SHRINKING SPACE for FOREIGN-FUNDED ORGANIZATIONS in DEMOCRACIES: HUNGARY and ISRAEL Kinga Zs
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TRANSPARENCY VS. DELEGITIMIZATION? SHRINKING SPACE FOR FOREIGN-FUNDED ORGANIZATIONS IN DEMOCRACIES: HUNGARY AND ISRAEL Kinga Zsofia Horvath Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, Indiana University December 2018 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Master’s Thesis Committee ____________________________________ Catherine Herrold, Ph.D., Chair ____________________________________ Kathi Badertscher, Ph.D. ____________________________________ Carol Adelman, Ph.D. ii DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis to students with the interest in global philanthropy, researchers focusing on international giving, practitioners working with foreign-funded NGOs, and policy-makers seeking to create enabling environment for philanthropy. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Foremost I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my chair Dr. Catherine Herrold for the continuous support of my thesis, for her patience, and immense knowledge. Besides my chair, I would like to thank the rest of my thesis committee: Dr. Kathi Badertscher and Dr. Carol Adelman for their insightful comments and encouragement. Their guidance and expertise helped me write this thesis. I would like to thank Fulbright Hungary, the Rosztoczy Foundation, the Pallas Athene Domus Animae Foundation, and the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy for giving me the opportunity to study and conduct research on global philanthropy due to their generous financial support. My sincere thanks also goes to Dr. Anna Pruitt and Dr. Kathi Badertscher for proofreading and editing this thesis and make sure that my – often complicated – Hungarian thoughts turned into well-designed English words, sentences and sections. I would like to also thank Dr. Xiaonan Kou and Erna Burai for being my role models and immense sources of encouragement. Their guidance and support – as PhD students, supervisors, and friends – have been invaluable in my academic journey. Last but not least, I would like to thank my parents: Anyu and Apu, my brother: Danika, and all my friends from both sides of the Atlantic Ocean for supporting me throughout writing this thesis and completing my degree. Experiencing their kindness, encouragement, and generosity across countries and time zones has helped me study global philanthropy and finish those projects that never really seems to end. iv Kinga Zsofia Horvath TRANSPARENCY VS. DELEGITIMIZATION? SHRINKING SPACE FOR FOREIGN-FUNDED ORGANIZATIONS IN DEMOCRACIES: HUNGARY AND ISRAEL The shrinking space for civil society and the increasing number of unfavorable legislation affecting the work of non-governmental organizations continue to be burning issues for global philanthropy. Using a case study approach, this thesis explores how democracies regulate the operation of foreign-funded non-governmental organizations in Hungary and Israel. This thesis examines what the presumed and real motivations of democratic governments are to adapt such regulations and how the political, economic and socio-cultural environments might influence their enactment. This thesis also compares the Hungarian and Israeli regulations to the 1938 Foreign Agents Registration Act. Catherine Herrold, Ph.D., Chair v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................. viii INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER ONE: HAVING A CLEAR PERSPECTIVE – THEORIES, CONCEPTS, AND AREAS OF RESEARCH FOCUS ............................................................................................................................ 5 1.1. Nongovernmental organizations vs. civil society organizations ...................................... 6 1.2. The development of NGOs and their roles in democracy ............................................... 8 1.3. Shrinking civil society, a global phenomenon ................................................................ 10 1.4. Foreign-funded NGOs, as unknown factors in the equation ......................................... 18 1.5. OECD countries under the microscope .......................................................................... 20 1.6. Main regulations for cross-border financial flows ......................................................... 28 1.6.1. Legislation on illicit financial flows, anti-money laundering, and combating the financing of terrorism ...................................................................................................... 28 1.6.2. Foreign Agent Laws ................................................................................................ 31 CHAPTER TWO: GENERAL OVERVIEW OF HUNGARY AND ISRAEL .............................................. 34 CHAPTER THREE: HUNGARY AND THE ACT ON THE TRANSPARENCY OF ORGANIZATIONS RECEIVING SUPPORT FROM ABROAD .......................................................................................... 42 3.1. The way towards “Hungarian illiberal democracy” ....................................................... 43 3.2. Hungarian legislation to enhance CSO transparency and prevent money laundering .................................................................................................................................. 48 3.3. Foreign-funded NGOs under government attack .......................................................... 50 3.3.1. Government critics and government-related studies prior to the announcement of the draft law ...................................................................................................................... 50 3.3.2. Changing rhetoric and preliminary opinion of the Venice Commission ...................... 55 3.3.3. Act LXXVI of 2017 on the Transparency of Organizations Receiving Support from Abroad.................................................................................................................................... 61 3.3.4. Intensifying negative government campaign, legal consequences, and an opaque future ..................................................................................................................................... 63 CHAPTER FOUR: TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENTS FOR PARTIES SUPPORTED BY FOREIGN STATE ENTITIES LAW, 5776-2016 .................................................................................................. 70 4.1. The Israeli nonprofit sector ............................................................................................ 71 4.2. Israeli laws to enhance NGO transparency and prevent money laundering ................. 75 4.3. Foreign-funded NGOs under government attack .......................................................... 78 4.3.1. Government statements and amendments related to foreign-funded NGOs ...... 78 vi 4.3.2. Transparency Requirements for Parties Supported by Foreign State Entities Law, 5776-2016 ...................................................................................................................... 79 4.3.3. Domestic and international criticism ..................................................................... 81 CHAPTER FIVE: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE HUNGARIAN AND ISRAELI FOREIGN AFENTS REGULATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 84 5.1. What is the truth about the relationship between the 1938 FARA and the recently adopted foreign agents regulations? ......................................................................................... 84 5.1.1. Foreign Agents Registration Act, 1938 ........................................................................ 85 5.1.2. Comparison between the Hungarian, Israeli, and the U.S. foreign agents regulations ............................................................................................................................. 87 5.2. Stigmatization and delegitimization instead of transparency and public trust .................. 90 5.3. Recommendations for finding the balance between national security and flourishing civil society ................................................................................................................................. 92 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................. 96 EPILOGUE ..................................................................................................................................... 100 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................. 103 CURRICULUM VITAE vii LIST OF TABLES Table One: Overview of OECD Member States………………………………………………………………………….13 Table Two: Foreign-funded NGO Laws around The World…………………………………………………………22 Table Three: Comparison between the Hungarian, Israeli, and U.S. Foreign Agents Regulations……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….88 viii INTRODUCTION Foreign agents regulations and laws affecting the operation of foreign-funded non- governmental organizations (NGOs) have increased in the last decade. Indeed, since 2012, 98 laws restricting freedom of association or assembly were adopted around the world (Rutzen, 2015),