DOCSLIB.ORG

Agm 2019 Minutes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agm 2019 Minutes BRITISH VOLLEYBALL FEDERATION (company number 06651480) Minutes of the Annual General Meeting and Board Meeting held at 123 Buckingham Palace Rd, Victoria, London SW1W 9SS on Monday 11 February 2019 In attendance Richard Callicott [NED, President and Chair] (RC) Margaret Ann Fleming [Scottish Volleyball Association and BVF Finance Director] (MAF) Adam Walker [Volleyball England] (AW) Sandra Stall [Volleyball Wales] (SS) Paddy Murphy [Northern Ireland Volleyball Association] (PM) Nick Meachem (NM) Sarah Baldwin (SB) Dev Kumar Parmer (DKP) Janet Inman [Observer, Volleyball England] (JI) Kevin Carpenter [Legal & Governance Advisor] (KC) Apologies Yvonne Perkins [Volleyball Wales] (YP) Irena Mihneva [Northern Ireland Volleyball Association] (IM) Ben Pipes [Performance Advisor] (BP) MEETING STARTED: 13:00 1. Introductions SS informed the board that she was attending as a proxy for Volleyball Wales. PM inform the board he was attending as a proxy for the Northern Ireland Volleyball Association. He also mentioned IM was hoping to return to the board in the future. MAF passed on apologies for BP who was currently on holiday. 2. Conflicts of interest Before the meeting began substantively, KC ensured that all board members declared any conflicts of interest the following conflicts were declared by each of the board members: RC – Honorary President, Volleyball England; President, Commonwealth beach volleyball; President, FIVB Ethics Commission; Chair, World ParaVolley Judicial Commission MAF – CEV Vice President; President, European Small Countries; Commonwealth Games director for Scotland; FIH Disciplinary Commission; FIVB Disciplinary Commission PM – Secretary General, Small Countries Europe KC – CEV Legal Chamber SB – FIVB referee BVF AGM Minutes of 11 Feb 2019 Draft v1 Subsequent to the declarations, the board agreed that none of these precluded any of the board members from the matters that were to arise during the meeting. JI kindly agreed to send a conflict-of-interest form to all of the board members for them to complete and then for the company secretary to keep on file for future meetings. 3. Approval of the minutes from the last AGM KC apologised to the board for the delay in the finalisation of the minutes from the 2018 annual general meeting. Having read the second and what KC be considered the final draft, JI wished for AW to be added in as an apology for that meeting and for there to be an amendment to reflect the fact that the changes to the position of Volleyball England in respect of the school games was due to changes by the Youth Sport Trust. PM and MAF voted in favour of the minutes. 4. Board appointments NM, SB and DKP were formally appointed to the board in the following positions: NM - Commercial Advisor, Independent Director, voting SB - Company Secretary & Treasurer, Independent Director, voting DKP - Legal & Governance Advisor, Co-opted Director, non-voting AW and MAF voted in favour of the appointments. 5. Aspiration funding RC provided the new members of the board with a brief explanation of the background to the Aspiration Funding. This included the Every Sport Matters group which is formed by under-funded sports recently. He informed the board that BP was working as the Performance Advisor, with the Scottish Volleyball Association, in particular MAF, having been kind enough to let him work on our funding bid. RC also stressed to the new directors and they should raise any questions they have about how we got to this point in the funding process and that generally their job is to challenge the board. KC then went on to explain the issues surrounding the governance action plan and in particular how the BVF are expected by UK Sport to achieve Tier 2 code compliance by the end of August, and that in order to achieve that they had asked for a governance action plan to be put in place and agreed with UK Sport by the end of this month. To achieve this the DKP was to work closely with KC to meet the necessary deadlines and to advise the board. RC informed the board that SB and himself would make sure the money would be spent correctly pursuant to the Service Level Agreements the BVF are entering into with both the Scottish Volleyball Association and Volleyball England. 2 BVF AGM Minutes of 11 Feb 2019 Draft v1 When it came to governance matters, thankfully UK Sport had accepted the governance audit by KPMG for the sportscotland governance requirements, however MAF did inform the board that there are some issued still to be resolved with UK Sport. The budget submitted as part of the funding bid to be circulated to the board by RC. There was then a discussion between the board as to how the selection process should take place by the BVF should more than one pair qualify for the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games. MAF told the board that the players were very well aware that they were playing for a ‘British’ slot. Once they are awarded any money by the Scottish Volleyball Association or Volleyball England the players are accountable in that they have to meet various milestones. MAF and RC then explained the board why around £20,000 of the funding we had received was earmarked for “social impact”. The board agreed that it was necessary that the BVF were vocal about what they were doing in respect of social impact and that this was a good way to engage with stakeholders. MEETING ADJORNED: 14:05 MEETING RECONVENED: 14:15 6. Governance and finance In respect of the general composition of the board, in line with UK Sport Code of Sports Governance requirements (and beyond) both gender and BAME representation were discussed and KC said that by having a more diverse board, although the BVF is already good in respect of female representation, would be positive for the credibility and strength of the decision-making. However, KC did point out to the board that due to the situation whereby Home Nations nominate their own representatives to sit on the board, it was not good governance practice to dictate to them who they should nominate, even if it was for diversity reasons. It was decided that SB would add a column to the board representation document that KC had put together in respect of diversity. The representation discussion then moved on to how to properly represent volleyball, beach and sitting disciplines. PM also mentioned the possibility of snow volleyball going forward. KC warned the board that if we were to appoint further people to the board in respect of each of the sports then the board will get too big and unwieldy. A better solution would be for the Performance Advisor BP to garner opinions from athletes and other participants involved in each of the disciplines, which he could then pass on to the board. JI also pointed out that if the board wanted to invite someone from one of the disciplines to speak at a meeting then the board could do so, or alternatively, the board could create a specific committee if required. When it came to future meetings of the board, for which it was agreed (and pursuant to the new articles that it was required) for there to be at least three other meetings in addition to the AGM, that these should be themed, done remotely and should last no more than one hour. 3 BVF AGM Minutes of 11 Feb 2019 Draft v1 AW offered to attend meetings in London for the bodies to which we are members when he was in London and not to charge any expenses. The next discussion was about how to calculate the budget going forward given we had not previously worked to a strict budget. After a discussion, there was a broad agreement of the board, pending further discussion between RC, SB, KC and MAF, that for the time being it will be calculated on the base of historic spending, plus the fact there is now a larger board meaning more expenses, plus an acknowledgement of inflation. NM agreed to go away and be responsible for finding web designers who would be willing to help the BVF to set up a separate but very simple website with say five pages. DKP said he would be happy to offer one of the associates of his law firm to assist with the social media aspect of the BVF and to help with any compliance/governance matters going forward. JI said she would speak to Mike Hallam at Volleyball England about the existing page the BVF has on the Volleyball England website. KC also agreed to go through all of the archive documents he had to find any administrative information required for things such as the website, social media etc. 7. Future representation at meetings on behalf of the BVF RC was of the opinion that we should have younger and more dynamic representatives to attend meetings at the British Paralympic Association, Sport and Recreation Alliance etc on behalf of the BVF. Suggestions were made to speak to the following people: Matt Roger Martine Wright Richard Campbell Kelly Claire Harvey SB kindly offered to attend meetings, however it was felt that it should be a Paralympian, especially for the British Paralympic Association meetings. There are at least 24 athletes from London 2012 and therefore there should be someone who can attend on the BVF’s behalf. Furthermore, it would be positive if it were a female representative. There was also the issue under Part 8 of the new articles about the requirements in respect of anti- doping. RC said he would approach the previous advisor who assisted the BVF up until London 2012. NM agreed to be the Senior Independent Director for the BVF, which is a requirement of the Code of Sports Governance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transgender, Gender Diverse and Non- Binary Staff and Students
    Policy on support and procedures for transgender, gender diverse and non- binary staff and students Purpose To ensure minimum standards of support, clarify expectations for all and establish consistent approaches across the University in respect of individuals wishing to discuss their gender identity. Principles • In line with our values and beliefs and in order to empower people to be the best they can, we expect all members of the University community to respect individual difference and promote inclusion. • The University will not tolerate bullying, harassment, or any form of intimidation or discrimination of those working, studying or engaging with the University. This applies to all characteristics including gender identity (which includes gender fluidity and non- binary). • We recognise that people of trans experience do not form a homogenous group and therefore employ the terms trans, gender diverse and non-binary throughout to outline our desire to respect individual difference and be inclusive. Scope • This policy applies to trans, gender diverse and non-binary students and staff (and potential students/staff) and is not restricted to those planning, going through or having been through a process of gender confirmation. • ‘Trans’ is an inclusive term for people whose experienced gender is different from that which they were assigned at birth. It is an umbrella term that covers many different trans identities. The list of terms used in this document is following the guidance of www.trans.ac.uk. • Whilst the policy does not directly cover visitors and contractors, all those who engage with the University should be treated with the same respect we provide to students and staff within an environment free from any form of bullying, harassment, intimidation or discrimination.
    [Show full text]
  • 12592 Year in Numbers(5)
    2016 A year in numbers including: 7 PwC Won people in the Coaching & SME LSEG Mentoring team 4 Person of national the Year people awards Liz in the 65 Ricoh core mentoring Dimmock events 11 team including: Supported over HM Working in Treasury 3,500 mentors & mentees Largest event for countries ISEN 900 6 people Created International standards for office move office Effective Networks networks1 Designed & Research delivered programme into women’s and 500 organisational 183 supported networks 97 events 322+ hours GB athletes of R&D into unconscious bias to create an Inclusive Leadership 30 1.77M training programme organisations employees new core team 6 members round table events 2 creating growth Patsy mindsets in Rodenburg 1 children OBE 22 World record Pam One-hour track Relph sporting cycling Women’s Open & Hockey 29 events Championships Speaker MBE Academy Worked with more than events including: Team sports achievements 133 organisations across Sarah Clarice sport, education, Winckless Natasha business & government Chung MBE Baker 4 Maggie MBE swimming Alphonsi medals public MBE workshops Charles on networking, Cousins presence and 3 impact Looking ahead Talk to us about... Mentoring Keynotes and Design, deliver, masterclasses evaluate and support Create and deliver world-class mentoring masterclasses and keynotes partnerships and to facilitate learning and programmes. change for individuals, teams and organisations. Showcase and represent inspiring pioneers from sport and business. Unconscious bias programmes Provide workshops and programmes to develop inclusive leadership competencies at all levels. Transition Support transitioning elite athletes as they prepare for the next phase of their career through an Athlete to Business mentoring scheme and network.
    [Show full text]
  • English Volleyball Association Limited
    ENGLISH VOLLEYBALL ASSOCIATION LIMITED FRAMEWORK DOCUMENT of English Volleyball Association Ltd 1 1. INTRODUCTION Volleyball England is the brand name of the English Volleyball Association Limited (referred to in this Framework as the “Association”). The Association is recognised by FIVB, CEV, World ParaVolley, ParaVolley Europe, British Volleyball, UK Sport and Sport England as the National Governing Body for volleyball, beach volleyball and sitting volleyball in England. The Association is responsible for the development, promotion and delivery of the sport of volleyball, in all its disciplines, across England. This Framework document forms part of the constitution of the Association, and supplements the Association’s Memorandum and Articles of Association (“Articles”). This Framework has been introduced as a result of the comprehensive governance review that has been carried out by the Association to set the Association up for the next stage of its development, building upon recent Sport England audits which confirmed the Association’s status as a well-governed National Governing Body. The Articles detail the categories of membership of the Association, establishment of Associations, Committees, and Commissions, organisation of member meetings, the appointment of directors, the governance of the Association by the Executive Board and other matters. This Framework builds upon the Articles by providing further, more operational or administrative details relating to: membership of the Association, the mechanisms for becoming a member of the Association and the administration of membership; the benefits available to members of the Association; the, roles, structure and administration of the Regional Associations and Area Associations, Committees and Commissions; important policies that have application across the Association’s activities; the core sports technical rules; and the disciplinary regulations dealing with disputes and appeals with the sport or its administration.
    [Show full text]
  • A Research Project to Aid Volleyball England Meet Their ‘Increasing Participation’ Funding Requirement
    A RESEARCH PROJECT TO AID VOLLEYBALL ENGLAND MEET THEIR ‘INCREASING PARTICIPATION’ FUNDING REQUIREMENT J. C. HILLS Master of Arts by Research 2016 UNIVERSITY OF BEDFORDSHIRE A RESEARCH PROJECT TO AID VOLLEYBALL ENGLAND MEET THEIR ‘INCREASING PARTICIPATION’ FUNDING REQUIREMENT by Jade Chelsea Hills A thesis submitted to the University of Bedfordshire in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts by Research September 2016 i Abstract Since 2003, National Governing Bodies of sport have had an increasing accountability for meeting the targets set within their Whole Sport Plans. Recent sport policies have reiterated the importance of gathering insight into customer needs in order to create evidence based programmes to achieve behaviour change in relation to increasing participation. This study aims to gather insight into the reasons for participation in volleyball, the barriers which prevent individuals from participating, and possible solutions to overcome those barriers and increase participation. Following a pragmatic paradigm and a grounded theory methodology, the study utilised five different research methods; an online questionnaire; telephone interviews; an email questionnaire; face-to-face interviews; and a document analysis. The main findings in this study relate to the barriers to participation and suggested solutions to overcome those barriers. The main barriers to participation found within the online questionnaire were having other commitments (n=106), lack of time (n=99) and access to facilities being limited or non-existent (n=75). With regard to suggested solutions, the main suggestions were time slots to fit individual lifestyles (n=92), knowledge of where to play (n=69) and wider volleyball coverage in the media (n=57).
    [Show full text]
  • Stakeholder Consultation
    Final Report Stakeholder consultation January 2015 CONTENTS Contents ..................................................................................................................... 2 About UK Sport ............................................................................................................ 9 Core responsibilities ................................................................................................ 9 Overview ................................................................................................................... 11 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 11 The purpose of consultation ................................................................................... 11 This report ............................................................................................................. 11 Methodology .......................................................................................................... 12 Defining the stakeholder universe .......................................................................... 13 Executive summary .................................................................................................... 14 Participant profile ...................................................................................................... 17 Stakeholder workshops .......................................................................................... 17 Written submissions ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Competitive School Sport Summary Report
    National Governing Bodies of Sport Survey Competitive School Sport Summary Report June 2014 Prepared by the TOP Foundation for Ofsted SportPark, Loughborough University, 3 Oakwood Drive, Loughborough, LE11 3QF NGB Competitive School Sport Investigation Summary Report Executive Summary In the spring of 2014 an investigation commissioned by Ofsted explored the school backgrounds, ethnicity and socioeconomic status of some of our best adult and age group international sport teams. The same investigation asked 29 National Governing Bodies of sport (NGBs) to report on their competitive school sport provision in 39 different sports; 26 (90%) NGBs agreed to take part and they reported on 35 sports. This NGBs report is part of a wider investigation being undertaken by Ofsted into competitive school sport for Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills (HMCI), Sir Michael Wilshaw, which includes a supporting report with input from headteachers. This investigation collated 6 different sets of data on the known school backgrounds of: i. Current international representatives from 14 sports (n=224) ii. London 2012 Olympic Team (n=279) iii. London 2012 Paralympic Team (n=106) iv. Players competing in national leagues in 5 sports (n=543) v. UK Sport’s Athlete Insights Survey: Olympic sports (n=606) vi. UK Sport’s Athlete Insights Survey: Paralympic sports (n=247). Analysis showed similar trends across the different data sets. The 2 Paralympic data sets provided a mean of 81% for athletes attending state schools only, 13% for independent schools only and 3% for both types of school. The 2 Olympic data sets provided a mean of 66% for athletes attending state schools only, 22% for independent schools only and 6% for both types of school.
    [Show full text]
  • Sport-And-Physical-A
    Monday 21st September 2020 Dear Prime Minister, Today we are calling on you to commit to positioning sport and physical activity at the heart of our nation’s post-Covid renewal. This appeal comes from a broad range of organisations that include governing bodies and those who represent hundreds of thousands of sports clubs and facilities. Our sports engage millions of children, young people, and adults every year. Our sector drives economic prosperity and social change in the UK, contributing over £16bn to the UK economy and employing more than 600,000 people. A report published by Sport England and Sheffield Hallam University this month showed that every £1 spent on community sport and physical activity generates nearly £4 for the English economy, providing an annual contribution of more than £85bn, with a social value – including physical and mental health and wellbeing, individual and community development – of more than £72bn. Grassroots sport, fitness, and wider recreational activity is proven to improve physical, mental, and social wellbeing. This makes our sector an essential service as our nation recovers from the damage caused by Covid-19. Prime Minister – you’ve long been a champion of the benefits of a physically active lifestyle and we were heartened to hear that commitment renewed this summer with the launch of the Government’s obesity strategy. Our combined sector is delighted to be showcasing its reach into the heart of communities this week as part of the inaugural Great British Week of Sport. However, we are united in our concern that at a time when our role should be central to the nation’s recovery, the future of the sector is perilous.
    [Show full text]
  • BUCS Sport Specific Affiliations 2021-22
    BUCS Sport Specific Affiliations 2021-22 Clubs, teams and individuals participating in certain competitions need to affiliate with their National Governing Body (NGB) or meet other requirements in order to be eligible to take part. Each sport is different. Find out your sport's requirements below. Please read through this document carefully and use the links associated to each sport to access any further relevant information. There are three sections to this document: 1) BUCS Team Championships (Leagues and Knockouts): NGB Affiliations, Memberships, Registrations etc. 2) BUCS Team Championships (Leagues and Knockouts): Other – Ranking Lists, Data Submissions etc. 3) BUCS Individual and Team Championships (Events) Most of the items in each section are compulsory requirements that MUST be met, and as a result, most carry sanctions if not completed by the published deadlines. However, there are also some others which are not compulsory requirements but that BUCS believes are valuable for members to undertake. Please read the details associated with each one for further information. Deadlines will ONLY be listed here, not on the sport specific pages or in the rules and regulations. If there are any questions not answered by the information provided, then please feel free to contact BUCS directly via email. Please note that the information within this document is subject to change. Should any updates be required then the document will be re-published, and Institution Administrators will be notified via e-mail. BUCS Sport Specific Affiliations 2021-22 – Version 2 – Thursday 2 September Page 1 of 19 1) BUCS Team Championships (Leagues and Knockouts): NGB Affiliations, Memberships, Registrations etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013-14 Open Letter from the BVF President
    Annual Report 2013-14 Open Letter from the BVF President It has been a very interesting and challenging eight months for the BVF Board. We have had a significant Board restructure with three new independent directors joining in addition to my election as the new Chair/President to replace Richard Callicott OBE, who held the position for two previous terms. I would like to thank Richard for his continuing support of the BVF as a co-opted member of the Board, as his experience and guidance will provide valuable continuity. This is particularly important as we have lost two other very experienced members of the Board: Gordon Neale OBE, who retired after a lifelong involvement with volleyball; and Wayne Coyle, President of Volleyball England, who resigned for personal reasons in June. Both were a great help in the first few months of my presidency and I am grateful for their inputs into the BVF Strategy. I would like to welcome Geoff Allen, the new Volleyball England President who replaced Wayne on the BVF Board. Lastly I wanted to thank Margaret Anne Fleming for her time on the Board until January 2014 and for continued assistance behind the scene, especially in international matters where her experience and perspective are most valuable. Given the lack of Government funding from UK Sport for any of the performance volleyball programmes, we are operating in a very challenging environment. I would like to thank Volleyball England, its Chief Executive, Lisa Wainwright, who is also the BVF Company Secretary for her and her team’s support, particularly for keeping the GB Sitting Volleyball programme alive.
    [Show full text]
  • Audit Report Write Up
    Creating sporting opportunities in every community Higher Education and Community Sport Audit 2009 Headline Findings 1 Background The last time the higher education (HE) sector conducted an audit to demonstrate the provision of sport within higher education was in 2004. The sporting landscape in England has moved forward significantly since this audit, as has HE sport. As part of building a new dynamic partnership between Sport England, BUCS 1 and Higher Education sport, consultation demonstrated that the sector felt it was imperative that Sport England gained an up-to-date picture of student sport as well as higher education institutions’ (HEI) links with community sport. 19 national governing bodies of sport (NGBs) were identified as ‘phase one’ sports based on the priority they placed on higher education to assist with the delivery of their English 2009-13 whole sport plans (Appendix 2). Initial discussions with these sports demonstrated that not every sport had a comprehensive understanding of the provision of their sport in HE and which HEIs they may wish to focus on in delivering for their sport. Therefore one of the immediate actions outlined in the HE and Community Sport Partnership Plan, published by Sport England in July 2009, was to conduct an audit. The audit template was designed by Sport England, with the assistance of BUCS and HE directors of sport. The purpose of the audit was to: • Gain an up-to-date picture of higher education sport in England. A strong message during consultation was that an audit was an important way of demonstrating and understanding what HEIs already do, what community sport partnerships they have but also identify where individual institutions may wish to do more for their students or surrounding communities.
    [Show full text]
  • England Handball Board Biographies
    England Handball Board Biographies Tracy Watkinson: Chair Tracy was elected as England Handball Chair in September 2017. Tracy is a Senior Director for Credit Suisse investment bank and brings chairing and governance experience to the role of Chair. At Credit Suisse Tracy is the Chief Operating Officer responsible for a new service company business entity. She also runs change programmes – defining strategies, and leading complex organisational and cultural change programmes. Tracy also has experience of sports governance from her time as a non- executive director at Volleyball England. Tracy’s vision as Chair is to bring a fresh independent approach - together with passion, commitment and energy – to continue to develop a culture that enables everyone to thrive. Amanda Bennett: Non-executive Director Director Amanda was appointed to the Board in April 2018. Former Wales international rugby player Amanda is Managing Director of FairPlay Ltd, which exists to support people and sports organisations. She is a specialist governance consultant with extensive experience across the sector having worked with the Welsh Rugby Union, The FA, UK Sport, International Paralympic Committee and a range of small and large governing bodies. Amanda has served as a Sport Wales Board member, and is currently a Non- Executive Director of Saracens Women Ltd. She was previously Head of Governance at UK Sport and contributed to the development of the Code for Sports Governance. She is an internationally recognised expert on women in sport, in particular women’s leadership, and previously served as Chair of European Women and Sport. Amanda continues to support and mentor aspiring female leaders in sport.
    [Show full text]
  • Have You Got What It Takes?
    England Talent Pathway Athlete Handbook 2020 Contents Hub Staff 3 Talent Pathway 4 National Volleyball Centre Camps 5-6 Holiday Inn Express, Kettering 7 Further Camp information 8 Competitions 9 The cost of participation in the pathway 10 Administration 11 Kit 12 Anti-Doping 15-16 Athlete Education 17 Social Media 18 Funding 19-20 Documentation Code of Conduct 21 Attendance Policy 22 Medical Consent Form 23 Our Staff Cadet Boys 27 Cadet Girls 28 Junior Men 29 Junior Women 30 Beach 31 12 December 2019 2 Volleyball England Staff Technical and Talent Coordinator Gillian Harrison Responsible for coordinating all the technical and talent elements of the Volleyball England strategic plan, including all National Squads in beach volleyball sitting volleyball and volleyball and educational programmes for coaches, officials and technical volunteers. T: 01509 227734 Academy Coach and Technical Lead Bertrand Olie Responsible for technical development at Volleyball England, as well as taking up an active coaching role at an academy. T: 01509 227728 Project Delivery Team Lead Vicki Carr Vicki leads on the delivery and reporting of a wide range of projects and programs, competition and events, core market activities, technical and talent initiatives and projects, income generation, marketing, business support, monitoring and evaluation. T: 01509 227729 Project Delivery Team Officer Eleanor Udall Eleanor tackles all the administration for the national teams as well as support the delivery of a wide range of projects and programs, including competition
    [Show full text]