Entertainment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Producer's Handbook
DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER CHALLENGES A PRODUCER’S HANDBOOK by Kathy Avrich-Johnson Edited by Daphne Park Rehdner Summer 2002 Introduction and Disclaimer This handbook addresses business issues and considerations related to certain aspects of the production process, namely development and the acquisition of rights, producer relationships and low budget production. There is no neat title that encompasses these topics but what ties them together is that they are all areas that present particular challenges to emerging producers. In the course of researching this book, the issues that came up repeatedly are those that arise at the earlier stages of the production process or at the earlier stages of the producer’s career. If not properly addressed these will be certain to bite you in the end. There is more discussion of various considerations than in Canadian Production Finance: A Producer’s Handbook due to the nature of the topics. I have sought not to replicate any of the material covered in that book. What I have sought to provide is practical guidance through some tricky territory. There are often as many different agreements and approaches to many of the topics discussed as there are producers and no two productions are the same. The content of this handbook is designed for informational purposes only. It is by no means a comprehensive statement of available options, information, resources or alternatives related to Canadian development and production. The content does not purport to provide legal or accounting advice and must not be construed as doing so. The information contained in this handbook is not intended to substitute for informed, specific professional advice. -
Village Roadshow Entertainment Group Restructure
20 April 2017 VILLAGE ROADSHOW ENTERTAINMENT GROUP RESTRUCTURE Village Roadshow Entertainment Group (VREG) today released the attached announcement of a transaction with Vine Alternative Investments and Falcon Investment Advisors. Following the transaction, Village Roadshow Limited’s (VRL’s) total interest in VREG comprises: • 20% of the ordinary equity in VREG; • An option over a further 2.5% of VREG’s equity; and • US$10 million of subordinated notes (ranking in priority to the ordinary equity of VREG), repayable by November 2022, with a non-cash return of 15.5% p.a. This represents a restructure of VRL’s entire existing interests in VREG, without additional funding from VRL, and there will be no impact on VRL’s accounts. Co-Chairman and Co-CEO of VRL, Mr Graham Burke, will continue as Chairman of Village Roadshow Pictures and Mr Burke and Mr Robert Kirby, Co-Chairman and Co-CEO of VRL, will remain Directors of VREG. For personal use only VILLAGE ROADSHOW LIMITED | ABN 43 010 672 054 | LEVEL 1, 500 CHAPEL STREET, SOUTH YARRA, VIC, AUSTRALIA 3141 | T + 61 3 9281 1000 villageroadshow.com.au VILLAGE ROADSHOW ENTERTAINMENT GROUP VILLAGE ROADSHOW ENTERTAINMENT GROUP EXPANDS GLOBAL CONTENT PLATFORM WITH SIGNIFICANT CAPITAL FROM VINE ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS Vine Acquires Majority Shareholding in VREG; Company to Increase Slate, IP Development, Partnerships and Platforms April 20, 2017 – Los Angeles, CA – Village Roadshow Entertainment Group (VREG) is expanding and complementing the Company’s business model as a leading co-financier and co- producer of filmed entertainment into selectively developing and acquiring its own IP and producing content across a breadth of platforms with both existing and new partners. -
A Dark New World : Anatomy of Australian Horror Films
A dark new world: Anatomy of Australian horror films Mark David Ryan Faculty of Creative Industries, Queensland University of Technology A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the degree Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), December 2008 The Films (from top left to right): Undead (2003); Cut (2000); Wolf Creek (2005); Rogue (2007); Storm Warning (2006); Black Water (2007); Demons Among Us (2006); Gabriel (2007); Feed (2005). ii KEY WORDS Australian horror films; horror films; horror genre; movie genres; globalisation of film production; internationalisation; Australian film industry; independent film; fan culture iii ABSTRACT After experimental beginnings in the 1970s, a commercial push in the 1980s, and an underground existence in the 1990s, from 2000 to 2007 contemporary Australian horror production has experienced a period of strong growth and relative commercial success unequalled throughout the past three decades of Australian film history. This study explores the rise of contemporary Australian horror production: emerging production and distribution models; the films produced; and the industrial, market and technological forces driving production. Australian horror production is a vibrant production sector comprising mainstream and underground spheres of production. Mainstream horror production is an independent, internationally oriented production sector on the margins of the Australian film industry producing titles such as Wolf Creek (2005) and Rogue (2007), while underground production is a fan-based, indie filmmaking subculture, producing credit-card films such as I know How Many Runs You Scored Last Summer (2006) and The Killbillies (2002). Overlap between these spheres of production, results in ‘high-end indie’ films such as Undead (2003) and Gabriel (2007) emerging from the underground but crossing over into the mainstream. -
BULLETIN for FILM and VIDEO INFORMATION Vol. 1,No.1
EXHIBITION AND PROGRAMMING in New York : BULLETIN FOR FILM AND VIDEO INFORMATION Independent Film Showcases Film Archives, 80 Wooster st. N.Y.,N.Y.10012 Vol. 1,No .1,January 1974 Anthology (212)758-6327 Collective for the Living Cinema, 108 E 64St . N.Y.,NY.10021 Forum, 256 W 88 St . N.Y .,N .Y.10024 (212)362-0503 Editor : Hollis Melton ; Publisher : Anthology Film Archives ; Film Millennium, 46 Great Jones St. N.Y .,N.Y.10003, (212) 228-9998 Address: 80 Wooster st., New York, N .Y. 10012; Yearly subscription : $2 Museum of Modern Art, 11 W 53 St . N.Y.,N.Y.10019 (212) 956-7078 U-P Screen, 814 Broadway at E 11th St . N.Y. N.Y. 10003 Whitney Museum, 945 Madison Ave . at 75St . N.Y.,N.Y.10021 (212) 861-5322 needs of independent The purpose of this bulletin is to serve the information San :Francisco : their users. The bulletin is organized around five film and video-makers and Canyon Cinematheque,San Francisco Art Institute, 800 Chestnut St., film and video-making ; distribution ; exhibition aspects of film and video: San Francisco, Ca . (415) 332-1514 ; study; and preservation . There is very little in this iddue and programming Film Archive, University Art Museum, Berkeley, Ca. 94720 due to a lack of response from video-makers . Your suggetions and Pacific on video (415) 642-1412 comments will be welcomed . San Francisco Museum of Art, Van Ness & McAllister Streets, San Francisco Ca. (415) 863-8800 DISTRIBUTION that Include Screening Work by A brief note on non-exclusive distribution Regional Centers with Film Programs Independent Film-makers. -
A Filmmakers' Guide to Distribution and Exhibition
A Filmmakers’ Guide to Distribution and Exhibition A Filmmakers’ Guide to Distribution and Exhibition Written by Jane Giles ABOUT THIS GUIDE 2 Jane Giles is a film programmer and writer INTRODUCTION 3 Edited by Pippa Eldridge and Julia Voss SALES AGENTS 10 Exhibition Development Unit, bfi FESTIVALS 13 THEATRIC RELEASING: SHORTS 18 We would like to thank the following people for their THEATRIC RELEASING: FEATURES 27 contribution to this guide: PLANNING A CINEMA RELEASE 32 NON-THEATRIC RELEASING 40 Newton Aduaka, Karen Alexander/bfi, Clare Binns/Zoo VIDEO Cinemas, Marc Boothe/Nubian Tales, Paul Brett/bfi, 42 Stephen Brown/Steam, Pamela Casey/Atom Films, Chris TELEVISION 44 Chandler/Film Council, Ben Cook/Lux Distribution, INTERNET 47 Emma Davie, Douglas Davis/Atom Films, CASE STUDIES 52 Jim Dempster/bfi, Catharine Des Forges/bfi, Alnoor GLOSSARY 60 Dewshi, Simon Duffy/bfi, Gavin Emerson, Alexandra FESTIVAL & EVENTS CALENDAR 62 Finlay/Channel 4, John Flahive/bfi, Nicki Foster/ CONTACTS 64 McDonald & Rutter, Satwant Gill/British Council, INDEX 76 Gwydion Griffiths/S4C, Liz Harkman/Film Council, Tony Jones/City Screen, Tinge Krishnan/Disruptive Element Films, Luned Moredis/Sgrîn, Méabh O’Donovan/Short CONTENTS Circuit, Kate Ogborn, Nicola Pierson/Edinburgh BOXED INFORMATION: HOW TO APPROACH THE INDUSTRY 4 International Film Festival, Lisa Marie Russo, Erich BEST ADVICE FROM INDUSTRY PROFESSIONALS 5 Sargeant/bfi, Cary Sawney/bfi, Rita Smith, Heather MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS 5 Stewart/bfi, John Stewart/Oil Factory, Gary DEALS & CONTRACTS 8 Thomas/Arts Council of England, Peter Todd/bfi, Zoë SHORT FILM BUREAU 11 Walton, Laurel Warbrick-Keay/bfi, Sheila Whitaker/ LONDON & EDINBURGH 16 article27, Christine Whitehouse/bfi BLACK & ASIAN FILMS 17 SHORT CIRCUIT 19 Z00 CINEMAS 20 The editors have made every endeavour to ensure the BRITISH BOARD OF FILM CLASSIFICATION 21 information in this guide is correct at the time of GOOD FILMS GOOD PROGRAMMING 22 going to press. -
View Annual Report
VILLAGE ROADSHOW LIMITED 1999 Annual Report Founder’s Report Contents Dear Shareholders Founder’s Report My purpose in creating Village Roadshow in the 1950s was to build a company with 2 Corporate Overview strong foundations for the long term. I have seen and been part of many difficult 4 Summary of Major Business Units periods of this industry in my career. It is pleasing that your management team has brought the Company through this tough period recently with stronger results in most 6 Financial Highlights areas other than Cinema Exhibition. This says much about the powerful foundations 8 Ten Year Financial Summary of today’s Village Roadshow– its strength in radio, distribution, film production and 10 Chairman’s Report theme parks. And its management depth of talent and dedication. These assets, with the immediate outlook of better film product, demonstrates to me that the foundations 12 Managing Director’s Report for growth are strong indeed. 14 Board of Directors As a shareholder, and as one who knows the Company well, I am confident that the 16 Senior Executive Team Company is well positioned to deliver increased shareholder value in the future; the 18 Exhibition foundations are in place to allow me to share my confidence with you. 22 Distribution Roc Kirby AM 23 Production 24 Radio 25 Theme Parks 26 Corporate Governance 29 Financial Statements 30 Directors’ Report 34 Profit and Loss Statement 35 Balance Sheet 36 Statement of Cash Flows 37 Notes to the Financial Statements 76 Directors’ Declaration 76 Independent Audit Report 77 Additional Information 78 Actual Group EBITDA by Division 79 Significant Differences between Australian GAAP and US GAAP 82 Share Register Information and Directory Front cover: The Matrix Village Roadshow Limited ACN 010 672 054 1 Corporate Overview Objectives Strategies Highlights Village Roadshow’s primary aim To achieve the Company’s Increased cinema circuit by 416 is the maximisation of long-term objectives, the following strategies screens and 85 sites since the last shareholder value. -
Film Financing
2017 An Outsider’s Glimpse into Filmmaking AN EXPLORATION ON RECENT OREGON FILM & TV PROJECTS BY THEO FRIEDMAN ! ! Page | !1 Contents Tracktown (2016) .......................................................................................................................6 The Benefits of Gusbandry (2016- ) .........................................................................................8 Portlandia (2011- ) .....................................................................................................................9 The Haunting of Sunshine Girl (2010- ) ...................................................................................10 Green Room (2015) & I Don’t Feel at Home in This World Anymore (2017) ...........................11 Network & Experience ............................................................................................................12 Financing .................................................................................................................................12 Filming ....................................................................................................................................13 Distribution ...............................................................................................................................13 In Conclusion ...........................................................................................................................13 Financing Terms .....................................................................................................................15 -
Cinema and New Technologies: the Development of Digital
CINEMA AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES: THE DEVELOPMENT OF DIGITAL VIDEO FILMMAKING IN WEST AFRICA S. BENAGR Ph.D 2012 UNIVERSITY OF BEDFORDSHIRE CINEMA AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES: THE DEVELOPMENT OF DIGITAL VIDEO FILMMAKING IN WEST AFRICA by S. BENAGR A thesis submitted to the University of Bedfordshire in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy February 2012 2 Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................. 5 LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................ 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ...................................................................................... 7 DEDICATION: ....................................................................................................... 8 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................ 9 ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................... 13 Chapter One: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 14 1.1 Key Questions of the Research ................................................................... 14 1.2 Methodologies ............................................................................................. 21 1.3 Context: Ghana and Burkina Faso .............................................................. 28 1.4 Context: Development of Film Cultures .................................................... -
1 WELCOME to the NEW WORLD of DISTRIBUTION by Peter Broderick
WELCOME TO THE NEW WORLD OF DISTRIBUTION By Peter Broderick (First appeared in indieWIRE, September 16 & 17, 2008) Welcome to the New World of Distribution. Many filmmakers are emigrating from the Old World, where they have little chance of succeeding. They are attracted by unprecedented opportunities and the freedom to shape their own destiny. Life in the New World requires them to work harder, be more tenacious, and take more risks. There are daunting challenges and no guarantees of success. But this hasn’t stopped more and more intrepid filmmakers from exploring uncharted territory and staking claims. Before the discovery of the New World, the Old World of Distribution reigned supreme. It is a hierarchical realm where filmmakers must petition the powers that be to grant them distribution. Independents who are able to make overall deals are required to give distributors total control of the marketing and distribution of their films. The terms of these deals have gotten worse and few filmmakers end up satisfied. All is not well for companies and filmmakers in what I call the Old World of Distribution. At Film Independent’s Film Financing Conference, Mark Gill vividly described “the ways the independent film business is in trouble” in his widely read and discussed keynote. Mark listed the companies and divisions that have been shut down or are teetering on the brink of bankruptcy, noted that five others are in “serious financial peril,” and said that ten independent film financiers may soon “exit the business.” Mark made a persuasive case that “the sky really is falling… because the accumulation of bad news is kind of awe-inspiring.” While he doesn’t 1 expect that the sky will “hit the ground everywhere,” he warned “it will feel like we just survived a medieval plague. -
What Killed Australian Cinema & Why Is the Bloody Corpse Still Moving?
What Killed Australian Cinema & Why is the Bloody Corpse Still Moving? A Thesis Submitted By Jacob Zvi for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Faculty of Health, Arts & Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne © Jacob Zvi 2019 Swinburne University of Technology All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. II Abstract In 2004, annual Australian viewership of Australian cinema, regularly averaging below 5%, reached an all-time low of 1.3%. Considering Australia ranks among the top nations in both screens and cinema attendance per capita, and that Australians’ biggest cultural consumption is screen products and multi-media equipment, suggests that Australians love cinema, but refrain from watching their own. Why? During its golden period, 1970-1988, Australian cinema was operating under combined private and government investment, and responsible for critical and commercial successes. However, over the past thirty years, 1988-2018, due to the detrimental role of government film agencies played in binding Australian cinema to government funding, Australian films are perceived as under-developed, low budget, and depressing. Out of hundreds of films produced, and investment of billions of dollars, only a dozen managed to recoup their budget. The thesis demonstrates how ‘Australian national cinema’ discourse helped funding bodies consolidate their power. Australian filmmaking is defined by three ongoing and unresolved frictions: one external and two internal. Friction I debates Australian cinema vs. Australian audience, rejecting Australian cinema’s output, resulting in Frictions II and III, which respectively debate two industry questions: what content is produced? arthouse vs. -
SQ Annual Review 2017-18
17 > Celeste ANNUAL REVIEW 18 CONTACT Head Office Address: Gold Coast Office Address: Suite 1/30 Florence Street c/o Village Roadshow Studios Newstead Qld 4006 Building 9A, Entertainment Road Australia Oxenford QLD 4210 T. +61 7 3248 0500 Australia E. [email protected] Postal Address: PO Box 15094 City East Brisbane Qld 4002 Australia Screen Queensland's purpose is to grow the screen industry to be a significant contributor to the economic and cultural wellbeing of Queensland. > Harrow Screen Queensland ACN 056 169 316 ABN 20 056 169 316 Published by Screen Queensland 2018 Also published on screenqld.com.au -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All figures noted in this Annual Report, including Queensland Production Expenditure (QPE) and jobs, are for the productions given funding in the 2017-18 Financial Year which may or may not have gone into principal photography. > Cover image - Tidelands In the 2017–18 Financial Year, Screen Queensland funded 28 film and television screen productions and games, which generated an estimated $168 million in direct Queensland Production Expenditure (QPE) and more than 1,960 employment opportunities for Queenslanders. > CONTENTS Message from The Premier of Queensland 5 Screen Queensland Chair 7 Look What We Achieved Together 8 2017-18 Highlights 10 Production in Queensland 14 New Initiatives in Screen 18 Screen Support Programs 26 Production Attraction Funding Program 30 Dora the -
Who Owns the Network News
Who Owns The Network News Janus Capital Corporation owns 6% MUSIC American Recordings, Asylum Atlantic, Atlantic Classics, Atlantic Jazz, Atlantic Nashville, Atlantic National Amusements Inc. (68%) AOL/ Theater, Big Beat, Breaking, Coalition, Curb, East Murdoch family controls 30% GENERAL ELECTRIC West, Elektra, Giant, Igloo, Lava, Mesa/Bluemoon, AT&T owns 8% OTHER Maverick (w/Madonna), Modern, Nonsuch, Qwest, Strong Capital Management 9% BET Design Studio (w/G-III MOVIES 143 (joint venture), Reprise, Reprise Nashville, BOOKS Waddell & Reed Asset Management Co. 9% VIACOM INC Apparel Group, Ltd.) produces SPORTS 2000 revenues: $111.6 billion APPLIANCES TIME WARNER and distributes Exsto XXIV VII Warner Bros. (75% w/25% AT&T), New Line 2000 revenues: $36.2 billion Revolution, Sire, Strickly Rhythm (joint venture), News America imprints include HarperCollins, (all owned 25% w/29% AT&T and 46% CABLEVISION) Walt Disney Company clothing and accessories GE, Hotpoint, Monogram, Profile and other Cinema, Fine Line Features; Castle Rock Teldec, Warner Nashville, Warner Alliance, Warner NEWS CORPORATION Regan Books, William Morrow and Avon; Madison Square Garden Arena and Theater; 2000 Revenues: $25.4 billion brand name appliances; Light bulbs and Entertainment; Warner Bros. joint ventures Resound, Warner Sunset, Other intrests include: 2000 Revenues: $14 billion Zondervan, largest commercial Bible imprint Management and operation of Hartford Civic lighting fixtures THE WALT DISNEY include Bel-Air Entertainment (w/Canal+), Warner/Chappell Music (publishing),