DOCSLIB.ORG

Easy Access Rules for Sailplanes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Easy Access Rules for Sailplanes Easy Access Rules for Sailplanes EASA eRules: aviation rules for the 21st century Rules and regulations are the core of the European Union civil aviation system. The aim of the EASA eRules project is to make them accessible in an efficient and reliable way to stakeholders. EASA eRules will be a comprehensive, single system for the drafting, sharing and storing of rules. It will be the single source for all aviation safety rules applicable to European airspace users. It will offer easy (online) access to all rules and regulations as well as new and innovative applications such as rulemaking process automation, stakeholder consultation, cross-referencing, and comparison with ICAO and third countries’ standards. To achieve these ambitious objectives, the EASA eRules project is structured in ten modules to cover all aviation rules and innovative functionalities. The EASA eRules system is developed and implemented in close cooperation with Member States and aviation industry to ensure that all its capabilities are relevant and effective. Published October 20201 Copyright notice © European Union, 1998-2020 Except where otherwise stated, reuse of the EUR-Lex data for commercial or non-commercial purposes is authorised provided the source is acknowledged ('© European Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/, 1998-2020') 2. Cover page picture: © kadawittfeldarchitektur 1 The published date represents the date when the consolidated version of the document was generated. 2 Euro-Lex, Important Legal Notice: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/legal-notice/legal-notice.html. Powered by EASA eRules Page 2 of 314| Oct 2020 Easy Access Rules for Sailplanes Disclaimer DISCLAIMER This version is issued by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) in order to provide its stakeholders with an updated and easy-to-read publication related to sailplanes. It has been prepared by putting together the officially published regulations with the related acceptable means of compliance and guidance material (including the amendments) adopted so far and certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance and guidance material. However, this is not an official publication and EASA accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the use of this document. Powered by EASA eRules Page 3 of 314| Oct 2020 Easy Access Rules for Sailplanes Note from the editor NOTE FROM THE EDITOR The content of this document is arranged as follows: the cover regulation (recitals and articles) of the implementing rule (IR) appear first, then the IR annex points, followed by the related acceptable means of compliance (AMC) and guidance material (GM) paragraph(s). In case of certification specifications (CS), a CS paragraph is followed by the related AMC paragraph. All elements (i.e. cover regulation, IRs, CS, AMC and GM) are colour-coded and can be identified according to the illustration below. The Commission regulation or EASA Executive Director (ED) decision through which the point or paragraph was introduced or last amended is indicated below the point or paragraph title(s) in italics. Cover regulation article Commission regulation Implementing rule annex Commission regulation Certification specification ED decision Acceptable means of compliance ED decision Guidance material ED decision This document will be updated regularly to incorporate further amendments. The format of this document has been adjusted to make it user-friendly and for reference purposes. Any comments should be sent to [email protected]. Powered by EASA eRules Page 4 of 314| Oct 2020 Easy Access Rules for Sailplanes Incorporated amendments INCORPORATED AMENDMENTS IMPLEMENTING RULES (IRS) (COMMISSION REGULATIONS) Incorporated Commission Affected Part Domain Applicability date1 Regulation Cover regulation Air Regulation (EU) 2018/1976 Annex I — Definitions (Part-DEF) 9/7/2019 operations Annex II — Sailplane air operations (Part-SAO) Cover regulation Annex I — Definitions (Part-DEF) Air Regulation (EU) 2020/358 Annex II — Sailplane air operations (Part-SAO) operations 8/4/2020 Annex III — Requirements for Sailplanes Flight and Aircrew Crew Licensing (Part-SFCL) AMC/GM TO IR (ED DECISIONS) Issue/ Incorporated ED Decision Affected AMC/GM Applicability date Amendment No Annex I — GM to Cover regulation ED Decision 2019/001/R Annex II — AMC and GM to Annex II Initial issue 9/7/2019 Sailplane Air Operations (Part-SAO) ED Decision 2020/004/R AMC and GM to Annex III (Part-SFCL) Issue 1 8/4/2020 CS/AMC (ED DECISIONS) Incorporated ED Decision CS/AMC Issue No, Amendment No Applicability date ED Decision 2003/13/RM CS-22/ Initial issue 14/11/2003 ED Decision 2008/008/R CS-22/ Amendment 1 1/10/2008 ED Decision 2009/009/R CS-22/ Amendment 2 5/3/2009 Note: To access the official source documents, please use the links provided above. 1 This date is the earliest applicability date for this regulation. Some provisions of the regulation may be applicable at a later date. Besides, there may be some opt-out filed by the Member States. Powered by EASA eRules Page 5 of 314| Oct 2020 Easy Access Rules for Sailplanes Table of contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Disclaimer ...................................................................................... 3 Note from the editor ...................................................................... 4 Incorporated amendments ............................................................. 5 Table of contents ........................................................................... 6 Chapter 1 — Air operations and Licensing .................................... 19 Cover regulation ................................................................................... 19 Article 1 - Subject matter and scope ...................................................................... 20 Article 2 - Definitions .............................................................................................. 20 Article 3 - Air operations ........................................................................................ 21 GM1 to Article 3(2)(a);(b) Air operations ................................................................ 22 GM2 to Article 3(2)(a);(b) Air operations ................................................................ 22 GM1 to Article 3(2)(c) Air operations ...................................................................... 22 GM2 to Article 3(2)(c) Air operations ...................................................................... 22 Article 3a - Pilot licences and medical certification ............................................... 23 Article 3b - Existing pilot licences and national medical certificates ..................... 23 Article 3c - Credit for training that commenced prior to the date of application of this Regulation ....................................................................................................... 24 Article 3d - Training organisations ......................................................................... 24 Article 4 - Entry into force and application ............................................................ 25 ANNEX I ................................................................................................ 26 DEFINITIONS (Part-DEF) ......................................................................................... 26 FCL.010 Definitions related to Part-SFCL ............................................................... 28 ANNEX II — SAILPLANE AIR OPERATIONS (Part-SAO) ............................ 29 SUBPART GEN – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.................................................... 29 SAO.GEN.100 Scope ............................................................................................... 29 SAO.GEN.105 Competent authority ....................................................................... 29 SAO.GEN.110 Demonstration of compliance ......................................................... 29 AMC1 SAO.GEN.110(a) Demonstration of compliance ........................................... 29 GM1 SAO.GEN.110(b)(2) Demonstration of compliance ......................................... 30 SAO.GEN.115 Introductory flights .......................................................................... 30 SAO.GEN.120 Immediate reaction to a safety problem ........................................ 30 SAO.GEN.125 Designation of the pilot-in-command ............................................. 30 SAO.GEN.130 Responsibilities of the pilot-in-command ....................................... 30 AMC1 SAO.GEN.130(c) Responsibilities of the pilot-in-command .......................... 32 AMC1 SAO.GEN.130(d)(4) Responsibilities of the pilot-in-command ..................... 32 AMC1 SAO.GEN.130(f) Responsibilities of the pilot-in-command ........................... 32 AMC1 SAO.GEN.130(f) & SAO.GEN.135(b) Responsibilities of the pilot-in-command & responsibilities of crew members ........................................................................ 32 AMC1 SAO.GEN.130(p) Responsibilities of the pilot-in-command .......................... 32 GM1 SAO.GEN.130(a);(b) Responsibilities of the pilot-in-command ...................... 33 Powered by EASA eRules Page 6 of 314| Oct 2020 Easy Access Rules for Sailplanes Table of contents GM1 SAO.GEN.130(f) Responsibilities of the pilot-in-command ............................ 33 GM1 SAO.GEN.130(f) & SAO.GEN.135(b) Responsibilities of the pilot-in-command & responsibilities of crew members ...........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Weather and Aviation: How Does Weather Affect the Safety and Operations of Airports and Aviation, and How Does FAA Work to Manage Weather-Related Effects?
    Kulesa 1 Weather and Aviation: How Does Weather Affect the Safety and Operations of Airports and Aviation, and How Does FAA Work to Manage Weather-related Effects? By Gloria Kulesa Weather Impacts On Aviation In addition, weather continues to play a significant role in a number of aviation Introduction accidents and incidents. While National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) reports ccording to FAA statistics, weather is most commonly find human error to be the the cause of approximately 70 percent direct accident cause, weather is a primary of the delays in the National Airspace contributing factor in 23 percent of all System (NAS). Figure 1 illustrates aviation accidents. The total weather impact that while weather delays declined with overall is an estimated national cost of $3 billion for NAS delays after September 11th, 2001, delays accident damage and injuries, delays, and have since returned to near-record levels. unexpected operating costs. 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 1 01 01 0 01 02 02 ul an 01 J ep an 02 J Mar May S Nov 01 J Mar May Weather Delays Other Delays Figure 1. Delay hours in the National Airspace System for January 2001 to July 2002. Delay hours peaked at 50,000 hours per month in August 2001, declined to less than 15,000 per month for the months following September 11, but exceeded 30,000 per month in the summer of 2002. Weather delays comprise the majority of delays in all seasons. The Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Transportation 2 Weather and Aviation: How Does Weather Affect the Safety and Operations of Airports and Aviation, and How Does FAA Work to Manage Weather-related Effects? Thunderstorms and Other Convective In-Flight Icing.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation and Flight Assessment of a Scale Glider
    Dissertations and Theses 8-2014 Evaluation and Flight Assessment of a Scale Glider Alvydas Anthony Civinskas Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/edt Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Civinskas, Alvydas Anthony, "Evaluation and Flight Assessment of a Scale Glider" (2014). Dissertations and Theses. 41. https://commons.erau.edu/edt/41 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Evaluation and Flight Assessment of a Scale Glider by Alvydas Anthony Civinskas A Thesis Submitted to the College of Engineering Department of Aerospace Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Daytona Beach, Florida August 2014 Acknowledgements The first person I would like to thank is my committee chair Dr. William Engblom for all the help, guidance, energy, and time he put into helping me. I would also like to thank Dr. Hever Moncayo for giving up his time, patience, and knowledge about flight dynamics and testing. Without them, this project would not have materialized nor survived the many bumps in the road. Secondly, I would like to thank the RC pilot Daniel Harrison for his time and effort in taking up the risky and stressful work of piloting. Individuals like Jordan Beckwith and Travis Billette cannot be forgotten for their numerous contributions in getting the motor test stand made and helping in creating the air data boom pod so that test data.
    [Show full text]
  • Ai2019-2 Aircraft Serious Incident Investigation Report
    AI2019-2 AIRCRAFT SERIOUS INCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT ACADEMIC CORPORATE BODY JAPAN AVIATION ACADEMY J A 2 4 5 1 March 28, 2019 The objective of the investigation conducted by the Japan Transport Safety Board in accordance with the Act for Establishment of the Japan Transport Safety Board and with Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation is to prevent future accidents and incidents. It is not the purpose of the investigation to apportion blame or liability. Kazuhiro Nakahashi Chairman Japan Transport Safety Board Note: This report is a translation of the Japanese original investigation report. The text in Japanese shall prevail in the interpretation of the report. AIRCRAFT SERIOUS INCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT INABILITY TO OPERATE DUE TO DAMAGE TO LANDING GEAR DURING FORCED LANDING ON A GRASSY FIELD ABOUT 3 KM SOUTHWEST OF NOTO AIRPORT, JAPAN AT ABOUT 15:00 JST, SEPTEMBER 26, 2018 ACADEMIC CORPORATE BODY JAPAN AVIATION ACADEMY VALENTIN TAIFUN 17EII (MOTOR GLIDER: TWO SEATER), JA2451 February 22, 2019 Adopted by the Japan Transport Safety Board Chairman Kazuhiro Nakahashi Member Toru Miyashita Member Toshiyuki Ishikawa Member Yuichi Marui Member Keiji Tanaka Member Miwa Nakanishi 1. PROCESS AND PROGRESS OF THE INVESTIGATION 1.1 Summary of On Wednesday, September 26, 2018, a Valentin Taifun 17EII (motor the Serious glider), registered JA2451, owned by Japan Aviation Academy, took off from Incident Noto Airport in order to make a test flight before the airworthiness inspection. During the flight, as causing trouble in its electric system, the aircraft tried to return to Noto Airport by gliding, but made a forced landing on a grassy field about 3 km short of Noto Airport, and sustained damage to the landing gear, therefore, the operation of the aircraft could not be continued.
    [Show full text]
  • AMA FPG-9 Glider OBJECTIVES – Students Will Learn About the Basics of How Flight Works by Creating a Simple Foam Glider
    AEX MARC_Layout 1 1/10/13 3:03 PM Page 18 activity two AMA FPG-9 Glider OBJECTIVES – Students will learn about the basics of how flight works by creating a simple foam glider. – Students will be introduced to concepts about air pressure, drag and how aircraft use control surfaces to climb, turn, and maintain stable flight. Activity Credit: Credit and permission to reprint – The Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA) and Mr. Jack Reynolds, a volunteer at the National Model Aviation Museum, has graciously given the Civil Air Patrol permission to reprint the FPG-9 model plan and instructions here. More activities and suggestions for classroom use of model aircraft can be found by contacting the Academy of Model Aeronautics Education Committee at their website, buildandfly.com. MATERIALS • FPG-9 pattern • 9” foam plate • Scissors • Clear tape • Ink pen • Penny 18 AEX MARC_Layout 1 1/10/13 3:03 PM Page 19 BACKGROUND Control surfaces on an airplane help determine the movement of the airplane. The FPG-9 glider demonstrates how the elevons and the rudder work. Elevons are aircraft control surfaces that combine the functions of the elevator (used for pitch control) and the aileron (used for roll control). Thus, elevons at the wing trailing edge are used for pitch and roll control. They are frequently used on tailless aircraft such as flying wings. The rudder is the small moving section at the rear of the vertical stabilizer that is attached to the fixed sections by hinges. Because the rudder moves, it varies the amount of force generated by the tail surface and is used to generate and control the yawing (left and right) motion of the aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Aviation Administration, DOT § 61.45
    Federal Aviation Administration, DOT Pt. 61 Vmcl Minimum Control Speed—Landing. 61.35 Knowledge test: Prerequisites and Vmu The speed at which the last main passing grades. landing gear leaves the ground. 61.37 Knowledge tests: Cheating or other VR Rotate Speed. unauthorized conduct. VS Stall Speed or minimum speed in the 61.39 Prerequisites for practical tests. stall. 61.41 Flight training received from flight WAT Weight, Altitude, Temperature. instructors not certificated by the FAA. 61.43 Practical tests: General procedures. END QPS REQUIREMENTS 61.45 Practical tests: Required aircraft and equipment. [Doc. No. FAA–2002–12461, 73 FR 26490, May 9, 61.47 Status of an examiner who is author- 2008] ized by the Administrator to conduct practical tests. PART 61—CERTIFICATION: PILOTS, 61.49 Retesting after failure. FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS, AND 61.51 Pilot logbooks. 61.52 Use of aeronautical experience ob- GROUND INSTRUCTORS tained in ultralight vehicles. 61.53 Prohibition on operations during med- SPECIAL FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATION NO. ical deficiency. 73 61.55 Second-in-command qualifications. SPECIAL FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATION NO. 61.56 Flight review. 100–2 61.57 Recent flight experience: Pilot in com- SPECIAL FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATION NO. mand. 118–2 61.58 Pilot-in-command proficiency check: Operation of an aircraft that requires Subpart A—General more than one pilot flight crewmember or is turbojet-powered. Sec. 61.59 Falsification, reproduction, or alter- 61.1 Applicability and definitions. ation of applications, certificates, 61.2 Exercise of Privilege. logbooks, reports, or records. 61.3 Requirement for certificates, ratings, 61.60 Change of address.
    [Show full text]
  • Glider Handbook, Chapter 2: Components and Systems
    Chapter 2 Components and Systems Introduction Although gliders come in an array of shapes and sizes, the basic design features of most gliders are fundamentally the same. All gliders conform to the aerodynamic principles that make flight possible. When air flows over the wings of a glider, the wings produce a force called lift that allows the aircraft to stay aloft. Glider wings are designed to produce maximum lift with minimum drag. 2-1 Glider Design With each generation of new materials and development and improvements in aerodynamics, the performance of gliders The earlier gliders were made mainly of wood with metal has increased. One measure of performance is glide ratio. A fastenings, stays, and control cables. Subsequent designs glide ratio of 30:1 means that in smooth air a glider can travel led to a fuselage made of fabric-covered steel tubing forward 30 feet while only losing 1 foot of altitude. Glide glued to wood and fabric wings for lightness and strength. ratio is discussed further in Chapter 5, Glider Performance. New materials, such as carbon fiber, fiberglass, glass reinforced plastic (GRP), and Kevlar® are now being used Due to the critical role that aerodynamic efficiency plays in to developed stronger and lighter gliders. Modern gliders the performance of a glider, gliders often have aerodynamic are usually designed by computer-aided software to increase features seldom found in other aircraft. The wings of a modern performance. The first glider to use fiberglass extensively racing glider have a specially designed low-drag laminar flow was the Akaflieg Stuttgart FS-24 Phönix, which first flew airfoil.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Annual Report
    2018 Aviation Annual Report Aviation Aircraft Use Summary U.S. Forest Service 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Table 1 – 2018 Forest Service Total Aircraft Available ..................................................................... 2 Introduction: The Forest Service Aviation Program...................................................................................... 3 Aviation Utilization and Cost Information .................................................................................................... 4 2018 At-A-Glance ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Aviation Use .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Table 2 and Figure 1 – Aircraft Total Use CY 2014-2018................................................................... 4 Figure 2 – CY 2018 Flight Hours by Month........................................................................................ 5 Table 3 and Figure 3 – Percent of CY 2018 Flight Time by Aircraft Type .......................................... 5 Table 4 – CY 2018 Aircraft Use by Region/Agency ............................................................................ 6 Aviation Cost ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 30 • Liulvibeil 249
    FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 30 • liulviBEil 249 Tuesday, December 28, 1965 • Washington, D.C. Pages 16099-16180 Agencies in this issue— Agricultural Research Service Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service Atomic Energy Commission Civil Aeronautics Board Commodity Credit Corporation Consumer and Marketing Service Federal Aviation Agency Federal Home Loan Bank Board Federal Housing Administration Federal Maritime Commission Federal Power Commission Federal Trade Commission Food and Drug Administration General Services Administration Interstate Commerce Commission Land Management Bureau Maritime Administration Public Health Service Reclamation Bureau Detailed list of Contents appears inside. Volume 7 8 UNITED STATES STATUTES AT LARGE [88th Cong., 2d Sess.l Contains laws and concurrent resolu­ merical listing of bills enacted into tions enacted by the Congress during public and private law, and a guide 1964, the twenty-fourth amendment to the legislative history of bills en­ to the Constitution, and Presidential acted into public law. proclamations. Included is a nu- Price: $8.75 Published by Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402 ¿f' Published, daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, or on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, National FERERAL*REGISTER Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration (mail address National Area Code 202 V , »3 4 Phone 963-3261 Archives Building, Washington, D.C. 20408), pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal Register Act, approved July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficient Light Aircraft Design – Options from Gliding
    Efficient Light Aircraft Design – Options from Gliding Howard Torode Member of General Aviation Group and Chairman BGA Technical Committee Presentation Aims • Recognise the convergence of interest between ultra-lights and sailplanes • Draw on experiences of sailplane designers in pursuit of higher aerodynamic performance. • Review several feature of current sailplanes that might be of wider use. • Review the future for the recreational aeroplane. Lift occurs in localised areas A glider needs efficiency and manoeuvrability Drag contributions for a glider Drag at low speed dominated by Induced drag (due to lift) Drag at high ASW-27 speeds Glider (total) drag polar dominated by profile drag & skin friction So what are the configuration parameters? - Low profile drag: Wing section design is key - Low skin friction: maximise laminar areas - Low induced drag – higher efficiencies demand greater spans, span efficiency and Aspect Ratio - Low parasitic drag – reduce excrescences such as: undercarriage, discontinuities of line and no leaks/gaps. - Low trim drag – small tails with efficient surface coupled with low stability for frequent speed changing. - Wide load carrying capacity in terms of pilot weight and water ballast Progress in aerodynamic efficiency 1933 - 2010 1957: Phoenix (16m) 1971: Nimbus 2 (20.3m) 2003: Eta (30.8m) 2010: Concordia (28m) 1937: Wiehe (18m) Wooden gliders Metal gliders Composite gliders In praise of Aspect Ratio • Basic drag equation in in non-dimensional, coefficient terms: • For an aircraft of a given scale, aspect ratio is the single overall configuration parameter that has direct leverage on performance. Induced drag - the primary contribution to drag at low speed, is inversely proportional to aspect ratio • An efficient wing is a key driver in optimising favourable design trades in other aspects of performance such as wing loading and cruise performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Fitzpatrick Biography
    The James L. G. Fitz Patrick Papers Archives & Special Collections College of Staten Island Library, CUNY 2800 Victory Blvd., 1L-216 Staten Island, NY 10314 © 2005, 2018 The College of Staten Island, CUNY Finding Aid by James A. Kaser Overview of the Collection Collection No. : CM-4 Title: The James L. G. Fitz Patrick Papers Creator: James L. G. Fitz Patrick (1906-1998) Dates: c. 1926-1998 Extent: Approximately 1.5 Linear Feet Abstract: Prof. James L. G. Fitzpatrick was a faculty member and administrator at the Staten Island Community College from 1959 to 1976. He taught and served as Head of the Department of Mechanical Technology. He was appointed the first Academic Dean of the college in 1959, serving as Dean of the Faculty and acting under the college president to administer the academic program. He also coordinated a large part of the planning for the college’s campus in Sunnyside, completed in 1967. Fitz Patrick became Dean for Operations and Development in 1971 and held that position until his retirement in 1976. Fitz Patrick was widely recognized as an expert on natural flight and aeronautics. This fragmentary collection mostly documents some of Fitz Patrick’s research activities. Administrative Information Preferred Citation The James L. G. Fitz Patrick Papers, Archives & Special Collections, Department of the Library, College of Staten Island, CUNY, Staten Island, New York Acquisition The papers were donated by Fitz Patrick’s stepson, Harold J. Smith. Processing Information Collection processed by the staff of Archives & Special Collections. 1 Restrictions Access Access to this record group is unrestricted.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventive Maintenance
    Maintenance Aspects of Owning Your Own Aircraft Introduction According to 14 CFR Part 43, Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, Rebuilding, and Alteration, the holder of a pilot certificate issued under 14 CFR Part 61 may perform specified preventive maintenance on any aircraft owned or operated by that pilot, as long as the aircraft is not used under 14 CFR Part 121, 127, 129, or 135. This pamphlet provides information on authorized preventive maintenance. How To Begin Here are several important points to understand before you attempt to perform your own preventive maintenance: First, you need to understand that authorized preventive maintenance cannot involve complex assembly operations. Second, you should carefully review 14 CFR Part 43, Appendix A, Subpart C (Preventive Maintenance), which provides a list of the authorized preventive maintenance work that an owner pilot may perform. Third, you should conduct a self-analysis as to whether you have the ability to perform the work satisfactorily and safely. Fourth, if you do any of the preventive maintenance authorized in 14 CFR Part 43, you will need to make an entry in the appropriate logbook or record system in order to document the work done. The entry must include the following information: • A description of the work performed, or references to data that are acceptable to the Administrator. • The date of completion. • The signature, certificate number, and kind of certificate held by the person performing the work. Note that the signature constitutes approval for return to service only for work performed. Examples of Preventive Maintenance Items The following is a partial list of what a certificated pilot who meets the conditions in 14 CFR Part 43 can do: • Remove, install, and repair landing gear tires.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonlinear Control of an Aerobatic RC Airplane
    Nonlinear Control of an Aerobatic RC Airplane MASSA CHUSETTS INSTITUTE by 0F TECHNOLOGY Joshua John Bialkowski J UN 2 3 2010 B.S., Georgia Institute of Technology (2007) LIBRARIES Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics ARCHIVES at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY May 2010 @ Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2010. All rights reserved. Author .......... .~. .....-.--...--.-.- D ar o % autics and Astronautics May 21, 2010 Certified by..... Prof Emilio Frazzoli Associate Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Thesis Supervisor / / IA Accepted by............. / Eytan H. Modiano Associate Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair, Committee on Graduate Students Nonlinear Control of an Aerobatic RC Airplane by Joshua John Bialkowski Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics on May 21, 2010, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics Abstract An automatic flight controller based on the ideas of backstepping is applied to an aerobatic RC airplane. The controller asymptotically tracks a time-parameterized position reference, and depends on an orientation look-up rule to detemine the vehicle orientation from a desired acceleration. A coordinated-flight look-up rule compatible with the controller provides a nominal level of capability for traditional flight trajec- tories. A generalized coordinated look-up rule compatible with the controller provides more advanced capability, including stability for high angle of attack and hovering maneuvers, at the expense of an additional requirement from the reference trajectory. Basic simulation results are used to verify the controller, and a simulation software framework is described which will enable more extensive simulation and provide a platform for the final controller implementation.
    [Show full text]