DOCSLIB.ORG

Preserving a Critical National Asset

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preserving a Critical National Asset Preserving a Critical National Asset America’s Disadvantaged Students and the Crisis in Faith-based Urban Schools The White House Domestic Policy Council The nonpublic school situation: enrollments are falling and costs are climbing…If decline continues, pluralism in education will cease, parental options will virtually terminate, and public schools will have to absorb millions of American students. The greatest impact will be on…large urban centers, with especially grievous consequences for poor and lower middle-class families in racially changing neighborhoods where the nearby nonpublic school is an indispensable stabilizing factor. —President’s Panel on Nonpublic Education April 14, 1972 America’s inner-city faith-based schools are facing a crisis. And I use the word “crisis” for this reason: Between 2000 and 2006, nearly 1,200 faith-based schools closed in America’s inner cities. It’s affected nearly 400,000 students…We have an interest in the health of these centers of excellence; it’s in the country’s interest to get beyond the debate of public/ private, to recognize this is a critical national asset. —President George W. Bush April 24, 2008 Preserving a Critical National Asset America’s Disadvantaged Students and the Crisis in Faith-based Urban Schools The White House Domestic Policy Council September 2008 U.S. Department of Education Margaret Spellings Secretary September 2008 This report is in the public domain. Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part is granted. While permission to reprint this publication is not necessary, the citation should be: U.S. Department of Education, Preserving a Critical National Asset: America’s Disadvantaged Students and the Crisis in Faith-based Urban Schools, Washington, D.C., 2008. This report is also on the Department’s Web site at www.ed.gov/admins/comm/choice/faithbased/. On request, this publication is available in alternate formats, such as Braille, large print or computer diskette. For more information, please contact the Department’s Alternate Format Center at 202-260-0852 or 202-260-0818. Contents LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS v INTRODUCTION 1 PART I: THE CHALLENGE 3 FAITH-BASED SCHOOLS IN AMERICA 5 ACADEMIC BENEFITS OF FAITH-BASED SCHOOLS 6 THE LOSS OF URBAN FAITH-BASED SCHOOLS 8 THE STRUGGLE OF URBAN EDUCATION 13 ATTEMPTS AT REFORM 15 CAUSES OF THE CRISIS 17 PART II: SOLUTIONS 23 JOINT RESPONSIBILITY 25 NETWORKS 26 PHILANTHROPY 28 Improving and Publicizing School Quality 29 Standardized Assessments: 29 Alternative Measures: 29 Improvement Strategies: 30 Distributing Information: 30 Engaging Faith-based Communities 31 Focusing Geographically 31 Focusing on Programs 32 HIGHER EDUCATION 32 Preparing Teachers and Principals 33 Supporting Schools 33 NEW SUPPORT SYSTEMS 34 Building Human Capital 34 Creating New Schools and Replicating Successful Schools 35 PUBLIC POLICY 36 Scholarships 36 Student-centered Funding 38 Tax Credits 39 Faith-based Charter Schools 40 Additional Support 41 NOTES 43 iii APPENDIX 59 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS 61 EDITED AND CORRECTED TRANSCRIPTS 63 Opening Presentation 63 KARL ZINSMEISTER 63 Panel I: Faith-based Schools and the Common Good 73 KARL ZINSMEISTER 73 CHARLES GLENN 74 JOSEPH VITERITTI 76 WILLIAM JEYNES 78 REVEREND FLOYD FLAKE 82 QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION 84 Speech by President George W. Bush 87 AYSIA MAYO-GRAY 87 THE PRESIDENT 87 Panel II: Practical Realities on the Ground 94 JAY HEIN 94 PHYLICIA LYONS 95 REVEREND JOSEPH O’KEEFE 97 VERNARD GANT 100 VIRGINIA WALDEN-FORD 102 CONCLUSION 104 Lunch Plenary: Education Options and America’s Cities 105 SECRETARY MARGARET SPELLINGS 105 ACTING SECRETARY ROY BERNARDI 105 HONORABLE STEVE GOLDSMITH 107 HONORABLE NANCY GRASMICK 108 QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION 109 Panel III: Community Solutions 116 SCOTT HAMILTON 116 MARY MCDONALD 117 TOM TILLAPAUGH 121 B.J CASSIN 124 REVEREND TIMOTHY SCULLY 127 RABBI DAVID ZWIEBEL 130 QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION 132 Panel IV: Public Policy Options 134 DEPUTY SECRETARY RAY SIMON 134 ANTHONY PICARELLO 136 HONORABLE ANTHONY WILLIAMS 139 RONALD BOWES 141 LAWRENCE WEINBERG 144 APPENDIX NOTES 147 MODERATOR AND SPEAKER BIOGRAPHIES 151 iv Illustrations Figures 1. K–12 Schools by Type of School: 2005–06 5 2. Number of U.S. Catholic Schools: 1960–2008 8 3. A Warning Unheeded: The 1972 Report of the President’s Panel on Nonpublic Education 9 4. Loss of Catholic Schools: 1998–2008 10 5. Number of Faith-based Urban Schools: 1990, 2000, and 2006 12 6. Number of Faith-based Non-urban Schools: 2000 and 2006 12 7. Number of Secular Private Schools: 2000 and 2006 13 8. Percentage of Students At or Above Proficient on the NAEP 8th-Grade Reading Assessment, by Selected Cities: 2007 13 9. Public High School Graduation Rates, by Selected Cities: 2003–04 14 10. Median Highest Annual Tuition in Central City Private Schools, by Type: 2003–04 19 11. Percentage of Religious and Lay Staff at Catholic Schools: 1920 and 2007 20 Tables 1. Cumulative Change in Numbers of Faith-based Urban Schools and Their Students: 2000–06 11 v Introduction On April 24, 2008, President George W. Bush convened in Washington, D.C., a broad array of education and community stakeholders to address a deeply troubling but vastly under-reported phenomenon limiting the education options available to low-income urban families: the rapid disappearance of faith-based schools in America’s cities. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, between the 1999–2000 and 2005–06 school years, the K–12 faith-based education sector lost nearly 1,200 schools and nearly 425,000 students. This is a cause for national concern for a number of important reasons. First, for generations, these schools have played an invaluable role in America’s cities. They are part of our Nation’s proud story of religious freedom and tolerance, community development, immigration and assimilation, academic achievement, upward mobility, and more. To lose these schools is to lose a positive, central character in the narrative of urban America. More importantly, the disappearance of these schools is having a tragic impact on many of our most disadvantaged families. For many urban parents, the moral grounding, community ethic, safe and structured environment, and academic rigor of faith-based schools are invaluable to their children. These qualities are especially prized because of the unfortunate alternatives many of these children and families face. The struggles of urban public schools are well known and long-standing. The underserved children of America’s cities deserve access to high-performing educational options. The disappearance of urban faith-based schools— with their strong record of serving the disadvantaged—frustrates the crucial national effort to make educational excellence available to every child. Experience indicates that the contributions of these schools extend far beyond the classroom. A strong education institution can stabilize a community. It can attract new families and jobs. It can provide safety and hope in areas where both are in short supply. Regrettably, the inverse is also true. In addition to hurting students, the loss of a strong school in an underserved community can destabilize fragile social networks, depress job creation and economic development, and exacerbate the collective sense of despair resulting from scarce community resources and opportunities. As serious and worrisome as this problem is, there is no villain in the story. No one purposely set about to cause an education crisis. The root causes are several and diffuse—including barriers to government aid, demographic shifts, and staffing changes—and they only begin to corrode urban faith-based schools when combined. However, these factors have, in the end, chipped away at a pillar of American K–12 education. To leave this grave and mounting challenge unaddressed would be irresponsible. The futures of too many young lives and distressed communities are at stake. Fortunately, this problem is solvable. America’s institutions—from the Federal, State, and local governments to businesses and non-profits to universities and community-based organizations—have it in their power to turn the tide. This Administration has taken the lead, raising the public awareness of this crisis through the White House Summit on Inner-City Children and Faith-Based Schools and developing and supporting promising initiatives, including Promise Scholarships, Opportunity Scholarships, Pell Grants for Kids, and the Washington, D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program. However, if we are to succeed in protecting these valuable education options, more must be done. A sustained collaborative effort by educators, elected officials, philanthropists, neighborhood leaders, and many others will be required. America’s faith-based urban schools—so prized by so many families—are well worth this effort. Their preservation will greatly benefit countless disadvantaged students, numerous underserved communities, and as a result, our Nation at large. PART I: The Challenge Faith-based Schools in America The United States has a long, proud tradition of faith-based K–12 education. Long before the Declaration of Independence proclaimed America’s emergence and the Constitution guaranteed all citizens religious freedom, faith-based schools were proliferating on these shores. In 1606, the Franciscan Order founded the first Catholic school in St. Augustine, Florida.1 In 1727, the Sisters of Saint Ursula founded the Ursuline Academy for girls in New Orleans, which is still operating today and is the oldest Catholic school in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Destructive Discourse
    Destructive Discourse ‘Japan-bashing’ in the United States, Australia and Japan in the 1980s and 1990s This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Murdoch University 2006 Narrelle Morris (LLB, BAsian St., BA (Hons), Murdoch University) I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. ...................... ABSTRACT By the 1960s-70s, most Western commentators agreed that Japan had rehabilitated itself from World War II, in the process becoming on the whole a reliable member of the international community. From the late 1970s onwards, however, as Japan’s economy continued to rise, this premise began to be questioned. By the late 1980s, a new ‘Japan Problem’ had been identified in Western countries, although the presentation of Japan as a dangerous ‘other’ was nevertheless familiar from past historical eras. The term ‘Japan-bashing’ was used by opponents of this negative view to suggest that much of the critical rhetoric about a ‘Japan Problem’ could be reduced to an unwarranted, probably racist, assault on Japan. This thesis argues that the invention and popularisation of the highly-contested label ‘Japan-bashing’, rather than averting criticism of Japan, perversely helped to exacerbate and transform the moderate anti-Japanese sentiment that had existed in Western countries in the late 1970s and early 1980s into a widely disseminated, heavily politicised and even encultured phenomenon in the late 1980s and 1990s. Moreover, when the term ‘Japan-bashing’ spread to Japan itself, Japanese commentators were quick to respond.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Emily Jo Wharry HIST 490 Dec. 10, 2019 Student Club to Supreme Court: the Federalist Society's Origins on Law School Campuses
    1 Emily Jo Wharry HIST 490 Dec. 10, 2019 Student Club to Supreme Court: The Federalist Society's Origins on Law School Campuses Following the election of President George W. Bush in January 2000, a 35-year-old Brett M. Kavanaugh joined the new White House legal team, taking a position as an associate counsel to the president.1 A couple of months into the job, Kavanaugh came across a news article about his past that frustrated him. The article described him as still being an active member of the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies, a national organization of lawyers, judges, law school students, and professors who advocate for conservative legal doctrine and originalist interpretations of the United States Constitution. Worrying over this misreported detail, Kavanaugh wrote an email to his White House colleagues in which he assured them of the article's inaccuracy: "this may seem technical, but most of us resigned from the Federalist Society before starting work here and are not now members of the Federalist Society." Kavanaugh continued, "the reason I (and others) resigned from Fed society was precisely because I did not want anyone to be able to say that I had an ongoing relationship with any group that has a strong interest in the work of this office."2 Nineteen years later, in November 2019, the Federalist Society hosted its sold-out annual National Lawyers Convention at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, D.C. Kavanaugh, no 1 Scott Shane et al., “Influential Judge, Loyal Friend, Conservative Warrior — and D.C. Insider,” The New York Times, July 14, 2018, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/14/us/politics/judge-brett-kavanaugh.html.
    [Show full text]
  • The SPLC's Teaching Tolerance
    The SPLC’s TEACHING TOLERANCE What Parents, Teachers, and Administrators Need to Know Navigating our educational “Teaching Tolerance” is a special project run by the system is one of the biggest chal- SPLC and is designed to infiltrate schools through lenges facing families all across radically progressive education resources. The SPLC’s America. We worry about where stated goal of Teaching Tolerance (TT) is to “eradi- our children go to school and cate intolerance.”1 We know that for the SPLC, the the quality of education they target is not “the intolerant” per se but those who do will receive. We wonder if they will be able to find a job or at- tend college upon graduation. Will our children be safe and respected at school? Will our values be reinforced, or at BC19J01 least tolerated, or will they be undermined? These wor- ries are compounded by the sense that America’s chil- dren are being educated The SPLC brands Christian beliefs about sexuality as “hate.” away from values held dear by previous generations: an appreciation for hard work, self-con- not share their liberal worldview. According to an trol, civic duty, and love of country and neighbor. executive at the SPLC, “[w]e are focused, whether people like it or not, on the radical right.”2 A former Parents are wise to be on guard and active in their Senior Fellow at the SPLC describes the purpose of children’s school, in contact with their teachers and the Center as not just a “hate monitoring” organi- administrators, and dedicated monitors of curricula zation, but in reality, “[o]ur aim in life is to destroy and textbooks.
    [Show full text]
  • Parental Responsibility and the Future of the American Family Karl Zinsmeister
    Cornell Law Review Volume 77 Article 14 Issue 5 July 1992 Parental Responsibility and the Future of the American Family Karl Zinsmeister Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Karl Zinsmeister, Parental Responsibility and the Future of the American Family , 77 Cornell L. Rev. 1005 (1992) Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol77/iss5/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY AND THE FUTURE OF THE AMERICAN FAMILY Karl Zinsmeistert I, like Bill Kristol and Jane Larson, would like to begin by say- ing I think it's terrific that within this conference on the importance of individual responsibility, the organizers included a panel on the family. Individual responsibility and family responsibility are not al- ways the same thing. In fact I think most of us could agree that the family is one locale where non-individualist, and sometimes even anti-individualist, logic is most appropriate. Nevertheless, I want to argue that here, as in other sectors of American society, an ethic of private responsibility is the best way, and frequently the only way, of forging lasting solutions to our problems. I believe in the power and value of spontaneously evolved social institutions-the kinds of institutions that spring up organically to fill a need without any social engineer having been involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Scholarship Luncheon
    Scholarship Luncheon June 6, 2016 12 p.m. Crowne Plaza Welcome to Berks County Community Foundation’s 2016 Scholarship Luncheon Welcome Kevin K. Murphy, President Berks County Community Foundation Lunch Remarks Harry Deitz, Associate Publisher and Editor, Reading Eagle Kevin K. Murphy David Roland, Market President, BB&T bank Karl Zinsmeister, Vice President, The Philanthropy Roundtable Concluding Remarks Kevin K. Murphy Social media: Use #2016BerksLunch on Twitter and Instagram for today's event. Karl Zinsmeister Karl Zinsmeister oversees all magazine, book, and Web publishing at The Philanthropy Roundtable in Washington, D.C. In 2016 he produced The Almanac of American Philanthropy, the 1,342-page cul- mination of a multiyear effort to create the authoritative reference on America's fasci- nating and culturally seminal tradition of solving public problems with private resourc- es. He also founded and advises the Roundtable’s program on philanthropy for veterans and service members. Karl has authored 11 books, including two different works of embedded reporting on the Iraq war, a book on charter schools, a storytelling cookbook, even a graphic novel published by Marvel Comics. He has also made a PBS feature film and written hundreds of articles for publications ranging from The Atlantic to The Wall Street Journal. Earlier in his career he was a Senate aide to Daniel Patrick Moynihan, the J. B. Fuqua Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and editor in chief for nearly 13 years of The American Enterprise magazine. From 2006 to 2009 Karl served in the West Wing as the President's chief domestic policy adviser and director of the White House Domestic Policy Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Public Policy
    rethinkingPublic Policy Pepperdine University Institute for Public Policy By Joel Kotkin May 1998 rethinkingPublic Policy Written by Joel Kotkin John M. Olin Fellow Pepperdine University Edited by Lee R. Cerling and Todd Prepsky Personal acknowledgments from the author: This paper received valuable research assistance from Heather Barbour, Erik Keifel, and Diana Xuan. This paper also benefited from insight and encouragement from James R. Wilburn, inaugural dean, and Brad Cheves, associate dean for advancement and director of the Institute for Public Policy, of Pepperdine University's School of Public Policy, as well as Fred Siegel, professor of history, the Cooper Union. Lee Cerling and Todd Prepsky, also of Pepperdine, provided invaluable editing assistance. Pepperdine University 24255 Pacific Coast Highway Malibu, CA 90263-7490 (310) 456-4494 Established in January 1996 the Institute for Public Policy addresses key public policy issues through major conferences and seminars as well as through the publication of research findings. The institute operates under the auspices of the School of Public Policy, which offers a master of public policy degree emphasizing the moral and historical roots of free institutions. The school uses its location in Southern California as a rich laboratory for the emerging public policy paradigms of the twenty-first century. The school's graduates will be prepared for careers as leaders in government, the private sector, and non-profit organizations. Executive Summary In a way not seen since the 1930s, the public realm in America faces a crisis both of confidence and definition. After nearly six decades of continued expansion, governmental institutions command increasingly little support among the public that they are designed to serve.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Setting: a Wise Giver's Guide to Influencing Public Policy
    AGENDA SETTING MILLER Agenda Setting A Wise Giver’s Guide to Influencing Public Policy Donating money to modify public thinking and government policy has now taken its place next to service-centered giving as a constructive branch of philanthropy. Many donors now view public-policy reform as a necessary adjunct to their efforts to improve lives directly. This is perhaps inevitable given the mushrooming presence of government in our lives. In 1930, just 12 percent of U.S. GDP was consumed by government; by 2012 that had tripled to 36 percent. Unless and until that expansion of the state reverses, it is unrealistic to expect the philanthropic sector to stop trying to have a say in public policies. Sometimes it’s not enough to build a house of worship; one must create policies that make it possible for people to practice their faith freely within society. Sometimes it’s not enough to pay for a scholarship; one must change laws so that high-quality schools exist for scholarship recipients to take advantage of. Yet public-policy philanthropy has special ways of mystifying and frustrating practitioners. It requires understanding of governmental practice, interpretation of human nature, and some philosophical perspective. Public-policy philanthropists may encounter opponents operating from different principles who view them as outright enemies. Moreover, public-policy struggles never seem to end: victories and ZINSMEISTER and ZINSMEISTER one year become defeats the next, followed by comebacks, then setbacks, and on and on. This book was written to help donors navigate all of those obstacles. It draws Agenda on deep history, and rich interviews with the very best practitioners of public- policy philanthropy in America today.
    [Show full text]
  • The Exchange
    Reprinted from the Spring 2020 issue of Philanthropy magazine (PhilMag.org) The Exchange Compiled by A shl ey M ay IDEA PUBLIC SCHOOLS from the Permian Strategic Civics and Debate Initiative. experience—and I’m not sure started with one campus in Partnership, a collection of oil The state effort aims to increase they always do.” 2000 serving three grades in and gas companies. test scores on civic literacy -Former Hewlett Packard CEO the Rio Grande Valley, and IDEA has additional and expand public-speaking Carly Fiorina has become one of the most growth planned throughout programs to all public-school successful charter-school Texas, Louisiana, and Florida. districts. “What Florida is YOU MAY HAVE READ networks in America. IDEA The Philanthropy Roundtable’s doing to bring civics and Karl Zinsmeister’s recent currently serves 45,000 former K-12 education director debate to every student is op-ed in the Wall Street students at 79 campuses. Dan Fishman is IDEA’s very innovative and should Journal, “The War on Since 2007, 100 percent of its in-house growth guru. Go, be a model for the rest of the Philanthropy.” Thank you for graduates have been accepted Dan! -Pat Burke country,” commented Marcus. all your responses, and for by colleges, with over 60 sharing the piece so widely. percent of them being the first ELSEWHERE IN ED, HEARD AROUND TOWN… Karl wrote a follow-up essay generation in their family to Nancy and Rich Kinder Philanthropy friend Denver for RealClearPolitics, which get higher education. finished out 2019 by gifting Frederick interviews funders we’ve adapted here for your Now, thanks to a $10 million to the University and charitable leaders on his enjoyment and concern.
    [Show full text]
  • F-William-Engdahl-Stoljec487e-Rata-2
    F. William Engdahl STOLJEĆE RATA 2 Tajni geopolitički plan američke Vlade F. William Engdahl, autor bestselera o nafti i geopolitici Stoljeće rata: anglo-ame- rička naftna politika i novi svjetski poredak, te bestselera o genocidnoj geopolitici GMO hrane Sjeme uništenja: geopolitika genetski modificirane hrane i globalno carstvo, već više od trideset godina, tj. od prvoga naftno­ ga šoka i svjetske krize žita s početka se­ damdesetih godina 20. stoljeća, piše o pro­ blemima poljoprivrede, GATT-u, Svjetskoj tr­ govačkoj organizaciji (WTO), Međunarod­ nom monetarnom fondu (MMF-u), energiji, politici i ekonomiji. Diplomirao je politiku na Sveučilištu Princeton i stekao magisterij iz komparativne ekonomije na Sveučilištu Stockholm. Radio je kao neovisan ekono­ mist i novinar, prvo u New Yorku, a zatim u Europi, obrađujući teme poput Urugvajsko­ ga sastanka GATT-a, politike hrane Europske unije, kartela žita, politike MMF-a, problema vanjskoga duga zemalja Trećega svijeta, zaku­ lisnih fondova i azijske krize. Redovito piše za mnoge novine, časopise i elektronske medije, uključujući i japanski časopis Nihon Keizai Shimbun, te Forseight, Grant's In­ vestor, com, European Banker i Business Banker International. Predaje na mnogim me­ đunarodnim konferencijama na temu geo­ politike, GMO-a, ekonomije i energije, od Londona preko Džakarte do Poljske i Hrvat­ ske. Živi u Njemačkoj i, osim što redovito piše o pitanjima ekonomije, energije i o me­ đunarodnim problemima, radi i kao eko­ nomski savjetnik. F. William Engdahl STOLJEĆE RATA 2 Tajni geopolitički
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Dropbox\Dd\T\Cv Sept 2016.Wpd
    EDWARD PAUL LAZEAR CURRICULUM VITAE September, 2016 Business addresses: Hoover Institution Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6010 Phone: 650/723-4724 Fax: 650/723-0498 and Graduate School of Business Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-5015 Phone: 650/723-9136 Fax: 650/725-7979 PRIMARY POSITIONS: Morris Arnold Cox and Nona Jean Cox Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution (2002- ) and Jack Steele Parker Professor of Human Resources Management and Economics, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University (1995- ) PREVIOUS POSITIONS: Chairman, President’s Council of Economic Advisers, The White House (2006-09) Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution (1985-2002) Professor of Human Resource Management and Economics, Graduate School of Business (1992-95) Stanford University Coordinator of Domestic Studies (1987-1990), Hoover Institution Assistant Professor of Economics (1974-1978); Associate Professor of Industrial Relations (1978-1981); Professor of Industrial Relations (1981-1985); Isidore Brown and Gladys J. Brown Professor of Urban and Labor Economics, Graduate School of Business (1985-1992) University of Chicago OTHER AFFILIATIONS: Research Fellow, IZA (2002- 6, 2009-) Research Fellow, Center for Corporate Performance, Denmark (2004-6, 2009-) Member, Global Economic Symposium Advisory Board (2009- Member, George W. Bush Institute Board (2009- Research Fellow, SIEPR (2004-6, 2009-) Member, Advisory Council, Hong Kong Institute of Economics and Business Strategy, University of Hong Kong (2000-6 ) Chairman, Academic Research Committee, Research
    [Show full text]
  • Elevating the Role of Faith-Inspired Impact in the Social Sector
    Elevating the Role of Faith-Inspired Impact in the Social Sector By Jeri Eckhart Queenan, Peter Grunert, and Devin Murphy Collaborating to accelerate social impact January 2021 When one of Washington, DC’s largest human services providers —Catholic Charities DC (CCDC)—fell on hard times, its board recruited an experienced leadership team to help keep its doors open to the community’s most vulnerable. Monsignor John Enzler joined CCDC in 2011 as CEO amid a perfect storm of shrinking government funding and a philanthropic community that was still reeling from the impact of the Great Recession. “It was a tough time. Needs were rising. Resources were falling. There was a lot of dysfunction. The budget relied on public funds. [My] friends thought I was crazy and told me not to take the job,” he admits. But Enzler felt called to the work. “For Catholic Charities, the question is never ‘what’s your background?’ It’s only ‘how can we help?’ I want to be a change agent for people whose lives are a daily struggle for food, shelter, and clothing.” Unlike many human services organizations, CCDC had philanthropic benefactors who were willing to place a significant bet on the organization. Enzler says the turnaround began with two gifts totaling $6 million, which gave CCDC the flexibility to hire a seasoned chief operating officer and a chief financial officer who brought a lot of efficiencies to CCDC’s services in education, employment, and housing. With the help of COO Patrick Dunne, a retired rear admiral of the US Navy, and CFO Mary Jane Morrow, a former partner at accounting firm Grant Thornton, Enzler and the team mapped out a plan to evaluate and cut programs that were not sustained through funding, and reinvest precious unrestricted dollars in programs that were core to CCDC’s mission and impact.
    [Show full text]
  • The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), Phony Lists, and Intimidation
    The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), Phony Lists, and Intimidation What is the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC)? The SPLC touts itself as a nonprofit civil rights organization “dedicated to fighting hate and bigotry” by using “litigation, education, and other forms of advocacy.”1 It was founded in 1971 in Montgomery, Alabama, as a civil rights litigation firm to fight the ongoing resistance to equal treatment for African- Americans. The SPLC’s main target early on was the Ku Klux Klan, which it successfully sued for financial damages for the victims of Klan violence. Despite its laudable origins, over time the SPLC has morphed into a bitterly partisan actor that tries to play the role of political referee while simultaneously engaging in progressive activism. It does this by using smear tactics, intimidation, ritualized defamation,2 and a knack for fundraising to silence its political opponents. As of October 2017, the SPLC has 302 employees,3 four state offices, and an endowment fund of more than $432.7 million.4 • Among its products5 are: o “Intelligence Report:” According to the SPLC, the Intelligence Report is the “nation’s preeminent periodical monitoring the radical right in the U.S.” Each year, the spring edition of the report features annual totals for SPLC’s infamous “Hate List” and corresponding “Hate Map.” Among the 954 “Hate List” designees for 2017: Alliance Defending Freedom, American Family Association, Center for Security Policy, D. James Kennedy Ministries, Center for Immigration Studies, the Center for Family and Human Rights (C-FAM), and Family Research Council.6 In August 2012, Floyd Lee Corkins II entered Family Research Council’s headquarters in Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]