DOCSLIB.ORG

Tern Verification Surveys for Marine Sites

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tern Verification Surveys for Marine Sites Natural England Commissioned Report NECR212 Tern verification surveys for marine sites First published 20 May 2016 www.gov.uk/natural -england Foreword Natural England commission a range of reports from external contractors to provide evidence and advice to assist us in delivering our duties. The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. Background Five species of tern that breed in the UK are listed on • Consider individually other types of SPAs, including Annex 1 of the EU Birds Directives and require important marine areas around colonies of special protection: breeding terns. • Sandwich Tern Thalasseus sandvicensis; Natural England commissioned these surveys to • Common Tern Sterna hirundo; verify modelling work on terns carried out by the JNCC. The results will be used to help define the • Arctic Tern S. paradisaea; potential boundaries of marine SPAs by identifing the • Roseate Tern S. dougallii; and limits to important foraging areas for each species at • Little Tern Sternula albifrons. each recently regularly occupied colony. Current Special Protection Areas (SPAs) protect This report should be cited as: breeding seabird colonies, but do not extend to foraging areas. Only three of the UK’s 110 SPAs with PERROW, M.R., HARWOOD, A.J.P. & CALDOW, marine components encompass entirely marine R.W.G. 2016. Tern verification surveys for marine habitats occupied by seabirds. sites. Natural England Commissioned Reports, Number212. To fulfil commitments to the global Convention on Biological Diversity and contribute to measures required under the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive, the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC), working with the national statutory bodies including Natural England, aims to: • Increase the area and number of marine SPAs by extending existing marine bird breeding colony/site SPAs. • Identify important inshore areas used by waterbirds outside the breeding season. • Identify important offshore areas used by marine birds. Natural England Project Manager - Alice Kimpton, Senior Advisor, Natural England, Mail Hub, County Hall, Spetchley Road, Worcester, WR5 2NP [email protected] Contractor - Dr Martin Perrow, Econ Ecological Consultancy Ltd, Unit 7, The Octagon Business Park, Little Plumstead, Norwich, Norfolk, NR13 5FH Keywords - marine SPA, Special Protection Area (SPA), Tern, survey 2015, model verification, site designation Further information This report can be downloaded from the Natural England website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/natural-england. For information on Natural England publications contact the Natural England Enquiry Service on 0845 600 3078 or e-mail [email protected]. This report is published by Natural England under the Open Government Licence - OGLv3.0 for public sector information. You are encouraged to use, and reuse, information subject to certain conditions. For details of the licence visit Copyright. Natural England photographs are only available for non commercial purposes. If any other information such as maps or data cannot be used commercially this will be made clear within the report. ISBN 978-1-78354-315-1 © Natural England and other parties 2016 Tern verification surveys for marine sites © Martin Perrow Common Tern above the River Tees ECON Ecological Consultancy Limited Unit 7, The Octagon Business Park, Little Plumstead, Norwich, Norfolk NR13 5FH Registered in England & Wales Company No. 6457758. Director: Dr Martin Perrow BSc, PhD, MIEEM, MIFM, CEnv C0mpany Secretary: Eleanor Skeate BSc 1 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 4 2 Aims & objectives ....................................................................................... 5 3 Study sites & survey locations .................................................................... 6 3.1 Hamford Water ....................................................................................................... 6 3.1.1 Background information .......................................................................... 6 3.1.2 Survey locations ........................................................................................7 3.2 Teesmouth & Cleveland Coast ................................................................................. 8 3.2.1 Background information .......................................................................... 8 3.2.2 Survey locations ....................................................................................... 9 3.3 Northumberland .................................................................................................... 11 3.3.1 Background information ......................................................................... 11 3.3.2 Survey locations ...................................................................................... 12 3.4 Morecambe Bay & Duddon Estuary ....................................................................... 16 3.4.1 Background information ......................................................................... 16 3.4.2 Survey locations ...................................................................................... 16 3.5 Liverpool Bay ..........................................................................................................18 3.5.1 Background information ......................................................................... 18 3.5.2 Survey locations ......................................................................................18 3.6 Solent & Dorset Coast ............................................................................................ 20 3.6.1 Background information ........................................................................ 20 3.6.2 Survey locations ...................................................................................... 21 4 Methods ................................................................................................... 22 4.1 Timing of surveys .................................................................................................. 22 4.2 Shore-based observations ..................................................................................... 23 4.2.1 Basic methodology .................................................................................. 23 4.2.2 Timed counts ........................................................................................... 24 4.2.3 Snapshots ................................................................................................ 26 4.3 Boat-based observations ....................................................................................... 27 4.3.1 Basic methodology .................................................................................. 27 4.3.2 Timed counts ........................................................................................... 29 4.3.3 Snapshots ................................................................................................ 30 4.3.4 Transect surveys ..................................................................................... 30 4.4 Data analysis .......................................................................................................... 31 4.4.1 Derivation of boundaries to be validated ............................................... 31 4.4.2 Comparison of survey data with the proposed boundaries .................. 32 5 Results & discussion ................................................................................. 34 5.1 Hamford Water ..................................................................................................... 34 5.1.1 Spatio-temporal abundance ................................................................... 34 5.1.2 Patterns of activity ................................................................................. 34 5.1.3 Comparison with the proposed SPA ...................................................... 36 5.2 Teesmouth & Cleveland Coast ............................................................................... 39 5.2.1 Spatio-temporal abundance ................................................................... 39 2 5.2.2 Patterns of activity ................................................................................. 40 5.2.3 Comparison with the proposed SPA ...................................................... 42 5.3 Northumberland .................................................................................................... 51 5.3.1 Spatio-temporal abundance .................................................................... 51 5.3.2 Patterns of activity ................................................................................. 55 5.3.3 Comparison with the proposed SPA ...................................................... 55 5.4 Morecambe Bay & Duddon Estuary ...................................................................... 60 5.4.1 Spatio-temporal abundance ................................................................... 60 5.4.2 Patterns of activity .................................................................................. 61 5.4.3 Comparison with the proposed SPA ....................................................... 61 5.5 Liverpool Bay ......................................................................................................... 62 5.5.1 Spatio-temporal abundance ..................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tourism Benefit & Impacts Analysis in the Norfolk Coast Area Of
    TOURISM BENEFIT & IMPACTS ANALYSIS IN THE NORFOLK COAST AREA OF OUTSTANDING NATURAL BEAUTY APPENDICES May 2006 A Report for the Norfolk Coast Partnership Prepared by Scott Wilson NORFOLK COAST PARTNERSHIP TOURISM BENEFIT & IMPACTS ANALYSIS IN THE NORFOLK COAST AREA OF OUTSTANDING NATURAL BEAUTY APPENDICES May 2006 Prepared by Checked by Authorised by Scott Wilson Ltd 3 Foxcombe Court, Wyndyke Furlong, Abingdon Business Park, Abingdon Oxon, OX14 1DZ Tel: +44 (0) 1235 468700 Fax: +44 (0) 1235 468701 Norfolk Coast Partnership Tourism Benefit & Impacts Analysis in the Norfolk Coast AONB Scott Wilson Contents 1 A1 - Norfolk Coast Management ...............................................................1 2 A2 – Asset & Appeal Audit ......................................................................12 3 A3 - Tourism Plant Audit..........................................................................25 4 A4 - Market Context.................................................................................34 5 A5 - Economic Impact Assessment Calculations ....................................46 Norfolk Coast Partnership Tourism Benefit & Impacts Analysis in the Norfolk Coast AONB Scott Wilson Norfolk Coast AONB Tourism Impact Analysis – Appendices 1 A1 - Norfolk Coast Management 1.1 A key aspect of the Norfolk Coast is the array of authority, management and access organisations that actively participate, through one means or another, in the use and maintenance of the Norfolk Coast AONB, particularly its more fragile sites. 1.2 The aim of the
    [Show full text]
  • North Norfolk Coastal Landscape
    What is the landscape like? Geomorphic processes on the landscape Underlying chalk with some flint deposits known Blakeney and Wells-next-to-Sea were flooded in January 2013 by a coastal storm surge. The low lying as drift from the Ice Age land makes them vulnerable. Glacial deposits of weak boulder clay is easily Sea level rises are leading to Stiffkey salt marsh to build making a natural sea defence eroded Coastal flooding from storm surges or high tides can cause sand dunes areas to disappear over night, Low lying coastline, the boundary between land such as at Wells-next-to-Sea in January 2013 and sea is not clear, with spits and salt marshes formed North Norfolk Wide, sandy beach backed by sand dunes at Holkham- shallow seabed so the tide goes out a Coastal long way allowing sand to dry out and be blown onshore Landscape Low cliffs at Hunstanton, Sheringham and Cromer- Why protect the coastline? harder chalk outcrops protrude from the land Spit at Blakeney point- area of deposition Entire village including Shipden and Keswick have been completely lost to the sea in the last century Salt marsh at Stiffkey- permanent feature Happisburgh is currently disappearing due to cliff retreat. People have lost their homes and are still Human Sea Defences battling to receive compensation for their losses. Sea Palling has been protected by a sea wall which has reduced transportation and created a wide Rip-rap barriers at Sheringham- large rocks placed in beach which provides a natural sea defence front of cliffs to dissipate wave
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Seabird Demographic Rates and Density Dependence
    JNCC Report No: 552 Review of Seabird Demographic Rates and Density Dependence Catharine Horswill1 & Robert A. Robinson1 February 2015 © JNCC, Peterborough 2015 1British Trust for Ornithology ISSN 0963 8901 For further information please contact: Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY http://jncc.defra.gov.uk This report should be cited as: Horswill, C. & Robinson R. A. 2015. Review of seabird demographic rates and density dependence. JNCC Report No. 552. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough. Review of Seabird Demographic Rates and Density Dependence Summary Constructing realistic population models is the first step towards reliably assessing how infrastructure developments, such as offshore wind farms, impact the population trends of different species. The construction of these models requires the individual demographic processes that influence the size of a population to be well understood. However, it is currently unclear how many UK seabird species have sufficient data to support the development of species-specific models. Density-dependent regulation of demographic rates has been documented in a number of different seabird species. However, the majority of the population models used to assess the potential impacts of wind farms do not consider it. Models that incorporate such effects are more complex, and there is also a lack of clear expectation as to what form such regulation might take. We surveyed the published literature in order to collate available estimates of seabird and sea duck demographic rates. Where sufficient data could not be gathered using UK examples, data from colonies outside of the UK or proxy species are presented. We assessed each estimate’s quality and representativeness.
    [Show full text]
  • Morston, Blakeney and Cley Classic North Norfolk
    Directions... The bus ride From the Bittern Line rail station When you arrive in Morston At the National Trail finger post At Blakeney, walk along the Take a trip to see the seals at Follow the sea bank and the After crossing the River The bus ride Leaving Blakeney the bus climbs This walk of approximately 4 miles, taking at Sheringham walk across the alight from the Coasthopper turn right along the top of the quay to opposite the toilets. Blakeney Point, watch bait acorn out and round to Cley. Glaven descend the steps The Coasthopper bus provides up and over the Blakeney esker. road and into Station Approach and walk past The Anchor sea defence bank. You are now Here you will see another diggers on the mud flats or terns If you find steps difficult you into Cley village. a great platform to get a good A great view point from where around two hours to complete, takes you to the to the Coasthopper stop outside pub and take the next right on the Norfolk Coast Path National Trail finger post on the windswept shingle. will need to leave the path at view of the Norfolk coastline. you fleetingly get good views edge of the land and the sea. A special place. Explore the village of Cley, a the tourist information centre. signed Morston Quay. Keep National Trail, which runs from pointing out along the sea Cley where it reaches the main across Morston to Wells. Find out more about Blakeney mecca for birdwatchers with a Look out for views of the coast, Catch the bus to Morston.
    [Show full text]
  • Blakeney Point 2011 Bird Report
    Blakeney Point Bird Report, 2011 Mediterranean Gull Larus melanocephalus in main colony (Richard Berridge) Edward Stubbings, National Trust Coastal Warden Breeding birds Table Species Common No. of No. of Comments name breeding young pairs fledged Tadorna tadorna Common 32-44 Not fully Shelduck surveyed but 1 thought to be usual numbers Anas strepera Gadwall 2 No nests or young found Anus clypeata Shoveler 3 No nests or young found Anas Mallard platyrhynchos platyrhynchos Alectoris rufa Red-legged Partridge Perdix perdix Grey Partridge 3+ 45+ birds seen in September Phasianus Common colchicus Pheasant Haematopus Oystercatcher 110 Fledging success ostralegus thought to be good Recurvirostra Avocet 7 All nests failed avocetta Charadrius Ringed Plover 17 Fledging success hiaticula thought to be moderate Vanellus vanellus Lapwing ? Tringa totanus Common 14+ Several nests Redshank found but only a few young seen Chroicocephalus Black-headed 1807+ Fledging success ridibundus Gull thought to be good Larus Mediterranean c.10 c.27 6+ nests found melanocephalus Gull during Sandwich Tern nest count Larus canus Common Gull Sternula albifrons Little Tern 160 140 Sterna Sandwich Tern 3562 1700-2000 Nest count sandvicensis conducted on the 29th of May Sterna hirundo Common Tern 92+ c.70 Sterna paradisaea Arctic Tern 7 5 Columba oenas Stock Dove 1 Columba Wood pigeon 1+ 2 nests failed palumbus Alauda arvensis Skylark 32 Some young seen Hirundo rustica Barn Swallow 7 Anthus pratensis Meadow pipit 102 2+ broods, many young seen Motacilla alba Pied Wagtail
    [Show full text]
  • 3, Point View, Blakeney
    3, Point View, Blakeney VIEW FROM REAR 3, Point View, Morston Road, Blakeney, Norfolk NR25 7AT Holt 5 miles, Burnham Market 13 miles, Norwich 27 miles An exquisitely appointed coastal home, quietly tucked away, literally a stone’s throw from the High Street and with direct access to the North Norfolk Coastal path. The property also enjoys uninterrupted views to the rear aspect from the first and second floors over Blakeney marshes, to Blakeney Pit and Blakeney Point beyond. GUIDE PRICE £499,950 The Property A superbly appointed coastal residence tucked away in an enviable location being just a stone’s throw from the High Street and with direct Accommodation access to the marshes and the North Norfolk coastal path. Currently a highly successful holiday let, the property would also make a comfortable The accommodation comprises: coastal retreat or main residence. Constructed by Swann homes in 2013 from traditional local materials, the skilfully designed accommodation Front door, leading to - comprises a porch, entrance hall leading to a light and airy sitting room with double doors leading to a conservatory overlooking the rear garden, an extremely well fitted out kitchen/breakfast room and a cloakroom. On Entrance Porch the first floor, a landing leads to two double bedrooms and a bathroom. On Tiled floor, fitted coat pegs and shelving. the second floor is a third bedroom and an en-suite. The property also enjoys sealed unit double glazing and air source heat pump central Entrance Hall heating. Outside, there are well tended gardens to the front and rear of Karndean flooring, alarm panel, staircase to first floor.
    [Show full text]
  • ( 279 ) Ornithological Notes from Norfolk for 1924. In
    ( 279 ) ORNITHOLOGICAL NOTES FROM NORFOLK FOR 1924. BY B. B. RIVIERK, F.R.C.S., F.Z.S., M.B.O.U. IN presenting my report on the Ornithology of Norfolk for the year 1924, I again acknowledge with grateful thanks the valuable assistance I have received from a number of correspondents who have sent me notes. I have also to record, with very deep sorrow, the loss of two most valued contributors to these notes in the Rev. Maurice C. H. Bird of Brunstead, who died on October 18th, 1924, in his sixty- eighth year, and in Mr. H. N. Pashley of Cley, who died on January 30th, 1925, in his eighty-first year. The past year was chiefly notable for the extraordinary number of wild fowl which visited our coasts during January and February, and for the record bags of Woodcock which continued to be made up to the end of the 1923-24 shooting season. Of these two remarkable immigrations I have already written elsewhere (Trans. Norf. <& Norwich Nat. Soc, Vol. XL, pt. v., 1923-24), so that I shall only refer to them more briefly in these notes. The winter of 1923-24, which was a long and bitterly cold one, may be said to have begun at the end of the first week of November, and lasted well into March. The first two weeks of January were marked by frosts and blizzards, a particularly severe blizzard from the S.E. occurring on the night of the 8th, whilst from February -12th until the end of the month snow fell nearly every day, the thermometer on February 29th registering 120 of frost, and another heavy snowfall occurring on March 3rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Blakeney, Norfolk
    EC Regulation 854/2004 CLASSIFICATION OF BIVALVE MOLLUSC PRODUCTION AREAS IN ENGLAND AND WALES SANITARY SURVEY REPORT Blakeney (Norfolk) 2010 SANITARY SURVEY REPORT BLAKENEY Cover photo: Wells-next-the-Sea Channel. CONTACTS: For enquires relating to this report or For enquires relating to policy matters on further information on the the implementation of sanitary surveys in implementation of sanitary surveys in England and Wales: England and Wales: Simon Kershaw/Carlos Campos Mariam Aleem Food Safety Group Hygiene Delivery Branch Cefas Weymouth Laboratory Food Standards Agency Barrack Road, Enforcement and Delivery Division The Nothe Aviation House Weymouth 125 Kingsway Dorset London DT43 8UB WC2B 6NH +44 (0) 1305 206600 +44 (0) 20 7276 8955 [email protected] [email protected] © Crown copyright, 2010. Overall Review of Production Area 2 SANITARY SURVEY REPORT BLAKENEY STATEMENT OF USE: This report provides information from a study of the information available relevant to perform a sanitary survey of bivalve mollusc production areas in Blakeney (Norfolk). Its primary purpose is to demonstrate compliance with the requirements for classification of bivalve mollusc production areas, as determined in EC Regulation 854/2004 laying down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption. The Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (Cefas) undertook this work on behalf of the Food Standards Agency (FSA). DISSEMINATION STATUS: Food Standards Agency, Environment Agency, North Norfolk District Council, Eastern Sea Fisheries Joint Committee. RECOMMENDED BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE: Cefas, 2010. Sanitary Survey of Blakeney (Norfolk). Cefas report on behalf of the Food Standards Agency, to demonstrate compliance with the requirements for classification of bivalve mollusc production areas in England and Wales under Regulation (EC) No.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation of Blakeney Point Source: Journal of Ecology, Vol
    Review: Vegetation of Blakeney Point Source: Journal of Ecology, Vol. 1, No. 4 (Dec., 1913), p. 297 Published by: British Ecological Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2255576 Accessed: 26-06-2016 08:33 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Wiley, British Ecological Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Ecology This content downloaded from 157.89.65.129 on Sun, 26 Jun 2016 08:33:24 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY VOL. 1, PLATE 24 4)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 4-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- b4 0~~~~~~~~~~c b0 1-4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- Cd~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. Cn~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0~~~~~~~~C t | ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~biD | -| 0 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C :rE, :|_I C 1-l C o) (L) CE f I vd m = _ | Q 4 00- 4-4 ....... I . .l .. .. ... .. ... * ;............. 9e ........................... U) X z 4) C)d b,o . :3 * 4) . ^ > 0-o This content downloaded from 157.89.65.129 on Sun, 26 Jun 2016 08:33:24 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 297 NOTICES OF WORK ON BRiTISH VEGETATION VEGETATION OF BLAKENEY POINT Oliver, F. W., and Salisbury, E. J. "Topography and vegetation of Blakeney Point, Norfolk." London (F.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Area Guide
    Thornham - Local Area Guide Situated in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty roughly halfway between the popular seaside town of Hunstanton and the picturesque Burnhams, The Lifeboat Inn at Thornham is the perfect spot from which to explore the subtle beauty of the North Norfolk coastline. Whether you’re drawn here for the wonderful wildlife, attracted by the numerous walks, tempted by the sweeping beaches and desolate marshy landscapes, keen to indulge in local food and drink, or pursuing your favourite sport and leisure activities, there’s plenty here to keep you entertained. Here’s our pick of things to do in Thornham and the surrounding area. Villages & Towns The village of Thornham, once a prosperous harbour and smugglers’ haunt, is today a small coastal village separated from the sea by its atmospheric marshes. Home to the Lifeboat Inn and our sister pub-restaurant, The Chequers Inn, it’s a magnet for walkers, birdwatchers, artists and photographers with its characteristic landscape of salt water inlets and marshes. This stunning stretch of coastline starts at nearby Hunstanton, a family- friendly seaside resort complete with funfair, amusements, a long promenade and its famous stripy cliffs. Along the coast road in the opposite direction you’ll find The Burnhams, a group of seven small villages clustered around the River Burn, including Burnham Thorpe, childhood home to Lord Nelson, and Burnham Market, Norfolk’s answer to Chelsea-on-Sea. The historic fishing town of Wells-next-the-Sea is a charming destination where children hang crabbing lines over the jetty next to visiting yachts and a narrow-gauge railway ferries people between the harbour and the long sweeping beach, which is fringed with stripy beach huts and backed by cool pinewoods.
    [Show full text]
  • The Norfolk & Norwich
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE NORFOLK & NORWICH NATURALISTS' SOCIETY VOL. XXIII 1974 - 1976 LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS Page Allard, P. R. 29 Banham, P. R. 145 Buckley, J 86,172 Funnell, B.M 251 Gosling, L. M 49 Gurney, C Ill Harding, P. T 267 Harrison, R. H 45 Hornby, R 231 Ismay, J 231, 271 Kington, J. A. 140 Lambley, P. W 170, 231, 269, 270 Norgate, T. B 167 Oliver, J 120 Peet, T. N.D 156,249 Ramsay, H. R. 28 Watts, G. D 231 Williams, R. B 257 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (Plates adjoin pages indicated) Bat, Long-eared 60 Bearded Tit 95 Bewick's Swan ••• 103 Black-bellied Dipper ... ... ... ••• ••• ••• ••• 44 Black-headed Gull 29 Black-tailed Godwit ... ... ... ••• ••• ••• ••• 87 Common Tern ••• 94 Curlew ••• 216 Deer, Roe 61 Page Green Sandpiper ... ... ... 216 Hawfinch 79 Heron Hortus Sanitatus, figures from 117 Kingfisher 200 Knot 28 Lapwing 102 Little Egret 12 Little Ringed Plover ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 29 Osprey 102 Pied Flycatcher 44 217 Pyiausta peilucidalis 249 Red-breasted Flycatcher ... ... 44 Salt Pans 150-151 Sandwich Tern 28,201 Short-eared Owl ... ... ... ... ... 45 Snipe 200 Sparrowhawk 44 Squirrel, Grey 60 Water-rail 13 Waxwing 78,201 Weather Maps, Europe, 1784 143- 144 White-fronted Goose 45 Wryneck 217 Yare Valley 247 - 249 INDEX TO VOLUME XXIII Amphibia and Reptile Records for Norfolk ... ... 172 Barton Broad, Bird Report ... ... ... ... 5 Bird Report, Classified Notes 1972 30 1973 96 1974 202 Bird Report, Editorial 1972 2 1973 71 1974 194 Bird Ringing Recoveries 22, 92, 197 Birds and the Weather of 1784 140 Blakeney Point, Bird Report 5 Breydon Water, Bird Report ..
    [Show full text]
  • Seabird Numbers and Breeding Success in Britain and Ireland, 2004
    UK Nature Conservation No. 29 Seabird numbers and breeding success in Britain and Ireland, 2004 R.A. Mavor, M. Parsons, M. Heubeck and S. Schmitt Roddy Mavor and Matt Parsons, Seabirds and Cetaceans, Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Dunnet House, 7 Thistle Place, Aberdeen, AB10 1UZ Martin Heubeck, Shetland Oil Terminal Environmental Advisory Group, Department of Zoology, University of Aberdeen, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, AB9 2TN Sabine Schmitt, Research Department, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire, SG19 2DL Cover painting of black-legged kittiwakes by David Bennett. Cover design by Green Associates, 1994. Further information on JNCC publications can be obtained from: JNCC, Monkstone House, City Road, Peterborough PE1 1JY Published by Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough Copyright: Joint Nature Conservation Committee 2005 ISBN 1 86107 569 3 ISSN 0963 8083 Seabird numbers and breeding success, 2004 This report should be cited as follows: Mavor, R.A., Parsons, M., Heubeck, M. and Schmitt, S. 2005. Seabird numbers and breeding success in Britain and Ireland, 2004. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee. (UK Nature Conservation, No. 29.) Original data from the report may not be used in other publications (although general results and conclusions may be cited) without permission of JNCC, RSPB and/or SOTEAG, as relevant. Requests to use data should be channelled through S. Schmitt/RSPB (petrels, terns and skuas), M. Heubeck/SOTEAG (cliff-breeding species and black guillemots
    [Show full text]