DOCSLIB.ORG

Phytophthora Ramorum and P. Kernoviae Diseases on Bilberry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phytophthora Ramorum and P. Kernoviae Diseases on Bilberry Phytophthora ramorum and Phytophthora kernoviae diseases on bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) A threat to our woodlands, heathlands and historic gardens Very early symptom showing a brown lesion developing around the leaf node What is it and where is it found? Phytophthora is a devastating fungus-like organism that causes damage to a wide range of trees and plants. Recently two species of Phytophthora – Phytophthora ramorum and Phytophthora kernoviae – have been causing damage to our environment. Why the concern? PLANT DISEASE FACTSHEET Initial findings of the disease were predominantly confined to ornamental plants in nurseries. Since then, findings in the wider environment have continued to spread across the UK after initially being concentrated in the South West. With a large and varied host range, if left unchecked they may change our landscape with the loss of many trees, shrubs and heathland plants. Where is it found? P. ramorum was first identified in 1995 causing the death of oak and tanoak trees in the coastal counties of California in the USA. It was first detected in the UK in 2002 in the nursery trade and has since spread to the wider environment including historic gardens, parks, woodlands and heathlands. The first finding of P. ramorum on the heathland plant Vaccinium myrtillus (bilberry/blaeberry) in the wild was confirmed in January 2009. More recently, in August 2009, the pathogen was identified on Japanese larch trees at sites in South West England. P. kernoviae was first discovered in 2003 causing severe damage to rhododendron and beech trees in Cornwall. The disease has been found in woodlands, gardens and a small number of nurseries with outbreaks mainly confined to the South West. In December 2007 P. kernoviae was confirmed on bilberry at a woodland site in Cornwall and in February 2008 in open heathland. Very early symptom showing a brown lesion Very early symptom development showing a dark developing around the leaf node brown/black, lesion. Lesions can develop at any point along the stem, not just at leaf nodes or buds Current situation There are currently 22 discrete outbreaks of P. ramorum or P. kernoviae on bilberry in England and Wales (as of 30/04/2012). Of these, there are 10 outbreaks of P. ramorum on bilberry nationally compared to 13 outbreaks of P. kernoviae (one site affected by both pathogens). P. ramorum is occurring predominantly on bilberry in woodland whereas P. kernoviae is more prevalent on bilberry in open heathland. Approximately 70% of the outbreaks on bilberry are in Cornwall, the majority of which are outbreaks of P. kernoviae in open heathland. Although the number of sites affected nationally is small, there is an upward trend since the first findings in 2007/08. Disease spread has been shown to be predominantly via localised splash dispersal but also in wind- driven rain, via run off or on footwear and vehicles. Evidence for long distance dispersal in the absence of rain is limited. Inoculum can also survive in soil, litter and in watercourses. Bilberry is highly susceptible to P. ramorum and P. kernoviae and symptoms can develop within 2 days of infection under warm conditions. In tests on susceptibility of a range of hosts to P. ramorum and P. kernoviae the orders of susceptibility were as follows: P. ramorum: viburnum > rhododendron > bilberry >pieris > camellia > magnolia P. kernoviae: pieris > bilberry > rhododendron > magnolia Monitoring work using bilberry bait plants to detect peak periods for sporulation and infection shows that bilberry is susceptible all year round and that infections will take place whenever there are prolonged conditions of high humidity. Temperature does not appear to be a limiting factor for P. ramorum but laboratory studies indicate that P. kernoviae may be more environmentally sensitive. Monitoring has shown that vaccinium plants are capable of supporting high levels of sporulation by P. kernoviae of over 1600 spores per cm2 of stem and that peaks in sporulation occur in the late autumn (November). This means that bilberry could be a primary source of spores and therefore further spread of the disease in the environment. Latest work at Fera on modelling local epidemics can describe current epidemic development and could be used for future prediction at a range of spatial scales from local to national. Latest outputs are based on measurements of when conducive weather has taken place and are being used to target when surveillance work should be undertaken. Disease management Timely management action is proven to limit disease spread and following evaluation in small scale trials, recommendations are now available for disease containment strategies for infected bilberry in both woodland and heathland environments. These strategies are supported by the availability of standard operating procedures for biosecurity and waste disposal (including composting), all backed up by extensive research. Recommended management actions are not available as full documents due to the need for some further work on logistics, but the options can be summarised as follows: Table 1. Summary of options for disease management of outbreaks on bilberry* Outbreak type Outbreak extent Disease management options Infected heathland Limited Spot treatment with an approved herbicide Infected heathland Widespread Burn and then spot treat with an approved herbicide Cut and remove material and then spot treat with an approved herbicide Infected woodland Limited Spot treatment with an approved herbicide Spot burn Cut and remove material Infected woodland Widespread Treatment with an approved herbicide Cut and remove material and then spot treat with an approved herbicide *Sourced from defra Research Project PH0601 (http://randd.defra) Advisory Information Phytophthora ramorum and Phytophthora kernoviae are quarantine diseases and Defra needs to be notified of any findings so action can be taken against them. If you suspect that such a pest or disease is present, you should report it immediately to your local Plant Health and Seeds Inspector (contact details below). Regional teams are working to identify and eradicate outbreaks of the diseases as part of a wide- reaching programme to manage the impact of Phytophthora ramorum and Phytophthora kernoviae in the UK. This programme is being run by the Food and Environment Research Agency (Fera), on behalf of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). If you discover any plants showing the symptoms illustrated in this leaflet: Make a note of the location Take a photograph if possible Don’t touch the plant or take a cutting Use the contact information below Telephone: 01904 465625 Email: [email protected] The Food and Environment Research Agency (Fera). October 2012 © Crown copyright 2012. The Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York Tel +44 (0)1904 462 000 E-mail [email protected] YO41 1LZ, UK Fax +44 (0)1904 462 111 www.defra.gov.uk/fera.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Research on the Epidemiology, Ecology and Management of Phytophthora Ramorum in California Forests1
    Research on the Epidemiology, Ecology and Management of Phytophthora ramorum in California Forests1 David M. Rizzo2 Key words: disease management, landscape ecology, invasive species Introduction The ultimate goal of Phytophthora ramorum research is to develop disease management strategies. To date, studies have been focused at three management levels: the individual tree, the landscape (or forest stand), and the regional to international scale (Garbelotto and others 2003, Rizzo and Garbelotto 2003, Rizzo and others 2005). I will focus my brief remarks on the forest landscape, possibly the most difficult level to implement disease control strategies (for a more comprehensive discussion see Rizzo and others 2005). From a research perspective, there are four non-exclusive areas that we must continue to focus on in order to facilitate P. ramorum management in forest stands: Put the impacts of sudden oak death in context with expected successional patterns and ecosystem processes within coastal forests For any P. ramorum management proposal to be successful in coastal California forests it must also be put into context with other management goals (e.g. timber extraction, wildlife) and threats (e.g., high fuel loads due to fire suppression, other invasive species) (Rizzo and others 2005). This requires continued study on the ecology of the invaded forests in addition to examining the biology of P. ramorum. This pathogen has invaded three broad forest types in California: mixed-evergreen forests dominated by coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia), mixed-evergreen forests dominated by tanoak (Lithocarpus densiflorus) and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), and coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) forests. With the possible exception of the coast redwood forest type, the ecology of many coastal mixed-evergreen forests has not been well characterized (Barbour and Minnich 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Methods and Work Profile
    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Alien Species Fact Sheet Phytophthora Ramorum
    NOBANIS –Invasive Alien Species Fact Sheet Phytophthora ramorum Author of this species fact sheet: Anna Poimala and Arja Lilja, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa Research Unit, PO Box 18, 01301 Vantaa, Finland; +358 40 801 5377 ; [email protected] Bibliographical reference – how to cite this fact sheet: Poimala, A. & Lilja, A. (2013): NOBANIS – Invasive Alien Species Fact Sheet – Phytophthora ramorum . – From: Online Database of the European Network on Invasive Alien Species – NOBANIS www.nobanis.org , Date of access x/x/201x. Species description Scientific names: Phytophthora ramorum Werres, De Cock & Man in`t Veld, Oomycetes, Chromalveolata. Synonyms: None. Common names: Twig and leaf blight (EU), Ramorum leaf blight (North America), Sudden Oak Death= SOD (North America), tamme-äkksurm (EE), maladie de l’encre des chênes rouges (FR), mort subite du chêne (FR), tammen äkkikuolema (FI), europæisk visneskimmel (DK, European isolates) / californisk visneskimmel (DK, North American isolates), Plötslig ekdöd (SE), Plötzliches eichensterben (DE), Nagła śmier ć d ębu (POL). Fig 1 . Sporangia of Phytophthora ramorum in soil extract water, photo by Arja Lilja. 1 Fig 2 . Branched dendroid-like hyphae of Phytophthora ramorum on the bottom of an agar plate, photo by Arja Lilja. Fig 3. Clamydospore of Phytophthora ramorum , photo by Arja Lilja. Species identification Phytophthora ramorum is a heterothallic species characterized by abundant production of chlamydospores and elongate, ellipsoid, deciduous sporangia. The mean sporangium length was 43.6 µm ± 5.3 with a range from 20-79 µm, and the mean sporangium width 23.9 µm ± 2.6 with a range from 12-40 µm in measurements done by Werres and Kaminski (2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Susceptibility of Larch, Hemlock, Sitka Spruce, and Douglas-Fir to Phytophthora Ramorum1
    Proceedings of the Sudden Oak Death Fifth Science Symposium Susceptibility of Larch, Hemlock, Sitka Spruce, and 1 Douglas-fir to Phytophthora ramorum Gary Chastagner,2 Kathy Riley,2 and Marianne Elliott2 Introduction The recent determination that Phytophthora ramorum is causing bleeding stem cankers on Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi (Lam.) Carrière) in the United Kingdom (Forestry Commission 2012, Webber et al. 2010), and that inoculum from this host appears to have resulted in disease and canker development on other conifers, including western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg.), Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco), grand fir (Abies grandis (Douglas ex D. Don) Lindl.), and Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carrière), potentially has profound implications for the timber industry and forests in the United States Pacific Northwest (PNW). A clearer understanding of the susceptibility of these conifers to P. ramorum is needed to assess the risk of this occurring in the PNW. Methods An experiment was conducted to examine the susceptibility of new growth on European (L. decidua Mill.), Japanese, eastern (L. laricina (Du Roi) K. Koch), and western larch (L. occidentalis Nutt.); western and eastern hemlock (T. canadensis (L.) Carrière); Sitka spruce; and a coastal seed source of Douglas-fir to three genotypes (NA1, NA2, and EU1) of P. ramorum in 2011. In 2012, a similar experiment was conducted using only the four larch species. Container-grown seedlings or saplings were used in all experiments. Five trees or branches of each species were inoculated with a single isolate of the three genotypes by spraying the foliage with a suspension of zoospores (105/ml).
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report for Project PG0102 Ramorum 060911
    Measuring the economic, environmental and ecosystem services value of herita ge gardens, heathland and woodland in the context of determining potential impacts from the regulated plant pathogens Phytophthora ramorum and Phytopthora kernoviae Prepared for: Defra Prepared by: ADAS UK Ltd in conjunction with CJC Consulting, Fera, and the London School of Economics Date: 17th June 2011 0936648 Project FFG0921: TEV at risk from P. ramorum and P. kernoviae Acknowledgements The project team would like to thank the time, effort and support provided by the Defra economists, Phil Cryle, Adam Bell, Meredith Ward and internal reviewers as well as the team at Fera including Alan Inman, Keith Walters, Claire Sansford, and Judith Turner. For assistance and provision of information to: Bruce Rothnie, Jennifer Mcvey, Pat Snowdon, Olly Stephenson, Justin Gilbert, Shona Cameron and Mark Broadmeadow (Forestry Commission), Suzanne Perry and Keith Kirby (Natural England) and Ian Wright (National Trust). Project team: Glyn Jones, Ben Drake (ADAS) – lead authors and contact Nigel Boatman, John Hughes, Kate Somerwill (Fera) Bob Crabtree (CJC Consulting) Susana Mourato (London School of Economics) Project FFG0921: TEV at risk from P. ramorum and P. kernoviae Executive summary Introduction The main aim of this research is to provide estimates of the total value to society of heritage gardens, heathland and woodland which may be under threat from impacts from Phytophthora ramorum (P. ramorum) and Phytophthora kernoviae (P. kernoviae) . The estimates provide an update to the figures used in the 2008 Impact Assessment. Background P. ramorum and P. kernoviae are exotic plant pathogens that have only recently been described in the last decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytophthora Ramorum
    USDA’s Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service Web site at www.csrees.usda. gov/Extension/index.html, or consult the blue pages of the telephone book under “U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cooperative State Research, Education, United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and Extension Service.” A directory of State plant regulatory officials is available on the National Plant Board Web site at www.nationalplantboard.org/ member/index.shtml. Phytophthora For more information and resources concerning ramorum: Figure 6—Employees from the Maryland Department P. ramorum, visit APHIS’ Web site at of Agriculture’s Plant Protection and Weed Management www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/ Stopping Division (left) and APHIS’ Plant Protection and Quarantine pram/index.shtml ■ program collect leaf samples from rhododendrons during a national survey for P. ramorum in nurseries. (APHIS photo by the Spread R. Anson Eaglin) Program Aid No. 1842 APHIS has enacted strict regulations in 15 coun- ties along the California and Oregon coastline be- The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits cause P. ramorum causes significant disease in those discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis forest environments. For nurseries, preventing the of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where introduction and establishment of the diseases applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental P. ramorum causes is the best defense. status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) How You Can Help Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, If you suspect that shrubs or other plants are infect- audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at ed with P.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytophthora Magnolia Phosphonate Poster ICPP Aug 08
    Steps towards integrated management of Forest Research Phytophthora kernoviae and P. ramorum on magnolias in British heritage gardens Sandra Denman, Susan Kirk and Alistair Whybrow Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, Surrey GU10 4LH, UK. Introduction Phytophthora kernoviae (Pk) and P. ramorum (Pr) are newly invasive Phytophthora species in Britain causing disfigurement and death of ornamental plants and trees in nurseries, native woodlands and gardens (Figures 1 and 2). Many of the gardens have heritage value and house collections of rare and exotic plants (e.g. the ‘National Magnolia Collection’). These serve as an important genetic resource but the gardens are also a significant source of tourist revenue. Some of the plant species that form the essential character of the gardens are primary foliar hosts for Pr and Pk and produce Figure 1. Shoot tip dieback and Figure 2. Bleeding stem lesions abundant inoculum when infected (e.g. rhododendrons, magnolia and pieris). Infected foliage leaf necrosis of R ponticum. on Fagus sylvatica. of these showcase plants is not only disfiguring but may be subjected to plant health measures of Route to determining whether infected deciduous magnolias can be freed from disease removal and destruction. By preventing new leaf infections and controlling existing ones, inoculum (1) Is the disease cycle broken over winter Yes No production and spread to trees and other plants is reduced. (2a) Has the main external source of (2b) Is the pathogen systemic inoculum been removed (e.g. rhododendron) (i.e. in the vascular system) No Do not progress Yes No until the answer is Yes To find out if some of these valuable plants could be ‘cured’ of established infections, aff ected Yes The plant will (3bi) Determine where the most probably pathogen overwinters/stays have to be latent in winter magnolias at two National Trust gardens were selected for study.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome Sequencing of Oomycete Isolates from Chile Supports the New Zealand Origin of Phytophthora Kernoviae and Makes Available the First Nothophytophthora Sp
    bs_bs_banner MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY (2019) 20(3), 423–431 DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12765 Short communication Genome sequencing of oomycete isolates from Chile supports the New Zealand origin of Phytophthora kernoviae and makes available the first Nothophytophthora sp. genome DAVID J. STUDHOLME1, PREETI PANDA2, EUGENIO SANFUENTES VON STOWASSER3, MARIELA GONZÁLEZ3, ROWENA HILL1,4, CHRISTINE SAMBLES1, MURRAY GRANT1,5, NARI M. WILLIAMS2 AND REBECCA L. MCDOUGAL2,* 1 Biosciences, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter, EX4 4QD, UK 2 Scion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute, Ltd.), Rotorua, 3015, New Zealand 3 Laboratorio de Patología Forestal, Facultad Ciencias Forestales y Centro de Biotecnología, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, 4070386, Chile 4 Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, TW9 3DS, UK 5 Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK SUMMARY Pests and diseases, together with climate change, present the Genome sequences were generated for six oomycete isolates biggest threats to forest health (Ramsfield et al., 2016; Trumbore collected from forests in Valdivia, Chile. Three of the isolates et al., 2015). The abundance and diversity of Phytophthora spe- were identified morphologically as Phytophthora kernoviae, cies known to be negatively impacting forest trees are increasing whereas two were similar to other clade 10 Phytophthora spe- (Hansen, 2015; Scott and Williams, 2014; Studholme et al., 2016). cies. One isolate was tentatively identified as Nothophytophthora The knowledge of Phytophthora species diversity within forests valdiviana based on nucleotide sequence similarity in the cy- is limited (Hansen et al., 2012), although momentum is building tochrome oxidase 1 gene. This is the first genome sequence for to characterize these populations phylogenetically and to better this recently described genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytophthora Kernoviae
    pk updated may 2010 v2:Layout 1 11/05/2010 10:26 Page 1 A threat to our woodlands, heathlands and historic gardens Phytophthora kernoviae Canker on the trunk of a mature beech tree, next to an infected rhododendron. Photo courtesy of Forest Research What is it and where is it found? Phytophthora kernoviae is a serious plant pathogen causing diseases of trees and shrubs in UK woodlands, heathlands and managed gardens. The pathogen was first discovered in October 2003 in historic woodland gardens in the heart of Cornwall, where both large rhododendron bushes and beech trees appeared to be dying from an unknown cause. Further investigations by Fera and Forest Research revealed a previously undescribed fungus-like organism. It has now been named Phytophthora kernoviae (derived from Kernow, an old Cornish name for Cornwall). Since it was first detected, there have been findings in woodlands, heathlands, gardens and a small number of nurseries principally in South West UK; however there have also been findings in Scotland, Ireland and New Zealand. Historic records suggest it has been in New Zealand since at least the 1950s. Why the concern and what are the hosts? P. kernoviae was first detected during official surveys for another plant pathogen, Phytophthora ramorum. P. kernoviae was causing extensive leaf blight and dieback PLANT DISEASE FACTSHEET of rhododendron and large necrotic, occasionally bleeding cankers on several beech trees. The pathogen is also causing damaging symptoms to bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) in heathland and woodland. Ornamental plants and trees in historic managed gardens have also become infected. The extent of the damage to trees, shrubs and heathland plants and the apparent speed of infection at the affected sites show that this pathogen is a serious threat to woodland, heathland and garden environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytophthora Ramorum: a Guide for Oregon Nurseries Hazel A
    OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION SERVICE Phytophthora Ramorum: A Guide for Oregon Nurseries Hazel A. Daniels, Jennifer Parke, Jay W. Pscheidt and Chris Benemann Summary ¾ Phytophthora ramorum became a federally quarantined pathogen in 2005. ¾ This pathogen causes the diseases known as ramorum leaf and twig blight, and sudden oak death. ¾ In the United States, the regulated host list includes more than 150 plant species in 37 genera. ¾ Repeated shipments of P. ramorum-infested plants by nurseries have resulted in spread of the disease. In 2019, for example, nationwide trace investigations were triggered due to the detection of P. ramorum positive plants in commerce. The infected plants originated from two nurseries in Washington state and Canada and were shipped to 18 states. Photo: Jennifer Parke, © Oregon State University ¾ Nurseries should be vigilant in monitoring plant Figure 1: Ramorum shoot dieback and leaf blight on Viburnum x material brought in from external sources. bodnantense ‘Dawn’. ¾ Management efforts in Pacific Northwest nurseries (Quercus spp.) in the San Francisco Bay Area were dying are focused on eradicating the pathogen when it is from a new disease, sudden oak death. The cause of both found and preventing new infections. sudden oak death and the nursery diseases was found to be Phytophthora ramorum, which was formally described ¾ If P. ramorum is found in your nursery, and you ship in 2001. material outside of Oregon, you will be required to sign a cooperative agreement with the United By 2001, P. ramorum had spread to 10 counties in States Department of Agriculture and Oregon coastal California. The pathogen was also detected Department of Agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • National Diagnostic Protocol Phytophthora Ramorum the Cause of Sudden Oak Death
    NDP 5 V2 - National Diagnostic Protocol for Phytophthora ramorum National Diagnostic Protocol Phytophthora ramorum The cause of Sudden Oak Death NDP 5 V2 NDP 5 V2 - National Diagnostic Protocol for Phytophthora ramorum © Commonwealth of Australia Ownership of intellectual property rights Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia (referred to as the Commonwealth). Creative Commons licence All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence, save for content supplied by third parties, logos and the Commonwealth Coat of Arms. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided you attribute the work. A summary of the licence terms is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en. The full licence terms are available from https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode. This publication (and any material sourced from it) should be attributed as: Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostics (2015). National Diagnostic Protocol for Phytophthora ramorum– NDP5 V2. (Eds. Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostics) Authors Smith, I and Cunnington J; Reviewers Williams, N, Hardy G, Meadows I and Toome M. ISBN 978- 0-9945112-9-4. CC BY 3.0. Cataloguing data Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostics (2015). National Diagnostic Protocol for Phytophthora ramorum– NDP5 V2. (Eds. Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostics) Authors Smith, I and Cunnington J; Reviewers Williams, N, Hardy G, Meadows I and Toome M.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota's Top 124 Terrestrial Invasive Plants and Pests
    Photo by RichardhdWebbWebb 0LQQHVRWD V7RS 7HUUHVWULDO,QYDVLYH 3ODQWVDQG3HVWV 3ULRULWLHVIRU5HVHDUFK Sciencebased solutions to protect Minnesota’s prairies, forests, wetlands, and agricultural resources Contents I. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 II. Prioritization Panel members ....................................................................................................... 4 III. Seventeen criteria, and their relative importance, to assess the threat a terrestrial invasive species poses to Minnesota ...................................................................................................................... 5 IV. Prioritized list of terrestrial invasive insects ................................................................................. 6 V. Prioritized list of terrestrial invasive plant pathogens .................................................................. 7 VI. Prioritized list of plants (weeds) ................................................................................................... 8 VII. Terrestrial invasive insects (alphabetically by common name): criteria ratings to determine threat to Minnesota. .................................................................................................................................... 9 VIII. Terrestrial invasive pathogens (alphabetically by disease among bacteria, fungi, nematodes, oomycetes, parasitic plants, and viruses): criteria ratings
    [Show full text]