DOCSLIB.ORG

Russia Beyond the Russians Dr. Asya M. Pereltsvaig (Asya [email protected])

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russia Beyond the Russians Dr. Asya M. Pereltsvaig (Asya Pereltsvaig@Yahoo.Com) Russia Beyond the Russians Dr. Asya M. Pereltsvaig ([email protected]) This course will focus on recent events in Russia and the post-Soviet space, many aspects of which are a result of enduring ethnic tensions: Russian Federation alone is home to 180 nationalities, many of which have long been at odds with each other. We shall see that many groups have been significantly diminished by the uniformity-seeking policies of the Russian state, first under the Tsars, then under the Soviets, and most recently under President Vladimir Putin. Many groups still carry the collective memories of the atrocities that were committed against them in the past and most such groups seek to gain recognition, autonomy, or even full independence. This quest ranges from the peaceful Circassian movement to the much more violent Chechen resistance. To shed light on the current events, we will review the history of Russia and its various ethno-linguistic groups and examine elements of contemporary Russian culture such as music, cinema, cuisine, ethnic jokes, and more. The course will consist of lecture and discussion. Outline: 1. Russia as a multi-ethnic country. What is ethnicity for Russians? Russians and non- Russians. Language-less ethnicities: Yezidis, Kazaks, Pomors. How did Russia become multiethnic? Brief historical overview. The birth of Russia and the Finnic peoples: assimilation of “middle Finns”, Veps culture and their influences, Middle Volga Finnic peoples, Udmurt pop sensation “Buranovo Grannies”, the Russian-Finnish borderlands. 2. Russia and its East Slavic and Finnic neighbors. Ukraine: ethnicity, language, and geopolitics. Language Laws and language politics. Language, religion, and ethnicity. Surzhyk. The Rusyns and their language. Belarusians and their language. Crimea: a hotspot today. The latest annexation of Crimea. History of Crimea. Crimean Karaim. Crimean Tatars and their deportation. Soviet-era ethnic deportations: Baltic peoples, Ukrainians, Finns and Karelians, Koreans, Volga Germans. Korean-Russian dissident songwriters Yuliy Kim and Viktor Tsoi. The GULAG system: Political prisoners in Tsarist Russia, Soviet political prisoners, Magadan. 3. Russia as “the prisoner of the Caucasus”: the Caucasus as a multiethnic hotspot in a historical perspective. Peoples, genes, languages of the North Caucasus. Northwest Caucasus: Circassians and the Sochi Olympics. The last of the Ubykh. Northcentral Caucasus: Ossetians and their language. Northeast Caucasus: Chechnya, Ingushetia, Dagestan and their peoples. The bloody history of Chechnya. Russia and the Caucasus. 4. Siberia and its peoples: reindeer herders and whalers. The impact of the oil economy. Indigenous peoples of Siberia and the Far East: traditionalism and assimilation, their languages, and interaction with the Russians. The Ugric and Samoyedic peoples: Khanty and Mansi, Enets and Nenets. The Altaic peoples: Mongolic peoples and Buddhism in Russia, Turkic peoples in Russia (Yakut, Tatar), Tungusic peoples. The Paleo-Siberian groups: Chukchi, Koryaks, Itelmen — and Russian ethnic jokes. Other peoples of Siberia: Yukaghir, Ket, and more. Problems experienced by indigenous peoples of the Far North. 5. Russian Jews: Why are Russian Jews not Russian? Khazars and Judaism. Ashkenazi Jews and Yiddish. Are there Sephardic Jews in Russia? The partitions of Poland and the Pale of Settlement. Birobidzhan: the new Jewish Republic? Birobidzhan today. Anti-Semitism in Russia. Whence Russia? The future of the multiethnic empire. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eastern Finno-Ugrian Cooperation and Foreign Relations
    UC Irvine UC Irvine Previously Published Works Title Eastern Finno-Ugrian cooperation and foreign relations Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4gc7x938 Journal Nationalities Papers, 29(1) ISSN 0090-5992 Author Taagepera, R Publication Date 2001-04-24 DOI 10.1080/00905990120036457 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Nationalities Papers, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2001 EASTERN FINNO-UGRIAN COOPERATION AND FOREIGN RELATIONS Rein Taagepera Britons and Iranians do not wax poetic when they discover that “one, two, three” sound vaguely similar in English and Persian. Finns and Hungarians at times do. When I speak of “Finno-Ugrian cooperation,” I am referring to a linguistic label that joins peoples whose languages are so distantly related that in most world contexts it would evoke no feelings of kinship.1 Similarities in folk culture may largely boil down to worldwide commonalities in peasant cultures at comparable technological stages. The racial features of Estonians and Mari may be quite disparate. Limited mutual intelligibility occurs only within the Finnic group in the narrow sense (Finns, Karelians, Vepsians, Estonians), the Permic group (Udmurts and Komi), and the Mordvin group (Moksha and Erzia). Yet, despite this almost abstract foundation, the existence of a feeling of kinship is very real. Myths may have no basis in fact, but belief in myths does occur. Before denigrating the beliefs of indigenous and recently modernized peoples as nineteenth-century relics, the observer might ask whether the maintenance of these beliefs might serve some functional twenty-first-century purpose. The underlying rationale for the Finno-Ugrian kinship beliefs has been a shared feeling of isolation among Indo-European and Turkic populations.
    [Show full text]
  • My Birthplace
    My birthplace Ягодарова Ангелина Николаевна My birthplace My birthplace Mari El The flag • We live in Mari El. Mari people belong to Finno- Ugric group which includes Hungarian, Estonians, Finns, Hanty, Mansi, Mordva, Komis (Zyrians) ,Karelians ,Komi-Permians ,Maris (Cheremises), Mordvinians (Erzas and Mokshas), Udmurts (Votiaks) ,Vepsians ,Mansis (Voguls) ,Saamis (Lapps), Khanti. Mari people speak a language of the Finno-Ugric family and live mainly in Mari El, Russia, in the middle Volga River valley. • http://aboutmari.com/wiki/Этнографические_группы • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9NpQZZGuPI&feature=r elated • The rich history of Mari land has united people of different nationalities and religions. At this moment more than 50 ethnicities are represented in Mari El republic, including, except the most numerous Russians and Мari,Tatarians,Chuvashes, Udmurts, Mordva Ukranians and many others. Compare numbers • Finnish : Mari • 1-yksi ikte • 2-kaksi koktit • 3- kolme kumit • 4 -neljä nilit • 5 -viisi vizit • 6 -kuusi kudit • 7-seitsemän shimit • 8- kahdeksan kandashe • the Mari language and culture are taught. Lake Sea Eye The colour of the water is emerald due to the water plants • We live in Mari El. Mari people belong to Finno-Ugric group which includes Hungarian, Estonians, Finns, Hanty, Mansi, Mordva. • We have our language. We speak it, study at school, sing our tuneful songs and listen to them on the radio . Mari people are very poetic. Tourism Mari El is one of the more ecologically pure areas of the European part of Russia with numerous lakes, rivers, and forests. As a result, it is a popular destination for tourists looking to enjoy nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Report Submitted by the Russian Federation Pursuant to The
    ACFC/SR/II(2005)003 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 26 April 2005) MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION REPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Report of the Russian Federation on the progress of the second cycle of monitoring in accordance with Article 25 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities MOSCOW, 2005 2 Table of contents PREAMBLE ..............................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................4 2. The legislation of the Russian Federation for the protection of national minorities rights5 3. Major lines of implementation of the law of the Russian Federation and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities .............................................................15 3.1. National territorial subdivisions...................................................................................15 3.2 Public associations – national cultural autonomies and national public organizations17 3.3 National minorities in the system of federal government............................................18 3.4 Development of Ethnic Communities’ National
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Fig. 4
    21 1 563 (45) R1a2b Kazakhs Kazakhs Kaz1 46 24 3 564 (146) R1a2b Iraqi-Jews Iraqi-Jews ISR40 148 22 2 569 (109) R1a2b Bengali West-Bengal Beng2 110 27 2 571 (107) R1a2b Gupta Uttar-Pradesh Gupta1 108 19 5 560 (116) R1a2b Middle-caste Orissa OrMc1 117 3 574 18 (141) R1a2b Kurmi Uttar-Pradesh Kurmi1 143 29 0 585 0 573 (82) R1a2b Ishkasim Tajiks Ishk1 83 39 (274) R1a2b Cossacks Cossacks Cosk2 284 27 0 586 (88) R1a2 Ishkasim Tajiks Ishk2 89 31 (47) R1a2 Rushan-Vanch Tajiks RVnch2 48 0 584 10 (222) R1a2c Altaians Altaians Altai5 230 24546 5 0 587 (84) R1a2c Kyrgyz Kyrgyz Kyrgz2 85 3 545 2 0 544 (22) R1a2c Kyrgyz Kyrgyz Kyrgz4 22 3 (89) R1a2c Kyrgyz Kyrgyz Kyrgz3 90 39 1 588 1 580 (15) R1a2 Assyrians Assyrians Assyr1 15 30 (93) R1a2 Ashkenazi-Jews Ashkenazi-Jews ISR10 94 115 (73) R1a2d Balkars Balkars Balkar2 74 35 1 589 (148) R1a2d Mumbai-Jews Mumbai Israel42 150 2 0 590 23 547 (23) R1a2d Shugnan Tajiks Shugn1 23 4 0 583 (245) R1a2d Circassians Circassians Cirkas3 253 0 592 24 (90) R1a2d Iraqi-Jews Iraqi-Jews ISR01 91 0 591 31 1 579 (81) R1a2d Rushan-Vanch Tajiks RVnch1 82 27 (272) R1a2d Azerbaijanis Azerbaijanis Azerb24 282 44 (120) R1a2 Iranians Iranians Iran3 121 2 0 582 23 542 (74) R1a2a Altaians Altaians Altai3 75 3 (142) R1a2a Altaians Altaians Altai4 144 5 570 3 (80) R1a2a Kyrgyz Tdj Kyrgyz KyrgzTJ2 81 18550 7 0 549 (86) R1a2a Kyrgyz Tdj Kyrgyz KyrgzTJ1 87 1 (87) R1a2a Kyrgyz Tdj Kyrgyz KyrgzTJ3 88 2 581 25 2 559 (242) R1a1c Hungarians Hungarians Hun 3 250 16 0 561 (268) R1a1c Cossacks Kuban Cossacks CoskK2 276 19 6 562 (20) R1a1c Ukrainians
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging in Boreal Forest: Wild Food Plants of the Republic of Karelia, NW Russia
    foods Article Foraging in Boreal Forest: Wild Food Plants of the Republic of Karelia, NW Russia Valeria Kolosova 1,2, Olga Belichenko 1,* , Alexandra Rodionova 3 , Denis Melnikov 4 and Renata Sõukand 1,* 1 Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Via Torino 155, 30172 Venice, Italy; [email protected] 2 Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tuchkov pereulok 9, 199004 St Petersburg, Russia 3 Institute of Linguistics, Literature and History of the Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushkinskaya St. 11, 185910 Petrozavodsk, Russia; [email protected] 4 Komarov Botanical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor Popov St. 2, 197376 St Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (O.B.); [email protected] (R.S.) Received: 4 July 2020; Accepted: 27 July 2020; Published: 29 July 2020 Abstract: While the current consumption of wild food plants in the taiga of the American continent is a relatively well-researched phenomenon, the European taiga area is heavily underrepresented in the scientific literature. The region is important due to its distinctive ecological conditions with restricted seasonal availability of wild plants. During an ethnobotanical field study conducted in 2018–2019, 73 people from ten settlements in the Republic of Karelia were interviewed. In addition, we conducted historical data analysis and ethnographical source analysis. The most widely consumed wild food plants are forest berries (three Vaccinium species, and Rubus chamaemorus), sap-yielding Betula and acidic Rumex. While throughout the lifetime of the interviewees the list of used plants did not change considerably, the ways in which they are processed and stored underwent several stages in function of centrally available goods, people’s welfare, technical progress, and ideas about the harm and benefit of various products and technological processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Policy in the Russian Federation: Language Diversity and National Identity
    Language Policy in the Russian Federation: language diversity and national identity by Marc Leprêtre Abstract This paper gives an overview on the different language policies implemented in the Russian Federation, stressing the relevance of the historical background, the relations between language and nationalism, and language promotion as a tool for preventing inter-ethnic conflicts and for ensuring a peaceful and balanced linguistic diversity. The text is structured in four sections: historical overview (language policy and nation-building in the USSR); interethnic tensions in the Russian Federation in the post-Soviet context; the awakening of national groups in Russia; and strategies for a peaceful and balanced management of linguistic diversity in the Russian Federation and the Soviet successor states. 1 1. Historical overview: language policy and nation-building in the USSR The processes of language planning and language policy carried on since 1991 in the Russian Federation can't be explained without a short reference to the historical, political and social outcomes raised by the nationality and language policies implemented during decades in the former USSR. Nevertheless, insofar as the topic of this paper is what is going on nowadays regarding the management of language diversity, I will try to summarize this historical background2. The ideological bases of the Soviet nationality policies and the process of nationalization3 implemented in the republics had a rather paradoxical character as far as on the one hand the Soviet regime entitled the nationalities with a well-defined political and territorial status -even for those which had not yet reached a pre-capitalist level of development- which led to a process of nation-building where political and territorial units were created on the basis of nations that constituted themselves as historical cultural communities during the Tsarist period, contrary to what had been the usual pattern in Western Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Orthodox Missions to the East
    Religion, State & Society, Vot. 25, No. 4, 1997 Russian Orthodox Missions to the East VY ACHESLAV MAIYER Once they had seized power in Russia the Bolsheviks realised that they could retain it only if all existing state institutions were utterly destroyed. The urban masses could be controlled by force, hunger and terror. But what of the peasantry, who were the majority of the population and supported the monarchy? The multilingual population of the empire lived in patriarchal, communal societies that were bonded by Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, Jewish (in small settlements in western provinces), pagan (shamanic) and even Zoroastrian beliefs. Pitirim Sorokin, one of the most eminent sociologists of this century and as a Komi a northerner by birth, writes in his auto­ biography: With its impressive rituals, church music, colourful processions and mysterious sacraments, the Russian Orthodox Church was an integral component of the aesthetic life of the peasantry. The village church was also their theatre and concert hall. In it they played an active part in the performance of the eternal liturgical tragedy of divine Creation, in the drama of the solemn funeral of the deceased, in the joyful ceremonies of baptism and matrimony, in the sacraments of confession, communion and absolution, in festival processions such as that of the Cross at Easter. In church they enjoyed stirring music, listened to the uplifting poetry that was chanted by those at prayer and took part in other religious activities. One way or another, the church and religion played an important role in the lives of the peasants no less than that of the theatre in the lives of town-dwellers.' Having sealed victory in the Civil War of 1918-22, the Bolsheviks aimed a critical blow at the social fabric of Russia - against Orthodoxy.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalities and Conflicting Ethnicity in Post-Communist Russia
    UNITED NATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT DP 50 NATIONALITIES AND CONFLICTING ETHNICITY IN POST-COMMUNIST RUSSIA by Valery Tishkov UNRISD Discussion Papers are preliminary documents circulated in a limited number of copies to stimulate discussion and critical comment. March 1994 1 The United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) is an autonomous agency that engages in multi-disciplinary research on the social dimensions of contemporary problems affecting development. Its work is guided by the conviction that, for effective development policies to be formulated, an understanding of the social and political context is crucial. The Institute attempts to provide governments, development agencies, grassroots organizations and scholars with a better understanding of how development policies and processes of economic, social and environmental change affect different social groups. Working through an extensive network of national research centres, UNRISD aims to promote original research and strengthen research capacity in developing countries. Current research themes include: Crisis, Adjustment and Social Change; Socio-Economic and Political Consequences of the International Trade in Illicit Drugs; Environment, Sustainable Development and Social Change; Integrating Gender into Development Policy; Participation and Changes in Property Relations in Communist and Post-Communist Societies; and Political Violence and Social Movements. UNRISD research projects focused on the 1995 World Summit for Social Development
    [Show full text]
  • A Meta-Ethnography of the Russian Ethnographic Museum Kamal Kariem Connecticut College, [email protected]
    Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College Slavic Studies Honors Papers Slavic Studies Department 2016 Navigating Narratives: A Meta-Ethnography of the Russian Ethnographic Museum Kamal Kariem Connecticut College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/slavichp Part of the Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Commons Recommended Citation Kariem, Kamal, "Navigating Narratives: A Meta-Ethnography of the Russian Ethnographic Museum" (2016). Slavic Studies Honors Papers. 4. http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/slavichp/4 This Honors Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Slavic Studies Department at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Slavic Studies Honors Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. Navigating Narratives: A Meta-Ethnography of the Russian Ethnographic Museum Kamal Kariem 2016 Honor’s Thesis Slavic Studies Department Connecticut College Thesis Adviser: Petko Ivanov Second Reader: Christopher Steiner Third Reader: Eileen Kane 1 Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………4 Acknowledgments ………………………………………………………………………………...5 Note on Transliteration, Names, and Citations……………………………………………………7 Chapter 1: Introduction……………………………………………………………………………8 Research Questions and Background Knowledge………………………………………...8 Research Setting: Saint Petersburg,
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Language Laws in Russia's Finno-Ugric Republics
    OFFICIAL STAtus AS A Tool OF LANGUAGE RevivAL? A StuDY OF THE LANGUAGE LAWS in RussiA’S Finno-UGriC REPUBliCS KONSTAntin ZAMYAtin Researcher, PhD Candidate Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies University of Helsinki P.O. Box 24, FIN-00014, Finland e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT This study explores the legal and institutional position of Finno-Ugric languages according to the language laws of the national republics in post-Soviet Russia. The aim is to understand whether the republican authorities intended to use the official designation of state language as a policy device with which to ensure the revival of titular languages. The approach of the study is to test revivalist theories that estab- lish a link between official status and language revival by comparing the number of institutionalised elements of official status in the republics. For the purpose of comparison, the study focuses on education and work environment among the domains within the public sphere of language use. The results demonstrate that the framing of official status in these sectors provided only some additional oppor- tunities for the expansion of language use, while the extent of their institutionali- sation directly correlated with the level of political representation of ethnic elites. KEYWORDS: official language · language revival · language laws · Finno-Ugric peoples · Russia INTRODUCTION Change in language behaviour is an outcome of a complicated variety of sociolinguistic, political and legal processes, and the study of language policy alone cannot explain all tendencies in language practices. Yet, without doubt, the impact of state language policy is among the most important causes for change in a sociolinguistic situation, although this change will not always be one that policy-makers envisage as their goal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complex Admixture History and Recent Southern Origins of Siberian Populations
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/018770; this version posted April 30, 2015. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. The complex admixture history and recent southern origins of Siberian populations Short title: The complex admixture history of Siberians Irina Pugach1*, Rostislav Matveev2, Viktor Spitsyn3, Sergey Makarov3, Innokentiy Novgorodov4, Vladimir Osakovsky5, Mark Stoneking1, Brigitte Pakendorf6* 1 Department of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany 2 Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig, Germany 3 Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Federal State Budgetary Institution, Moscow, Russian Federation 4 Institute of Foreign Philology and Regional Studies, North-Eastern Federal University, Yakutsk, Russian Federation 5 Institute of Health, North-Eastern Federal University, Yakutsk, Russian Federation 6 Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS and Université Lyon Lumière 2, Lyon, France. *Corresponding authors: [email protected] (IP), [email protected] (BP) 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/018770; this version posted April 30, 2015. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract Although Siberia was inhabited by modern humans at an early stage, there is still debate over whether this area remained habitable during the extremely cold period of the Last Glacial Maximum or whether it was subsequently repopulated by peoples with a recent shared ancestry.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Peoples of Russia and Political History
    INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF RUSSIA AND POLITICAL HISTORY Galina Diatchkova Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia Abstract I Resume The author presents a brief history ofthe Indigenous people ofthe Russian Federation, noting the different types of government policies over past centuries. She then outlines changes underthe more democratic emphasis of the current Russian Federation. New initiatives indicate the possible restoration oflanguages and education systems. There is also the potential for new, culturally appropriate, adminstrative systems. L'auteure presents un resume de I'histoire des peuples autochtones de la Federation russe en mettant en evidence les politiques gouvemementales adoptees au cours des siecles. Elle presente ensuite un aperyu des changements suscites par Ie democratisation de la Federation russe ac­ tuelle. De nouvelles initiatives indiquent la restauration possible d'un systeme d'education axe sur les autochtones et de I'utilisation des langues autochtones. Elles indiquent aussi I'etablissement potentiel de nouveaux systemes administratifs adaptes aux differences culturelles. The Canadian Journal ofNative Stucles XXI, 2(2001 ):217-233. 218 Galina Diatchkova According to a list included with Government Decree 255 dated March 24, 2000 "On the Unified Enumeration of Small In~igenous Nations of the Russian Federation", 40 nations are classified as small Indigenous nations of the North, Siberia and the Far East of Russia. 1 Their population is estimated at approximately 180,000 people residing in 28 regions of the Russian Federation. The regions of the Far North and similar areas make up about 64% ofthe territory ofthe country. The total population ofthe North accounts for approximately 8% of the entire population of the Russian Federation.
    [Show full text]