DOCSLIB.ORG

2014 Automated Vehicles Symposium Proceedings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2014 Automated Vehicles Symposium Proceedings 2014 Automated Vehicles Symposium Proceedings 2014 Automated Vehicle Symposium – Synopsis of Proceedings DISCLAIMER The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the speakers and contributors to the Automated Vehicle Symposium and not necessarily those of the United States Department of Transportation. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. If trade names manufacturers’ names or specific products are mentioned, it is because they are considered essential to the object of the publication and should not be construed as an endorsement. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. 2014 Automated Vehicles Symposium Proceedings—Final December 2014 Publication Number: FHWA-JPO-14-176 Prepared by: Volpe National Transportation Systems Center Cambridge, MA 02142 Prepared for: Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 2 Acknowledgments The 2014 Automated Vehicles Symposium (AVS 2014) was produced through a partnership between the Association of Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) and Transportation Research Board (TRB), and is indebted to its many volunteer contributors and speakers who developed the symposium content, produced sessions, and contributed to the development of these proceedings. AVS 2014 also benefitted from the direct financial contributions of its commercial benefactors, and the institutional support of the many companies and agencies that supported the time, travel, and participation for their staff. The organizing committee gratefully acknowledges the United States Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office (ITS JPO) for the level of its support to AVS 2014 and for these proceedings. Symposium Executive Committee David Agnew, Continental Automotive| Member, AUVSI Board of Directors Richard Bishop | AUVSI subject matter expert on automation Richard Cunard | Senior Program Officer, Traffic and Operations Engineer, TRB Bob Denaro, Independent Consultant | Chair, TRB Joint Subcommittee on the Challenges and Opportunities for Road Vehicle Automation Jane Lappin, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center | Chair, TRB Intelligent Transportation Systems Committee (AHB15) James Misener, Qualcomm | Symposium Demonstrations Coordinator Steven Shladover, University of California PATH Program | Chair, TRB Vehicle-Highway Automation Committee (AHB30) Michael Toscano | President and CEO, AUVSI Lindsay Voss | Senior Program Development Manager, AUVSI Benefactors iii 2014 Automated Vehicle Symposium – Synopsis of Proceedings Breakout Session Organizers and Symposium Volunteers Osman Altan, Federal Highway Administration Scott Le Vine, Imperial College London Carl Andersen, Federal Highway Administration Rachel Liu, New Jersey Institute of Technology James Anderson, RAND Elizabeth Machek, U.S. DOT/Volpe Center Bart van Arem, Delft University of Technology Michael Manser, Texas A&M Transportation Chris Armstrong, Leidos Institute Thomas Bamonte, North Texas Toll Authority Yeganeh Mashayekh, University of Pennsylvania Robert Bertini, Portland State University George Munteau, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Chandra R. Bhat, University of Texas at Austin Suzanne Murtha, Atkins Paul Carlson, Texas A&M University Siva Narla, Institute of Transportation Engineers Ching-Yao Chan, University of California Berkeley PATH Markos Papageorgiou, Technical University of Crete Nick Cohn, TomTom Ellen Partridge, U.S. DOT John Collins, Transportation Business Law and Scott Paxton, Bowman and Brooke Strategy Ram Pendalya, Arizona State University Janet Creaser, University of Minnesota Joseph Peters, Federal Highway Administration Tinu Diver, U.S. DOT/Volpe Center Mohammad Poorsartep, Texas A&M Transportation Kevin Dopart, U.S. DOT/ITS JPO Institute Frank Douma, University of Minnesota Lydia Rainville U.S. DOT/Volpe Center John Estrada, Dering & Estrada Brian Routhier, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Dan Fagnant, University of Utah Shelley Row, Shelley Row Associates, LLC Robert Ferlis, Federal Highway Administration Shannon Sanders McDonald, Southern Illinois Greg Fitch, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute University Carbondale Maxime Flament, ERTICO Chris Schwarz, University of Iowa Erin Flanigan, Cambridge Systematics Robert Seidl, Motus Ventures Edward Fok, Federal Highway Administration Nazy Sobhi, U.S. DOT/Volpe Center Deborah Freund, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Karlyn Stanley, RAND Administration Francine Steelman, Miami-Dade Expressway Kevin Gay, U.S. DOT/Volpe Center Authority Ryan Gerdes, Utah State University Thomas Stephens, Argonne National Laboratory Anna Giragosian, Leidos John Suh, Hyundai Ventures Ginger Goodin, Texas A&M Transportation Institute Sudharson Sundararajan, Booz Allen Hamilton Tom Healy, National Highway Traffic Safety Joan Walker, University of California Berkeley Administration Eric Williams, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Kevin Heaslip, Utah State University Steve Wood, National Highway Traffic Safety Charlie Howard, Puget Sound Regional Council Administration Reuben Juster, University of Maryland Stanley E. Young, University of Maryland Keith Kahl, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Wei-Bin Zhang, University of California Berkeley Ram Kandarpa, Booz Allen Hamilton PATH Valarie Kniss, U.S. DOT/Volpe Center Ismail Zohdy, Booz Allen Hamilton Walt Kulyk, Federal Transit Administration Alain Kornhauser, Princeton University iv Contents Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................................. iii 1 Overview of Symposium .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Symposium Attendees ............................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Workshop Agenda ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Demonstrations ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2 Overview of Plenary Sessions: Day 1 .................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Opening Keynote ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Briefing: Vehicle Manufacturers and Suppliers ......................................................................................... 6 2.3 Panel Session: Digital Infrastructure .......................................................................................................... 8 2.4 Panel Session: Technology Challenges ....................................................................................................... 9 2.5 Automated Vehicles Symposium Attendee Survey Results ..................................................................... 12 3 Overview of Plenary Sessions: Day 2 ................................................................................................................ 15 3.1 Keynote Address ...................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Briefing: Vehicle Manufacturers and Suppliers ....................................................................................... 15 3.3 Updates on Automation Projects in Europe ............................................................................................ 17 3.4 Panel Session: Societal Issues and Non-Technical Challenges ................................................................. 19 4 Overview of Plenary Sessions: Day 3 ................................................................................................................ 21 5 Overview of Breakout Sessions ........................................................................................................................ 25 5.1 Evolutionary Pathways to Automated Transit and Shared Mobility ....................................................... 26 5.2 Regional Planning and Modeling Implications of Driverless Cars ............................................................ 28 5.3 Roadway Management and Operations with Automated Vehicles ........................................................ 29 5.4 Truck Automation Opportunities ............................................................................................................. 30 5.5 Legal Accelerators and Brakes ................................................................................................................. 31 5.6 The State and Future Direction of Automated-Vehicle Human Factors .................................................. 33 5.7 Near-Term Connected/Automated Technology Deployment Opportunities .......................................... 34 5.8 Personal Vehicle Automation Commercialization ................................................................................... 37 5.9 Technology Roadmap, Maturity and Performance: Operational Requirements for Vehicle-Road Automation Systems and Components ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Innovation in Ecosystem Business Models: an Application to Maas and Autonomous Vehicles in Urban Mobility System
    Innovation in ecosystem business models : An application to MaaS and Autonomous vehicles in urban mobility system Rodrigo Gandia To cite this version: Rodrigo Gandia. Innovation in ecosystem business models : An application to MaaS and Autonomous vehicles in urban mobility system. Economics and Finance. Université Paris-Saclay; University of Lavras, UFLA (Brésil), 2020. English. NNT : 2020UPASC018. tel-02895349 HAL Id: tel-02895349 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02895349 Submitted on 9 Jul 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Innovation in Ecosystem Business Models: An Application to MaaS and Autonomous Vehicles in Urban Mobility System Thèse de doctorat de l'université Paris-Saclay École doctorale n° 573 Interfaces : approches interdisciplinaires, fon- dements, applications et innovation (Interfaces) Spécialité de doctorat : Ingénierie des systèmes complexes Unité de recherche : Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, Laboratoire Genie Industriel, 91190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. Référent : CentraleSupélec Thèse présentée et
    [Show full text]
  • Autonomous Vehicle, Sensing and Communication Survey 1 Introduction
    Autonomous Vehicle, Sensing and Communication Survey Edited and submitted by Shraga Shoval Prepared by Shlomi Hacohen and Oded Medina Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel. August 2020 Abstract Autonomous vehicles introduce dramatic changes to the way in which we travel. This technology has the potential to impact the transportation across a wide array of categories including safety, congestion, and travel behavior. In this report we review the main issues involved in autonomous driving as discussed in the literature and shed light on topics that we believe require further development. 1 Introduction The challenges in autonomous driving require a combination of many capabilities, among them: localization, motion planning, vehicle’s systems control (steering, acceleration/deceleration, signaling, etc.), road perception, prediction of other road-users behavior, awareness of dangers, etc. These capabilities have a various level of importance for various levels of driving automation. Even though the first autonomous vehicle (AV) was experimented in 1926 [104], a real-modern autonomous vehicle was first presented in 1986 by a team from Carnegie Mellon University [58]. Since 2010, many major automotive manufacturers, such as GM, Mercedes Benz, Ford, Toyota, and many more are developing AVs [90]. A demonstration of AV equipped with numerous sensors and communication systems was presented by Toyota in 2013 [10]. In 2016, Google’s AV has passed over one million kilometers. These events present a glimpse to the landmarks in the development of AV that, due to the complexity of the task, progresses slowly with considerable amount of attention to safety and reliability. AVs need a large amount of data for reliable decision making.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Transportation in China and the United States Yuming Ge, Xiaoman Liu, Libo Tang, and Darrell M
    DECEMBER 2017 Smart transportation in China and the United States Yuming Ge, Xiaoman Liu, Libo Tang, and Darrell M. West INTRODUCTION It is no surprise that countries are suffering traffic problems as their rural and suburban populations move to cities and population density increases around urban areas. As cities grow in density, we have seen vehicular congestion, poor urban planning, and insufficient highway designs. The unfortunate downsides of these trends are the loss of lives due to accidents, time and money spent commuting, and lost productivity and economic growth for the system as a whole. All these developments are problematic because transportation accounts for six to 12 percent of Gross Domestic Product in many developed countries.1 The cost of traffic congestion alone is estimated to be greater than $200 billion in four Western countries: France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States.2 But the good news is that recent advancements in computing, network speed, and communications sensors make it possible to improve transportation infrastructure, traffic management, and vehicular operations. Through better infrastructure, ubiquitous connectivity, 5G (fifth generation) networks, Yuming Ge, Xiaoman Liu, and dynamic traffic signals, remote sensors, vehicle-sharing services, and autonomous vehicles, it is Libo Tang are researchers at the possible to increase automotive safety, efficiency, and operations. Connected vehicles are moving China Academy beyond crash notification and lane changing guidance to offer a variety of services related to main- of Information and Communication tenance, operations, and entertainment. 5G networks will enable a shift in cellular technology from Technology (CAICT). supporting fixed services to communication and data exchange that is machine-based.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Fuzzy Logic in Automated Vehicle Control
    Intelligent Transportation Systems Using Fuzzy Logic in Automated Vehicle Control José E. Naranjo, Carlos González, Ricardo García, and Teresa de Pedro, Instituto de Automática Industrial Miguel A. Sotelo, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares ntil recently, in-vehicle computing has been largely relegated to auxiliary U tasks such as regulating cabin temperature, opening doors, and monitoring Automated versions fuel, oil, and battery-charge levels. Now, however, computers are increasingly assum- of a mass-produced ing driving-related tasks in some commercial models. Among those tasks are vehicle use fuzzy logic • maintaining a reference velocity or keeping a safe nomous robots and fuzzy control systems and the distance from other vehicles, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares’s knowledge of techniques to both • improving night vision with infrared cameras, and artificial vision. (The “Intelligent-Vehicle Systems” • building maps and providing alternative routes. sidebar discusses other such projects.) We’re devel- address common oping a testbed infrastructure for vehicle driving that Still, many traffic situations remain complex and includes control-system experimentation, strategies, challenges and difficult to manage, particularly in urban settings. and sensors. All of our facilities and instruments are The driving task belongs to a class of problems that available for collaboration with other research groups incorporate human depend on underlying systems for logical reasoning in this field. So far, we’ve automated and instru- and dealing with uncertainty. So, to move vehicle mented two Citroën Berlingo mass-produced vans procedural knowledge computers beyond monitoring and into tasks related to carry out our objectives. to environment perception or driving, we must inte- into the vehicle control grate aspects of human intelligence and behaviors Automated-vehicle equipment so that vehicles can manage driving actuators in a Figure 1 shows two mass-produced electric Cit- algorithms.
    [Show full text]
  • Rome Rec Rules
    2017 UNIFIED FOOTBALL BY-LAWS FOR GAME OFFICIALS Rev. 6.15.17 ROME FLOYD UNIFIED FOOTBALL BYLAWS Section D. Governing Rules 1. GoverneD by the current rules anD regulations of the GHSA Constitution anD By-Laws anD by the National FeDeration EDition of Football rules for the current year, with excePtions as noteD in the Rome-Floyd Unified Youth Football Program. 2. The UFC reserves the right to consiDer special and unusual cases that occur from time to time and rule in whatever manner is consiDereD to be in the best interest of the overall Program. Section F. SiDeline Decorum 1. AuthorizeD siDeline Persons incluDe heaD coach, four assistant coaches anD the Players. 2. All coaches must wear a UFC issueD Coach’s Pass to stanD on the sidelines. Anyone without a Coach’s Pass will not be allowed on the sidelines. Officials and/or program staff will be permitted to remove anyone without a Coach’s Pass from the siDelines. 3. In an effort to Promote a quality Program, all coaches shoulD aDhere to the following Dress coDe: shirt, shoes (no sanDals or fliP floPs) anD Pants/shorts (no cutoffs). ADDitionally there shoulD be no logos or images that Promote alcohol, tobacco or vulgar statements. Section C. Length of Games 1. A regulation game shall consist of four (4) eight minute quarters. 2. Clock OPeration AFTER change of Possession. A. Kick-Offs • Any kick-off that is returned and the ball carrier is downed in the field of Play, the clock will start with the ReaDy-For-Play signal.
    [Show full text]
  • Connected and Autonomous Vehicles: Implications for Policy and Practice in City and Transportation Planning
    Connected and Autonomous Vehicles: Implications for Policy and Practice in City and Transportation Planning by Charles Ng supervised by Laura Taylor A Major Paper submitted to the Faculty of Environmental Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Environmental Studies York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada December 8, 2017 Acknowledgments This paper could not have been completed without the help and support of the caring individuals that I am thankful to have in my life. I would like to thank and acknowledge my mother, Maria, and my sister, Ka Lang for providing me with love and support; my advisor, Peter Timmerman, and my supervisor, Laura Taylor, for providing me with academic and non-academic support; and my invaluable friends that I have made in the MES program for their encouragement, support and relief. i Foreword My Area of Concentration for my Plan of Study is sustainable transportation planning for growth management. Connected and Autonomous Vehicles will change the urban landscape, the roles of governments and present new challenges to planners. This paper has allowed me to view transportation planning through the lens of emerging technologies and how this affects cities in the short and long term. There are many sustainability and growth management implications with Connected and Autonomous Vehicles. For example, automated vehicles can foster decentralization because it easily enables travel however, if utilized correctly, automated vehicles can also compliment local transit systems to support intensification. This is especially important in Ontario (Canada’s first province to allow testing of autonomous vehicles on public roads) as it directly relates to the goals and policies related to sprawl and sustainability as outlined in Ontario’s four provincial land use plans: The Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH), The Greenbelt Plan, The Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan and the Niagara Escarpment Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky, St. Louis Choices As Big Tourney Starts
    • 1 1% St. as fretting jsp0f * Louis Choices Starts D. C., March 12, 1949—A—9 Kentucky, Washington, Saturday, Big Tourney Wildcat Quint Hoping Detroit's Houtteman Golf Balls w in, Lose, or Draw HSlp FINISH IS FORECAST—Steve Pay Pro's Way By FRANCIS STANN To Avenge Its Lone Better, but Remains Belloise of Star Staff Correspondent the Bronx stands Out of Court Defeat Billikens over J. T. Ross of San Jose, On List By the Associated Press Two Platoons for Eddie by Calif., after knocking him Danger SUFFOLK, Va.. Mar. 12.—Leo ly tht Associated Press tht Associated ST. PETERSBURG, Fla., Mar. 12.—Eddie Dyer, a drawling, down in the second frame of By Pres* R. Mallory, a golf professional NEW YORK. Mar. 12.—Unless Texan who favor football over al- LAKELAND, Fla,. Mar. 12.— from Bridgeport. Conn., found he amiable may secretly baseball, their scheduled 10-round fea- somebody stubs a toe along the Young Art hardluck didn't have to though he manages the St. Louis Cardinals, was holding court in | Houtteman, enough money pay way, the National Invitation bas- ture boxing bout at New York's of the Detroit Tiger his $50 fine $4.25 costs he the Rcdbirds' clubhouse when the two-platoon system made famous | guy pitching plus was ket ball tournament which opens staff, to be his assessed when he was by Michigan and other famed Madison Square Garden last ; appeared winning charged with Army, grid teams, at Madison Garden Square today ; fight for life today. speeding 70 miles an hour over was brought up.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study on Innovation, Development and Implementation
    ISSN (Online) 2581-9429 IJAR SCT ISSN (Print) 2581-XXXX International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology (IJARSCT) Volume 11, Issue 1, November 2020 Impact Factor: 4.819 The Study on Innovation, Development and Implementation of the Self-driving Car Aniruddha Chaki Student, Department of Electrical Engineering Siliguri Institute of Technology, Siliguri, India Abstract: The development of the self-driving car is one of the greatest inventions of the century. With the technological advancement, the implementation of the autonomous vehicle has become the major attention among the researchers. This paper discusses the brief history of self-driving cars, its research and development, key technologies behind the self-driving, main aspects of implementing self-driving cars. The paper also describes some challenges with possible solutions to the fully autonomous vehicle in mass implementation. Keywords: Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS), autonomous, navigation, positioning, self- driving technology, radar, lidar, path planning, obstacle avoidance, Full Self driving (FSD), accidents, protests, advantages, challenges. I. INTRODUCTION In this 21st-century progress in technology has made man as omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent as a god. It is being tried to find out and accomplish any work with higher efficiency, lesser cost, and least possible effort. This makes researchers explore the domain of Automation, Machine learning, and Artificial Intelligence to handle the hardest of the jobs which were once tedious and cumbersome for humans [1]. We are driving towards the future where humans will only be involved in high mental ability skills and all the other works will be automated [2]. In this paper, the previous researches in the field of self-driving have been studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Morgan Stanley NDR
    AMBARELLA.COM AMBARELLA.COM December 6th & 9th, 2019 COPYRIGHT COPYRIGHT AMBARELLA 2019 Morgan Stanley NDR Frankfurt, Germany and Milan, Italy Dr. Alberto Broggi, GM Ambarella Italy Casey Eichler, CFO Louis Gerhardy, Corporate Development 1 Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements that are subject to many risks and uncertainties. All statements made in this presentation other than statements of historical facts are forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements regarding Ambarella’s strategy, future operations, financial targets, future revenues, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives for future operations, future product introductions, future rate of our revenue growth, the size of markets addressed by the company's solutions and the growth rate of those markets, technology trends, our ability to address market and customer demands and to timely develop new or enhanced solutions to meet those demands, our ability to achieve design wins, and our ability to retain and expand our customer and partner relationships. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as "may," "will," "should," "could," "would," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "projects," "predicts," "potential," or the negative of those terms, and similar expressions and comparable terminology intended to identify forward-looking statements. We have based forward-looking statements largely on our estimates of our financial results and our current expectations
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging Pitcher-Batter Matchups for Optimal Game Strategy
    Leveraging Pitcher-Batter Matchups for Optimal Game Strategy Paper Track: Baseball Paper ID: 13603 Willie K. Harrison∗ and John L. Salmony ∗Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Brigham Young University yDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University 1. Introduction Recent play in Major League Baseball (MLB) has showcased many attempts to achieve an advantage through smart selection of pitcher-batter matchups. One such case in the 2018 postseason had the Los Angeles Dodgers’ manager, Dave Roberts, selecting an all right-handed batting lineup to face both Chris Sale and David Price in games one and two of the World Series. Both pitchers are left-handed, and the choice certainly tailors to the well-known lefty-righty handedness matchup strategy [10]. Further- more, this choice was inline with the platoon system that the Dodgers had employed throughout the 2018 regular season [15], often starting all right-handed batting lineups against left-handed starters, seemingly with great success. Although attempts have been made to optimize pitcher-batter matchup strategies in the sabermet- rics [2, 7, 9] literature (e.g., [5, 6]), these approaches have tended to apply averages of large data sets in an attempt to ��ine tune some matchup data. For example, Hirotsu and Wright used the handedness (i.e., left handed or right handed) of both the pitcher and the batter to adjust average batting statistics in an attempt to optimize the choice of pitcher substitution [6]. In this approach, if a batter’s dominant hand is opposite to that of a pitcher’s dominant hand, then the offensive statistics of the batter are as- sumed to be enhanced slightly for that speciic matchup.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 WP Transformation of the Workplace Through Robotics, AI And
    The Transformation of the Workplace Through Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, and Automation: Employment and Labor Law Issues, Solutions, and the Legislative and Regulatory Response January 2016 AUTHORS Garry Mathiason Michael Lotito Robert Wolff Natalie Pierce Kerry Notestine Greg Brown John Cerilli Eugene Ryu Joon Hwang Phil Gordon Ilyse Schuman Miranda Mossavar Paul Kennedy Paul Weiner Sarah Ross Theodora Lee William Hays Weissman Jeff Seidle IMPORTANT NOTICE This publication is not a do-it-yourself guide to resolving employment disputes or handling employment litigation. Nonetheless, employers involved in ongoing disputes and litigation will find the information extremely useful in understanding the issues raised and their legal context. This report is not a substitute for experienced legal counsel and does not provide legal advice or attempt to address the numerous factual issues that inevitably arise in any employment-related dispute. Copyright ©2016 Littler Mendelson, P.C. All material contained within this publication is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced without the express written consent of Littler Mendelson. Table of Contents SECTION / TOPIC PAGE I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Legal Challenges Arising from Robotics, Artificial Intelligence 1 and Automation B. A Note on the Important Concepts Addressed in This Report 2 II. ROBOTICS, AUTOMATION, AND THE NEW WORKPLACE LANDSCAPE (CATEGORY ONE) 3 A. Job Dislocation and Job Creation 4 1. WARN Act 4 2. Severence 4 3. Retraining 5 B. Labor Unions and Collective Bargaining 5 1. Protected Concerted Activity 5 2. Collective Bargaining 6 C. Tax Implications 7 D. Anti-Discrimination 8 1. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) 8 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments in the Automation of Cars
    International Journal of Technical Research and Applications e-ISSN: 2320-8163, www.ijtra.com Volume 5, Issue 1 (Jan-Feb, 2017), PP. 95-100 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE AUTOMATION OF CARS- A REVIEW 1Mrudul Amritphale, 2Abhishek Mahesh, 3Ashwini Motiwale, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Acropolis Institute of Technology and Research Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India [email protected] Abstract— Vehicular automation can be defined as the use of assistance systems (ADAS) are engineered to eliminate the technology in a vehicle in such a way that it can assist the driver physical as well as the psychological after-effects of a in the best possible way by reducing his/her mental stresses. The collision by eliminating the possibilities of causing the present world is accepting the rapid changes in the technology collision. In the 21st century, various automobile companies and trying to apply it in the real world. Hence, the automobile are focusing on applying the newly advanced intelligent industry is keenly interested in improvising with the dynamic features of a vehicle by using the new technology. Modern day systems in their cars, in order to assist the drivers while cars such as Mercedes Benz S-class, BMW 7 series etc. are driving as well as to safeguard the passengers travelling in the equipped with such automated systems. Vehicles at present are cars, systems such as adaptive cruise control, advanced semi-automated: fully automated vehicles are under development automatic collision notification, intelligent parking assistant and testing and will take time to be available commercially. system, automatic parking, precrash system, traffic sign Passengers comfort and wellbeing, increased safety and increased recognition, distance control assist, dead man’s switch, anti- highway capacity are among the most important initiatives lock braking system(ABS) and many more.
    [Show full text]