Historical State Decoration – the Order of Lāčplēsis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Historical State Decoration – the Order of Lāčplēsis The Order of Lāčplēsis Published: 12.03.2021. Historical State Decoration – The Order of Lāčplēsis In 1920’s – 1930’s, there were four official decorations in the Republic of Latvia: the Military Order of Lāčplēsis, the Order of the Three Stars, the Order of Viesturs, and the Cross of Recognition. The Military Order of Lāčplēsis is not bestowed nowadays. It was awarded from 1920 to 1928. The Military Order of Lāčplēsis and the Order of the Three Stars were awarded by the Board of the Orders. In 1938, when the Order of Viesturs and the Cross of Recognition were founded, the authority of the Board of the Order was restricted to the Order of Lāčplēsis, the other decorations being conferred by the Chapter of Orders. In 1940, the Occupation rule abolished the decorations of Latvia. After the restoration of Latvia’s independence, the Order of the Three Stars was restored on 25 October 1994. The Military Order of Lāčplēsis was the first and highest state decoration in Latvia. It was founded on the initiative of the Supreme Commander of Latvian Army Colonel Jānis Balodis. The honour was conferred on soldiers of Latvian Army and the former Latvian Riflemen Regiments for merit in military action as well as on foreigners who had taken part in the struggle for the liberation of Latvia or given other type of contribution to the founding and development of the state of Latvia. The decoration had three classes: I, II and III. The person had first to be awarded the lowest, Class III before he/she could receive higher, Classes II and I of the Order respectively (this precondition did not necessarily apply to foreigners). The medal of the Military Order of Lāčplēsis was a white enamelled fire-cross with red and golden edging. On the medallion in the centre of the face side, there was a picture of folk-hero Lāčplēsis wrestling with a bear. At the ends of the Cross, there were crossed swords. On the reverse side, there was date 11 November 1919 in a medallion, and on the hands of the cross, a phrase “Par Latviju” (For Latvia) was engraved. On the edges of the cross, there were initials H.B. engraved, which was the trademark of silversmith Hermanis Banks. The insignia of the Order consisted of a multi-ray silver star with the medal of the Order in the centre plus moiré ribbon with three red and four silvery stripes of equal width. The Military Order of Lāčplēsis was designed by J. Liberts. The holders also received a diploma designed by R. Zariņš that gave a brief description of the achievement for which the decoration had been awarded to the particular person. Bestowing the Order The date when the Army of Latvia expelled Bermondt-Avalov troops from Riga, the 11th of November 1919, is symbolically accepted as the foundation day of the Order. However, for the first time, the decoration was awarded on 11 November 1920, after the Constitutional Assembly had passed the Law on the Military Order of Lāčplēsis (on 18 September 1920). By the resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers dated 13 August 1920, the first recipients of the decoration were seven highest-ranking commanders of the Latvian Army: General Pēteris Radziņš, Colonels Mārtiņš Peniķis, Krišjānis Berķis, Jūlijs Jansons, Jānis Apinis, and Colonel-Lieutenants Oskars Dankers and Jānis Puriņš. These recipients were also appointed members of the Board of the Order. Later seven Members of the Parliament were also accepted into the Board, namely, Jānis Goldmanis, Kārlis Kasparsons, Rainis, Jūlijs Celms, Voldemārs Zāmuēls, Jānis Rubulis, and Markus Gailītis. The Board was chaired by the President of Latvia. The first President of Latvia to fulfil this mission was Jānis Čakste. Issues related to the rewarding were decided by the Board of the Military Order of Lāčplēsis, chaired by the President of Latvia. Apart from the President of Latvia, the Board consisted of seven members of the Parliament and seven holders of the highest classes of the Military Order of Lāčplēsis. Each particular case was first dealt with by a specially appointed commission in each regiment of the Army. The commissions examined each specific application, wrote a detailed description of the candidate’s achievement, summarised testimonies of the witnesses, and submitted the resulting form or list of candidates to the Minister of War who assessed it and, if it met his approval, passed it to the Board of the Order, which made the final decision. The Statutes of the Order were elaborated by A. Stalbe, a holder of the Military Order of Lāčplēsis. The Statutes consisted of 62 paragraphs describing both the procedure of the awarding, the insignia as well as the duties and rights of the holders of the decoration. The decoration had three classes and was to be awarded exclusively for military achievements on persons who had fulfilled their duty to the state by challenging and outstanding heroic deeds. Before receiving a higher Class of the Order, the holder first had to be awarded the lowest. Sixty subparagraphs of the Statutes gave a detailed description of the achievements that can earn the Order. The Statutes also described the privileges that the holder of the decoration enjoyed. They were entitled to receive the insignia of the Order free of charge, to place the pictures of the decoration on their personal stamps and stationery, to wear the military uniform during their absence from active military service and to receive medical services free of charge. The Holders of the Military Order of Lāčplēsis enjoyed a privileged treatment in military training institutions and were given preference when competing with other candidates of the same qualifications for high-ranking positions in the army or the fleet. They also were entitled to a vacation twice the typical duration and holder of a certificate of the Order could travel by rail for half the standard fee. The mortal remains of the deceased members of the Order were buried with military honours. The first Award Ceremony of the Military Order of Lāčplēsis took place on Esplanade Square in Riga on 11 November 1920, with President of Latvia Jānis Čakste personally presenting the decorations. The last meeting of the Board of the Order, dealing with issues pertaining to the awarding of the honour took place on 1 November 1928. The last Award Ceremony took place on 11 November 1928 in Liepāja with the decorations being presented by President of Latvia Gustavs Zemgals. Recipients of the Order In eight years while the Military Order of Lāčplēsis existed, decorations of Class I were conferred on 11 persons, among them were Generals Jānis Balodis and Krišjānis Berķis, Colonels Fridrihs Briedis and Oskars Kalpaks, Estonian General Johann Laidoner, Polish Marshal Jozef Pilsudsky, French Marshal Ferdinand Fosch and Genera Eugene J’neuner, King of Italy Victor Emanuel and Prime Minister Benito Mussolini and King of Belgium Albert I. Class II of the Order was bestowed to 61 people (18 Latvians and 43 foreigners), whereas Class III was conferred on 2,072 persons (1,600 soldiers of the national army, 202 former Latvian riflemen, and 271 foreigners). During the celebrations of 11 November 1929, the establishing of the Fellowship of the Holders of the Military Order of Lāčplēsis was suggested. The development of the Fellowship was completed on 19 November 1931, and it functioned until the Soviet occupation. The Fellowship resumed its activities in Esslingen, Germany in 1947. Later the Board of the Fellowship transferred its headquarters to the USA. There were sections of the Fellowship also in the UK, Australia, Canada, Switzerland, Germany, and Sweden. The Fellowship exists no longer. Once in every five years, the President of Latvia hosted a get-together evening for the families of the holders of the Military Order of Lāčplēsis. The event included a banquet and presentation of precious gifts (such as a coffee-set decorated with the symbols of the Order). On Christmas, children of the holders of the Military Order of Lāčplēsis received small gifts. As of 11 November 1933, the Fellowship of the Holders of the Military Order of Lāčplēsis issued magazine Lāčplēsis. Along with Latvians (soldiers of the Latvian Army and Latvian riflemen), the Order has been conferred on 11 Lithuanians, 47 Germans, 15 Russians, 9 Poles, 4 Jews, and 3 Belarussians. Among the holders of Class III of the decoration, there are also three women: Valija Veščunas-Jansone, Līna Čanka-Freidenfelde, and Elza Žiglevica. The Order has been conferred on soldiers of the Armies of Estonia, Poland, Finland, France, Czechoslovakia, Lithuania, Denmark, Italy, Belgium, USA, and Japan. Among the members of the Order, there are not only people but also the Fortress of Verdun, which was awarded for the heroism of its defenders during the First World War. Once there were rumours abroad that Latvian riflemen were entitled to change their decorations of the tsarist Russia (the Order of St. George or the Cross of George) for the Military Order of Lāčplēsis. It is not true. https://www.president.lv/en/order-lacplesis.
Recommended publications
  • The Decorations of the Republic of Slovenia Act (Official Consolidated
    Disclaimer: All of the translations contained on this website are unofficial. Only the original Slovene texts of the laws and regulations have legal effect, and the translations are to be used solely as reference materials to aid in the understanding of Slovene laws and regulations. The Government of the Republic of Slovenia is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the translations provided on this website, or for any consequence resulting from the use of information on this website. For all purposes of interpreting and applying law to any legal issue or dispute, users should consult the original Slovene texts published in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia. The unofficial consolidated version of the Decorations of the Republic of Slovenia Act comprises: - Decorations of the Republic of Slovenia Act (Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia [Uradni list RS], No. 1/95 of 10 January 1995), - Act Amending the Decorations of the Republic of Slovenia Act – ZOdl-A (Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia [Uradni list RS], No. 22/04 of 10 March 2004), - Decorations of the Republic of Slovenia Act – Official consolidated version – ZOdl- UPB1 (Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia [Uradni list RS], No. 69/04 of 24 June 2004). DECORATIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA ACT (Unofficial consolidated version No. 2) I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 The decorations of the Republic of Slovenia (hereinafter: decorations) are the highest distinctions awarded by the State for exceptional merit and acts of particular importance for the prosperity of Slovenia. Article 2 Decorations may be conferred on nationals of the Republic of Slovenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnicity, Class, and Local Patriotism: Change and Continuity in Riga City Government Before and After the First World War Adam Brode Ph
    ETHNICITY, CLASS, AND LOCAL PATRIOTISM: CHANGE AND CONTINUITY IN RIGA CITY GOVERNMENT BEFORE AND AFTER THE FIRST WORLD WAR Adam Brode Ph. D. Candidate in History. University of Pittsburgh. Research theme: interethnic relations and urban space in interwar Riga. The article examines Riga’s city government in the periods immediately be- fore and after the First World War from an interethnic perspective, focusing on relations between Baltic Germans and ethnic Latvians. The article argues that a simple model of one ethnic group displacing another from power is inadequate to explain the operation of city government in Riga in 1919–1934. Baltic German politicians, dominant in municipal politics before 1914, oc- cupied a subordinate but nonetheless important role in city government during the interwar period, largely based on their pre-war status. Similarly, Latvians served in city government prior to 1918, albeit in smaller numbers and lower positions than their Baltic German counterparts. Key words: Interethnic relations, interwar period, urban history, city plan- ning, Riga. INTRODUCTION In its 800-year history, the city of Riga has played many roles in relation to the territory surrounding it across the centuries. Perhaps the most radical transformation was the one from a regional administrative centre into a national capital that took place following the declaration of an independent Latvia on 18 November 1918. The metamorphosis undergone by formerly cosmopolitan Riga during the interwar period was all the more radical due to the city’s complicated ethnic composition and the historical roles played by the city’s major ethnic groups. The establishment of a new Latvian national state, even one with LATVIJAS VēSTURES INSTITūTA ŽURNāLS ◆ 2016 Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Mintis 2007-404-411.Pdf (157.0Kb)
    404 MOKSLINĖS MINTIES ŠVENTĖ – 2007 INFLUENCE OF LITHUANIAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ON LATVIAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Jānis Pleps Dr.iur.cand. of University of Latvia Keywords: Constitution, Latvia, Lithuania, Constitutional Justice. Summary In the article the author analyses influence of Lithuanian Constitutional Law on Latvian Constitutional Law. The article is dedicated to the analyses of the some similar aspects of the Constitution (Satversme) of the Republic of Latvia and the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania from 1922. Besides the main objective the article also considers the information of the Lithuanian influence on the Lat- vian constitutional praxis in general. In the second section of the article the author describes in general the Lithua- nian influence. This influence exists in constitutional legislation as well as in praxis of Latvian Constitutional Court. As the very important aspect in this influence the author mentioned the close cooperation of Latvian and Lithuanian Constitutional Courts nowadays. The third section of the article related to the analyses of the Latvian Constitu- tion (Satversme) from the perspective of the Lithuanian 1922 Constitution. The author in this section discusses content of some similar norms of the both Consti- tution. Three unclear norms of the Latvian Constitution and praxis of implemen- tation of this norms are analysed in this section of the article. Author also shows similar norms of the Lithuanian 1922 Constitution in which disputed questions are written more clearly. INTRODUCTION Often questions arise in constitutional law that cannot be answered un- equivocally within framework of national constitutional law. In such situations, the solutions can be found more convincing through the comparative analysis – by identifying countries, where there are comparable constitutional controls and similar development problems of political system and by evaluating in what way the corresponding matters are solved in other places.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 January 2000 TARNRG 600-8-22
    1 January 2000 TARNRG 600-8-22 DECORATIONS, AWARDS AND HONORS of the Tennessee Army National Guard CHAPTER 1 GENERAL 1-1. Purpose. This regulation is established to prescribe the decorations and awards for service which has been performed in the Tennessee Army National Guard. 1-2. Scope. This regulation applies only to decorations, awards, and honors presented by the Tennessee Army National Guard. Tennessee Air National Guard (TNANG) decorations and awards policy is published in a separate TNANG regulation 1-3. Federal Awards. Awards which may be awarded to National Guard members, if they meet the criteria, are shown with the applicable paragraph from AR 600-8-22. a. Medals. Award of federal medal may be made in peacetime by the Secretary of Defense or Secretary of the Army to members of the Reserve Components of the Army who are not in active federal military service. Service medals that require presence in a specific theater or war for award are not listed. These can be found in AR 600-8-22. (1) Active Component Approval. Award of these medals requires submission of DA Form 638 and accompanying justification for approval through HQ, Tennessee Army National Guard, STARC (-), ATTN: AGTN-DPER (with letter of transmittal), through HQ, Second Army to HQ, Forces Command (FORSCOM) or HQDA. AR 600-8-22 Para 3.8 DISTINGUISHED SERVICE MEDAL (DSM) For any member who has distinguished himself by exceptionally meritorious service to the Government in a duty of great responsibility. Not for exceptional performance of normal duty. AR 600-8-22 Para 2.4 DEFENSE SUPERIOR SERVICE MEDAL (DSSM) For assignment to joint staffs and other joint activities of the Department of Defense, while in a position of significant responsibility has rendered superior meritorious service.
    [Show full text]
  • National Guardsman
    THE NEW YORK NATIONAL GUARDSMAN OFFICIAL April, 1932 STATE PUBLICATION 15c The Copy TRAINING SCHEDULE—INFANTRY REGIMENT—CAMP SMITH 1932 EAST WEST EAST WEST EAST WEST EAST WEST EAST WEST EAST WEST | EAST WEST HEAD­ MACHINE GUN HOWITZER MEDICAL STAFF RIFLE CO. QUARTERS SERVICE CO. CO. CO. DEPT. DET. Regt. and Bn. CO. Day Group ARRIVAL RIFLE INST. ADV. M. G. INST. GUNNERS' GUNNERS' RIFLE INST. RIFLE INST. RANGE DETAILS AUTO-RIFLE PREP. A.M.—SUPERVISION PISTOL TEST TEST SPECIALIST MON. P.M.—EQUITATION BASIC RIFLE PREP. M. G. PREP. 37 MM. GUN 3" T.M. RIFLE PREP. RIFLE PREP. TRAINING Range Service | RIFLE REC. SPECIALIST RIFLE RANGE RIFLE ADV. AUTO-RIFLE INST. M. G. INST. M. G. REC. GUNNERS' GUNNERS' TRAINING REC. SERVICE REC. RANGE DETAILS A.M.—SUPERVISION TUES. TEST TEST SPECIALIST P.M.—EQUITATION BASIC RIFLE PREP. M. G. PREP 3" T.M. 37 MM. GUN RIFLE PREP. RIFLE PREP. TRAINING ADV. RIFLE REC. | Range Service TECHNIQUE OF FIRE RIFLE SPECIALIST RIFLE RANGE AUTO-RIFLE REC. M. G. REC. COACHL-^ 37 mm. Gun and 3" T.M. REC. TRAINING REC. SERVICE RANGE DETAILS WED. SPECIALIST TACTICAL RIDE TRAINING REGT. STAFFS BASIC RIFLE PREP. M. G. PREP. M. G. INST. PISTOL INST. RIFLE PREP. RIFLE PREP. SCOUTING— RANGE SPECIALIST TRAINING SPECIALIST TRAINING RANGE DETAILS TACTICAL OBSERVE ADV. PATROLLING COACHES SERVICE PISTOL THURS. INST. AND REC. SPECIALIST RIDE—• RIFLE CO. RIFLE INST. RIFLE INST. TRAINING BN STAFFS TRAINING BASIC RIFLE INST. M. G. INST. M. G. REC. EXPERT TEST RANGE COMBAT OBSERVE TACTICAL MUSKETRY 37 MM. GUN PRINCIPLES SPECIALIST TRAINING RANGE DETAILS ADV.
    [Show full text]
  • Appropriate Occasions Including Active Duty for Training. They May Not Be Worn While in the Active Federal Service
    appropriate occasions including active duty for training. They may not be worn while in the active Federal Service. (5) The Adjutant General’s Indivj.d,lal Award will be worn above the right pocket flap on the outer garmet and to the wearer’s left of the Presidential Citation or other Federal Awards authorized for wear above the wearer’s right pocket flap. TEXAS DECORATIONS, S~VICE I.~DALS AND OT~ AWARDS 16. Authorized Texas State Awards. Title 9~, Chapter 3, Article 5789, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, as amended contains authority for award of Texas State awards. They are as follows: a. The Texas Legislative Medal of Honor. Subsequent awards will be denoted by a bronze oak leaf cluster. b. The Lone Star Medal of Valor. Subsequent awards will be denoted by a bronze oak leaf cluster. c. The Lone Star Distinguished Service Medal. Subsequent awards will be denoted by a bronze oak leaf cluster. d. Texas Medal of Nerit. SuOsequent awards wil! be denoted by a bronze acorn. e. Federal Service Medal. Subsequent awards will be denoted by a silver star. f. Texas Faithful Service Medal. Subsequent awards will be denoted by a bronze cactus leaf. g. Other awards. (I) The Adjutant General’s Individua! Award. Subsequent awards will be denoted by a second white star. (2) The Adjutant General’s Certificate of Commendation. Subse- quent awards will be made by presentation of another certificate. h. ~hen five (5) bronze acorns or five (5) bronze cactus leaves have been awarded, a silver acorn or silver cactus leaf, as appropriate, will be substituted therefor.
    [Show full text]
  • View Into the History of Municipalities
    View into The History of Municipalities Published: 08.07.2020. Updated: 30.08.2021. The local government of Riga – called town council, city council or otherwise – since the most ancient times has been a relatively independent institution with long-standing traditions, and a significant role in it always has been plaid by its leader. Over the centuries the local government of Riga has mostly been lead by strong personalities with strategic and constructive thinking. Riga Town Council 13-20th centuries The heads of Riga, representing the town inhabitants, were mentioned in documents already in 1210. It is unknown when the first town council was formed, but the members of the town council took part in signing treaties in Riga in 1225. In the 13th century the town council governed the town and acted as legislature, but in the 14th century – also as a judicial authority. At the same time the town council managed the town protection problems, imposed taxes, represented the interests of Riga’s inhabitants in foreign affairs, signed agreements and appointed ambassadors. However, a communal assembly of Riga inhabitants preserved a great role in settling important and extraordinary problems. In the first half of the 13th century the councilmen of the town council were elected for one year, but at the end of the century already the town council itself selected successors to councilmen posts. The post of councilman position actually became a lifelong post. The rights of the town council were restricted after Riga became subordinate to the King of Poland and Lithuania, Stefan Batory (1581). Disagreements between the Riga Town Council and guilds about the right of governing the town became aggravated at the end of the 16th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrality, Democracy, and Kings: the Political Image of Sweden in the Latvian Press Before the Second World War*
    Ajalooline Ajakiri, 2012, 1/2 (139/140), 115–135 Neutrality, democracy, and kings: the political image of Sweden in the Latvian press before the Second World War* Valters Ščerbinskis The relationship between the Latvians and the Nordic countries has a long history, a consequence of sharing a geographical region. However, although there were several preconditions (first and most importantly – Protestant culture) for a similar pattern of development, in actual fact, because of the difference in political regimes, Latvian society developed along quite dif- ferent lines from society in the Nordic countries. In the nineteenth cen- tury, the area of present-day Latvia formed part of the authoritarian Rus- sian Empire, and it enjoyed democracy only after the establishment of the independent state in 1918. The course of history was interrupted in 1934, when an authoritarian regime was established in Latvia and remained in existence up to the occupation of the country by the Soviets in 1940. Mean- while, wars and revolutions passed Sweden by, and during this whole period the country developed under democratic conditions. Sweden’s economic achievements, political stability and security were exceptional in a positive sense, not only for the Baltic Sea region, but also for Europe as a whole. Thus we reach the question of the image of Sweden in Latvian society. How did Latvians view Sweden’s political system? Did they link their iden- tity in any measure with the Nordic countries – first and foremost with Sweden, the largest and most influential country in the Nordic group – and if so, then to what extent? How did the view of Sweden change over time, and how may these changes be explained? At the same time, the image of the foreign country and the course of change and development it experi- enced constitute extensive material for the study of the identity of the Lat- vians themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • The Order of the Cross of Terra Mariana 20 Years
    The Order of the Cross of Terra Mariana 20 years of Estonia. Republic of the of the President Office All reserved. rights The Order of the Cross of Terra Mariana: 20 years The Republic of Estonia bestows as gratitude and Many foreign heads of state have become recipients of the recognition various state decorations on persons whose Order of the Cross of Terra Mariana because the President activities have maintained and reinforced the independent of the Republic of Estonia bestows this highest mark of Estonian state. Such recipients include recognition on his our friends and supporters worldwide. state visits. Estonia has six state decorations and their stories are On this, the 20th anniversary of the Order of the Cross of part of the history of our country. The oldest decoration, Terra Mariana, you can learn about the recipients of this the Cross of Liberty, was instituted almost a century ago, Order and read the recollections of Priit Herodes, during the Estonian War of Independence, in recognition the heraldry expert who designed the Order of the Cross of of wartime services. Our youngest state decoration, the Terra Mariana, about the creation and the significance of Order of the Cross of Terra Mariana, celebrates its 20th this state decoration. anniversary this year. Enjoy! The Order of the Cross of Terra Mariana was instituted to honour the independence of the Estonian state. It is bestowed as the highest decoration on foreigners who have rendered special services to the Republic of Estonia. Terra Mariana: 800 years “Many lands and states have alternative poetic names that remind us of their vibrant history or distinctive natural features.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legitimacy of Orders of St
    The legitimacy of Orders of St. John : a historical and legal analysis and case study of a para-religious phenomenon Hoegen Dijkhof, H.J. Citation Hoegen Dijkhof, H. J. (2006, September 27). The legitimacy of Orders of St. John : a historical and legal analysis and case study of a para-religious phenomenon. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/4576 Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the License: Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/4576 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). THE LEGITIMACY OF ORDERS OF ST. JOHN A historical and legal analysis and case study of a para-religious phenomenon PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus Dr. D.D. Breimer, hoogleraar in de faculteit der Wiskunde en Natuurwetenschappen en die der Geneeskunde, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties te verdedigen op woensdag 27 september 2006 klokke 16.15 uur door Hendrik Johannes Hoegen Dijkhof geboren te Doetinchem in 1947 Promotiecommissie Promotoren: Prof. Dr. A.W.F.M. van de Sande Prof. Mr. J. E. Spruit (UU) Referent: Dr. A. Koster (VUA) Overige leden: Prof. Dr. E.G.E. van der Wall Prof. Dr. P.S. van Koningsveld Dr. H.L. Murre-van den Berg 2 ‘Iustum et tenacem propositi virum, non civium ardor prava iubentium, non voltus instantis tyranni, mente quatit solida,’ (Horatius, Odes 3.3.1-4) Copyright © 2006 Hans J. Hoegen Dijkhof.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2019 1 Periodical Postage Paid at Boston, New York
    GM’S POLETOWN PLANT – CONTROVERSY POLISHFROM AMERICAN START TO JOURNAL FINISH • JANUARY 2019 www.polamjournal.com 1 PERIODICAL POSTAGE PAID AT BOSTON, NEW YORK NEW BOSTON, AT PAID POSTAGE PERIODICAL POLISH AMERICAN OFFICES ENTRY ADDITIONAL AND JOURNALDEDICATED TO THE PROMOTION AND CONTINUANCE OF POLISH AMERICAN CULTURE RADWANSKA WAVES GOODBYE ESTABLISHED 1911 JANUARY 2019 • VOL. 108, NO. 1 • $2.25 www.polamjournal.com PAGE 11 POLAND, AGAIN, AT AN IDEOLOGICAL INTERSECTION • UN CLIMATE CONFERENCE ADOPTS “KATOWICE RULEBOOK” KF ACCEPTING SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATIONS • MARTIN LUTHER RECONSIDERED • THE TREATS OF POLISH KARNAWAŁ START YOUR FAMILY HISTORY JOURNEY • POLONIA PLACES: ST. FRANCIS HIGH SCHOOL, ATHOL SPRINGS, N.Y. Newsmark Ambassador’s Plaint Tones Letter Stirs Pot PHOTO: DON TREEGER / THE REPUBLICAN DUDA PRAISES LATE PRESIDENT. Late President WARSAW — The U.S. George W. Bush was a “statesman, World War II veter- ambassador to Poland trig- an, Cold War warrior, and honorary citizen of my native gered anger in Poland with Kraków,” wrote Polish President Andrzej Duda in condo- a letter to the prime minis- lences forwarded to U.S. President Donald Trump. “He ter that took his government was always a great friend of Poland and Poles.” to task over its treatment of Duda recalled the words spoken by President Bush a U.S.-owned independent at the Gdańsk shipyard workers monument in 1989: “To television station. those who think that hopes can be forever suppressed, I The November 19, 2018 say: Let them look at Poland! To those who think that free- letter from Ambassador dom can be forever denied, I say: Let them look at Po- Georgette Mosbacher cir- land! And to those who think that dreams can be forever culated in Polish media.
    [Show full text]
  • An Honours System for Ireland
    UCD GEARY INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES An Honours System for Ireland David Barrett UCD Geary Institute for Public Policy Geary WP2018/24 December 11, 2018 UCD Geary Institute Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of UCD Geary Institute. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. An Honours System for Ireland David Barrett Acknowledgements This study was completed while the author was a Postdoctoral Fellow at the UCD Geary Institute for Public Policy. The research was conducted under the guidance of Professor Philip O’Connell, Director of the Geary Institute and Professor David Farrell, UCD School of Politics and International Relations. Several civil servants provided valuable technical advice on honours and awards in an Irish context. The research was funded by a grant from the UCD Foundation. Contents Executive Summary....................................................................................................................................... 0 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Methodology...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]