DOCSLIB.ORG

Out of the Abyss Transforming EU Rules to Protect the Deep Sea

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Out of the Abyss Transforming EU Rules to Protect the Deep Sea Out of The Abyss Transforming EU rules to protect the deep sea The Pew environment Group The Pew Environment Group is the conservation arm of The Pew Charitable Trusts, a non-governmental organisation that works globally to establish pragmatic, science-based policies that protect our oceans, preserve our wildlands and promote clean energy. The Pew campaign to protect the deep sea The Pew campaign to protect the deep sea works to promote sustainable and responsible fishing polices for the deep sea – the largest and least understood environment on the planet. The campaign employs the best available science and economic data to understand how we might better protect fragile deep-sea habitats and highly vulnerable fish populations from unsustainable and highly destructive fishing. Karen Sack, Deputy Director, Pew Environment Group Andrea Kavanagh, Campaign Director, Protecting the Deep Sea Glynnis Roberts, Senior Associate, Protecting the Deep Sea Mark Gibson, Associate, Protecting the Deep Sea Elsa Lee, Associate, Protecting the Deep Sea Susanna Fuller, Consultant Matthew Gianni, Consultant Marta Marrero, Consultant Claire Nouvian, Consultant Acknowledgments This policy paper benefited tremendously from the initiative and analysis of Mark Gibson and expert knowledge of Matthew Gianni. A special thanks is owed to Professor Philip Weaver of the National Oceanography Centre, Southampton and Monica Verbeek and Carole White of Seas-At-Risk for their expertise and guidance. For more information, visit www.pewenvironment.org/deepsea This policy paper is intended for educational and informational purposes only. © The Pew Environment Group | Washington, D.C. | www.PewEnvironment.org January 2012 Cover Main background photo: instrumentation panel showing tracks of previous trawls in the northeast Atlantic, Greenpeace/Kate Davison. Round photos, left to right: orange roughy in the northeast Atlantic, JNCC/ Jaime Davies; coral sample of Lophelia pertusa, Inner Hebrides, North Atlantic, Greenpeace/Gavin Newman; electronic equipment onboard a trawler, PEG/ Corey Arnold. Transforming EU rules to protect the deep sea 01 Contents Executive summary 02 1. Introduction 04 2. The deep sea and the problem of deep-sea fishing 05 2.1 The deep sea 05 2.2 Deep-sea fishing 07 2.3 Environmental consequences 08 2.4 International call for action to protect the deep sea 11 3. The mismanagement of EU deep-sea fisheries 13 3.1 Deep-sea fishing in the northeast Atlantic 14 3.2 Impacts on species and ecosystems 15 3.3 Overview of EU deep-sea management 18 3.4 Evaluation of the EU deep-sea access regime 20 3.5 Evaluation of other EU fisheries management measures 22 4. Reforming the EU deep-sea access regime 24 Appendix I: Species listed in Annexes I and II of EU Regulation 2347/2002 28 Appendix II: Estimating the volume and value of the EU regional deep-sea landings 30 5. Endnotes 33 Acronyms CCAMLR Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic NEAFC North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission Marine Living Resources NPFC North Pacific Fisheries Commission CPUE catch per unit effort RFMO regional fisheries management organisation EEZ exclusive economic zone SPRFMO South Pacific Regional Fisheries FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the Management Organisation United Nations UNGA United Nations General Assembly ICES International Council for the Exploration of VME vulnerable marine ecosystem the Sea The Pew Environment Group Transforming EU rules to protect the deep sea 02SUmmary exeCutive summary As currently practised, deep-sea fishing has serious northeast Atlantic – home to some of the most and widespread environmental consequences heavily exploited deep-sea fish stocks – the EU for deep-sea fishing countries, the international is responsible for 75 percent of the total regional community, and ocean ecosystems. Studies reveal catch of deep-sea species.1 The EU is also a major that deep-sea fishing fleets around the world are player in high seas bottom fishing – an activity that causing significant harm to the ocean ecosystem frequently targets deep-sea species. The EU has an by damaging vulnerable marine ecosystems (VMEs) estimated 103 vessels conducting high seas bottom both within their Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) fishing, which is approximately one-third of the high and on the high seas. Such damage occurs through seas bottom fishing fleet globally.2 Given its size, bottom contact with fragile habitats and the the EU is uniquely poised to significantly improve overfishing of highly vulnerable deep-sea species, the sustainability of deep-sea fishing and reduce including orange roughy (Hoplostethus altanticus), negative impacts on VMEs. deep-sea sharks (e.g. Centrophorus spp.), and grenadiers (Coryphaenoides spp.). Many deep-sea Importantly, deep-sea fisheries are of little economic species are now believed to be depleted regionally, importance. Globally, deep-sea fisheries account for if not globally. just 2 to 4 percent of world landings.3 And in the EU, deep-sea fisheries account for just 1.2 percent of the The European Union’s (EU) deep-sea fishing EU’s northeast Atlantic catch and 1.3 percent of the fleet is one of the largest in the world. In the value of EU fishery product landings.4 ty R cience Pa cience s ASS -D e F i - i -UR aa O Lyman Peak, yakutat Seamount, Corner rise Seamount Group, depth 1,426m. This shows an area of the seamount that n ing/ was very heavily fished. most of the old coral was ground into rubble, some of the living gorgonians and sponges are L left but most are gone. Les Wat Les The Pew Environment Group Transforming EU rules to protect the deep sea 03SUmmary key reforms The Pew environment Group recommends 10 key reforms for eU deep-sea fisheries management. These reforms are offered on the basis of european Commission reports and communications, eU regulations, scientific studies, fisheries management best practice, international n O commitments made by the eU, and various publicly available documents and analyses. Deep-sea catch winched aboard bottom trawler, in 1. Incorporate a clear mandate for sustainable management. the Hatton Bank area of the North atlantic, 410 miles Davis eace/Kate P north-west of Ireland. een gR 2. Phase out the use of destructive fishing practices and gear. This policy paper summarises the current problems 3. Require that impact assessments are performed prior to in the regulation of deep-sea fisheries in the deep-sea fishing. northeast Atlantic by the EU, including weak catch and effort limits, lack of knowledge of the status 4. Implement area closures where significant adverse impacts of deep-sea fish stocks and the impact of fishing; on VMEs are known or are likely to occur. incomplete deep-sea species coverage; deficient monitoring and control measures; significant 5. Regulate all deep-sea fishing operations, defined as fishing data and reporting gaps; and a lack of sufficient below 400m, and the catch of all deep-sea species. measures to ensure sustainability and protect vulnerable deep-sea ecosystems such as cold-water 6. Regulate deep-sea catches, not just deep-sea landings. coral reefs from the harmful impacts of bottom fisheries. Various assessments have found that the 7. Reduce bycatch of deep-sea species and end discarding. EU’s deep-sea fisheries management regime for the northeast Atlantic is inadequate, poorly enforced, 8. Require that more detailed fishing plans are to be and inconsistent with EU and international submitted prior to deep-sea fishing. principles, agreements and legal obligations for the sustainable management of fisheries. As a 9. Effectively manage fishing capacity and effort in deep-sea result, leading scientific authorities have concluded fisheries. that the EU’s fisheries for deep-sea species in the northeast Atlantic are ‘outside safe biological limits’ 10. Improve reporting, monitoring, and compliance in deep-sea and that deep-sea fishing should be significantly fisheries. reduced or ended entirely.5 Globally, deep-sea fishing suffers from a lack of sustainable management practices. World landings are in a steady decline, and the high vulnerability of deep-sea fish stocks and deep-sea marine ecosystems is well documented. a single pass of a trawl net can destroy coral reefs, some of which may be as much as 8,500 years old The Pew Environment Group Transforming EU rules to protect the deep sea 04Section 1 introduCtion he European Union’s deep-sea fishing fleet for EU deep-sea fisheries are unavailable, leading is one of the largest in the world. In the scientific authorities have ruled that all of these northeast Atlantic – home to some of the deep-sea fisheries are ‘outside safe biological most heavily exploited deep-sea fish stocks limits’ and that fishing should be reduced or T 13 – the EU is responsible for 75 percent of the total ended entirely. That this recommendation has regional catch of deep-sea species.6 The EU is also not been followed is particularly concerning as a major player in high seas bottom fishing – an deep-sea species are relatively unimportant to the activity that frequently targets deep-sea species. EU economy – deep-sea species represent just The EU has an estimated 103 vessels conducting 1.3 percent of the total value of EU fishery product high seas bottom fishing, which is approximately landings and 1.2 percent of the EU’s entire northeast one-third of the high seas bottom fishing fleet Atlantic catch (see Appendix II). globally.7 Given its size, the EU is uniquely poised to significantly improve the sustainability of deep-sea Given its key role in deep-sea fisheries, the EU has fishing and reduce negative impacts on vulnerable an opportunity to demonstrate to other countries marine ecosystems (VMEs). that deep-sea fishing can be conducted responsibly and that it is following through on commitments Globally, deep-sea fishing suffers from a lack of made at the United Nations to manage deep- sustainable management practices.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Order BERYCIFORMES ANOPLOGASTRIDAE Fangtooths (Ogrefish) by J.A
    click for previous page 1178 Bony Fishes Order BERYCIFORMES ANOPLOGASTRIDAE Fangtooths (ogrefish) by J.A. Moore, Florida Atlantic University, USA iagnostic characters: Small (to about 160 mm standard length) beryciform fishes.Body short, deep, and Dcompressed, tapering to narrow peduncle. Head large (1/3 standard length). Eye smaller than snout length in adults, but larger than snout length in juveniles. Mouth very large and oblique, jaws extend be- hind eye in adults; 1 supramaxilla. Bands of villiform teeth in juveniles are replaced with large fangs on dentary and premaxilla in adults; vomer and palatines toothless. Deep sensory canals separated by ser- rated ridges; very large parietal and preopercular spines in juveniles of one species, all disappearing with age. Gill rakers as clusters of teeth on gill arch in adults (lath-like in juveniles). No true fin spines; single, long-based dorsal fin with 16 to 20 rays; anal fin very short-based with 7 to 9 soft rays; caudal fin emarginate; pectoral fins with 13 to 16 soft rays; pelvic fins with 7 soft rays. Scales small, non-overlapping, spinose, goblet-shaped in adults; lateral line an open groove partially bridged by scales; no enlarged ventral keel scutes. Colour: entirely dark brown or black in adults. Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Meso- to bathypelagic, at depths of 75 to 5 000 m. Carnivores, with juveniles feeding on mainly crustaceans and adults mainly on fishes. May sometimes swim in small groups. Uncommon deep-sea fishes of no commercial importance. Remarks: The family was revised recently by Kotlyar (1986) and contains 1 genus with 2 species throughout the tropical and temperate latitudes.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoplostethus Atlanticus Fisheries Relating to the South Pacific Regional Fishery Management Organisation
    SP-07-SWG-INF-09 Chile 13 May 2009 Information describing orange roughy Hoplostethus atlanticus fisheries relating to the South Pacific Regional Fishery Management Organisation WORKING DRAFT 04 MAY 2007 1. Overview ................................................................................................................ 2 2. Taxonomy .............................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Phylum ............................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Class ................................................................................................................. 3 2.3 Order ................................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Family .............................................................................................................. 3 2.5 Genus and species ............................................................................................ 3 2.6 Scientific synonyms ......................................................................................... 3 2.7 Common names ............................................................................................... 3 2.8 Molecular (DNA or biochemical) bar coding .................................................. 3 3. Species characteristics ........................................................................................... 4 3.1 Global distribution and depth range
    [Show full text]
  • Regime Shifts in the Anthropocene: Drivers, Risk, and Resilience
    Supplementary Information for Regime Shifts in the Anthropocene: drivers, risk, and resilience by Juan-Carlos Rocha, Garry D. Peterson & Reinette O. Biggs. This document presents a worked example of a regime shift. We first provide a synthesis of the regime shift dynamics and a causal loop diagram (CLD). We then compare the resulting CLD with other regime shifts to make explicit the role of direct and indirect drivers. For each regime shift analyses in this study we did a similar literature synthesis and CLD which are available in the regime shift database. A longer version of this working example and CLDs can be found at www.regimeshifts.org. 1. Kelps transitions Summary. Kelp forests are marine coastal ecosystems located in shallow areas where large macroalgae ecologically engineer the environment to produce a coastal marine environmental substantially different from the same area without kelp. Kelp forests can undergo a regime shift to turf-forming algae or urchin barrens. These shift leads to loss of habitat and ecological complexity. Shifts to turf algae are related to nutrient input, while shifts to urchin barrens are related to trophic-level changes. The consequent loss of habitat complexity may affect commercially important fisheries. Managerial options include restoring biodiversity and installing wastewater treatment plants in coastal zones. Kelps are marine coastal ecosystems dominated by macroalgae typically found in temperate areas. This group of species form submarine forests with three or four layers, which provides different habitats to a variety of species. These forests maintain important industries like lobster and rockfish fisheries, the chemical industry with products to be used in e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Forage Fish Management Plan
    Oregon Forage Fish Management Plan November 19, 2016 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Marine Resources Program 2040 SE Marine Science Drive Newport, OR 97365 (541) 867-4741 http://www.dfw.state.or.us/MRP/ Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Purpose and Need ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Federal action to protect Forage Fish (2016)............................................................................................ 7 The Oregon Marine Fisheries Management Plan Framework .................................................................. 7 Relationship to Other State Policies ......................................................................................................... 7 Public Process Developing this Plan .......................................................................................................... 8 How this Document is Organized .............................................................................................................. 8 A. Resource Analysis ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • Average Relative Density of Fish Species and Functional Groups in the Newfoundland and Labrador Shelves Bioregion from 1981-2017
    Average Relative Density of Fish Species and Functional Groups in the Newfoundland and Labrador Shelves Bioregion from 1981-2017 Nadine J. Wells, Christina Pretty, Margaret Warren, Emilie Novaczek and Mariano Koen-Alonso Science Branch, Newfoundland and Labrador Region Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre, 80 East White Hills Road, St. John’s, NL, Canada A1C 5X1 2021 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 3427 1 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Technical reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which is not normally appropriate for primary literature. Technical reports are directed primarily toward a worldwide audience and have an international distribution. No restriction is placed on subject matter and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, namely, fisheries and aquatic sciences. Technical reports may be cited as full publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in the data base Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts. Technical reports are produced regionally but are numbered nationally. Requests for individual reports will be filled by the issuing establishment listed on the front cover and title page. Numbers 1-456 in this series were issued as Technical Reports of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 457-714 were issued as Department of the Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service, Research and Development Directorate Technical Reports. Numbers 715-924 were issued as Department of Fisheries and Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service Technical Reports. The current series name was changed with report number 925.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Stable States and Regime Shifts - Environmental Science - Oxford Bibliographies 3/30/18, 10:15 AM
    Multiple Stable States and Regime Shifts - Environmental Science - Oxford Bibliographies 3/30/18, 10:15 AM Multiple Stable States and Regime Shifts James Heffernan, Xiaoli Dong, Anna Braswell LAST MODIFIED: 28 MARCH 2018 DOI: 10.1093/OBO/9780199363445-0095 Introduction Why do ecological systems (populations, communities, and ecosystems) change suddenly in response to seemingly gradual environmental change, or fail to recover from large disturbances? Why do ecological systems in seemingly similar settings exhibit markedly different ecological structure and patterns of change over time? The theory of multiple stable states in ecological systems provides one potential explanation for such observations. In ecological systems with multiple stable states (or equilibria), two or more configurations of an ecosystem are self-maintaining under a given set of conditions because of feedbacks among biota or between biota and the physical and chemical environment. The resulting multiple different states may occur as different types or compositions of vegetation or animal communities; as different densities, biomass, and spatial arrangement; and as distinct abiotic environments created by the distinct ecological communities. Alternative states are maintained by the combined effects of positive (or amplifying) feedbacks and negative (or stabilizing feedbacks). While stabilizing feedbacks reinforce each state, positive feedbacks are what allow two or more states to be stable. Thresholds between states arise from the interaction of these positive and negative feedbacks, and define the basins of attraction of the alternative states. These feedbacks and thresholds may operate over whole ecosystems or give rise to self-organized spatial structure. The combined effect of these feedbacks is also what gives rise to ecological resilience, which is the capacity of ecological systems to absorb environmental perturbations while maintaining their basic structure and function.
    [Show full text]
  • Cascading Regime Shifts Within and Across Scales Juan C
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/364620; this version posted July 7, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Cascading regime shifts within and across scales Juan C. Rocha1,2, Garry Peterson1, Örjan Bodin1, Simon A. Levin3 1Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Kräftriket 2B, 10691 Stockholm 2Beijer Institute, Swedish Royal Academy of Sciences, Lilla Frescativägen 4A, 104 05 Stockholm 3Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, 106A Guyot Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544-1003 Abstract Regime shifts are large, abrupt and persistent critical transitions in the function and structure of systems (1, 2 ). Yet it is largely unknown how these transitions will interact, whether the occurrence of one will increase the likelihood of another, or simply correlate at distant places. Here we explore two types of cascading effects: domino effects create one-way dependencies, while hidden feedbacks produce two-way interactions; and compare them with the control case of driver sharing which can induce correlations. Using 30 regime shifts described as networks, we show that 45% of the pair-wise combinations of regime shifts present at least one plausible structural interdependence. Driver sharing is more common in aquatic systems, while hidden feedbacks are more commonly found in terrestrial and Earth systems tipping points. The likelihood of cascading effects depends on cross-scale interactions, but differs for each cascading effect type. Regime shifts should not be studied in isolation: instead, methods and data collection should account for potential teleconnections.
    [Show full text]
  • Regime Shifts Database Template for Capturing Generic Examples of Regime Shifts
    Appendix 2. Regime Shifts Database Template for capturing generic examples of regime shifts. A slightly modified version for capturing detailed case studies is also available at www.regimeshifts.org. REGIME SHIFTS DATABASE GENERIC REGIME SHIFTS TEMPLATE GREEN = Free text, paragraph style BLUE = Free text, brief keywords or phrases RED = Choose from predefined keyword options 1. Regime shift name Short, succinct name for the type of regime shift. Try to include a brief reference to both regimes (e.g. clear to turbid water). The regime shift types should be generalized descriptions of the dynamics of a particular kind of RS as observed over multiple case studies, rather than a description of the dynamics that occurred in a particular case (e.g. Lake Eutrophication in Lake Mendota). However, for large-scale regional or global RS the case may be unique (e.g. collapse of the thermohaline circulation) and can then be described in unique terms. 2. Main Contributors Names of those who primarily contributed to the text. 3. Other Contributors Names of others who contributed to and reviewed the text. 4. Summary/Abstract of regime shift (max 150 words) Brief, clear, easy-to-understand summary of the regime shift: the alternate regimes, the key drivers (social and ecological), and key impacts. This section is intended to be understandable by lay persons and the general public. Limit the summary to 1 paragraph and do not include references. This section should be written last, once you have finalized all the other sections. 5. Alternate regimes (max 300 words) This section describes the different regimes that may exist in the system.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Regime Shift' Concept in Addressing Social-Ecological Change
    Using the ‘regime shift’ concept in addressing social-ecological change Christian A. Kull*a, b Christoph Kuefferc,d David M. Richardsond Ana Sofia Vaze Joana R. Vicentee João Pradinho Honradoe This is an authors’ preprint version of the article published in the journal Geographical Research. The final, definitive version is available through Wiley’s Online Library at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-5871.12267/full Citation: Kull, C.A., Kueffer, C., Richardson, D.M., Vaz, A.S., Vicente, J.R., Honrado, J.P., (2017). Using the ‘regime shift’ concept in addressing social-ecological change. Geographical Research. 56 (1): 26-41. DOI: 10.1111/1745-5871.12267. *Corresponding author. [email protected] a Institute of Geography and Sustainability, University of Lausanne, Switzerland b Centre for Geography and Environmental Science, Monash University, Australia c Institute of Integrative Biology, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Switzerland d Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, South Africa e Research Network in Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology (InBIO/CIBIO) & Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Portugal ABSTRACT ‘Regime shift’ has emerged as a key concept in the environmental sciences. The concept has roots in complexity science and its ecological applications and is increasingly applied to intertwined social and ecological phenomena. Yet, what exactly is a regime shift? We explore this question at three nested levels. First, we propose a broad, contingent, multi-perspective epistemological basis for the concept, seeking to build bridges between its complexity theory origins and critiques from science studies, political ecology, and environmental history.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2000 Part A
    23 American Currents Vol. 26, No. 4 What’s in a Name? . The Olympic Mudminnow Mike Kelly U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Western Washington Fisheries Resource Office, 2625 Parkmont Lane, Olympia, WA 98502, [email protected] o be safe, I checked the phone book for any Mr. or Why should you get excited about the Olympic mud- Mrs. Mudminnows that I might offend with this minnow? Oh boy, where do I start? statement, so here it goes: “Mudminnow” is a Reason #1 There are only five species in the mudminnow T really bad name. Come on, if your name is Mike family (Umbridae) worldwide. Compare that to the 66 Mudminnow, for example, you’re gonna get beat up. You’ll species in the family Salmonidae, which includes the salmon, have to really earn your respect. (Note: I’m not advocating trout, and char. Or compare that to the number of species in violence against people with funny names, but hey, kids can the family Cyprinidae, which includes the carps and true be cruel.) minnows. (I can’t give you an actual number because it would People have scoffed when I’ve tried to talk seriously be a tremendous waste of tax payers’ dollars for me to sit here about Washington’s special little native Chehalis River fish. and count up this list I have. Let’s just say there are thousands This fish gets very little respect, and I think it’s mostly because of species in the family Cyprinidae.) So you can see that of its name. If it were named “Olympic monstertruckfish” mudminnows are not your run-of-the-mill fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Recycled Fish Sculpture (.PDF)
    Recycled Fish Sculpture Name:__________ Fish: are a paraphyletic group of organisms that consist of all gill-bearing aquatic vertebrate animals that lack limbs with digits. At 32,000 species, fish exhibit greater species diversity than any other group of vertebrates. Sculpture: is three-dimensional artwork created by shaping or combining hard materials—typically stone such as marble—or metal, glass, or wood. Softer ("plastic") materials can also be used, such as clay, textiles, plastics, polymers and softer metals. They may be assembled such as by welding or gluing or by firing, molded or cast. Researched Photo Source: Alaskan Rainbow STEP ONE: CHOOSE one fish from the attached Fish Names list. Trout STEP TWO: RESEARCH on-line and complete the attached K/U Fish Research Sheet. STEP THREE: DRAW 3 conceptual sketches with colour pencil crayons of possible visual images that represent your researched fish. STEP FOUR: Once your fish designs are approved by the teacher, DRAW a representational outline of your fish on the 18 x24 and then add VALUE and COLOUR . CONSIDER: Individual shapes and forms for the various parts you will cut out of recycled pop aluminum cans (such as individual scales, gills, fins etc.) STEP FIVE: CUT OUT using scissors the various individual sections of your chosen fish from recycled pop aluminum cans. OVERLAY them on top of your 18 x 24 Representational Outline 18 x 24 Drawing representational drawing to judge the shape and size of each piece. STEP SIX: Once you have cut out all your shapes and forms, GLUE the various pieces together with a glue gun.
    [Show full text]