DOCSLIB.ORG

Projet D'extension Et De Renforcement Du Reseau De Distribution De La Commune De Katiola

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Projet D'extension Et De Renforcement Du Reseau De Distribution De La Commune De Katiola REPUBLIQUE DE COTE D’IVOIRE Public Disclosure Authorized Union – Discipline – Travail -------------------------------- MINISTERE DU PETROLE, DE L’ENERGIE ET DU DEVELOPPEMENT DES ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES --------------------------------- PROJET DE TRANSPORT, DE DISTRIBUTION ET D’ACCES À L’ELECTRICITE (PTDAE) --------------------------------- PROJET D’EXTENSION ET DE RENFORCEMENT DU RESEAU DE DISTRIBUTION DE LA COMMUNE DE KATIOLA Public Disclosure Authorized --------------------------------- Public Disclosure Authorized PLAN D’ACTION DE REINSTALLATION (PAR) DES POPULATIONS AFFECTEES PAR LE PROJET -- RAPPORT PROVISOIRE -- Public Disclosure Authorized -- Mai 2018 -- TABLE DES MATIERES LISTE DES TABLEAUX................................................................................................................................................. 3 LISTE DES PLANCHES ................................................................................................................................................. 3 LISTE DES ABREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................................................ 4 DEFINITIONS DES TERMES ....................................................................................................................................... 5 RESUME EXECUTIF ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................ 12 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................... 15 1. DESCRIPTION DU PROJET ET LOCALISATION DE LA ZONE D’INTERVENTION ............................... 17 1.1 Description du Projet ............................................................................................................................................ 17 1.1.1 Présentation du promoteur du Projet ................................................................................................................... 17 1.1.2 Consistance du Projet .......................................................................................................................................... 17 1.2 Localisation de la zone d’intervention du projet .................................................................................................... 18 2. IMPACTS DU PROJET SUSCEPTIBLES D’ENGENDRER LA REINSTALLATION .................................... 19 2.1 Activités susceptibles d’engendrer la réinstallation ............................................................................................... 19 2.2 Impacts socioéconomiques du projet ...................................................................................................................... 19 2.2.1 Impacts socioéconomiques positifs ..................................................................................................................... 19 2.2.2 Impacts socio-économiques négatifs ................................................................................................................... 20 2.3 Alternatives envisagées pour minimiser le déplacement de personnes ................................................................ 20 3. ETUDE SOCIOECONOMIQUE ET IDENTIFICATION DES PERSONNES AFFECTEES PAR LE PROJET .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 3.1 Etude socioéconomique ............................................................................................................................................ 22 3.1.1 Démarche méthodologique ................................................................................................................................. 22 3.1.2 Résultats de l’étude socioéconomique ..................................................................................................................... 22 3.2 Identification des Personnes Affectées par le Projet dans la commune de Katiola ............................................. 23 3.2.1 Répartition des PAPs par sexe ............................................................................................................................ 23 3.2.2 Répartition des PAPs par type de construction................................................................................................... 23 3.2.3 Répartition des PAPs par type d’activités ........................................................................................................... 24 4. CADRE JURIDIQUE ET INSTITUTIONNEL ....................................................................................................... 26 4.1 Cadre juridique ......................................................................................................................................................... 26 4.1.1 Principales dispositions juridiques nationales ..................................................................................................... 26 4.1.3 Comparaison entre le cadre juridique national et la politique opérationnelle PO de la Banque mondiale .......... 31 4.2 Cadre institutionnel .................................................................................................................................................. 35 4.2.1 Les organismes publics nationaux ...................................................................................................................... 35 4.2.2 Les organismes internationaux ............................................................................................................................ 36 5. ELIGIBILITE AU PAR .......................................................................................................................................... 38 5.1 Critères d’éligibilité des personnes affectées par le projet au PAR...................................................................... 38 5.2 Date butoir ................................................................................................................................................................. 38 5.3 Personnes éligibles .................................................................................................................................................... 38 5.4 Groupes vulnérables ................................................................................................................................................. 39 6. EVALUATION DES PERTES ET LEURS MESURES DE COMPENSATION ................................................. 40 6.2.1 Méthodes d’évaluation pour la perte des bâtis ................................................................................................. 40 6.2.2 Méthode d’évaluation pour l’indemnisation de la perte des revenus. .............................................................. 41 7. MESURES DE REINSTALLATION ............................................................................................................... 42 1 7.1 Montant des indemnisations et autres mesures compensatoires........................................................................... 42 7.1.1 Indemnisation pour perte de bâtis ....................................................................................................................... 42 7.1.2 Indemnisations pour la perte de revenu des propriétaires des activités commerciales ....................................... 42 7.2 Sélection, préparation du site, et relocalisation ...................................................................................................... 43 7.3 Infrastructures et services sociaux .......................................................................................................................... 43 8. DISPOSITIF DE MISE EN ŒUVRE DU PAR ....................................................................................................... 45 8.1 Comité de Pilotage du PAR (CP-PAR). ............................................................................................................... 45 8.2 Comité de Suivi du PAR ........................................................................................................................................... 45 8.3 Cellule d’Exécution du PAR .................................................................................................................................... 45 8.4 Responsabilités dans la mise en œuvre du PAR ..................................................................................................... 46 9. CONSULTATION ET INFORMATION ................................................................................................................ 48 9.1 Objectifs ..................................................................................................................................................................... 48 9.2 Consultation des parties prenantes au projet ......................................................................................................... 48 9.2.1 Information, sensibilisation et consultation de la population .............................................................................. 48 9.2.2 Organisation des réunions d’information, de consultation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ADMINISTRATIVE MAP of COTE D'ivoire Map Nº: 01-000-June-2005 COTE D'ivoire 2Nd Edition
    ADMINISTRATIVE MAP OF COTE D'IVOIRE Map Nº: 01-000-June-2005 COTE D'IVOIRE 2nd Edition 8°0'0"W 7°0'0"W 6°0'0"W 5°0'0"W 4°0'0"W 3°0'0"W 11°0'0"N 11°0'0"N M A L I Papara Débété ! !. Zanasso ! Diamankani ! TENGRELA [! ± San Koronani Kimbirila-Nord ! Toumoukoro Kanakono ! ! ! ! ! !. Ouelli Lomara Ouamélhoro Bolona ! ! Mahandiana-Sokourani Tienko ! ! B U R K I N A F A S O !. Kouban Bougou ! Blésségué ! Sokoro ! Niéllé Tahara Tiogo !. ! ! Katogo Mahalé ! ! ! Solognougo Ouara Diawala Tienny ! Tiorotiérié ! ! !. Kaouara Sananférédougou ! ! Sanhala Sandrégué Nambingué Goulia ! ! ! 10°0'0"N Tindara Minigan !. ! Kaloa !. ! M'Bengué N'dénou !. ! Ouangolodougou 10°0'0"N !. ! Tounvré Baya Fengolo ! ! Poungbé !. Kouto ! Samantiguila Kaniasso Monogo Nakélé ! ! Mamougoula ! !. !. ! Manadoun Kouroumba !.Gbon !.Kasséré Katiali ! ! ! !. Banankoro ! Landiougou Pitiengomon Doropo Dabadougou-Mafélé !. Kolia ! Tougbo Gogo ! Kimbirila Sud Nambonkaha ! ! ! ! Dembasso ! Tiasso DENGUELE REGION ! Samango ! SAVANES REGION ! ! Danoa Ngoloblasso Fononvogo ! Siansoba Taoura ! SODEFEL Varalé ! Nganon ! ! ! Madiani Niofouin Niofouin Gbéléban !. !. Village A Nyamoin !. Dabadougou Sinémentiali ! FERKESSEDOUGOU Téhini ! ! Koni ! Lafokpokaha !. Angai Tiémé ! ! [! Ouango-Fitini ! Lataha !. Village B ! !. Bodonon ! ! Seydougou ODIENNE BOUNDIALI Ponondougou Nangakaha ! ! Sokoro 1 Kokoun [! ! ! M'bengué-Bougou !. ! Séguétiélé ! Nangoukaha Balékaha /" Siempurgo ! ! Village C !. ! ! Koumbala Lingoho ! Bouko Koumbolokoro Nazinékaha Kounzié ! ! KORHOGO Nongotiénékaha Togoniéré ! Sirana
    [Show full text]
  • Côte D'ivoire
    AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FUND PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT HOSPITAL INFRASTRUCTURE REHABILITATION AND BASIC HEALTHCARE SUPPORT REPUBLIC OF COTE D’IVOIRE COUNTRY DEPARTMENT OCDW WEST REGION MARCH-APRIL 2000 SCCD : N.G. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS, WEIGHTS AND MEASUREMENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS, LIST OF ANNEXES, SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS BASIC DATA AND PROJECT MATRIX i to xii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN 1 2.1 Project Objectives 1 2.2 Project Description 2 2.3 Project Design 3 3. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 3 3.1 Entry into Force and Start-up 3 3.2 Modifications 3 3.3 Implementation Schedule 5 3.4 Quarterly Reports and Accounts Audit 5 3.5 Procurement of Goods and Services 5 3.6 Costs, Sources of Finance and Disbursements 6 4 PROJECT PERFORMANCE AND RESULTS 7 4.1 Operational Performance 7 4.2 Institutional Performance 9 4.3 Performance of Consultants, Contractors and Suppliers 10 5 SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 11 5.1 Social Impact 11 5.2 Environmental Impact 12 6. SUSTAINABILITY 12 6.1 Infrastructure 12 6.2 Equipment Maintenance 12 6.3 Cost Recovery 12 6.4 Health Staff 12 7. BANK’S AND BORROWER’S PERFORMANCE 13 7.1 Bank’s Performance 13 7.2 Borrower’s Performance 13 8. OVERALL PERFORMANCE AND RATING 13 9. CONCLUSIONS, LESSONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 9.1 Conclusions 13 9.2 Lessons 14 9.3 Recommendations 14 Mrs. B. BA (Public Health Expert) and a Consulting Architect prepared this report following their project completion mission in the Republic of Cote d’Ivoire on March-April 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Côte D'ivoire
    Niger 8° 7° 6° 5° 4° 3° CÔTE D’IVOIRE The boundaries and names shown and CÔTE the designations used on this map do Sikasso BURKINA National capital D’IVOIRE not imply official endorsement or Regional capital acceptance by the United Nations Bobo-Dioulasso e FASO r Town i 11° Diebougou o 11° Orodara Major airport N B a t a International boundary l MALI g o o L e V e Regional boundary r Banfora a b Main road a Tingrela Railroad Gaoua Goueya San Sokoro kar ani Katoro Kaoura 10° Maniniam Zinguinasso Ouangolodougou 10° Korohara Samatiguila Banda B ma l SAVANES B Bobanie a DENGUELE l c a Moromoro k n Madinani c V Gbeleba o Odienne l Boundiali Ferkessedougou t a I T Seguelo Korhogo r i i e n n g b a Fasselemon o Bouna u GUINEA Bako Paatogo Kiemou Tafire 9° 9° B Gawi Siraodi ou Kineta Fadyadougou Lato M Kakpin a Bandoli Koro r Sonozo a a Kafine oa/Bo Kani h VALLEE DU B o ZANZAN u e Dabakala Boudouyo Santa Touba WORODOUGOU BANDAMA Tanbi BAFING Nandala Mankono Katiola Diaradougou Bondoukau 8° Foungesso 8° C Seguela a v Tanda a Glanle Biankouma Toumbo l l y Beoumi Bouake DIX-HUIT MONTAGNES Zuenoula Sakassou M'Bahiacro Koun Man Vavoua Ba Sunyani Danane N’ZI COMOE HAUT Agnibilekrou Bangolo Daoukro 7° SASSANDRA Bouafle LACS MOYEN 7° COMOE Binhouye Daloa MARAHOUE Yamoussoukro Duekoue Abengourou Dimbokro Sinfra Guiglo Bougouanou Toulepleu Issia Toumodi GHANA Oume MOYENCAVALLY Bebou FROMAGER a i o Zagne Gribouo Gagnoa AGNEBY B n a Tchien Adzope T 6° 6° Agboville Tai Lakota Divo Tiassale Soubre SUD Gueyo SUD BANDAMA COMOE B LIBERIA o u LAGUNES b Aboisso Niebe o Abidjan Grand-Lahou Fish Town BAS SASSANDRA Attoutou Grand-Bassam Braffedon 5° Gazeko 5° Grabo N o n Sassandra o GULF O F GUINEA Barclayville Olodio San-Pedro 0 30 60 90 km Grand Béréby Harper 0 30 60 mi Tabou ATLANTIC OCE A N 8° 7° 6° 5° 4° 3° Map No.
    [Show full text]
  • Côte D'ivoire
    Côte d’Ivoire Risk-sensitive Budget Review UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction UNDRR Country Reports on Public Investment Planning for Disaster Risk Reduction This series is designed to make available to a wider readership selected studies on public investment planning for disaster risk reduction (DRR) in cooperation with Member States. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) Country Reports do not represent the official views of UNDRR or of its member countries. The opinions expressed and arguments employed are those of the author(s). Country Reports describe preliminary results or research in progress by the author(s) and are published to stimulate discussion on a broad range of issues on DRR. Funded by the European Union Front cover photo credit: Anouk Delafortrie, EC/ECHO. ECHO’s aid supports the improvement of food security and social cohesion in areas affected by the conflict. Page i Table of contents List of figures ....................................................................................................................................ii List of tables .....................................................................................................................................iii List of acronyms ...............................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgements ...........................................................................................................................v Executive summary .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ex-Rebel Commanders and Postwar Statebuilding: Subnational Evidence from Cˆoted’Ivoire
    Ex-Rebel Commanders and Postwar Statebuilding: Subnational Evidence from C^oted'Ivoire Philip Andrew Martin* Abstract Ex-rebel commanders play a central role in peacebuilding after civil war, often deciding where governments consolidate authority and whether states relapse into vio- lence. Yet the influence and mobilization power of these actors is not uniform: in some areas commanders retain strong social ties to civilian populations after integrating into the state, while in other areas such ties wither away. What accounts for this variation? This article advances a theory of local goods provision and political accountability to explain why commander-community linkages endure or decline after post-conflict tran- sitions. Drawing on multiple data sources from C^oted'Ivoire | including an original survey of community informants in former rebel-occupied regions | it shows that com- manders retained social capital and access to networks of supporters in areas where insurgents provided essential goods to civilians during war. Where insurgents' wartime rule involved coercion and abuse, by contrast, ex-rebel commanders were more likely to lose influence and mobilization power. These findings challenge existing theories of rebel institution-building and state formation, suggesting that effective governance can help armed movements build popular support and win civil wars, but simultaneously create regionally-embedded strongmen who are able to facilitate but also resist the centralizing efforts of state rulers. *PhD Candidate, Department of Political Science, MIT. Predoctoral Research Fel- low, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Email: [email protected]. The Puzzle: Commander-Community Ties After Civil War The towns of Sangouin´eand Mahapleu in western C^oted'Ivoire were both occupied by the Forces Nouvelles (FN) rebel movement during the Ivorian civil war (2002-2011).
    [Show full text]
  • JPC7.3-Eng.Pdf (‎7.246Mb)
    Onchocerciasis Control Programme ln West Africa Programme de Lutte contre l'Onchoc€rcose en Afrique de l'Ouest' CONJOINT DU PROGRAMIVITi JOINT PROGRAMME CO]ilMMTEE COMITE .CCP Bureau du Pr€sident Offico of the Chairman JPC JOIN'T PROGRAMME COMMITTEE JPC7.3 Seventh sesslon (ocP /86.7) Accra, 9-12 December 1986 ORIGINAL : FRENCH ocrober 1986 a Provisional a item 1 ( t REPOBT ON THE EVALUATION OF THE SOCIOECONOMIC ]MPACT OF THE ONCHOCERCIASIS CONTROL PROGRAMME INTRODUCTION 1. The control of a public health disease is rightly considered by medical authorities as a health priority, especially when it j.s severely disabling for a considerable part of the population. The health priority becomes a national imperative when such a disease prevents the socioeconomic development of many areas 1n the country. When it extends beyond the borders of one country and the solution to the problem of public health lies in activities involving several countries, it ls necessary to arrive at a regional control. The inter-country cooperatlon can then appeal for in*.ernational aid proportional to the scope of the activity to be carried out. 2. Qnchocerciasis control corresponds to the above outline. This concerns bringing under control a severely disabling disease, river blindness, that is widespread in some of the African regions. This control will prompt the populations to reclaim lands that had been abandoned in the past and this will make it possible to improve the socj-oeconomic development of several countries. 3. It was with this end in vj.ew that four international agencies of the United Nations systems (UNDP, FAO, the Wor1d Bank, WHO), supported by a group of donors, decided in 7974 to assist seven West African countries (Benin, Burkj-na Faso, C6te d'Ivoire, Ghana, Ma1i, Niger and Togo) affected by onchocerclaisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Prospectus
    Supplementary Prospectus Mako Gold Limited ACN 606 241 829 Important Information This is a supplementary prospectus dated 23 March 2018 and was lodged with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) pursuant to Section 719 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) on 23 March 2018 (Supplementary Prospectus). This Supplementary Prospectus supplements the prospectus dated 19 January 2018 (Prospectus) issued by Mako Gold Limited (Company) and is issued in substitution for the supplementary prospectus dated 9 March 2018 and lodged with ASIC on that date. The ASIC, ASX Limited (ASX), and their officers take no responsibility as to the contents of this Supplementary Prospectus. This Supplementary Prospectus shall be read in its entirety together with the contents of the Prospectus. If you are in any doubt as to the contents of this document, you should consult your professional advisers without delay. Other than as set out below, all details in relation to the Prospectus remain unchanged. Terms used in this Supplementary Prospectus shall have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Prospectus. 1. Background This Supplementary Prospectus has been prepared to update the Closing Date of the Offer to no later than 5pm Friday 6 April 2018 (AEST) and to provide updated disclosure to investors regarding new developments. The Company makes amendments to the Prospectus as set out in sections 2 and 5 below. 2. Update to Closing Date The Closing Date of the Offer has been extended to no later than 5.00pm on Friday 6 April 2018 (AEST), and accordingly
    [Show full text]
  • CÔTE D'ivoire GHANA Bania Bolé 9 B Tafiré ° Anda M B HQ Sector East Kokpingue GHANA 9° Morondo a O GUINEA U
    6° 5° 4° UNOCI Sikasso B Bobo Dioulasso CÔTE ag o D'IVOIRE 11° Deployment as of é Orodara lé Kadiana Septemberu 2005 o MALI Mandiana a B Manankoro BURKINA FASO Tingréla é o Gaoua m i o S n K ank ba Niélé ara dia ni an Wa ah NIGER 10° M Wangolodougou Kouto 10° Samatigila NIGER (-) Batié é UNMO o g UNMO a GHANA (-) B UNMO Ferkessédougou UNMO Odienné Boundiali Korhogo Sirana Bouna Sawla Soukourala CÔTE D'IVOIRE GHANA Bania Bolé 9 B Tafiré ° anda m B HQ Sector East Kokpingue GHANA 9° Morondo a o GUINEA u R Niakaramandougou o u BANGLADESHMOROCCO (-) g Beyla e GHANA BANGLADESH (-) PAKISTAN MOROCCO (-) Kani Dabakala Nassian GHANA (-) UNMO GHANA Touba BANGLADESH (-) UNMO GHANA UNMO BANGLADESH BANGLADESH (-) Séguéla Katiola MOROCCO Bondoukou 8 BENIN ° BANGLADESH Sandegue 8° UNMO MOROCCO Sampa MOROCCO (-) Famienkro BENIN BANGLADESH Bouaké BENIN Prikro BANGLADESH Beoumi Sucrivoire Adi- Yaprikro Berekum Man BENIN UNMO Zuénoula Djebonoua Kouassi Koun-Fao Gohitafla Mbahiakro UNMO BANGLADESH Kouassikro BENIN (-) BAGLADESH MOROCCO Danané Logouale Kanzara Agnibilékrou BANGLADESH Bonoufla BANGLADESH Daoukro UNMO Bouaflé N BANGLADESH o 7 z 7 ° b Tiebissou i ° o Daloa Bangolo BANGLADESHL Yamoussoukro FRANCE UNMO Goaso BANGLADESH HQ UNOCI HQ Sector West Zoukougbeu PAKISTAN Bloléquin Duékoué Zambakro Abengourou GHANA Issia BANGLADESH (-) TOGO a Toulépleu Guiglo UNMO i BANGLADESH HQ B BANGLADESH BANGLADESH BANGLADESH UNMO BANGLADESH UNMO Nz BANGLADESH C o BANGLADESH o Zwedru a n v GHANA a a Gagnoa T ll BANGLADESH 6° y BANGLADESH 6° Taï Divo Agboville JORDAN
    [Show full text]
  • CÔTE D'ivoire GHANA Tafiré Bania Bolé 9 B ° Anda Kokpingue M B HQ Sector East GHANA 9° Morondo a O GUINEA U
    6° 5° 4° UNOCI Sikasso B Bobo Dioulasso CÔTE ag o D'IVOIRE 11° Deployment é Orodara lé Kadiana as of Mayu 2005 o MALI Mandiana a B Manankoro BURKINA FASO Tingréla é o Gaoua m i o S n K ank ba Niélé ara dia ni an Wa ah NIGER 10° M Wangolodougou Kouto 10° Samatigila NIGER (-) Batié é UNMO o g UNMO a GHANA (-) B UNMO Ferkessédougou UNMO Odienné Boundiali Korhogo Sirana Bouna Sawla Soukourala CÔTE D'IVOIRE GHANA Tafiré Bania Bolé 9 B ° anda Kokpingue m B HQ Sector East GHANA 9° Morondo a o GUINEA u R Niakaramandougou o u MOROCCO (-) g Beyla e GHANA BANGLADESH (-) PAKISTAN MOROCCO (-) Kani Dabakala Nassian GHANA (-) UNMO GHANA Touba BANGLADESH (-) UNMO GHANA UNMO BANGLADESH BANGLADESH (-) Séguéla Katiola MOROCCO Bondoukou 8 BENIN ° BANGLADESH Sandegue 8° UNMO BAGLADESH MOROCCO Famienkro Sampa MOROCCO (-) BENIN BANGLADESH Bouaké BENIN Prikro BANGLADESH Sucrivoire Fari M'Babo Adi- Yaprikro Berekum Man BENIN UNMO Zuénoula Djebonoua Kouassi Koun-Fao Gohitafla Mbahiakro UNMO BANGLADESH BANGLADESH MOROCCO Kouassikro BENIN (-) Danané Logouale Kanzra Agnibilékrou BANGLADESH Daoukro Yacouba- Bonoufla Bouaflé FRANCE UNMO BANGLADESH o 7 N 7 ° Carrefour b Tiebissou z ° o Daloa i L Yamoussoukro y Bangolo BANGLADESH PAKISTAN b UNMO Goaso e BANGLADESH n HQ Sector West g Zoukougbeu A Bloléquin Duékoué Zambakro UNMO Abengourou GHANA Issia BANGLADESH (-) HQ UNOCI a Toulépleu Guiglo i BANGLADESH B BANGLADESH TOGO Akoupé BANGLADESH UNMO UNMO Nz HQ C o BANGLADESH BANGLADESH o Zwedru a n v BANGLADESH a a Gagnoa T ll BANGLADESH 6° y BANGLADESH 6° Taï Divo Agboville
    [Show full text]
  • Côte D'ivoire Country Operational Plan (COP) 2017
    Côte d’Ivoire Country Operational Plan (COP) 2017 Strategic Direction Summary March 2017 1 | Page Table of Contents 1.0 Goal Statement 2.0 Epidemic, Response, and Program Context 2.1 Summary statistics, disease burden and epidemic profile 2.2 Investment profile 2.3 National Sustainability Profile 2.4 Stakeholder engagement 3.0 Geographic and Population Prioritization 4.0 Program Activities for Epidemic Control in Scale-up Locations and Populations 4.1 Targets for scale-up locations and populations 4.2 Priority and key population prevention 4.3 Preventing mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) 4.4 HIV testing services (HTS) 4.5 Facility and community-based care and support 4.6 Tuberculosis and HIV co-infection (TB/HIV) 4.7 Adult treatment 4.8 Pediatric treatment 4.9 Orphans and vulnerable children (OVC) 4.10 Laboratory 4.11 Commodities 4.12 Collaboration, Integration, and Monitoring 5.0 Program Activities for Epidemic Control in Sustained Locations and Populations 5.1 Targets for Sustained locations and populations 5.2 Package of services in sustained support locations and populations 6.0 Program Support Necessary to Achieve Sustained Epidemic Control 6.1 Critical systems investments for achieving key programmatic gaps 6.2 Critical systems investments for achieving priority policies 6.3 Proposed system investments outside of programmatic gaps and priority policies 7.0 USG Management, Operations, and Staffing Plan to Achieve Stated Goals Appendix A – Prioritization Appendix B - Budget Profile and Resource Projections Appendix C - Tables and Systems Investments for Section 6.0 2 | Page 1.0 Goal Statement The President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) program in Côte d’Ivoire will contribute to achieving the UNAIDS 90:90:90 goals embraced by the Ivorian government and multilateral stakeholders, by increasing access to quality combination prevention services, improving antiretroviral therapy (ART) coverage, and scaling up Viral Load (VL) testing services.
    [Show full text]
  • National Contingency Plan
    Republic of Côte d’Ivoire NATIONAL CONTINGENCY PLAN AFRICAN RISK CAPACITY December 2018 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS 2 GENERAL INFORMATION .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 DESCRIBE THE STATUS OF THE COUNTRY IN TERMS OF RISKS ........................................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THE PURPOSE OF THIS OPERATIONS PLAN ........................................................................................................................................ 7 3 COUNTRY DROUGHT PROFILE .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 3.1 DESCRIBE THE GENERAL GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF DROUGHTS ....................................................................................................................... 8 3.2 DESCRIBE THE GENERAL RAINFALL FEATURES OF THE COUNTRY ................................................................................................................................. 13 3.3 INSERT THE SEASONAL AGRICULTURE CALENDAR ........................................................................................................................................................ 14 3.4 HISTORICAL
    [Show full text]
  • Etude Ethnobotanique De Plantes Antifongiques Utilisées Traditionnellement En Côte D'ivoire Et Du Potentiel De Piliostigma T
    Available online at http://www.ifgdg.org Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 14(1): 239-253, January 2020 ISSN 1997-342X (Online), ISSN 1991-8631 (Print) Original Paper http://ajol.info/index.php/ijbcs http://indexmedicus.afro.who.int Etude ethnobotanique de plantes antifongiques utilisées traditionnellement en Côte d’Ivoire et du potentiel de Piliostigma Thonningii (schumach.) milne- redh. (Fabaceae) dans le contrôle de souches telluriques Etienne Katinan OUATTARA1*, Kiyinlma COULIBALY2, Théodore Dibié ETIEN1 et Noël Guédé ZIRIHI1 1Université Félix HOUPHOUET BOIGNY, UFR Biosciences, Laboratoire de Botanique, 22 BP 582 Abidjan 22, Côte d’Ivoire. 2 Université Péléforo Gon Coulibaly, UFR Sciences Biologiques, Département de Biologie Végétale, BP 1328 Korhogo, Côte d'Ivoire. *Auteur correspondant, E-mail: [email protected] RESUME A la recherche de moyen de lutte contre les agents pathogènes, une enquête ethnobotanique a été menée dans des villages Tagbana (Département de Katiola, Côte d’Ivoire). 102 tradithérapeutes dont 67 femmes et 35 hommes, utilisent 29 espèces de plantes pour leur effet antifongique. La famille des Euphorbiaceae avec 5 espèces, soit 17,85% est la plus représentée. Piliostigma thonningii avec une fréquence de citation de 24,24%, apparait comme l’espèce la plus sollicitée. Le criblage phytochimique réalisé sur les extraits aqueux et éthanolique 70% des feuilles de Piliostigma thonningii a mis en évidence la présence des tanins, des flavonoïdes, des saponines, des stérols, des alcaloïdes et des terpènes. Le potentiel antifongique des extraits aqueux et éthanolique 70% a été évaluée par la méthode de la double dilution en milieu Potato, Dextrose, Agar. Les résultats ont montré que seul l’extrait hydroéthanolique 70% des feuilles de Piliostigma thonningii possèdent des propriétés antifongiques à la fois sur Colletotrichum musae (concentration minimale inhibitrice est 12,5 mg/ml et concentration minimale fongicide est 50 mg/ml) et Sclerotium rolfsii (concentration minimale inhibitrice est 12,5 mg/ml et concentration minimale fongicide est 50 mg/ml).
    [Show full text]