DOCSLIB.ORG

Robots and Automation Robots and Automation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Robots and Automation Robots and Automation Issue: Robots and Automation Robots and Automation By: Bill Wanlund Pub. Date: February 9, 2015 Access Date: September 26, 2021 DOI: 10.1177/2374556815571549 Source URL: http://businessresearcher.sagepub.com/sbr-1645-94777-2641309/20150209/robots-and-automation ©2021 SAGE Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ©2021 SAGE Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Will technological advances help businesses and workers? Executive Summary Fueled by advances in computer and sensor technology, robots are growing in sophistication and versatility to become an important—and controversial—sector of the world economy. Once largely limited to manufacturing plants, robots now are found in households, offices and hospitals, and on farms and highways. Some believe robots are a job creator, a boon to corporate productivity and profits, and a way to “reshore” American manufacturing that had migrated to countries where labor was cheaper. Others fear that the growing use of robots will wipe out millions of lower-skilled jobs, threatening the economic security of the working poor, fostering social inequality and leading to economic stagnation. Today's managers need to understand how humans and machines can best work together; government and industry must decide how best to manage robots' design, manufacture and use. Overview Drew Greenblatt, president and CEO of Marlin Steel Wire Products of Baltimore, says introducing robots into his manufacturing operation was “imperative: Our choice was either extinction or transformation.” When Greenblatt bought Marlin in 1998, the company—then based in Brooklyn, N.Y.— made steel baskets for bagel shops. And the overseas competition was murderous. “We were confronted with finished baskets from Asia that cost less than my cost for the steel alone,” Greenblatt says. “We had an untenable business proposition, where we were losing money on every basket. We had to transform.” Marlin made its first investment in automation—a robotic wire bender with a built-in robotic welder—in 1999. Today, the company uses five robots and expects to add three more by the end of 2015. Marlin's human workforce has grown, too, from 17 employees in 1999—“most of them earning minimum wage with no benefits,” or about $15,000 a year, Greenblatt says—to 29 today. The lowest starting salary now is $35,000, he says, and the company provides a 401(k) retirement savings plan and health insurance for every worker. Robots have allowed Marlin to expand production beyond baskets to other wire-formed and sheet metal products. And, he adds, sales are up—from $800,000 in 1998 to $6 million in 2014. Robots “saved the company,” Greenblatt says. Robots “saved the company,” says Drew Greenblatt, CEO of Marlin Steel Wire Products in Baltimore. Marlin's automated workers are among the estimated 230,000 industrial robots in use in (Matt McClain/The Washington Post via Getty the United States, according to the Robotic Industries Association (RIA), a trade Images) organization based in Ann Arbor, Mich. But robots are relatively scarce in places like Marlin—small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), says RIA President Jeff Burnstein. “The automotive industry accounts for more than half” of U.S. industrial robots, Burnstein says, while “only about 10 percent of the U.S. companies that could benefit from robots have installed any so far. Most of the 300,000 SMEs [in the United States] have yet to install even one robot.” Industrial Robots Drive Growth in Spending Worldwide spending on robotics, $U.S. billion, 2000–25 Page 2 of 19 Robots and Automation SAGE Business Researcher ©2021 SAGE Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Note: 2015, 2020 and 2025 figures are estimates. Source: Alison Sander and Meldon Wolfgang, “The Rise of Robotics,” Boston Consulting Group, Aug. 27, 2014, http://tinyurl.com/mo6r8pm According to projections, industrial users will spend more than $24 billion on robotics by 2025, the largest share of the projected $67 billion global spending that year. Analysts predict commercial robotic spending will jump by $11 billion between 2015 and 2025, while personal market spending will grow by $6.5 billion. Robots are a boon to business because they can increase labor productivity, reduce payroll costs (thus allowing U.S. manufacturers to better compete with foreign competitors), increase profit margins and fill jobs suffering from worker shortages, say robotics proponents. Business consultant Jeff Holmberg of accounting firm Froehling Anderson in Minneapolis says, “Robots can far outperform their human counterparts at precision or repetitive tasks, both in terms of processes per hour and the number of hours that they can operate. As an added bonus, robots don't get bored, need time off or complain.” But some economists fear the robot revolution will lead to massive job losses as machines take over work that had been the domain of humans. Karl Fogel, a partner with technology consultants Open Tech Strategies, told the Pew Research Center, “The reason [businesses] are investing in machine agents is precisely that they will replace more [lower-paid] humans than the number of [more highly paid] humans needed to build and maintain the machines…. We're going to have to come to grips with a long-term employment crisis and the fact that— strictly from an economic point of view, not a moral point of view—there are more and more ‘surplus humans.’” 1 Economist Erik Brynjolfsson, director of the MIT Center for Digital Business, says that technological change is contributing to job losses and to stagnating incomes. “It's the great paradox of our era,” he said. “Productivity is at record levels, innovation has never been faster, and yet at the same time, we have a falling median income and we have fewer jobs. People are falling behind because technology is advancing so fast and our skills and organizations aren't keeping up.” 2 Rob Atkinson, president of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a Washington think tank that promotes incorporation of innovative technologies into public policies, disagreed. “Automation has never led to fewer jobs in the economy in the past and never will in the future, for the simple reason that automation lowers prices, which increases demand for goods and services, which in turn creates jobs,” he said. 3 Jeff Trinkle, program director at the National Science Foundation for the National Robotics Initiative (NRI), a multi-agency federal initiative that supports robot research in areas of national priority, says, “The continued evolution of robotics will lead to job creation in some areas and losses in others, with an overall gain in productivity and standard of living. This has been the case for essentially every major technological advance in modern history. If the U.S. were to decide not to develop robotics further, because robots might take away some jobs, I believe we'd be making a big mistake. The rest of the world would continue on with robotics development, and would gain in productivity relative to the U.S. By focusing on ways that people and robots can work together, the U.S. will remain strong leaders in robotics and will be able to ensure that robotics technologies are deployed equitably.” Page 3 of 19 Robots and Automation SAGE Business Researcher ©2021 SAGE Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. A 2014 poll of 1,896 technology experts found respondents split over how advances in artificial intelligence and robotics will affect employment. Fifty-two percent thought the technologies would either have no effect on overall employment or would create “new jobs designing, building, servicing, and utilizing the same technologies that are displacing other types of work.” But 48 percent were more pessimistic. Dave Kissoondoyal, CEO of business consulting firm KMP Global, told the pollsters, “Networked, automated, artificial intelligence applications and robotic devices will have displaced more jobs than they have created by 2025.” 4 Cage-Free Robots In the past, industrial robots worked in isolation, caged off to keep humans out of harm's way as they manipulated, welded and sorted the objects at dizzying speeds on the assembly line. Mike Taubitz, former global director of safety and ergonomics for General Motors and now an independent industrial safety consultant, says that, in the 1980s, “big, clumsy hydraulic robots were the rule. Control wasn't very good, employees trying to program one were at risk of the thing running off in an unpredictable direction. So we put guarding and cages around them, with interlocking systems.” But caged robots have drawbacks. They typically use expensive proprietary software that requires considerable programming expertise, their safety cages occupy valuable factory floor space and many of them are priced beyond the budget of small or medium-sized businesses. Now a new generation of industrial robot is emerging, designed to work safely alongside humans. They are relatively inexpensive—prices generally run $20,000 to $35,000 per unit, compared with $60,000 and up for a new “conventional” preprogrammed caged robot. These machines, known as co-bots, can easily be programmed to perform a variety of light, repetitive tasks such as moving, sorting and shipping merchandise, according to their manufacturers, and they are fitted with sophisticated sensors to stop their processes immediately if unexpected contact—such as bumping into a human worker—occurs. Social roboticist Heather Knight, who studies human-robot interaction at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), thinks co-bots offer a good social as well as industrial automation model. “Instead of replacing a factory worker with a robot,” she says, “you could have … humans and robots working side by side, making use of what the person is good at and what the robot is good at. You would have these human- robot teams that would function as a unit of creation.” Co-bots have been fairly slow to catch on. Universal Robots of Odense, Denmark, a co-bot manufacturing pioneer, has sold only about 2,500 worldwide since it began manufacturing them in 2008.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Robotics and Autonomous Systems
    Spring 2015 Industry Study Final Report Robotics and Autonomous Systems The Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy National Defense University Fort McNair, Washington, D.C. 20319-5062 i ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS 2015 ABSTRACT: The Robotics and Autonomous Systems (RAS) industry plays a critical role producing America’s preferred means of global power projection: unmanned aircraft systems. But in a larger sense, RAS technology has also altered the defense industry’s relationship with DoD, as the defense sector increasingly finds itself following commercial sector innovations. This report outlines the major issues affecting the defense sector of the RAS industry and DoD’s ability to acquire and employ RAS. It then makes recommendations to enable DoD to better capitalize on the technology, strengthen its relationship with the industry and ultimately improve the nation’s warfighting capability. BG Mordechay Baruch, Israeli Defense Force LTC Clinton Cox, US Army Mr. Terry Emmert, Office Secretary Defense COL Daniel Friend, US Army Mr. Riley Jay, National Geospatial Agency Lt Col Linell Letendre, US Air Force Lt Col Robert Masaitis, US Air Force Mr. David Mico, Dept of State Lt Col Kevin Murray, US Marine Corps Lt Col Richard Neitzey, US Marine Corps Dr. Jeffery Paull, Dept of Navy CDR Jerome Smith, US Navy COL Stephanie Tutton, US Army Mr. Thomas Wilson, Veterans Affairs Lt Col Lori Winn, US Air Force CAPT Matthew Pregmon, US Navy, Faculty lead COL David Shugart, US Army, Faculty ii PLACES VISITED Domestic:
    [Show full text]
  • The Robotics Market First Half 2012 Results and Trends
    The Robotics Market First Half 2012 Results and Trends This report is based on data supplied to RIA by its member companies. The numbers represent the industrial robot units ordered and shipped, plus the dollar value added to the total robot system. RIA does not include numbers that other countries reporting to the International Federation of Robotics might include as robot units; e.g., RIA does not include four axis chip placement devices in standard electronic assembly machines. Table of Contents 1. First Half News Release 2. First Half 2012 -Application Trends — New Orders • Assembling and Disassembling • Processing • Dispensing • Welding and Soldering (all materials) • Handling Operations/Machine Tending • Other First Half 2012 - Application Trends — Shipments • Assembling and Disassembling • Processing • Dispensing • Welding and Soldering (all materials) • Handling Operations/Machine Tending • Other 3. 2012 vs. 2011 New Orders and Shipments Totals — Units 2012 vs. 2011 New Orders and Shipments Totals — Dollars Robotic Industries Association 900 Victors Way, Suite140 Contact: Jeff Burnstein Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108 USA President Telephone: (734) 994-6088 (734) 994-6088 Fax: (734) 994-3338 [email protected] www.Robotics.org PRESS RELEASE North American Robotics Industry Posts Best Quarter Ever, According to New Statistics from RIA (Ann Arbor, Michigan – July 26, 2012) North American robotics companies sold more industrial robots in the second quarter of 2012 than any previous quarter in history, according to new statistics released by Robotic Industries Association (RIA), the industry’s trade group. A total of 5,556 robots valued at $403.1 million were sold to North American companies, a jump of 14% in units and 28% in dollars over the same quarter in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Robotics: a Tool for Application-Based Integration of Multidisciplinary Undergraduate Concepts and Research
    AC 2010-22: MOBILE ROBOTICS: A TOOL FOR APPLICATION-BASED INTEGRATION OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY UNDERGRADUATE CONCEPTS AND RESEARCH Carlotta Berry, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Berry is an assistant professor in the department of electrical and computer engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She is one of the principal investigators on the multidisciplinary educational robotics initiative and the Rose building undergraduate diversity program. Her research areas include the design and evaluation of human-robot interfaces and innovations in engineering education using active learning and mobile robotics. Page 15.877.1 Page © American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 “Mobile Robotics: A tool for application-based integration of multidisciplinary undergraduate concepts and research” Abstract This paper presents the development of a mobile robotics course at the primarily undergraduate engineering school, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. This course is one of the final courses in the multidisciplinary educational robotics certificate program. The purpose of this course is to use the robot to provide the students with an appreciation of their discipline and how it applies to other disciplines. It is hypothesized that students will gain a more realistic model of their future workplace demographic while also learning about robotics theory and the open areas of robotics research. Introduction Undergraduate students in science and engineering frequently express a desire to relate the abstract theory presented in class to real-world or practical application. One method that can be used to integrate component theory with system or practical application is robotics. Since robotics theory includes topics such as sensors, controls, mechatronics, kinematics, microcontroller programming, embedded systems and software development; it is an ideal model for multidisciplinary application.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Robotics: Timeline
    History of Robotics: Timeline This history of robotics is intertwined with the histories of technology, science and the basic principle of progress. Technology used in computing, electricity, even pneumatics and hydraulics can all be considered a part of the history of robotics. The timeline presented is therefore far from complete. Robotics currently represents one of mankind’s greatest accomplishments and is the single greatest attempt of mankind to produce an artificial, sentient being. It is only in recent years that manufacturers are making robotics increasingly available and attainable to the general public. The focus of this timeline is to provide the reader with a general overview of robotics (with a focus more on mobile robots) and to give an appreciation for the inventors and innovators in this field who have helped robotics to become what it is today. RobotShop Distribution Inc., 2008 www.robotshop.ca www.robotshop.us Greek Times Some historians affirm that Talos, a giant creature written about in ancient greek literature, was a creature (either a man or a bull) made of bronze, given by Zeus to Europa. [6] According to one version of the myths he was created in Sardinia by Hephaestus on Zeus' command, who gave him to the Cretan king Minos. In another version Talos came to Crete with Zeus to watch over his love Europa, and Minos received him as a gift from her. There are suppositions that his name Talos in the old Cretan language meant the "Sun" and that Zeus was known in Crete by the similar name of Zeus Tallaios.
    [Show full text]
  • An Industrial Robotics Course for Manufacturing Engineers
    Paper ID #15654 An Industrial Robotics Course for Manufacturing Engineers Dr. Jeffrey L. Newcomer, Western Washington University Dr. Jeffrey L. Newcomer is a Professor of Manufacturing Engineering and Chair of the Engineering and Design Department at Western Washington University. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 An Industrial Robotics Course for Manufacturing Engineers For many years the automobile industry was the home to more than half of the robots used in U.S. manufacturing. Recently, however, many other industries have been or are planning to introduce robots into their manufacturing processes.1 In the Pacific Northwest region several companies in aerospace, electronics, apparel, and commercial cookware have either introduced robots or ex- panded their use in recent years. As such, an introduction to robotics in the context of manufac- turing is becoming more important for students pursuing degrees in Manufacturing Engineering. There is, however, always a challenge when teaching robotics to find the correct balance between application and modeling. Many robotics courses taught in Electrical or Mechanical Engineering Departments have a tendency to emphasize modeling over application, but a well-prepared Man- ufacturing Engineer needs to understand where the challenges in robotics applications lie as well as understanding what is going on ‘under the hood’. A quick survey of the 21 ABET accredited Manufacturing Engineering programs indicates that only five have a manufacturing specific ro- botics course, and three of those are special topics courses that are not offered consistently.2 Other programs have robotics integrated into a general automation class, have cross-listed classes with other programs, or have graduate classes on robotics that are available to seniors, so there are not the same opportunities for depth or focus on manufacturing applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Ph. D. Thesis Stable Locomotion of Humanoid Robots Based
    Ph. D. Thesis Stable locomotion of humanoid robots based on mass concentrated model Author: Mario Ricardo Arbul´uSaavedra Director: Carlos Balaguer Bernaldo de Quiros, Ph. D. Department of System and Automation Engineering Legan´es, October 2008 i Ph. D. Thesis Stable locomotion of humanoid robots based on mass concentrated model Author: Mario Ricardo Arbul´uSaavedra Director: Carlos Balaguer Bernaldo de Quiros, Ph. D. Signature of the board: Signature President Vocal Vocal Vocal Secretary Rating: Legan´es, de de Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 HistoryofRobots........................... 2 1.1.1 Industrialrobotsstory. 2 1.1.2 Servicerobots......................... 4 1.1.3 Science fiction and robots currently . 10 1.2 Walkingrobots ............................ 10 1.2.1 Outline ............................ 10 1.2.2 Themes of legged robots . 13 1.2.3 Alternative mechanisms of locomotion: Wheeled robots, tracked robots, active cords . 15 1.3 Why study legged machines? . 20 1.4 What control mechanisms do humans and animals use? . 25 1.5 What are problems of biped control? . 27 1.6 Features and applications of humanoid robots with biped loco- motion................................. 29 1.7 Objectives............................... 30 1.8 Thesiscontents ............................ 33 2 Humanoid robots 35 2.1 Human evolution to biped locomotion, intelligence and bipedalism 36 2.2 Types of researches on humanoid robots . 37 2.3 Main humanoid robot research projects . 38 2.3.1 The Humanoid Robot at Waseda University . 38 2.3.2 Hondarobots......................... 47 2.3.3 TheHRPproject....................... 51 2.4 Other humanoids . 54 2.4.1 The Johnnie project . 54 2.4.2 The Robonaut project . 55 2.4.3 The COG project .
    [Show full text]
  • The Laws of Robots Law, Governance and Technology Series
    The Laws of Robots Law, Governance and Technology Series VOLUME 10 Series Editors: POMPEU CASANOVAS, Institute of Law and Technology, UAB, Spain GIOVANNI SARTOR, University of Bologna (Faculty of Law -CIRSFID) and European University Institute of Florence, Italy Scientifi c Advisory Board: GIANMARIA AJANI, University of Turin, Italy; KEVIN ASHLEY, University of Pittsburgh, USA; KATIE ATKINSON, University of Liverpool, UK; TREVOR J.M. BENCH-CAPON, University of Liverpool, UK; V. RICHARDS BENJAMINS, Telefonica, Spain; GUIDO BOELLA, Universita’ degli Studi di Torino, Italy; JOOST BREUKER, Universiteit van Amsterdam, The Netherlands; DANIÈLE BOURCIER, University of Paris 2-CERSA, France; TOM BRUCE, Cornell University, USA; NURIA CASELLAS, Institute of Law and Technology, UAB, Spain; CRISTIANO CASTELFRANCHI, ISTC-CNR, Italy; JACK G. CONRAD, Thomson Reuters, USA; ROSARIA CONTE, ISTC-CNR, Italy; FRANCESCO CONTINI, IRSIG-CNR, Italy; JESÚS CONTRERAS, iSOCO, Spain; JOHN DAVIES, British Telecommunications plc, UK; JOHN DOMINGUE, The Open University, UK; JAIME DELGADO, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Spain; MARCO FABRI, IRSIG-CNR, Italy; DIETER FENSEL, University of Innsbruck, Austria; ENRICO FRANCESCONI, ITTIG - CNR, Italy; FERNANDO GALINDO, Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain; ALDO GANGEMI, ISTC-CNR, Italy; MICHAEL GENESERETH, Stanford University, USA; ASUNCIÓN GÓMEZ-PÉREZ, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain; THOMAS F. GORDON, Fraunhofer FOKUS, Germany; GUIDO GOVERNATORI, NICTA, Australia; GRAHAM GREENLEAF, The University of New South Wales,
    [Show full text]
  • "Rethink Robotics: Finding a Market". Stanford Casepublisher 204-2013
    S TANFORD U NIVERSITY 2 0 1 3 - 2 0 4 - 1 S CHOOL OF E NGINEERING C ASEP UBLISHER Rev. June 3, 2013 Duhamel et al. “Rethink Robotics - Finding a Market” Stanford CasePublisher 204-2013-1. 20 May 2013. RETHINK ROBOTICS - FINDING A MARKET T ABLE OF C ONTENTS Introduction 1. Industry Overview 2. History of Rethink Robotics 3. Management 4. Technology 5. Financing 6. Rethink Corporate Strategy 7. Future Trends 8. References 9. Exhibits 10. Authors Professors Micah Siegel (Stanford University) and Fred Gibbons (Stanford University) guided the de- velopment of this case using the CasePublisher service as the basis for class discussion rather than to i$us- trate either e%ective or ine%ective handling of a business situation. S TANFORD 204-2013-01 Rethink Robotics Introduction !Since 1980, millions of manufacturing jobs have been outsourced to reduce labor costs in order to maintain competitiveness in the evolving global market for products. "1] While reducing cost, this has reduced the number of middle-income jobs in developed na- tions. Furthermore, outsourcing has created problems for firms that now operate in politi- cally and/or economically unstable regions. "2] Rethink Robotics hopes that its automated manufacturing robot, Baxter, will enable domestic firms to competitively insource manufac- turing jobs and thus improve e%ciency. Rethink Robotics was founded by Rodney Brooks in 2008 to build a low-cost, adaptive manufacturing robot. The original name, Heartland Robotics, reflects the company's ambi- tions to combat outsourcing. "3] In a 2012 press release, Brooks stated, “Rethink Robot- ics…will do for manufacturing workers what the PC did for o%ce workers & increase their productivity by giving them direct access to technological tools.” "4] Their distinctive ro- botic workforce is marketed as simpler, safer, smarter, and cheaper than traditional indus- trial robots.
    [Show full text]
  • Using a Single Cell to Create an Entire Organ
    Message from the LARS/SBR 2016 General and Program Chairs The 13th Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS 2016) and the 4th Brazilian Symposium on Robotics (SBR 2016) aims to promote a comprehensive scientific meeting in the area of intelligent robotics, bringing together researchers and undergraduate and graduate students studying computer science, electrical engineering, mechatronics engineering, mechanical engineering, and related areas. LARS/SBR 2016 can be considered the most important Latin American robotics symposium. LARS/SBR 2016 was the major scientific/academic event of Robotica 2016. There were some co-located events: the 15th Latin American Robotics Competition (LARC 2016), 14th Brazilian Robotics Competition (CBR 2016—14th Competição Brasileira de Robótica), Brazilian Robotics Olympiad (OBR 2016—Olimpíada Brasileira de Robótica), Mostra Nacional de Robótica (MNR 2016), 7th Workshop of Robotics in Education (WRE 2016), and Workshop on Thesis and Dissertations (WTDR 2016). These events were the result of a joint action of the Brazilian Computer Society (SBC), the IEEE Latin American Robotics Council, and the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society Chapter of Brazil. The joint conferences were held October 8–12, 2016, in Recife, PE, Brazil. The papers accepted for presentation at the symposium covered a large spectrum of topics, including active sensory processing and control; aerial vehicles; autonomous vehicles; bio- inspired robotics; CAD-based robotics; computing architectures; education issues in robotics; human/robot interaction;
    [Show full text]
  • Change and Technology in the United States
    Change and Technology in the United States A Resource Book for Studying the Geography and History of Technology Stephen Petrina Including: 12 Printable Maps Showing 700+ Inventions from 1787-1987 279 Technological Events 32 Graphs and Tables of Historical Trends 5 Timelines of Innovation and Labor with Pictures Plus: 3 Tables for Cross-Referencing Standards 50 Links to WWW Resources and Portals 50+ Resource Articles, CDs, Books & Videos Change and Technology in the United States A Resource Book for Studying the Geography and History of Technology Dr. Stephen Petrina Copyright © 2004 by Stephen Petrina Creative Commons License Copies of this document are distributed by: Council on Technology Teacher Education (http://teched.vt.edu/ctte/HTML/Research1.html) International Technology Education Association 1914 Association Drive, Suite 201 Reston, VA 20191-1531 Phone (703) 860-2100 Fax (703) 860-0353 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.iteaconnect.org Note: Cover illustration— "Building New York City's Subway"— is from Scientific American 15 July 1915. Wright Plane Drawing reproduction courtesy of the National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution. Change and Technology in the United States Preface This project is the result of a project undertaken in my graduate program at the University of Maryland during the late 1980s. When I began, I did not fully realize the scale of the challenge. The research itself was extremely intimidating and time-consuming. It took me a few years to figure out what resources were most helpful in integrating the geography and history of technology. I completed eights maps in 1987 and did a fair amount of writing at the same time.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inchworm-Inspired Motion Strategy for Robotic Swarms
    This article has been published in a revised form in Robotica [https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S0263574721000321]. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © Cambridge University Press. An Inchworm-Inspired Motion Strategy for Robotic Swarms Kasra Eshaghi*ψ, Zendai Kashinoψ, Hyun Joong Yoonϕ, Goldie Nejatψ, Beno Benhabibψ ψ Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King’s College Road, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G8, Canada. Φ School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Daegu Catholic University, Hayang, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 712-702, Republic of Korea E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (Accepted __, First published online: __) SUMMARY Effective motion planning and localization are necessary tasks for swarm robotic systems to maintain a desired formation while maneuvering. Herein, we present an inchworm-inspired strategy that addresses both these tasks concurrently by using anchor robots. The proposed strategy is novel as, by dynamically and optimally selecting the anchor robots, it allows the swarm to maximize its localization performance while also considering secondary objectives, such as the swarm’s speed. A complementary novel method for swarm localization, that fuses inter-robot proximity measurements and motion commands, is also presented. Numerous simulated and physical experimental examples are included to illustrate
    [Show full text]
  • Mixed Reality Technologies for Novel Forms of Human-Robot Interaction
    Dissertation Mixed Reality Technologies for Novel Forms of Human-Robot Interaction Dissertation with the aim of achieving a doctoral degree at the Faculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Natural Sciences Dipl.-Inf. Dennis Krupke Human-Computer Interaction and Technical Aspects of Multimodal Systems Department of Informatics Universität Hamburg November 2019 Review Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Frank Steinicke Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Jianwei Zhang Drittgutachter: Prof. Dr. Eva Bittner Vorsitzende der Prüfungskomission: Prof. Dr. Simone Frintrop Datum der Disputation: 17.08.2020 “ My dear Miss Glory, Robots are not people. They are mechanically more perfect than we are, they have an astounding intellectual capacity, but they have no soul.” Karel Capek Abstract Nowadays, robot technology surrounds us and future developments will further increase the frequency of our everyday contacts with robots in our daily life. To enable this, the current forms of human-robot interaction need to evolve. The concept of digital twins seems promising for establishing novel forms of cooperation and communication with robots and for modeling system states. Machine learning is now ready to be applied to a multitude of domains. It has the potential to enhance artificial systems with capabilities, which so far are found in natural intelligent creatures, only. Mixed reality experienced a substantial technological evolution in recent years and future developments of mixed reality devices seem to be promising, as well. Wireless networks will improve significantly in the next years and thus, latency and bandwidth limitations will be no crucial issue anymore. Based on the ongoing technological progress, novel interaction and communication forms with robots become available and their application to real-world scenarios becomes feasible.
    [Show full text]