Córdoba, Spain; [email protected] (B.B.L.); [email protected] (L.F.A.-G.); [email protected] (M.M.-B.) 2 Forest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin EH25 9SY, UK; [email protected] 3 NIAB EMR, East Malling, Kent ME19 6BJ, UK; [email protected] 4 Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, Surrey GU10 4LH, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Disease outbreaks caused by introduced Phytophthora species have been increasing in British forests and woodlands in recent years. A better knowledge of the Phytophthora communities already present in the UK is of great importance when developing management and mitigation strategies for these diseases. To do this, soils were sampled in “disturbed” sites, meaning sites frequently visited by the public, with recent and new plantings or soil disturbances versus more “natural” forest and Citation: Landa, B.B.; Arias-Giraldo, L.F.; Henricot, B.; Montes-Borrego, M.; woodland sites with little disturbance or management. Phytophthora diversity was assessed using Shuttleworth, L.A.; Pérez-Sierra, A. high-throughput Illumina sequencing targeting the widely accepted barcoding Internal Transcribed Diversity of Phytophthora Species Spacer 1 (ITS1) region of rRNA and comparing it with the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I Detected in Disturbed and (COI) gene.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Outbreaks of Phytophthora Ramorum in the U.K.—Current Status and Monitoring Update1
    Proceedings of the Sudden Oak Death Third Science Symposium Natural Outbreaks of Phytophthora ramorum in the U.K.—Current Status and 1 Monitoring Update Judith Turner,2 Philip Jennings,2 Gilli Humphries,2 Steve Parker,2 Sam McDonough,2 Jackie Stonehouse,2 David Lockley, 3 and David Slawson4 Abstract To date (February 2007) there have been 160 outbreaks of Phytophthora ramorum in gardens or woodlands in the U.K. Current EU policy requires that appropriate measures be taken to contain P. ramorum in such situations. In the U.K., the measures have either been aimed at eradication, through destruction of infected plants, or at containment to minimise the risk of P. ramorum being spread from the site to other areas. Of the 160 natural outbreaks recorded, 123 are ongoing, whilst the remainder are considered to have been eradicated as no further plant infections have been recorded, although in some cases the pathogen may still be detected as residual inoculum in soil or water. Monitoring of residual inoculum levels in soil/leaf debris has been carried out monthly for a period of up to three years in several sites in the south of England to investigate the extent of contamination within the gardens or woodlands and to quantify the effect of season on variation in inoculum levels. A number of the gardens were also found to be infected by P. kernoviae and in those situations the monitoring was extended to include both pathogens. A range of methods for monitoring levels of P. ramorum and P. kernoviae has been evaluated for routine use within the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiplex LAMP Detection of the Genus Phytophthora and Four Phytophthora Species P. Ramorum, P. Lateralis, P. Kernoviae, and P
    Microbes Environ. 36(2), 2021 https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/browse/jsme2 doi:10.1264/jsme2.ME21019 Multiplex LAMP Detection of the Genus Phytophthora and Four Phytophthora Species P. ramorum, P. lateralis, P. kernoviae, and P. nicotianae, with a Plant Internal Control Ayaka Hieno1*, Mingzhu Li2, Kayoko Otsubo1, Haruhisa Suga3, and Koji Kageyama1 1River Basin Research Center, Gifu University, 1–1 Yanagido, Gifu city, Gifu 501–1193, Japan; 2College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, China; and 3Life Science Research Center, Gifu University, 1–1 Yanagido, Gifu city, Gifu 501–1193, Japan (Received March 2, 2021—Accepted May 17, 2021—Published online June 10, 2021) Phytophthora species cause destructive plant diseases worldwide. All Phytophthora species, except for one, are listed as plant quarantine organisms in Japan. The exception, Phytophthora nicotianae is considered to be a domestic species. The injurious pests Phytophthora ramorum, Phytophthora lateralis, and Phytophthora kernoviae are invasive pathogens that cause tree mortality worldwide, mainly in the United States and the United Kingdom. To effectively control Phytophthora diseases, we established detection methods that utilize the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) of the genus Phytophthora and the four species P. ramorum, P. lateralis, P. kernoviae, and P. nicotianae. LAMP primers for P. ramorum, P. lateralis, and P. kernoviae were newly designed in the present study. Our multiplex assay includes the detection of plant DNA as an internal control. When the optimum ratio between plant and pathogen primers was used in multiplex LAMP assays, 1 pg to 100 fg of pathogen DNA was detected with similar sensitivity to that in simplex LAMP assays.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytophthora Kernoviae Brasier, Beales & S.A. Kirk 2005
    Phytophthora kernoviae Brasier, Beales & S.A. Kirk 2005 Synonyms Phytophthora kernovii Common Name(s) Disease: Beech bleeding canker, rhododendron dieback Pathogen: Phytophthora Taxon C, P. Taxon C, PTC, Pk Type of Pest Fungal-like organism Taxonomic Position Class: Oomycetes, Order: Pythiales, Family: Pythiaceae Figure 1. Necrotic bark and bleeding Reason for Inclusion in Manual lesions on a European Beech (Fagus Suggested by CAPS community, OPIS sylvatica) infected with P. kernoviae. Crown Copyright, Forestry Commission. A listing, national threat Background Information Phytophthora kernoviae was discovered in late 2003 during surveys of woodlands in Cornwall, south-west England, United Kingdom (UK) for the presence of another invasive pathogen, P. ramorum (Brasier et al., 2005). The species name is derived from the old name of modern Cornwall - Kernow, where the pathogen was first found. Molecular analysis shows that this species is distinct from other Phytophthora spp., with P. boehmeriae phylogenetically being the closest relative (Aleksandrov and Arbuzova, 2012). A possible origin in the southern hemisphere is hypothesized for P. kernoviae, and although present in New Zealand since at least 1953, it is not known if it is an endemic species (Ramsfield et al. 2009). In 2014, P. kernoviae was reported for the first time in South America (Chile) (Sanfuentes et al., 2014). Pest Description (As described in Brasier et al. (2005), and Dick and Parke (2012)). P. kernoviae is placed in Clade 9 with P. boehmeriae as its closest relative (Blair et al., 2008). Internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences of New Zealand isolates matched 812/813 base pairs with the UK reference isolate AY040661.
    [Show full text]