The Broadband Imperative II: Equitable Access for Learning

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Broadband Imperative II: Equitable Access for Learning The Broadband Imperative II: Equitable Access for Learning September 2016 Founded in 2001, the State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA) is the principal nonprofit membership association representing US state and territorial educational technology leaders. Our mission is to build and increase the capacity of state and national leaders to improve education through technology policy and practice. For more information, please visit: setda.org. REPORT AUTHORS Christine Fox, Deputy Executive Director, SETDA Rachel Jones, Educational Consultant Suggested Citation: Fox, C., Jones, R. (2016). The Broadband Imperative II: Equitable Access for Learning. Washington, DC: State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA). Sponsors Thank you to the following companies for their generous support of this valuable work. SETDA www.setda.org September 2016 | Page i About this work: Based in part on SETDA’s 2012, Broadband Imperative and the 2016 State K-12 Broadband Leadership: Driving Connectivity and Access, SETDA completed this research in partnership with state and private sector leaders including state CIOs, state network managers, E-rate Coordinators and digital learning administrators. CREDITS & ACKNOWLEDGMENTS SETDA 2016-2017 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Candice Dodson, Indiana Department of Education (Chair) Todd Lawrence, Idaho State Department of Education (Chair-elect) Shannon Parks, Alabama Department of Education Consultant (Secretary) Julia Fallon, Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction, Washington (Treasurer) Laurence Cocco, New Jersey Department of Education Peter Drescher, Vermont Agency of Education Eric Hileman (Emeritus), Oklahoma City Public Schools Janice Mertes, Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Carla Wade, Oregon Department of Education In addition to the contributions by the SETDA Board of Directors, SETDA would like to thank both members and contributors for their helpful comments and insights, including: • Jerome Browning, E-rate Coordinator, Alabama Department of Education • Cortney T. Buffington, Executive Director, KanREN, Inc. • Kevin Carman, Director, AT&T Education Channel Marketing • Douglas Casey, Executive Director, Commission for Educational Technology, Connecticut • John Chadwick, E-Rate Coordinator, New Mexico Department of Education • Bob Collie, Senior Vice President, Education Networks of America (ENA) • DeLilah Collins, E-rate and Special Projects Coordinator, Colorado Department of Education • Jeff Egly, Associate Director, Utah Education Network • Sonya Edwards, Education Administrator, California Department of Education • Derrel Fincher, OUSF Recertification Coordinator, Oklahoma Corporation Commission • Michael Flood, Vice President, Strategy, Kajeet SETDA www.setda.org September 2016 | Page ii • Adam Geller, Founder & CEO, Edthena • Rick Gaisford, Educational Technology Specialist, Utah State Office of Education • Steve Garton, Senior Manager, Common Sense Education • Lillian Kellogg, Vice President, Education Networks of America (ENA) • Jeff Mao, Senior Director, Common Sense Education • Ann-Marie Mapes, Consultant, Michigan Department of Education • Richard Marvin, Lead Marketing Manager, AT&T • Mark Masterson, CIO, Arizona Department of Education • Amy McLaughlin, Director of IT Operations, Oregon Department of Education • Katherine Messier, Managing Director, Mobile Beacon • Gayle Nelson, Vice President, Education Networks of America (ENA) • Tim Sizemore, Program Manager, Kentucky Education Network • Melinda Stanley, Assistant Director of Membership Development, KanREN, Inc. In addition, SETDA would like to thank Phil Emer, Director Technology Planning and Policy, The Friday Institute for Educational Innovation, Marie Bjerede, Founder, e-Mergents and Keith Krueger, Chief Executive Officer, Consortia for School Networking for their support of this work. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. SETDA www.setda.org September 2016 | Page iii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................1 Shift in Learning Models .................................................................................................................5 Scenarios ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������7 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................8 1. Increase Infrastructure to Support Student-Centered Learning ......................................8 Rationale for Infrastructure Recommendations ...............................................................................8 Internet Service Provider (ISP) Recommendation ..........................................................................12 Wide Area Network (WAN) Recommendation ...............................................................................14 2. Design Infrastructure to Meet Capacity Targets ..............................................................17 Design Flexible District Networks ..................................................................................................17 Utilize Wireless Connectivity to Meet Infrastructure Needs ............................................................20 3. Ensure Equity of Access Outside of School for All Students ..........................................23 Equity Challenges Persist .............................................................................................................23 Distribute Outreach to Families About the Necessity for Out-of-School Access .............................25 Leverage Community Partnerships for Equity of Access ...............................................................27 Share Out-of-School Access Options ..........................................................................................29 4. Leverage State Resources to Increase Broadband Access ............................................31 Provide Direct State Funding for Broadband Services, Including Funding for the E-rate Match ......31 Enact State Policies to Support Deployment and Adoption �����������������������������������������������������������32 Create and/or Expand State Broadband Networks for Economies of Scale .................................33 Utilize Innovative Purchasing Options for Increased Buying Power ................................................33 Summary and Next Steps ....................................................................................................... 34 APPENDIX A: METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 35 APPENDIX B: FEDERAL PROGRAMS/INITIATIVES THAT SUPPORT SCHOOL ACCESS . 36 APPENDIX C: RESOURCES ......................................................................................................37 APPENDIX D: EXEMPLARS ......................................................................................................41 APPENDIX E: GLOSSARY .........................................................................................................47 ENDNOTES ............................................................................................................................... 48 SETDA www.setda.org September 2016 | Page iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The bar has moved. Access to high-speed broadband in K-12 education is no longer an afterthought; instead it is fundamental for implementing the student-centered learning models critical in preparing all students for college and careers in the digital age. Schools and districts are moving towards student-centered, personalized learning approaches to increase student success — utilizing digital applications to support these deeper learning experiences. High-speed broadband access enables schools to expand learning options, allowing students to create content, participate in virtual courses that may not be available on their campuses, and to collaborate with experts or other students remotely. Bandwidth capacity is required to support these digital age learning opportunities, and determines which digital instructional materials and educational applications students and educators can effectively leverage in the classroom. Recommendations In May 2012, SETDA’s groundbreaking report, The Broadband Imperative: Recommendations to Address K-12 Education Infrastructure Needs pushed educators and policy makers around the country to increase high-speed broadband access in schools—with specific recommendations regarding access, funding, and policies to support teaching and learning. In April 2016, SETDA and Common Sense Kids Action released the State K-12 Broadband Leadership: Driving Connectivity and Access report highlighting the powerful impact of state leadership in driving critical policy decisions at the national and state level to support broadband networks, bandwidth capacity and home access for low-income families. In this companion report, The Broadband Imperative II: Equitable Access for Learning SETDA continues to advocate for increasing robust access both in and out of school to best prepare all students for college and careers. SETDA provides the following updated recommendations for policy makers and school
Recommended publications
  • June 2006 Steering Committee Materials
    Utah Education Network Steering Committee June 16, 2006 U TAH EDUCATION NETWORK S TEERING COMMITTEE AGENDA JUNE 16, 2006 Committee of the Whole / Business Meeting 9:00 a.m.- 11:00 a.m. Welcome and Introductions Tab 31 FISCAL YEAR 2007 BUDGET – ACTION . 1 FY 2007 UEN BUDGET - DRAFT . 7 Tab 1 UTAH EDUCATION NETWORK FY 2007 STRATEGIC PLAN – ACTION. 9 UTAH EDUCATION NETWORK FY2007 PLAN - DRAFT . 11 Tab 2 STEERING COMMITTEE STRUCTURE, MEETING FORMAT AND . 25 PROPOSED MEETING DATES – ACTION Tab 4 POLICY 2.1: NETWORK CONNECTIVITY CHARGES – ACTION . 27 UTAH EDUCATION NETWORK 2.1 NETWORK CONNECTIVITY CHARGES . 31 UTAH EDUCATION NETWORK FEE STRUCTURE . 37 NETWORK CONNECTIVITY CHARGES DECISION TREE . 39 Tab 5 NATIONAL LAMBDARAIL (NLR) MEDIA RELEASE – DISCUSSION . 41 NATIONAL LAMBDARAIL (NLR) MEDIA RELEASE . 43 Tab 6 STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES . 45 Tab 7 OTHER . 53 11:00 a.m.- Instructional Services Subcommittee 12:00 p.m. Tab 7 END-OF-LIFE POLICY FOR WEB SERVICES – ACTION . 55 i Tab 8 INTERNET SAFETY PROJECT – ACTION . 57 Tab 9 HIGHER EDUCATION LEARNING OBJECTS MEETING REPORT – DISCUSSION . 59 Tab 10 TELESCOPE USERS GROUP MEETING – DISCUSSION . 61 Tab 11 PUBLIC EDUCATION AND HIGHER EDUCATION ADVISORY . 63 COMMITTEE REPORTS – DISCUSSION PUBLIC EDUCATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT . 65 HIGHER EDUCATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT . 69 11:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. Technical Services Subcommittee Agenda Tab 12 STATE OF UTAH REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS (SURIN) – ACTION . 73 STATE OF UTAH REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS (SURIN) . 75 Please place these materials in your Steering Committee Binder. ii UEN Steering Committee - June 2006 C OMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE T AB 31 FISCAL YEAR 2007 BUDGET – ACTION Issue The FY 2007 UEN Budget is ready for fi nal review and approval by the Steering Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) Technologies
    CHAPTER21 Chapter Goals • Identify and discuss different types of digital subscriber line (DSL) technologies. • Discuss the benefits of using xDSL technologies. • Explain how ASDL works. • Explain the basic concepts of signaling and modulation. • Discuss additional DSL technologies (SDSL, HDSL, HDSL-2, G.SHDSL, IDSL, and VDSL). Digital Subscriber Line Introduction Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) technology is a modem technology that uses existing twisted-pair telephone lines to transport high-bandwidth data, such as multimedia and video, to service subscribers. The term xDSL covers a number of similar yet competing forms of DSL technologies, including ADSL, SDSL, HDSL, HDSL-2, G.SHDL, IDSL, and VDSL. xDSL is drawing significant attention from implementers and service providers because it promises to deliver high-bandwidth data rates to dispersed locations with relatively small changes to the existing telco infrastructure. xDSL services are dedicated, point-to-point, public network access over twisted-pair copper wire on the local loop (last mile) between a network service provider’s (NSP) central office and the customer site, or on local loops created either intrabuilding or intracampus. Currently, most DSL deployments are ADSL, mainly delivered to residential customers. This chapter focus mainly on defining ADSL. Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) technology is asymmetric. It allows more bandwidth downstream—from an NSP’s central office to the customer site—than upstream from the subscriber to the central office. This asymmetry, combined with always-on access (which eliminates call setup), makes ADSL ideal for Internet/intranet surfing, video-on-demand, and remote LAN access. Users of these applications typically download much more information than they send.
    [Show full text]
  • A Technology Comparison Adopting Ultra-Wideband for Memsen’S File Sharing and Wireless Marketing Platform
    A Technology Comparison Adopting Ultra-Wideband for Memsen’s file sharing and wireless marketing platform What is Ultra-Wideband Technology? Memsen Corporation 1 of 8 • Ultra-Wideband is a proposed standard for short-range wireless communications that aims to replace Bluetooth technology in near future. • It is an ideal solution for wireless connectivity in the range of 10 to 20 meters between consumer electronics (CE), mobile devices, and PC peripheral devices which provides very high data-rate while consuming very little battery power. It offers the best solution for bandwidth, cost, power consumption, and physical size requirements for next generation consumer electronic devices. • UWB radios can use frequencies from 3.1 GHz to 10.6 GHz, a band more than 7 GHz wide. Each radio channel can have a bandwidth of more than 500 MHz depending upon its center frequency. Due to such a large signal bandwidth, FCC has put severe broadcast power restrictions. By doing so UWB devices can make use of extremely wide frequency band while emitting very less amount of energy to get detected by other narrower band devices. Hence, a UWB device signal can not interfere with other narrower band device signals and because of this reason a UWB device can co-exist with other wireless devices. • UWB is considered as Wireless USB – replacement of standard USB and fire wire (IEEE 1394) solutions due to its higher data-rate compared to USB and fire wire. • UWB signals can co-exists with other short/large range wireless communications signals due to its own nature of being detected as noise to other signals.
    [Show full text]
  • UEN Board Meeting
    UEN Board Meeting February 15, 2013 9:00 a.m. Dolores Doré Eccles Broadcast Center and IVC Utah Education Network Board Meeting Agenda February 15, 2013 9:00 a.m. Welcome and Introductions 1. Approval of the Minutes – Action .....................................................1 1. Attachment A – Utah Education Network Board Meeting Minutes ..................3 2. Executive Director’s Report – Discussion ........................................7 3. Closed Session ..................................................................................9 4. Services Dependencies – Discussion ........................................... 11 4. Attachment A – Services Dependencies Analysis ...................................... 13 5. NTIA BTOP Infrastructure Grant Update – Discussion .................. 29 5. Attachment A – UEN Proposed BTOP Fiber IRUs: Northern Utah and Salt Lake City Downtown Area ......................................................... 31 6. Utah Data Alliance – Action ............................................................ 33 6. Attachment A – Utah Data Alliance Brief for UEN Board .............................. 35 7. FY 2013 Mid-Year Progress Report – Discussion .......................... 37 7. Attachment A – UEN FY 2013 Initiatives .................................................. 39 8. Advisory Council – Action ............................................................... 43 9. Video Productions – Discussion ..................................................... 45 10. UEN Calendar – Discussion...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 8: Overview of Computer Networking Roadmap
    Lecture 8: Overview of Computer Networking Slides adapted from those of Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach, 5th edition. Jim Kurose, Keith Ross, Addison-Wesley, April 2009. Roadmap ! what’s the Internet? ! network edge: hosts, access net ! network core: packet/circuit switching, Internet structure ! performance: loss, delay, throughput ! media distribution: UDP, TCP/IP 1 What’s the Internet: “nuts and bolts” view PC ! millions of connected Mobile network computing devices: server Global ISP hosts = end systems wireless laptop " running network apps cellular handheld Home network ! communication links Regional ISP " fiber, copper, radio, satellite access " points transmission rate = bandwidth Institutional network wired links ! routers: forward packets (chunks of router data) What’s the Internet: “nuts and bolts” view ! protocols control sending, receiving Mobile network of msgs Global ISP " e.g., TCP, IP, HTTP, Skype, Ethernet ! Internet: “network of networks” Home network " loosely hierarchical Regional ISP " public Internet versus private intranet Institutional network ! Internet standards " RFC: Request for comments " IETF: Internet Engineering Task Force 2 A closer look at network structure: ! network edge: applications and hosts ! access networks, physical media: wired, wireless communication links ! network core: " interconnected routers " network of networks The network edge: ! end systems (hosts): " run application programs " e.g. Web, email " at “edge of network” peer-peer ! client/server model " client host requests, receives
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 17 University of Utah Part 1 Educational Telecommunications
    Utah Code Chapter 17 University of Utah Part 1 Educational Telecommunications 53B-17-101 Legislative findings on public broadcasting and telecommunications for education. The Legislature finds and determines the following: (1) The University of Utah's Dolores Dore' Eccles Broadcast Center is the statewide public broadcasting and telecommunications facility for education in Utah. (2) The center shall provide services to citizens of the state in cooperation with higher and public education, state and local government, and private industry. (3) Distribution services provided through the center shall include KUED - TV, KUER - FM, and KUEN - TV. (4) KUED - TV and KUER - FM are licensed to the University of Utah. (5) The Utah Education and Telehealth Network's broadcast entity, KUEN - TV, is licensed to the Utah Board of Higher Education and, together with UETN, is operated on behalf of the state's systems of public and higher education. (6) All the entities referred to in Subsection (3) are under the administrative supervision of the University of Utah, subject to the authority and governance of the Utah Board of Higher Education. (7) This section neither regulates nor restricts a privately owned company in the distribution or dissemination of educational programs. Amended by Chapter 365, 2020 General Session 53B-17-101.5 Definitions. As used in this part: (1) "Board" means the Utah Education and Telehealth Network Board. (2) "Education Advisory Council" means the Utah Education Network Advisory Council created in Section 53B-17-107. (3) "Digital resource" means a digital or online library resource, including a database. (4) "Digital resource provider" means an entity that offers a digital resource to customers for license or sale.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Subscriber Lines and Cable Modems Digital Subscriber Lines and Cable Modems
    Digital Subscriber Lines and Cable Modems Digital Subscriber Lines and Cable Modems Paul Sabatino, [email protected] This paper details the impact of new advances in residential broadband networking, including ADSL, HDSL, VDSL, RADSL, cable modems. History as well as future trends of these technologies are also addressed. OtherReports on Recent Advances in Networking Back to Raj Jain's Home Page Table of Contents ● 1. Introduction ● 2. DSL Technologies ❍ 2.1 ADSL ■ 2.1.1 Competing Standards ■ 2.1.2 Trends ❍ 2.2 HDSL ❍ 2.3 SDSL ❍ 2.4 VDSL ❍ 2.5 RADSL ❍ 2.6 DSL Comparison Chart ● 3. Cable Modems ❍ 3.1 IEEE 802.14 ❍ 3.2 Model of Operation ● 4. Future Trends ❍ 4.1 Current Trials ● 5. Summary ● 6. Glossary ● 7. References http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/~jain/cis788-97/rbb/index.htm (1 of 14) [2/7/2000 10:59:54 AM] Digital Subscriber Lines and Cable Modems 1. Introduction The widespread use of the Internet and especially the World Wide Web have opened up a need for high bandwidth network services that can be brought directly to subscriber's homes. These services would provide the needed bandwidth to surf the web at lightning fast speeds and allow new technologies such as video conferencing and video on demand. Currently, Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) and Cable modem technologies look to be the most cost effective and practical methods of delivering broadband network services to the masses. <-- Back to Table of Contents 2. DSL Technologies Digital Subscriber Line A Digital Subscriber Line makes use of the current copper infrastructure to supply broadband services.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Multi–Programme TV/HDTV by Satellite
    Digital multi–programme TV/HDTV by satellite M. Cominetti (RAI) A. Morello (RAI) M. Visintin (RAI) The progress of digital technology 1. Introduction since the WARC’77 is considered and the perspectives of future The significant progress of digital techniques in applications via satellite channels production, transmission and emission of radio are identified. Among these, digital and television programmes is rapidly changing the established concepts of broadcasting. multi–programme television systems, with different quality levels (EDTV, SDTV) and possible The latest developments in VLSI (very–large scale evolution to HDTV, are evaluated in integration) technology have significantly contrib- uted to the rapid emergence of digital image/video terms of picture quality and service compression techniques in broadcast and informa- availability on the satellite channels tion–oriented applications; optical fibre technolo- of the BSS bands (12 GHz and gy allows broadband end–to–end connectivity at 22 GHz) and of the FSS band (11 very high bit–rates including digital video capabil- GHz) in Europe. A usable channel ities; even the narrow–band terrestrial broadcast capacity of 45 Mbit/s is assumed, as channels in the VHF/UHF bands (6–7 MHz and 8 well as the adoption of advanced MHz) are under investigation, in the USA [1] and channel coding techniques with in Europe [2], for the future introduction of digital QPSK and 8PSK modulations. For television services. high and medium–power satellites, in operation or planned, the The interest for digital television in broadcasting receiving antenna diameters and multimedia communications is a clear exam- required for correct reception are ple of the current evolution from the analogue to reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Bluetooth® 5
    Volume 1 Issue 1 Understanding Bluetooth® 5 Primary Logo Secondary Stacked Logo 1 Contents 3 Foreword 4 A Look Back and Ahead 5 Case Study: Bluetooth 5 Automatic Parking Meter 6 Bluetooth 5 Mesh Networking 11 Industry Experts Roundtable 14 Bluetooth 5: Your Questions Answered Weclome From the Editor For design engineers, “methods” can mean many things: The Scientific Method, for example, provides the basis for testing hypotheses. The Engineering Method allows us Editor to solve problems using a systematic approach. Method Engineering allows us to create Deborah S. Ray new methods from existing ones. And, I think we’ve all said, “There’s a method to my madness,” when creating new designs or applying existing ones in new ways. Contributing Writers Barry Manz Publishing high-quality technical content is just one method we use to enable our customers Steven Keeping and subscribers to apply technologies and electronic components in new ways and to help drive Steve Hegenderfer revolution and solutions in their various industries. Methods was conceived to provide a new format Technical Contributors to meet our readers’ evolving information needs. And with the resounding success of our Bluetooth 5 Paul Golata webinar on April 11—and the huge thirst for more information around the concepts and applica- Rudy Ramos tion of the new standard—we knew we had the topic for the first edition of our new ezine. So, like Design and Layout Method Engineering, new methods of content delivery came from a project that was underway. Ryan Snieder This first issue of Methods includes a variety of Bluetooth 5 related content that supports and extends the webinar.
    [Show full text]
  • Uen Provides Bandwidth on Demand for the Research Community
    UEN PROVIDES BANDWIDTH ON DEMAND FOR THE RESEARCH COMMUNITY What Our Customers Working with the University of Utah, the Are Saying Utah Education Network has connected the “We were able to start deploying 100G wavelengths alongside our research community with a super-fast, 100G existing 10G wavelengths right transport infrastructure built on Ciena’s 6500 away, giving us a tenfold uplift in available bandwidth capacity for the Packet-Optical Platform. local research community.” The Utah Education Network (UEN) connects all universities, school districts, schools, “It costs the same to buy and turn libraries, and anchor institutions across the state. To meet the needs of super users at up a wavelength on the Ciena the University of Utah and other research institutions, the organization needed to infrastructure as it costs to lease an upgrade its existing 10G network infrastructure. equivalent service from a third-party provider for one year. After that, we Working with the University of Utah and Ciena, with local project support from Ciena only have maintenance costs to partner CenturyLink, UEN deployed new 100G wavelengths to connect the university’s think about, which means we high-performance computing center with its new data center in downtown Salt Lake achieve major ongoing savings.” City. A third 100G connection links the university to the U.S. national research and education network, Internet2. Kevin Quire Manager of Network Engineering The new metro optical network, which is built on Ciena’s 6500, provides virtually Utah Education Network unlimited, on-demand bandwidth for the research community. It will support the diverse research portfolio of researchers and students across Utah for many years to come, offering robust scientific computing and visualization capabilities in the areas of biomedicine, genomics, geophysics, combustion, molecular dynamics, fluid dynamics, and climate modeling.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quilt a Collaboration of U.S. Research and Education Networks
    The Quilt A Collaboration of U.S. Research and Education Networks Slide 1 April 15, 2014 The Quilt The Quilt is a non-profit collaboration of our country’s advanced regional research and education networks. Created in 2000, The Quilt is a member- powered, vibrant forum where leaders from these networks come together to exchange knowledge, experience and ideas to collectively advance networking for research & education. The Quilt aims to influence the national agenda on information technology infrastructure, with particular emphasis on networking for research and education. Through this coalition, Quilt members collaborate to promote the delivery of networking services at lower cost, higher performance and greater reliability and security. Quilt members are our country’s not-for-profit networking organizations serving research and education with similar missions to; support research and education, collaborate, manage advanced networks, provide advanced networking services and further knowledge and innovation. Slide 2 April 15, 2014 Introductions • The U.S. non-profit research and education networks are funded, governed and structured differently. These aspects of the organizations reflect the diverse and complex environments of the communities and states in which they operate. • While diverse in some aspects, these organizations are similarly missioned with common goals which are to provide an advanced network infrastructure, services and applications which support of the research and education goals of the institutions each serve. Slide
    [Show full text]
  • BANDWIDTH UTILIZATION on CABLE-BASED HIGH SPEED DATA NETWORKS Terry D
    BANDWIDTH UTILIZATION ON CABLE-BASED HIGH SPEED DATA NETWORKS Terry D. Shaw, Ph. D.1 CableLabs Abstract These observations indicate the The CableLabs Bandwidth Modeling and importance of deploying DOCSIS 1.1 in Management project addresses the use, order to meet this increasing demand for management, performance simulation, and upstream capacity. Preliminary simulation network economics of cable high-speed data results indicate DOCSIS 1.1 will enable a systems. On this project, we have analyzed significant increase in upstream system consumer usage patterns based upon data carrying capacity over the already collected on live cable-based high-speed substantial capacity of DOCSIS 1.0. These data systems as well as network simulations. simulations indicate that DOCSIS 1.1 will allow almost 20% more upstream capacity Usage data on live cable networks than DOCSIS 1.0. indicate that traffic flows are fairly predictable over DOCSIS™ networks. Simulations have also been used to study Some of the primary patterns emerging the characteristics of specific types of traffic include: found on cable networks. For example, simulations of peer-to-peer applications • Skewed distribution of bandwidth indicate that one user without rate limits can consumption. As a general rule in consume up to 25% of upstream capacity many systems, 30% of the with a usage pattern resembling a very high- subscribers consume about 60% of speed constant bit-rate application. These the data. simulation results highlight the potential • Students drive seasonal benefits for cable operators to manage their characteristics. System usage is bandwidth using tools such as rate limits, appreciably higher during local service tiers, and byte caps on usage.
    [Show full text]