A Semi-Annual Publication of the Philem N Foundation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
a semi-annual publication of the Fall 2006 philem n foundation Volume 2, Issue 1 JUNG HISTORY: A Semi-Annual Publication of the CONTENTS Philemon Foundation, Volume 2, Issue 1 FIGURES OF TIME AND MEANING IN JUNG’S INTERPRETATION The Philemon Foundation was founded at the end of OF DREAMS : PAGE TWO 2003, and since this time, has made critical contribu - Michael Whan tions to a number of ongoing projects preparing for publication the still unpublished works of C. G. Jung. ON THE METHOD OF DREAM The Foundation is grateful to its donors who have INTERPRETATION : PAGE SIX made this work possible. Jung History, which will C. G. Jung appear semi-annually, will provide accounts of some of the ongoing research sup ported by the Philemon Foundation and other news. In addition to schol - ars funded by the Philemon Foundation, Jung History will present reports of significant historical research and publications in the field. In recent years, an increasing amount of new historical research on C. G. Jung has been undertaken, based on the study of hitherto unknown primary materials. However, the publication of such research has been widely dis - persed, which has led to the desirability of a publica - tion to gather together such work and make it better known. Jung History sets out to fill this need. Jung History will be freely distributed to donors, collabo - rating institutions, and interested readers. Jung History will also be available for download at www.philemonfoundation.org. For further infor - mation concerning the Philemon Foundation and to receive a copy of Jung History , please send an e-mail to info @philemonfoundation.org. The Editors — Michael Whan, Editor Sonu Shamdasani, Editor Stephen A. Martin, Consulting Editor Eugene Taylor, Consulting Editor Copyright for the articles in Jung History remains with the authors. Cover image: Enchanted Boy II, Ferdinand Hodler, 1894, courtesy of Gottfried Keller Foundation. : children’s dreams : page one PREVIEW C. G. JUNG, CHILDREN’S DREAMS: NOTES FROM THE PSYCHOLOGICAL SEMINAR GIVEN FROM 1936 TO 1940 Between 1936 and 1940, C. G. Jung presented a psychological seminar n four semesters at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. These alternated between seminars on children’s dreams and on historical work on dreams. For many years notes of these semesters were only available in a privately printed mimeographed edition (notes of just two C. G. Jung at Eranos, photographer unknown. of the semesters were translated into English). Walter Verlag finally published the complete notes in an edition of 678 pages edited by Lorenz Jung and Maria Meyer-Gross entitled, Kinderträume, in 1987. The Philemon Foundation commissioned an English edition of this volume that has been newly translated by Ernst Falzeder in collaboration with Tony Woolfson. Falzeder has also added additional editorial footnotes to the work. For the English edition, the seminars will be published in two thematic volumes: the first volume will contain the seminars dealing with children’s dreams, and the second volume will contain those dealing with his - torical works on dreams. Princeton University Press will publish the first volume. This seminar contains Jung’s most extensive work on the psychology of childhood and has yet to receive the attention it deserves in the English-speaking world. This issue of Jung History is dedicated to an illustrated ver - sion of the seminar of 25 October 1938 in which Jung gave an exposition of the principles of dream interpretation. We would like to thank Niedieck Linder AG and the Erbengemeinschaft C. G. Jung for permission to publish it here. Sonu Shamdasani General Editor : jung history 2 :1 FIGURES OF TIME AND MEANING IN JUNG’S INTERPRETATION OF DREAMS MICHAEL WHAN ung’s discussion, ‘On the ality analogically. These temporal differences of which method of dream interpre - interpretation needs to remain mindful, can be tation’, forms part of his sem - described in terms of the forms of causality-effi - inar on remembered chil - cient, formal, and final-and that acausality, which dren’s dreams. As remember - Jung came to identify in his thinking on synchronic - ing, in the context of the ity: the ‘depth of the personality’ as a kind of psy - Seminar, comes from the time chic ‘implicate order’ that dreams itself into being. of adulthood, from where Jung speaks of the dream as a product of ‘a part of childhood dreams are recalled, the unconscious, standing alien in time.’ From Jung cautions us about the Jung’s perspective then, the dream stands estranged jdifficulties of interpretation: in relation to the timing of interpretation. ‘This poses a difficulty as, in the Nevertheless, such an experience of estrangement case of remembered dreams, we can no longer ask the allows the interpreter to remain sensitive to the children themselves, but have to resort to other dream, respectful of difference, a variant of means in order to enrich the dream material and to Keatsean ‘negative capability’. So that, even though understand the dream.’ His concern with the prob - an interpretation reaches across towards the dream’s lem of memory nevertheless underpins all conscious meaning, it holds itself apart: engaging, yet at the work with dreams. For all dreams to which we same time self-effacing (abstaining from self-impo - bring our hermeneutic labours are remembered dreams. sition). Put otherwise, the dream’s ‘standing alien in Wakeful consciousness, the daytime time’ belongs to the dissociability of the ego, must necessarily work with the psyche. Interpretive method does not memory of a dream; what, say, I recall so much overcome this dissociation, as a dream from last night. Thus but attempts to keep the tension, to dream interpretation has to reckon transform unconscious dissociation with the difficulty of memory, that is into differentiation; that is, becoming to say, of time, timing, and human aware of dissociation. The dream’s temporality. Implicit in Jung’s caution standing alien in time means that dis - are at least two modes of temporality: sociation cannot be interpreted away. oneiric time and that of biography. Hence, Jung warns against a mono - For Jung, these modes of time belong lithic theory of dreams, against that to different psychic ‘levels’. The collapse of tension between dream dreams of early childhood ‘are and hermeneutic. Interpretive method dreamed out of the depth of the per - seeks to overcome unawareness of Chalice of Becoming, Odilon Redon, 1894, sonality.’ The interpretation of private collection dissociation by holding the tension, remembered childhood (and all) dreams attempts to the apartness, of the dream’s otherness. Interpretive speak across the gulf, the difficulty, between these mastery checks itself, its omniscience, through hold - different temporal experiences: oneiric and biogra - ing to the dream’s mystery. phical. The interpretation of dreams requires us to Jung holds the dream to be a ‘natural phenome - cultivate sensitivity to the connections and differ - non’; as he elsewhere puts it, ‘A dream walks in like ences between these temporalities, between dream an animal.’ 1 Eschewing a monolithic theory of and interpretation. dreams, Jung pays heed to an ecology of dreaming, When Jung speaks of such early dreams as ‘an granting a whole ‘bio-diversity’ or kinds of dream. anticipation of the later destiny’ of the dreamer, he But positing the dream as a ‘natural phenomenon’ begins to draw out the different forms of fateful engenders a difficulty, namely, ‘the difficult task of psychic movement interweaving between the dream translating natural processes into psychical lan - and interpretation. As we shall see, to best approach guage’. The ‘meaning’ of dreams belongs to the sub - the ‘destiny’ implicate in the dream, ‘method’ ( methodos, jectivity of the interpreter: ‘Any meaning...comes ‘way’) must serve the dream’s meaning or intention - from us’. The ‘between’ of nature and the dream : children’s dreams : page three Full Moon, Paul Klee, 1927, private collection cultures of depth psychology requires a process of of movement. According to Jung, ‘something [is] translation. But translation from what into what? Jung going on in the realm of the unconscious with the recognizes the profound uncertainty, including the notion of time, that time comes apart a little in the question of temperament (the ‘personal equation’) unconscious, i.e., that the unconscious always in interpreting any dream. Therefore he proposes remains beside the passing of time, and perceives that the interpreter needs to investigate dreams by things that do not yet exist. In the unconscious way of a ‘dream series’. By such means, Jung suggests, everything is already there from the beginning...The we may offset to some extent the interpreter’s sub - unconscious does not care about time or the causal jective bias, namely, the underlying complexes both interrelation of things. This can be observed in of the individual hermenaut and the dream psychol - dream series. The series does not form a chronolog - ogy by which he or she approaches the dream. The ical, consecutive order in the sense of our temporal dream series is meaningfully connected, the underly - order. That is why it is so difficult to tell what ing ‘monologue’, ‘as if’, says Jung, the dreams were comes first and what later. If one tried to character - trying to give ‘expression to a central content from ize the nature of dreams, one could say that they do ever varying angles.’ Thus, having carefully, atten - not form a chronological series...we rather have to tively, followed the dream series, ‘the whole suppose an unrecognizable center from which describes a certain line.’ dreams emanate’. Hence, the work of interpretation Interestingly, what unfolds as a ‘dream series’, a as ‘translation’ raises the problematic of time, linear, narrative ‘line’, Jung indicates at the depth of 1 C.G.Jung, Dream Analysis: Notes of the Seminar Given In 1928–30, ed., W.