DOCSLIB.ORG

Urannah Project Draft Terms of Reference for an Environmental Impact Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Urannah Project Draft Terms of Reference for an Environmental Impact Statement Draft terms of reference for an environmental impact statement Urannah Project November 2020 Draft terms of reference for an environmental impact statement Urannah Project 1 The Department of State Development, Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning improves productivity and quality of life in Queensland by leading economic strategy, industry development, infrastructure and planning, for the benefit of all. Copyright This publication is protected by the Copyright Act 1968. Licence This work, except as identified below, is licensed by the Department of State Development, Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 Australia licence. To view a copy of this licence, visit: http://creativecommons.org.au/ You are free to copy, communicate and adapt this publication, as long as you attribute it as follows: © State of Queensland, Department of State Development, Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning, November 2020. Third party material that is not licensed under a Creative Commons licence is referenced within this document. All content not licensed under a Creative Commons licence is all rights reserved. Please contact the Department of State Development, Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning, the copyright owner if you wish to use this material. The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders of all cultural and linguistic backgrounds. If you have difficulty understanding this publication and need a translator, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 13 14 50 and ask them to contact the Queensland Department of State Development, Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning on 07 3452 7100. Disclaimer While every care has been taken in preparing this publication, to the extent permitted by law, the State of Queensland accepts no responsibility and disclaims all liability (including without limitation, liability in negligence) for all expenses, losses (including direct and indirect loss), damages and costs incurred as a result of decisions or actions taken as a result of any data, information, statement or advice, expressed or implied, contained within. To the best of our knowledge, the content was correct at the time of publishing. Any references to legislation are not an interpretation of the law. They are to be used as a guide only. The information in this publication is general and does not take into account individual circumstances or situations. Where appropriate, independent legal advice should be sought. Copies of this publication are available on our website at www.statedevelopment.qld.gov.au and further copies are available upon request to: Department of State Development, Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning PO Box 15517 City East Qld 4002. 1 William Street Brisbane Qld 4000 (Australia) Phone: 13 QGOV (13 7468) Email: [email protected] Web: www.statedevelopment.qld.gov.au Source number D20/113412 Draft terms of reference for an environmental impact statement Urannah Project 2 Contents Part A About these terms of reference .................................................... 5 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 2. Statutory basis .......................................................................................................................... 5 3. Accredited EIS process for controlled actions under Commonwealth legislation .............. 5 4. EIS guidelines ........................................................................................................................... 6 Part B General approach and requirements for an EIS ........................... 6 6. General approach ..................................................................................................................... 6 7. Requirements of an EIS ............................................................................................................ 7 Part C EIS content and suggested structure............................................ 9 8. Executive summary .................................................................................................................. 9 9. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 9 Project proponent ................................................................................................................................... 10 The environmental impact assessment process ..................................................................................... 10 10. Project description ................................................................................................................. 10 Proposed development ........................................................................................................................... 10 Design of infrastructure .......................................................................................................................... 11 Project staging ........................................................................................................................................ 15 11. Site description ....................................................................................................................... 18 Climate ................................................................................................................................................... 19 12. Project rationale and alternatives .......................................................................................... 19 13. Planning and legislative requirements .................................................................................. 20 14. Stakeholder consultation ....................................................................................................... 20 15. Assessment of project specific matters ................................................................................ 21 Water resources ..................................................................................................................................... 21 Water quality .......................................................................................................................................... 26 Flora and fauna ...................................................................................................................................... 29 Land ....................................................................................................................................................... 32 Biosecurity .............................................................................................................................................. 35 Noise and vibration ................................................................................................................................. 36 Air ........................................................................................................................................................... 36 Transport ................................................................................................................................................ 38 Economic ............................................................................................................................................... 39 Social ..................................................................................................................................................... 41 Cultural heritage ..................................................................................................................................... 43 Draft terms of reference for an environmental impact statement Urannah Project 3 Waste management ............................................................................................................................... 44 Hazards, health and safety ..................................................................................................................... 45 Cumulative impacts ................................................................................................................................ 47 16. Matters of national environmental significance ................................................................... 49 General content ...................................................................................................................................... 50 Specific content ...................................................................................................................................... 50 Listed threatened species and communities (sections 18 and 18A) ........................................................ 57 Listed migratory species (sections 20 and 20A) ...................................................................................... 60 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (sections 24B and 24C) ........................................................................ 61 World heritage values of a declared World Heritage property (sections 12 and 15A) .............................. 64 Heritage values of a National Heritage place (sections 15B and 15C) .................................................... 65 Wetlands of international importance (sections 16 and 17B) .................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Extent and Severity of the Mackay Highlands 2018 Wildfires and The
    THE EXTENT AND SEVERITY OF THE MACKAY HIGHLANDS 2018 WILDFIRES AND THE POTENTIAL IMPACT ON NATURAL VALUES, PARTICULARLY IN THE MESIC FORESTS OF THE EUNGELLA-CREDITON AREA HINES, H. B.1, BROOK, M.2, WILSON, J.3, McDONALD, W. J. F.4 & HARGREAVES, J.5 During an unprecedented fire season in Queensland in 2018, a complex of fires burnt in the Mackay Highlands region of Queensland. Some of these fires had been burning continuously since August, but an extreme heatwave in November caused the rapid expansion of intense fire, just prior to the wet season breaking. The fires affected 12 areas of Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service (QPWS) managed estate, with approximately 71,000 ha or 41% of this estate burnt. In this paper, we document the methods used to map the extent and severity of these fires and consider the potential impacts on natural values, within QPWS managed estate. Extensive areas (57,113 ha) of eucalypt woodlands and forests were burnt. Whilst fire adapted, the extent of fire and the high proportion burnt at very high to extreme severity in these ecosystems are likely to have affected a range of significant species. Of particular concern was the area (11,217 ha) of rainforest and scrub communities burnt, particularly cloud rainforests in the Eungella-Crediton area. These are highly fire-sensitive ecosystems and our observations suggest that, even at very low fire severity, impacts are likely highly significant and long lasting. This event provides an important opportunity to assess in detail the ecological effects of fire to inform conservation management of these fire-sensitive communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of the Neotropical Infrageneric Taxa of Phyllanthus (Euphorbiaceae)
    Outline of the neotropical infrageneric taxa of Phyllanthus (Euphorbiaceae) Grady L. Webster Section of Plant Biology, University of California, Davis, California, 95616, U.S.A. ABSTRACT. The 220 described neotropical species of Phyllanthus (Euphorbiaceae) are arranged in 33 sections belonging to 8 subgenera. Descriptions are given for one new subgenus, Cyclanthera, and five new sections – Antipodanthus, Salviniopsis, Pityrocladus, Hylaeanthus, and Sellowianthus. Three new subsections are described: sect. Phyllanthus subsect. Almadenses, sect. Phyllanthus subsect. Clausseniani; and sect. Choretropsis subsect. Choretropsis. Keys to species, and enumerations of them, are provided for new or revised sections and subsections. The 800-odd species of Phyllanthus, one of the larger genera of Euphorbiaceae, have recently been tabulated by Govaerts et al. (2000), but the subgenera and sections are not indicated. The first comprehensive arrangements of sections in Phyllanthus were published by Baillon (1858) and by Grisebach (1859). Jean Müller (1863, 1866, 1873) presented a much more sophisticated system involving sections and subsections; his arrangment was followed, almost unaltered, by Pax and Hoffmann (1931). Since then, the infrageneric taxa have been summarized by Webster (1956-58; 1967a) and by Webster and Airy Shaw 1971; for taxa in Australasia). Pollen characters have proved to be very important indicators of relationship (Webster, 1956, 1988; Punt, 1967, 1987). The outline proposed here reflects changes due to ongoing revision of the neotropical species of Phyllanthus (Webster, 1967b, 1968, 1970, 1978, 1984, 1988, 1991, 1999, 2001; and ined.). In addition to a key to the subgenera and sections, the 9 subgenera and their constituent sections are enumerated. Species are enumerated for most sections except for the West Indian taxa previously treated (Webster, 1956, 1957, 1958, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Perennial Edible Fruits of the Tropics: an and Taxonomists Throughout the World Who Have Left Inventory
    United States Department of Agriculture Perennial Edible Fruits Agricultural Research Service of the Tropics Agriculture Handbook No. 642 An Inventory t Abstract Acknowledgments Martin, Franklin W., Carl W. Cannpbell, Ruth M. Puberté. We owe first thanks to the botanists, horticulturists 1987 Perennial Edible Fruits of the Tropics: An and taxonomists throughout the world who have left Inventory. U.S. Department of Agriculture, written records of the fruits they encountered. Agriculture Handbook No. 642, 252 p., illus. Second, we thank Richard A. Hamilton, who read and The edible fruits of the Tropics are nnany in number, criticized the major part of the manuscript. His help varied in form, and irregular in distribution. They can be was invaluable. categorized as major or minor. Only about 300 Tropical fruits can be considered great. These are outstanding We also thank the many individuals who read, criti- in one or more of the following: Size, beauty, flavor, and cized, or contributed to various parts of the book. In nutritional value. In contrast are the more than 3,000 alphabetical order, they are Susan Abraham (Indian fruits that can be considered minor, limited severely by fruits), Herbert Barrett (citrus fruits), Jose Calzada one or more defects, such as very small size, poor taste Benza (fruits of Peru), Clarkson (South African fruits), or appeal, limited adaptability, or limited distribution. William 0. Cooper (citrus fruits), Derek Cormack The major fruits are not all well known. Some excellent (arrangements for review in Africa), Milton de Albu- fruits which rival the commercialized greatest are still querque (Brazilian fruits), Enriquito D.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Characterization of Crude Extracts from Phyllanthus Amarus Schum
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2003 Initial characterization of crude extracts from Phyllanthus amarus Schum. and Thonn. nda Quassia amara L. using normal phase thin layer chromatography Vivian Esther Fernand Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Recommended Citation Fernand, Vivian Esther, "Initial characterization of crude extracts from Phyllanthus amarus Schum. and Thonn. and Quassia amara L. using normal phase thin layer chromatography" (2003). LSU Master's Theses. 2853. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2853 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INITIAL CHARACTERIZATION OF CRUDE EXTRACTS FROM PHYLLANTHUS AMARUS SCHUM. AND THONN. AND QUASSIA AMARA L. USING NORMAL PHASE THIN LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The School of Renewable Natural Resources by Vivian Esther Fernand B.S., University of Suriname, 1998 May 2003 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere gratitude and appreciation to my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, for the love, mercy, power, wisdom and strength He gave me throughout my life. It is by His grace and encouragement that I was able to complete this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Euphorbiaceae De Colombia Biota Colombiana, Vol
    Biota Colombiana ISSN: 0124-5376 [email protected] Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Colombia Murillo A., José Las Euphorbiaceae de Colombia Biota Colombiana, vol. 5, núm. 2, diciembre, 2004, pp. 183-199 Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Bogotá, Colombia Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=49150203 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Biota Colombiana 5 (2) 183 - 200, 2004 Las Euphorbiaceae de Colombia José Murillo-A. Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Apartado 7495, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. [email protected] Palabras Clave: Euphorbiaceae, Phyllanthaceae, Picrodendraceae, Putranjivaceae, Colombia Euphorbiaceae es una familia muy variable El conocimiento de la familia en Colombia es escaso, morfológicamente, comprende árboles, arbustos, lianas y para el país sólo se han revisado los géneros Acalypha hierbas; muchas de sus especies son componentes del bos- (Cardiel 1995), Alchornea (Rentería 1994) y Conceveiba que poco perturbado, pero también las hay de zonas alta- (Murillo 1996). Por otra parte, se tiene el catálogo de las mente intervenidas y sólo Phyllanthus fluitans es acuáti- especies de Croton (Murillo 1999) y la revisión de la ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Regulation of Ecosystem Services
    Chapter 11 Biodiversity Regulation of Ecosystem Services Coordinating Lead Authors: Sandra Dı´az, David Tilman, Joseph Fargione Lead Authors: F. Stuart Chapin III, Rodolfo Dirzo, Thomas Kitzberger, Barbara Gemmill, Martin Zobel, Montserrat Vila`, Charles Mitchell, Andrew Wilby, Gretchen C. Daily, Mauro Galetti, William F. Laurance, Jules Pretty, Rosamond Naylor, Alison Power, Drew Harvell Contributing Authors: Simon Potts, Claire Kremen, Terry Griswold, Connal Eardley Review Editors: Gerardo Ceballos, Sandra Lavorel, Gordon Orians, Stephen Pacala, Jatna Supriatna Main Messages . ............................................ 299 11.1 Introduction ........................................... 300 11.2 Terrestrial Biodiversity Effects on Supporting Services ........... 301 11.2.1 Ecosystem Resource Dynamics, with Emphasis on Primary Production 11.2.2 Ecosystem Stability, with Emphasis on Primary Production 11.3 Terrestrial Biodiversity Effects on Regulating Services ........... 307 11.3.1 Invasion Resistance 11.3.2 Direct and Indirect Interactions between Species 11.3.3 Biodiversity Effects on Climate Regulation 11.3.4 Pest and Disease Control in Agricultural Systems 11.3.5 Biodiversity Effects on Human Disease Regulation 11.4 Biodiversity Effects on the Provision of Marine Ecosystem Services ............................................. 320 11.4.1 Invasion Resistance 11.4.2 Direct and Indirect Interactions between Marine Species 11.4.3 Biodiversity Effects on Climate Regulation 11.4.4 Biodiversity Effects on Pollution and Human Disease Regulation
    [Show full text]
  • A Tribo Hippomaneae A. Juss. Ex Spach. (Euphorbiaceae Juss.) No Estado De Pernambuco, Brasil1 Valdira De Jesus Santos2 E Margareth Ferreira De Sales3
    Acta bot. bras. 23(4): 976-990. 2009 A tribo Hippomaneae A. Juss. ex Spach. (Euphorbiaceae Juss.) no estado de Pernambuco, Brasil1 Valdira de Jesus Santos2 e Margareth Ferreira de Sales3 Recebido em 11/06/2007. Aceito em 30/01/2009 RESUMO – (A tribo Hippomaneae A. Juss. ex Spach. (Euphorbiaceae Juss.) no estado de Pernambuco, Brasil). O estudo foi baseado na análise morfo- lógica de espécimes de herbários nacionais e provenientes de coletas. A tribo está representada no Estado por oito gêneros: Actinostemon Sw. (3 spp.), Mabea Aubl. (1sp.), Maprounea Aubl. (1sp.), Microstachys A. Juss.(2 spp.), Sapium P.Browne (2 spp.), Sebastiania Spreng. (1sp.), Senefeldera Mart. (1sp.) e Stillingia Garden ex L. (1sp.). Os gêneros com maior distribuição no Estado são Maprounea, Sapium e Sebastiania, ocorrendo em todas as zonas fi togeográfi cas. Actinostemon, Mabea e Senefeldera sao restritos a fl oresta atlantica. São apresentadas chaves para identifi cação dos gêneros e espécies, descrições, comentários e ilustrações. Palavras-chave: Euphorbiaceae, Hippomaneae, taxonomia, Pernambuco ABSTRACT – (The Tribe Hippomaneae A. Juss. ex Spach. (Euphorbiaceae Juss.) in Pernambuco state, Brazil). The study was based on morphological analysis of specimens from various national herbaria as well as collected material. The tribe is represented in the study area by eight genera: Actinostemon Sw. (3 spp.), Mabea Aubl. (1sp.), Maprounea Aubl. (1sp.), Microstachys A. Juss.(2), Sapium P. Browne (2 spp.), Sebastiania Spreng. (1 spp.), Senefeldera Mart. (1sp.) and Stillingia Garden ex L. (1sp.). Widely distributed genera are Sapium and Sebastiania occurring in all phytogeographical zones. Actinostemon, Senefeldera and Mabea are restricted to the Atlantic rainforest.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Impact Study
    South Walker Creek Mulgrave Resource Access: Stage 2C (MRA2C) EPBC 2017-7957 Appendix E: Ecological Impact Study Mulgrave Stage 2C Ecological Impact Study Assessment of Matters of National Environmental Significance Prepared for BHP 19 July 2018 Mulgrave Stage 2C Impact Assessment DOCUMENT TRACKING Item Detail Project Name Mulgrave Stage 2C Ecological Impact Study / MRA2C Preliminary Documentation Project Number 2251 / 8852 Liz Fisher Project Manager (07) 3503 7194 471 Adelaide St, Brisbane QLD 4000 Prepared by Loren Appleby, Renee Whitchurch, Jessie McCudden & Liz Fisher Reviewed by Ailsa Kerswell & Tom Kaveney Approved by Ailsa Kerswell Status FINAL Last saved on 19 July 2018 Cover photo Carborough Creek, ELA 2016 This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2018. Mulgrave Stage 2C Ecological Impact Study. Prepared for BHP.’ Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and BHP. The scope of services was defined in consultation with BHP, by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party. Information provided is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Biodiversity Science, Discovery, and Conservation: Case Studies from Australasia and the Pacific
    Plant Biodiversity Science, Discovery, and Conservation: Case Studies from Australasia and the Pacific Craig Costion School of Earth and Environmental Sciences Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Adelaide Adelaide, SA 5005 Thesis by publication submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology July 2011 ABSTRACT This thesis advances plant biodiversity knowledge in three separate bioregions, Micronesia, the Queensland Wet Tropics, and South Australia. A systematic treatment of the endemic flora of Micronesia is presented for the first time thus advancing alpha taxonomy for the Micronesia-Polynesia biodiversity hotspot region. The recognized species boundaries are used in combination with all known botanical collections as a basis for assessing the degree of threat for the endemic plants of the Palau archipelago located at the western most edge of Micronesia’s Caroline Islands. A preliminary assessment is conducted utilizing the IUCN red list Criteria followed by a new proposed alternative methodology that enables a degree of threat to be established utilizing existing data. Historical records and archaeological evidence are reviewed to establish the minimum extent of deforestation on the islands of Palau since the arrival of humans. This enabled a quantification of population declines of the majority of plants endemic to the archipelago. In the state of South Australia, the importance of establishing concepts of endemism is emphasized even further. A thorough scientific assessment is presented on the state’s proposed biological corridor reserve network. The report highlights the exclusion from the reserve system of one of the state’s most important hotspots of plant endemism that is highly threatened from habitat fragmentation and promotes the use of biodiversity indices to guide conservation priorities in setting up reserve networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of Flowering Plants
    This page intentionally left blank Anatomy of Flowering Plants Understanding plant anatomy is not only fundamental to the study of plant systematics and palaeobotany, but is also an essential part of evolutionary biology, physiology, ecology, and the rapidly expanding science of developmental genetics. In the third edition of her successful textbook, Paula Rudall provides a comprehensive yet succinct introduction to the anatomy of flowering plants. Thoroughly revised and updated throughout, the book covers all aspects of comparative plant structure and development, arranged in a series of chapters on the stem, root, leaf, flower, seed and fruit. Internal structures are described using magnification aids from the simple hand-lens to the electron microscope. Numerous references to recent topical literature are included, and new illustrations reflect a wide range of flowering plant species. The phylogenetic context of plant names has also been updated as a result of improved understanding of the relationships among flowering plants. This clearly written text is ideal for students studying a wide range of courses in botany and plant science, and is also an excellent resource for professional and amateur horticulturists. Paula Rudall is Head of Micromorphology(Plant Anatomy and Palynology) at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. She has published more than 150 peer-reviewed papers, using comparative floral and pollen morphology, anatomy and embryology to explore evolution across seed plants. Anatomy of Flowering Plants An Introduction to Structure and Development PAULA J. RUDALL CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521692458 © Paula J.
    [Show full text]
  • Edible Nuts. Non-Wood Forest Products
    iii <J)z o '"o ~ NON-WOODNO\ -WOOD FORESTFOREST PRODUCTSPRODUCTS o 55 Edible nuts Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations NON-WOOD0 \ -WOOD FOREST FOREST PRODUCTS PRODUCTS 55 EdibleEdible nuts by G.E. Wickens FOOD AND AGRICULTUREAGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITEDUNITED NATIONSNATIONS Rome,Rome, 19951995 The opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflectreflect opinionsopinions onon thethe partpart ofof FAO.FAO. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do notnot implyimplythe the expressionexpression ofof any anyopinion opinion whatsoever whatsoever onon thethe part of thethe FoodFood andand AgricultureAgriculture OrganizationOrganization of thethe UnitedUnited Nations concerning the legal status of any country,country, territory,territory, citycity oror area or ofof itsits authorities, authorities, orconcerningor concerning the the delimitation delimitation ofof its its frontiers frontiers or boundaries.boundaries. M-37 ISBNISBN 92-5-103748-5 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,reproduced , stored in a retrieval systemsystem,, or transmitted inin any formform oror byby anyany means, means ,electronic, electronic, mechanicalmechanical,, photocopying oror otherwiseotherwise,, without the prior permissionpermission ofof thethe copyright owner. Applications forfor such permission,permission, withwith a statementstatement of thethe purpose and extent of the reproduction,reproduction, should be addressed to the
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Plant Collections, the Guianas 1991–1993 and 1995–2000, Bruce Hoffman
    Alexander, Hoffman Alexander, Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press , Kelloff, and Funk smithsonian contributions to botany • number 101 Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press Smithson ian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Plant Collections, the Guianas • Number 101 1991–1993 and 1995–2000, Bruce Hoffman Sara N. Alexander, Bruce Hoffman, 2014 Carol L. Kelloff, and V. A. Funk SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION REQUIREMENTS FOR SMITHSONIAN SERIES PUBLICATION Emphasis upon publication as a means of “diffusing knowledge” was ALL MANUSCRIPTS ARE REVIEWED FOR ADHER- ART must not be embedded in the main text. expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan ENCE TO THE SISP MANUSCRIPT PREPARATION AND for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included STYLE GUIDE FOR AUTHORS (available on the “Submis- Figures must be original and submitted as individual TIFF or EPS files. Resolution for art files must be at least 300 dpi the following statement: “It is proposed to publish a series of reports, sions” page at www.scholarlypress.si.edu). Manuscripts not for grayscale and color images and at least 1200 dpi for line giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes in compliance will be returned to the author. Manuscripts in- art. Electronic images should measure no more than 100% made from year to year in all branches of knowledge.” This theme of tended for publication in the Contributions Series are evalu- ated by a content review board and undergo substantive peer and no less than 75% of final size when published. JPG files basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of review.
    [Show full text]