DOCSLIB.ORG

Battle of Togoruba Puzzling Historical Records

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Battle of Togoruba Puzzling Historical Records BATTLE OF TOGORUBA PUZZLING HISTORICAL RECORDS Historian Haile Menegesha Okbe Toronto, Canada March 26 2017 PART-2, THE BATTLES Intro Battle of Togoruba, March 15, 1964 is an ideal Eritrean heroism . Operation Sembel, February 12, 1975, a dual operation in one shot, by which 700 Eritrean political prisoners from Sembel Prison in Asmara and another 300 prisoners from Adi Quala Prison were simultaneously set free in a single heroic operation . The Crushing of Nadew Command, March 17-19, 1988, equaled to Dien Bien Phu victory by Vietcongs in Vietnam is an exceptional heroism . Fenkil, February 8- 1 10, 1990, the decisive blitzkrieg that captured Massawa from the control of Derg is also a distinguished Eritrean heroism. These are the four outstanding triumphs of all time accomplished by the Eritreans in their quest for freedom. Eritrean Liberation Front executed Togoruba and Sembel. Eritrean Peoples Liberation Front executed the smashing of Nadew and Fenkel. I am merely specifying who does what for the purpose of the historical records. Both organizations are "We" and "We" are both of them. Today, all Eritreans are one and united against the fascist ruler Isyas Afeworki. 1890-1941 - Italian Colonial Period in Eritrea. 1942-1952 - British Military Administration in Eritrea. Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery the ultimate winner of the Battle of El Alamein, Egypt. 2 Field Marshal Erwin Rommel (front) commander of German Afrika Korps was defeated by Montgomery in the Battle of El Alamein, which ended the German African campaign. October 23–November 11, 1942, The Battle of El Alamein was a turning point in the fight between the German and British forces in North West Africa. The fighting in North West Africa took place in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia. The theatres in Eritrea and Ethiopia were also part of it. The fall of Keren to British and Common Wealth forces on April 1, 1941 was a decisive victory. 3 In World War II, the desire to control Suez Canal pitched the Allied Forces and German Afrika Korps into fierce battles in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia. Parallel to those battles, British forces campaigned to dislodge the Italian forces from their colonies in Eritrea and Ethiopia. February 5 to April 1, 1941, The Battle of Keren. The fall of Keren to the British in the aftermath of the Battle of Keren, which was fought for two months, brought unconditional surrender of all Italian forces in Asmara and Massawa. April 1, 1941 is the date of the first liberation of Eritrea. The Battle of Keren belonged to the grand theatre in the campaigns of North West Africa between German Afrika Korps and the Allied Forces. Our historians quite often don't convey the complete and precise historical records. In reality, all historical records when put together are full of controversies and history is seldom fair to all opposing sides. The Battle of Keren was another facade of the Battle of El Alamein. Yet our history books falsely classify the British the same as the Ottoman or Egyptian colonial rulers in Eritrea. The British were the caregivers of the protectorate Eritrea while the latter were starkly marauders. October 7, 1951, UN introduced the Federation plan. Commissioner for Eritrea, Dr. Eduardo Anze Matenzo, from Bolivia by origin, announced that Eritreans had accepted a UN plan for federation with Ethiopia. Some Eritreans accepted it while a big chunk opposed it. 1952-1962 - Federation Right from the outset the provisions of the Federation were violated by Ethiopia as well by some Eritrean officials. In essence Federation was never implemented legally in Eritrea. Step bay step the Federation was 4 dismantled through Ethiopian heavy-handed interferences. Gradually it was replaced with the full colonization of Eritrea by Ethiopia. Emperor Haile Selassie officially cut a ribbon at the border of Mereb between Ethiopia and Eritrea after he officially accepted in September 15, 1952, the UN plan of the Federation. November 1958, Eritrean flag was lowered and Ethiopian flag hoisted. September 1, 1961, the beginning of the armed struggle in Eritrea. November 14, 1962, Eritrea was annexed by Ethiopia. Hamid Idris Awate pioneers versus Field Force of Eritrea Beginning in September 1, 1961, Hamid Idris Awate and the pioneers of the armed resistance launched numerous skirmishes against the Field Force of Eritrea, a native force trained and armed by the British Military Administration in Eritrea. The main task of the Field Force was to keep law and order in the country. They had the role of the federal army of Eritrea. Eritreans referred them as "Abay Police" or "Grand 5 Police" in order to distinguish them from regular city police referred as "Duguana" (Arrest). Field Force of Eritrea, the "federal army" trained and armed by the British Military Administration in Eritrea. 6 Infantry of the Ethiopian Armed Forces or "Tor Serawit". 7 Battle of Togoruba, the battle that shattered the ice in Eritrea From September 1, 1961 till the Battle of Togoruba in March 15, 1964 there has never been a combat in the field, which was engaged between Ertitreans and Ethiopian army personnel. All prior Togoruba combats were to be defined as the process of a civil war as all the duels were between Eritrean natives. The first combat that shattered the ice in Eritrea was the Battle of Togoruba. Togoruba is an historic event, which has three distinctive features. 1. The first battle between Eritreans and Ethiopian infantry. Togoruba marked the first combat between Eritrean natives and the infantry of the Ethiopian colonial army referred as "Tor Tserawit". Togoruba is also a puzzle. The challenge with Togoruba is how should we accommodate the precise timing of the start of the armed revolution against the actual colonial army? In real time it should be March 15, 1964 instead of September 1, 1961. The puzzle rests to historians. Symbolic face of Togoruba. Muhammad Ali Idris (Abu Rejela) leader of the Battle of Togoruba. 8 2. The first heroic battle in Eritrea. In the Battle of Togoruba the gallant fighters of Eritrean Liberation Front attacked the well-armed Ethiopian infantry for the first time in the history of Eritrea. The fighters killed 84 Ethiopian soldiers and officers. 3. Remembrance Day for the martyrdom. Togoruba is also a day of martyrdom. 18 fighters perished in the battle. The Ethiopian infantry who had advanced logistics at their disposal brought re-enforcement to the battle and they overwhelmed the fighters after the deployment. The fighters quickly retreated with four wounded fighters to safety. The Ethiopian infantry were able to secure the battle area. They collected the strewn corpses of the martyrs. The Ethiopian colonizers hanged the corpses of 6 martyrs in Akordat, 6 in Keren, 3 in Barentu and 2 in Haikota as showcases to demoralize the Eritreans. Collecting corpses of martyrs who fell in combat fields and hanging the corpses in city squares were common practices of the Ethiopian colonizers in Eritrea during the 60s. This showcase took place in Keren in the aftermath of the Battle of Halhal, September 6, 1968. 9 Contributions and Gratitude Historian and researcher Haile Menegesha Okbe has presented this document. It is Part-2 to the previous article, TORONTO MARCH 8 & TOGORUBA 2017, MAJOR BREAKTRHOUGH, PART-1, MARCH 8 CELEBRATION, March 20, 2017. This historical document recounts the Battle of Togoruba in a precise and concise fashion. It also contains summarized history of Eritrea leading to Togoruba event. For the first time, this document separates the domestic skirmishes from the first combat with the Ethiopian invading army in Eritrea with a clear marking using well presented information and dramatic photos. Some of the photos supplemented in this document are from GENBARTORONTO archive as well from the websites of other Eritrean historical experts. Thanks Ato Mohamed Kheir Omer, an Eritrean political activist of hedgait.blogspot.ca and Ato Fetsum Yukuno Amalak of gereger.com for the contribution of materials included in this document. Haile Menegesha Okbe [email protected] 416-858 9305 The End 10.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Military History Anniversaries 01 Thru 14 Feb
    Military History Anniversaries 01 thru 14 Feb Events in History over the next 14 day period that had U.S. military involvement or impacted in some way on U.S military operations or American interests Feb 01 1781 – American Revolutionary War: Davidson College Namesake Killed at Cowan’s Ford » American Brigadier General William Lee Davidson dies in combat attempting to prevent General Charles Cornwallis’ army from crossing the Catawba River in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Davidson’s North Carolina militia, numbering between 600 and 800 men, set up camp on the far side of the river, hoping to thwart or at least slow Cornwallis’ crossing. The Patriots stayed back from the banks of the river in order to prevent Lieutenant Colonel Banastre Tartleton’s forces from fording the river at a different point and surprising the Patriots with a rear attack. At 1 a.m., Cornwallis began to move his troops toward the ford; by daybreak, they were crossing in a double-pronged formation–one prong for horses, the other for wagons. The noise of the rough crossing, during which the horses were forced to plunge in over their heads in the storm-swollen stream, woke the sleeping Patriot guard. The Patriots fired upon the Britons as they crossed and received heavy fire in return. Almost immediately upon his arrival at the river bank, General Davidson took a rifle ball to the heart and fell from his horse; his soaked corpse was found late that evening. Although Cornwallis’ troops took heavy casualties, the combat did little to slow their progress north toward Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. THE STORY BEHIND THE STORIES British and Dominion War Correspondents in the Western Theatres of the Second World War Brian P. D. Hannon Ph.D. Dissertation The University of Edinburgh School of History, Classics and Archaeology March 2015 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ………………………………………………………………………….. 4 Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………… 5 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………… 6 The Media Environment ……………...……………….……………………….. 28 What Made a Correspondent? ……………...……………………………..……. 42 Supporting the Correspondent …………………………………….………........ 83 The Correspondent and Censorship …………………………………….…….. 121 Correspondent Techniques and Tools ………………………..………….......... 172 Correspondent Travel, Peril and Plunder ………………………………..……. 202 The Correspondents’ Stories ……………………………….………………..... 241 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………. 273 Bibliography ………………………………………………………………...... 281 Appendix …………………………………………...………………………… 300 3 ABSTRACT British and Dominion armed forces operations during the Second World War were followed closely by a journalistic army of correspondents employed by various media outlets including news agencies, newspapers and, for the first time on a large scale in a war, radio broadcasters.
    [Show full text]
  • Mind the Uppercase Letters
    The Springboks in East Africa: The role of 1 SA Survey Company (SAEC) in the East African Campaign of World War II, 1940-1941 Elri Liebenberg Department of Geography, University of South Africa Abstract. As a member of the British Commonwealth, South Africa was part of Britain’s war effort since September 1939. When Italy entered the War on the side of Germany on 10 June 1940, the Italian territories in East Africa comprised Abyssinia together with Eritrea, now part of Ethiopia, and Italian Somaliland, now part of the Somali Democratic Republic. Although pre-war plans did not anticipate that the SA Army would fight outside southern Africa, Italy’s involvement in north-east Africa made it inevitable that South African troops would be deployed to the new war frontier. The South African forces (commonly known in the media as “Springboks”) played a major role in the fall of Mussolini’s East African Empire. The war was fought under extreme physical circumstances, and it was especially the SAEC (South African Engineering Corps) which rendered invaluable ser- vices. By 1940 East Africa was still largely unmapped, and one of the SAEC units, 1 SA Survey Company (initially named the1st Field Survey Company), supported by 60 Photographic Squadron of the South African Air Force, mapped large parts of the war zone and provided essential military intelli- gence. This paper deals with the formation and subsequent deployment of 1 SA Survey Company in Kenya, Abyssinia and Somaliland, as well as the achie- vements of its various sections. The maps which were produced, are analy- sed against the background of the available source material and prevailing circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • From El Wak to Sidi Rezegh: the Union Defence Force's First
    177 178 Scientia Militaria vol 40, no 3, 2012, pp.177-199. doi: 10.5787/40-3-1027 Keywords: South Africa, Second World War, UDF, first battles, Abyssinia, Libya From El Wak to Sidi Rezegh: The Union Defence Introduction Force’s First Experience of Battle in East and North Africa, 1940-1941 With South Africa’s economy showing an upward trend at the end of 1933, the UDF began a process of recovering from the financial and organisational Gustav Bentz restrictions imposed on it during the previous years of depression. Leading this recovery, in 1934, Oswald Pirow, Minister of Defence (1933–1939), committed himself to a yearly increase in the defence budget in order to enable the UDF to produce maximum military effectiveness and efficiency. Abstract When war was eventually declared on 7 September 1939, the principles of the Union’s policy on defence rested on three pillars. The government South Africa entered the Second World War on the side of Great Britain in committed itself to prevent and suppress internal unrest. Any military September 1939 and, in spite of extensive changes and an increased budget, involvement in this regard would be directed against “native” uprisings and the Union Defence Force (UDF) found itself in a state of war on 7 rebellions. The second area of focus was to provide military training to a September 1939 with a Permanent Force of only 5 400 men with limited section of the white male population of South Africa. This would serve, in training and antiquated equipment. While Hitler’s armies conquered the event of mobilisation, to have partially trained personnel ready for Western Europe the Springboks prepared to go North and in spite of military service.1 The next focus area of the government’s policy on defence trepidations about the might of Mussolini’s East African Empire the First was that of protection against an external threat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Keren Every British Move Could Be Seen, and They Directed Their fi Re Accordingly
    Buy Now! Italians also had an advantage in the form of observation posts from which Home The Battle of Keren every British move could be seen, and they directed their fi re accordingly. By David March The 4th Royal Tank Regiment failed to get past, but on 3 February the 2nd Cameron Highlanders advanced uphill to the left to secure the ridge that’s since been given their name. Reconnaissance to the right failed to fi nd a sure way of fully outfl anking the enemy in that direction, though there was one gap that seemed to provide a possible line of advance. The Italian forward posts (the only ones the Commonwealth guns could initially reach) were sighted behind crests below the mountain peaks, and were further protected by a double apron of wire to their front and back. Machineguns were set in stone dugouts, and the hard-surfaced terrain allowed grenades thrown uphill An absolete British Wellesley aircraft on its way to give ground support at Keren to simply roll back down on the lower approaches. The knife-edged ridges Grenadiers, elite and battle-hardened left of Dongolaas Gorge, a move shielded the defenders from the heavi- troops commanded by Col. Corso Corsi. based on Gazelle Force’s earlier est of the Commonwealth artillery fi re. All totaled, the defenders numbered reconnaissance. The 2nd Queen’s Own The overall Italian commander 25,000 troops backed by 144 guns. Cameron Highlanders made their in Eritrea, the Duke of Aosta, reached way to the front of Mount Sanchil, the Keren area on 7 February; with him First Stage: 5-8 February where they were reinforced the next came 2nd Brigade, as well as 11th Brigade day by the 3/14 Punjab Regiment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Springboks in East Africa: the Role of 1 Sa Survey Company (Saec) in the East African Campaign of World War Ii, 1940–1941
    87 THE SPRINGBOKS IN EAST AFRICA: THE ROLE OF 1 SA SURVEY COMPANY (SAEC) IN THE EAST AFRICAN CAMPAIGN OF WORLD WAR II, 1940–1941 Elri Liebenberg1 Department of Geography, University of South Africa Abstract As a member of the British Commonwealth, South Africa was part of Britain’s war effort from September 1939 onward. When Italy entered the War on the side of Germany on 10 June 1940, the territories governed by Italy in East Africa comprised Abyssinia together with Eritrea, now part of Ethiopia, and Italian Somaliland, now part of the Somali Democratic Republic. Although pre-war plans did not anticipate that the South African (SA) Army would fight outside southern Africa, Italy’s involvement in northeast Africa made it inevitable that SA troops would be deployed to the new war front. The SA forces (nicknamed ‘Springboks’ in the media) played a major role in the demise of Mussolini’s East African Empire. The war was fought under extreme physical conditions, and it was especially the SAEC (South African Engineering Corps) who rendered invaluable service. By 1940 East Africa was still largely unmapped, and one of the SAEC units, 1 SA Survey Company (initially named the 1st Field Survey Company), supported by 60 Photographic Squadron of the SA Air Force (SAAF), mapped large parts of the war zone and provided essential military intelligence. Although the role the SAEC as a whole played in the East African Campaign has received attention in publications on South Africa’s involvement in World War II, little attention has been paid to the essential cartographical services rendered by 1 SA Survey Company.
    [Show full text]
  • Military History Anniversaries 01 Thru 14 Feb
    Military History Anniversaries 01 thru 14 Feb Events in History over the next 14 day period that had U.S. military involvement or impacted in some way on U.S military operations or American interests Feb 01 1781 – American Revolution: American Brigadier General William Lee Davidson dies in combat attempting to prevent General Charles Cornwallis’ army from crossing the Catawba River in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Feb 01 1861 – Civil War: Texas Succeeds. Texas becomes the seventh state to secede from the Union when a state convention votes 166 to 8 in favor of the measure. Feb 01 1909 – U.S. troops leave Cuba after installing Jose Miguel Gomez as president. Feb 01 1917 – WWI: The lethal threat of the German U-boat submarine raises its head again, as Germany returns to the policy of unrestricted submarine warfare it had previously suspended in response to pressure from the United States and other neutral countries. Feb 01 1942 – WW2: U.S. Navy conducts Marshalls–Gilberts raids, the first offensive action by the United States against Japanese forces in the Pacific Theater. Feb 01 1943 – WW2: Japanese forces on Guadalcanal Island, defeated by Marines, start to withdraw after the Japanese emperor finally gives them permission. Feb 01 1945 – WW2: U.S. Rangers and Filipino guerrillas rescue 513 American survivors of the Bataan Death March. Feb 01 1951 – Cold War: By a vote of 44 to 7, the United Nations General Assembly passes a resolution condemning the communist government of the People’s Republic of China for acts of aggression in Korea. It was the first time since the United Nations formed in 1945 that it had condemned a nation as an aggressor.
    [Show full text]
  • Sidi Rezegh and Tobruk Two South African Military Disasters Revisited 1941 - 1942
    SIDI REZEGH AND TOBRUK TWO SOUTH AFRICAN MILITARY DISASTERS REVISITED 1941 - 1942 by DAVID BROCK KATZ Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Military Science (Military History) in the Faculty of Military Science at Stellenbosch University. Supervisor: Prof I.J. van der Waag Co-Supervisor: Prof G.E. Visser December 2014 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za “Declaration” By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: 12 November 2014 Copyright © 2014 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za ABSTRACT Sidi Rezegh and Tobruk are the largest disasters suffered by South Africa in its military history. Yet, despite their enormity, Sidi Rezegh and Tobruk are little understood and hardly remembered. South Africa declared war on Germany on the 6 September 1939, after a bitter internal debate, amounting to a conflict between Afrikaner nationalists and those who supported the British Empire. South Africa’s political ambivalence and disunity ran parallel to her unpreparedness for war in every important department from the lack of vital coastal defences to the miniscule size of her army and air force and complete lack of a navy. The first six months of 1941 saw the South Africans play a significant part in completely defeating the Italian colonial forces in East Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Keren 1941, East Africa
    KEREN 1941, EAST AFRICA AAR of World at War 25 Keren, 1941: East Africa Orders to Sudan Based Forces January 30, 1941 From: Commander in Chief, Middle East Command, General Archibald Wavell To: Commander of the Northern Front, Lieutenant-General William Platt Lieutenant-General, Your orders are to pursue the enemy down the road to Keren employing both 4th and 5th Indian Divisions. Upon capturing Keren, await further orders from the Middle East Command. Good Luck and Godspeed. The Battle of Keren has the Savoia Grenadiers defending against a Commonwealth assault aimed at the capture of the town of Keren, of the Italian colony in Eritrea. Keren is of strategic importance as the railroad and road junctions are keys to the access of Amara and the Red Sea port of Massawa. February 5, 1941. Turn One Administration Phase. Both players check the supply status of their units. All of the troops by E.R. Bickford of both sides begin in supply. Production: Commonwealth Bombardment. The Lise’ Patterson British player wants to suppress enemy units before bringing them to battle, © 2012 Decision Games so he uses his artillery to bombard the Italian positions. The 4th Indian Bakersfield, CA. Division has three artillery units which are fired at the position near Mount Sanchil. As a result, one Italian colonial battalion is eliminated and two artillery batteries are suppressed. The artillery with 5th Indian Division has no line of sight to an enemy posi- tion so there is no fire from them. WW 25 | AFTER ACTION REPORT | AUG–SEP 2012 A1 KEREN 1941 Italian Bombardment.
    [Show full text]
  • Eritrea, September 2005
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Eritrea, September 2005 COUNTRY PROFILE: ERITREA September 2005 Formal Name: State of Eritrea (Hagere Ertra). Short Form: Eritrea (Ertra). Term for Citizen(s): Eritrean(s). Capital: Asmara (alternate spelling Asmera). Major Cities: Asmara, Keren, Assab, Massawa, Afabet, Teseney, Mendefera, Dekemhare, Adekeieh, Barentu, and Ghinda (according to decreasing size, 2005 estimates). Independence: Eritrea officially celebrated its independence from Ethiopia on May 24, 1993. Public Holidays: Eritrea observes the following public holidays: New Year’s Day (January 1), Independence Day (May 24), Martyrs’ Day (June 20), Anniversary of the Start of Armed Struggle (September 1), and Christmas Day (December 25). The following holidays with movable dates determined by the Islamic or Orthodox calendar are celebrated as well: Eid al Fitr, Eid al Adha, Epiphany, and Easter. Flag: Eritrea’s flag is a rectangle divided into three triangles: a red isosceles triangle based on the hoist side, and a green upper and blue lower right triangle. A gold wreath encircling a gold olive branch is centered on the Click to Enlarge Image hoist side of the red triangle. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Colonial Era: Until the late nineteenth century, the high plateau of present-day Eritrea was a part of the Ethiopian province of Tigray. Its inhabitants, racially, culturally, and linguistically Tigrayan, were subjects of the Ethiopian crown, whereas the surrounding lowlanders were for the most part independent. The boundaries of modern Eritrea were established during the period of Italian colonization that began in the late 1800s. An Italian shipping company, Rubatinno Shipping, purchased the port of Assab from a local ruler.
    [Show full text]
  • The Co Clare War Dead Individual Profiles WW2
    Clare in WW2 / The Emergency The Co Clare War Dead Individual Profiles WW2 D Day 1944 - The 2nd US Rangers By Ger Browne The aim of this project is to find out how many men and women from Clare took part in WW2, and the effect of the war on Clare. It is hoped that an extension will be added to the Great War Memorial in Ennis that will include the names of the Clare War Dead from WW2 / The Emergency. At the moment we know that 86 died from Clare as well as in Clare. I would like to thank Keir McNamara, and his late father Peadar McNamara for all their research on WW1 and WW2. Eric Shaw, who has been providing me with amazing WW1 and WW2 information for years, and all the following who have helped make this project possible. Paddy Waldron, The Local Studies Centre, Peter Beirne, Brian Doyle, Guss O’Halloran, Sean Glennon, Jim Molohan, Joe Ó Muircheartaigh, Eddie Lough, Local Parish Booklets, The Clare Champion and The Clare People. I have also named the sources, with many of the names below. I thank them all. The following websites: findagrave website, ancestry.com, fold3.com, http://www.ww2irishaviation.com, and the Commonwealth War Grave Commission. Finally thanks to the Clare Library for publishing all the information, and Larry and James Brennan along with the Clare Roots Society, for all their help. 1 Trooper Martin Barry Trooper Martin Barry: Kilrush. 18th (5th Bn. The Loyal Regt.) Regt., Reconnaissance Corps 6915422. He died as a POW on the 22nd June 1945 aged 26 in Hong Kong, where he was buried in the Sai Wan War Cemetery.
    [Show full text]
  • The 10Th Indian Division in the Italian Campaign, 1944-45: Training, Manpower
    THE 10TH INDIAN DIVISION IN THE ITALIAN CAMPAIGN, 1944-45: TRAINING, MANPOWER AND THE SOLDIER’S EXPERIENCE By MATTHEW DAVID KAVANAGH A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of MA BY RESEARCH, HISTORY School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham September 2014 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This dissertation will observe the capabilities and experience of the Indian Army in the Second World War, by examining the 10th Indian Division’s campaign in Italy. The focus will be on three themes of the division’s deployment to Italy; its training, manpower and the experience of the Indian soldier. Whilst these themes are part of the wider historiography of the Indian Army; there has been no significant study of these topics in relation to Italy, which this work seeks to redress. Observing the division’s training and manpower will indicate its capabilities during the Second World War. How did the Indian Army maintain an expeditionary force far from its home base, given the structural weaknesses in its recruitment and organisation? Did the Indian Army’s focus on the war in Japan, and jungle warfare, have a detrimental effect on the training of troops deployed to Italy? The reforms that the Indian Army, made to its training and organisation were critical in overcoming the difficulties that arose from campaigning in Italy.
    [Show full text]