DOCSLIB.ORG

The Peloponnesian Wars

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Peloponnesian Wars Birth of reason:: The Golden Age of Greece Marshall Hi gh School Mr. Cline Western Civi lization I:: Ancient Foundations Unit Three GA * The Golden Age of Greece (479-336 B.C.) • The Peloponnesian Wars • The Persian defeat ushered in the Golden Age of Greece, and was perhaps the most significant point in the development of a unique Western Civilization. • If the Persians had won, the western world, instead of looking to Greece for learning, erudition, and culture, may have looked further east to Persia, and thus had a much more eastern outlook on civilization. • In the half century after the Battle of Salamis, Athens enjoyed a meteoric rise in power and prestige, becoming the premier naval power of the eastern Mediterranean and a military rival of even Sparta. • Athens also emerged as the leader of the Delian League, a group of poleis pledged to continue the war against Persia. • As the leader of the league, Athens controlled its funds and resources • This allowed the Athenians to make their polis, in the words of Pericles, “the school of Hellas. * The Golden Age of Greece (479-336 B.C.) • The Peloponnesian Wars • The reforms of Cleisthenes encouraged further experiments in Greek democracy, including the selection of major officeholders by lot. • Only one key position was now filled by traditional voting; the office of Strategos, or general. • Because a man could be elected Strategos year after year, the office became the focus for Athens’ most talented and ambitious public figures • Themistocles had been Strategos, as had been Cimon, who led the Delian League to stunning victories over Persia in the 470’s and 460’s. • However, Cimon also turned the league against members who tried to opt out, suppressing their revolts by force of arms and turning the league more and more into an instrument of Athenian policy. • Cimon’s military success made him the most powerful politician in Athens. * The Golden Age of Greece (479-336 B.C.) • The Peloponnesian Wars • By the 460’s, however, the political mood in Athens was changing. New voices were demanding a greater role in Athenian government, especially the thetes, the lowest of the four classes established by Solon. • As rowers, these men were the backbone of the all-important Athenian fleet, as citizens, however, they played little role in the government of their polis. • An unlikely champion emerged for their cause, an aristocrat from one of Athens’ most prestigious noble families named Pericles. • A political rival of Cimon, Pericles used a platform of greater enfranchisement of the thetes, and an anti-Spartan foreign policy to defeat Cimon. • Pericles was elected Strategos for 462-461 and secured the ostracism of Cimon from Athens. * The Golden Age of Greece (479-336 B.C.) • The Peloponnesian Wars • He then pushed through reforms to make Athens more fully democratic. • He gave every Athenian citizen the right to propose and amend legislation, not just to vote yes or no in the citizen assembly. He also made it easier for poorer citizens to participate in the assembly and the great appeals court of Athens by paying an average day’s wage for attendance. • Through these and other measures, the thetes became a dominant force in politics, loyal to the man who had made that dominance possible. • Pericles glorified Athens’ democracy with an ambitious scheme of public building and lavish festivals to the gods, especially Athena. He was also a generous patron of the arts, sciences, literature, and of the stage, attracting the greatest minds of the day to Athens. * The Golden Age of Greece (479-336 B.C.) • The Peloponnesian Wars • His populist political stance, combined with his ability to inspire a sense of Athenian superiority, ensured his reelection as Strategos for the next three decades. • During his reign in Athens, the Greek cultural innovations of drama, comedy, tragedy, on the stage were born. • Statuary came to be less frozen, and the human form in various poses was glorified, such as in the Dying Gaul. * The Golden Age of Greece (479-336 B.C.) • The Peloponnesian Wars • Everything we know about the Peloponnesian Wars we have learned from Thucydides • Thucydides was a wealthy fellow from the suburbs of Athens. • He served as a general in the Peloponnesian War and actually managed to survive the whole bloody affair. • Thucydides' History of the Peloponnesian War is no memoir, though. In its day, it was the most thorough historical account ever written. And, we haven't made many improvements since then. • Thucydides has all the qualities that have come to define a great historian. • He's unbiased (or at least trying to be). • He's incredibly thorough. • He's not interested in the supernatural, only the rational. * The Golden Age of Greece (479-336 B.C.) • The Peloponnesian Wars • And, best of all, he was there. • The Peloponnesian War was a chaotic, messy conflict between Athens and Sparta that dragged on for nearly 30 years. • At the beginning of the war, Athens controlled a vast maritime empire. By the end of the war, Athens had been stripped of its empire and did not even control itself. So what happened to bring the mighty Athenian empire low? • Causes of the War • The causes of the Peloponnesian War stretch back for decades. • After the Persian navy was destroyed at the battle of Mycale, the Athenians founded the Delian League to punish the Persians by taking their colonies in the Aegean and adding them to the Athenian Empire. • With no navy to defend them, the Persians were soundly defeated, and within 30 years, the Athenians controlled a vast maritime empire containing most of the islands in the Aegean and much of the coast of Asia Minor. * The Golden Age of Greece (479-336 B.C.) • The Peloponnesian Wars • Meanwhile, back at home, as Athens grew ever richer and more powerful, the Spartans were feeling increasingly nervous about Athens' imperial ambitions. • Thucydides wrote 'The growth of the power of Athens, and the alarm which this inspired in Lacedaemon (Sparta), made war inevitable.' • Sparta had its own league, the Peloponnesian League, which included most of the city-states of mainland Greece, and they did not appreciate the Athenians trying to poach their member states for their Delian League. • In 465 BCE, Sparta's slave class, the Helots, attempted to throw off their Spartan oppressors. • Every Greek city-state sent soldiers to help put down the revolt. • The Athenians sent a large contingent of over 5,000 soldiers, but the Spartans would not allow them into the country, fearing that so large a force intended to take advantage of the chaos, not to help with it. * The Golden Age of Greece (479-336 B.C.) • The Peloponnesian Wars • This was but the first of many insults each side offered each other. • The next major insult came in 449, when two members of the Peloponnesian League, Megara and Corinth, started fighting. • Eager to gain a stronghold on the mainland, Athens formed an alliance with Megara and entered the fighting. • The result was a 15-year-long struggle between Athenians and Spartans, which some have called the First Peloponnesian War. • This battle only concluded in 445 BCE with the signing of the 30 Years' Peace. • The 30 Years' Peace was basically an agreement between the Spartans and the Athenians not to mess with one another's respective empires. • Yet the terms of this peace proved too much for the Athenians to live by. • For the next 15 years, Athens starting acting more and more like a bully. * The Golden Age of Greece (479-336 B.C.) • The Peloponnesian Wars • They crushed revolting colonies, they sowed dissent among Sparta's allies, they vied with their neighbor, Corinth, for control of the islands of the Aegean and they even imposed economic sanctions on their former allies the Megarians • Until, in 431, the rest of the world could take it no longer. Athens had made enemies of the Spartans, the Peloponnesian League, the King of Macedon, the emperor of Persia and even their own allies. • Everyone was so mad at Athens that a conflict was inevitable. But the Athenians were prepared for this fight. • Pericles' Grand Strategy • Their leader, Pericles, had been certain that the 30 Years' Peace would not live up to its name. • So as soon as the Spartans had left the land surrounding Athens, they had started building a long wall connecting the city of Athens to its port, Piraeus. * The Golden Age of Greece (479-336 B.C.) • The Peloponnesian Wars • In this way, Pericles said, Athens could behave like an island. • It did not matter that the Spartan army was invincible. • Athens never had to meet Sparta on land. • It did not matter if Sparta burned their fields and stole their flocks. Athens had an entire empire to import food from. • As long as the Athenian navy reigned supreme, it could keep the city supplied against even the longest siege. • Moreover, that navy allowed the Athenians another advantage over their land-based foes the Spartans. • An army is only useful in a battle. It spends most of its time moving from point A to point B. This might take months. As a result, that amazing Spartan army was really only useful for a few days out of the month. * The Golden Age of Greece (479-336 B.C.) • The Peloponnesian Wars • By contrast, with their ships, the relatively small Athenian army could show up anywhere at any time. They could disembark, do their damage and beat back to sea before their enemies could muster any resistance. • The speed and mobility of the Athenian navy was especially dangerous to Sparta since their slaves, the Helots, were always on the brink of revolt.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/79382 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-09-30 and may be subject to change. The Use of exempla in Roman Declamation Author(s): Marc van der Poel Reviewed work(s): Source: Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, Vol. 27, No. 3, Special issue: An International Project on the Pseudo-Quintilianic Declamationes maioresSpecial issue: An International Project on the Pseudo-Quintilianic Declamationes maiores (Summer 2009), pp. 332-353 Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the International Society for the History of Rhetoric Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/RH.2009.27.3.332 . Accessed: 26/09/2012 10:21 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of California Press and International Society for the History of Rhetoric are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric. http://www.jstor.org Marc van der Poel The Use of exempla in Roman Declamation Abstract: In this paper I present a list of the exempla used in the four surviving ancient collections of declamations (see Appendix: checklist of exempla), with a brief survey of the theory of the exem- plum in rhetorical handbooks and discussion of a few samples from the Controversiae and the Declamationes maiores.Myobservations suggest that Seneca’s criticism of the use of exempla in declamations (Contr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese
    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA AN ancient city in Greece, the capital of Laconia and the most powerful state of the Peloponnese. The city lay at the northern end of the central Laconian plain, on the right bank of the river Eurotas, a little south of the point where it is joined by its largest tributary, the Oenus (mount Kelefina). The site is admirably fitted by nature to guard the only routes by which an army can penetrate Laconia from the land side, the Oenus and Eurotas valleys leading from Arcadia, its northern neighbour, and the Langada Pass over Mt Taygetus connecting Laconia and Messenia. At the same time its distance from the sea-Sparta is 27 m. from its seaport, Gythium, made it invulnerable to a maritime attack. I.-HISTORY Prehistoric Period.-Tradition relates that Sparta was founded by Lacedaemon, son of Zeus and Taygete, who called the city after the name of his wife, the daughter of Eurotas. But Amyclae and Therapne (Therapnae) seem to have been in early times of greater importance than Sparta, the former a Minyan foundation a few miles to the south of Sparta, the latter probably the Achaean capital of Laconia and the seat of Menelaus, Agamemnon's younger brother. Eighty years after the Trojan War, according to the traditional chronology, the Dorian migration took place. A band of Dorians united with a body of Aetolians to cross the Corinthian Gulf and invade the Peloponnese from the northwest. The Aetolians settled in Elis, the Dorians pushed up to the headwaters of the Alpheus, where they divided into two forces, one of which under Cresphontes invaded and later subdued Messenia, while the other, led by Aristodemus or, according to another version, by his twin sons Eurysthenes and Procles, made its way down the Eurotas were new settlements were formed and gained Sparta, which became the Dorian capital of Laconia.
    [Show full text]
  • Herodotus' Athenian Artemisia
    Tyrannos, Rhētōr, and Strategos: Herodotus’ Athenian Artemisia Nick Ackert Harvard University Classical Languages and Literature Class of 2017 Abstract: Portrayed as the charismatic Queen of Halicarnassus, shrewd adviser to the Xerxes, and fearless admiral at the Battle of Salamis, Herodotus' Artemisia boldly transgresses into the traditionally male-dominated spaces of tyrant, orator, and general. While some have interpreted Artemisia’s lack of punctilio as emblematic of a Persia so politically and culturally backwards that even women (viewed by Greeks as the inferior sex) were entrusted with authority, the significance of her narrative may be more complex. In light of recent scholarship about Herodotus’ generally favorable presentation of women, it appears that each of Artemisia’s three appearances - Histories 7.99, 8.68-69, and 8.87-88 – actually serve to liken the Queen to her Athenian foes. An interpretation of Artemisia as fundamentally Athenian reminds us that the rigid, binary association of a “feminine East” and a “masculine West” in Greek historiography should be called into question. Overview† Few case studies have complicated current discussions about the representation of women in Classical Greek literature like the Histories’ portrayal of Artemisia, tyrant-queen of Herodotus’ own Halicarnassus and loyal ally to Xerxes. As roughly contemporary texts like Xenophon’s Oeconomicus suggest, the ideal Greek woman was passive and subservient to the instruction of her older husband; her sphere of influence was relegated to the management of the oikos rather than the political and military affairs of the polis (6.12-7.43, 9.11-10.1). Through Perikles’ misogynistic funeral oration, Thucydides’ Peloponnesian War similarly suggests that during conflict, Athenian wives could be models for all Greek women by serving their embattled husbands as attendants who were never spoken of (2.45.2).Throughout the five chapters of her narrative in the Histories(7.99, 8.68-69, and 8.87-88), however, Artemisia’s characterization and behavior subscribe to no such expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • Plutarch on Cimon, Athenian Expeditions, and Ephialtes' Reform
    Plutarch on Cimon, Athenian Expeditions, and Ephialtes’ Reform (Plut. Cim.14–17) Valerij Goušchin N THE 460S B.C. Cimon played a key role in Athenian politics. But his predominance came to an end in 462/1, I when he was ostracized. Not long before his exile he had clashed with Ephialtes over support for the Lacedaemonians, They had called on the Athenians for help against the Helots and perioikoi, who had revolted. Cimon argued strongly for helping the Lacedaemonians while Ephialtes opposed aiding Sparta. But Cimon’s dominance was still great and he was sent, Thucydides reports, to Messenia (1.102.1, cf. Ar. Lys.1137– 1146). While he was away Ephialtes accomplished his reform (462 B.C.), which deprived the Areopagus of its role as guardian of the laws and diminished the influence of the aristocracy. The Lacedaemonians, frightened by Ephialtes’ reform (or by neo- teropoiia in Thucydides’ terminology), dismissed the Athenian contingent. Shortly after returning from Messenia Cimon was ostracized. This is the generally accepted view, which is based mainly on Thucydides’ account.1 We have in addition Plutarch’s narrative in the biography of Cimon, where he presents the course of the same events differ- ently (Cim. 14–17). In particular, he speaks of two Athenian expeditions to Messenia and of the reform of Ephialtes that was carried out at the time of a certain naval expedition. This version is well known, but is considered untrustworthy. I propose that 1 E.g. P. J. Rhodes, “The Athenian Revolution,” in CAH2 V (1992) 69; S. Hornblower, The Greek World 479–323 BC (London/New York 2002) 23.
    [Show full text]
  • Lives, Volume Ii : Themistocles and Camillus
    LIVES, VOLUME II : THEMISTOCLES AND CAMILLUS. ARISTIDES AND CATO MAJOR. CIMON AND LUCULLUS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Plutarch | 640 pages | 01 Jul 1989 | HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS | 9780674990531 | English | Cambridge, Mass, United States Lives, Volume II : Themistocles and Camillus. Aristides and Cato Major. Cimon and Lucullus PDF Book Plutarch's many other varied extant works, about 60 in number, are known as Moralia or Moral Essays. Vol 2 by Plutarch , Bernadotte Perrin translator 4. Annotation Plutarch Plutarchus , ca. Contact us. Heath , Hardcover 4. Andreas Hofer. Subscribe to E-News. Most popular have always been the 46 "Parallel Lives," biographies planned to be ethical examples in pairs in each pair, one Greek figure and one similar Roman , though the last four lives are single. Explore Departments. Aristides and Cato Major. Enabling JavaScript in your browser will allow you to experience all the features of our site. Online book clubs can be a rewarding way to connect with readers, Lindsay Chervinsky discovered, when she was invited to join one to discuss her book, The Cabinet: George Washington and the Creation of an American Institution. He appears as a man of kindly character and independent thought, studious and learned. Plutarch's Lives by Plutarch , Bernadotte Perrin 4. AD , was born at Chaeronea in Boeotia in central Greece, studied philosophy at Athens, and, after coming to Rome as a teacher in philosophy, was given consular rank by the emperor Trajan and a procuratorship in Greece by Hadrian. They are of high literary value, besides being of great use to people interested in philosophy, ethics and religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Contesting the Greatness of Alexander the Great: the Representation of Alexander in the Histories of Polybius and Livy
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: CONTESTING THE GREATNESS OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT: THE REPRESENTATION OF ALEXANDER IN THE HISTORIES OF POLYBIUS AND LIVY Nikolaus Leo Overtoom, Master of Arts, 2011 Directed By: Professor Arthur M. Eckstein, Department of History By investigating the works of Polybius and Livy, we can discuss an important aspect of the impact of Alexander upon the reputation and image of Rome. Because of the subject of their histories and the political atmosphere in which they were writing - these authors, despite their generally positive opinions of Alexander, ultimately created scenarios where they portrayed the Romans as superior to the Macedonian king. This study has five primary goals: to produce a commentary on the various Alexander passages found in Polybius’ and Livy’s histories; to establish the generally positive opinion of Alexander held by these two writers; to illustrate that a noticeable theme of their works is the ongoing comparison between Alexander and Rome; to demonstrate Polybius’ and Livy’s belief in Roman superiority, even over Alexander; and finally to create an understanding of how this motif influences their greater narratives and alters our appreciation of their works. CONTESTING THE GREATNESS OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT: THE REPRESENTATION OF ALEXANDER IN THE HISTORIES OF POLYBIUS AND LIVY By Nikolaus Leo Overtoom Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 2011 Advisory Committee: Professor Arthur M. Eckstein, Chair Professor Judith P. Hallett Professor Kenneth G. Holum © Copyright by Nikolaus Leo Overtoom 2011 Dedication in amorem matris Janet L.
    [Show full text]
  • Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period Ryan
    Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period by Ryan Anthony Boehm A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Emily Mackil, Chair Professor Erich Gruen Professor Mark Griffith Spring 2011 Copyright © Ryan Anthony Boehm, 2011 ABSTRACT SYNOIKISM, URBANIZATION, AND EMPIRE IN THE EARLY HELLENISTIC PERIOD by Ryan Anthony Boehm Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology University of California, Berkeley Professor Emily Mackil, Chair This dissertation, entitled “Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period,” seeks to present a new approach to understanding the dynamic interaction between imperial powers and cities following the Macedonian conquest of Greece and Asia Minor. Rather than constructing a political narrative of the period, I focus on the role of reshaping urban centers and regional landscapes in the creation of empire in Greece and western Asia Minor. This period was marked by the rapid creation of new cities, major settlement and demographic shifts, and the reorganization, consolidation, or destruction of existing settlements and the urbanization of previously under- exploited regions. I analyze the complexities of this phenomenon across four frameworks: shifting settlement patterns, the regional and royal economy, civic religion, and the articulation of a new order in architectural and urban space. The introduction poses the central problem of the interrelationship between urbanization and imperial control and sets out the methodology of my dissertation. After briefly reviewing and critiquing previous approaches to this topic, which have focused mainly on creating catalogues, I point to the gains that can be made by shifting the focus to social and economic structures and asking more specific interpretive questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Athenian Empire 478To 404B.C. Formation Of
    ATHENIAN EMPIRE 478 TO 404 B.C. FORMATION OF DELIAN LEAGUE TO FALL OF ATHENS ERA SUMMARY – ATHENIAN EMPIRE In the years following the Persian War, Athens was rebuilt and the Greek navy expanded its domination of the Aegean Sea. Further naval victories over Persia resulted in the freeing of several Ionian Greek colonies from the Persian yoke and the increased prestige of Greece as a sea power. Athenian control of the Greek navy was made possible the by creation of the Delian league, a group of Greek colonies located in the Aegean Sea united for defense. Although this league was nominally a confederation, it was dominated by Athens, and eventually became the foundation of the Athenian Empire. Athens became very wealthy due both to its domination of trade in the region and also to the inflow of tribute that had to be paid to Athens in return for protection from Persia. The most important statesmen in Athens in the years immediately after the Persian War, were Cimon, son of Miltiades, and Aristides. Both were involved in the organization of the Delian league and the rebuilding of Athens, including the construction of a fortified wall around the city to protect it from future invasions. Sparta opposed the building of walled cities, lest they fall into enemy hands, but the Athenians insisted and eventually a great wall was built from Athens to the sea, wide enough to drive two Chariots abreast. During the same period, great temples and state houses were built, funded mostly from the Delian league tributes, on a scale never before seen on the continent of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Cimon's Dismissal, Ephialtes' Revolution and the Peloponnesian Wars Cole, John R Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1974; 15, 4; Proquest Pg
    Cimon's Dismissal, Ephialtes' Revolution and the Peloponnesian Wars Cole, John R Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1974; 15, 4; ProQuest pg. 369 Cimon's Dismissal, Ephialtes' Revolution and the Peloponnesian Wars John R. Cole HE YEAR 462 B.C. may have marked the most acute crisis in what Bengtson calls "the decisive turning point in the internal and T 1 external histories" of Sparta and Athens. We lack the authori­ tative historical source to state from antiquity the case for 462 that Herodotus states for 480 or Thucydides for 431. But ancient histori­ cal tradition does suggest the unique concatenation of three calamities in 462. First in the tradition, at Sparta the earthquake of 464 and the subsequent helot rebellion shook the state to its very foundations, so that proud Sparta had to come as suppliant to Athens. Second, at Athens the <revolution' of Ephialtes overthrew Areopagite oligarchy and established Periclean democracy, hardly less calamitous an event in surviving accounts. Third, between Sparta and Athens opened the decisive rift, the <dismissal' of Cimon from Ithome by <fearful' Spartans, followed by his ostracism, the reversal of alliances, and the first of the Peloponnesian wars. The severity of these calamities was not doubted in antiquity. But our sources on the first two are uncritical enough and removed enough in time to encourage a measure of skepticism among moderns. Dio­ dorns, Plutarch and Pausanias are open to question, as is Aristotle. But on the third calamity, Thucydides has always seemed critical enough and close enough to command assent. It is my purpose to encourage a measure of skepticism concerning Thucydides' account of the <dismissal' of Cimon, the one event of this most crucial year that our best and earliest source emphasized.
    [Show full text]
  • The Athenian Empire
    Week 8: The Athenian Empire Lecture 13, The Delian League, Key Words Aeschylus’ Persians Plataea Mycale Second Ionian Revolt Samos Chios Lesbos Leotychidas Xanthippus Sestos Panhellenism Medizers Corinth Common Oaths Common Freedom Asia Minor Themistocles Pausanias Dorcis Hegemony by Invitation Aristides Uliades of Samos Byzantium Hybris Delos Ionia Hellespont Caria Thrace NATO UN Phoros Hellenotamias Synod Local Autonomy 1 Lecture 14, From League to Empire, Key Words Eion Strymon Scyros Dolopians Cleruchy Carystus Naxos Eurymedon Caria Lycia Thasos Ennea Hodoi Indemnity Diodorus Thucydides Athenian Imperial Democracy Tribute Lists Garrisons 2 Chronological Table for the Pentekontaetia 479-431 481/0 Hellenic League, a standard offensive and defensive alliance (symmachia), formed with 31 members under Spartan leadership. 480/79 Persian War; battles under Spartan leadership: Thermopylae (King Leonidas), Artemesium and Salamis (Eurybiades), Plataea (Pausanias), and Mycale (King Leotychides). 479 Thank-offerings dedicated at Delphi for victory over Persia including serpent column listing 31 cities faithful to “the Hellenes”. Samos, Chios, and Lesbos, and other islanders enrolled in the Hellenic League. Sparta, alarmed by the growth of Athenian power and daring, send envoys to urge the Athenians not to rebuild their walls, but Themistocles rejects the idea and tricks the envoys; Athenians rebuild walls using old statues as ‘fill’, while Themistocles is on diplomatic mission to Sparta. Following the departure of Leotychides and the Peloponnesian contingents, Xanthippus and the Athenians cross over to Sestos on the European side of the Hellespont, lay siege to the town, and capture the Persian fortress. Themistocles persuades the Athenians to complete fortifications at Piraeus, begun in 492; while Cimon promotes cooperation with Sparta, Themistocles hostile to the hegemon of the Peloponnesian and Hellenic leagues; attempts to rouse anti-Spartan feelings.
    [Show full text]
  • VALOUR, DUTY, SACRIFICE: SPARTA ‘In Sparta Are to Be Found Those Who Are Most Enslaved and Those Who Are the Most Free.’
    CHAPTER 2 VALOUR, DUTY, SACRIFICE: SPARTA ‘In Sparta are to be found those who are most enslaved and those who are the most free.’ CRITIAS OF ATHENS sample pages Spartan infantry in a formation called a phalanx. 38 39 CHAPTER 2 VALOUR, DUTY, SACRIFICE: SPARTA KEY POINTS KEY CONCEPTS OVERVIEW • At the end of the Dark Age, the Spartan polis emerged DEMOCRACY OLIGARCHY TYRANNY MONARCHY from the union of a few small villages in the Eurotas valley. Power vested in the hands Power vested in the hands A system under the control A system under the control • Owing to a shortage of land for its citizens, Sparta waged of all citizens of the polis of a few individuals of a non-hereditary ruler of a king war on its neighbour Messenia to expand its territory. unrestricted by any laws • The suppression of the Messenians led to a volatile slave or constitution population that threatened Sparta’s way of life, making the DEFINITION need for reform urgent. KEY EVENTS • A new constitution was put in place to ensure Sparta could protect itself from this new threat, as well as from tyranny. Citizens of the polis all A small, powerful and One individual exercises Hereditary rule passing 800 BCE • Sweeping reforms were made that transformed Sparta share equal rights in the wealthy aristocratic class complete authority over from father to son political sphere all aspects of everyday life Sparta emerges from the into a powerful military state that soon came to dominate Most citizens barred from Family dynasties claim without constraint Greek Dark Age the Peloponnese.
    [Show full text]
  • S Cimon, Son of Miltiades (Father) And
    is is a version of an electronic document, part of the series, Dēmos: Clas- sical Athenian Democracy, a publicationpublication ofof e Stoa: a consortium for electronic publication in the humanities [www.stoa.org]. e electronic version of this article off ers contextual information intended to make the study of Athenian democracy more accessible to a wide audience. Please visit the site at http:// www.stoa.org/projects/demos/home. Cimon S Cimon, son of Miltiades (father) and Hegesipyle (mother), was a prominent Athenian in the fi rst half of the th cen- tury . He was instrumental in leading Athens to a dominant position in the Greek world a er the Persian Wars, and he opposed the more radical democratic re- forms of Ephialtes and Pericles, particularly their reform of the Court of the Areopagus. I: C’ F C In the early th century Athens became increasingly more democratic as the older institutions, which were dominated by the wealthy, lost power to newer institutions that were in the hands of the People. is change was not welcomed by everyone, and even a hundred years later, an aristocratic Athenian like Isocrates could complain of how, a er the Persian Wars, “the city grew powerful and seized the empire of the Greeks, and our fathers, growing more self–assured than was proper for them, began to look with Christopher W. Blackwell, “Cimon,” in C. Blackwell, ed., Dēmos: Classical Athenian Democracy (A.(A. MahoneyMahoney andand R.R. Scaife,Scaife, edd.,edd., e Stoa: a consortium for electronic publication in the humanities [www.stoa.org], .
    [Show full text]