Eglinton Scarborough Crosstown Project Update
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Scarborough Rapid Transit Benefits Case
SCARBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT BENEFITS CASE January 2009 Scarborough RT Benefits Case Final Report 28th January 2009 Prepared for: Prepared by: Metrolinx Steer Davies Gleave 20 Bay Street, Suite 901 1000 - 355 Burrard Street Toronto ON M5J 2N8 Vancouver, BC V6C 2G8 In Association with: Economic Development Research Group Metropolitan Knowledge International 2 SRT Benefits Case CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................. 1 PART A PROJECT RATIONALE ........................................................................... 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of Report ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Report Structure........................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Rationale............................................................................................................................................ 2 Context and Need ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Project Objectives ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Project -
Toronto Transit Commission Instructions to Tenderers
Toronto Transit Commission Instructions to Tenderers Request For Tender (Revised August 2012) Page 1 of 2 TITLE: SUPPLY OF WASTE REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL SERVICES FOR UP TO A TWO YEAR TERM TENDER NO: T31BE13226 ISSUE DATE: DECEMBER 6. 2013 Your firm is hereby invited to submit a Tender to the Toronto Transit Commission for the above stated referenced requirement as specified in this Request for Tender (RFT). INSTRUCTIONS TO TENDERERS 1 Tender Submission - The Tenderer shall complete the Tender Form including the Tender Form Price Schedule(s) and submit it in a sealed envelope with the label included as ‘Appendix A’ affixed to the front of the envelope. The Tenderer shall not show its name on this envelope. The Tenderer shall be responsible for ensuring it reviews and understands the Instructions to Tenderers, General Conditions, applicable Supplementary Conditions and Specifications, which form this Request for Tender. Sealed Tenders addressed as follows, will be received by the TTC at the 1st Floor Reception Desk until 10:00 a.m. Toronto time on MONDAY JANUARY 6, 2O14: ATTENTION: HEAD – TTC SERVICES DEPT. 1900 YONGE STREET TORONTO, ONTARIO M4S 1Z2 Any Tender received late according to the TTC’s clock will not be considered and will be returned to the respective Tenderer. Faxed or e-mailed Tenders will not be considered. The Tenderer is solely responsible to ensure that the Tender submission is delivered to the address indicated above. The TTC will not be responsible to redirect any submissions delivered in error to any other of the TTC's properties. 1.1. Tender Results - The public opening of Tenders will take place in the TTC’s Offices, 1900 Yonge Street, 15 minutes after the Tender closing time. -
Chapter 4 Environmental Impacts, Mitigation
SCARBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT REPORT CHAPTER 4 – ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING Environmental Impacts, Mitigation Measures and Monitoring SCARBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT REPORT CHAPTER 4 – ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING • Moderate (M) = a moderate probability of an interaction or the interaction has moderate 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING significance. A more detailed discussion accompanied with supporting supplemental analysis and possible mitigating measures and commitments. The implementation of the SRT may result in both positive and negative effects. Mitigation of negative • Strong (S) = a high probability of an interaction or the interaction has a high level of effects has been considered through the course of the study, including preliminary planning screening of significance. These issues are usually regulated or closely monitored by government the corridor alternatives and the development of the preferred transit project. However, given that some agencies and will require detailed analysis to quantify the potential impact and the negative effects cannot be totally avoided, mitigation measures are required during construction and anticipated effect of mitigation measures. Future commitments for elements with strong operation of the SRT. interactions are addressed by this project. The Transit Projects Regulation (Ontario Regulation 231/08) Section 9 (2) requires the proponent to The interactions matrix helped to establish the scope of the environmental assessment and reveal which prepare an environmental project report that contains the following information, among other requirements: project components have a significant interaction with environmental components. The interactions matrix is presented in Table 4-1 and considers all facets of the environment including: • An assessment and evaluation of the impacts that the preferred method of carrying out the transit project and other methods might have on the environment. -
Community Update
Community Update Presented to: Leaside Property Owners’ Association Presented by: Jack Collins, Metrolinx 23/11/2011 Presentation • Who is Metrolinx? • Project Overview and Progress • East Tunnel • Stations • Community Relations 11/23/2011 LPOA Community Update 2 Created in 2006 for the purpose of providing residents and businesses in the GTHA a transportation system that is modern, efficient and integrated We plan. We deliver. We integrate. Divisions of Metrolinx Projects Underway Projects underway Conceptual map – not to scale Map does not include regional GO rail or bus expansions or improvements These projects represent a $16.5 billion investment by the provincial, municipal and federal governments. But we need much more. An additional $2 billion a year over the next 25 years will be required to implement The Big Move. Metrolinx is developing an Investment Strategy to fund this program. 14 Project Overview: Map Facts and Figures  25 km east-west transit corridor between Scarborough Centre and Jane Street / Black Creek Drive  19 km of tunnelled transit along Eglinton connected with continuous through-running service along upgraded SRT alignment (6 km, elevated and at-grade, 0.5 km tunnelled) to Scarborough Centre (McCowan Station)  60% faster than bus service today (e.g. Only 35 minutes from Jane to Kennedy)  Up to 26 stations  Estimate for the combined project is $8.4 Billion (2010$) – 100% funded by the Province of Ontario Key Responsibilities for Project • Metrolinx owns the transit asset and is responsible for decisions on -
UPPER CANADA RAILWAY SOCIETY BOX 122 STATION "A" TORONTO, ONTARIO S&H 1009, Ex-CNR 1009, After Rebuilding and Repainting at Hillsborough Shop, April 19, 1986
INCORPORATED 1952 NUMBER 444 OCTOBER 1986 UPPER CANADA RAILWAY SOCIETY BOX 122 STATION "A" TORONTO, ONTARIO S&H 1009, ex-CNR 1009, after rebuilding and repainting at Hillsborough shop, April 19, 1986. S&H RSI 8208 leads a two-car train comprising a heavy• weight coach and a former CN arch roof car built in the mid-1930s (5200 series). OCTOBER 1986 3 Tourist Train Excursions sixum AN JMJKSBOKOIJGI l startup and History The origins of this tourist railroad in central New Brunswick lie in a combination of three major events: the closure of the Canadian Gypsum Co. wallboard plant in Hillsborough in 1980; the application by CN to abandon the 24 mile branch (the Albert Sub.) serving the plant; and the existence of a strong and determined rail buff group in the province. The closure of the wallboard plant, during a time of severe economic recession, led to the purchase of all of the gypsum company property by the Community Improvement Corporation in the name of the Province of New Brunswick, with a view to creating some employment opportunitles_.__I)uring this time, and even up until this day, CN in this area has been very co-operative in the attempt to create these opportunities, since the railway was facing major layoffs at the same time. The Federal Goyemment,^ through the Local Employment Assistance Program (LEAP), was also receptive to worthwhile proposals. With the groundwork laid and the existence of the Canadian Railroad Historical Association museum in Delson, Quebec providing a good supply of suitable steam locomotives and passenger cars, the work started. -
Lrt Projects in Toronto - Status Report Information Item
Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: May 1, 2012 SUBJECT: LRT PROJECTS IN TORONTO - STATUS REPORT INFORMATION ITEM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Commission receive this report for information. FUNDING This report does not have direct funding implications for the TTC. BACKGROUND The Province of Ontario and Metrolinx have committed $8.4 billion to new transit in Toronto. In 2007, the Commission adopted a plan for light rail transit (LRT) lines to provide faster, more reliable, accessible transit on the busiest, most congested corridors in Toronto, and directed staff to commence the preliminary planning and environmental assessments for the projects. In November 2008, Metrolinx adopted the Big Move Transportation Plan for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area. The Big Move top 15 priority projects for early implementation included the Sheppard East LRT, Finch West LRT, Eglinton Crosstown LRT and the Scarborough RT. In May and April 2009, the Province of Ontario announced funding for the Eglinton Crosstown LRT, Scarborough RT conversion and extension, Finch West LRT and, with a federal contribution, Sheppard East LRT. Also in early 2009, the Province of Ontario amended the Metrolinx Act 2006 bringing into force provisions for Metrolinx to own and control transit projects and be responsible for decisions regarding scope, budget, schedule and delivery. Metrolinx, TTC and the City of Toronto developed a governance structure for the transit project implementation whereby TTC would deliver the projects on behalf of Metrolinx. An Interim Funding Memorandum of Agreement provided Metrolinx funding to the TTC to carry on with the project LRT PROJECTS IN TORONTO – STATUS REPORT Page 2 implementation with Metrolinx responsible for award of contracts and payment to consultants, the TTC staff working on the project and contractors. -
Toronto Transit Commission CEO’S Report August 2018
Toronto Transit Commission CEO’s Report August 2018 TTC performance scorecard 2 CEO’s commentary and 6 current issues Critical paths 9 Performance Updates: Safety & Security 16 Customer 20 People 48 Assets 52 Toronto Transit Commission CEO’s Report August 2018 TTC performance scorecard Current Ongoing Key Performance Indicator Description Latest Measure Current Target Page Status Trend Safety and Security Lost Time Injuries Injuries per 100 Employees June 2018 6.09 4.44* 16 Customer Injury Incidents Injury Incidents per 1M Boardings June 2018 0.81 1.07* 17 Offences against Customers Offences per 1M Boardings June 2018 0.66 1.00 18 Offences against Staff Offences per 100 Employees June 2018 5.08 3.83* 19 Customer: Ridership TTC Ridership June 2018 51.0M 52.5M 20 TTC Ridership 2018 y-t-d to June 271.6M 280.0M NA 20 PRESTO Ridership June 2018 13.3M 16.7M 21 PRESTO Ridership 2018 y-t-d to June 65.9M 71.7M NA 21 Wheel-Trans Ridership June 2018 401K 455K 22 Wheel-Trans Ridership 2018 y-t-d to June 2,129K 2,434K NA 22 Ongoing trend indicators: Favourable Mixed Unfavourable * Represents current 12-month average of actual results 2 Toronto Transit Commission | CEO’s Report | August 2018 Current Ongoing Key Performance Indicator Description Latest Measure Current Target Page Status Trend Customer: Satisfaction Customer Satisfaction score Q2 2018 77% 82% 23 Customer: Environment Station Cleanliness Audit Score Q2 2018 77.5% 75% 24 Streetcar Cleanliness Audit Score Q2 2018 92.8% 90% 25 Bus Cleanliness Audit Score Q2 2018 92.0% 90% 26 Subway Cleanliness -
Report of the Expert Advisory Panel Regarding Transit on Sheppard Avenue East
Report of the Expert Advisory Panel Regarding Transit on Sheppard Avenue East March 15, 2012 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Panel Letter to Toronto City Council...................................................................................... 4 2. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 6 3. Background ............................................................................................................................. 8 4. Transit Options for Sheppard Avenue East .......................................................................... 11 5. City Planning: Official Plan Considerations ......................................................................... 14 6. Financial Considerations ....................................................................................................... 20 7. Panel's Options Analysis ....................................................................................................... 39 8. Beyond Sheppard: A Sustainable Transit Future for Toronto .............................................. 55 9. Recommendations ................................................................................................................. 58 10. Appendices ............................................................................................................................ 59 Appendix A: Option A, LRT from Don Mills to Morningside ....................................................................... 59 Appendix -
UPPER CANADA RAILWAY SOCIETY BOX 122 STATION "A" TORONTO, ONTARIO Photo
INCORPORATED 1952 NUMBER 460 FEBRUARY 1988 UPPER CANADA RAILWAY SOCIETY BOX 122 STATION "A" TORONTO, ONTARIO Photo TTC ALRV 4204 arrives at Humber Loop for the inaugural ceremony January 19. See article this issue. — TTC photo The TTC Harbourfront LRT Line right-of way, takes shape, in this December 1987 view looking east along Queen's Quay. — TTC photo After completing more than two years of testing, CP Rail has awarded a contract for the installation of North America's first Pack-Track roadbed system, in the tunnels on the railway's Rogers Pass Project in British Columbia. The concrete roadbed/track clip system is expected to reduce greatly the need for closing the line for maintenance. — CP Rail photo FEBRUARY 1988 3 CANADMN BY RICH ABB CARROLL Initial VIA Time (Best) (Apr. 1, 1979) Best VIA Time Current Best Best Ever (1st year) (Nov. 29, 1987) (1st year) Halifax-Moncton 4-40 t3-55 (1987) 3-55 3-55 (1987) Halifax-St. John (A) 6-35 5-50 (1985) 5-50 5- 50 (1985) Moncton-Campbellton 4-05 3-30 (1986) 3-30 3- 30 (1986) Moncton-Edmiiindston 4-50 4-30 (1984) 4-30 4- 30 (1984) Montreal-Sherbrooke(G) 2-15 2-10 (1981) 2-10 1- 59 (1965) Mtl.-Quebec City (B) 3-00 3-00 (1987) 3-00 2- 59 (1966) Mtl.-Ottawa 2-05 1-55 (1982) 2-00 1-49 (1975) Mtl.-Toronto 4-30 4-25 (1981) 4-30 3- 59 (1968) Ottawa-Toronto 5-45 3-59 (1984) 4-00 3-59 (1984) Toronto-North Bay (C) 4-35 4-35 (1979) 4-43 (C) 4 -35 (1978) Toronto-Timmins(C) 10-05 10-05 (1979) 10-20 10-05 (1978) Toronto-Chicago (D) 10-35 10-00 (1987) 10-00 10-00 (1963) Toronto-Windsor 4-00 3-55 (1982) 3-55 3-45 (1973) Toronto-London 2-00 1-53 (1987) 1-53 1-53 (1987) Toronto-Sarnia 3-10 3-00 (1987) 3-00 3-00 (1987) Toronto-Stratford 2-03 1-50 (1987) 1-51 1-50 (1987) Toronto-New York (F) 11-55 11-03 (1987) 11-03 11.-00 (1937) Thunder Bay-Wpg. -
Training Calendar Report for Specific Courses Only
Run Date: 2016-01-18 Report: 0309-PATHLORE-0018 Run Time: 12:25:18 pm Report Version: 004 Training Calendar Report Course Name: RT/SUPV - TOWER & CROSSOVER RECERTIFICATION Course Code: RTS523 Class Size - Min: 1 Max: 3 Target Audience: This course is for currently qualified route supervisors, chief route supervisors, Transit Control tower controllers, and station managers. Course Duration: 0 day(s). Course Description: The course reviews and updates material from RT/Supv – Tower & Crossover Initial. Course Objectives: Upon completion of this course, participants will: • Be recertified in the operation of the Auxiliary Panels. • Understand the role of a route supervisor. • Be able to meet all TTC customer service standards. • Be able to communicate and interact with other departments, such as Transit Control, divisional management, and emergency agencies. • Be able to perform troubleshooting and disablement procedures. • Be able to perform emergency remedial including cranking and clamping switch. • Understand policies and procedures dealing with tower panels and crossover practices on the Yonge/University/Spadina, Sheppard, Bloor/Danforth, and SRT lines. • Understand rules and regulations. Prerequisites: • RT/Supv – Tower & Crossover Initial (RTS522). Other Requirements: Participants must: • Attend with full personal protective equipment issued by the TTC. Materials: All material is provided on the first day of training. Delivery Method: Instructional Led Training Training Location: Greenwood - Greenwood Yard Recertification: Every two -
Toronto's Transit Expansion Program
EX4.1 ATTACHMENT 2 LINE 2 EAST EXTENSION Introduction After more than 30 years of service, the vehicles that run on Line 3 Scarborough are reaching the end of their normal lifespan. An integrated and comprehensive rapid transit system is required to continue to provide transit that benefits users in Scarborough and across Toronto. In October 2013, City Council approved a full funding commitment to a proposal to extend the TTC Line 2 subway along the McCowan Road corridor to Sheppard Avenue East. Since 2013, the Line 2 East Extension ("L2EE") project has advanced through the project lifecycle, and several reports have been brought forward to the TTC Board and City Council for consideration and approval to confirm the project scope, preferred alignment, procurement model, and integration with broader city planning Figure 1. objectives. Line 2 East Extension Overview The last report on the project was in March 20171 at which point City Council approved an extension from Kennedy Station to Scarborough Centre via the McCowan alignment. Per City Council direction, the project scope also includes coordination with future transit and road infrastructure projects as well as other city-building initiatives planned for Scarborough Centre. The L2EE project is now ready to proceed to procurement and construction. A Class 3 cost estimate, Level 3 schedule and risk analysis have been prepared and the results are documented in this attachment. Consistent with the recommendations of the TTC Capital Program Delivery Review,2 the project has conducted a formal detailed risk assessment, resulting in risk-adjusted estimates that better capture potential delays and costs. -
0309-Pathlore-0018 Training Calendar Report
Training Calendar Report 0309-Pathlore-0018 Report Parameter(s): Course Code: Course Category: Course Owner: Train&DD Start Date: 2021/01/07 End Date: 2021/12/31 Run Date: 2021-01-07 Report: 0309-PATHLORE-0018 Run Time: 6:39:28 pm Report Version: 004 Training Calendar Report For the period of Thu Jan 07, 2021 - Fri Dec 31, 2021 Course Name: BUS GARAGE OPERATOR - INITIAL Course Code: BGO112 Class Size - Min:1 Max: 2 Target Audience: This course is for bus maintenance employees required to operate vehicles in the garage, yard, or on the street in non-revenue service. Course Duration: 120.00 hour(s). 15 session(s). Course Description: The course covers operational aspects of garage and yard procedures, vehicle inspection, equipment and disablements, fuel line service, and street operation. Written, yard, and on-road driving tests are also included. Course Objectives: Upon completion of this course, participants will: • Be recertified as bus garage operators. • Understand the role of a bus garage operator. • Understand hoist and fuel buggy procedures. • Be able to perform garage and yard procedures. • Be able to perform vehicle inspections and disablements. • Be able to operate various bus models safely. • Be able to perform fuel line service and street operation. • Understand workplace safety and WHMIS. • Understand regulations, including: workplace violence and harassment, fitness for duty and fatigue awareness, assault prevention, and defensive driving. • MTO requirements Prerequisites: • BGO Pre-Test (BGO900). Other Requirements: Participants must: • Have a valid, non-probationary class G driver's licence. • Complete an MTO medical examination for a class C licence. • Complete a vision test.